Introduction:
 
The events of the Akeidah now concluded, Avraham returns to find that his beloved wife Sarah has passed away. Imagine the turmoil and anguish he must have suffered. The joy of receiving his son back from the dead, figuratively speaking, is now met with the continuing reality, albeit temporary, of the wages of sin. The death of Sarah illuminates the truth that the promised resurrection is prefigured in Yitzchak and yet to come in Yeshua.
 
The Targum Yonatan explains that Satan had told Sarah that Avraham had slaughtered Isaac and upon hearing this she cried out in grief and died. This would explain why Avraham and Isaac were not present at her death:
 
“Avraham came to eulogize Sarah and bewail her” (Genesis 23:2.)
 
The Rabbis suggest that this is the reason that the account of Sarah’s death follows directly after Ha-Akeidah (The Binding of Isaac). The sages remind us however, that Sarah’s appointed time had come regardless of Satan’s role in her demise, and that her last breathe came with the knowledge that she had raised a son who was willing to give up even his life in the service of Hashem.
 
We should also note that this Torah portion is titled, “Chayei Sarah” which translates to, “The Life of Sarah” as opposed to, “The Death of Sarah.” God is the God of the living.
 
Yeshua the King Messiah says:
 
“But concerning the dead being raised, haven’t you read in the book of Moshe about the burning bush? How Elohim said to him, ‘I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob’? He’s not the God of the dead, but of the living.”
 
–Mark 12:26-27 
 
וַיִּהְיוּ֙ חַיֵּ֣י שָׂרָ֔ה מֵאָ֥ה שָׁנָ֛ה וְעֶשְׂרִ֥ים שָׁנָ֖ה וְשֶׁ֣בַע שָׁנִ֑ים שְׁנֵ֖י חַיֵּ֥י שָׂרָֽה׃
 
Gen 23:1 And the life of Sarah (Princess/Queen/Matriarch) was a hundred years and twenty years and seven years; these were the years of the life of Sarah.
 
The years of Sarah’s life are intentionally divided by the author of the Torah and His scribe. In Hebrew the text reads, “וַיִּהְיוּ֙ חַיֵּ֣י שָׂרָ֔ה מֵאָ֥ה שָׁנָ֛ה Vayi-h’yu chayeiy Sarah meiah (100) shanah (years) וְעֶשְׂרִ֥ים שָׁנָ֖ה v’esriym (20) shanah (years) וְשֶׁ֣בַע שָׁנִ֑ים v’sheva (seven) shaniym (years)...”
 
Rashi suggests that the division of years reflects the progression of Sarah’s spiritual innocence and natural beauty.
 
In Biblical Hebrew thought the number 100 reflects the tenfold completion of the number 10, signifying a fulfilled promise or purpose. The number 20, being twice the completion of 10, may convey the birth and resurrection of Yitzchak, or the first and second fulfilments of the ram’s sacrifice, and the number 7, known by even the Torah novice as a number reflecting creation and the present and perfect manifest kavod (glory) of God (a.k.a Shekhinah), conveys a sense of the perfected purpose of God and His constant presence in Sarah’s life to this point in her story, with the promise of eternal life in the presence of HaShem in the Olam Haba (World to come).
 
By all accounts, this is the passing on of Israel’s first Queen, and prior to this we have already received news of Israel’s second Queen, Rivkah (Rebecca), the one in whom the purposes of God are tightly bound.
 
וַתָּ֣מָת שָׂרָ֗ה בְּקִרְיַ֥ת אַרְבַּ֛ע הִ֥וא חֶבְר֖וֹן בְּאֶ֣רֶץ כְּנָ֑עַן וַיָּבֹא֙ אַבְרָהָ֔ם לִסְפֹּ֥ד לְשָׂרָ֖ה וְלִבְכֹּתָֽהּ׃
 
Gen 23:2 And Sarah died in קִרְיַ֥ת אַרְבַּ֛ע Kiriat-arba (City of four) - the same is חֶבְר֖וֹן Chevron (Company, Shared, Magician) - in the land of כְּנָ֑עַן C’naan (lowland); and Avraham (Father of many nations) came to mourn for Sarah, and to weep for her.
 
"And Avraham came from the mount of worship (Moriah), and found that she (Sarah) was dead, and he sat down to mourn for Sarah, and to weep for her.''
 
–Targum Yonatan
 
Hebron is situated in the hill country of Judah approximately 32 km south of Jerusalem. The Torah records it as the burial place of each of the patriarchs and matriarchs of Israel (Genesis 23:19; 35:27; 49:29-32; 50:13).
 
In laying their bones to rest at Hebron, the patriarchs and matriarchs of Israel left a testimony of their faith in what God had promised would come. So too Joseph had instructed the sons of Israel with the prophetic words:
 
“And Yosef (YHVH: Mercy adds) said to his brothers, “I die: and Elohiym (Judge) God will attend, number, appoint, care for and visit you, and bring you up out of this land to the land which He swore to Avraham (Father of many people), to Yitzchaak (He laughs), and to Yaakov (Follower). And Yosef required an oath of the children of Yisrael (Overcome in God) saying, “Elohiym (Judge) God will attend, number, appoint, care for and visit you, and you shall carry up my bones from here.””
 
–Bereishit (Genesis) 50:24-25 [Author’s translation]
 
“And Moshe took the bones of Yosef with him; for he had required an oath from b’nai Yisrael (the children of Israel), saying: 'God will surely remember you; and you will carry up my bones away from here with you.'”
 
–Shemot (Exodus) 13:19 [Author’s translation]
 
Hebron was also the first seat of David’s kingdom (2 Samuel 2:1-4; 5:1-5).
 
Sarah died in a city named for a hero (Arba) of the Anakim (Long necked, giants) much later in Israel’s history (Joshua 14:15). It is also considered by Rashi to be a prophetic name in honour of the four (arba) great couples who were buried there: Adam and Eve (Pirke Eliezer, c. 20. & 36), Abraham and Sarah, Isaac and Rebecca, and Jacob and Leah.
 
וַיָּ֙קָם֙ אַבְרָהָ֔ם מֵעַ֖ל פְּנֵ֣י מֵת֑וֹ וַיְדַבֵּ֥ר אֶל־בְּנֵי־חֵ֖ת לֵאמֹֽר׃
 
Gen 23:3 And Avraham rose up from before his dead, and spoke unto the children of חֵ֖ת Chet (Terror), saying:
 
We know from the latter verses that this was taking place at the city gate where business and legal matters were determined in the ancient eastern culture of Avraham’s time.
 
Sadly, today, Avraham’s children continue to rise up from before our dead in order to speak to the children of terror. Though the Historical Biblical record clearly testifies to Israel’s legal ownership of Sarah’s tomb and the surrounding land, Hebron remains under the tacit control of Israel’s enemies (Palestinian Authority).
 
Chet was the son of C’naan, meaning lowland (Genesis 10:15). Thus we read, “The children of Terror from the lowland.”
 
 גֵּר־וְתוֹשָׁ֥ב אָנֹכִ֖י עִמָּכֶ֑ם תְּנ֨וּ לִ֤י אֲחֻזַּת־קֶ֙בֶר֙ עִמָּכֶ֔ם וְאֶקְבְּרָ֥ה מֵתִ֖י מִלְּפָנָֽי׃
 
Gen 23:4 “I am a stranger and a sojourner with you: give me a possession of a burying-place with you, that I may inter my dead from before my face.”
 
In modern terms we would equate Avraham’s words with a resident immigrant, one who has come from another land but has made his new home among us.
 
Avraham shows tremendous humility in pleading for a tomb for his wife. After all, the land he is asking for has already been promised to him by God.
 
The Midrash illuminates further both the promise of God and the humility of His servant Avraham:
 
“You humiliated yourself before them; by your life, I shall make you a lord and prince over them”
 
-Midrash HaGadol
 
Rabbi Yosef Dov Soloveitchik notes that Avraham expresses the two roles a Jew must play. On one hand, a resident and advocate for his country, who prays for the wellbeing of the nation where he lives (Jeremiah 29:7). While on the other hand, a Jew in this world is always an alien, his allegiance is to God and his goal is set out in the Torah [The goal of the Torah being Messiah (Romans 10:4)]. Rav Yosef concludes that a Jew must always be ready to be a lonely alien, resisting the culture that surrounds him and maintaining his unique identity and responsibility.
 
The book of Leviticus describes the people of Israel as resident aliens living on land owned by God (Leviticus 25:23). These same words are also used to convey the transience of human life and the unworthiness of humanity in the face of God’s holiness and provision (2 Chronicles 29:15).
 
וַיַּעֲנ֧וּ בְנֵי־חֵ֛ת אֶת־אַבְרָהָ֖ם לֵאמֹ֥ר לֽוֹ׃
שְׁמָעֵ֣נוּ׀ אֲדֹנִ֗י נְשִׂ֨יא אֱלֹהִ֤ים אַתָּה֙ בְּתוֹכֵ֔נוּ בְּמִבְחַ֣ר קְבָרֵ֔ינוּ קְבֹ֖ר אֶת־מֵתֶ֑ךָ אִ֣ישׁ מִמֶּ֔נּוּ אֶת־קִבְר֛וֹ לֹֽא־יִכְלֶ֥ה מִמְּךָ֖ מִקְּבֹ֥ר מֵתֶֽךָ׃
 
Gen 23:5 And the children of Chet answered Avraham, saying to him: Gen 23:6 “Hear us, my lord (Adoniy): you are a mighty prince among us; choose from our tombs, inter your dead; none of us shall withhold from you his tomb, so that you may inter your dead.”
 
The answer given by the children of Chet is blatant flattery. In fact, the subsequent bartering and the exorbitant asking price shows how little respect they had for Avraham, whom they saw as an immigrant usurper rather than an assimilated member of their society. The social and legal structure of the time saw this first verbal interaction as the initiation of a bargaining protocol. The niceties are simply that, cultural etiquette rather than genuine sentiment.
 
וַיָּ֧קָם אַבְרָהָ֛ם וַיִּשְׁתַּ֥חוּ לְעַם־הָאָ֖רֶץ לִבְנֵי־חֵֽת׃
 וַיְדַבֵּ֥ר אִתָּ֖ם לֵאמֹ֑ר אִם־יֵ֣שׁ אֶֽת־נַפְשְׁכֶ֗ם לִקְבֹּ֤ר אֶת־מֵתִי֙ מִלְּפָנַ֔י שְׁמָע֕וּנִי וּפִגְעוּ־לִ֖י בְּעֶפְר֥וֹן בֶּן־צֹֽחַר׃
 
Gen 23:7 And Avraham rose up, and bowed down to the people of the land, even to the children of Chet. Gen 23:8 And he spoke with them, saying: “If it be your mind that I should inter my dead from before my face, hear me, and petition Ephron (Calf-like, dust man, stag diving) the son of Zochar (Tawny, reddish grey, whiteness, sheen) on my behalf,
 
Avraham bows down out of respect and in humility. Though Ephron was present (v.10), Avraham follows the local custom and seeks out the approval of the elders of the city gate in order to broker a negotiation with Ephron.
 
The phrase, “inter my dead from before my face” infers that Avraham is aware that his wife Sarah, while no longer before his face, is none the less in the presence of HaShem and before His face. That Avraham and Sarah believed in the Olam Haba (World to come) is affirmed by the Jewish writer of the book to the Hebrews:
 
“8 In faith, trust, assurance, belief Avraham (Father of a great people), when he was called, to go to the land which he was to receive for an inheritance, obeyed; and he left, not knowing where he was going. 9 In faith, trust, assurance, belief he sojourned, lived as a foreigner in the land of the promise, message, as if in a foreign land, dwelling in tents with Yitzchak [Isaac] and Yaakov [Jacob], fellow heirs of the same promise, message; 10 for he was looking, expecting, waiting for the city which has foundations, whose architect and builder is the God. 11 In faith, trust, assurance, belief even Sarah herself received strength, ability, miraculous power to conceive, make the foundation of a child being seeded brought forth when she was past age, because she considered Him faithful Who had promised, messaged. 12 Therefore even from one man, and one who was as good as dead, there were birthed descendants who were as the stars of heavens in multitudes, and as the sand by the seashore, uncountable. 13 All these died in faith, trust, assurance, belief, without receiving the promises, but having seen, known, understood from a distance, and were persuaded, had confidence, trusted, and embraced, welcomed, greeted them, having professed that they were strangers and exiles, resident foreigners in the land. 14 For those who say such things make it clear that they are seeking a native land. 15 And certainly if they had been remembering the land which they left, they would have had a season, opportunity, an affinity for returning. 16 But now, they desire a better land, that is, a heavenly one. Therefore the God is not ashamed to be called their God; for He has prepared a city for them. ”
 
–Hebrews 11:8-16 [Author’s translation]
 
וְיִתֶּן־לִ֗י אֶת־מְעָרַ֤ת הַמַּכְפֵּלָה֙ אֲשֶׁר־ל֔וֹ אֲשֶׁ֖ר בִּקְצֵ֣ה שָׂדֵ֑הוּ בְּכֶ֨סֶף מָלֵ֜א יִתְּנֶ֥נָּה לִ֛י בְּתוֹכְכֶ֖ם לַאֲחֻזַּת־קָֽבֶר׃
 
Gen 23:9 that he may give me the cave of Machpeilah (Double, folding), which he has, which is within the end of his field; for the full price let him give it to me in the midst of you for a possession of a burying-place.”
 
The name Machpeilah (Double) infers that either there may have been two caves in the location or that the place would one day be home to the bodies of both Sarah and Avraham.
 
The petition for gifting the cave is qualified by the offer to pay a fair price, thus, “give” should be understood as the literal act of giving something over, rather than as a present, or gift that is given entirely at the expense of the giver.
 
The phrase, “let him give it to me in the midst of you as a possession” seeks to establish a rhythm of testimony that sees this transaction firmly attested to by witnesses as a form of security for the future generations of Avraham’s family line.
 
 וְעֶפְר֥וֹן יֹשֵׁ֖ב בְּת֣וֹךְ בְּנֵי־חֵ֑ת וַיַּעַן֩ עֶפְר֨וֹן הַחִתִּ֤י אֶת־אַבְרָהָם֙ בְּאָזְנֵ֣י בְנֵי־חֵ֔ת לְכֹ֛ל בָּאֵ֥י שַֽׁעַר־עִיר֖וֹ לֵאמֹֽר׃
 לֹֽא־אֲדֹנִ֣י שְׁמָעֵ֔נִי הַשָּׂדֶה֙ נָתַ֣תִּי לָ֔ךְ וְהַמְּעָרָ֥ה אֲשֶׁר־בּ֖וֹ לְךָ֣ נְתַתִּ֑יהָ לְעֵינֵ֧י בְנֵי־עַמִּ֛י נְתַתִּ֥יהָ לָּ֖ךְ קְבֹ֥ר מֵתֶֽךָ׃
 
Gen 23:10  Now Ephron (Calf-like, dust man, stag diving) was sitting in the midst of the children of Chet (Terror); and Ephron the Cheeti (Descendant of terror) answered Avraham (Father of many nations) in the hearing of the children of Chet (Terror), even of all that went in at the gate of his city, saying: Gen 23:11 “No, my lord (Adoniy), hear me: I give you the field, and the cave that is within it, I give it to you; in the presence of the sons of my people I give it to you; inter your dead.”
 
Ephron’s use of the honorific, “My lord” is equally as disingenuous as the general response of his clansmen. Again, he is either offering to give over the field with a price in mind, or he intends to gift it without a legal transaction taking place so that Avraham would become his tenant and the land would remain in Ephron’s family following Avraham’s death. This is not a genuine offer.
 
Ephron, realizing Avraham is intent on purchasing the cave and fields, calls on the witness of his clansmen in order to seek compensation for the cave and adds the field in order to glean a greater price. Anyone who has experienced the Jerusalem, Carmel or the Old Yafo shukim  (markets) will have come across similar types of bartering protocol, a culture of wheeling and dealing. Ironically, the proclaiming of this deal before the witnesses at the city gate strengthens Avraham’s descendants’ perpetual legal claim to the cave and its surrounding land.
 
We should keep in mind that Avraham is negotiating for his wife’s burial place, he is recently bereaved and is surely in great turmoil and under weighty emotional stress due to the loss of his life-long partner and friend.
 
Anyone who would take advantage of a man during a time of grief is the very personification of unrighteousness.
​
וַיִּשְׁתַּ֙חוּ֙ אַבְרָהָ֔ם לִפְנֵ֖י עַ֥ם הָאָֽרֶץ׃
 וַיְדַבֵּ֨ר אֶל־עֶפְר֜וֹן בְּאָזְנֵ֤י עַם־הָאָ֙רֶץ֙ לֵאמֹ֔ר אַ֛ךְ אִם־אַתָּ֥ה ל֖וּ שְׁמָעֵ֑נִי נָתַ֜תִּי כֶּ֤סֶף הַשָּׂדֶה֙ קַ֣ח מִמֶּ֔נִּי וְאֶקְבְּרָ֥ה אֶת־מֵתִ֖י שָֽׁמָּה׃
 
Gen 23:12 And Avraham bowed down before the people of the land. Gen 23:13 And he spoke to Ephron in the hearing of the people of the land, saying: “But if you will, I plead with you, hear me: I will give the price of the field; take it from me, and I will bury my dead there.”
 
Yet again the phrase, “in the hearing of the people of the land” reinforces the legal status of the land and those who possess it. Avraham continues as he has intended from the beginning, offering a fair price for the field, which also contains the caves.
 
 וַיַּ֧עַן עֶפְר֛וֹן אֶת־אַבְרָהָ֖ם לֵאמֹ֥ר לֽוֹ׃
 אֲדֹנִ֣י שְׁמָעֵ֔נִי אֶרֶץ֩ אַרְבַּ֨ע מֵאֹ֧ת שֶֽׁקֶל־כֶּ֛סֶף בֵּינִ֥י וּבֵֽינְךָ֖ מַה־הִ֑וא וְאֶת־מֵתְךָ֖ קְבֹֽר׃
 
Gen 23:14 And Ephron answered Avraham, saying unto him: Gen 23:15 “My lord (Adoniy), listen unto me: a piece of land worth four hundred shekels of silver, what is that between me and you? Therefore, inter your dead.”
 
This is where the true character of Ephron is exposed. He offers a price that is at least 20 times the value of the land according to the standard shekel. Rashi notes that it was a price great enough to purchase a huge estate. There is no question that Ephron is using the urgency of Avraham’s situation against him, and that he is taking advantage of a grieving man and his retinue. By way of qualification, Jeremiah the prophet redeems an entire ancestral land plot several times greater than this one for 17 shekels (Jeremiah 32:9), and on Mt Moriah, David purchases the threshing floor and oxen for 50 shekels (2 Samuel 24:24).
 
Those who wish to contest this conclusion site the 600 shekels David paid for the entire Temple mount (1 Chronicles 21:25). However, the Temple mount is not comparable to the plot at Hebron, either in area or in significance. They also note that Omri paid 6000 shekels for the virgin hill of Samaria (1 Kings 16:24) but fail to take into account the context of this act and the evil intent and money flaunting of the wicked king Omri. Even if one were to concede the point of these two higher costings, it becomes redundant when the identification of the common trade currency (referred to in the next verse as, “current money”) is made.
 
וַיִּשְׁמַ֣ע אַבְרָהָם֮ אֶל־עֶפְרוֹן֒ וַיִּשְׁקֹ֤ל אַבְרָהָם֙ לְעֶפְרֹ֔ן אֶת־הַכֶּ֕סֶף אֲשֶׁ֥ר דִּבֶּ֖ר בְּאָזְנֵ֣י בְנֵי־חֵ֑ת אַרְבַּ֤ע מֵאוֹת֙ שֶׁ֣קֶל כֶּ֔סֶף עֹבֵ֖ר לַסֹּחֵֽר׃
 
Gen 23:16 And Avraham listened to Ephron; and Avraham weighed to Ephron the silver, which he had named in the hearing of the children of Chet, four hundred shekels of silver, current money with the merchant.
 
Avraham agreed to the amount, not out of desperation but with the knowledge that he was setting a legal precedent for his progeny. Though the price was exorbitant, Avraham considered this a physical representation of the greater future benefits that God had promised to his offspring.
 
The Hebrew, “עֹבֵ֖ר לַסֹּחֵֽר oveir lasocheir” translated as, “current money” is a description of a larger trading silver shekel that became known later in history as a centenaries. The Talmud (Bava Metzia 87a) explains, each shekel used to pay for the plot was worth 2,500 standard shekels (Rashi). Thus, in the end, Avraham paid a total of one million standard shekels for the plot and caves.
 
Further to my notes on the previous verse, this means that in reality the full price paid for Hebron is a least 166 times the amount of the highest price paid for land by a Jewish leader (of a different size and for different reasons) in the Torah (Omri). To put it into today’s terms, “Ephron ripped Avraham off in a big way!”
 
This transaction serves to illuminate the character of the Father of Trust Avraham, while bringing into the light the true character of the Dust Man Ephron, a Child of Terror (Chet). The former is a son of the heavens (God, life eternal), while the latter remains a son of the dust (death).
 
 וַיָּ֣קָם׀ שְׂדֵ֣ה עֶפְר֗וֹן אֲשֶׁר֙ בַּמַּכְפֵּלָ֔ה אֲשֶׁ֖ר לִפְנֵ֣י מַמְרֵ֑א הַשָּׂדֶה֙ וְהַמְּעָרָ֣ה אֲשֶׁר־בּ֔וֹ וְכָל־הָעֵץ֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר בַּשָּׂדֶ֔ה אֲשֶׁ֥ר בְּכָל־גְּבֻל֖וֹ סָבִֽיב׃
 לְאַבְרָהָ֥ם לְמִקְנָ֖ה לְעֵינֵ֣י בְנֵי־חֵ֑ת בְּכֹ֖ל בָּאֵ֥י שַֽׁעַר־עִירֽוֹ׃
 
Gen 23:17 So the field of Ephron, which was in Machpeilah, which was before Mamre (Strength), the field, and the cave which was within it, and all the trees that were in the field, that were in all the border thereof round about, were secured (yakam: rose, elevated) Gen 23:18 unto Avraham for a possession in the presence of the children of Chet, before all that went in at the gate of his city.
 
Finally the land and its caves are secured legally before Ephron, the people of Chet and the elders of the gate and are recognized as belonging to Avraham and his offspring for a possession. No longer is it land upon which Avraham sojourns, it is now his lawful homeland. This historical record which is over 4000 years old is irrefutable proof of Israel’s ancestral claim to the caves and surrounding land in the city of Hebron.
 
This location is one of modern Judaism’s four holiest sites and is currently part of the Palestinian authority controlled land of southern Judea and Samaria. The 400 Jewish settlers who live there have need of the constant protection of up to 3,000 IDF (Israeli Defence Force) soldiers and this holy place has two separate worship areas, one for Jews and one for Muslims, kept separated by a bullet proof glass wall. Access for the average Jew is difficult at best and at worst, life threatening. The irony of calling the Jews who live in Hebron “settlers” is not lost on this Jew.
 
The Midrash states that the caves and surrounding land in Hebron are one of the three places that Scripture identifies as being testimony of the Jews’ irrefutable right to the possession of the land of Israel. The Midrash goes on to say that the cave of Machpeilah, the site of the Temple and the tomb of Joseph were all purchased without counter offers being made and with legal currency.
 
The phrase, “were confirmed/secured” uses the Hebrew, “yakam” literally, “rose”. Thus the Midrash interprets it to mean that through Avraham’s purchasing of the land it became elevated because it passed from the hands of the commoner Ephron into the hands of the king Avraham.
 
 וְאַחֲרֵי־כֵן֩ קָבַ֨ר אַבְרָהָ֜ם אֶת־שָׂרָ֣ה אִשְׁתּ֗וֹ אֶל־מְעָרַ֞ת שְׂדֵ֧ה הַמַּכְפֵּלָ֛ה עַל־פְּנֵ֥י מַמְרֵ֖א הִ֣וא חֶבְר֑וֹן בְּאֶ֖רֶץ כְּנָֽעַן׃
 וַיָּ֨קָם הַשָּׂדֶ֜ה וְהַמְּעָרָ֧ה אֲשֶׁר־בּ֛וֹ לְאַבְרָהָ֖ם לַאֲחֻזַּת־קָ֑בֶר מֵאֵ֖ת בְּנֵי־חֵֽת׃
 
Gen 23:19 And after this, Avraham interred Sarah his wife in the cave of the field of Machpeilah before Mamre - the same is Chevron - in the land of C’naan. Gen 23:20 And the field, and the cave that is within, were made secure (yakam: rose, elevated) unto Avraham for a possession as a burying-place by the children of Chet.
 
© 2025 Yaakov Ben Yehoshua

​Introduction:
 
Following the birth and weaning of the promised son Isaac and the expulsion of Hagar and Ishmael, Avraham had acquired the well of באר שבע Beer-sheva (Sevenfold Covenant), planted a grove of shady trees as a memorial of what ה" HaShem had done and remained in the land of the פְּלִשְׁתִּים P’lishtim (Greek immigrants to Canaan from the Aegean. This people group ceased to exist long before the second century C.E. renaming of the land of Israel by her Roman oppressors)  [Canaan]. There Avraham worships and gives glory to HaShem יהוה (YHVH) אל El (God) of מלך העולם (King of the Universe).
 
Now Avraham will face his final (Tenth) trial. All his former trials have been completed and the promise of their fulfilment has come to fruition. This trial is different, the ultimate fulfilment of it will not come to fruition at this time in history, and certainly not through the death of Isaac, although it will come to fruition as a result of Isaac’s bloodline. In fact, rather than lose his son, Avraham receives him back and a substitute (the Ram of God) takes his place.
 
This trial also differs from the former trials in its perceived morality. Avraham, who exhibits great concern for justice elsewhere, is now faced with the enigma of a just God’s request for the death of an innocent (Isaac).
 
It’s interesting to note that while Rashi and the Rambam differ on the order and specifics of a number of Avraham’s trials, they both list הָעֲקֵידָה‎ the Akeidah (The Binding of Isaac) as the final and most important of the trials of Avraham.
 
The chronology of the Biblical text shows us that Isaac was thirty seven years of age at the time of הָעֲקֵידָה‎ the Akeidah. Sarah was ninety (Gen. 17:17) at his birth and 127 at her death (Gen. 23:1). The Targum Yonatan explains that Satan told Sarah that Avraham had slaughtered Isaac and she cried out in grief and died. This would explain why Avraham and Isaac were not present at her death: “Avraham came to eulogize Sarah and bewail her” (Genesis 23:2). The Rabbis suggest that this is the reason that the account of Sarah’s death follows directly after הָעֲקֵידָה‎ the Akeidah (The Binding of Isaac).
 
The Pesikta Rabbati teaches that הָעֲקֵידָה‎ the Akeidah took place on Rosh Hashanah. Hence it has become the Torah reading for the second day of Rosh Hashanah in modern Rabbinic Judaism.
 
Before we begin to study the text we should take time to reflect on the nature of trial as understood in the ancient Hebrew text (נסה - nasah). In the context of this passage the English translation, “tempt” is entirely inappropriate. Likewise the English, “test.” God does not tempt, nor does He have any need of testing in order to find out something, to the contrary, He knows all, past, present and future because time and space are subject to Him, existing in Him. The trial or proving of Avraham is intended to reveal to Avraham the fruit of the faith he has received from God, and establish that faith in the substitutionary atonement of God.
 
“Let no one say when tempted, ‘I am tempted of God’: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither does He tempt any one: But every person is tempted, when they are drawn away of their own lust, and enticed. Then when lust has conceived, it brings forth sin: and sin, when it is fully realized, brings forth death.”
 
– Yaakov (James) 1:13-15
 
Given that God already knows the outcome of this trial, we cannot conclude that God is advocating human sacrifice as a common practice. To the contrary, He is foreshadowing the future manifestation of His own sacrificial love through Messiah Yeshua HaMelekh. Not a human sacrifice but the self-sacrificial act of the fully God and fully human Messiah Who gives Himself up for the sake of the repentant, having the authority and power to lay down His life and raise Himself from death (John 10:18).
 
The fact that this portion of the Torah is as central to Jewish theology as the Shema (Deut. 6:4-9, 11:13-21; Num. 15:37-41), shows that it is understood as the ultimate example of God’s relationship to Israel and her devotion to Him. Add to this that הָעֲקֵידָה‎ the Akeidah is a clear and irrefutable picture of the substitutionary sacrifice of עמנו - אל Imanu – El (God with us) as Messiah, and we have a connection that binds (pun intended) together both the ethnic Jewish people and the believing nations of the world.
 
This may well be one of the most important studies you ever engage in. Read carefully, listen well, qualify your conclusions, and above all else, trust God.
 
 וַיְהִ֗י אַחַר֙ הַדְּבָרִ֣ים הָאֵ֔לֶּה וְהָ֣אֱלֹהִ֔ים נִסָּ֖ה אֶת־אַבְרָהָ֑ם וַיֹּ֣אמֶר אֵלָ֔יו אַבְרָהָ֖ם וַיֹּ֥אמֶר הִנֵּֽנִי׃
 
Gen 22:1 And it came to pass after הַדְּבָרִים ha-d’varim (the words) these things, that הָאֱלֹהִ֔ים Ha-Elohim (the God, Judge) did נִסָּה nesah prove Avraham (Father of many nations), and said to him, “Avraham”: and he said, “הִנֵּנִי Hineiniy (I’m here, ready, prepared, willing), here I am.”
 
These events take place following the words (הַדְּבָרִים ha-d’varim), “And Avraham planted a grove in באר שבע Beer-sheva, and called there on the name of HaShem, the everlasting God. And Avraham sojourned in the land of Philistines' many days.” (Gen 21:33:34)
 
The text says, “Ha-Elohim” (The God) for good reason. There must be no misunderstanding regarding the use of Elohim here. This generic name for God, also used to name gods and judges, is pretexted here by the definite article, “the.”
 
The Midrash renders the word נִסָּה nesah as, “elevated” like a banner/miracle (נס - neis). Thus we could read, “The God elevated Avraham.” Following the events of הָעֲקֵידָה‎ the Akeidah God doesn’t speak directly to Avraham again except in the Angel/Messenger. This fact further illuminates the importance of these events. There is something in the story of the binding that acts as a catalyst for the perfecting of faith. We are reminded that, “the life is in the blood” which is given on the מִזבֵּחַ mizbeach (altar) for the remission of sin (Lev. 17:11). It makes sense therefore, that the substitutionary sacrifice in this account is symbolic of something much greater than the simple death of a ram.
 
Avraham’s response to God affirms the true character of the father of trust. The Hebrew הִנֵּנִי Hineiniy has no English equivalent. It denotes humility, readiness, willingness, obedience, receipt, openness etc.
 
 וַיֹּ֡אמֶר קַח־נָ֠א אֶת־בִּנְךָ֨ אֶת־יְחִֽידְךָ֤ אֲשֶׁר־אָהַ֙בְתָּ֙ אֶת־יִצְחָ֔ק וְלֶךְ־לְךָ֔ אֶל־אֶ֖רֶץ הַמֹּרִיָּ֑ה וְהַעֲלֵ֤הוּ שָׁם֙ לְעֹלָ֔ה עַ֚ל אַחַ֣ד הֶֽהָרִ֔ים אֲשֶׁ֖ר אֹמַ֥ר אֵלֶֽיךָ׃
 
Gen 22:2 And He (God) said, “fetch now your son, your only son Yitzchak (He laughs), whom you love, and וְלֶךְ־לְךָ lech lecha (walk, go forth) into the land of הַמֹּרִיָּה the Moriyah (seen by YHVH: ראה ra’ah & יה Yah); and ascend there, offering him there for a burnt offering upon one of the mountains which I will tell you of.
 
We should keep in mind that Avraham is 137 years old and Isaac 37, meaning that none of this could be forced upon Isaac. He must choose to accept every instruction of his father willingly. This is both an echo and prophetic ripple that reveals the Mashiach and Only Son of HaShem, Who is slain before the creation of the world (Revelation 13:8).
 
The words, “your son, your only son Yitzchak (He laughs), whom you love” are a glimpse into the future, when God would speak over His Son Yeshua saying, “This is my Son whom I love, in Him I am delighted!” (Matt. 3:17).
 
The unique identity of the Son Yeshua is further clarified in Yochanan (John) 1:14:
 
“And הדבר Ha-Davar the Word became flesh and dwelt among us. We looked upon His כָּבוֹד kavod (glory), the glory of the one and only Son from the Father, full of חֶסֶד chesed (grace, loving kindness) and אֶמֶת emet (truth).”
 
- Yochanan (John) 1:14
 
The phrase, “lech lecha” (walk and go forth) occurs only here and in 12:1, the initial instruction of God to Avraham, thus tying the two narratives together to show the completeness of Avraham’s call and purpose in God. This instruction to go up to sacrifice requires courage equal to the instruction to give up everything and follow God. We should pause a moment to consider the fact that התלמידים the Talmidim (Disciples) of Yeshua responded to the call to follow God’s Messiah, but with the exception of Yochanan (John) and the women closest to Yeshua, they were not able to muster the courage to go up to the sacrifice with Him.
 
Mt Moriyah (seen by YHVH: ראה ra’ah & יה Yah), is the Temple Mount (2 Chronicles 3:1). Onkelos renders, “go forth into the land of Divine service.” It’s thought that he takes Moriyah to be derived from מוֹר mor (myrrh), which is one of the spices of the Temple service (Rashi). This connects the Akeidah to the Temple Mount and the foundation stone האבן, which tradition identifies as the stone on which Isaac was laid.
 
 וַיַּשְׁכֵּ֨ם אַבְרָהָ֜ם בַּבֹּ֗קֶר וַֽיַּחֲבֹשׁ֙ אֶת־חֲמֹר֔וֹ וַיִּקַּ֞ח אֶת־שְׁנֵ֤י נְעָרָיו֙ אִתּ֔וֹ וְאֵ֖ת יִצְחָ֣ק בְּנ֑וֹ וַיְבַקַּע֙ עֲצֵ֣י עֹלָ֔ה וַיָּ֣קָם וַיֵּ֔לֶךְ אֶל־הַמָּק֖וֹם אֲשֶׁר־אָֽמַר־ל֥וֹ הָאֱלֹהִֽים׃
 
Gen 22:3 And Avraham rose up early in the morning, and saddled his male donkey, and took two of נְעָרָיו֙ nearayv his young men with him, and Yitzchak his son, and chopped the wood for the burnt offering, and rose up, and went toward the place of which God had spoken.
 
The phrase, “rose up early,” indicates Avraham’s immediate obedience to God’s instruction.
 
The fact that Avraham saddled his own donkey is noteworthy. This was the job of a servant. Avraham was so intent on obedience to God that he ignored his personal dignity. The text also infers that it was Avraham who chopped the wood.
 
It is important to understand that the Hebrew נְעָרָיו֙ nearayv refers to a young man between the ages of 12 and 40 years. The same word used here to refer to Avraham’s servants is also used to refer to Isaac later in the text.
 
The Midrash says that the two young men Avraham took with him were Eliezer and Ishmael, who was visiting his father, having now lived in Paran for some time. It is an endearing thought, an illumination of reconciliation and the help of God. The names of these two, “God helps” and “Heard by God” are both beautiful representations of the character of God as it unfolds in the remainder of this historical account.
 
There are those who see contradiction and even hypocrisy in the actions of Avraham. They say that he pleaded for the innocent when God was about to destroy Sodom but here he is blindly obedient to God’s command to kill his innocent son Isaac. However, there is an important distinction between these two events. First, there were in the end, no innocent ones in Sodom. In fact, it is true to say that even those God spared were not innocent. Second, the destruction of Sodom was a judgement against sin, whereas the present instruction is related to sacrifice. God is not commanding a judgement, He is initiating a sacrifice. In order for sacrifice to be understood within the framework of redemptive substitution, that which is offered must be blameless and without blemish. Therefore, Isaac’s comparative innocence is essential to this sacrificial instruction and helps to explain Avraham’s willing obedience.
 
 בַּיּ֣וֹם הַשְּׁלִישִׁ֗י וַיִּשָּׂ֨א אַבְרָהָ֧ם אֶת־עֵינָ֛יו וַיַּ֥רְא אֶת־הַמָּק֖וֹם מֵרָחֹֽק׃
 
Gen 22:4 Then on the third day Avraham lifted up his eyes, and saw the place far off.
 
The third day is an obvious foreshadowing to the death and resurrection of both Yonah (Jonah) and Yeshua (Jesus). It is not, as some erroneously suggest, an idiom. Third day in Hebrew means three days have passed, just as it does in English. There is not one example so far as I’m aware, of and idiomatic use of the phrases, “third day” or “three days,” within the meta narrative of Scripture. Those who say that the historical story of Jonah is simply a myth must also call Yeshua a deluded liar (Matt. 12:39-40). In short, they are blasphemers.
 
The phrase, “lifted up his eyes,” is connected to Avraham’s receiving God’s previous promise of land, and to the provision of God through sight. The mountain which is already seen by God is now being seen by Avraham. The Hebrew ראה ra’ah (see) is the same root being used in verse 8 where it is usually translated as, “provide.” Provision and sight are synonymous terms in this context.
 
Avraham saw the cloud of God’s presence over the mountain, thus recognizing that it was the destination he was seeking (Pirkei D’Rabbi Eliezer).
 
 וַיֹּ֨אמֶר אַבְרָהָ֜ם אֶל־נְעָרָ֗יו שְׁבוּ־לָכֶ֥ם פֹּה֙ עִֽם־הַחֲמ֔וֹר וַאֲנִ֣י וְהַנַּ֔עַר נֵלְכָ֖ה עַד־כֹּ֑ה וְנִֽשְׁתַּחֲוֶ֖ה וְנָשׁ֥וּבָה אֲלֵיכֶֽם׃
 
Gen 22:5 And Avraham said to his נְעָרָ֗יו nearayv young men, “Stay here with the donkey; and I and וְהַנַּ֔עַר ha-na’ar the young man will go yonder and bow down, and then we will return to you.
 
We should take special note of the term, נַּעַר “Na’ar” which is used here of both Avraham’s young men (servants) and the young man Isaac. This noun can refer to a young man between the ages of 12 and 40, and should not be presumed to refer to a young child as is inferred by numerous English translations which use, “lad” or “boy” to translate this complex Hebrew noun. In some cases this translation seems intentionally misleading, as in the KJV translation, which translates the same term, “young men” when referring to Avraham’s servants but, “lad” when referring to Isaac. This is at best inconsistent.
 
“And then we will return,” is plural. Avraham did not say, “and then I will return.” This shows the trust that Avraham had in the promise of God (Gen. 21:12). Avraham believed he would return with Isaac in tow. The Jewish writer of the book of Hebrews affirms Avraham’s core belief:
 
“In trust Avraham, when he was being proved, offered up Yitzchak. Yes, he who had received the promises was offering up his one and only son— the one about whom it was said, “Through Yitzchak your offspring shall be named.” He reasoned that God was able to raise Yitzchak up even from the dead—and in a sense, he did receive him back from there.”
 
 – Hebrews 11:17-19 [Author’s translation]
 
 וַיִּקַּ֨ח אַבְרָהָ֜ם אֶת־עֲצֵ֣י הָעֹלָ֗ה וַיָּ֙שֶׂם֙ עַל־יִצְחָ֣ק בְּנ֔וֹ וַיִּקַּ֣ח בְּיָד֔וֹ אֶת־הָאֵ֖שׁ וְאֶת־הַֽמַּאֲכֶ֑לֶת וַיֵּלְכ֥וּ שְׁנֵיהֶ֖ם יַחְדָּֽו׃
 
Gen 22:6 And Avraham took the wood of the burnt offering, and laid it upon Yitzchak his son; and he took הָאֵשׁ haeish the fire (holy fire, altar fire) in his hand, and a knife; and they walked on together.
 
The Midrash compares Isaac’s burden of wood to the Roman practice of crucifixion:
 
“It is like a person who carries his cross on his own shoulder”
 
–Bereishit Rabbah 56:3
 
There is an undeniable link to the Messiah Yeshua:
 
“They (Roman soldiers) took Yeshua, therefore, and He went out, bearing His own cross, to the place called the Skull, which is called in a language of the Hebrews, Golgotha (Skull).”
 
–Yochanan (John) 19:17 [Author’s translation]
 
The phrase, “And they walked on together,” denotes harmony of purpose. The same phrase is repeated in verse 8, by which time Isaac knew that he was to be the sacrifice.
 
Father and son going together is a figurative allusion to the cross of Messiah, Who says, “I and the Father are One!” Yeshua, and the Father are equally present on the cross. The pseudo-Christian nonsense “the Father turned His face away” is an indictment on the poor theology of so many, so called worship songs.
 
The following portion of Yeshayahu (Isaiah) is conveniently left out of the Haf-Tarah (filling/completing/illumination of the Torah) readings in the modern rabbinical Torah reading cycle. However, it was part of the triannual Torah cycle of the first century. It conveys a sense of the intimate agreement between Father and Son, and the willingness of the sacrificial appointee.
 
“He was oppressed (tormented), and he was afflicted, and did not open his mouth; kaseh like a lamb latevach led to the slaughter, ucheracheil and like a ewe lifneiy before the face of its shearers is silent, so he did not open his mouth. Yet HaShem (YHVH: Mercy) chafeitz 
desired to bruise (crush) him; hecheliy He has put him to grief; im-tasiym with his appointment as an offering for guilt nafsho by his soul (life, being), yireh he will see his zera offspring; ya’ariych he will prolong his yamiym days; ve’cheifetz and the desire of HaShem (YHVH: Mercy) beyado in his hand yitzlach will advance, rush, succeed, progress, prosper.”
 
–Yeshayahu (Isaiah) 53:7, 10 [Author’s translation]
 
 וַיֹּ֨אמֶר יִצְחָ֜ק אֶל־אַבְרָהָ֤ם אָבִיו֙ וַיֹּ֣אמֶר אָבִ֔י וַיֹּ֖אמֶר הִנֶּ֣נִּֽי בְנִ֑י וַיֹּ֗אמֶר הִנֵּ֤ה הָאֵשׁ֙ וְהָ֣עֵצִ֔ים וְאַיֵּ֥ה הַשֶּׂ֖ה לְעֹלָֽה׃
 
Gen 22:7 And Yitzchak said, “Avraham my father,” and continued saying, “My father”: and he (Avraham) responded, “הִנֶּנִּי Hineniy Here I am, my son.” And he (Yitzchak) said, “Behold the fire and the wood: but where is the lamb for a burnt offering?”
 
Up to this point Isaac believed that they were going to make a sacrifice to God and would thus find a lamb for this purpose while on their journey.
 
 וַיֹּ֙אמֶר֙ אַבְרָהָ֔ם אֱלֹהִ֞ים יִרְאֶה־לּ֥וֹ הַשֶּׂ֛ה לְעֹלָ֖ה בְּנִ֑י וַיֵּלְכ֥וּ שְׁנֵיהֶ֖ם יַחְדָּֽו׃
 
Gen 22:8 And Avraham said, “אֱלֹהִים Elohim (God) יִרְאֶה־לּוֹ (yireh lo root: ראה ra’ah) will provide himself a lamb for a burnt offering:” so they walked on together.
 
Avraham’s trust, as illuminated in Hebrews 11:17, remains. He firmly believes that God will bring about a miracle. Once again, the phrase, “so they walked on together,” conveys a unity of purpose.
 
The phrase, “אֱלֹהִים יִרְאֶה Elohim yireh” (God provides) links the seeing (ra’ah) of God to His provision (יִרְאֶה yireh). Thus we can also read, “Elohim sees the lamb for the burnt offering.”
 
Additionally, one could read, “Elohim will provide himself, a lamb for a burnt offering.”
 
True love and sacrifice are intrinsically linked. If your love for another doesn’t include a willingness to sacrifice your own needs, even yourself for their good, then it’s not love.
 
 וַיָּבֹ֗אוּ אֶֽל־הַמָּקוֹם֮ אֲשֶׁ֣ר אָֽמַר־ל֣וֹ הָאֱלֹהִים֒ וַיִּ֨בֶן שָׁ֤ם אַבְרָהָם֙ אֶת־הַמִּזְבֵּ֔חַ וַֽיַּעֲרֹ֖ךְ אֶת־הָעֵצִ֑ים וַֽיַּעֲקֹד֙ אֶת־יִצְחָ֣ק בְּנ֔וֹ וַיָּ֤שֶׂם אֹתוֹ֙ עַל־הַמִּזְבֵּ֔חַ מִמַּ֖עַל לָעֵצִֽים׃
 
Gen 22:9 And they came to the place which הָאֱלֹהִים Ha-Elohim (the God) had told him of; and Avraham built אֶת־הַמִּזְבֵּחַ the specific altar (et ha-mizbeach: Root, זבח zabach – slaughter, kill) there, and laid the wood in order, וַֽיַּעֲקֹד֙ vaya’akod and bound Yitzchak his son, and laid him on the altar upon the wood.
 
It’s from this verse that the Hebrew title for this passage, “הָעֲקֵידָה‎ Ha-Akeidah” (The Binding) is derived.
 
The altar, הַמִּזְבֵּחַ ha-mizbeach, is intended for the shedding of blood. On every occasion that this term is used in the Torah without qualifying terms, it refers to an altar of slaughter. It is fitting that on the Mountain that would later become the site of the daily Temple offerings, this pivotal sacrifice is about to take place.
 
At the age of 137, Avraham could not have bound Isaac (37) without his consent.
 
“Father, I am a strong young man and you are old. I’m afraid that when I see the slaughtering knife in your hand I might flinch and possibly do you harm. I may also injure myself and become unfit for sacrifice. Or an involuntary movement by me might prevent you from performing the ritual slaughter properly. Therefore, bind me well, so that at the final moment I will not fail in my filial honour and respect, thereby not fulfilling the commandment properly.”
 
–Midrash
 
The prophet Yeshayahu (Isaiah) speaks of Yeshua in the following way:
 
“He was oppressed, though he humbled himself and opened not his mouth; as a lamb that is led to the slaughter, and as a sheep that before her shearers is dumb; yea, he opened not his mouth.”
 
– Yeshayahu (Isaiah) 53:7
 
 וַיִּשְׁלַ֤ח אַבְרָהָם֙ אֶת־יָד֔וֹ וַיִּקַּ֖ח אֶת־הַֽמַּאֲכֶ֑לֶת לִשְׁחֹ֖ט אֶת־בְּנֽוֹ׃
 
Gen 22:10 And Avraham stretched forth his hand, and took the knife to slay his son.
 
The Midrash says that as Avraham reached for the knife, tears feel from his eyes into Isaac’s eyes.
 
The Targum Yonatan records that Isaac looked up to see the Angels on high, while Avraham was yet unable to see them.
 
Rashi notes that the Angels also wept and their tears fell into Isaac’s eyes.
 
In this moving account there is an intimate, intrinsic grief which is shared by The Father God, the Angel/Messenger of Hashem, Avraham and Isaac.
 
 וַיִּקְרָ֨א אֵלָ֜יו מַלְאַ֤ךְ יְהוָה֙ מִן־הַשָּׁמַ֔יִם וַיֹּ֖אמֶר אַבְרָהָ֣ם׀ אַבְרָהָ֑ם וַיֹּ֖אמֶר הִנֵּֽנִי׃
 
Gen 22:11 And Malakh (Messenger) HaShem (YHVH: Mercy) called to him (Avraham) from the heavens, and said, “Avraham, Avraham:” and he responded, “Hineiniy (I’m here, ready, prepared, willing), here I am.”
 
The Hebrew text can be read literally as, “And calling toward (Avraham), Messenger HaShem.” This should be understood to mean that the Messenger (Angel) is a manifest representation of HaShem Himself.
 
The Angel of Hashem is the manifestation of the post resurrection, transcendent (unbound by time and space,) trans-locational Messiah Yeshua, Who is witnessing here the living symbolism of His own sacrificial death.
 
 וַיֹּ֗אמֶר אַל־תִּשְׁלַ֤ח יָֽדְךָ֙ אֶל־הַנַּ֔עַר וְאַל־תַּ֥עַשׂ ל֖וֹ מְא֑וּמָּה כִּ֣י׀ עַתָּ֣ה יָדַ֗עְתִּי כִּֽי־יְרֵ֤א אֱלֹהִים֙ אַ֔תָּה וְלֹ֥א חָשַׂ֛כְתָּ אֶת־בִּנְךָ֥ אֶת־יְחִידְךָ֖ מִמֶּֽנִּי׃
 
Gen 22:12 And He (HaMalakh HaShem) said, “Don’t lay your hand upon ha-na’ar the young man, neither do anything to him: for atah until this time yada’tiy I have known, that you are in awe of Elohim (God), seeing you have not withheld your son, your only son from Me.
 
Not even a hair of Isaac’s head was harmed. God speaks in a timely fashion and Avraham responds in the same manner with which he began this journey of obedience, thus answering the question of faith.
 
The Angel of Hashem, Who is speaking to Avraham repeats the phrase, “your son, your only one.”
 
I believe the traditional English translation, “for now I know that you fear me” is misleading. The phrase, “now I know” infers that at one time He did not know. This contradicts the essence of God’s character, His omniscience (Isaiah 46:9-10, 40:13-14; Psalm 33:13-15, 139:1-3, 139:4, 139:15-16, 147:4-5; Job 21:22, 37:16; 1 Chronicles 28:9; Romans 11:33; Hebrews 4:13; Luke 12:7;  1 John 3:20; Matthew 10:29-30). In fact, God need learn nothing from these events. He has already seen them concluded. If we read, “For until this time I have known” we are more inclined to interpret the statement as an assurance to Avraham rather than a declaration of discovery on the part of HaShem and His Angel.
 
 וַיִּשָּׂ֨א אַבְרָהָ֜ם אֶת־עֵינָ֗יו וַיַּרְא֙ וְהִנֵּה־אַ֔יִל אַחַ֕ר נֶאֱחַ֥ז בַּסְּבַ֖ךְ בְּקַרְנָ֑יו וַיֵּ֤לֶךְ אַבְרָהָם֙ וַיִּקַּ֣ח אֶת־הָאַ֔יִל וַיַּעֲלֵ֥הוּ לְעֹלָ֖ה תַּ֥חַת בְּנֽוֹ׃
 
Gen 22:13 And Avraham lifted up his eyes, and looked, and behold behind him a ram caught in a thicket by his horns: and Avraham went and took the ram, and offered him up for a burnt offering tachat instead, for the sake, as a substitute of his son.
 
Once again, the phrase, “lifted up his eyes” is connected to Avraham’s receiving God’s previous promise of land and to the provision of God through sight. The mountain which is already seen by God is now being seen by Avraham. The Hebrew ראה ra’ah (see) is the same root being used in verse 8 where it is usually translated as, “provide.” Provision and sight are synonymous terms in this context.
 
A ram caught in a thicket may be without obvious signs of blemish, such as discoloured wool or bodily deformity, and thus qualifies for the sacrifice as ritually clean. However, it is unlikely that the ram was without scratches and bleeding from the time spent in the thicket. Nor does cutting from without disqualify the sacrificial animal as being without blemish. This is a picture of the crown of thorns which was pressed down onto the head of our Messiah Yeshua.
 
The importance of a ram over a lamb here, is to make clear that the future substitutionary sacrifice would be made by a male.
 
 וַיִּקְרָ֧א אַבְרָהָ֛ם שֵֽׁם־הַמָּק֥וֹם הַה֖וּא יְהוָ֣ה׀ יִרְאֶ֑ה אֲשֶׁר֙ יֵאָמֵ֣ר הַיּ֔וֹם בְּהַ֥ר יְהוָ֖ה יֵרָאֶֽה׃
 
Gen 22:14 And Avraham called the name of that place YHVH Yir’eh: as it is said to this day, “In the mount of the HaShem (Mercy) it shall be provided/seen (yeiraeh).
 
The original name of this place was Shalem, the name given to it by Shem, son of Noach (whom the sages identify as Melkiy-tzedek [King of Righteousness], the king of Shalem). The Midrash says that following the Akeidah, when Avraham named the place Adonay Yireh, HaShem in deference to both Shem and Avraham, named the place Yerushalayim (Jerusalem).
 
 וַיִּקְרָ֛א מַלְאַ֥ךְ יְהוָ֖ה אֶל־אַבְרָהָ֑ם שֵׁנִ֖ית מִן־הַשָּׁמָֽיִם׃
 וַיֹּ֕אמֶר בִּ֥י נִשְׁבַּ֖עְתִּי נְאֻם־יְהוָ֑ה כִּ֗י יַ֚עַן אֲשֶׁ֤ר עָשִׂ֙יתָ֙ אֶת־הַדָּבָ֣ר הַזֶּ֔ה וְלֹ֥א חָשַׂ֖כְתָּ אֶת־בִּנְךָ֥ אֶת־יְחִידֶֽךָ
 
Gen 22:15 And the Malakh (Messenger, Angel) HaShem (YHVH: Mercy) called to Avraham out of the heavens the second time, Gen 22:16 And said, “By myself have I sworn, says HaShem (YHVH: Mercy), because you have done ha-davar this thing, according to the word, and have not withheld your son, your only son:”
 
The Angel of Hashem speaks a second time after the sacrifice of the ram has been performed. The familiar reprise, “your son, your only son,” rings out again in affirmation of the faith that Avraham has exhibited and as a prophetic foreshadowing of the Messiah.
 
“16 For indeed people swear an oath by one greater, and taking an oath serves as confirmation to them, an end of all strife, dispute, contradiction between them. 17 In the same way God, desiring more abundantly to demonstrate to the heirs of the promise the fact that His purpose is immutable, unchangeable, confirmed it with an oath, 18 so that by two immutable, unchangeable things in which it is impossible for God to lie, we might have strong comfort who have fled for refuge to take hold of the hope set before us.”
 
–Hebrews 6:16-18 [Author’s translation]
 
 כִּֽי־בָרֵ֣ךְ אֲבָרֶכְךָ֗ וְהַרְבָּ֨ה אַרְבֶּ֤ה אֶֽת־זַרְעֲךָ֙ כְּכוֹכְבֵ֣י הַשָּׁמַ֔יִם וְכַח֕וֹל אֲשֶׁ֖ר עַל־שְׂפַ֣ת הַיָּ֑ם וְיִרַ֣שׁ זַרְעֲךָ֔ אֵ֖ת שַׁ֥עַר אֹיְבָֽיו׃
 
Gen 22:17 “In blessing I will bless you, and in making great (multiplying) I will make great (multiply) your seed as the stars of the heavens, and as the sand which is upon the sea shore; and your seed shall possess the gate of his enemy;
 
The language of this blessing mirrors that of several previous addresses (Gen. 12:3, 13:16, 15:5). Here it is said in confirmation of the promise which God saw completed in Avraham, before Avraham had come to the place of completing his trust through the action of bringing his son and heir as a sacrifice before HaShem.
 
Notice that the seed is singular, he will possess the gate (singular) of his enemy.
 
What is different about this blessing is that it adds the clause, “and your seed shall possess the gate of his enemy.” It seems that this clause has not been added until now because the symbolism of the sacrificial act of the Akeidah had to take place in order to reveal the nature of the future seed (Messiah), Who would possess the gate of humanity’s greatest enemy, death.
 
 וְהִתְבָּרֲכ֣וּ בְזַרְעֲךָ֔ כֹּ֖ל גּוֹיֵ֣י הָאָ֑רֶץ עֵ֕קֶב אֲשֶׁ֥ר שָׁמַ֖עְתָּ בְּקֹלִֽי׃
 
Gen 22:18 And in your seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; because you have heard שָׁמַ֖עְתָּ Shamata in My voice בְּקֹלִֽי bekoliy.
 
It is through Yeshua, the greater son of Avraham and of David, the Messiah and sacrificial lamb of God, that all the nations will be blessed.
 
Avraham, Shamata (listened, received, understood, comprehended) and welcomed the kol (voice) of HaShem. Thus, he became the father of all who would trust God and the first Hebrew, the one who received the promise of Israel’s coming redemption.
 
 וַיָּ֤שָׁב אַבְרָהָם֙ אֶל־נְעָרָ֔יו וַיָּקֻ֛מוּ וַיֵּלְכ֥וּ יַחְדָּ֖ו אֶל־בְּאֵ֣ר שָׁ֑בַע וַיֵּ֥שֶׁב אַבְרָהָ֖ם בִּבְאֵ֥ר שָֽׁבַע׃
 
Gen 22:19 So Avraham returned unto his young men, and they rose up and went together to Beer-sheva (Well of Seven, Well of Rest, Covenant of Seven); and Avraham dwelt at Beer-sheva.
 
All four men, “rose up” in immediate obedience and “went together” with harmony of purpose, to the well of sevenfold blessing, the mayim chayim (living waters) of covenant promise.
 
 וַיְהִ֗י אַחֲרֵי֙ הַדְּבָרִ֣ים הָאֵ֔לֶּה וַיֻּגַּ֥ד לְאַבְרָהָ֖ם לֵאמֹ֑ר הִ֠נֵּה יָלְדָ֨ה מִלְכָּ֥ה גַם־הִ֛וא בָּנִ֖ים לְנָח֥וֹר אָחִֽיךָ׃
 
Gen 22:20 And it came to pass after ha-d’avriym (these words, these things), that it was told Avraham, saying, “Behold, Milcah (Queen), she has also born children to your brother (uncle, male relative etc.) Nachor (Snorting);
 
The promise of multiplying and the prospering of Avraham’s progeny is immediately supported by the news of a bride for Isaac.
 
The genealogy of Nachor’s family has been kept till now in order to coincide with the events of the Akeidah. Thus showing God’s providence in the birth of Isaac’s future wife and the maintaining of the godly bloodline.
 
It is fitting that Rivkah (captivating, knotted cord, tied up, secured, bound), Isaac’s future bride is born to Milcah (Queen). Just as Sarah (Princess, Queen) had become the Queen of the promise, Rivkah, who has been born to a queen, will become the binding (Akeidah) of the promise, securing it through the birth of Yaakov/Israel.
 
 אֶת־ע֥וּץ בְּכֹר֖וֹ וְאֶת־בּ֣וּז אָחִ֑יו וְאֶת־קְמוּאֵ֖ל אֲבִ֥י אֲרָֽם׃
 וְאֶת־כֶּ֣שֶׂד וְאֶת־חֲז֔וֹ וְאֶת־פִּלְדָּ֖שׁ וְאֶת־יִדְלָ֑ף וְאֵ֖ת בְּתוּאֵֽל׃
 וּבְתוּאֵ֖ל יָלַ֣ד אֶת־רִבְקָ֑ה שְׁמֹנָ֥ה אֵ֙לֶּה֙ יָלְדָ֣ה מִלְכָּ֔ה לְנָח֖וֹר אֲחִ֥י אַבְרָהָֽם׃
וּפִֽילַגְשׁ֖וֹ וּשְׁמָ֣הּ רְאוּמָ֑ה וַתֵּ֤לֶד גַּם־הִוא֙ אֶת־טֶ֣בַח וְאֶת־גַּ֔חַם וְאֶת־תַּ֖חַשׁ וְאֶֽת־מַעֲכָֽה׃ 
 
Gen 22:21 Uz (Wooded, counsel) his firstborn, and Buz (contempt) his brother, and Kemuel (Kum – El: Risen in God, Raised by God) the father of Aram (exalted), Gen 22:22 And Kesed (increase), and Chazo (vision), and Pildash (flame of fire), and Yidlaf (weeping), and Betuel (Bet-El: Dwells in God). Gen 22:23 And Betuel (Dwells in God) produced Rivkah (captivating, knotted cord, tied up, secured): these eight Milcah (Queen) did bear to Nachor (snorting), Avraham's brother (uncle, male relative etc.). Gen 22:24 And his concubine, whose name was Reumah (elevated, arise), she bore also Tevah (slaughter), and Gacham (burning), and Tachash (animal hide), and Maachah (Pressure, squeezed, crushed: lit. She has pressed).
 
Rivkah, in addition to being the daughter of a queen (Milcah) is also the daughter of one who dwells in God (Betuel).
 
© 2025 Yaakov Ben Yehoshua

​Introduction:
 
Soon after the promise of the heir had been reaffirmed by God to Avraham and Sarah, S’dom was destroyed and Sarah was abducted by Avimelech, her promised progeny almost defiled by the seed of Avimelech. However, God protected Sarah’s purity and secured her womb for Avraham’s seed. Now, having suffered many trials, both Avraham and Sarah can rejoice in the delivery of the son and heir, Isaac. But even this event will prove Avraham’s resolve as he is asked to part with his beloved son Ishmael, born to him by Hagar, Sarah’s maidservant.
 
The literary devices of Hebraic repetition and counterpoint are prolific in this chapter: an indication of things firmly decided and implemented by HaShem. Laughter is given to Sarah in the form of a son and with laughter Ishmael mocks the heir Isaac. Hagar sits a bow’s length away from Ishmael and her son subsequently becomes a bowman. The well of seven is a refuge for Hagar and a place of contention between Avraham and Avimelech, and finally secured by Avraham through a sevenfold covenant of rest.
 
The Holy name YHVH begins and ends the account as an allusion to the Mercy of God and the Judge Elohim, is seen throughout.
 
Ultimately God’s will is done and the promised heir Isaac is made secure in the bosom of the father of faith Avraham, protected from the mocking laughter of his future enemies (progeny of Ishmael) through the prophetic voice of his mother Sarah, the great matriarch and princess established by God in the ancestry of Israel.
 וַֽיהוָ֛ה פָּקַ֥ד אֶת־שָׂרָ֖ה כַּאֲשֶׁ֣ר אָמָ֑ר וַיַּ֧עַשׂ יְהוָ֛ה לְשָׂרָ֖ה כַּאֲשֶׁ֥ר דִּבֵּֽר׃
 וַתַּהַר֩ וַתֵּ֨לֶד שָׂרָ֧ה לְאַבְרָהָ֛ם בֵּ֖ן לִזְקֻנָ֑יו לַמּוֹעֵ֕ד אֲשֶׁר־דִּבֶּ֥ר אֹת֖וֹ אֱלֹהִֽים׃
 
Gen 21:1 And HaShem (YHVH: Mercy) cared for Sarah (Princess), visiting her as He had said, and HaShem (YHVH: Mercy) made in Sarah that of which He had spoken. Gen 21:2 For Sarah conceived, and bore Avraham (father of nations, father of trust) a son in his old age, at the set time (moeid) of which God had spoken to him.
 
Tradition holds that Sarah conceived on the day of Rosh Hashanah (Talmud Bavliy Rosh Hashanah. 11a.), as a result, the present narrative is the Torah reading for that holy day.
 
“The Lord did miracles for Sarah as He had spoken.”
 
–Yerushalayim & Yonatan Targums 2nd Century C.E
 
It is God as Mercy Who begins this important account. He cares for Sarah and fulfils His promise to her.
 
“In trust, agreement, firm belief, also Sarah herself received the ability to conceive seed, and delivered a child when she was past age, because she judged Him Who had promised, to be trustworthy.”
 
–Hebrews 11:11 [Author’s translation]
 
The similarities to the later birth of the Messiah are prophetic in nature. The differences equally important. Sarah, who had doubted Hashem’s angel now gives birth in comfortable circumstances and with great joy. While Mariyam (Mary), who received Gavriel’s message with great joy and firm belief, would give birth in a time of turmoil and later suffer the loss of her son, only to receive Him again with even greater joy than any experienced by Sarah. All this illuminates the metanarrative of God’s redemptive plan, which He decided upon before the creation of the world.
 
Verses 2 & 3, and later 25:19, emphasis the fact that Avraham is the father of Isaac. This is to reassure the reader that despite his age it was his fertile seed that impregnated Sarah and not that of the wicked king Avimelech.
 
וַיִּקְרָ֨א אַבְרָהָ֜ם אֶֽת־שֶׁם־בְּנ֧וֹ הַנּֽוֹלַד־ל֛וֹ אֲשֶׁר־יָלְדָה־לּ֥וֹ שָׂרָ֖ה יִצְחָֽק׃
וַיָּ֤מָל אַבְרָהָם֙ אֶת־יִצְחָ֣ק בְּנ֔וֹ בֶּן־שְׁמֹנַ֖ת יָמִ֑ים כַּאֲשֶׁ֛ר צִוָּ֥ה אֹת֖וֹ אֱלֹהִֽים׃
 
Gen 21:3 And Avraham called the name of his son that was born to him, whom Sarah bore to him, Yitzchak (Isaac: he laughs). Gen 21:4 And Avraham circumcised his son Yitzchak at eight days old, as God had commanded him.
 
The name Yitzchak is the first of many uses of the Hebrew root צחק tz’chok (laughter). Avraham was given the name by God in 17:19. There is much to learn from the ways laughter is used both in joyous proclamation and in sinful mockery. The halakhic applications abound. 
 
וְאַבְרָהָ֖ם בֶּן־מְאַ֣ת שָׁנָ֑ה בְּהִוָּ֣לֶד ל֔וֹ אֵ֖ת יִצְחָ֥ק בְּנֽוֹ׃
 
Gen 21:5 And Avraham was a hundred years old, when his son Yitzchak was born to him.
 
The birth of Isaac took place 25 years after Avraham departed from Charan (Genesis 12:4).
 
וַתֹּ֣אמֶר שָׂרָ֔ה צְחֹ֕ק עָ֥שָׂה לִ֖י אֱלֹהִ֑ים כָּל־הַשֹּׁמֵ֖עַ יִֽצְחַק־לִֽי׃
וַתֹּ֗אמֶר מִ֤י מִלֵּל֙ לְאַבְרָהָ֔ם הֵינִ֥יקָה בָנִ֖ים שָׂרָ֑ה כִּֽי־יָלַ֥דְתִּי בֵ֖ן לִזְקֻנָֽיו׃
 
Gen 21:6 And Sarah said, “Tz’chok (Laughter) has been made for me by Elohim (God: Judge), so that all that hear will y’tzchak liy (laugh) with me.” Gen 21:7 And she said, “Who would have said that for Avraham, sons would be nursed by Sarah? Yet my child, a son, I have born him in his old age.”
 
This laughter is joy, the text intends to convey the idea that a person who brings joy has entered the world, that all who hear of his birth will be filled with joy and respond in laughter. This joy has been introduced by the Merciful Judge of the universe so that all may join in celebrating the fulfilment of His promise. The laughter that accompanies this birth is a response of right action born of God’s mercy.
 
Rashi observes that this event brings hope and joy to the barren women of Israel, thus the joy shared by those who hear of Sarah’s miracle, forms a foundation for their trust in the God Who is able to bring life forth from a dead womb. This too is a picture of the then yet to be born Messiah and His resurrection.
 
The neighbours of Elisheva (Elizabeth), the mother of the prophet Yochanan (John) rejoiced in this same way when they heard that she had given birth (Luke 1:58). In that context it is called, “rejoicing” which is synonymous with the term, “laughter” in Genesis 21:6.
 
וַיִּגְדַּ֥ל הַיֶּ֖לֶד וַיִּגָּמַ֑ל וַיַּ֤עַשׂ אַבְרָהָם֙ מִשְׁתֶּ֣ה גָד֔וֹל בְּי֖וֹם הִגָּמֵ֥ל אֶת־יִצְחָֽק׃
 
Gen 21:8 And the child grew, and was weaned: and Avraham made a great feast the same day that Yitzchak was weaned.
 
The age of weaning cannot be determined with certainty. The rabbinical views range from three years to twelve years, citing various sources. Though some modern readers may find the idea of lengthy weaning periods to be distasteful (no pun intended), it was not unusual in ancient times for children to be nursed well into their formative years. When we add to this the fact that at the time of these events people were still living much longer than we do today, it seems reasonable to split the difference and settle on an approximate age of seven (Philo: De his Verb. Resipuit. Noe, p. 275) for Isaac’s weaning.
 
Rashi claims that the feast was great because the great men of that generation attended: Shem, Eber and Avimelech. Note the names: Shem (Name), Eber (Beyond) and Avimelech (My father is King). Each name describes God, The Name (Mercy), Messiah, God with us, Who enters the world from beyond, and My Father the King of worlds.
 
וַתֵּ֨רֶא שָׂרָ֜ה אֶֽת־בֶּן־הָגָ֧ר הַמִּצְרִ֛ית אֲשֶׁר־יָלְדָ֥ה לְאַבְרָהָ֖ם מְצַחֵֽק׃
 
Gen 21:9 And Sarah saw the son of Hagar (flight) the Mitzriyt (Egyptian: double distress), which she had born to Avraham, mocking m’tzacheik (laughing, mocking).
 
The Hebrew, מְצַחֵֽק m’tzacheik is a play on Isaac’s name, יִצְחָֽק Yitzchak. The text can be read, “And Sarah saw the son of Hagar the Egyptian, who she had born to Avraham, laughing in mockery, playing (at being Isaac).”
 
Thus, we could understand the text to mean that Ishmael was mocking by playing at being Isaac. This is yet another hint at the type of mockery that was taking place and illuminates the reason for Sarah’s firm resolve regarding Ishmael’s removal from the camp of Avraham. It seems that Ishmael was, at his mother Hagar’s prompting, seeking to usurp Isaac’s position as heir by demeaning and seeking to subjugate Isaac. This is of course confirmed by 21:10. This behaviour has continued to be the practice of Ishmael’s descendants toward Israel throughout recorded history
 
Ishmael is at this point in the historical record, a young man (17 – 27 yrs.) and is fully aware of his moral responsibility. From the text we can discern that Hagar’s influence and his own delusions of grandeur are responsible for his mocking of Isaac (21:10). Ishmael could have chosen to laugh in joy at the honouring of his new brother, however, he instead seeks to humiliate Isaac in the presence of those over whom Isaac is appointed to rule in his God established position as heir to the faith of Avraham. This is not the innocent mocking of a child rather it is the intentional sin of a young man, and a mocking not only of Isaac, Avraham and Sarah but more significantly a mocking of YHVH Who has established those being targeted as His representatives to bear light to the nations.
 
This same kind of mocking laughter (tz’cheik) is linked to the sins of idolatry (Exodus 32:6), adultery (Exodus 39:17) and murder (2 Samuel 2:14). Rashi notes that this infers the complete corruption of Ishmael and sees his being sent away as a necessary act for the sake of Isaac’s spiritual character and protection.
 
“Keep not Your silence, O Elohim: don’t hold Your peace, and don’t be still, O Elohim. For, behold, Your enemies make a tumult: and they that hate You have lifted up their heads in pride. They have taken crafty counsel against Your people (Israel), and consulted against the ones You protect. They have said, ‘Come, and let us cut them off from being a nation; that the name of Israel shall be remembered no more.’ For they have consulted together with one consent: they are confederate against You: The shelters of Edom, and the Ishmaelites; of Moab, and the Hagarenes…”
 
 –Tehillim (Psalm) 83:1-6
 
וַתֹּ֙אמֶר֙ לְאַבְרָהָ֔ם גָּרֵ֛שׁ הָאָמָ֥ה הַזֹּ֖את וְאֶת־בְּנָ֑הּ כִּ֣י לֹ֤א יִירַשׁ֙ בֶּן־הָאָמָ֣ה הַזֹּ֔את עִם־בְּנִ֖י עִם־יִצְחָֽק׃
 
Gen 21:10 So she said to Avraham, “Cast out this maid-servant and her son: for the son of this maid-servant shall not be heir with my son, even with Yitzchak (Isaac: he laughs).”
 
“Now we, fellow Jewish brothers and sisters in Messiah, are as Isaac was, the children of promise. But as it was then, he that was born after the flesh persecuted him that was born after the Spirit, even so it is now. Nevertheless, what does the scripture say? ‘Cast out the bondwoman and her son: for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son of the freewoman.’ So then, fellow Jewish brothers and sisters in Messiah, we are not children of the bondwoman, but of the free.”
 
–Galatians 4:28-31
 
As the primary matriarch of Israel, Sarah saw the danger that Ishmael posed to her son and his Godly mission. Sarah’s response is not one of vindictiveness but of protection. She speaks here, not out of hateful jealousy but in prophetic power, inspired by the Holy Spirit!
 
 וַיֵּ֧רַע הַדָּבָ֛ר מְאֹ֖ד בְּעֵינֵ֣י אַבְרָהָ֑ם עַ֖ל אוֹדֹ֥ת בְּנֽוֹ׃
 
Gen 21:11 And the thing was very grievous in Avraham's sight because of his son.
 
Avraham was grieved both by his son Ishmael’s behaviour and due to the resulting need for expelling him from the camp. To be clear, Avraham is grieved, not by Sarah’s request but by the need to expel his son Ishmael as a result of his own sin and the sin of Hagar and Ishmael.
 
Additionally Avraham is grieved because this sinful mockery has been aimed at his son and heir Isaac.
 
Pirke Eliezer calls this the most difficult of Avraham’s trials. (Pirke Eliezer, c 30 )
 
וַיֹּ֨אמֶר אֱלֹהִ֜ים אֶל־אַבְרָהָ֗ם אַל־יֵרַ֤ע בְּעֵינֶ֙יךָ֙ עַל־הַנַּ֣עַר וְעַל־אֲמָתֶ֔ךָ כֹּל֩ אֲשֶׁ֨ר תֹּאמַ֥ר אֵלֶ֛יךָ שָׂרָ֖ה שְׁמַ֣ע בְּקֹלָ֑הּ כִּ֣י בְיִצְחָ֔ק יִקָּרֵ֥א לְךָ֖ זָֽרַע׃
 
Gen 21:12 And God said to Avraham, “Let it not be grievous in your sight because of the boy, and because of your maid-servant; shema listen to, receive, comprehend, understand all that Sarah has said to you, hear her voice; for in (through) Yitzchak your seed will be called (identified).”
 
The Targum of Yonatan reads, “Listen to all that Sarah has said to you, hear her voice, for she is a prophetess.”
 
The Talmud Bavliy refers to Sarah’s protection of Isaac’s rights as evidence of the fact that she is a prophetess (b. Meg. 14a).
 
The Hebrew, שְׁמַע Shema, listen, hear, understand, comprehend; is used here in the present continuous or perfect tense of the Hebrew. It is the positive counter to the use of the same word in the past tense in Genesis 3:17, where Adam has listened (שָׁמַעְתָּ Shama’ta) to the flawed advice of Eve. By listening to Eve’s advice Adam invited sin into the world, whereas by listening to Sarah’s advice (via HaShem) Avraham invites light into the world. That is, Isaac was to be the heir who would produce the struggling people Yaakov/Israel. Israel in-turn was to be a light to the nations, a calling that is fully filled in the Mashiyach Yeshua, born to the line of Avraham, Yitzchak and Yaakov according to His humanity.
 
God affirms Sarah’s instruction, which is an act of righteous trust. With these words Sarah becomes Israel’s second prophet. God reminds Avraham that Isaac is the chosen seed who will perpetuate the ministry of light to the nations through his son Yaakov, Israel.
 
וְגַ֥ם אֶת־בֶּן־הָאָמָ֖ה לְג֣וֹי אֲשִׂימֶ֑נּוּ כִּ֥י זַרְעֲךָ֖ הֽוּא׃
 
Gen 21:13 And also of the son of the maid servant will I make a nation, because he is your seed.
 
By way of consolation God comforts Avraham with the knowledge that He will also take good care of Ishmael, making him a great, albeit subservient, nation.
 
וַיַּשְׁכֵּ֣ם אַבְרָהָ֣ם׀ בַּבֹּ֡קֶר וַיִּֽקַּֽח־לֶחֶם֩ וְחֵ֨מַת מַ֜יִם וַיִּתֵּ֣ן אֶל־הָ֠גָר שָׂ֧ם עַל־שִׁכְמָ֛הּ וְאֶת־הַיֶּ֖לֶד וַֽיְשַׁלְּחֶ֑הָ וַתֵּ֣לֶךְ וַתֵּ֔תַע בְּמִדְבַּ֖ר בְּאֵ֥ר שָֽׁבַע׃
 
Gen 21:14 And Avraham rose up early in the morning, and took bread, and a skin of water, and gave them to Hagar, putting them on her shoulder and with the young man, he sent her away: and she departed, and teitah (strayed, practiced error) in the wilderness of Beer-sheva (Well of seven, sevenfold covenant, well of blessing, covenant of rest).”
 
The act of waking early is a sign of immediate obedience on Avraham’s part. Regardless of his own grief at the loss of Ishmael, Avraham trusted God and acted in prompt obedience.
 
The Hebrew וַתֵּ֔תַע va’teitah indicates Hagar’s return to idolatrous practice as she sought a place of solace in the wilderness near Beer-sheva (a well which will be illuminated in the latter section of this account). Rashi suggests that Hagar returned to the idolatrous practices of her father’s house.
 
Ishmael is thought to be between 17 (Shalshalet Hakabala, fol. 2. 2) and 27 (Pirke Eliezer, c. 30. Bereshit Rabba, sect. 53. fol. 47. 4.) years of age at this point in the historical account.
 
Beer-sheva is approximately 19 kilometres from Gerar and 32 kilometres from Hebron to the south.
 
וַיִּכְל֥וּ הַמַּ֖יִם מִן־הַחֵ֑מֶת וַתַּשְׁלֵ֣ךְ אֶת־הַיֶּ֔לֶד תַּ֖חַת אַחַ֥ד הַשִּׂיחִֽם׃
וַתֵּלֶךְ֩ וַתֵּ֨שֶׁב לָ֜הּ מִנֶּ֗גֶד הַרְחֵק֙ כִּמְטַחֲוֵ֣י קֶ֔שֶׁת כִּ֣י אָֽמְרָ֔ה אַל־אֶרְאֶ֖ה בְּמ֣וֹת הַיָּ֑לֶד וַתֵּ֣שֶׁב מִנֶּ֔גֶד וַתִּשָּׂ֥א אֶת־קֹלָ֖הּ וַתֵּֽבְךְּ׃
 
Gen 21:15 And the water ran out, so she cast, (pushed, threw) the young man under one of the shrubs. Gen 21:16 And she went, and sat down at a distance from him, a bowshot (0.8km) away: for she said, “Let me not see the death of the young man.” And as she sat there she lifted up her voice, and wept.
 
Bereshit Rabba, records a bowshot distance at about half a mile (.8 Kilometre), saying that two bowshots make a mile (1.6 kilometres) [Bereshit Rabba, ut supra. sect. 53. fol. 47. 4].
 
The term, “Child” here could be misunderstood to mean, “infant”. However, a child remains the child of his mother regardless of his age, and this is what is intended here. In fact we know from both the chronology of historical Biblical events and from tradition that Ishmael is between 17 and 27 years of age at this point in time.
 
The great irony of Hagar’s lack of water, is that her blindness to the presence of water has come about through her own spiritual decay. Both her expulsion from the camp of Avraham and her subsequent suffering are directly related to her continued attempts to seek Isaac’s inheritance for her own son Ishmael.
 
Rabbi Hirsch wisely observes that, “Hagar’s behaviour is disgraceful… Rather than comfort her child in his dying moments, she thought only of herself and the discomfort she would feel in the presence of his agony.” This is why the following verse begins with the words, “God heard the voice of the young man;”
 
וַיִּשְׁמַ֣ע אֱלֹהִים֮ אֶת־ק֣וֹל הַנַּעַר֒ וַיִּקְרָא֩ מַלְאַ֨ךְ אֱלֹהִ֤ים׀ אֶל־הָגָר֙ מִן־הַשָּׁמַ֔יִם וַיֹּ֥אמֶר לָ֖הּ מַה־לָּ֣ךְ הָגָ֑ר אַל־תִּ֣ירְאִ֔י כִּֽי־שָׁמַ֧ע אֱלֹהִ֛ים אֶל־ק֥וֹל הַנַּ֖עַר בַּאֲשֶׁ֥ר הוּא־שָֽׁם׃
 
Gen 21:17 And God heard the voice of the young man; and the angel of Elohim (God, Judge) called to Hagar out of the heavens, and said to her, “What ails you, Hagar? Fear not; for Elohim (God, Judge) has heard the voice of the young man where he is.”
 
God’s communication with Hagar differs greatly from the way He has met with Avraham. We note that the angel of Elohim (God), rather than the angel of YHVH, calls to her from the heavens instead of meeting her in humanoid form on earth as He had done with Avraham. It is Elohim, the Judge and Ruler, Who attends to Hagar’s son. Mercy (YHVH) is with Avraham (Isaac and Yaakov) but Judgement (Elohim) has come to Ishmael and his decedents.
 
ק֚וּמִי שְׂאִ֣י אֶת־הַנַּ֔עַר וְהַחֲזִ֥יקִי אֶת־יָדֵ֖ךְ בּ֑וֹ כִּֽי־לְג֥וֹי גָּד֖וֹל אֲשִׂימֶֽנּוּ׃
וַיִּפְקַ֤ח אֱלֹהִים֙ אֶת־עֵינֶ֔יהָ וַתֵּ֖רֶא בְּאֵ֣ר מָ֑יִם וַתֵּ֜לֶךְ וַתְּמַלֵּ֤א אֶת־הַחֵ֙מֶת֙ מַ֔יִם וַתַּ֖שְׁקְ אֶת־הַנָּֽעַר׃
 
Gen 21:18 Arise, lift up the young man, and hold him in your hand; for I will make him a great nation. Gen 21:19 And Elohim (God, Judge) opened her eyes, and she saw a well of water; and she went, and filled the water-skin with water, and gave the young man a drink.
 
Some suggest that this well was made to appear supernaturally, however, the context suggests that the well finds its symbolic form in the origin story of verses 23-33, where Avraham presents ewe lambs as an offering that testifies to his right to its water through the cutting of a covenant before the Judge, Elohim. Due to the fact that the agreement for, and the naming of the well (v.23-33) is considered to have preceded the events of verses 1 through 21, it is safe to conclude that the limited supplies given to Hagar by Avraham were intended to last her the short distance to Beer-sheva, a well that Avraham had already redeemed for the use of his household.
 
The sages say that this well has ancient origins and was in fact, “Created between the two evenings, that is, on the eve of the seventh day of the creation.” (Pirke Eliezer, ut supra. c. 30)
 
It is by the Word of Hashem that Hagar’s eyes are opened and she receives living water. Hagar had returned to idolatry (v.14) and was therefore, not only physically but also spiritually blind to the water that was right in front of her.
 
Yeshua said, “Whoever drinks the water I give will never thirst again.”
 
This well is Beer-sheva, the well of sevenfold blessing, rest and covenant promise. By trusting in God’s Word (John 1), Hagar receives life for both herself and her son.
 
The Shomroniy (Samaritan) woman of John 4 is likewise held accountable by God in Messiah at Jacob’s well, and as a result repents, receives the living water of Yeshua, and proceeds to invite Yeshua, Salvation Himself to her village.
 
וַיְהִ֧י אֱלֹהִ֛ים אֶת־הַנַּ֖עַר וַיִּגְדָּ֑ל וַיֵּ֙שֶׁב֙ בַּמִּדְבָּ֔ר וַיְהִ֖י רֹבֶ֥ה קַשָּֽׁת׃
 
Gen 21:20 And Elohim (God, Judge) was with the young man; and he grew, and dwelt in the wilderness, and became an archer.
 
Hagar had sat a bow shot away from her son. Now her son becomes an archer. Both Ishmael’s role and the role of his descendants are emphasised by the symbol of the bow (warfare).
 
“And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brothers.”
 
–Bereishit (Genesis) 16:12
 
Jewish tradition says that Ishmael, “Was born with a bow, and brought up with one, and that he shot an arrow at his brother Isaac, with the intention to kill him, while he was in Avraham's house;” (Pirke, c. 30 Ammian. Marcellin. Hist. l. 14)
 
 וַיֵּ֖שֶׁב בְּמִדְבַּ֣ר פָּארָ֑ן וַתִּֽקַּֽח־ל֥וֹ אִמּ֛וֹ אִשָּׁ֖ה מֵאֶ֥רֶץ מִצְרָֽיִם׃
 
Gen 21:21 And he dwelt in the wilderness of Paran (Beautiful caverns): and his mother took him a wife out of the land of Egypt (Mitzrayim: double distress).
 
The location of the ancient wilderness of Paran is debated and manipulated by Islamic scholars, however, it seems most likely that the location of Paran is below the Sea of Salt (Dead sea) to the south-west near the border of Modern Israel and Jordan. There are a number of factors that support this location, including the name itself relative to the geography of the region.
 
One Jewish tradition suggests that Ishmael had two wives; the first he divorced, and then he married the Egyptian; his first wife, they say, he sent for, and took out of the plains of Moab, whose name was “Adishah,” and the other “Phatimah.” (Pirke Eliezer, ut supra. c. 30)
 
“And he (Ishmael) dwelt in the wilderness of Paran, and took to wife Adishah, whom he divorced, and then his mother took him Phatimah to wife, out of the land of Egypt:''
 
–Yerushalayim & Yonatan Targums 2nd Century C.E
 
 וַֽיְהִי֙ בָּעֵ֣ת הַהִ֔וא וַיֹּ֣אמֶר אֲבִימֶ֗לֶךְ וּפִיכֹל֙ שַׂר־צְבָא֔וֹ אֶל־אַבְרָהָ֖ם לֵאמֹ֑ר אֱלֹהִ֣ים עִמְּךָ֔ בְּכֹ֥ל אֲשֶׁר־אַתָּ֖ה עֹשֶֽׂה׃
וְעַתָּ֗ה הִשָּׁ֨בְעָה לִּ֤י בֵֽאלֹהִים֙ הֵ֔נָּה אִם־תִּשְׁקֹ֣ר לִ֔י וּלְנִינִ֖י וּלְנֶכְדִּ֑י כַּחֶ֜סֶד אֲשֶׁר־עָשִׂ֤יתִי עִמְּךָ֙ תַּעֲשֶׂ֣ה עִמָּדִ֔י וְעִם־הָאָ֖רֶץ אֲשֶׁר־גַּ֥רְתָּה בָּֽהּ׃
וַיֹּ֙אמֶר֙ אַבְרָהָ֔ם אָנֹכִ֖י אִשָּׁבֵֽעַ׃
 
Gen 21:22 And it came to pass at that time, that Avimelech (My father is king) and Phichol (Peh-col: Mouth of all, strength) the chief captain of his army, spoke to Avraham, saying, “Elohim (God, Judge) is with you in all that you do:” Gen 21:23 “Now therefore, swear to me here by Elohim (God, Judge) that you will not deal falsely with me, nor with my son, nor with my son's son: but according to the kindness that I have done to you, you shall do to me, and to the land where you have sojourned.” Gen 21:24 And Avraham said, “I will swear.”
 
These events can be understood to have been set in the past and read as, “And it was in the past at that time…” This seems consistent with the previous identification of the wilderness of Beer-sheva in the account of Hagar’s expulsion. The establishing of the well of Beer-sheva prior to Hagar’s wandering shows that the blessing of God comes to her via Avraham’s trust.
 
It’s worth noting that Avimelech does not seek a covenant with Avraham because of his wealth but with the words, “God is with you in all that you do.”
 
It seems that the Philistines observed this oath until the days of the judge Samson, when they began to attack Israel for the first time. (Sotah 10a)
 
וְהוֹכִ֥חַ אַבְרָהָ֖ם אֶת־אֲבִימֶ֑לֶךְ עַל־אֹדוֹת֙ בְּאֵ֣ר הַמַּ֔יִם אֲשֶׁ֥ר גָּזְל֖וּ עַבְדֵ֥י אֲבִימֶֽלֶךְ׃
 
Gen 21:25 And Avraham rebuked Avimelech because of a well of water, which Avimelech's servants had violently taken away.
 
If there was to be a covenant Avraham wanted it to be established with truth and integrity. This is why he placed his cards on the table regarding the continued violent behaviour of Avimelech’s men. With peace comes responsibility and openness. Any peace devised outside of these parameters is a false peace. Many today in both secular and religious communities hide behind nondisclosure agreements and legalese in order to avoid accountability. As a result of this wilful lack of transparency numerous injustices are committed and in turn form a shaky foundation that makes any real lasting peace between people impossible to achieve.
 
וַיֹּ֣אמֶר אֲבִימֶ֔לֶךְ לֹ֣א יָדַ֔עְתִּי מִ֥י עָשָׂ֖ה אֶת־הַדָּבָ֣ר הַזֶּ֑ה וְגַם־אַתָּ֞ה לֹא־הִגַּ֣דְתָּ לִּ֗י וְגַ֧ם אָנֹכִ֛י לֹ֥א שָׁמַ֖עְתִּי בִּלְתִּ֥י הַיּֽוֹם׃
 
Gen 21:26 And Avimelech said, “I don’t know who has done this thing: neither did you tell me, nor have I heard of it, until today.”
 
Avimelech’s claim seems unlikely, given that it had been his practice to send his men to commit crimes against others (the abduction of Sarah).
 
וַיִּקַּ֤ח אַבְרָהָם֙ צֹ֣אן וּבָקָ֔ר וַיִּתֵּ֖ן לַאֲבִימֶ֑לֶךְ וַיִּכְרְת֥וּ שְׁנֵיהֶ֖ם בְּרִֽית׃
וַיַּצֵּ֣ב אַבְרָהָ֗ם אֶת־שֶׁ֛בַע כִּבְשֹׂ֥ת הַצֹּ֖אן לְבַדְּהֶֽן׃
וַיֹּ֥אמֶר אֲבִימֶ֖לֶךְ אֶל־אַבְרָהָ֑ם מָ֣ה הֵ֗נָּה שֶׁ֤בַע כְּבָשֹׂת֙ הָאֵ֔לֶּה אֲשֶׁ֥ר הִצַּ֖בְתָּ לְבַדָּֽנָה׃
וַיֹּ֕אמֶר כִּ֚י אֶת־שֶׁ֣בַע כְּבָשֹׂ֔ת תִּקַּ֖ח מִיָּדִ֑י בַּעֲבוּר֙ תִּֽהְיֶה־לִּ֣י לְעֵדָ֔ה כִּ֥י חָפַ֖רְתִּי אֶת־הַבְּאֵ֥ר הַזֹּֽאת׃
עַל־כֵּ֗ן קָרָ֛א לַמָּק֥וֹם הַה֖וּא בְּאֵ֣ר שָׁ֑בַע כִּ֛י שָׁ֥ם נִשְׁבְּע֖וּ שְׁנֵיהֶֽם׃
 וַיִּכְרְת֥וּ בְרִ֖ית בִּבְאֵ֣ר שָׁ֑בַע וַיָּ֣קָם אֲבִימֶ֗לֶךְ וּפִיכֹל֙ שַׂר־צְבָא֔וֹ וַיָּשֻׁ֖בוּ אֶל־אֶ֥רֶץ פְּלִשְׁתִּֽים׃
 
Gen 21:27 And Avraham took sheep and oxen, and gave them unto Avimelech; and both of them cut a covenant. Gen 21:28 And Avraham set seven ewe lambs of the flock by themselves. Gen 21:29 And Avimelech asked Avraham, “What is the meaning of these seven ewe lambs which you have set by themselves?” Gen 21:30 And he said, “These seven ewe (female) lambs shall you take from my hand, that they may bear witness of me, that I discovered this well.” Gen 21:31 So he called that place Beer-sheva (Well of seven, sevenfold covenant, well of blessing, covenant of rest); because there they both swore. Gen 21:32 Thus, they cut a covenant at Beer-sheva: then Avimelech rose up, and Phichol (Peh-col: Mouth of all, strength) the chief captain of his army, and they returned into the land of the Pilishtiym (Immigrants, invaders, usurpers).
 
The seven (שֶׁ֛בַע shevah) female lambs correspond to the oath (נִשְׁבְּע֖וּ nishbeu) and emphasize the completeness, longevity and rest that the oath will bring. Allegorically speaking, based solely on the meaning of the names, the father of trust is making an agreement with his father the King. Thus the well is named quite literally, “Well of Seven” or, “Well of Oath”.
 
Avraham’s insistence that Avimelech accept the lambs as a gift is an ancient means of verifying ownership, much like the transaction carried out in Ruth 4:7. It is a symbolic act, intended to be witnessed by all present as a mark of future legal ownership and the security that it affords future generations.
 
 וַיִּטַּ֥ע אֶ֖שֶׁל בִּבְאֵ֣ר שָׁ֑בַע וַיִּ֨קְרָא־שָׁ֔ם בְּשֵׁ֥ם יְהוָ֖ה אֵ֥ל עוֹלָֽם׃
וַיָּ֧גָר אַבְרָהָ֛ם בְּאֶ֥רֶץ פְּלִשְׁתִּ֖ים יָמִ֥ים רַבִּֽים׃
 
Gen 21:33 And Avraham planted an orchard (tamarisk) in Beersheva, and called there on the name of HaShem (YHVH: Mercy), the everlasting Elohim (God, Judge). Gen 21:34 And Avraham sojourned in the land of Pilishtiym (Immigrants, invaders, usurpers) many days.
 
The account ends with the planting of an orchard representing shade and respite for weary desert travellers and the unity of the God-head in Mercy (YHVH) and Judgement (Elohim).
 
The planting of trees, possibly tamarisk (an evergreen tree that is common to the Middle East, and can reach heights of 15.2 meters) is an act of remembrance. In fact trees are still planted today in Israel in memory of loved ones and to mark special events. Therefore, the planting of these shady trees near a well in an arid location are best understood to represent a memorial to the God Who has provided Avraham with an heir, life-giving water and shelter in the wilderness.
 
Avraham is said to have sojourned in the land of the Philistines for twenty-six years. (Yarchi & Bereshit Rabbah, sect. 54. fol. 48. 4)
 
Rashi says that it’s important to read this as a sojourning because the years from the birth of Isaac are to be counted in the 400 years during which Avraham’s descendants would be aliens in a land not their own. However, the land in which Avraham is now sojourning has already been promised to him and his descendants, therefore, Rashi’s assertion is incompatible with the prophetic Word of God. The four hundred years can only refer to the years Israel will spend in Egypt as slaves to Pharaoh.
 
© 2024 Yaakov Ben Yehoshua

Introduction:
 
After witnessing the destruction of S’dom, Avraham moves south. All of the land both to the north and to the south had already been promised to Avraham by God (Gen 13:14-15).
 
Some have suggested that chapter 20 is a duplicate of the account of chapter 12, however, the reasoning for this is weak. They say that a man would not make the same mistake twice and therefore this must be a repetition. Additionally they suggest that the writer was an Elohimist (So called E author), of course they have no valid argument for explaining the use of the holy name YHVH in the final verse, other than to propose that this was included as part of a Yahwehist (So called J author) account redacted at a later date.
 
The suggestion that a man would not make the same mistake twice is ludicrous and the subsequent multiple author claim is equally untenable. Add to this that Avraham explains clearly in verse 13 that this has been his practice since leaving Ur (light), and we are left with only one plausible conclusion, that this is a unique and separate account from that of chapter 12.
 
וַיִּסַּ֨ע מִשָּׁ֤ם אַבְרָהָם֙ אַ֣רְצָה הַנֶּ֔גֶב וַיֵּ֥שֶׁב בֵּין־קָדֵ֖שׁ וּבֵ֣ין שׁ֑וּר וַיָּ֖גָר בִּגְרָֽר׃
 
Gen 20:1 And Avraham (Father of many nations) journeyed from there (Mamrei: strength) toward the south country, and dwelt between Kadesh (Holy) and Shur (a wall), and sojourned in Gerar (drag off roughly).
 
These events must occur soon after the destruction of S’dom because Sarah is clearly still not showing her pregnancy, based on the fact that Avimelech sees her as a potential wife. The place Avraham journeyed from was Mamrei (strength), and he was journeying south, just as he had when he had approached Egypt in chapter 12.
 
The meanings of the Hebrew names of the towns he settled between place Avraham (The father of trust) at a crossroads between Holiness (Kadesh) and a wall (Shur: possible blockade). Alternatively he finds himself resting with Holiness (Kadesh) on one side and Protection (Shur: wall) on the other.
 
The region of Gerar (drag off roughly) is to be understood both literally and as a literary clue to what is about to take place. It is this allusion to a land where people are, “roughly dragged off” that sets the stage for the remainder of the account.
 
וַיֹּ֧אמֶר אַבְרָהָ֛ם אֶל־שָׂרָ֥ה אִשְׁתּ֖וֹ אֲחֹ֣תִי הִ֑וא וַיִּשְׁלַ֗ח אֲבִימֶ֙לֶךְ֙ מֶ֣לֶךְ גְּרָ֔ר וַיִּקַּ֖ח אֶת־שָׂרָֽה׃
 
Gen 20:2 And Avraham said of Sarah (Princess) his wife, “She is my sister”: and Avimelech (my father is king) king of Gerar (drag off roughly) sent men and seized Sarah.
 
The remez (hint) in the preceding verse, seen in the name Gerar (drag off roughly) is immediately enacted by Avimelech. As soon as he discovers that Sarah might be an unmarried woman, he sends men to abduct her. Note that he, “sent” others to take her and that they, “seized” her. The protocol of the time required for permission to be asked of her ruling male relative (Avraham), similar customs developed and were practiced by Jews in the first century CE, where a betrothal agreement was to be entered into and a one year period of preparation for the wedding was to be observed. Regardless of the finer details, what is clear is that this was an abduction and not an agreed arrangement. Today we might term this an attempt at sex trafficking. This of course illuminates just how righteous Avimelech really was. That is, nothing more than righteous in his own eyes.
 
D'varim (Deuteronomy) 24:7 which would be given to Israel at Sinai as law, states clearly that kidnapping of a fellow Israelite is punishable by death, how much more so the kidnapping of a relative of the father of faith himself. Regardless of whether Sarah is perceived as Avraham’s sister or not, kidnapping her was considered a capital offence in the ancient levant.
 
For Avraham’s part, the half-truth that Sarah was his sister was intended from the beginning (v.13) to be a means of protecting their retinue. Part of the reasoning for this is that protocol requires a proposal and a betrothal price to be paid to the ruling male member of the bride’s family. Thus Avraham must have presumed that he would have an opportunity to refuse such a proposal on Sarah’s behalf. It is still the practice of many Jewish and Arabic peoples today, for the agreement of the eldest male to not only be sought but also confirmed prior to any betrothal taking place. This same practice finds its way into the respectful western practice of asking the permission of the father prior to offering an engagement ring to a prospective bride.

Some deny an attraction component to the abduction of Sarah by Avimelekh. Citing her age as proof she was no longer sexually desirable.
 
However, retrospectively applying modern norms to ancient Scripture will nine times out of ten conclude error.
 
Sarah was approximately 90 when Avimelekh kidnapped her (cf. Genesis 17:1,17; 21:1-5).
 
Sarah was 127 when she died (Gen. 23:1). Therefore, given current aging and lifespans, Sarah was the equivalent of a modern 40 to 50 year old woman when she was kidnapped by Avimelekh.
 
There are numerous examples of attractive 50 year old women today.
 
Sarah was a beautiful woman (Gen. 12:11), who aged well and continued to be attractive in her later years. 
 
The text of Genesis 20:16 explains that Avimelekh paid silver to compensate for perceived sexual shame. Therefore, those who watched all this happen, Abraham, Avimelekh, and his men all clearly understood Sarah's abduction to have a sexual component.
 
It’s nonetheless also a possibility that Avimelekh intended Sarah’s abduction as either a means to usurp Avraham’s authority in order to acquire greater power through Avraham’s amassed wealth and reputation, or for use as a hostage bargaining chip intended to extort wealth from Avraham in return for Sarah’s release.
 
וַיָּבֹ֧א אֱלֹהִ֛ים אֶל־אֲבִימֶ֖לֶךְ בַּחֲל֣וֹם הַלָּ֑יְלָה וַיֹּ֣אמֶר ל֗וֹ הִנְּךָ֥ מֵת֙ עַל־הָאִשָּׁ֣ה אֲשֶׁר־לָקַ֔חְתָּ וְהִ֖וא בְּעֻ֥לַת בָּֽעַל׃
 
Gen 20:3 But Elohim (God, Judge) came to Avimelech in a dream by night, and said to him, “Behold, you are to die, for the woman you have abducted; she is the wife of a husband (Ba’al: master).
 
Notice that the words of God spoken to Avimelech reflect the instruction of God concerning kidnapping which was in turn a commonly held moral measure in the ancient levant.
 
God appears to Avimelech as Judge. He makes plan His judgement, “You are to die, for the woman you have abducted…” There are two crimes here: first, the crime of kidnapping and second, the soon to be enacted crime of rape. Make no mistake, even by the standards of the time the kidnapping of an unmarried woman was cause for tribal war. Avimelech is guilty, God does not bring judgement against the innocent.
 
וַאֲבִימֶ֕לֶךְ לֹ֥א קָרַ֖ב אֵלֶ֑יהָ וַיֹּאמַ֕ר אֲדֹנָ֕י הֲג֥וֹי גַּם־צַדִּ֖יק תַּהֲרֹֽג׃
 
Gen 20:4 But Avimelech had not come near her: and he said, “Adonai (lord), the nation (goy: heathen nation) that is also just, will You destroy?”
 
“Had not come near her” is a euphemism for sexual intimacy. The fact that Avimelech had not yet used Sarah for his own sexual pleasure (remember that he already has at least one other wife v.17) does not mean that he didn’t intend to.
 
Avimelech is obviously aware of the recent destruction of S’dom and Amorah and thus by comparing his own region’s relative morality with that of S’dom’s abominations, defends himself and his kingdom as a just nation relatively speaking (neither he nor his people qualify as just based on the kidnapping). He is clearly afraid that the same destruction that has come upon those cities will also be meted out upon his own kingdom because of God’s relationship to Avraham. Avimelech calling YHVH “Adonai” (lord) does not mean he is a devotee to YHVH but that he recognizes the power of YHVH and is fearful of Him just as he would be of any spiritual force that might bring harm upon him. Avimelech is superstitious, not honourable. We must read Avimelech’s response as his own determination of his moral standing and that of his nation. It is not the verdict of God, the Judge.
 
הֲלֹ֨א ה֤וּא אָֽמַר־לִי֙ אֲחֹ֣תִי הִ֔וא וְהִֽיא־גַם־הִ֥וא אָֽמְרָ֖ה אָחִ֣י ה֑וּא בְּתָם־לְבָבִ֛י וּבְנִקְיֹ֥ן כַּפַּ֖י עָשִׂ֥יתִי זֹֽאת׃
 
Gen 20:5 “Didn’t he say to me, ‘She is my sister’? And she, even she herself said, ‘He is my brother’: due to the integrity of my levaviy (my inner man, heart) innocent are my palms of having done this.”
 
Avimelech is not yet guilty of the rape/adultery, however, he is guilty of kidnapping. His delusional protests regarding his heart condition are exposed by the following statement of God.
 
וַיֹּאמֶר֩ אֵלָ֨יו הָֽאֱלֹהִ֜ים בַּחֲלֹ֗ם גַּ֣ם אָנֹכִ֤י יָדַ֙עְתִּי֙ כִּ֤י בְתָם־לְבָבְךָ֙ עָשִׂ֣יתָ זֹּ֔את וָאֶחְשֹׂ֧ךְ גַּם־אָנֹכִ֛י אֽוֹתְךָ֖ מֵחֲטוֹ־לִ֑י עַל־כֵּ֥ן לֹא־נְתַתִּ֖יךָ לִנְגֹּ֥עַ אֵלֶֽיהָ׃
 
Gen 20:6 And Ha-Elohim (the God, the Judge) said to him in a dream, “Yes, I also know that you did this with an innocent leiv (inner man, heart); for I also kept you from sinning against Me: therefore I did not allow you to touch her.”
 
“You did this (kidnapped with the intention of rapping), with an innocent heart…” Listen to the palpable irony here, this is not YHVH saying that Avimelech is innocent but that he is innocent of the later crime of rape simply because he hasn’t had the opportunity yet to enact his desire.
 
The so called integrity or innocence of Avimelech’s heart is shown for what it actually is, God prevented him from sexually violating Sarah. Thus Avimelech’s integrity is intact only because God stopped him from violating her.
 
I read, “Yes, I know all about your innocent heart, I’m the one who kept it innocent, I stopped you from sinning further”. In other words, you have no integrity of your own.
 
Note also that God says, “I also kept you from sinning against me.”Avimelech was about to defile the matriarch of the chosen people Israel. The people Who God had purposed to give birth to the Messiah, the One Who would deliver both Israel and the nations. This is not simply a sin against Avraham but an attempt to disturb the holy lineage of Israel and her Messiah.
 
If Avimelech was aware of the recent destruction of S’dom and Amorrah and the link to Avraham, then all his actions show contempt for Avraham and his God.
 
וְעַתָּ֗ה הָשֵׁ֤ב אֵֽשֶׁת־הָאִישׁ֙ כִּֽי־נָבִ֣יא ה֔וּא וְיִתְפַּלֵּ֥ל בַּֽעַדְךָ֖ וֶֽחְיֵ֑ה וְאִם־אֵֽינְךָ֣ מֵשִׁ֗יב דַּ֚ע כִּי־מ֣וֹת תָּמ֔וּת אַתָּ֖ה וְכָל־אֲשֶׁר־לָֽךְ׃
 
Gen 20:7 “Now therefore return the wife of the man; for he is a prophet, and he will intercede on your behalf, and you will live: and if you don’t return her, know that you will surely die, you, and all that are yours.”
 
The text infers that Avimelech was already afflicted to some degree and that if he sinned further he and his household would die. God does not punish the innocent, therefore, we must conclude once again that Avimelech is considered to be guilty and is being shown mercy so as not to invite death through an additional act of sin.
 
God calls Avraham a prophet, in fact Avraham is the first to be called a prophet of God. God has already credited Avraham’s trust as righteousness and considers him a type for the coming Messiah: an intercessor and redeemer of others, a light to the nations.
 
וַיַּשְׁכֵּ֨ם אֲבִימֶ֜לֶךְ בַּבֹּ֗קֶר וַיִּקְרָא֙ לְכָל־עֲבָדָ֔יו וַיְדַבֵּ֛ר אֶת־כָּל־הַדְּבָרִ֥ים הָאֵ֖לֶּה בְּאָזְנֵיהֶ֑ם וַיִּֽירְא֥וּ הָאֲנָשִׁ֖ים מְאֹֽד׃
 
Gen 20:8 Therefore Avimelech rose early in the morning, and called all his servants, and told all these things in their ears: and the men were very afraid.
 
The men were afraid because they knew what had happened to their neighbours in the east. They were right to be afraid. They were complicit in the kidnapping of Sarah. Those who sin against God’s chosen are sinning against God Himself.
 
וַיִּקְרָ֨א אֲבִימֶ֜לֶךְ לְאַבְרָהָ֗ם וַיֹּ֨אמֶר ל֜וֹ מֶֽה־עָשִׂ֤יתָ לָּ֙נוּ֙ וּמֶֽה־חָטָ֣אתִי לָ֔ךְ כִּֽי־הֵבֵ֧אתָ עָלַ֛י וְעַל־מַמְלַכְתִּ֖י חֲטָאָ֣ה גְדֹלָ֑ה מַעֲשִׂים֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר לֹא־יֵֽעָשׂ֔וּ עָשִׂ֖יתָ עִמָּדִֽי׃
 
Gen 20:9 Then Avimelech called Avraham, and said unto him, “What have you done to us? And how have I offended you that you have brought on me and on my kingdom a great sin? You have done deeds to me that ought not to be done.”
 
These words of Avimelech are the height of hypocrisy. After all, he has abducted a woman against her will without consideration for the stigma attached to the perceived defilement of an unwed woman (Avraham and Sarah’s ruse notwithstanding), and it’s he who has disregarded Avraham’s rights as a sojourner and visitor among the people of Gerar. His unrepentant heart is proof that any innocence he might have stumbled across was clearly not of his own making.
 
 וַיֹּ֥אמֶר אֲבִימֶ֖לֶךְ אֶל־אַבְרָהָ֑ם מָ֣ה רָאִ֔יתָ כִּ֥י עָשִׂ֖יתָ אֶת־הַדָּבָ֥ר הַזֶּֽה׃
 
Gen 20:10 And Avimelech said unto Avraham, “What did you see, that caused you to do this thing?”
 
Avimelech hints at what he knows Avraham may have witnessed among the people of Gerar. This appears to be a rhetorical question but it is one that Avraham is able to answer (v.11)
 
וַיֹּ֙אמֶר֙ אַבְרָהָ֔ם כִּ֣י אָמַ֗רְתִּי רַ֚ק אֵין־יִרְאַ֣ת אֱלֹהִ֔ים בַּמָּק֖וֹם הַזֶּ֑ה וַהֲרָג֖וּנִי עַל־דְּבַ֥ר אִשְׁתִּֽי׃
 
Gen 20:11 And Avraham said, “Because I thought, surely the fear of Elohim (God, the Judge) is not in this place; and they will slay me because of my wife.”
 
Avraham saw the way the people of Gerar treated each other and those who sojourned among them, thus he concluded that they had no fear of God. Avimelech’s actions in sending men to abduct Sarah only proved to affirm this fact. Avraham asserts a convincing argument for the defence of his actions regarding Sarah.
​
וְגַם־אָמְנָ֗ה אֲחֹתִ֤י בַת־אָבִי֙ הִ֔וא אַ֖ךְ לֹ֣א בַת־אִמִּ֑י וַתְּהִי־לִ֖י לְאִשָּֽׁה׃
 
Gen 20:12 “Additionally, she is indeed my sister; she is the daughter of my father, but not the daughter of my mother; and she became my wife.”
 
Avraham is at best guilty of deceptive speech for the purpose of self-defence. The lesser commandment submits to the greater.
 
וַיְהִ֞י כַּאֲשֶׁ֧ר הִתְע֣וּ אֹתִ֗י אֱלֹהִים֮ מִבֵּ֣ית אָבִי֒ וָאֹמַ֣ר לָ֔הּ זֶ֣ה חַסְדֵּ֔ךְ אֲשֶׁ֥ר תַּעֲשִׂ֖י עִמָּדִ֑י אֶ֤ל כָּל־הַמָּקוֹם֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר נָב֣וֹא שָׁ֔מָּה אִמְרִי־לִ֖י אָחִ֥י הֽוּא׃
 
Gen 20:13  “And it came to pass, when Elohim (God) caused me to wander from my father's house, I said to her, ‘This is the chesed (kindness) which you can accomplish for me; at every place we will come to, say of me, ‘He is my brother.’”
 
This verse makes clear the fact that this scenario was a well-practised one. We read in the Torah of two specific instances, but there may have been others. The point is, that this is not a duplicate of the events of chapter 12.

 וַיִּקַּ֨ח אֲבִימֶ֜לֶךְ צֹ֣אן וּבָקָ֗ר וַעֲבָדִים֙ וּשְׁפָחֹ֔ת וַיִּתֵּ֖ן לְאַבְרָהָ֑ם וַיָּ֣שֶׁב ל֔וֹ אֵ֖ת שָׂרָ֥ה אִשְׁתּֽוֹ׃
 
Gen 20:14 And Avimelech took sheep, and oxen, and menservants, and women-servants, and gave them to Avraham, and returned to him his wife Sarah.
 
These are the actions of a guilty and fearful man. This is restitution for the abduction but it is not sufficient payment to clear the good name of Sarah and cover the bride price.
 
As in the case of the events of chapter 12, Avraham has travelled from Mamrei (strength) and having suffered the trial of having his wife abducted, is now being prospered with the addition of flocks and herds. Thus he has gone from strength to strength in HaShem’s continued purpose for his life and that of his descendants.
 
 וַיֹּ֣אמֶר אֲבִימֶ֔לֶךְ הִנֵּ֥ה אַרְצִ֖י לְפָנֶ֑יךָ בַּטּ֥וֹב בְּעֵינֶ֖יךָ שֵֽׁב׃
 
Gen 20:15 And Avimelech said, “Behold, my land is before you: dwell wherever you please.”
 
In fact the land does not belong to Avimelech but has already been promised to Avraham and the children of Israel. Thus Avraham sojourns in yet another part of the fullness of the land that is to be given to his progeny by God.
 
וּלְשָׂרָ֣ה אָמַ֗ר הִנֵּ֨ה נָתַ֜תִּי אֶ֤לֶף כֶּ֙סֶף֙ לְאָחִ֔יךְ הִנֵּ֤ה הוּא־לָךְ֙ כְּס֣וּת עֵינַ֔יִם לְכֹ֖ל אֲשֶׁ֣ר אִתָּ֑ךְ וְאֵ֥ת כֹּ֖ל וְנֹכָֽחַת׃
 
Gen 20:16 And to Sarah he said, “Behold, I have given your brother a thousand pieces of silver: behold, it is to you a covering of the eyes, to all that are with you, and with all others:” thus she was vindicated.
 
Avimelech remains defiant to some degree, using Avraham and Sarah’s words against them, “I have given your brother…”
 
The silver is a bride price that seeks to declare Sarah’s purity and provide for the veiled symbol of that purity. This is why the covering is said to show both her and those around her that she has remained sexually pure.
 
An alternate reading is, “Behold, he is to you a covering of the eyes” meaning that Avraham’s status as a prophet of God protects Sarah.
 
Some read the latter clause as a rebuke. If that is correct, Avimelech intends insult by proposing the veil and may be inferring prostitution (Genesis 38:15). If this is the correct reading then Avimelech proves the depths of his unrepentant heart and the vile impetus of his inner man.

וַיִּתְפַּלֵּ֥ל אַבְרָהָ֖ם אֶל־הָאֱלֹהִ֑ים וַיִּרְפָּ֨א אֱלֹהִ֜ים אֶת־אֲבִימֶ֧לֶךְ וְאֶת־אִשְׁתּ֛וֹ וְאַמְהֹתָ֖יו וַיֵּלֵֽדוּ׃
 כִּֽי־עָצֹ֤ר עָצַר֙ יְהוָ֔ה בְּעַ֥ד כָּל־רֶ֖חֶם לְבֵ֣ית אֲבִימֶ֑לֶךְ עַל־דְּבַ֥ר שָׂרָ֖ה אֵ֥שֶׁת אַבְרָהָֽם׃
 
Gen 20:17 So Avraham interceded with Ha-Elohim (God): and Elohim (God) healed Avimelech, and his wife, and his maidservants; and they bore children. Gen 20:18 For HaShem (YHVH: Mercy) had sealed shut all the wombs of the house of Avimelech, on the word of Sarah, wife of Avraham.
 
These last verses show us that Avimelech and his household were already being punished for the sin of abducting Sarah, and this because of Sarah’s cry to God (on the word of Sarah). This is a chilling reminder of the plagues that HaShem sent against Pharoah and his house because of Sarah (12:17). What is clear is that God is the protector of both Avraham and Sarah and that He remains the protector of His servants, both men and women, to this day.
 
Avraham’s willingness to advocate for Avimelech and his family in spite of the seeming continued lack of repentance on Avimelech’s part, is evidence yet again of Avraham’s faith in YHVH and his ability in God to reflect the gracious and merciful love of the Creator as a figure for the King Messiah Yeshua HaMelekh. “Mercy triumphs over judgement!”
 
© 2024 Yaakov Ben Yehoshua