NB:Accounts of Yeshua’s resurrection appearances: Matthew 28; Mark 16; Luke 24
 
1 Now on the first (heis[G], echad[H]) day of the week Miriyam[H] (rebellion, Mary) of Magdala[A] (a tower) came early in the morning (proi[G], fourth watch: 3am – 6am, ba’boker[H]) while it was still dark (choshekh[H]), to the tomb, grave (mnemeion[G], ha-kaver[H]) and saw (blepo[G]) the stone (lithos[G]) removed (airo[G]) from the tomb, grave (mnemeion[G], ha-kaver[H]). 2 So she ran and came to Shimon[H] (Hears) K’fa[H] (Peter: rock) and to the other disciple (talmid[H]) whom Yeshua[H] loved as a dear friend (phileo[G]), and said to them, “They have taken the Lord (ho kurios[G]. HaAdonai[H]) from the tomb, grave (mnemeion[G], ha-kaver[H]), and I (ana[A] Aramaic is singular. The Greek is plural “we”) don’t know where they’ve placed Him.”
 
“On the first day of the week” means sometime between sundown Saturday (Shabbat) and sundown Sunday (Yom Rishon). This is three days and nights following Yeshua’s crucifixion on the Wednesday (Yom Revi’i), making this the day following the weekly Shabbat and not the Shabbat[H] Megas[G] (High Shabbat: John 19:31) of unleavened bread.
 
“Miriyam of Magdala came early in the morning while it was still dark”. The Greek “proi” refers to the fourth watch of night observed between 3am and 6am. Miriyam had waited until the completion of the Shabbat to come to the tomb. This shows a desperate devotion on the part of Miriyam, a kind of devotion that is sometimes looked down upon in faith communities as being “emotionalism”. It should be noted that Yeshua appears first to a woman, and not just any woman but a woman who had previously been considered of ill repute and out of whom Yeshua had cast sevenfold demonic forces (Luke 8:2).
 
The writer of John’s Gospel has pointed to Yeshua as God with us (Imanu-El) from the beginning and now makes a correlation between the beginning of creation and the beginning of Yeshua’s recreative act of resurrection which will birth a new creation for all who receive Him.
 
“While it was still dark…” Begins the recreation narrative and is to be compared to Genesis 1:2 “And the earth was a formless and desolately empty, and darkness was over the surface of the deep,”
 
Isaiah the prophet also prophecies these events…
 
“For behold, darkness will cover the earth
And deep darkness the peoples;
But the Lord will rise upon you
And His glory will appear upon you.
3 Nations will come to your light,
And kings to the brightness of your rising.” -Isaiah 60:2-3 NASB
 
“So she ran and came to Shimon[H] K’fa[H] and to the other disciple whom Yeshua[H] loved as a dear friend…” Yochanan the unnamed disciple and writer of this gospel is recording what Miriyam of Magdala had testified to.
 
“They have taken the Lord from the tomb, and I don’t know where they’ve placed Him.” The Aramaic “I” seems a better fit with the context, however the other gospels speak of “women” plural going to the grave which is equally likely to be what Miriyam is referring to. Therefore, both “I” and “We” are correct.
 
“They have taken Him” May refer to the Romans, the servants of the chief priests or to any other disgruntled group. Ironically later rabbinical Jewish polemics seeking to deny Yeshua’s resurrection claim that Yeshua’s own disciples took away His body in order to fabricate the resurrection.
 
3 So K’fa[H] (Peter: rock) and the other disciple (talmid[H]) left, and they were going to the tomb, grave (mnemeion[G], ha-kaver[H]). 4 The two were running together; and the other disciple (talmid[H]) swiftly outran K’fa[H] (Peter: rock), and came to the tomb, grave (mnemeion[G], ha-kaver[H]) first; 5 and he stooped down (parakupto[G]) to look (blepo[G]), and saw the linen strips (othonion[G]) lying there; however he did not go in.
 
Here Yochanan, one prone to humility none the less records accurately that he arrived at the tomb first but was hesitant to go in. One of the reasons for this may have been his association with the priesthood and the perceived Torah restrictions regarding priests and dead bodies. Another reason may have been fearful expectation. We can only surmise and conclude conjecture.
 
6 So Shimon[H] (Hears) K’fa[H] (Peter: rock) also came, following him (Yochanan), and he (Peter) entered the tomb (mnemeion[G], ha-kaver[H]); and he examined (theoreo[G])the linen strips (othonion[G]) lying there, 7 and the face-cloth (soudarion[G]) which had been on His head, not lying with the linen strips (othonion[G]) but folded up in a place by itself. 
 
Yochanan records K’fa (Peter) as being as tenacious as ever. It is K’fa who examines the tomb and the specific carved out birth where Yeshua had been laid. He checks the linen burial strips and investigates the folded face cloth.
 
The description of the grave cloths and face cloth is exceptional. The linen strips of grave cloths were lying as if the body had simply left through them without disrupting them, thus leaving them lying flat like the skin of a perforated seed pod. Second, the face cloth had been folded.
 
There is of course prolifically reported pseudo learned nonsense regarding the cloth being likened to a napkin being folded at the end of a Jewish meal. It is nonsense for a number of reasons. First, this is not an all-inclusive custom in Judaism nor can it be well documented as being the custom in the first century. Second, Yeshua was not finishing a meal, He was beginning a re-creation. Third, identifying a ritually defiled burial cloth with a napkin used to wipe the face during a meal is an abhorrent idea that breaks numerous Torah restrictions regarding ritual purity and spiritual cleansing.
 
What is important about the folded face cloth is that it denotes a transcendent and seemingly contradictory reality. Yeshua’s resurrected body moved through the linen strips leaving them lying there without need for folding, while at the same time the facecloth was likely removed by Yeshua and folded. This correlates to the fact that Yeshua will soon be recorded as having walked through walls into a room of locked doors while at the same time being in a corporeal state that allows T’oma to touch His wounds (v.19-28).
 
The message here is that the resurrected body is both corporeal and transcendent, solid and fluid, physical and spiritual and therefore meta-physical, super-natural. Most of all, this shows that time, space and matter are subject to Yeshua’s resurrected body. This affirms the Biblical Jewish belief in the meta-physical resurrection of the dead and directly opposes Gnosticism and its derivative Christian scholarship delusion of a heaven filled with the spirits of human beings devoid of corporeal nature. The promised Olam Haba (World to come) is both illuminated and affirmed by the New Testament accounts.
 
8 So the other disciple (talmid[H]) who had arrived at the tomb, grave (mnemeion[G], ha-kaver[H]) first then also entered, and he saw (eido[G]) and believed, was persuaded, trusted (pisteuo[G], vaya’amein[H]). 9 For they did not yet understand the Writing (Graphe[G], ha-Katuv[H], Scripture), that He must rise from the dead. 10 So the disciples (talmidim[H]) went away again to their own homes.
 
That which had been examined by K’fa was now seen by Yochanan and as a result Yochanan believed, trusted, was persuaded, certain of the reality of Yeshua the risen King Messiah.
At some later point in time Yochanan recalled that the Ketuvim (Writings) [the latter portion of the TaNaKH] had prophesied the Messiah’s resurrection:
 
“For You will not abandon my soul to Sheol;
You will not allow Your Holy One to see decay.” -Tehillim (Psalm) 16:10
 
Ref. Jonah (Ketuvim); Matt. 12:40; Acts 2:24-32 (HaBrit HaChadashah)
 
They returned to their own homes not because they believed Yeshua had been taken and couldn’t be found but rather because they truly believed Yeshua had been resurrected and may have presumed that He had already ascended to the Father God and would therefore not be seen by them again until the fullness of the Kingdom had come on earth as it is in the heavens.
 
11 But Miriyam[H] (rebellion, Mary) was standing outside the tomb, grave (mnemeion[G], ha-kaver[H]) weeping; so as she wept, she stooped down (parakupto[G]) to look (blepo[G]) into the tomb, grave (mnemeion[G], ha-kaver[H]); 12 and she saw clearly (theoreo[G]) two messengers [angels] (malakhim[H]) in brilliant whiteness (leukos[G]) sitting, one at the head and one at the feet, where the body of Yeshua[H] had been lying. 
 
Miriyam did not return to her home as K’fa and Yochanan had done. Behold this desperately hopeful woman who had been forgiven much and clearly had a sense of the transcendent reality that surrounded her. She weeps uncontrollably, sensing something she doesn’t fully understand, torn between grief and hope she stoops down to look into the tomb and sees two divine messengers sitting at each end of the cut out birth within the tomb where Messiah had been laid.
 
What Miriyam was seeing was a symbol of something that would transform earthly worship within time and space until the return of the King Messiah. She was looking at the heavenly reflection of the mercy seat of the Ark of the covenant. A Cheruv (Angel) at each side with wings outstretched to touch one another.
 
At that time in history the Holy of Holies was empty, devoid of the Ark of the Covenant which had been missing for centuries (last historically recorded as present during the inauguration of Solomon’s Temple 2 Chronicles 5, 6, 8; 35:3). How then was Israel to attain mercy through sacrifice? The answer is in Yeshua’s sacrifice and His blood offered on the mercy seat of the heavenly Ark for which the earthly Ark had been a shadow.
 
What Miriyam was seeing was the hope of glory, the mercy offered to all who would receive Yeshua’s saving work. Therefore, Yeshua had made it possible for all to enter the Holy of Holies through His blood. As Kohen HaGadol High Priest of the eternal priesthood (Psalm 110:4, Hebrews 5, 6, 7) Yeshua had made it possible for Miriyam (among others) to become priests of a transcendent “royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for God’s own possession, so that you may proclaim the praises of Him who called you out of darkness into His wonderful light” (1 K’fa 2:9). Based on his writings it seems that K’fa (Peter) came to understand this also.
 
This does not mean that gentile believers are a continuation of or have replaced Israel (ethnic, religious, chosen) but that God has afforded gentile believers a concession through the blood of Messiah that they might become part of the commonwealth of Israel (Ephesians 2:12) as humble members of God’s Kingdom. Gentile believers do well to remember that the New Covenant is given the Israel and Judah (Jeremiah 31:31-40) and that they are privileged to be adopted into God’s family but should maintain a humble respect for Israel considering it a privilege to have been afforded access to salvation through Israel and not in place of her.
 
13 And they said to her, “Dear woman (gune[G], ishah[H]), why are you weeping?” She answered them, “Because they have taken away my Lord (Adoniy[H]), and I do not see (eido[G]) where they placed Him.” 14 When she had said this, she turned around and saw, looked intently on (theoreo[G]) Yeshua[H]  standing there, and she did not see, perceive (eido[G]) that it was Yeshua[H].
 
There are both physical and spiritual reasons for Miriyam’s inability to identify Yeshua straight away.
 
We recall that there is a correlation here with the first creation, now sin affected, and the birth of a sinless new creation through Yeshua. The garden where the tomb was located relates to the garden of Eden and the Malakhim (Messengers, Angels) to the Cherubim of that garden tasked with guarding its entrance following the sin of Adam and Eve. We note that it was Eve who first took the fruit and that Miriyam is representative of Eve in this remez (hint). Eve had become blinded by sin and like her Miriyam was still blinded to some degree. Therefore, spiritually speaking she required Yeshua to free her from her blindness by naming her a redeemed daughter of God’s Kingdom through His death and resurrection.
 
On the other hand, physically speaking the resurrected body is devoid of the wear of human life and the effects of human existence within the fallen world and therefore appears starkly different to that of the temporal body. Some suggest that Yeshua’s beard having been torn may have disfigured His face, and that there may have been scaring from the terrible flogging and beating He had endured. Finally, “it was dark”. However, none of this can account for Miriyam being unable to recognise His voice at first (v.15). It seems that Miriyam’s tearful emotional state had temporarily clouded her judgement.
 
15 Yeshua[H] said to her, “Dear woman (gune[G], ishah[H]), why are you weeping? Whom do you seek?” Thinking that He was the gardener, she said to Him, “Adon[H] (Sir), if you have carried (bastazo[G]) Him away, tell me where you placed Him, and I will lift Him up (airo[G]).” 16 Yeshua[H] said to her, “Miriyam[H]!” She turned and said to Him in a language of the Hebrews, “Rabboniy[A]!” (which means, “my Teacher”) [My Great One].
 
The gardener allusion correlates to the first Adam. Yeshua is the “last Adam” (1 Corinthians 15:45).
 
Yeshua’s simple naming of Miriyam of Magdala brings to mind the words of HaMelekh Sh’lomo (King Solomon):
 
“My beloved speaks and says to me:
‘Arise, my love, my fair one,
    and come away;
11 for now the winter is past,
    the rain is over and gone.’” -Shir HaShirim (Song of songs) 2:10-11 NRSV
 
Simply by saying her name Yeshua frees Miriyam from emotional blindness and gives her super-real sight. Note that she “turns” to Him and sees Him in His resurrected glory and exclaims “Rabboniy” My Great One!
 
It is worth noting that although the New Testament infers that Yeshua was considered a Rabbi by some, it does not explicitly say that Yeshua received any form of rabbinical training. What the New Testament does denote is that He was a hard working labourer alongside His father for much of his life and while being a regular attendee at the synagogue and an observant Biblical Jew was not known to have a teaching and healing ministry until His thirties. We note that Yeshua therefore was qualified as the Rabbi not by human authority but by the authority of God. It is this in part that Miriyam is recognising when she exclaims “Rabboniy”.
 
“Rabbon” is the Aramaic equivalent to “Rabban” (Halichot Olam Tract. 1. c. 3. p. 25.), which is the Hebrew word given to religious teachers and leaders of great renown. In particular it was given to the heads of the central academy of the Sanhedrin. Gamli’el I, who is quoted in Acts 5:34-39, is known to Jewish history as Rabban Gamli’el.
 
It is important to note that the word “Rabbon” transliterated into the Greek text, is not known to have been used of human beings but is used often in the Talmud to call upon God as “Rabbono al olam” (Lord of the World) [Talmud Bavliy Taanit, fol. 20. 1. Sanhedrin, fol. 94. 1. Abot R. Nathan, c. 9. Bereshit Rabba, sect. 8. fol. 6. 4]. It is at least possible therefore, that Miriyam chose to say “Rabboniy” rather than “Rabbaniy” or “Rabbiy” because she had concluded by faith that Yeshua is Imanu-El (With us God), the “Lord of the World”.  
 
Yeshua reminds us that we are to place no others in the ultimate position of “Rabbi, Father , or Teacher”:
 
“But you are not to be called rabbi, for you have one teacher, and you are all students.  9 And call no one your father on earth, for you have one Father—the one in heaven. 10 Nor are you to be called teachers, for you have one teacher, the Messiah.” -Matthew 23:8-10
 
17 Yeshua[H] said to her, “Don’t cling to (haptomai[G]) Me, not yet (Oupo[G]), for I am ascending to the Father (Ho Pater[G], Ha Av[H]); but go to My brothers (achiym[H]) and say to them, ‘I am ascending (anabaino[G]) to My Father (Aviy[H]) and your Father (Aviychem[H]), to My God (Eliy[H]) and your God (Eloheiychem[H]).’” 18 Miriyam[H] (rebellion, Mary) of Magdala[A] (a tower) came and announced to the disciples (ha talmidim[H]), “I have seen with my eyes (horao[G]) the Lord (HaAdon[H]),” and that He had said these things to her.
 
The King James translation “Don’t touch Me” is inaccurate. The Greek “haptomai” means more than simply touching, it means to fasten oneself to another. Therefore, the better translation is “Don’t cling to (haptomai[G]) Me, not yet (Oupo[G])”.
 
Yeshua is not telling Miriyam to take her hands off Him, rather He is gently letting her know that now is not the time for a lengthy reunion because He is briefly ascending to the Father prior to appearing to the disciples over the following forty days before ultimately ascending to the right hand of the Father ten days prior to Shavuot (Pentecost) [Acts 1:9-11].
 
“but go to My brothers and say to them, ‘I am ascending to My Father and your Father, to My God and your God.” Literally this refers to Yeshua’s siblings, and by extension to all His brothers and sisters in God’s family. This is why Miriyam in obedience to His instruction goes and tells the disciples. In the case of His siblings, they had yet to believe in Him.
 
“My Father and your Father, to My God and your God” denotes Yeshua’s resurrection as a corporeal human being who is also God with us. He has made it possible for His brothers to say truly that God is their Father and God, while Yeshua Himself is seen as their brother and continues to submit His humanity to God as Father. Later T’oma will proclaim “My Lord and My God” in response to the reality of Yeshua’s resurrected Person.
 
“I have seen with my eyes (horao[G]) the Lord (HaAdon[H]),” and that He had said these things to her.” Yochanan the gospel writer is careful to note that Miriyam’s testimony is an eye witness account.
 
19 Now when it was evening on that day, the first (heis[G], echad[H]) day of the week, and when the doors were shut, inaccessible, locked (kleio[G]) where the disciples (ha talmidim[H]) were because of their fear of the Jewish religious leaders (Ioudaios[G], Yehudiym[H]), Yeshua[H] came and stood in their midst, and said to them, “Shalom lechem[H] (Peace, wholeness, wellbeing be to youplural).” 
 
“On the that day” Yom Rishon (Sunday), nearing the end of the day (“evening” here clearly refers to late afternoon prior to the completion of the Biblical Jewish day at sundown).
 
The disciples were meeting in secret behind locked doors for fear that the religious authorities who had been opposed to Yeshua might come looking for His disciples. It was not because of “their fear of the Jews” as some English translations foolishly render the text. Context denotes that the disciples who were themselves Jews were afraid of the religious Judeans who opposed Yeshua. Therefore to translate Ioudaios here as “Jews” is not only error, it is an affront to the gospel itself, and to the King Messiah (a Jew).
 
“Yeshua[H] came and stood in their midst, and said to them, “Shalom lechem.” The doors were locked, how did Yeshua come and stand in their midst? The only possibility is that He was able to walk through walls or materialize on the other side of doors. And yet, we know from the proceeding verses that His body was physical, corporeal, because T’oma touched Yeshua’s wounds. Therefore, the resurrected body of Messiah is not subject to the material fallen world. He is King of a new and transcendent creation and He has come into the room to reveal Himself to His faithful followers.
 
Note that Yeshua uses the familiar Hebrew greeting “Shalom lechem” Peace, wholeness and wellbeing be unto all of you. Peace Himself wishes them Peace.
 
20 And when He had said this, He showed them both His hands and His side. The disciples (ha talmidim[H]) then rejoiced when they saw the Lord. 21 So Yeshua[H] said to them again, “Shalom lechem[H] (Peace, wholeness, wellbeing be to you)”; just as the Father (Ho Pater[G], Ha Av[H]) has sent (apostello[G], shalach[H]) Me, I also send you [bid you to carry] (pempo[G], sholeiach[H]).” 
 
Yeshua has been sent as a shaliach by God to bring salvation to the Jewish people and the nations and now He sends His disciples to be Shaliachim (Sent ones) who “carry” the gospel of truth, the message of salvation through Yeshua.
 
The Hebrew shaliach meaning “sent one” is equivalent to the Greek apostello, from which we get the English apostle. Many today in the Church are adopting this title as one that sets them apart from other believers, making it a title of position over others. This could not be more contrary to the meaning of the word “apostle”. In Messiah Yeshua we are all apostles, shaliachim, sent ones, with One Ruler, Yeshua, the Head of the Body of Believers.
 
22 And when He had said this, He breathed (emphusao[G]) on them and said to them, “Take hold of (lambano[G]) the Holy Spirit (Ruach HaKodesh[H]). 23 If you send away, cancel, place an expiry on, forgive (aphiemi[G]) the sins (missing the mark of God’s Holiness, hamartia[G]) of any, their sins have been sent away, cancelled, have expired, are forgiven (aphiemi[G]) them; if a certain one (tis[G]) continues to hold (krateo[G]) his sin then his sin is retained (krateo[G]).”
 
Yeshua’s breathing on the disciples mirrors the creation of the first human being by the breath of God (Genesis 2:7). It is not the fullness of the outpouring of the Holy Spirit which would come some 50 days later but a transcendent symbolic act announcing the inception of the new creation.
 
“then the Lord God formed man from the dust of the ground, and breathed (vayipach[H]) into his nostrils the direct breath (neshamah[H]) of living (chayiym[H]); and the man became a living being (lenefesh chayah[H]).” -Bereishit (Genesis) 2:7 Author’s translation
 
All other animals were created and given both ruach (spirit) and nefesh (soul existence) due to the Spirt of God but only human beings were created by the direct breath neshamah of God. This sets humanity apart within creation. Today when liberalism equates animals and human beings it denies the truth of Scripture and insults God Who has made human beings in His image, likeness.
 
It is interesting to note that the second century Targum speaks of the King Messiah in this way:
 
"the Spirit went from between the wings of the cherubim, v’nesvayah and breathed upon Him (Manasseh) by the decree, or order of the word of the Lord.'' - Targum on 2 Chronicles 33:13
 
NB: Here Manasseh is a figure for the promised Messiah.
 
24 But T’oma[H] (twin), one of the twelve, who was called Didymus[G] (twofold), was not with them when Yeshua[H] came. 25 So the other disciples (talmidim[H]) were saying to him, “We have seen the Lord (HaAdon[H])!” But he said to them, “Unless I see in His hands the imprint of the nails, and put my finger into the nail wholes, and put my hand into His side, I will not believe, be convinced, be persuaded of (pisteuo[G], a’amiyn[H]).”
 
T’oma was no more faithless or disbelieving than any other disciple. He had not witnessed what they had witnessed and therefore, like them, needed to see it with his own eyes. The foolish defaming of his character by far too many Christian scholars is appalling.
 
In fact T’oma is in good company, after all, our rabbis say of Moses:
 
"he did not believe that Israel had sinned, but said, ‘if I do not see, I will not believe’" - Shemot Rabba, sect. 46. fol. 142. 2.
 
T’oma’s need to see for himself gave opportunity for an affirmation of the super-physical nature of Yeshua’s resurrected body.
 
26 And after eight days His disciples (talmidim[H]) were again inside, and T’oma[H] (twin) with them. Yeshua[H] came, the doors having been shut, inaccessible, locked (kleio[G]), and stood in their midst and said, “Shalom lechem[H] (Peace, wholeness, wellbeing be to you).” 27 Then He said to T’oma[H] (twin), “Place your finger here, and see My hands; and take your hand and put it into My side; and do not continue in disbelief, faithlessness, mistrust (apistos[G]), be faithful, trust, believe (pistos[G], ma’amiyn[H]).”
 
By first century Jewish measurement of time and according to Biblical time measurement the first and last days of a period are counted and therefore, “eight days later” means “a week later” in modern English. This is why the Jewish boy is circumcised on the eight day, which is one week from birth in accordance with the first day following the creation week.
 
Once again Yeshua appears in their midst, resurrected, transcendent, meta-physical.
 
Yeshua does not berate T’oma like some of our self-righteous scholars do but instead affords T’oma an opportunity to touch the evidence and encourages T’oma not to continue in disbelief.
 
 28 T’oma[H] (twin) answered and said to Him, “My Lord (Adoniy[H]) and my God (velohay[H])!” 29 Yeshua[H] said to him, “Because you have seen Me, you believe, trust, are persuaded (he’emaneta[H])? Happy (Makarios[G]) are they who did not see (eido[G]), and believe (hama’amiyniym[H]).”
 
T’oma says “Adoniy vElohay!” My Lord and My God! This is either the most heinous of blasphemies or Yeshua is God with us (Imanu-El) as the prophet promises (Isaiah 7:14). In order to determine which of the possibilities is true we must look at the response of Yeshua. Does Yeshua rebuke T’oma for blasphemy? Does Yeshua say, “I am your lord in a sense but I’m not God T’oma, be careful what you say.” NO, no and no! Yeshua says “Because you have seen Me you believe…” Believe what? That Yeshua is Lord and God.
 
Keep in mind what happened to Herod when the crowd later proclaimed concerning him, “This is the voice of God and not of a man!’ Immediately an angel of the Lord struck him, because he didn't give God the glory. He was eaten by worms and died.” (Acts 12:20-23). Therefore, if Yeshua were not God with us would the Angel of the Lord not also have struck Him down?
 
There are many implicit indications that Yeshua is Imanu-El (God with us), here is yet another allusion to Messiah as present manifest deity. Some Messianic Jewish scholars have said we should not be simplistic in calling Yeshua God, and to some degree this is true, He is God with us and is in the Father in Whom all things exist, however, nor should we be so subtle in our identification of Yeshua as God with us that we fail to convey the reality that only a fully God fully man Messiah is capable of fulfilling the promises of the prophets.
 
“Happy are they who did not see, and believe.” What a precious reassurance to all who have believed and all who will believe before He returns. I for one can testify to the happiness of belief in the yet to be seen Messiah Yeshua.
 
30 So then, many other miraculous signs (semeion[G],otot[H]) Yeshua[H] also worked in the presence of the disciples (talmidim[H]), which are not written in this book (baseipher[H]);
 
Yochanan the writer of this gospel makes it clear that his purpose in writing the gospel was not to detail every sign and wonder performed by Yeshua but rather to detail those aspects of Yeshua’s life and ministry which best revealed His eternal nature and redemptive role. Yochanan was aware that others had written more detailed gospels and that these were accessible to his readers.
 
31 but these have been written so that you may believe that Yeshua[H] is the Messiah (HaMashiach[H]), the Son of God (ho uihos ho Theos[G], HaBen HaElohim[H]) ; and that by believing (pisteuo[G], be’emunat’chem[H]) you may have living (chayiym[H]) in His Name (bish’mo[H]).
 
Ultimately Yochanan wrote his gospel “so that you may believe that Yeshua[H] is the Messiah, the Son of God; and that by believing you may have living in His Name.”
 
Some Greek manuscripts say “so that you may continue believing” while others say “so that you may, at a point in time, come to believe”. This has caused needless debate among scholars. Yochanan the Hebrew was thinking as a Hebrew and intended both meanings simultaneously, so that his gospel would continue to speak to both those who were believing and those who would believe. Once again we are afforded the opportunity to be set free from the false choices posed by Greco-Roman Western thinking Christian scholars. We choose “both and” rather than “this or that”. Seeking to know all is for the idolatrous, holding mystery in tension is for the courageous.
 
Copyright 2020 Yaakov Brown

1. What is your take on the cloud of witnesses mentioned in Hebrews 12, can we engage with them?
2. When Yeshua (Jesus) went to sheol (Holding place of the dead), did He preach to the dead or a specific order of captives?
3. It seems there is an emergence of tribal peoples throughout the world who are now claiming to be part of the 12 tribes of Israel. To date DNA testing has proven that these claims are erroneous. In addition, many Messianic believers who are Gentiles, and have no proven evidence of Jewish bloodline are wearing, Jewish Tallitot, Tzit tzit etc. Do you see this as another enemy tactic to dilute the unique ethno-religious identity of the Jewish people?
4. I hear people talking about the 10 lost tribes. Are there lost tribes?
5. I’ve heard it taught that women were uneducated in the first century CE And that this is why they weren’t allowed to teach in the early community of believers, is this true?
6. Could you explain the ancient Jewish Betrothal and Wedding practice?

1. What is your take on the cloud of witnesses mentioned in Hebrews 12, can we engage with them?

The allusion to the cloud of witnesses in Hebrews 12 is referring back to the list of those witnesses to God’s faithfulness who are listed in Hebrews 11, commonly known as the Faith Chapter. These witnesses, as can be seen from Hebrews 11, are the now deceased patriarchs and heroes of the Jewish faith. The writer of Hebrews, a Jew and a Cohen (Priest), knows that the witnesses he is referring to are deceased and that many of them are buried throughout the land of Israel, and that they are therefore uncontactable according to the teaching of Scripture regarding the dead (Hebrews 9:27).

In the parable of Lazarus and the Rich Man (Luke 16) Yeshua explains that while the dead are conscious, they are not able either to traverse the chasm between Gehinnom (torment) and Gan Eden (Paradise) nor (re: Lazarus etc. once they are finally deceased [Hebrews 9:27]) are they able to traverse the distance between Sheol and the present world. In my article on Saul, Samuel and the Witch of Eyndor, I explain why the events of 1 Samuel 28:3-21 are not describing the dead spirit of Samuel called up but rather an evil spirit that fools the witch and is used by God to condemn Saul. For further study please use the following link below:

http://www.bethmelekh.com/yaakovs-blog---14991514148914971493-15131500-1497150615111489/1-samuel-283-21-saul-and-the-witch-of-eyn-dor
​
The writer of the book of Hebrews is using the deceased Jewish witnesses of Hebrews 11 as a figurative example. When he says:

“Therefore, since we have such a great cloud of witnesses lying around us, let us also get rid of every weight and entangling sin. Let us run with endurance the race set before us, focusing on Yeshua, the author and perfecter of faith.” –Hebrews 12:1-2a
He is making a Drash (inquiry/comparative teaching) regarding how we should act in light of the figurative (not literal) cloud of witnesses that are buried throughout the land of Israel. We must remember that the writer is probably writing from the perspective of a priest living in the Land of Israel prior to the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE (AD). He then qualifies this teaching by instructing us, not to focus on the cloud of witnesses, but on Yeshua, the author and perfecter of our faith (The faith that our Jewish forebears shared in the coming Messiah Yeshua).

We cannot engage with this cloud of witnesses because they are deceased and according to Scripture (Hebrews 9:27) they are uncontactable. Those who do seek to speak to the dead are in fact speaking with demonic forces rather than the spirits of dead people (1 Timothy 4:1; 1 Corinthians 10:20-21; 2 Corinthians 11:14-15).

“Let no one be found among you who sacrifices his son or daughter in the fire, who practices divination or sorcery, interprets omens, engages in witchcraft, or casts spells, or who is a medium or spiritist or who consults the dead.” –Deuteronomy 18:10-12

Therefore, not only are we unable to engage with the dead witnesses of Hebrews 11-12, we are also commanded by God not to attempt to speak with the dead.

2. When Yeshua (Jesus) went to Sheol (Holding place of the dead), did He preach to the dead or to a specific order of captives?

The text this question refers to is 1 Peter 3:14-21:

“If you suffer for righteousness' sake, be glad: and don’t be afraid of their terror, neither be troubled; But sanctify (Kiddush) HaShem (Merciful) Elohiym (Judge) in your core being (heart): and be ready always to give an answer to every human being that asks you the reason for the hope that is in you with humility and reverent awe: Having a good conscience; that, whereas they speak evil of you, as of evildoers, they may be ashamed who falsely accuse your good conduct in Messiah. For it’s better if God’s will is that you suffer for doing well than for doing evil. For Messiah also at one time suffered for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, that He might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh but made alive in the Ruach (Spirit). By Whom (The Spirit) He also went and made proclamation to the ruachiym (spirits) in prison (phulake: foo-lak-ay). Who were formerly disobedient, when at one time the longsuffering God waited in the days of Noach (Comfort), while the ark was being prepared, in which a few, that is eight souls (nefesh) were saved by water (mikveh: gathering of water). This figurative likeness being a representation of the immersion (baptism) that now also saves us (not the washing of the flesh but the earnest seeking of a good conscience toward God) by the resurrection of Yeshua (Jesus) Messiah.”
 –1 Peter  3:17-21
 
In the context of Peter’s letter, the community of believers is being encouraged to share their faith with anyone who asks, and not to shy away from suffering if that is what God’s will entails. Peter then offers Yeshua as an example of One Who suffered and shared His message in the Spirit of God. It is explained that Yeshua’s suffering puts to death the sinful practices of the flesh and resurrects each believer in the life giving Spirit of God. It is by this same Spirit that the resurrected Messiah (not in sheol) transcends time and space, and thus traverses time and space by the Spirit, to proclaim His saving work to those spirits of human beings who were still living in the flesh at the time of Noah prior to the flood. The text explains that during the time of Noah only eight imprisoned spirits received Yeshua’s message and were delivered through the figurative tevilah immersion (baptism) of the flood, which the author shows to be a prefigure of the same tevilah immersion (baptism) that believers in Messiah have received unto salvation.

From the p’shat (plain) meaning of the text and the subsequent, remez (hint), drash (comparative) and sod (mystery), we see that it does not place Yeshua in sheol in relation to His proclamation but shows that it is by the Spirit of God following His resurrection that He spoke to the imprisoned spirits of humanity past. This text is not teaching anything even remotely to do with communicating with imprisoned dead people or angelic spirits. To the contrary, it simply teaches that God is just and that all humanity from Adam to the end of days has and will have an opportunity to either reject or receive the message of Messiah. This text shows how in the Spirit (of God), the resurrected Messiah transcends time and space and manifests the supernatural reality that He was both literally and figuratively slain before the foundation of the world (Revelation 13:8).

3. It seems there is an emergence of tribal peoples throughout the world who are now claiming to be part of the 12 tribes of Israel. To date DNA testing has proven that these claims are erroneous. In addition, many Messianic believers who are Gentiles, and have no proven evidence of Jewish bloodline are wearing, Jewish Tallits, Tzit tzit etc. Do you see this as another enemy tactic to dilute the unique ethno-religious identity of the Jewish people?  

Yes I do. Ethnic, empirical, religious Israel, the descendants of Yaakov (Jacob) have a unique role to play in history, past, present and future. The enemy Satan has consistently sought to either wipe out the ethnic identity of the Jewish people and or make her identity generic in a desperate attempt to resist the plans of God. Satan has done this through popular Christian theology, Supersessionism, Continuationism, British Israel, the Lost Tribes myth, to name a few, and is now doing it by utilizing well-meaning so called Messianic Gentiles who have come to believe the lie that their own culture is somehow less important than the Jewish culture.
 
Allow me to offer an example: I love the Maori people, the indigenous people of Aeotearoa (New Zealand), but I don’t have an ancestral Maori tattoo. I don’t have even an ounce of Maori blood in my body. I have Ashkenazi Jewish blood, Italian blood, South American blood, English blood, German blood, but not an ounce of Maori blood. Therefore I will not desecrate the Maori culture by getting a sacred Maori tattoo. The sacred elements of Maori culture belong to the Maori people and are an intrinsic part of their God given unique identity.
 
If you don’t have any Jewish blood, don’t attempt to steel our sacred God given identity. Those who are not Jewish but wear tzit tzit and kippot etc. or claim, erroneously that they are members of the house of Ephraim (their DNA proves otherwise), are doing the very thing they accuse the Replacement and Superssesionist theologians of doing. They are seeking to replace ethnic, empirical, religious Israel. It is sin, don’t become entangled in it! It not only defiles God’s chosen people, it also defiles you and your beautiful, unique ethnic identity.

4. I hear people talking about the 10 lost tribes. Are there lost tribes?  

There are no lost tribes. In approximately 540 BCE after the return of the tribes of Israel from exile in Babylon, all the tribes became united under the remnant of Judah who had remained in the land. Thus all Hebrews regardless of tribe took on the common title Yehudi (Jew), which became a term synonymous with Israel. From this point in time the Jewish people, consisting of the 12 tribes experienced various dispersions, the greatest of which occurred following the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE.
 
The biblical book of Yaakov (James) affirms this understanding when it refers to the “12 tribes scattered throughout the world.” In fact the Biblical book of Yaakov (James) was written specifically to the Jews (the twelve tribes of Israel).
 
There are specific DNA markers in the various groups of dispersed Jews throughout the world that offer irrefutable evidence of the various tribes within the Jewish nation. The terms Israelite and Jew have been synonymous since the sixth century BCE (BC).

5. I’ve heard it taught that Jewish women were uneducated in the first century CE (AD) And that this is why they weren’t allowed to teach in the early community of believers, is this true?  

This is simply not true. This foolish teaching finds very limited supported in the singular works of Ben Sira a Hellenistic Jewish scribe, sage, and allegorist from Jerusalem. His works contradict the wealth of Jewish tradition and teaching regarding women, and are often interpreted out of context. Women have been teachers, prophets and leaders of Israel throughout history. These include, Miriyam the sister of Moses, Ruth, Esther, Miriyam the mother of the Messiah, Devorah the prophetess etc.
 
Many are unaware that the ancient synagogues of Israel had no partitions separating men and women. The 2nd century Synagogue in Capernaum by the Galilee is a replica of the Synagogue that stood beneath it. I’ve stood there and seen for myself the open seating. In fact men and women sat together to listened to the Torah in the synagogues of first century Israel. How then could they have been uneducated?
 
From ancient times the women of Israel have been tasked with the greatest of teaching roles. That of teaching our children the core doctrines and practices of the Jewish faith. I ask then, if they were uneducated, how did they teach the Torah to countless generations of young Jews? How did they pass on the prayer tradition and Halakhah of Israel to subsequent generations?

6. Could you explain the ancient Jewish betrothal and wedding practice?  

There are many localized variations regarding minor themes concerning the ancient Jewish betrothal and marriage customs, however, the primary themes are consistent throughout Jewish history and practice, and continue to find a place of prominence in the modern Jewish wedding ceremony. I will answer this question by explaining the common primary themes of the ancient Jewish betrothal and marriage. They are themes that arise from both Scripture and tradition and have been perpetuated for thousands of years. They are a living allegory for the great mystery of God’s relationship to Israel (empirical, ethnic) and of the relationship between Messiah Yeshua and the Ecclesia (Messianic community of believers). As such, they transcend their temporal function and become a picture of our eternal hope as believers, in love relationship with God.

Much of the information that follows is taken from both Biblical and Talmudic sources. The information from Talmudic sources, while not codified until a much later date, does pass on an oral tradition dating back to a time long before the Messiah’s birth. Many of the Talmudic articles on the subject of marriage affirm the spiritual allegory attributed to Messiah and His bride and are therefore a valid commentary on the events that continue to transpire regarding the second coming of Yeshua our Mashiyach and Chatan (groom).

a.) SHIDUKHIN (ARRANGEMENT)—SELECTION OF THE BRIDE:

From ancient days it has always been the father of the groom who selects his son’s bride. In cases where it is not practical for the father to go to the home of the bride to arrange things, he sends a Shadkhan (arranger/matchmaker). This is exactly what happened in the case of Abraham’s selecting of a bride for his son Isaac:

“Avraham said to his servant (Eli-eytzer/My God is my helper, comforter), the oldest of his household, who had charge of all that he owned, ‘Please place your hand under my thigh, and I will make you swear by HaShem, the God of heaven and the God of earth, that you shall not take a wife for my son from the daughters of the Canaanites, among whom I live, but you will go to my country and to my relatives, and take a wife for my son Yitzchak.” –Genesis 24:2-4

The Scriptures remind us that we were chosen by The Father (God) from before the creation of the world:

“Just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we would be holy and blameless before Him.” –Ephesians 1:4

Yeshua reminds us that:

“You did not choose Me but I chose you, and appointed you that you would go and bear fruit.” –Yochanan/John 15:16

b.) THE BRIDE MUST ACCEPT THE PROPOSAL:

In Jewish culture no woman may be forced to marry. Without the prospective brides acceptance of the marriage proposal there can be no marriage.
In Rebekah’s case, she had not seen her husband to be (Yitzchak), but accepted his proposal based on the word of the servant (Eli-eytzer, My God is a helper). This is also true of each of us who have accepted Yeshua’s proposal having had it offered to us at the hands of the Ruach Ha-Kodesh (Holy Spirit/The Helper).

“The servant said to him, ‘Suppose the woman is not willing to follow me to this land; should I take your son back to the land from where you came?’” –Genesis 24:5

“Then they called Rebekah and said to her, ‘Will you go with this man?’ And she said, ‘I will go.’” –Genesis 24:58

We must remember that it is Yeshua as the Jewish bridegroom (Chatan) Who always initiates the love relationship and that it is God Who selects us and not the other way around:

“We love Him because He first loved us.” –1 John 4:19

c.) THE MOHAR—BRIDE PRICE:

rom ancient times brides in Israel were purchased, a bride price (mohar) was paid as a means of showing that the groom valued the woman he was to marry. The price varied depending on the circumstances of those involved. In Yaakov’s (Jacob) case, he worked seven years as the bride price for Leah and Rachel respectively. (Genesis 29:20)
To the modern reader this may seem to denigrate women, treating them as property rather than valued equals, however, in the context of the Biblical society the opposite was true. The pagan nations surrounding Israel were taking women to wife without ceremony or consideration of a woman’s value. When a wife displeased a husband in these communities she was tossed aside and replaced without consequence, often left to fend for herself and in many cases to die without provision because men were the providers of a family’s income and protection.

The value placed upon a Jewish bride was a means of protecting her and valuing her as a person rather than an object of property for men to abuse. The fact that a husband, “owned,” his wife was not demeaning in the least, it was a sign to other men and to the bride, that she was cared for and valued. The Hebrew word for wife, Be’ulah, means, “owned,” and the Hebrew word for husband, Ba’al, means, “master or owner”.

“When Avraham’s servant heard their words, he bowed himself to the ground before HaShem. 53 The servant brought out articles of silver and articles of gold, and garments, and gave them to Rebekah; he also gave precious things to her brother and to her mother.” –Genesis 24:52-53

Yeshua has paid the highest price as a mohar for His bride by dying on the tree:

“You were bought with a price; do not become slaves of men.” –1 Corinthians 7:23

“(Yeshua) Who is given as a pledge of our inheritance, with a view to the redemption of God’s own possession, to the praise of His glory.” –Ephesians 1:14

“Knowing that you were not purchased with perishable things like silver or gold from your futile way of life inherited from your forefathers, 19 but with precious blood, as of a lamb unblemished and spotless, the blood of Messiah.” –1 Peter 1:18-19

“Or do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit Who is in you, Whom you have from God, and that you are not your own? For you have been bought with a mohar (price): therefore glorify God in your body.” –1 Corinthians 6:19-20

d.) KETUBAH (WRITTEN)/ EYRUSIN (BETROTHAL)/ KIDUSHIN (SANCTIFICATION):

Following the shidukhin (arrangement) by the father via his shadkhan (Matchmaker) the acceptance of the proposal by the bride and the offering of the gift by the groom; a binding covenant was entered into and a ketubah (written) document was signed. This process, known as both Eyrusin (betrothal) and kidushin (sanctification from Kadosh [Holy], meaning set apart), was conducted approximately one year prior to the actual marriage ceremony and was considered binding. So much so, that a divorce or get (Hebrew) must be obtained by the husband in order to dissolve the betrothal. It’s important to note that only a husband can initiate a get (divorce) [Deuteronomy 24:1-4].

This is an affirmation of eternal security for the believer. Our security is not dependent on us because we’re not able to break our engagement once we’ve entered into the agreement. Only the groom can break the betrothal and Yeshua has no intention of doing so:

“I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one will snatch them out of my hand. My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all; no one can snatch them out of my Father’s hand. I and the Father are one.” –Yochanan/John 10:28-30

“If we are faithless, He remains faithful; He cannot disown Himself.” –2 Timothy 2:15

e.) MIKVEH (Immersion/Baptism):

Prior to the Eyrusin (Betrothal) rite, both the groom and the bride tevilah totally immerse themselves in a ritual bath (Mayim chayim—living water) of purification called a mikveh (Gathering of water). Yeshua was immersed by the forerunner Yochanan in preparation for His Eyrusin (Betrothal). Likewise as believers we enter into the mikveh of tevilah immersion (baptism) as a sign of our new beginning, identifying with Messiah’s immersion, His death and resurrection.
The mikveh is a symbol of a fresh start, a new beginning, a new family unit which is to be born of the married couple.
Following their tevilah (immersion) in the mikveh (gathering of water) the Eyrusin (Betrothal) ceremony took place under a Chuppah (canopy). In ancient times the Chuppah was a separate room in the groom’s father’s home, later the tradition of a canopy developed.

The Chuppah is a symbol of a new household and of God’s protective covering over the couple and their future progeny. It is also a sukkah (booth) which promises that God will one day Mishkhan (tabernacle, dwell) in the midst of His people for all eternity:

“As a bridegroom coming out of his chamber (Chuppah); rejoicing as a strong man to run his course.” –Tehillim/Psalm 19:5
“Gather the people, sanctify the congregation, assemble the elders, gather the children and the nursing infants. Let the bridegroom come out of his room (Chuppah) and the bride out of her bridal chamber (Chuppah).” –Yo’el/Joel 2:16

f.) THE CUP:

During the Eyrusin (Betrothal) ceremony gifts/rings are exchanged and a cup of wine is shared. The Kiddush (sanctification) cup used in this ceremony is kept to be used again at the wedding ceremony in a years’ time. In ancient times the cup was most likely made of hardened clay: today a thin wine glass is used.

On the night He was betrayed, Yeshua offered His bride to be (Israel—empirical, ethnic and the birthing Ecclesia), a new covenant in blood, a wine cup, a kiddush (sanctifying) cup. This cup, the third cup of the Pesach/Passover Seder, taken after the main meal, is called Kos Ge’ulah (cup of redemption):

“In the same way, after the supper he took the cup, saying, ‘This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you.’” –Luke 22:20

“’For I tell you I will not drink again from the fruit of the vine until the kingdom of God comes.’” –Luke 22:18

Following the Eyrusin (Betrothal) ceremony the couple is considered married in every way except for cohabitation and sexual relations. Both bride and groom live apart for approximately one year. Something similar is seen in the length of time between Rebekah’s acceptance of Isaac’s proposal and their marriage in Canaan sometime later.

The year was used by the groom as a time of preparation. It was traditional in the ancient Middle East for the groom to leave the bride’s home town and return to His father’s house where he would build a room onto his father’s dwelling that would serve as the couple’s chadar (wedding chamber) following their marriage ceremony. The parallels with Yeshua and His bride are obvious. Yeshua has gone to prepare a place for us:

“In My Father’s house are many dwelling places; if it were not so, I would have told you; for I go to prepare a place for you. If I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and receive you to Myself, that where I am, there you may be also.” –Yochanan/John 14:2-3

Likewise, the bride spends the year in preparation for her groom’s return. She is to be ready at any hour of the day as the year draws to a close. She prepares items for her future home and a pure white dress for the wedding day.
We are reminded in the Scriptures that we should invest our time in those things which are eternal:

 “Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy, and where thieves break in and steal. But store up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys, and where thieves do not break in or steal;” –Mattitiyahu/Matthew 6:19

g.) THE RETURN OF THE GROOM:

Tradition dictates that only the father of the groom may decide on the time for the groom’s return, neither the groom nor the bride know at what hour the groom will return to carry the bride to the wedding feast.

“But of that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but the Father alone.” –Mark 13:32

In many cases, as the year of waiting drew to a close, the bride’s household would wait late into the night, keeping oil lamps lit in case of the groom’s return. This tradition became common among certain groups and is still practised in some communities today. The groom would often return at night.

“But at midnight there was a shout, ‘Behold, the bridegroom! Come out to meet him.’” –Mattitiyahu/Matthew 25:6

The implications for us as believers are clear, we are to prepare ourselves and be constantly ready for our groom’s return.

The groom would return, often late at night, with a procession of family and friends from his father’s household, shouting out, with torches burning and the shofar sounding to herald his coming.

“For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel and with the shofar of G-d, and the dead in Messiah will rise first. Then we who are alive and remain will be carried away (nisuin, to carry) together with them in the cloud (of His presence) to meet the Lord in the fresh air, and so we shall always be with the Lord.” –1 Thessalonians 4:16-17

The groom’s entourage would be carrying an aperion (a seated canopy, carried on the shoulders of men). He would pick up his bride and place her in the aperion thus carrying her away to her new home.

The bride would cover her face with a veil and intermittently along the way the groom would check under her veil to ensure he had carried away the right bride. This tradition is called bedeken and came about due to the problems experienced by Yaakov (Jacob) at the hands of Laban his father in law, when he deceived him on his wedding night by substituting Leah for Rachel.

There is a beautiful modern Hassidic practise among many Charediym (Orthodox/Pious) that combines both the night time arrival of the groom and the peeking behind the veil. It involves two men carrying Havdalah candles as they approach the bride walking arm in arm with the groom. They come with the groom at night and approach the betrothed woman’s home with the multi-wicked candles lit. The bride is veiled and awaiting the groom dressed in pure white. As the community chants traditional Hebrew songs, the groom is led by candle light to meet His bride, who is surrounded by her female attendants. Once the groom is standing before her, he unveils her face and leads her to the place where the wedding ceremony will take place.

h.) NISUIN (TO CARRY) THE CHUPPAH:

The Nisuin (Wedding) ceremony is the last stage of the betrothal and marriage. The Chuppah (canopy) was a specially made embroidered canopy or a tallit (prayer shawl) held up by four poles. It was representative of the bridal chamber.
The groom enters the proceedings first, as the rabbi calls out, “Baruch haba b’shem Adonai,” blessed is he who comes in the name of the L-rd. The groom stands on the left hand side, then the bride enters to the call, “B’rukhah haba’ah b’shem Adonai,” blessed is she who comes in the name of the Lord.

“O HaShem, do save, we beseech You; O HaShem, we beseech You, do send prosperity! Blessed is He who comes in the name of the HaShem; We have blessed you from the house of the HaShem. HaShem is Elohiym, and He has given us light; Bind the festival sacrifice with cords to the horns of the altar.” –Tehillim/Psalm 118:25-27

The bride walks around the groom either three or seven (depending on the local tradition) times as a symbol of her willingness to consecrate herself to her groom. Three times is symbolic of God’s three-fold betrothal to Israel:

“’I will betroth you to Me forever; Yes, I will betroth you to Me in righteousness and in justice (1), In loving kindness (chesed) and in compassion (2), And I will betroth you to Me in faithfulness (3). Then you will know HaShem [YHVH] (Mercy).’” –Hosea 2:19-20

Seven is a symbolic promise of the bridal week and the completeness found in marriage. Mirroring the completeness of the creation week and the Shabbat rest of God.

The bride then stands to the right of her groom.

i.) SHE’VA BRACHOT (Seven blessings):

​The She’va Brachot (seven blessings) are pronounced beginning with the blessing over the Kiddush cup (the same cup used during the Erusiyn betrothal rite), but the cup is not drunk until the blessings are completed. These blessings are also known as Birkat Nisuin (blessings of being carried away):

ברוך אתה ה' אלהינו מלך העולם, בורא פרי הגפן.
Transliteration: Barukh ata Adonai Eloheinu melekh ha olam, bo'rei p'ri hagafen.
Translation: "Blessed are You, HaShem, our God, sovereign of the universe, who creates the fruit of the vine."

ברוך אתה ה' אלהינו מלך העולם, שהכל ברא לכבודו.
Transliteration: Barukh ata Adonai Eloheinu melekh ha olam shehakol bara lichvodo.
Translation: "Blessed are You, HaShem, our God, sovereign of the universe, who created everything for His Glory."

ברוך אתה ה' אלהינו מלך העולם, יוצר האדם.
Transliteration: Barukh ata Adonai Eloheinu melekh ha olam, yotzer haa’dam.
Translation: "Blessed are You, HaShem, our God, sovereign of the universe, who creates man."

ברוך אתה ה' אלהינו מלך העולם, אשר יצר את האדם בצלמו, בצלם דמות תבניתו, והתקין לו ממנו בניין עדי עד. ברוך אתה ה', יוצר האדם.
Transliteration: Barukh ata Adonai Eloheinu melekh ha olam, asher yatzar et ha-adam b’tzalmo, b’tzelem d’mut tavnito, v’hitkin lo mimenu binyan adei ad. Baruch atah Adonai, yotzeir ha-adam.
Translation: "Blessed are You, HaShem, our God, sovereign of the universe, who creates humanity in your image (likeness), fashioning perpetuated life. Blessed are You, HaShem, creator of humanity."

שוש תשיש ותגל העקרה, בקיבוץ בניה לתוכה בשמחה. ברוך אתה ה', משמח ציון בבניה.
Transliteration: Sos tasis v’tageil ha-akara b’kibutz baneha l’tocha b’simcha. Baruch ata Adonai, m’sameach Tzion b’vaneha.
Translation: "May the barren one exult and be glad as her children are joyfully gathered to her. Blessed are You, Hashem, who gladden Zion with her Children."

שמח תשמח רעים האהובים, כשמחך יצירך בגן עדן מקדם. ברוך אתה ה', משמח חתן וכלה.
Transliteration: Sameiach tesamach reiim ha-ahuvim k’sameichacha y’tzircha b’gan eden mikedem. Baruch ata Adonai, m’sameiach chatan v’chalah.
Translation: "Grant perfect joy to these loving companions, as you did your creations in the Garden of Eden. Blessed are You, HaShem, who grants the joy of groom and bride."

ברוך אתה ה' אלהינו מלך העולם, אשר ברא ששון ושמחה, חתן וכלה, גילה רינה, דיצה וחדווה, אהבה ואחווה, ושלום ורעות, מהרה ה' אלקינו ישמע בערי יהודה ובחוצות ירושלים, קול ששון וקול שמחה, קול חתן וקול כלה, קול מצהלות חתנים מחופתם, ונערים ממשתה נגינתם. ברוך אתה ה', משמח חתן עם הכלה.
Transliteration: Baruch ata Adonai Eloheinu melech ha-olam, asher bara sason v’simcha chatan v’kallah, gilah rinah ditzah v’chedvah, ahavah v’achavah v’shalom v’reut. M’hera Adonai Eloheinu yishammah b’arei Yhudah uv-chutzot Y’rushalayim kol sason v’kol simcha, kol chatan v’kol kalah, kol mitzhalot chatanim meichupatam u-n'arim mimishte n’ginatam. Baruch ata Adonai, m’sameiach chatan im hakalah.
Translation: "Blessed are You, Hashem, our God, sovereign of the universe, who created joy and gladness, groom and bride, mirth, song, delight and rejoicing, love and harmony and peace and companionship. Soon, Hashem our God, may there ever be heard in the cities of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem voices of joy and gladness, voices of groom and bride, the jubilant voices of those joined in marriage under the bridal canopy, the voices of young people feasting and singing. Blessed are You, HaShem, who causes the groom to rejoice with his bride."

THE CUP #2:

Following the blessings the Kiddush cup (the same cup used in the Eyrusin ceremony of betrothal) is drunk by both groom and bride and is then wrapped in a napkin and shattered beneath the groom’s foot.

“For I tell you I will not drink again from the fruit of the vine until the kingdom of God comes.” –Luke 22:18

The breaking of the cup is a more recent addition to the ceremony but it holds great significance. Originally the rabbis added the shattering of the cup in order to remind those present that even in joyous times we remember the destruction of the temple and Israel’s suffering. However the symbolism is also powerfully representative of the fact that no one else can ever drink from the cup that the married couple have shared. The covenant of marriage is sacred and sealed forever in the sight of God. This is also the case regarding our marriage to Yeshua.

The marriage is then consummated in the bridal chamber (chadar), following which the groom calls out to the shadkhan (matchmaker) or friend of the groom, letting him know that the marriage has been consummated.

 “And Yeshua said unto them, ‘Can the attendants of the bride chamber mourn as long as the bridegroom is with them? But the days will come when the bridegroom shall be taken from them, and then shall they fast.’” –Mattitiyahu/Matthew 6:15

The couple then celebrates an elaborate wedding feast with their guests. The feast is followed by a seven day period together in seclusion, in order to complete the marriage week.

All of these events remind us of the Messianic community’s coming marriage to Yeshua. We will be carried away, and join with Him in spiritual marriage. He will finally drink again of the Kiddush cup with us and we will celebrate with Him at the wedding feast of the Lamb of God.

“’Let us rejoice and be glad and give the glory to Him, for the marriage of the Lamb has come and His bride has made herself ready.’ It was given to her to clothe herself in fine linen, bright and clean; for the fine linen is the righteous acts of the saints. Then he said to me, ‘Write, “Blessed are those who are invited to the marriage supper of the Lamb.”’ And he said to me, ‘These are true words of God.’” –Revelations 19:7-9

RENEWED COVENANT SCRIPTURES REGARDING BETROTHAL & MARRIAGE:

• Legally free to marry & purposed for fruit
“Therefore, my Jewish brothers and sisters, you also were made to die from the Torah’s perspective (regarding marriage to sin), through the body of Messiah, so that you might be joined to another, to Him who was raised from the dead, in order that we might bear fruit for God.” –Romans 7:4

We are dead to sin through the covenant blood of Messiah Yeshua and are therefore free to remarry. Yeshua is our groom and we marry for the purpose of bearing fruit.

• Shidukin (arrangement, match making)/ Eyrusin (betrothal)/ Ketubah (it is written)
“For I am jealous for you with a godly jealousy; for I have betrothed you to one husband, so that to Messiah I might present you as a pure virgin.” –2 Corinthians 11:2

In this text Shaul/Paul is the Shadkhan (match maker, arranger).

• Nisuin (to carry)/ Kidushin (Sanctification, from kadosh [Holy] set apart)—Marriage

“Wives, be subject to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, as Messiah also is the head of the Messianic Community, He Himself being the Saviour of the body. But as the Messianic Community is subject to Messiah, so also the wives ought to be to their husbands in everything. Husbands, love your wives, just as Messiah also loved the Messianic Community and gave Himself up for her (bride price), so that He might sanctify (Kidushin) her, having cleansed her by the washing of water (Mikveh) with the word, that He might present to Himself the Messianic Community in all her glory, having no spot or wrinkle or blemish; but that she would be holy (Set apart) and blameless. So husbands ought also to love their own wives as their own bodies. He who loves his own wife loves himself; for no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, just as Messiah also does the Messianic Community, because we are members of His body. ‘FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND SHALL BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH.’ (Gen. 2:24) This mystery (sod) is great; but I am speaking with reference to Messiah and the Messianic Community.” –Ephesians 5:22-32

In this text Shaul/Paul uses the example of the Jewish betrothal and marriage (P’shat) to touch (Remez) on a much deeper understanding (Sod) of our relationship (Drash) with Yeshua. This mystery is in part available to all who understand the process of Jewish marriage from betrothal to the wedding chamber.
​
© Yaakov Brown 2017

The trust of Hebrews 11:1 is emunah (אמונה) whereas the trust of Proverbs 3:5-6 is b'tach (בטח). They have similarities but are different forms of trust. Emunah (אמונה) is trust completed outside of time and space, whereas b'tach (בטח) is the trust we apply within time and space in order to recieve the trust (emunah: אמונה) that transcends time and space. B'tach (בטח) is a temporary trust that must be chosen continually, it leads us to the eternal trust (emunah: אמונה) that continually chooses us.

Introduction:
In Rashi’s view the events of Chapter 18 follow directly on from the previous chapter, taking place three days after Avraham’s circumcision. I see no reason for disputing this. Even if understood as a tradition rather than an inspiration, Rashi’s idea adds to our understanding rather than detracting from it. If Rashi is correct, Avraham is now at the most painful stage of the healing process and is sitting, not only due to the heat of the day but also due to his need for rest and recovery.
​
As in the case of the previous events, this Divine encounter (theophany) and its outcome teach us a number of spiritual principles and further illuminate the character of G-d and the nature of humanity. The Holy Name of G-d YHVH, which denotes mercy, is used eleven times in this account (12 if the rabbinical interpretation of Adonai in verse 3 is accepted). This seems unusual given that the latter emphasis of the account is on the coming judgement against S’dom and Amorrah. However, it seems that G-d appears to Avraham as Mercy Himself for the purpose of conveying the idea that mercy triumphs over judgement. Avraham in turn, trusting the heart of G-d, becomes a type for the Messiah, pleading for justice seasoned with mercy, something that G-d intended all along.

With regard to Avraham and Sarah, a stark contrast is drawn between trust and disbelief. We are challenged by both Avraham’s eager hospitality and loving kindness, and by Sarah’s disbelief and denial.

When compared to chapter 19, this noon encounter stands in stark contrast to the night scene in Sodom. In the full light of midday G-d comes to Avraham for an intimate meeting of promise, sustenance, common unity and intercession. This is both a beginning and a counterpoint to the events of chapter 19, where in the darkness of night, an already condemned city establishes its wickedness by seeking to soil G-d’s messengers with acts of moral decay born of a depraved worldview, thus refusing intercession. The resulting destruction answers the loveless squalor of the citizens of S’dom and Amorrah, who have rejected G-d’s mercy outright. There is a correlation to Yeshua’s (Jesus) Revelation to Yochanan (John) here.

Verses 1-5 add nothing to the promises of 17:15. What differentiates the accounts is the intimate setting and the challenge to Sarah’s faith or lack thereof. The final result will be Sarah’s decision to trust G-d for the child, in response to His disciplining of her by way of a gentle challenge:

“By trust even Sarah herself received ability to conceive when she was barren and past the age, since she considered the One who had made the promise to be trustworthy.” – Hebrews 11:11

Gen 18:1 And HaShem (YHVH: Mercy) appeared to him (Avraham) at the trees of Mamrei (strength): and he (Avraham) sat in the tent door in the heat of the day;
 
What is clear from the outset is that HaShem Himself is appearing to Avraham. Regardless of how we interpret what follows, we must not lose sight of this fact. Accepting Rashi’s assertion, I see this scene set with the recovering Avraham seated at midday in the shade of his tent, still in a great deal of pain from having been obedient to G-d’s instruction to circumcise both himself and all the males of his household.
 
Whether we interpret, “the trees” or, “the plain” of Mamrei (strength), the result is the same. Having been obedient to G-d Avraham finds that in his weakness G-d is his strength.
 
“By trusting they conquered kingdoms, administered justice, obtained promises, shut the mouths of lions, quenched the power of fire, escaped the edge of the sword, were made strong out of weakness…” –Hebrews 11:33-34a
 
Gen 18:2 And he lifted up his eyes and looked, and, behold, three men stood by him: and when he saw them, he ran to meet them from the tent door, and prostrated himself on the ground,
 
“Lifted up his eyes” suggests that Avraham was either at rest or in prayerful meditation prior to this theophany (Divine visitation).
 
Avraham’s response to the appearance of the three men, whom he obviously sees as being representatives of The L-rd, is both courageous and reverential. Imagine getting up to run in the 45 degree (Celsius) plus heat of midday only three days after a painful operation on your private parts and then prostrating yourself before your guests, coming to rest on those very same parts in the hot sand. It’s safe to say, Avraham was extremely excited to see The L-rd and His messengers. This action shows the wonderful tension between friendship and awe in his relating to the Holy G-d. Avraham runs toward G-d and His messengers like a giddy school girl and then prostrates himself, an awe inspired servant.
 
It has been popular in Christian circles to try and affix the doctrine of the trinity to this meeting. However, it is clear from the remainder of this account (v.22) and the subsequent arrival of the two messengers at Sodom in 19:1, that at least two of the three men are not G-d.
 
Or HaChaim (Light of Life) suggests that G-d’s visit to Avraham in this instance was intended to demonstrate that Avraham had become a, “Chariot of the Divine Presence” (Bereshit Rabbah 82:6), meaning that Avraham’s physical being became a resting place for the Divine Presence of G-d (John 14:16-18; Romans 8:10, 15; James 4:5).
 
“I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Helper so He may be with you forever-- the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it does not behold Him or know Him. You know Him, because He abides with you and will be in you. I will not abandon you as orphans; I will come to you.” –Yochanan (John) 14:16-18
 
“Or do you think that in vain the Scripture says, ‘He yearns jealously over the Spirit which He made to dwell in us’”? –Yaakov (James) 4:5
 
Traditional rabbinic Judaism considers each of G-d’s angels to serve a specific purpose. Thus each angel (Messenger) is named for his function. The Midrash says, “One angel does not perform two missions”. Gur Aryeh explains Rashi’s view of the three angels, by providing the following names and functions:
 

1. Michael (Who is like G-d) – Function: Proclaims a miracle, informing Avraham that the all sufficient G-d will give Sarah a Son
2. Gavriel (Mighty one of G-d) – Function: Enacting Judgement, overturning Sodom (19:25)
3. Raphael (Healing of G-d) – Function: To Bring Wholeness. He is said to have healed Avraham of his circumcision wound and delivered Lot from Sodom, the two acts being part of making Avraham’s household whole, a single mission of rescue.

 
My personal view is that if we are to accept Rashi/Gur Aryeh’s view, we should swap the functions and order of the Malakhim (Angels) so as to match them to their well-documented Biblical roles and functions. Thus my list would read as follows:
 

1. Gavriel (Mighty one of G-d) – Function: Proclaims a miracle, informing Avraham that the all sufficient G-d will give Sarah a Son
2. Michael (Who is like G-d) – Function: Guardian of Israel, enacting Judgement, overturning Sodom (19:25)
3. Yeshua [Raphael] (Healing of G-d) – Function: To Bring Wholeness. He is said to have healed Avraham of his circumcision wound and delivered Lot from Sodom, the two acts being part of making Avraham’s household whole, a single mission of rescue.

 
Given that we know two of the men (angels) will depart for Sodom (19:1) leaving one angel to remain behind, and adding to this the fact that Avraham speaks to the remaining lord as if he were speaking directly to HaShem; it seems unlikely that the third angel was Raphael (an angel not mentioned directly in Scripture). However, the name Raphael, which is a composite of Rapha (Healing, wholeness, and rescue) and El (G-d), is certainly symbolic of the attribute of healing and wholeness in the G-d head. There is then a healing messenger of G-d Who comes to mind, being represented here as one of the three men, that is Yeshua our Messiah.
 
It is important to note that the Hebrew anashim meaning men is being used here to describe angelic beings. This is an opportunity to remind ourselves that the Hebrew malakh (angel) means, messenger.
 
Gen 18:3 And said, “My L-rd (Adonai: Master), if now I have found favour in Your eyes, please, don’t pass away from your servant:
 
Most rabbinical interpretations of this verse claim that the Hebrew Adonai used here in its standard form refers to YHVH, which is usually pronounced Adonai in respect for the Holy Name HaShem. Based on this view, HaShem: YHVH:Mercy, is referred to directly 12 times in total during this account.
 
Notice that Avraham rushes out to the three men but addresses only one of them, using the singular, “Adonai” (My lord). If he had intended to address all three as lord he would have said “Adonim”.
 
Gen 18:4 Please let a little water be fetched, and wash your feet, and rest yourselves under the tree:
 
The washing of the feet of weary travellers is a common Middle Eastern custom that has been practised by Jews and Arabs alike for thousands of years. It refreshes the entire body and in ancient times was usually performed by the lowliest servant in the household, however, it seems that Avraham’s intention was to wash the feet of the travellers himself, an act reminiscent of the Mashiyach (John 13:3-17).
 
Gen 18:5 And I’ll fetch a morsel of bread, and comfort your hearts; after that go on your way: for it is for this purpose that you’ve come to your servant”. And they said, “So do, as you have said”.
 
“I’ll fetch a morsel of bread” is a hospitable understatement given the feast that Avraham organizes for the three men. This is part of a rhythm of nomadic custom that is still practised today among Arab Bedouin and Mizrahi Jews. The Hebrew idiom, “comfort your hearts” uses lev in the traditional Hebrew sense to convey the centre of the being where all parts of the being converge. Thus the inference is that they might be refreshed in their entire being based on the complete performance of hospitable practice.
 
Notice that, “they” respond. This kind of interchangeable tense is familiar to theophany, as is the case in Jacob’s wrestling with the Angel of Hashem (Gen. 32) and the meeting the Angel of HaShem has with the parents of Samson (Judges 13). We must not lose sight of the fact that we have significant clues within the text (v.22, 19:1) that allow us to deduct which of the three is being called lord and who the remaining two are.
 
Michael (Who is like G-d) is known in Scripture as the arch angel who guards Israel and is representative of G-d’s might. He is a warrior messenger (Daniel 10:13, 21; 12:1, Jude 1:9, Rev. 12:7). It seems that he plays a similar role here (Chapter. 19) in protecting Lot, while Gavriel (Mighty one of G-d), who is known in Scripture as a herald of G-d (Daniel 8:16; 9:21, Luke 1:19, 26) is seen here proclaiming blessing for Avraham and then enforcing G-d’s judgement against the people of S’dom and Amorrah. Notice that in the book of Daniel both angels are associated with G-d’s proclamation of blessing for Israel and His judgement against His enemies.
 
Gen 18:6 And Avraham (Father of a Multitude) hastened into the tent to Sarah (Princess, Noble woman), and said, “Make ready quickly three measures of fine meal, knead it, and make round bread upon the hearth (convex metal surface)”.
 
The first thing we observe is the speed with which Avraham operates in order to care for his guests. Second, we see that Avraham does not instruct Sarah to add yeast to the bread, therefore, this is maztot (unleavened bread). It is from this verse and the subsequent reference in 19:3 that the rabbis’ determine that this was the season of Pesach (Passover) and that Avraham was prophetically observing the future deliverance of his progeny. This text was written down by Moses at Sinai following Israel’s first Pesach. Thus the attention to detail with regard to the type of bread being prepared in this story is intended by the author to draw the reader’s attention to this particular season in the Jewish religious year.
 
The three men, three measures of fine meal and the three days since Avraham’s circumcision all point to an established promise of G-d. The son that is to come has been firmly established and as has the judgement that is to come against the wickedness of S’dom and Amorrah. While the complex unity of G-d is not present in the plain meaning of the text, it is revealed in the remez (hint) of symbolic Biblical numerology. The number three reminding us of the Father (Av), Son (Ben) and Holy Spirit (Ruach Ha-Kodesh).
 
Gen 18:7 And Avraham ran to the herd, and fetched a calf tender and good, and gave it to a young man; and he rushed to prepare it.
 
Avraham is close to 100 years old and still recovering from circumcision, and yet he personally runs to select a calf for his guests. He had any number of servants he could have called upon to perform this act, however, these three men were extremely important to him. In particular, one of the men is G-d with us, the manifest humanoid form of that person of the One G-d we know to be, the Angel of HaShem, The Healer, the Son.
 
“Do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers—for in doing so, some have entertained angels (Messengers) without knowing it.” –Hebrews 13:2
 
“For I was hungry and you gave Me something to eat; I was thirsty and you gave Me something to drink; I was a stranger and you invited Me in;” –Mattitiyahu (Matthew) 25:35 (TLV)
 
Gen 18:8 And he took butter, and milk, and the calf which he had prepared, and set it before them; and he stood by them under the trees, and they ate.
 
The custom of standing by while guests eat their fill is still practiced today in many Middle Eastern homes and among the Arab Bedouin and Mizrahi Jews.
 
They were eating beneath the trees of Mamrei (strength). The strength of G-d had formed a canopy over Avraham in his weakness and his longing for an heir. In his weakness Avraham placed his trust in G-d’s strength.
 
Gen 18:9 And they said to him, “Where is Sarah your wife?” And he said, “Behold, in the tent.”
 
Here, “they” speak, asking after Sarah. However, in the following verse, “He” speaks the promise. G-d knows where Sarah is, He need not ask. He asks, all be it through His Angel, in order to show Avraham His desire for relationship with the entire household, beginning with Sarah.
 
Gen 18:10 And He said, “I will certainly return to you according to the time of life (season); and, behold, Sarah your wife shall have a son.” And Sarah heard from inside the tent door, which was behind him.
 
The, “He” here is clearly not Avraham because the words are being spoken as a promise to Avraham concerning his wife Sarah and the birth of Isaac. Nor is it, “they” speaking together. So who is left? HaShem appeared to Avraham at the beginning of the encounter and has not left. So too the three men arrived and have not left. Therefore the speaker here is one of the three men and is also a manifestation of the person of G-d (18:14). Only one individual in all of Biblical history fits this description, Yeshua the Messiah, Emmanuel (G-d with us).
 
Sarah, being modest, had stayed within the tent according to protocol, but was listening intently to the conversation of the men outside. The man speaking to Avraham has His back to Sarah.
 
Gen 18:11 Now Avraham and Sarah were old and well stricken in age; and it ceased to be with Sarah after the manner of women (She had already experienced menopause).
Gen 18:12 Therefore Sarah laughed within herself, saying, “After I am waxed old shall I have fine skin (a return of fertility), my lord (husband) being old also?”
 
What is clear from Sarah’s response is that either Avraham hadn’t told her of the promise of the child or he had told her and she had maintained disbelief. Either way she responds here in a way that emphasizes her doubt, laughing out of a place of mistrust. Where Avraham laughed in joyous awe asking, “How will this occur?” thus inviting the probability, Sarah laughs in disbelief asking, “Shall it occur?” thus denying the possibility. Notice that Sarah laughs within, her words are thoughts contained in her inner being, no one could have known how she responded unless they could see into her core being. Only G-d is truly capable of this. Picture then the awesome scene that follows when the man responds to Sarah’s inner musings.
 
According to both Radak and Sforno, Sarah believed that such a radical rejuvenation was as impossible a miracle as the raising of the dead. This is interesting given the fact that Isaac, who is later to be offered by Avraham in sacrifice and then saved by the Ram (A type for Messiah: Genesis 22), is spoken of in the book of Hebrews in relationship to trust in the Messiah Yeshua, Who was raised from the dead for our redemption.
 
“He (Avraham) reasoned that God was able to raise him (Isaac) up even from the dead—and in a sense, he did receive him back from the dead.” –Hebrews 11:19
 
Gen 18:13 And HaShem (YHVH: Mercy) said to Avraham, “Why did Sarah laugh, saying, ‘Shall I be certain that I’ll bear a child, when I’m old’?”
Gen 18:14 Is anything too hard for HaShem (YHVH: Mercy)? At the time appointed I will return unto you, according to the time of life (season), and Sarah shall have a son.
 
Avraham is perhaps thinking, “What laughter? I didn’t hear her laugh or say anything?” In turn Sarah is probably thinking, “How is it possible that this man knows my inner thoughts?”
 
We note here that it is HaShem who has heard Sarah and that it is He Who will return in a year’s time at this season (Pesach) to witness the birth of the son.
 
With the words, “Is anything too hard for HaShem” G-d challenges Sarah’s unbelief (mistrust).
 
 Gen 18:15 Then Sarah denied it, saying, “I didn’t laugh”; for she was afraid. And He said, “Not so; you did laugh.”
 
Sarah, now caught in her disbelief and being fearful of G-d, choses to lie rather than confess. However, G-d, Who is present in mercy (YHVH), disciplines Sarah as a beloved child, refuting her lie with the simple statement, “Not so; you did laugh”. Here, “laugh” is synonymous with, “doubt”. Therefore, we can read, “Not so; you did doubt”.
 
Remember that up to this point the man (G-d with us) has had His back turned to Sarah, now He turns to look her in the eye and gently challenge her unbelief.
 
We know that Sarah took HaShem’s challenge to heart because she eventually found trust in HaShem, and considering Him trustworthy, believed she would give birth to the promised child.
 
“By trust even Sarah herself received ability to conceive when she was barren and past the age, since she considered the One who had made the promise to be trustworthy.” – Hebrews 11:11
 
It is also worth noting here the similarities between the birth of Isaac and the later birth of the Messiah. The Ram which delivers Isaac in Genesis 22 is a type for the Messiah and his sacrificial death and His resurrection. Thus, when we see the proclamation to Sarah, we also hear the proclamation to Miriyam (Mary). When we hear of the miraculous birth that is to take place, we’re also reminded of the miraculous birth of our Messiah. When we see the two angels that accompany G-d with us (Emmanuel: the third man), we also think of the angel that visited Miriyam (Mary) and the angel who brought a legion of angels to announce the Messiah’s birth to the shepherds of Israel’s sacrificial flocks.
 
Gen 18:16 And the men rose up from there, and turned their faces toward S’dom (burning): and Avraham walked with them on the way.
 
We know that two of the three men arrived in S’dom, named as messengers (malakhim: angels) 19:1.
 
It seems that Avraham, went with the men for part of their journey as they began to head toward S’dom.
 
Gen 18:17 And HaShem (YHVH: Mercy) said, “Shall I hide from Avraham the thing which I am doing; Gen 18:18 seeing that Avraham shall surely become a great and mighty nation, and all the nations of the earth shall be blessed in him? Gen 18:19 For I know him, that he will command his children and his household after him, and they shall keep the way of HaShem (YHVH: Mercy), to do justice and judgment; that HaShem (YHVH: Mercy) may bring upon Avraham that which He has spoken of him.”
 
This conversation seems to be taking place between HaShem and the men (angels). Given our former deduction regarding Who the third man is, we can suggest that G-d with us (Yeshua), the third man, is conversing with Michael and Gavriel. These two angels already know what G-d has instructed them to do in S’dom, thus, for the reader’s sake the text alludes to a sort of legal tribunal being conducted in line with the attributes of mercy, justice and judgement, which are the attributes G-d is trusting Avraham to pass on to his offspring. This therefore is the reason for the consultation and the subsequent opportunity for Avraham to offer a righteous argument for the consolation of justice and mercy. Not because G-d is unjust or unmerciful but because G-d has imparted His attributes to Avraham a heart of mercy and justice which will be a light to the nations.
 
“Shall I hide” infers a friendship between G-d and Avraham (Isaiah 41:8). Yeshua illuminates the relationship between G-d and His servants when He says:
 
“I am no longer calling you servants, for the servant does not know what his master is doing. Now I have called you friends, because everything I have heard from My Father I have made known to you.” –Yochanan (John) 15:15 (TLV)
 
This friendship is further emphasized by the phrase, “I know him” the Hebrew, “yada” denoting intimate knowledge of a person. In this case it is a knowledge that transcends time and space, an observation of the present eternity spoken into time and space in this conversation between G-d and the angels. In other words, G-d has already seen Avraham’s future righteousness and is speaking it into time and space.
 
Gen 18:20 And HaShem (YHVH: Mercy) said, “Because the cry of S’dom (Burning) and Amorrah (Submersion) is great, and because their sin is very grievous;
 
Ibn Ezra notes that the, “Outcry” is either the outcry of the rebellion of the Sodomites or the outcry of those who had suffered as a result of the evil conduct of the Sodomites. Rambam claims that it is the cry of the oppressed looking for liberation.
 
The opinion of the Jewish sages is that the cruelty of S’dom stemmed from the maxim, “What is mine is mine and what is yours is yours” (Avot 5:10). A similar modern idiom says, “Neither a borrower or a lender be”. Both colloquialisms offer the pretence inherent in worldly wisdom but directly oppose the charitable mission of G-d’s people.
 
Gen 18:21 I will descend, and inspect what they have done according to the outcry, which is come unto me; and if not, I will know (I will be known).”
 
“I will descend” is for the sake of the human audience. G-d uses kinetic terms to convey a sense of His present action within time and space, however, He remains invisible and immutable, existing outside of all things, the eternal G-d.
 
G-d, within Whom all things exist and have their being, need not descend. Additionally, G-d with us (Emmanuel), the angel, will descend. The inspection of S’dom is intended to emphasize the judicial nature of this judgement. S’dom is being given a just and fair trial, her destruction will not be without merit.
 
The phrase, “And if not, I will know (yada)” may mean, “If they repent, I will know (yada) them” or, “I will be known by them”.
 
Gen 18:22 And the men turned their faces from there, and went toward S’dom: but Avraham remained standing before HaShem (YHVH: Mercy).
 
The present reading of verse 22 is according to the Masoretic scribal correction of the text. Possibly intended to avoid conjecture over the position of Avraham in relation to G-d. However, there is a good case for reading the original Hebrew as, “but HaShem remained standing before Avraham”. This reading qualifies the former correlation between the manifestation of G-d in humanoid form and the third man (angel). Regardless, only two men (angels) arrive at S’dom (19:1), leaving the third to remain. Thus it is the L-rd with us (Emmanuel) as the man (angel) Who remains standing before Avraham, or if you like, before Whom Avraham stands.
 
Gen 18:23 And Avraham drew near (nagash: an intimate closeness), and said, “Will You also destroy the righteous with the wicked?”
  
Avraham now draws near, an intimate positioning of himself close to the third man, face to face. This is the intense relational context of the conversation that follows.
 
In the previous chapter Avraham had received his new name and had become the Father of the nations. He takes this role seriously by drawing near to G-d as an intermediary on behalf of the people of S’dom and the surrounding cities who will be destroyed by the ensuing destruction brought about by G-d’s righteous judgement. G-d has placed in him the desire to see justice tempered with mercy. Thus the G-d of mercy is seen at work within the heart of His servant.
 
Avraham had intervened on S’dom’s behalf in the past (Genesis 14:14) for the sake of his nephew Lot. His continued concern and deep connection to his nephew can be heard in his pleading for mercy.
 
Gen 18:24 “What if there were fifty righteous within the midst of the terror (the city): will You also destroy and not spare the place for the fifty righteous that are there?

“So it was, as God destroyed the cities of the surrounding area, that God remembered Abraham, and sent Lot out of the midst of the upheaval, when He demolished the cities where Lot had dwelt.” –Bereishit (Genesis) 19:29 (TLV)
 
Based on Genesis 19:29 Rashi suggests that all five of the cities mentioned in Genesis 14:2 are to be condemned in the judgement against S’dom. Thus the plea for the holding back of judgement on account of 50 righteous ones is in fact a plea for 10 (a quorum for worship/prayer—minion) from each of the five condemned cities. This infers that the number of righteous is related to the potential for their faithful worship of G-d, to have a redemptive effect upon those around them and thus cause the cities to repent and turn away from evil. This is consistent with the continual use of the Holy Name YHVH: mercy, throughout the chapter.
 
Gen 18:25 That be far from You to do after this manner, to slay the righteous with the wicked: and that the righteous should be as the wicked, that be far from You: Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right?”
 
Simply put Avraham is saying, “It is not in Your Character to punish the righteous with the wicked”. In other words, “that be far from You” means, “It’s not Who You are”. Additionally, “Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right?” is rhetorical and best understood to mean, “I know that the Judge of the earth will do what is right”.
 
Gen 18:26 And HaShem (YHVH: Mercy) said, “If I find in S’dom fifty righteous within the city, then I will spare all the place for their sakes.”
 
The key phrase here is, “within the city” which means inside the walls, in the midst of the evil behaviour.
 
Gen 18:27 And Avraham answered and said, “Behold now, I have taken it upon myself to speak unto HaShem (YHVH: Mercy), although I am but dust and ashes: Gen 18:28 If there are five less than fifty righteous: will You destroy all the city for lack of five? And He said, “If I find there forty five, I will not destroy it.”
 
Notice the humility and respect Avraham pays to G-d as he continues to petition Him for mercy. Given the inference in the Holy Name we could read, “I have taken it upon myself to speak unto Mercy”. Rashi notes according to the Midrash that even with five subtracted from the number of the righteous each city would still have nine and G-d would become the tenth member of the quorum for worship and prayer.
 
Gen 18:29 And he spoke to Him yet again, and said, “ If there are forty found there?” And He said, “I will not do it for forty's sake.” Gen 18:30 And he said unto him, “Oh let not my Lord (Adonai) be angry, and I will speak: if there are thirty found there?” And He said, “I will not do it, if I find thirty there.” Gen 18:31 And he said, “Behold now, I have taken upon me to speak unto my Lord (Adonai): If there were twenty found there?” And He said, “I will not destroy it for twenty's sake.” Gen 18:32 And he said, “Oh let not my Lord (Adonai) be angry, and I will speak but once more: if ten are found there?” And He said, “I will not destroy it for ten's sake.
 
We might be tempted to see this dialogue as some sort of haggling over the judgement of the people of S’dom, however, that is not what’s happening. This dialogue between Avraham the advocate and G-d the Merciful Judge is intended to express G-d’s desire to see all come to a saving knowledge of Him (1 Timothy 2:3-5). Avraham is acting as a type for the then future coming of the Messiah, the greatest advocate of all time. One of the key evidences for this being a conversation of friendship, or of Teacher and disciple, is the fact that G-d does not respond with a counter to Avraham’s requests, He simply concedes to each of Avraham’s demands until at last Avraham learns that G-d has shown great mercy already and that the refusal of the wicked to accept G-d’s mercy is the vehicle of their own demise.
 
The petitioning for mercy ends at the number 10, the number for a single complete quorum of worship and prayer or alternatively, 2 people in each of the five condemned cities grouped together with S’dom and Amorrah. It is interesting to note that Yeshua seems to have used the traditional rabbinical requirement for a quorum of ten as a platform for conveying the reality that G-d is present and active even when two are gathered in His Name (Matthew 18:20).
 
Gen 18:33 And HaShem (YHVH: Mercy) went His way (departed), as soon as he had finished communing with Avraham: and Avraham returned unto his place.
 
G-d didn’t leave until Avraham had finished petitioning Him. This, in and of itself is a clear representation of G-d’s merciful character. Because G-d is everywhere in the sense that all things are in Him, He cannot leave or depart from Himself. However, as explained previously, in order for human beings to read relational interaction in this encounter, kinetic language must be used to convey the tangible sense of relationship that Avraham experienced with G-d. Additionally, the third man still had to depart and did not arrive at S’dom in 19:1, therefore G-d with us (Yeshua), the man (angel), departed.
 
Avraham returned to his place because he had previously left with the three men toward S’dom and then stopped at a point on the way where he continued to speak with G-d while the two angels (Michael and Gavriel) went to S’dom. He now returned to his tents at the trees of Mamrei.
 
My daughter’s teachers ask them to put what they term a, “hook” in their essay writing. A repeated phrase, an idea that reconciles each element of the essay. If there is a hook in this theophany, it is this, “Mercy triumphs over judgement”.
 
“So speak and act as those who will be judged according to a Torah that gives freedom. For judgment is merciless to the one who does not show mercy. Mercy triumphs over judgment.” –Yaakov (James) 2:12-13 (TLV)
  
© Yaakov brown 2016