Introduction:
 
Yeshua was introduced as Kohen HaGadol at 2:17 and the writer of Hebrews has explained Yeshua’s role in likeness to that of Melkiy Tzedek the ancient priest of Salem in a drash (comparative teaching) begun in chapter 4 and expanded in chapter 5. In preparation for further explanation regarding the priesthood of Messiah as it relates to the priesthood of Melkiy Tzedek, the writer now continues this exposition of Psalms 110:4 (Heb. 4:14-7:28) in chapter 6, first with a warning against experiential faith and then explaining God’s immutably reliable promise and oath to Abraham as an example of His trustworthiness in relationship to salvation through Yeshua the Great High Priest of an everlasting atonement.
 
It’s important to understand that what is taught in this chapter regarding those who have experienced the gifts of God’s redemptive purpose and even partnered with the Holy Spirit, but have nonetheless failed to enter regenerative faith (are not true disciples) in Yeshua, is taught as a warning and not as a foregone conclusion.
 
As is the case with all Scripture (scrolls of the original texts), there are no chapter breaks or verse markers (or punctuation for that matter) in the scroll of the Book to the Hebrews. It’s important to see the text of this chapter as a continuation of the previous chapter, the last verses of chapter 5 being:
 
13 For everyone individually and collectively who partakes of milk is unskilful, inexperienced, ignorant, has no knowledge in the word, essence of righteousness, for that one is an infant. [cf. Isa. 7:15; re. Messiah to the contrary: His spiritual maturity exceeded His physical growth] 14 But strong food, oiled bread [fat bread] is for the mature, who by reason have their senses, perception vigorously trained, exercised, their hearts, core being, inner person, examined to distinguish, discern between good and evil.
 
BOOK TO THE HEBREWS Chapter 6 (Author’s translation)
 
1Therefore, upon what’s been said, leaving, turning from the beginning, cornerstones, foundation stones of the word, essences, instructions of the Messiah, let us bring, go up to maturity, not laying, returning again (to) a foundation of repentance, turning around, change of mind, from dead corpse-like works and of faith, belief, assurance, trust toward, on God, 
2 of instructions, doctrines, taught things about immersions, washings, baptisms and laying on of hands, and about the resurrection of the dead and judgment, damnation, condemnation everlasting, in perpetual world. 
3 And this we will do, if God allows, permits, gives licence.
4 For it is impotent, weak in the case of those who have once been enlightened, illuminated, seen the light [alt. have already lifted up their eyes to the light: alt. #2 have descended to immersion[A]], and have tasted, eaten of the heavenly gift and have been made partakers, partners of the Holy Spirit, 
5 and have tasted, eaten the good breathed word of God and the powers, miracles of the world to come,
6 If they also then fall away, to renew them again to repentance, returning, because they again crucify to themselves the Son of God and put Him to public shame. 
7 For the land that drinks the rain which often falls on it, and produces herbs/vegetation of good seed useful to those who farm it, receives a spoken blessing from God;
8 but if it bears thorns and thistles, it is castaway, worthless, rejected and very close to being cursed, and its end is in being burned.
9 But now, dear ones/beloved, we are persuaded, convinced, trusting of better things regarding you, and things possessed in salvation, even though we must speak in this way.
10 For God is not unjust, unrighteous so as to forget your work and labour of charitable holistic love which you have shown toward His Name, in that you have served, ministered to the holy [set apart] ones and continue to serve today. 
11 And we desire that every one of you show the same diligence, forwardness, urgency so as to realize the full confidence of faith, trust, hope until the goal,
12 so that you will not be dull, stupid, sluggish, lazy but followers, imitators, walking in the way of those who through faith, belief, assurance, fidelity, trust and patience, endurance, perseverance, in their spirit inherit the promises.
13 For when God made a promise to Avraham, since He could swear an oath by no one greater, He swore by Himself, on His own soul,
14 saying, “indeed, for blessing I will bless you and multiplying I will multiply you [your seed/progeny].” [ Gen. 22:17] 
15 And so, having patiently waited in his spirit, he obtained the promise. 
16 For indeed people swear an oath by one greater, and taking an oath serves as confirmation to them, an end of all strife, dispute, contradiction between them.
17 In the same way God, desiring more abundantly to demonstrate to the heirs of the promise the fact that His purpose is immutable, unchangeable, confirmed it with an oath, 
18 so that by two immutable, unchangeable things in which it is impossible for God to lie, we might have strong comfort who have fled for refuge to take hold of the hope set before us.
19 This hope we have as an anchor of the soul, a hope both certain, loyal and forceful, reliable and one which enters into the house the parochet inner veil [the veil hung before the holy of holies], 
20 where Yeshua has entered as a forerunner for us, having become a high priest forever according to the word, order, type, style, arrangement of Melkiy Tzedek.
 
HEBREWS 6 (line upon line)
 
1Therefore, upon what’s been said (al kein[H]) leaving, turning from (aphiēmi[G], mei’avneiy pinah[H]) the beginning, cornerstones, foundation stones (arche[G]) of the word, essences, instructions (logos[G], davar[H], alt. betorat[H]) of the Messiah (Christos[G], ha-Mashiyach[H]), let us bring, go up (pherō̄[G], vena’aleh[H]) to maturity (teleiotēs[G], ad-tachliyta[H]), not (velo[H]) laying, returning (kataballō[G], nashuv[H]) again (to) a foundation (themelios[G], et-hatsod[H]) of repentance, turning around, change of mind (metanoia[G], liteshuvah[H]), from dead corpse-like (nekros[G]) works (ergon[G], min-ma’asiym asher mavet[H]) and of faith, belief, assurance, trust (pistis[G], emunat[H]) toward, on (epi[G]) God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]), 2 of instructions, doctrines, taught things (didachē[G], diyn[H]) about immersions, washings, baptisms (baptismos[G], hateviylot[H]) and laying on (epithesis[G], smiychat[H]) of hands (cheir[G], yadayim[H]), and about the resurrection (anastasis[G], utekumat[H]) of the dead (nekros[G], hameitiym[H]) and judgment, damnation, condemnation (krima[G], umishpat[H]) everlasting, in perpetual world (aiōnios[G], olam[H]). 3 And this we will do, if God allows, permits, gives, licences (Theos epitrepō[G], birtzot haEl[H]).
 
Within the first two verses of this chapter, six foundational doctrines are alluded to:
 
1.Repentance – turning away from sin and toward God
2.Faith in God – the receipt of God and His sacrificial love in Yeshua by grace
3.Immersions – full immersion in the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, the consecration of the body of believers, individually and corporately as priests under the Great High Priest Yeshua
4.Laying on of hands – the conferring and imparting of authority in Messiah, of God
5.Resurrection of the dead – the resurrection of all who have passed at the end of the present sin affected world/age
6.Eternal Judgement/Punishment – the destiny of all who refuse God’s offer of redemptive, vicarious, sacrificial love
 
The foundational doctrines of our faith community, which are for both Jewish believers and are given via Jewish believers to Gentiles (so that all believers have access to them), are established not in the writings of so called Gentile “Church Fathers”, but in the writings of the true fathers of the body of believers (Jews), appointed by God and inspired by the Holy Spirit.
 
We do not base our core beliefs and doctrines on the Nicene creeds of Christendom but on the Scriptures (Genesis to Revelation).
 
As I have stated many times, prior to the Hellenization of the known world (323-33 B.C.E) there was no word in the Hebrew language for “theology”. In short, Biblical Judaism teaches faith in action, it is not creedal but functional (to our shame as Jews, post temple Rabbinical Judaism eventually developed into a creedal religion in a polemic attempt to stem the influence of Christianity).
 
1Therefore, upon what’s been said, leaving, turning from the beginning, cornerstones, foundation stones of the word, essences, instructions of the Messiah, let us bring, go up to maturity, not laying, returning again (to) a foundation of repentance, turning around, change of mind, from dead corpse-like works and of faith, belief, assurance, trust toward, on God,
 
This verse sets up the context for the subsequent verses of admonishment regarding experiential faith (v.4 – 8). The writer is essentially saying that there is no need for someone who has genuinely received Yeshua and is living according to repentance to return to a fundamental understanding of salvation because that person already has the understanding required to form a foundation for maturity.
 
“Therefore” Because the ability to distinguish between good and evil requires a believer to walk in the discipline of maturity (5:13-14).
 
“leaving foundational instruction of the Messiah” Moving forward, not leaving behind. Note that it is, teaching concerning the Messiah that is at the heart of maturity. Therefore, the milk is important, and a beginning, but must be added to with strong food unto maturity.
 
“let us go up” Is from the Hebrew translation and denotes making Aliyah, going up to Jerusalem for one of the regaliym (three aliyot, or going up moediym appointed times/festivals: Pesach, Shavuot, and Sukkot)[The three “P”s: Passover, Pentecost and Pup-tents]. In short, rather than returning to a base understanding of what it means to be part of the believing community, let’s instead celebrate the festivals of the mature, delighting in the learning gleaned from a rhythm of righteous action set out and fuelled by God for our good.
 
“not laying again a foundation of repentance” If we have truly repented and are walking in repentance, what need do we have of repenting? Except if we are not truly saved. Therefore, the writer is speaking a warning to those among the believing Jewish community who walk in pretentious experiential faith (some being self-deluded and in need of a wakeup call, others wilfully rebellious and in need of the life changing regeneration of Yeshua’s saving work).
 
“and of faith on God” Faith is a living and ongoing relational journey and not a time trapped decision or benign act of mental assent.
 
2 of instructions, doctrines, taught things about immersions, washings, baptisms and laying on of hands, and about the resurrection of the dead and judgment, damnation, condemnation everlasting, in perpetual world.
 
“Immersions, washings” This refers to the ritual washing of tevilah ba’mikveh (immersion in the ritual washing pool or other living water source), the washing of priests through ritual consecration in preparation for offerings made before the face of God, the immersion of Yochanan the Immerser (John the Baptist), the immersion of Yeshua’s disciples, the immersion of the Holy Spirit, which began at Shavuot[H] (Pentecost[G]), and the trifold immersion commanded by Yeshua, which unites all immersions from the mikveh (gathering of waters) at creation, to the mikveh of Noah (saved through the flood waters), to the mikveh of the Red Sea (Israel’s immersion unto freedom), to the mikveh of the Jordan (Israel’s immersion unto the promised land: a shadow of the eternal land), to all the aforementioned mikvot and unto the fullness of their prophetic goal in Messiah’s life, death and resurrection.
 
The fullness of Yeshua’s mikvot (immersions, washings) are understood as foundational to true faith. Therefore, the mikveh (immersion) of Yeshua incorporates all immersions and consecrates the believer as a priest under Yeshua immersed in the Godhead (1 Peter 2:9 [note that in the context of 1 Peter 2:9 Peter is speaking to Jewish believers, just as the writer of the book to the Hebrews is here]).
 
“Laying on of hands” is a Hebraic (Jewish) idiom that denotes the appointing or passing on of authority. It is seen in action in relation to immersion and the gift of the Holy Spirit (Acts 8:16-17; 19:5-6), where the laying of hands is symbolic, while the Spirit is given of God. It is important to note that the one who lays hands is not giving the gift of the Holy Spirit (a blasphemous notion) but that the laying of hands is a symbol of the conferring of authority. Thus, a child of God is given the Holy Spirit as a sign of authority in Messiah unto God.
 
Laying on of hands is seen in the commissioning and ordaining of kingdom workers (Acts 6:6; 13:3; 1 Tim. 4:14; 5:22; 2 Tim. 1:6), in the healing of the sick (Mk. 6:5; 16:18; Lk. 4:40; Acts 28:8), and in the imparting of blessing (Matt. 19:13-15). On all of these occasions the conferring or imparting of authority is the primary meaning, which is then outworked by the power of God in the life of the believer.
 
“resurrection of the dead” Yeshua, the Perushiym (Pharisees) [Mishnah Sot. 9:15; Mishnah San. 10:1], and the first century Messianic Jews all accepted the resurrection of the dead at the end of the age unto judgement, as foundational doctrine. There is no need to relearn immutable things. They are firmly established.
 
“judgement/punishment everlasting” Eternal punishment is not to be questioned. Those who question its reality prove themselves unbelievers and apostate. This is a harsh indictment on the first century Jewish believing community but it is an even harsher indictment on the modern western church, which has become saturated in the false doctrines of “Temporal punishment”, “salvation after death”, “annihilationism” and numerous other satanic lies.
 
Eternal judgement (meaning that the consequences of Gods final judgement are eternal both with regard to life and to death) was a commonly accepted doctrine of Biblical and first century Judaism, and remains so in the true remnant among Messianic Jews (Isa. 66:22-24; Ezek. 34:17-22; Dan. 7:26; 12:1-2; Ezra. 7:33-44; Matt. 218:6-9; 5:31-46; Mark. 9:42-48; Rom. 2:7; 2 Thess. 1:5-10; Jude 7; 13; Rev. 14:9-11; 20:10, 14-15).
 
Eternal punishment is not the same as the temporal punishment of Gehenna (Mishnah Qidd. 14:4; Mishnah Ed. 2:10; Mishnah Avot 1:5; 5:19-20). Gehenna is that part of sheol (holding place of the departed) where the wicked await the final resurrection and judgement, after which they are thrown into the lake of perpetual fire prepared for the Devil and his angels (Rev. 20:10, 14-15). The confusion many have with regard to eternal punishment is based on a misunderstanding between temporal punishment (Gehenna) and eternal punishment (lake of fire), both of which are taught in Scripture, the latter being the ultimate destination of the unsaved.
 
3 And this we will do, if God allows, permits, gives licence.
 
Our maturity is entirely reliant on God. We receive it and in His strength walk in it. Immaturity is the product of both the misbelief that we can earn God’s favour, and its counterpart, the misbelief that we have no need of God’s favour. Both are idolatry.
 
What Verses 4 to 6 Teach:
 
Verses 4 to 6 are often used in support of the false idea that one can lose salvation. That is not the case. If it were, salvation, reliant on Yeshua, would be unreliable, thus impugning God’s character. In fact, what verses 4 to 6 teach, is that experiential faith is not true faith. That those who may have appeared to have been true disciples can at times be proven to be pretenders (knowingly or unknowingly [self-deluded]). The warning of these verses is subsequent to and based on the warning connected to the disbelieving generation of Israelites alluded to in Hebrews 3:7- 4:13. It is a warning to those who profess faith but whose apostacy proves they have no such faith (cf. 1 John 2:19).
 
If one has turned against the light he has supposedly received he has convinced himself that the light was false. Anyone, who having met Yeshua the Light of the world can at a later date say that Yeshua is not God with us, has by the evidence of his admission, not received Yeshua, and therefore, has never been a true disciple. In other words, the Light they claim to have received they have never known.
 
Allowing one’s self to be temporarily influenced by faith in Yeshua is not the same as entering an eternal faith relationship in Yeshua. The former attaches faith to a fallen human lifestyle, like a fashion accessory that is purchased to match a certain outfit, and is subsequently tossed away when the outfit is no longer fashionable. The latter submits the human soul to God in Yeshua, recognising His rule over every part of existence.
 
What is clear is that these verses warn any among the body of first century Jewish believers who are not genuine disciples, of the danger facing them if they do not repent and walk in true faith. The cutting off of such apostates reflects the ancient Jewish “karet” (cut off) punishment where certain violations of Torah such as idolatry, incest etc. result in exclusion from the community (Ex. 12:15, 19; Lev. 18:29; 20:3; 23:29).
 
There is a similar halakhah taught by Rav Shaul and based on the Torah is conveyed to all believers, with regard to the incestuous sexually immoral brother:
 
“Cut off the evil person from among yourselves!” -1 Corinthians 5:13 (Deut. 13:5; 17:7; 19:19; 21:21; 22:21,24; 24:7)
 
Rav Shaul speaks in a similar way in his first letter to Timothy:
 
“19 holding on to faith and a good conscience, which some have rejected and so have suffered shipwreck with regard to the faith. 20 Among them are Hymenaeus and Alexander, whom I have handed over to Satan to be taught not to blaspheme.” -1 Timothy 1:19-20
 
In the case of the Messianic community “karet” is intended to produce suffering unto repentance. “The Lord disciplines the ones He loves” (Psa. 94:12, 118:18; Prov. 3:12; Jer. 30:11, 46:28; Heb. 12:6).
 
4 For it is impotent, weak (adunatos[G]) in the case of those who have once been enlightened, illuminated, seen the light [alt. have already lifted up their eyes to the light: alt. #2 have descended to immersion[A]] (phōtizō[G], oru eiyneiyhem[H]), and have tasted, eaten (geuomai[G]) of the heavenly (ho epouranios[G], shamayim[H]) gift (dōrea[G], matan[H]) and have been made (ginomai[G]) partakers, partners (metochos[G]) of the Holy (hagios[G]) Spirit (pneuma[G], Ruach HaKodesh[H]), 5 and have tasted, eaten (geuomai[G]) the good (kalos[G], hatov[H]) breathed word (rhema[G], et devar[H]) of God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]) and the powers, miracles (dunamis[G], nifleot[H]) of the world to come (aiōn mellō[G], haolam heatiyd[H]),
 
4 For it is impotent, weak in the case of those who have once been enlightened, illuminated, seen the light [alt. have already lifted up their eyes to the light: alt. #2 have descended to immersion[A]], and have tasted, eaten of the heavenly gift and have been made partakers, partners of the Holy Spirit, 5 and have tasted, eaten the good breathed word of God and the powers, miracles of the world to come,
 
“Impossible” (NASB) is a poor, even misleading translation of the Greek adunatos. In the context of Hebrews 4 through 5, weak, infantile faith is being challenged. Therefore, “weak, impotent” both valid translations, better convey the contextual meaning of adunatos.
 
Notice that those being spoken of have “seen the light, tasted, eaten, partaken, partnered” but have not continued. Nowhere here is it said that these ones have become disciples or appliers of the faith. Nor have their experiences of God caused them to practice faith. In reality this denotes a person who, like those alluded to in the mashal (parable) of the sower, has failed to grow, mature, fruit, and produce progeny (Matthew 13:1–23, Mark 4:1–20, Luke 8:4–15).
 
Hearing, knowing (in an intellectual sense), tasting, consuming, even temporarily partnering with the Holy Spirit, are all experiential things. Even in the case of the Holy Spirit, one can experience His presence and manifest power and still decide not to continue to partner with Him. Feeling the Holy Spirit is not the same as the Holy Spirit indwelling a person. The Tanakh speaks of the Holy Spirit coming upon even faithless people like king Saul.
 
Experiential or emotional faith is of no value in times of trouble, nor does it manifest lasting change. Essentially, the writer of the Book to the Hebrews, inspired by the Holy Spirit, is teaching that experiential faith (as it is manifest in the temporal sin affected world) is not true faith.
 
Any modern believer who has experienced goosebumps at a corporate worship music event and on a separate occasion during a secular rock concert, has the common sense to realise that goosebumps are no more evidence of the Holy Spirit than a man’s physiological response to a woman’s body is evidence of love. Experience may be a part of faith but it is not synonymous with true faith.
 
6 If they also (kai[G]) then fall away (parapiptō[G]), to renew (anakainizō[G]) them again (palin[G]) to repentance, returning (metanoia[G], velashuv[H]), because (kiy[H]) they again crucify (anastauroō[G], hitzliyvu[H]) to themselves the Son of God (uihos Theos[G], Ben Elohiym[H]) and put Him to public shame (paradeigmatizō[G]). 7 For the land (gē[G], ha’aretz[H]) that drinks (pinō[G], hashotah[H]) the rain (huetos[G], et hageshem[H]) which often falls on it, and produces herbs/vegetation (botanē[G]) of good seed (zera tov[H]) useful to those who farm it (geōrgeō[G]), receives (metalambanō[G]) a spoken blessing (eulogia[G], verachah[H]) from God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]);
 
6 If they also then fall away, to renew them again to repentance, returning, because they again crucify to themselves the Son of God and put Him to public shame.
 
It would be wrong to understand the present text as teaching loss of salvation. Note the qualifying phrase “If they also then fall away”, which is a warning and not a forgone conclusion. In reality it is teaching that those who have not repented genuinely in the first place, cannot return to repentance because they have entirely misunderstood what repentance is. By definition, if one needs to return to repentance he has clearly not repented (because true repentance is to turn and continue in the right direction) but considers he has (is self-deluded), how then can he repent (return)?
 
“Because they again crucify to themselves the Son of God” This shows that they did not understand the work of Messiah’s crucifixion in the first place. The crucifixion of Messiah meant Him becoming a sin sacrifice on our behalf, having taken on Himself the sin (past, present and future) of the repentant. To fall away is to prove that our faith was based on nothing more than a shallow understanding, seeded in soil devoid of depth.
 
7 For the land that drinks the rain which often falls on it, and produces herbs/vegetation of good seed useful to those who farm it, receives a spoken blessing from God;
 
Good seed produces good fruit. The rain represents the Word Yeshua, the Gospel, the Holy Spirit. The land represents the hearts of human beings (in the present context specifically Jews). The good seed here is not the Gospel as it is in Yeshua’s parable, rather it represents the truly regenerated Messiah follower.
​
8 but if it bears thorns (akantha[G]) and thistles (tribolos[G]), it is castaway, worthless, rejected (adokimos[G]) and very close (eggus[G]) to being cursed (katara[G]), and its end (telos[G]) is in being burned (kausis[G], l’vaeir[H]). 9 But now (de[G]), dear ones/beloved (agapētos[G], yediydiym[H]), we are persuaded, convinced, trusting (peithō[G]) of better things (kreittōn[G], devariym toviym[H]) regarding (peri[G]) you, and things possessed (echō[G]) in salvation (sōtēria[G], yeshuah[H]), even though we must speak (laleō[G]) in this way (houtō[G]).

8 but if it bears thorns and thistles, it is castaway, worthless, rejected and very close to being cursed, and its end is in being burned.
 
Note that thorns and thistles are of different seed. The point here is that anyone who produces thorns and thistles is proven by their fruit to have never received the seed of faith in Yeshua in the first place. This therefore, does not teach loss of salvation but is proof of a lack of genuine salvation, which is received and walked in rather than agreed to and disregarded.
 
The teaching of these verses identifies those who have had every opportunity to receive salvation through genuine faith but have instead merely pretended (sometimes even deluding themselves) to have entered into true faith. Thus, the seed of the sinful nature has not been replaced by the seed of faith in Messiah.
 
These verses convey the teaching of Messiah:
 
“If anyone does not remain in Me, he is like a branch that is  thrown away and dries up; such branches are picked up and thrown into the fire and burned.” -Yochanan (John) 15:6
 
Notice the qualifying phrase “If anyone does not remain in Me”, which correlates to “if they also then fall away”.
 
9 But now, dear ones/beloved, we are persuaded, convinced, trusting of better things regarding you, and things possessed in salvation, even though we must speak in this way.
 
These words affirm that the writer and those who lead the wider Jewish believing community with him, are aware that the majority among them are faithful disciples and that the warning is needed only for the few who have yet to show true repentance and the fruit of ongoing faith.
 
10 For God (Theos[G], Ha-Elohiym[H]) is not unjust, unrighteous (adikos[G]) so as to forget (epilanthanomai[G], yishkach[H]) your work (ergon[G]) and labour (kopos[G], amal[H]) of charitable holistic love (agapē[G], ahavatchem[H]) which you have shown toward His Name (onoma[G], lishmo[H]), in that you have served, ministered (diakoneō[G]) to the holy [set apart] ones (hagios[G], likdoshayv[H]) and continue to serve today (diakoneō[G], gam hayom[H]). 11 And we desire (epithumeō[G]) that every one of you (hekastos[G], iysh iysh[H]) show (endeiknumi[G]) the same diligence, forwardness, urgency (spoudē[G]) so as to realize the full confidence (plērophoria[G], ne’emanah[H]) of faith, trust, hope (elpis[G], tikvato[H]) until the goal (telos[G], ad haeitz[H]),
 
10 For God is not unjust, unrighteous so as to forget your work and labour of charitable holistic love which you have shown toward His Name, in that you have served, ministered to the holy [set apart] ones and continue to serve today. 
 
God’s nature is described as the foundation of the security of those who in true faith continue to minister in Yeshua. These ones are not those who are rebuked for experiential faith but are those who are true disciples.
 
Notice the meaning of the now entirely misunderstood English word “saints”. Where many modern denominations venerate only certain individuals as “saints” (the greatest offenders being the Roman Catholic Church), Biblical Judaism understands “saints” as kedoshiym (holy, set apart ones). Throughout the Tanakh (OT) the phrase “My holy ones” has always referred to the righteous remnant of Israel (the ethnic descendants of Jacob).
 
11 And we desire that every one of you show the same diligence, forwardness, urgency so as to realize the full confidence of faith, trust, hope until the goal,
 
“we desire” Reaffirms that the writer of the Book to the Hebrews is one of a group of Messianic Jewish leaders who are in agreement over the teaching of this work, and its application to the wider body of Jewish Messiah followers of the first century C.E.
 
We note that the faithful are admonished to show diligent forward momentum in acting out their faith because that same living faith assures them of the certain hope they have in Messiah unto the goal of eternal life made manifest in the full revelation of the world to come (Olam haba). True faith could be likened to a hybrid vehicle, following the ignition of the fuel by the battery the motion of the vehicle recharges the battery and produces additional power in order to sustain travel to the destination.
 
12 so that you will not be dull, stupid, sluggish, lazy (nōthros[G]) but followers, imitators, walking in the way (mimētēs[G], im teilchun[H]) of those who through faith, belief, assurance, fidelity, trust (pistis[G], be’emunatam[H]) and patience, endurance, perseverance (makrothumia[G], veorekh[H]) in their spirit (rucham[H]) inherit (klēronomeō[G]) the promises (epaggelia[G], et hahavtachot[H]).13 For when God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]) made a promise (epaggellō[G], hivtiyach[H]) to Avraham[H] (Father of many peoples), since He could swear (omnuō[G], lehishavah[H]) an oath by no one greater (meizōn[G], eiyn gadol[H]), He swore (omnuō[G]) by Himself, on His own soul (heautou[G], nishba benafsho[H]),
 
12 so that you will not be dull, stupid, sluggish, lazy but followers, imitators, walking in the way of those who through faith, belief, assurance, fidelity, trust and patience, endurance, perseverance, in their spirit inherit the promises.
 
Chapter 11 lists numerous examples of those who have lived lives of faith that reflect the faith being alluded to by the writer of the Book to the Hebrews.
 
In the context of the Book to the Hebrews, the promises (plural) are those made to the Jewish people in and through Abraham, reaffirmed and conferred onto Isaac and Jacob. These promises include progeny, the land of Israel and eternal covenant (unto life everlasting) [Gen. 12:2-3; 15:5; 17:5].
 
The promises of God in Yeshua, like those made to the faithful ones of the past, are established for those who maintain faith in His strength.
 
We note that affirmation of the promises (plural) precede the singling out of the promise of progeny used as an example in the next verse.
 
13 For when God made a promise to Avraham, since He could swear an oath by no one greater, He swore by Himself, on His own soul,
 
As Creator of all, nothing and no one is superior to God. Thus, with regard to the human practice of swearing to one greater, God must be described as having sworn by Himself, because there is none greater.
 
14 saying (legō[G], vayomeir[H]), “indeed, for (e men[G], kiy[H]) blessing (eulogeō[G], bareikh[H]) I will bless (eulogeō[G], avarechecha[H]) you and multiplying (plēthunō[G], veharbah[H]) I will multiply (plēthunō[G], harbeh[H]) you [your seed/progeny].” [ Gen. 22:17] 15 And so, having patiently waited in his spirit (makrothumeō[G], rucho[H]), he obtained (epitugchanō[G]) the promise (epaggelia[G], et hahavtachah[H]). 16 For indeed (men[G], kiy amnam[H]) people (anthrōpos[G], anashiym[H]) swear (omnuō[G], hashvua[H]) an oath by one greater (meizōn[G], begadol[H]), and taking an oath serves as confirmation (bebaiōsis[G]) to them, an end (peras[G], yaviy keitz[H]) of all (pas[G], lekhol[H]) strife, dispute, contradiction (antilogia[G], riyv[H]) between them (beiyneiyhem[H]).
 
14 saying, “indeed, for blessing I will bless you and multiplying I will multiply you [your seed/progeny].” [ Gen. 22:17] 15 And so, having patiently waited in his spirit, he obtained the promise. 16 For indeed people swear an oath by one greater, and taking an oath serves as confirmation to them, an end of all strife, dispute, contradiction between them.
 
“Indeed blessing I will bless you, and multiplying I will multiply your seed as the stars of the heavens and as the sand, which is on the seashore; and your seed shall possess the gate [place of governance] of their enemies.” -Bereishit (Genesis) 22:17 (Author’s translation from Hebrew text)
 
This blessing spoken over Abraham is a beginning of blessings (plural) and must not be understood to be a reference to the limited blessing of progeny alone.
 
15 And so, having patiently waited in his spirit, he obtained the promise. 
 
With regard to the specific blessing of progeny Abraham waited 25 years to receive the promise (Gen. 12:3-4; 17:2; 18:10; 21:5). Thus, he “obtained” the promise of progeny through Isaac, whom Messiah redeemed, as prefigured in the Ram (Gen. 22). Thus, Jacob is redeemed by Messiah (the Ram of God) in the loins of Isaac.
 
And with regard to the eternal covenant and the world to come Abraham died still holding on in faith to the yet to be seen reality of “a city which has foundations, whose builder and maker is God” (Heb. 11:10). Abraham exemplifies faithful trust in God, even faith unto death, a faith that prefigures that of Messiah chronologically speaking, and is established in Messiah before the foundation of the world, outside of time and space.
 
17 In the same way God (Theos[G], ha-Elohiym[H]), desiring (boulomai[G]) more abundantly (perissoteron[G]) to demonstrate (epideiknumi[G]) to the heirs (klēronomos[G], et yoresheiy[H]) of the promise (epaggelia[G], hahavtachah[H]) the fact that His purpose is immutable, unchangeable (ametathetos[G]), confirmed (mesiteuō[G]) it with an oath (horkos[G], bishvuato[H]), 18 so that by two immutable, unchangeable (ametathetos[G]) things in which it is impossible (adunatos[G]) for God (Theos[G], Ha-Elohiym[H]) to lie (pseudomai[G], lechazeiv[H]), we might have strong (ischuros[G], lehachaziyk[H]) comfort (paraklēsis[G]) who have fled for refuge (katapheugō[G]) to take hold (krateō[G]) of the hope (elpis[G], batikvah[H]) set before us (prokeimai[G]).
 
17 In the same way God, desiring more abundantly to demonstrate to the heirs of the promise the fact that His purpose is immutable, unchangeable, confirmed it with an oath,
 
It’s important to note that the first century Jewish audience understands the heirs of the promise made to Abraham as being the Israelites, given that the promises made to Abraham were ratified through Isaac and Jacob and are seen to have been passed on to Jacob’s descendants in perpetuity. This does not mean that Gentiles have no access, but that Gentiles have access through Yeshua the Jew, just as Jews receive the fullness of the promises through Yeshua.
 
18 so that by two immutable, unchangeable things in which it is impossible for God to lie, we might have strong comfort who have fled for refuge to take hold of the hope set before us.
 
Based on His nature God cannot lie. Therefore, the two things concerning Abraham a. the promise b. the oath, are immutable, unchangeable. These afford the faithful Jewish believers comfort, knowing that having fled the sinful ways of humanity, and the hypocrisy of vain religion, they have taken hold of a hope as certain as that of Abraham.
 
19 This hope we have as an anchor (agkura[G]) of the soul (psuchē[G], lenefesh[H]), a hope both certain, loyal (asphalēs[G], ne’eman[H]) and forceful, reliable (bebaios[G], vechazak[H]) and one which enters (eiserchomai[G]) into (eis[G]) the house (el mibeiyt[H]) the inner (esōteros[G]) veil [the veil hung before the holy of holies] (katapetasma[G], laparochet[H]), 20 where Yeshua[H] (Iēsous[G], Joshua, YHVH saves) has entered (eiserchomai[G]) as a forerunner (prodromos[G]) for us, having become a high priest (archiereus[G], lekohen gadol[H]) forever (eis aiōn[G], leolam[H]) according to the word, order, type, style, arrangement (taxis[G], al divratiy[H]) of Melkiy Tzedek[H] (My king of righteousness).
 
19 This hope we have as an anchor of the soul, a hope both certain, loyal and forceful, reliable and one which enters into the house the inner veil parochet[H] [the veil hung before the holy of holies], 20 where Yeshua has entered as a forerunner for us, having become a high priest forever according to the word, order, type, style, arrangement of Melkiy Tzedek.
 
The hope that the believer has in Messiah Yeshua is like a strong anchor that holds a boat sure and secure in the midst of a storm. However, while a ship’s anchor is anchored in the rock of the sea floor, which will one day pass away, the anchor of our hope in Messiah finds purchase in the heavens upon the mercy seat of God (Who is the Rock of Israel) Who is immutable, unchanging. It is a certain hope that enters the Temple (house) and in Yeshua the Great High Priest (Lev. 16:2; Heb. 9:3) has access to the holy of holies beyond the parochet (curtain)[Ex. 26:31-35; Mk 15:38], because through His death and resurrection He has sprinkled His eternal blood upon the mercy seat of the heavenly ark and as God with us His Priesthood has made eternal atonement for those who have received Him. This being prefigured in the type of priesthood practiced by the ancient priest of Salem Melkiy Tzedek.
 
“And Yeshua cried out again with a loud voice and yielded up His spirit. And behold, the parochet (curtain) of the temple was torn in two, from top to bottom…” -Matthew 27:50-51
 
Note that Yeshua’s Priesthood is likened in type to that of Melkiy Tzedek, but His practice is prefigured in the practice of the high priests of the Aaronic (Levitical) priesthood. Melkiy Tzedek the priest of Salem had no such temple or parochet (curtain). The temple, the curtain, and the holy of holies, are given to Israel as a shadow of the heavenly things. While it is clearly of great importance to understand Yeshua’s Priesthood as being over all people of faith regardless of ethnicity, it is nonetheless equally important to understand that the shadows pointing to His redemptive work are given to the chosen, ethnic, religious people of Israel the descendants of Jacob.
 
I’m told, with some derision, that I am a zealot. Sobeit, I am zealous for HaShem in Yeshua, for His Scriptures, for my people Israel, and for the Gospel of freedom. It’s better to have angered the unteachable than to have said nothing and in so doing, stolen from the teachable.
 
NB: For an explanation of the order of Melkiy Tzedek’s priesthood and why Melkiy Tzedek is not Yeshua, please read my commentary on Hebrews 5.
 
Copyright 2021 Yaakov Brown

​Introduction:
 
Yeshua was introduced as Kohen HaGadol at 2:17. The writer now continues an exposition of Psalms 110:4 (Heb. 4:14-7:28), focusing on the role of Messiah Yeshua as Kohen HaGadol of a transcendent priesthood that is superior to that of both Aaron & Melkiy Tzedek (whose priesthood is a type ordered by Yeshua as a prophetic marker pointing to Yeshua’s Priesthood. Being that Yeshua’s Priesthood existed before creation and makes atonement possible for all who believe [1 Peter 1:19-20; Rev. 13:8]).
 
As is the case with all Scripture (scrolls of the original texts), there are no chapter breaks or verse markers (or punctuation for that matter) in the scroll of the Book to the Hebrews. It’s important to see the text of this chapter as a continuation of the previous chapter, the last verses of chapter 4 being:
 
14 Therefore, since we have a great high priest Who has passed through the heavens, Yeshua the Son of the God, let’s hold fast to our profession. 15 For we do not have a high priest Who is unable to sympathize, have compassion with our weaknesses, but One who has been tempted, tried, examined, proved in all things just as we are, yet without sin [missing the mark set by God’s holiness]. 16 Therefore let us come freely with boldness, confidently to the throne of grace, unmerited favour, practical love, so that we may receive mercy and find grace for help at the time of our need.
 
BOOK TO THE HEBREWS Chapter 5 (Author’s translation)
 
1For every [individually and collectively] high priest taken from among men [in the children of man] receives by appointment on behalf of people the things brought before the face of God [Ex. 28:1], so that he might offer both gifts, and sacrifices upon sins [missing the mark set by God’s holiness]; 2 So he is able to have compassion on those who lack knowledge and are misguided, deceived, gone astray, seduced, since he in his soul also is clothed from head to foot in weakness; 
3 also because of this he is bound, obligated to offer sacrifices for sins [missing the mark set by God’s holiness] for his soul [Lev. 9:7; 16:6], as well as for the people. 4 also no one takes, receives the honour, price, upon his soul, but receives it when he is called by the God, just as Aharon[H] also was [Num. 16:40; 18:7; 2 Chr. 26:18].
5 So too Messiah did not glorify His soul in becoming a high priest, but the One Who glorified Him was He who said to Him, “You are My Son, Today I have fathered [begotten] You” [Ps. 2:7; cf. Phil. 2:3-11]; 6 just as He also says in another place, “You are a priest forever According to the order, arrangement, fashion, style of Melkiy-tzedek[H].” [Ps. 110:4 (109:4 LXX)]
7 Who in the days of His flesh, offered up both prayers and supplications/an olive branch with powerful outcry and tears before the face of He Who was able to save Him out of death, and He was heard because He feared, held God in awe. 8 Although He was a Son, He learned, understood obedience by the things which He suffered.
9 Also having been perfected, consecrated, fulfilled He became the Author, cause, source of eternal [worlds of] salvation for all those who obey Him, 10 being called among, under, by the God as High Priest according to, upon the words of the order, arrangement, fashion, style of Melkiy-tzedek[H]. [Ps. 110:4 (109:4 LXX)]11 Concerning Him [Yeshua] we have much to say, and  difficult, heavy to explain, since you have become dull, lazy, slow, poor listeners, deaf eared.
12 For though by this time you ought to be teachers, have a master’s degree, possess a doctorate, you nonetheless need to again have someone teach you to return to the first, beginning, elementary, primary principles, rudiments, elements, cornerstones of the oracles, utterances, words, essences, instructions of the God, and you have come to need milk, baby food and not strong food, oiled bread [fat bread].
13 For everyone individually and collectively who partakes of milk is unskilful, inexperienced, ignorant, has no knowledge in the word, essence of righteousness, for that one is an infant. [cf. Isa. 7:15; re. Messiah to the contrary: His spiritual maturity exceeded His physical growth] 14 But strong food, oiled bread [fat bread] is for the mature, who by reason have their senses, perception vigorously trained, exercised, their hearts, core being, inner person, examined to distinguish, discern between good and evil.
 
HEBREWS 5 (line upon line)
 
1For every [individually and collectively] (pas[G], kol[H]) high priest (archiereus[G], kohen gadol[H]) taken from among men [in the children of man] (anthropos [G], mibeneiy adam [H]) receives (lambanō [G]) by appointment (kathistēmi [G]) on behalf (huper [G]) of people (anthropos [G], beneiy adam[H]) the things brought before the face of (pros[G], lifneiy[H]) God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]) [Ex. 28:1], so that he might offer (prospherō [G]) both gifts (dōron [G]), and sacrifices (thusia [G]) upon (al[H]) sins [missing the mark set by God’s holiness] (hamartia[G], chatotam[H]); 2 So he is able (dunamai [G]) to have compassion on (metriopatheō [G]) those who lack knowledge (agnoeō [G]) and are misguided, deceived, gone astray, seduced (planaō [G]) since he in his soul (nafsho[H]) also is clothed (perikeimai [G]) from head to foot (mikaf-regel v’ad rosh [H]) in weakness (astheneia [G]); 
 
1For every [individually and collectively] high priest taken from among men [in the children of man] receives by appointment on behalf of people the things brought before the face of God [Ex. 28:1], so that he might offer both gifts, and sacrifices upon sins [missing the mark set by God’s holiness];
 
“For every [individually and collectively] high priest taken from among men” The first century Jewish audience understood this to refer to the Levitical priesthood alone. The qualification “among men” is understood as “human being”, however, in particular, from the Jewish perspective the only human beings qualified to be high priest (being of the Levitical priesthood) were Levites of the line of Aaron via Zadok, appointed by God to intercede on behalf of all Israel. The later allusion to Melkiy Tzedek is used as a type explaining the order or blueprint for the priesthood of the King Messiah, which both precedes and proceeds the temporal priesthoods, Levitical and pre-Levitical (Melkiy Tzedek).
 
“receives by appointment on behalf of people the things brought before the face of God [Ex. 28:1]” God alone appointed the true Levitical high priests of Israel. Their role appointed by God and received in humility. The high priest was tasked with bringing the offerings and sacrifices of the people before the face of God with consecrated ritual, fear and trembling. He was responsible for the blood of the goat sacrificed (Messiah) to allow the escaping goat (Israel) to go free. This blood was brought into the holy of holies, once a year at Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement, purging, covering).
 
“so that he might offer both gifts, and sacrifices upon sins [missing the mark set by God’s holiness];” The high priest was tasked with carrying both the freewill gifts (love offerings) and the sacrifices upon sin (symbols of the need for blood atonement) before the face of God, His manifest Divine presence.
 
From the earliest days of Biblical Judaism it was understood that sin separates humanity from right relationship in God and must be atoned for through the shedding of blood. The Hebrew word mizbeach (altar) is from the root zabach (kill, slaughter, sacrifice). In fact it is a contracted form of the words mi (from) and zabach (slaughter). Therefore, everywhere in Scripture, from the earliest occurrence (Cain and Abel [inferred] Gen. 4; Noah Gen 8:20) to the last mention (Rev. 16:1), the word altar means “from slaughter/blood”. Only when it is otherwise qualified e.g. “incense altar”, does it refer to a non-slaughter altar, and even then the cost of sacrifice is connected to the application of the incense upon that specific altar.
 
2 So he is able to have compassion on those who lack knowledge and are misguided, deceived, gone astray, seduced, since he in his soul also is clothed from head to foot in weakness; 
 
The high priest in question is the sin affected human Levitical high priest (descended from Aaron). A priest who must first offer sacrifices for his own sin and that of his family before offering them on behalf of others (Lev. 6:9-13; 16:5-22). Therefore, being a sin affected human being he can relate to other sin affected human beings and is profoundly aware of his own need for atonement by blood. The Hebrew translation of the present text is beautiful, as it identifies the first (head) and final (foot) parts of the priest’s body which were consecrated by blood to symbolize the need for atonement over every part of the human soul (Ex. 29:20; Lev. 8:23-24; 14:14-28). Blood on the right ear symbolizing the need for atonement over the faculty of hearing and perception. Blood on the right thumb denoting atonement over the strength and actions. Blood on the big toe of the right foot to represent atonement over the path and direction of the soul person.
 
“those who lack knowledge and are misguided, deceived, astray, seduced” This does not refer to the wilfully unrepentant for whom there is no atonement. Forgiveness is offered to all but received only by the repentant through blood. This distinction is made clear by the Scriptures, which regard unintentional sin (Lev. 4; Num. 15:27-29; Isa. 53:6) as being different to defiant rebellion against God (Num. 15:30-31; cf. Heb. 6:4-6; 10:26-31).
 
“clothed from head to foot in weakness;” This is an allusion to the human condition. We are weak/vulnerable to sin because we live in a sin affected world, and are prone to act on the yetzer hara (evil inclination).
 
With regard to “weakness” the Mishnah Yoma 1.4, 7 recommends actions that should be practiced by the high priest in order to avoid falling asleep before the offering of the sacrifice at Yom Kippur. Weakness in and of itself is not the problem, rather giving in to temptation and using weakness as an excuse is.
 
Zechariah 3:3 describes the then (6th Century B.C.E.) high priest Yehoshua (Joshua, Yeshua) as being clothed in filthy rags (sin soiled weakness). This Joshua (Zech. 3:3), like the first Adam, was sin affected and needed to offer the temporary symbolic atonement made through animal blood in order to minister before the LORD. The Joshua (Yeshua the Messiah) Who existed before that Joshua (Zech. 3:3) and comes after him, is also clothed from head to foot in humanity, but His garments are not filthy due to sin because He remained sinless. To fit the type, Yeshua wore the unsoiled rags of humanity, whereas Joshua the high priest (Zech. 3:3) wore the soiled rags of humanity. The rags of the redeemed are of greater value than the soiled garments of kings. Joshua the high priest was of the line of Aaron, whereas Yeshua is begotten of God and born of the tribe of Judah in the line of David (king). Alternatively, Joshua the high priest dressed in filthy rags can symbolize the fact that Yeshua the Great High Priest has taken upon Himself the just punishment due for the sins of humanity.
 
Like the Levitical high priests Yeshua shared in the frailty of humanity, but unlike them He remained sinless, He did not give in to the temptation of sin (Heb. 4:15). Because sin entered the world and death with it, death comes to all who sin. A person dead in sin cannot therefore offer himself on behalf of another because a living sacrifice is required (the life is in the pumping blood). This is why it was absolutely necessary for Yeshua to remain “Living” (devoid of sin and death). So that He could offer Himself for us as a Living Sacrifice Holy and Pleasing to God. Without sacrifice Love cannot exist because in order for love to be possible the One Who offers it must risk the possibility of it being unreciprocated.
 
3 also (kai[G]) because of this (zot[H]) he is bound, obligated (opheilō[G]) to offer (prospherō[G]) sacrifices for sins [missing the mark set by God’s holiness] (hamartia[G], chatat[H]) for his soul (heautou[G], nafsho[H]) [Lev. 9:7; 16:6], as well as for the people (laos[G], ha’am[H]). 4 also (kai[G]) no one (iysh[H]) takes, receives (lambanō[G], yikach[H]) the honour, price (timē[G], et-hakavod[H]), upon his soul (heautou[G], lenafsho[H]), but receives it when he is called (kaleō[G]) by the God (ho Theos[G], Elohiym[H]), just as Aharon[H] (le’aharon[H]: Mountain, Light Bringer) also was [Num. 16:40; 18:7; 2 Chr. 26:18].
 
3 also because of this he is bound, obligated to offer sacrifices for sins [missing the mark set by God’s holiness] for his soul [Lev. 9:7; 16:6], as well as for the people.
 
The Levitical high priest must offer sacrifices for his own sin and that of his family in order to be ritually consecrated to offer sacrifices on behalf of the community (Lev. 6:9-13; 16:5-22).
 
In short, the Levitical high priesthood is revealed to be imperfect in application because of the imperfect human beings responsible for filling the role.
 
4 also no one takes, receives the honour, price, upon his soul, but receives it when he is called by the God, just as Aharon[H] also was [Num. 16:40; 18:7; 2 Chr. 26:18].
 
Aaron is mentioned because he was the first Levitical high priest appointed by God. The rosh (head, first, beginning) of the earthly Levitical priests (Ex. 28:1; Lev. 8:1-2; Num. 17:5; 18:1; Psalms 105:26). The Aaronic lineage carried on through the descendants of Zadok (2 Sam. 8:17; 1 Kings 2:27, 35) during the time of the kings. Zadok was a descendant of Phineas, son of Eleazer the son of Aaron (Ezra7:1-5).
 
During the monarchy the high priest’s role was secondary to that of the king. At that time the high priest’s authority was limited to the religious sphere. However, during the Persian period and into the Hellenistic period the high priest’s authority extended to the political realm. Thus, the Maccabees [Hasmoneans] (2nd Century B.C.E) did not receive their authority from God through genealogy (they were “bnai Hashmonay” [sons of Hashmonay], not sons of Aaron, Eleazer, Phineas, Ezra etc.) but by political self-appointment. This established precedent for the subsequent appointment of high priests. Herod the Great (72 B.C.E – 4 C.E) appointed six high priests during his reign over Judea. Therefore, like the kingship of the northern tribes (Israel/Ephraim), the apostate priesthood would come to an end.
 
We should note therefore, that the priesthood of the first century was apostate, as were its high priests. The Levitical lineage had been compromised and those acting as high priests were religious-political appointments and not God appointed.
 
As a result Jewish sects such as the Essenes, based on what they saw as an apostate (non-Scriptural) priesthood, developed their own eschatological theology regarding the kingship and priesthood of Israel. Some of the Qumran texts speak of two Messiahs, one kingly and one priestly (1QS 9:11 “the anointed one of Aaron”). Therefore, the idea of Messiah uniting the kingship and priesthood of Israel was already circulating during the first century among certain Jewish sects prior to Yeshua being revealed as King and High Priest.
 
The position of high priest was respected by Messiah Yeshua during His earthly ministry but He did not accept the first century priesthood as legitimate. In fact, the legitimate Levitical priestly line is most likely to have been that of Zechariah and Elisheva the father and mother  of Yochanan the Immerser (John the Baptist)[Luke 1:5-13; 3:2].
 
John the Immerser as a God Appointed High Priest in the Line of Aaron:
 
“5 In the days of Herod, king of Judea, there was a priest named Zechariah, of the division of Aviyah; and he had a wife from the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elisheva.” -Luke 1:5
 
Herod the Great reigned from 37 to 4 B.C.E. Long before that, during the time of King David, the priests of Israel had been arranged into 24 divisions; Aviyah (My father is YHVH) the forefather of Zechariah (John’s father) was a family head of the eighth division and a descendant of Aaron. (Nehemiah 12:12, 17; 1 Chronicles 24:1-19).
 
The meaning of Zechariah’s name (YHVH remembers) reveals that HaShem remembered His promise to bring about a new covenant, a new creation, One Who will say, “Avi-Yah,” my father is YHVH. This One (Son of God) will be heralded by the son born to Elisheva (by the oath of God), that is Yochanan (one who is favoured by God) the Immerser, who in turn will symbolically confer the priesthood of Aaron upon Messiah in submission to the High priesthood of Messiah, which is manifest in time and space in the order of Melkiy Tzedek (my king of righteousness).
 
It’s important to note that both Zechariah (1 Chronicles 24:1-19) and Elisheva (Luke 1:5) were of the line of Aaron the Kohen Gadol (The great High Priest) of Israel. Through the symbolic immersion that Yeshua received from Yochanan (John) we are able to see that Messiah unifies both the Priesthood and Kingship of Israel. The Priesthood of Aaron is symbolically submitted to the order of Melkiy Tzedek (My King of Righteousness), which is a type for the High Priesthood of Yeshua, and the position of King over Israel and the nations is something Yeshua is born to through His mother’s lineage (and symbolically through His earthly father’s lineage). Of course, ultimately Yeshua is appointed in and by God the Father.
 
All this is important because Messiah is come to reveal a greater priesthood, an eternal priesthood that has existed in Him before the foundation of the world (Psalm 110:4; Hebrews 7:17). This greater priesthood must transition within time and space from the Aaronic priesthood of Israel as it submits to Melkiy Tzedek through Abraham (Heb. 7:1-10), not so as to make the Levitical priesthood redundant but so as to cause the Levitical priesthood to fully fill its purpose and reveal the Kohen HaGadol (High Priest) Messiah Yeshua as the ultimate intermediary. 
 
Yochanan the Immerser (John the Baptist) the Son of Zechariah was a true Levite and a legitimate priest, unlike the illegitimate (political puppet) priests Annas and Caiaphas.
 
For all intents and purposes Yochanan the Immerser (John the Baptist) was a rightful heir to the priesthood of Israel. Therefore, Yochanan the Immerser was given authority by God to transfer the priesthood of Aaron onto the King Messiah. Only in this way could the roles of King of Judah (in the line of David) and High Priest be combined in One Man. The act of conferring was symbolically performed by Yochanan the Immerser at the tevilah (immersion/baptism) of Yeshua.
 
All High Priests of Israel throughout the generations must prepare themselves by washing in order to approach the Lord God to make atonement for the sins of Israel. Yeshua Who is sinless need not be immersed (baptised) for repentance, washing clean, or for any other sin related reason, thus when Yeshua said of His immersion (baptism) “Let it happen now, for in this way it is fitting for us to fulfil all righteousness.” (Matt 3:15), what He meant by “All righteousness” was for Yochanan the heir to the Aaronic High Priesthood to ritually wash Yeshua as Priest of priests, the heavenly Kohen HaGadol and make way for His sacrificial death and life giving resurrection and the means by which all who receive Him can be made righteous through His blood. This symbolic act of washing (baptism) revealed Yeshua as rightful and eternal Kohen HaGadol (High Priest) and Melekh HaY’hudiym (King of the Jews), Melekh Hamelekhiym (King of kings). Thus, Yeshua united the priesthood and kingship of Israel and showed Himself to be the King Messiah.
 
Therefore, the writer of the Book to the Hebrews is making a point of alluding to the God appointed high priest Aaron and his descendants, who received the honour of being appointed from God unlike the apostate high priests of the first century Annas and Caiaphas, who were proxies for religious political forces both Greco-Roman (Hellenistic) and Jewish.
 
5 So too Messiah did not glorify His soul (nafsho[H]) in becoming a high priest (archiereus[G], kohen gadol[H]), but He who said to Him, “You are My Son (su ei mou uhios[G]), Today (sēmeron[G]) I have fathered/begotten (gennaō[G]) You” [Ps. 2:7]; 6 just as He also says (lego[G]) in another place, “You are a priest (hiereus[G], Kohen[H])  forever (eis aion [G], leolam[H]) According (kata[G]) to the order, arrangement, fashion, style (taxis[G]) of Melkiy-tzedek[H] (My king of righteousness).” [Ps. 110:4 (109:4 LXX)]
 
5 So too Messiah did not glorify His soul in becoming a high priest, but the One Who glorified Him was He who said to Him, “You are My Son, Today I have fathered [begotten] You” [Ps. 2:7];
 
Yeshua did not name or appoint Himself High Priest (like those of the apostate priesthood of the first century C.E.), but was, like Aaron, appointed by God. However, unlike Aaron, Yeshua qualified as the transcendent High Priest (not Levitical) due to His being fathered directly by God. In short, Yeshua’s Deity as progeny of the Father and His being born as a human being within time and space mean He is able to make intercession for all humanity and to provide the eternal blood of God as atonement for sin in place of the temporary symbolic blood of animals, which could never effectively atone for sin.
 
6 just as He also says in another place, “You are a priest forever According to the order, arrangement, fashion, style of Melkiy-tzedek[H].” [Ps. 110:4 (109:4 LXX)]
 
The Priesthood of Yeshua precedes and proceeds the priesthoods of Levi and Melkiy Tzedek. Yeshua’s Priesthood is symbolised in the type of priesthood held by Melkiy Tzedek (a Gentile), meaning that Yeshua’s Priesthood is over all peoples: first, because Yeshua is God with us, and in Him all things exist and have their being, second, because He is a Jew and High Priest over the descendants of Jacob (Jews) and finally, because His priesthood is like that of Melkiy Tzedek, He is qualified to be High Priest over all other peoples (ethnicities).
 
NB: Some Jewish commentators agree with the writer of the Book to the Hebrews and interpret Psalms 110:4 as alluding to the King Messiah (Moses Hadarsan apud Galatin. l. 10. c. 6. Abot R. Nathan, c. 34.)
 
We note that Melkiy Tzedek the historical figure, is a type, a temporal pattern, a shadow for the Messiah, but is not the Messiah.
 
The Scripture states:

"And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine: and he was the priest of the most high God." -Genesis 14:18

"The LORD has sworn, and will not turn, You are a priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek." -Psalm 110:4
 
“where Yeshua has entered as a forerunner for us, having become a high priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek.” -Hebrews 6:20
 
“This Melchizedek was king of Salem and priest of God Most High. He met Abraham returning from the defeat of the kings and blessed him, 2 and Abraham gave him a tenth of everything. First, the interpretation of the name Melchizedek means “king of righteousness”; then also, “king of Salem” means “king of peace.” 3 Without father or mother, without genealogy, without beginning of days or end of life, resembling the Son of God, he remains a priest continually.” -Hebrew 7:1-3

First, Melkiy Tzedek is an historical human king of Salem (the then capital of Jebus [a pagan name for Jerusalem associated to a false deity]). While we are not told his lineage we do know he was not a descended of Abram (Abraham). At that time in history numerous false deities were worshipped on the mount in Jerusalem (Jebus), none of whom were YHVH. Therefore, the Hebrew text specifies that Melkiy Tzedek did not know the God of Israel as YHVH, but by a generic title El Elyon (God most high, or the God above all gods). Has there ever been a point at which Yeshua has not known God as YHVH? The answer is absolutely not. Thus, Melkiy Tzedek the historical figure is not Yeshua.

Second, both the psalmist and the kohen (priest) who authored the Book to the Hebrews state clearly that Yeshua the King Messiah is a priest after THE ORDER of (Like) Melkiy Tzedek (the historical human priest who ministered to Abram), and not literally Melkiy Tzedek. If the Holy Spirit had intended us to understand Yeshua to literally be Melkiy Tzedek He would have authored the words "priest, who is the same as Melkiy Tzedek" or “Yeshua is Melkiy Tzedek…” or something likewise definitive. He did not.

Third, the kohen (priest) that authored the book to the Hebrews makes it clear that he is using the historical human king Melkiy Tzedek to teach a drash (comparative teaching), a figurative comparison. He writes “the interpretation of the name Melkiy Tzedek”, using the meaning of the name as a spiritual mystery expounding the character of the King Messiah, Who is “My King of Righteousness” by nature, but is not the literal historical person Melkiy Tzedek the king of Salem in Jebus. As an example, “the interpretation of” my daughter AzarYah’s name is “My Helper is YHVH” this points to YHVH as our Helper (the Holy Spirit), but it does not make my daughter the Holy Spirit.
 
Fourth, Messiah is never "pre incarnate" in the Hebrew Scriptures. He appears resurrected, transcendent and unbound by time and space as "the Angel of the presence" (to Abram, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, Joshua, Manoah etc.) but is never represented as a specific historical personage (this excludes Melkiy Tzedek the historical figure from being a transcendent incarnation of Yeshua).

Fifth, the historical figure Melkiy Tzedek was not a Jew. The King Messiah Who reigns as High Priest over all peoples must first be a Jew (of Judah, as the writer of Hebrews specifies [Heb. Chpts 6 & 7]) or He is no High Priest at all. This fact alone makes it impossible for Melkiy Tzedek the historical king of Salem (a non-Jew) to be the Messiah Yeshua “pre incarnate” or otherwise. The priesthood of Yeshua unifies the kingship and priesthood of Israel, subjecting the priesthood of Israel to the priesthood after the order of Melkiy Tzedek. An order established before Melkiy Tzedek was born by Yeshua in YHVH.
 
Sixth, when the text of the Book to the Hebrews says “Without father or mother, without genealogy” it does not mean that Melkiy Tzedek the historical person was literally without these things but that the Torah does not record his genealogy because he is not part of the genealogical record that points to the historical/religious progression of the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the Jewish people (Israel).
 
The wider context of Scripture, the context of the text of the Book to the Hebrews and the poetic language of the Psalmist, all explain clearly that Yeshua the King Messiah will be “like” but not the same person as Melkiy Tzedek the historical figure (Genesis 14).

The Scripture does not teach that Yeshua is Melkiy Tzedek, but that His priesthood is after the order of  Melkiy Tzedek because Yeshua's priesthood which is like that of Melkiy Tzedek is a priesthood over all ethnicities and like the priesthood of Melkiy Tzedek, which appears to continue perpetually, Yeshua’s priesthood is everlasting.

As I have stated previously, to say that the historical figure Melkiy Tzedek of the Tanakh (OT) and Yeshua the King Messiah are one in the same is blasphemous (idolatry) and those that teach it do so at their peril.
 
7 Who in the days (hēmera[G], biymeiy[H]) of His flesh (sarx[G], bivsaro[H]), offered up (prospherō[G]) both prayers (deēsis[G], tefilot[H]) and supplications/an olive branch (hiketēria[G]) with powerful (ischuros[G]) outcry (kraugē[G]) and tears (dakru[G]) before the face of (lifneiy[H]) He Who is able (dunamai[G]) to save (sōzō[G]) Him (autos[G]) out of (ex[G]) death (thanatos[G], mavet[H]), and He was heard (eisakouō[G]) because (apo[G]) He feared, held God in awe (eulabeia[G]). 8 Although (kaiper[G]) He was a Son (uihos[G], vein[H]), He learned, understood (manthanō[G], lumad[H]) obedience (hupakoē[G]) by the things which He suffered (paschō[G]).
 
7 Who in the days of His flesh, offered up both prayers and supplications/an olive branch with powerful outcry and tears before the face of He Who is able to save Him out of death, and He was heard because He feared, held God in awe.
 
Yeshua is the nearest subject as High Priest “after the order of” Melkiy Tzedek.
 
Yeshua during the days of His fragile flesh, living in a sin affected creation, prayed and pleaded with God through tears for the redemption of human beings, knowing that God was able to deliver Him from death and make salvation available to all who would believe (Luke 22:39-44).
 
The Greek hiketēria refers to the use of a wool covered olive branch as a symbol of suing for peace. Yeshua sues for peace on our behalf.
 
8 Although He was a Son, He learned, understood obedience by the things which He suffered.
 
Although Yeshua, being the Son of God and the manifest person of God with us, could have invoked His right as Son in order to avoid suffering, He nonetheless humbled Himself in living as a frail human being and ultimately unto death on a Roman cross. He willingly learned obedience to the Father through His earthly ministry (Philippians 2:3-11). Therefore, He became an example to all who would receive Him and be reconciled to God through Him, that we might live as He does.
 
9 Also having been perfected, consecrated, fulfilled (teleioō[G], shalem[H]) He became the Author, cause, source (aitios[G]) of eternal [worlds of] (aiōnios[G], olamiym[H]) salvation (sōtēria[G], teshuat[H]) for all those who obey (hupakouō[G]) Him, 10 being called (prosagoreuō[G]) among, under, by (hupo[G]) the God (ho Theos[G], Elohiym[H]) as High Priest (archiereus[G], kohen gadol[H]) according to, upon the words of (al-divratiy[H]) the order, arrangement, fashion, style (taxis[G]) of Melkiy-tzedek[H] (My king of righteousness). [Ps. 110:4 (109:4 LXX)]11 Concerning Him [Yeshua] we have (yesh lanu[H]) much to say (ladabeir[H]), and  difficult, heavy (dusermēneutos[G], kaveid[H]) to explain (lego[G]), since you have become dull, lazy, slow, poor listeners, deaf eared (akoē[G], arley-ozen[H]).
 
9 Also having been perfected, consecrated, fulfilled He became the Author, cause, source of eternal [worlds of] salvation for all those who obey Him,
 
Eternal salvation is unique to Yeshua’s work. Temporal salvation may be seen in the outworking of the Levitical priesthood, but eternal salvation can only be purchased by God Himself in His Son Yeshua the King Messiah. Through His obedience Yeshua fully realised His position as Author [source] of salvation for all who would receive Him in obedience. In short, His obedience to God brings salvation to those who will be obedient to Him. Only in humbling Himself as a human being could Yeshua fully fill this role.
 
10 being called among, under, by the God as High Priest according to, upon the words of the order, arrangement, fashion, style of Melkiy-tzedek[H]. [Ps. 110:4 (109:4 LXX)]
 
Notice that Yeshua is called from within, among, under God. He is Imanu (with us) El (God). Once again, He is called according to the type, order of Melkiy Tzedek. His priesthood, like that of the earth born priest Melkiy Tzedek, is to all who share in the faith of Abraham, for the Jew perpetually first and also for the nations.
 
11 Concerning Him [Yeshua] we have much to say, and  difficult, heavy to explain, since you have become dull, lazy, slow, poor listeners, deaf eared.
 
Yeshua is the nearest subject. Melkiy Tzedek is the qualifying type for Yeshua, not the subject, Who is Yeshua Himself. Therefore, the first century Jewish audience is not being challenged concerning its knowledge of Melkiy Tzedek (an individual they already had extensive knowledge of), but concerning their laziness regarding their understanding of Yeshua’s role and identity.
 
12 For though by this time you ought to be teachers, have  a master’s degree, possess a doctorate (didaskalos[G], moriym[H]), you nonetheless need to again have someone to teach (didaskō[G]) you to return to (lashuv[H])the first, beginning, elementary, primary (archē[G]) principles, rudiments, elements, cornerstones (stoicheion[G], avneiy pinah[H]) of the oracles, utterances, words, essences, instructions (logion[G], betorat[H]) of the God (ho Theos[G], Elohiym[H]), and you have come to need milk, baby food (gala[G], lechalav[H]) and not strong food, oiled bread [fat bread] (stereos trophe[G], lelechem shamein[H]).
 
12 For though by this time you ought to be teachers, have a master’s degree, possess a doctorate, you nonetheless need to again have someone teach you to return to the first, beginning, elementary, primary principles, rudiments, elements, cornerstones of the oracles, utterances, words, essences, instructions of the God, and you have come to need milk, baby food and not strong food, oiled bread [fat bread].
 
The writer’s incredulity is palpable. He is rebuking the first century Jewish believers for their lack of maturity regarding their faith in God through Yeshua. Given generations of Torah observance and participation in the Temple cult which was passed on to them, and having now been believers in Yeshua the promised King Messiah for many years (this was written approx. 30 years after Yeshua’s ascension, about 60-65 C.E.), they are still only able to understand the basic concepts of faith through Yeshua, and this because they have been slow to hear, deaf, dull etc.
 
The Hebrew translation reads “nonetheless (you) need to again have someone teach you to return to the first, beginning, elementary cornerstones betorat in the instructions (plural of Torah)  of the God, and you have come to need milk, baby food and not lelechem shamein oiled bread/fat bread.”
 
We note that the teachings of Yeshua and His talmidiym (disciples) are likened to Torah in that they are birthed in the fundamental torat (instructions) of God. The Hebrew lelechem shamein denotes bread of the fatness of the land, full of health, prosperity, and strength. This is the bread they are missing out on because they have not conditioned their spiritual appetite to feed on anything more than the milk of a nursing child. The writer likens them to preteens who still suck at their mother’s breast. Milk does not sustain a harvester for the day’s work, the strength needed for the harvest is found in the complex carbohydrates of oiled bread/fat bread. The Jewish believers of the first century have need of solid spiritual bread in order to work in the harvest of God’s Kingdom.
 
13 For everyone individually and collectively (pas[G]) who partakes (metechō[G]) of milk (chalav[H]) is unskilful, inexperienced, ignorant, has no knowledge (apeiros[G], eiyn lo deiah[H]) in the word, essence (logos[G], bedivreiy[H]) of righteousness (dikaiosunē[G], tzedek[H]), for that one is an infant (nēpios[G]). [cf. Isa. 7:15; re. Messiah to the contrary: His spiritual maturity exceeded His physical growth] 14 But strong food, oiled bread [fat bread] (stereos trophe[G], lelechem shamein[H]) is for the mature, who by reason (dia[G]) of practice (hexis[G]) have their senses, perception (aisthētērion[G]) vigorously trained, exercised (gumnazō[G]), their hearts, core being, inner person examined (biv’chiynat lebotam[H]) to distinguish, discern (diakrisis[G], lehavdiyl[H]) between good (kalos[G], tov[H]) and evil (kakos[G], ra[H]).
 
13 For everyone individually and collectively who partakes of milk is unskilful, inexperienced, ignorant, has no knowledge in the word, essence of righteousness, for that one is an infant. [cf. Isa. 7:15; re. Messiah to the contrary: His spiritual maturity exceeded His physical growth] 
 
Nursing infants are described in Scripture by an idiom referring to their inability to distinguish between right and wrong (Jonah 4:11). Note that being able to distinguish between right and wrong is not the same as being aware of right and wrong. Right and wrong are always present in the sin affected world. Distinguishing between them is a mark of maturity.
 
Faith in Yeshua and the outworking of it goes beyond the acceptance of Him and His atoning sacrifice. Dwelling on the basic concept of salvation through blood atonement without listening to the teaching that leads to maturity, leaves a believer without knowledge of the greater implications of the outworking of righteousness.
 
14 But strong food, oiled bread [fat bread] is for the mature, who by reason have their senses, perception vigorously trained, exercised, their hearts, core being, inner person, examined to distinguish, discern between good and evil.
 
The strengthening bread of the mature is eaten by those who actively listen to and implement the Word of God through Yeshua. This involves vigorous training, gymnao[G] lit. “naked exercise”, the exercising of right action, opening the inner person to the transforming work of God’s Spirit, so that, by the work of Yeshua in us we might discern between good and evil. We are naked before God in Yeshua, devoid of so called “secret sin” because nothing is hidden from Him. All human beings have the knowledge of good and evil based on the sin of Adam and eve, and our personal individual and corporate decision to perpetuate that sin. However, only the intentional disciple of Yeshua has, by the righteousness of Yeshua within him, the true ability to discern between good and evil.
 
The danger to the believer who continues on milk alone, is that he may fail to distinguish between good and evil due to his lack of maturity and may therefore, turn aside to ungodly practice which leads to death.
 
An infant is born for the purpose of maturing. Those who grow in size but not in maturity will find themselves swayed by every ill wind in the adult world. A mother will not put up with the foolishness of an adult child who continues to demand milk from her breasts. This image goes beyond childishness to express the perversion of infantile faith.
 
Copyright 2021 Yaakov Brown

​Introduction:
 
Chapter 4 continues the exposition of Psalm 95:7-11, and makes a drash (comparative teaching) using the term “rest” as a simile for “Shabbat”, with the purpose of revealing the present, ongoing, and coming eternal rest (Shabbat) of God, which has been established from the beginning of creation. That rest being present in the Kingdom of God manifest within time and space unto the goal and the convergence of the Olam Haba [world to come] (what many Christians often refer to as Heaven: a misnomer given Rev. 21:1-3).
 
The Shabbat in question is that Shabbat which is both established in the seventh day of the creation week and proceeds the cosmic week that follows the week of creation. The weekly Shabbat observed by the people of Israel (descendants of Jacob) is a shadow of the eternal Shabbat, in the same way that the earthly Temple is a shadow of heavenly things (Heb. 8:4-5).
 
Shabbat, from the Hebrew root sheva (7, blessing, rest, sit), and related to the Hebrew word shevet (sit, dwell, settle) reflects the fullness of the attributes of God’s nature, His rest and blessing (Isaiah 6:1-5). Therefore, In God through Messiah the eternal Shabbat (rest) has existed from the foundation of the world and thus, from our view within time and space, the temporal rest of the promised land which Joshua lead Israel into (Joshua 1:13) is preceded and superseded by the eternal rest of God through Yeshua. This is consistent with the theme of Messiah’s superiority, His all-existing nature. Yeshua is Lord of the Shabbat (not just the temporal weekly Shabbat but also of the transcendent Shabbat reflected in it.
 
This teaching does not do away with the observance of the weekly Shabbat by the Jewish believer (ethnic descendant of Jacob), rather it illuminates the weekly Shabbat as a reminder of the rest experienced by creation in the beginning, and acts as a foretaste of the eternal Shabbat which already exists and will swallow up the present sin affected creation with fire (judgement) and renewal (2 Peter 3:10).
 
It’s important at this point to remind the reader that the audience of this work are late first century Jewish followers of Yeshua the King Messiah, and that their understanding sees all that is being taught in relationship to God’s continued redemptive purposes and His immutable promises to Israel, the blood descendants of Jacob. They are faced with properly understanding the nature of the passing earthly shadows of the heavens (the role of Torah, priesthood, sacrificial system, priestly practice, and Shabbat). Note that the earthly shadows are passing, neither obligatory nor permanent.
 
As is the case with all Scripture (scrolls of the original texts), there are no chapter breaks or verse markers (or punctuation for that matter) in the scroll of the Book to the Hebrews. It’s important to see the text of this chapter as a continuation of the previous chapter, the last verses of chapter 3 being:
 
18 And to whom did He swear that they would not enter His rest, but to those who were disobedient, apathetic? 19 And we see that they were not able to enter because of unbelief.
 
Which rest did the disobedient among the generation leaving Egypt not enter?
 
““Remember the command that Moses the servant of the Lord gave you after he said, ‘The Lord your God will give you rest by giving you this land.’” -Joshua 1:13 NIV
 
The rest being used as an example is the rest obtained by God’s gift of the promised land Eretz Yisrael.
 
If we fail to keep this in mind we will fail to understand the remainder of the teaching.
 
BOOK TO THE HEBREWS Chapter 4 (Author’s translation)
 
1 Fear therefore, lest while a promise remains [is to come] of entering into His rest, any one of you [souls] may seem [be thought to have] come short, fallen behind. 
2 For, indeed we have had good news preached to us, just as they also did; but the word, essence they heard did not benefit them, because they were not united, mixed, tempered together with those who in faith  heard, listened, received, understood.
3 For we who have believed, trusted, committed, enter His rest, just as He has said, “As I swore in My anger, flaring nostril, ‘They certainly shall not enter My rest.’” [Psalm 95:10-11 LXX] although His works were finished from the foundation of the world, earth and heavens. 
4 For He has said somewhere about the seventh day: “And God rested, sat down on the seventh day from all His works” [Gen. 2:2]; 
5 and again in this place, “‘They certainly shall not enter My rest.’” [Psalms 95:11] 
6 Because therefore, it remains for some to enter it, and those who before had good news preached to them failed to enter because of disobedience, apathy,
7 He again determined a certain day, “Today,” saying through David after so long a time just as has been said before, “Today if you hear His voice, Do not harden your hearts.” [Psalms 95:7-8]
8 For if Yehoshua (son of Nun) had given them rest, he would not have spoken of another day after that.
9 Consequently, there remains a Shabbat (rest, sitting, blessing) for the people of God. 
10 For the one who has entered His rest has himself also rested, restrained from his works, as the God did from His. 
11 Therefore let’s be diligently labouring to enter that rest, so that no one will fall according to the same example, pattern of disobedience, apathy.
12 For living and effective, is the word, essence of God and sharper above any two-edged short sword, even piercing so as to divide soul life and spirit, of both joints and marrow, and able to discern the thoughts and intentions of the heart (inner being, core).
13 Neither is there any creature, building, ordinance, hidden from His sight, presence, face, but all things individually and collectively are naked and opened before the eyes of Him to Whom we must give an account.
14 Therefore, since we have a great high priest Who has passed through the heavens, Yeshua the Son of the God, let’s hold fast to our profession. 
15 For we do not have a high priest Who is unable to sympathize, have compassion with our weaknesses, but One who has been tempted, tried, examined, proved in all things just as we are, yet without sin [missing the mark set by God’s holiness]. 
16 Therefore let us come freely with boldness, confidently to the throne of grace, unmerited favour, practical love, so that we may receive mercy and find grace for help at the time of our need.
 
HEBREWS 3 (line upon line)
 
1 Fear (phobeō[G]) therefore (oun[G]), lest while a promise (epaggelia[G], ha’havtacha[H]) remains [is to come] (lavo[H]) of entering (eiserchomai[G]) into (eis[G]) His (autos[G]) rest (katapausis[G], menuchato[H]), any one of you [souls](lenafsheinu[H]) may seem [be thought] (dokeō[G]) to have come short, fallen behind (hustereō[G]). 2 For (kai[G]), indeed (gar[G]) we have had good news preached (euaggelizō[G], vesra tovah[H]) to us, just as they also did; but the word, essence (logos[G], hadavar[H]) they heard (sham’u hem[H]) did not benefit (ōpheleō[G]) them, because they were not united, mixed, tempered together (sugkerannumi[G]) with those who in faith (pistis[G], be’emunat[H]) heard, listened, received, understood (akouō[G]). 
 
1 Fear therefore, lest while a promise remains [is to come] of entering into His rest, any one of you [souls] may seem [be thought to] have come short, fallen behind. 
 
“Fear therefore” The Jewish believers of the first century are admonished to have holy fear of God because the generation of their ancestors who disobeyed God in the desert “were not able to enter because of unbelief.” In short, “fear God and avoid unbelief”.
 
“lest while a promise remains of entering into His rest, any one of you [souls] may seem to have come short, fallen behind.” While the promise of entering His (God’s) rest remains, continues to be accessible to the Jewish believers (meaning unto the goal of time and space), we must be careful not to fall short of it through unbelief.
 
While the original temporal rest of the promised land offered by God through Joshua (Joshua 1:13) had been entered into by some (Joshua, Caleb and their families along with the subsequent generation born of the disobedient), even some of those who received this Book to the Hebrews (Jewish believers still living in the land of Israel prior to 70 C.E), it was nonetheless always to be a temporal shadow of the eternal land promised to Israel (part of the world to come), entry to which continues to be offered to the descendants of Jacob through the final Joshua, Yeshua the King Messiah.
 
The writer of the Book to the Hebrews, understanding that in the context of Psalms 95, the rest being entered into was the promised land (eretz Yisrael) [ref. Joshua 1:13], now makes a comparative drash alluding to the eternal rest of God as having been established from the beginning of creation (Gen.2:2). He makes clear that the eternal rest of God was always offered to Israel through Yeshua the King Messiah, and that the temporal rest offered in the land has always been a shadow of the eternal rest that exists outside of time and space. Not that Israel will fail to possess the land promised to her by God as an everlasting possession (Gen. 15), but that she will possess that land renewed, recreated, everlasting, in the Olam Haba (world to come).
 
“Remember the command that Moses the servant of the Lord gave you after he said, ‘The Lord your God will give you rest by giving you this land.’” -Joshua 1:13 NIV
 
Therefore, the temporary, earthly rest gained under the leadership of Joshua at God’s instruction was pointing to the transcendent and eternal, metaphysical, spiritual, rest of God established in creation and fully filled in the renewed creation.
 
2 For, indeed we have had good news preached to us, just as they also did; but the word, essence they heard did not benefit them, because they were not united, mixed, tempered together with those who in faith  heard, listened, received, understood.
 
“For, indeed we have had good news preached to us, just as they also did;” The good news/Gospel (euaggelizō[G], vesra tovah[H]) the generation escaping Egypt had received was in historical context, the news of the promised rest of God in the promised land of Israel (Joshua 1:13). However, it was also the transcendent good news of Messiah, Who, resurrected and unbound by time and space has made salvation available to all, regardless of their position within the limitations of chronology. That Good News made evident in the delivering of the snake bitten through gazing upon the defeated snake held up on a bronse stake by Moses the drawn out one (Num. 21).
 
Therefore, “we have had good news preached to us, just as they also did;” makes the Good News/Gospel of Yeshua the King Messiah available to every generation. Anything else denies God’s justice and impugns His character, for in a certain place Messiah has said “No one comes to the Father (God) except through Me” (John 14:6). From the first man Adam until the last human to be born prior to the goal (end) of the present created order, all are offered an opportunity of redemption and eternal life by the just God of creation through the Last Adam (Yeshua) [1 Cor. 15:45].
 
“The word they heard did not benefit them because they were not united, together with those who in faith heard, listened” Not because they were entirely devoid of faith of any kind, but because they were not united in faith with those who truly listened to the voice of God (specifically Joshua & Caleb: Num. 13:30-14:10). In short, faith alone is not enough, faith grows in relationship and is proved in action (Yaakov [James] 2:14-25). The emphasis is on the need for each believer to be strengthened by the community of faith. This is pretext to the explicit allusion to the same idea recorded later in the Book to the Hebrews.
 
“And let us consider how we may spur one another on toward love and good deeds, 25 not giving up meeting together, as some are in the habit of doing, but encouraging one another—and all the more as you see the Day approaching.” -Hebrews 10:24-25 NIV
 
3 For we who have believed, trusted, committed (pisteuō[G], hama’amiyniym[H]) enter (eiserchomai[G]) His rest (katapausis[G], menuchato[H]), just as He has said, “As I swore (omnuō[G], nishbatiy[H]) in My anger, flaring nostril (orgē[G], veafiy[H]), ‘They certainly shall not enter (eiserchomai[G], im-yevoun[H]) My rest (katapausis ego[G], el-menuchatiy[H]).’” [Psalm 95:10-11 LXX] although His works (ergon[G]) were finished from the foundation (katabolē[G], behivaseid[H]) of the world, earth and heavens (kosmos[G], eretz veshamayim[H]). 4 For He has said (ereō[G]) somewhere about (peri[G]) the seventh day (hebdomos[G], al yom hashviyiy[H]): “And God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]) rested, sat down (katapauō[G], vayishbot[H]) on the seventh day (bayom hashviyiy[H]) from all (mekol[H]) His works (ergon[G], melachto[H])” [Gen. 2:2]; 
 
3 For we who have believed, trusted, committed, enter His rest, just as He has said, “As I swore in My anger, flaring nostril, ‘They certainly shall not enter My rest.’” [Psalm 95:10-11 LXX] although His works were finished from the foundation of the world, earth and heavens. 
 
Psalms 95, requoted here, was sung during the weekly Shabbat services in the Temple and remains part of the weekly Shabbat liturgy in the synagogue to this day. The writer’s Jewish audience understand the intrinsic connection between this Psalm and the weekly Shabbat.
 
In the same way that entering into the physical rest of the land of Canaan demanded faith in God’s promise, so too entry into the eternal rest through salvation in Messiah demands faith as an ongoing commitment to walking with Yeshua in God.
 
“we who have believed, trusted, committed, enter His rest…” Those of us who believe and are committed to Yeshua in God have begun and are continuing to “enter His rest”. The text is in the present continuous sense, meaning that it is an ongoing process.
 
It’s important to remember that belief (faith, trust) births action and action is the reciprocating child of belief. One who believes that action is incumbent upon him is in bondage to himself, but the one whose actions are born of his belief is free. Nothing free ever comes from obligation.
 
“His works were finished from the foundation of the world, earth and heavens.” The eternal Shabbat established in God has been present and offered to humanity from the foundation of creation. His rest is already a reality for those willing to receive it. “His rest” means that the rest in question belongs to and is in God. It is made available to humanity (always first for the Jew and also always for the Gentile ref. Rom. 1:16) through Yeshua the King Messiah. The rest God calls us to is not “our rest” but “His rest”.
 
The rest in question is present in the receipt of salvation, discipleship, future Messianic age and the Olam Haba (world to come) as a complex unity. It is all these and no single separated part of the sum.
 
Rav Kattina teaches that the six millennia of world history will be followed by a millennium of Shabbat, the Messianic age (Sanhedrin 97a). In Biblical Hebrew thought 1000 is symbolic of eternity or perpetuity. Therefore, Jewish tradition affirms the eternal nature of the Shabbat rest of the Olam Haba (world to come).
 
4 For He has said somewhere about the seventh day: “And God rested, sat down on the seventh day from all His works” [Gen. 2:2]; 
 
Once again the writer does not quote chapter and verse. Rather he alludes to a text that is well known and presumes the audience will be familiar with it. The Hebrew text of Genesis 2:2 literally says that God “sat down on the seventh day”. In very simple and profound terms, to receive the good news of Yeshua is to sit in immutable rest and security with God (the YHVH Merciful Elohiym Judge).
 
5 and again in this place (uvamakom hazeh[H]), “‘They certainly shall not enter (eiserchomai[G], im-yevoun[H]) My rest (katapausis ego[G], el-menuchatiy[H]).’” [Psalms 95:11] 6 Because (epei[G]) therefore (oun[G]), it remains (apoleipō[G]) for some to enter (eiserchomai[G]) it, and those who before (proteron[G]) had good news preached (euaggelizō[G], vesra tovah[H]) to them failed to enter (eiserchomai[G]) because of disobedience, apathy, (apeitheia[G]) 
 
5 and again in this place, “‘They certainly shall not enter My rest.’” [Psalms 95:11] 6 Because therefore, it remains for some to enter it, and those who before had good news preached to them failed to enter because of disobedience, apathy,
 
“Those who before” Are those of the generation that came out of Egypt. Therefore, the generation that escaped Egypt also were given the euaggelizo Good News (as previously explained) but with the exception of Joshua and Caleb and their families, that generation rejected the Good News through disobedience and apathy. The generation escaping Egypt was given the Torah at Sinai and with it the weekly Shabbat sign of distinction commanded to ethnic Israelites (Exodus 31:16-17). Following this, while numerous acts of disobedience contributed, nonetheless one single act of disobedience prevented the disbelieving of that generation from entering the rest of the promised land (Joshua 1:13). It was their refusal of the euaggelizo Good News/Gospel spoken by Joshua (& Caleb) concerning the promised land. Joshua being a type in both name and action for the future King Messiah Who would lead Israel into the eternal promised land (Olam Haba). Note that the disobedient who failed to enter the rest were weekly Shabbat keepers.
 
Once again, the writer of the Book to the Hebrews, understanding that in the context of Psalms 95, the rest being entered into was the promised land (Eretz Yisrael), now makes a comparative drash alluding to the eternal rest of God as having been established from the beginning of creation (Gen.2:2). He makes clear that the eternal rest of God was always offered to Israel through Yeshua the King Messiah, and that the rest offered in the land has always been a shadow of the eternal rest that exists outside of time and space, albeit in the eternal land (Israel [chosen, ethnic] will have the promised land Ertez Yisrael in the world to come, but it will be renewed/recreated undefiled).
 
“Remember the command that Moses the servant of the Lord gave you after he said, ‘The Lord your God will give you rest by giving you this land.’” -Joshua 1:13 NIV
 
Therefore, the temporary, earthly rest gained under the leadership of Joshua son of Nun, at God’s instruction, was pointing to the transcendent and eternal, metaphysical, spiritual rest of God established in creation. This is evidenced by the continuing invitation of Psalms 95:7-8.
 
7 He again (palin[G]) determined (horizo[G]) a certain (tis[G]) day (hemera[G]), “Today,” (sēmeron[G], hayom[H]) saying (lego[G]) through David[H] (Beloved) after (meta[G]) so long (tosoutos[G]) a time (chronos[G]) just as has been said before, “Today (sēmeron[G], hayom[H]) if (ean[G], im[H]) you hear (akouō[G], tishmau[H]) His voice (phone[G], bekolo[H]), Do not (me[G]) harden (sklērunō[G]) your hearts.” [Psalms 95:7-8] 8 For if Yeshua/Yehoshua[H] (Iesous[G] Joshua: YHVH Saves) had given them rest (katapauō[G]), he would not have spoken of another (allos[G]) day (hemera[G]) after that. 
 
7 He again determined a certain day, “Today,” saying through David after so long a time just as has been said before, “Today if you hear His voice, Do not harden your hearts.” [Psalms 95:7-8]
 
“Today” Meaning both David’s time and the time of the writing of the Book to the Hebrews.
 
King David lived centuries after Joshua. Therefore, the settlement of Canaan by Joshua, Caleb and the generation following those who were disobedient, did not fully fill the promise of rest. That promise being one of eternal rest in the recreated promised land within the Olam Haba (world to come).
 
The everlasting nature of the Shabbat rest of God is further illuminated by Yeshua the King Messiah:
 
“And as for the resurrection of the dead, have you not read what was said to you by God: ‘I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob’? He is not God of the dead, but of the living.” -Matthew 22:31-32 ESV
 
“if you hear His voice” Does not mean “if the message is spoken to you” but “if, once the message has been spoken to you, you choose to hear, listen, receive, understand…”
 
“Do not harden your hearts” These words are spoken to soft hearts as a warning against hardening.
 
“Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi went to the Messiah. He said to the Messiah: Greetings to you, my rabbi and my teacher. The Messiah said to him: Greetings to you, bar Leva’i. Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said to him: When will the Master come? The Messiah said to him: Today. Sometime later, Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi came to Elijah. Elijah said to him: What did the Messiah say to you? He said to Elijah that the Messiah said: Greetings [shalom] to you, bar Leva’i. Elijah said to him: He thereby guaranteed that you and your father will enter the World-to-Come, as he greeted you with shalom. Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said to Elijah: The Messiah lied to me, as he said to me: I am coming today, and he did not come. Elijah said to him that this is what he said to you: He said that he will come “today, if you will listen to his voice” (Psalms 95:7).” -Talmud Bavliy Sanhedrin 98a 17
 
8 For if Yehoshua (son of Nun) had given them rest, he would not have spoken of another day after that. 
 
The Greek Iesous meaning Yeshua is used here to refer to Joshua son of Nun and not to Yeshua the Messiah. Yehoshua or its shortened form Yeshua was a common name among Jews of every period, being that Joshua is a hero of Biblical Jewish faith whose name means YHVH is salvation. Because the writer of Hebrews was writing to first century Jewish believers he need not clarify which Yeshua he is speaking of. Those who received this work understood the context of the Scripture which the writer was expounding. Where the King Messiah is meant a qualifying title or description is included, as is the case later in this chapter, where He is called Yeshua the Son of God (v.14).
 
If those of the generation of Joshua had entered the rest being spoken of, David would not have had to speak of another day called “today”.
 
9 Consequently, there remains (apoleipō[G]) a Shabbat[H] [rest, sitting, blessing] (sabbatismos[G]) for the people (laos[G], le’am[H]) of God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]). 10 For the one who has entered (eiserchomai[G]) His rest (katapausis[G], menuchato[H]) has himself also rested, restrained (katapauō[G]) from his own (autos[G]) works (ergon[G]), as the God (ho Theos[G], Elohiym[H]) did from His. 11 Therefore let’s be diligently labouring (spoudazō[G]) to enter (eiserchomai[G]) that rest (katapausis[G]), so that no one will fall (piptō[G]) according to the same example, pattern (hupodeigma[G]) of disobedience, apathy, (apeitheia[G]). 
 
9 Consequently, there remains a Shabbat (rest, sitting, blessing) for the people of God.
 
“there remains a Shabbat” First, this verse speaks of “a Shabbat” and not “the Shabbat (weekly)”. Shabbat can refer to the weekly Shabbat, or to any of the high days of the Biblical festivals. Thus, Israel has many Shabbatot (sabbaths). What’s more, Shabbat literally means “rest” (those foolish Messianics who claim the word “rest” is not present in the text of Heb. 4:9, clearly don’t understand the Hebrew language, Biblical or otherwise).
 
Had the writer intended to convey the weekly Shabbat as being the Shabbat that remains he would have used the definite article and called it “the Shabbat”. The Shabbat that remains cannot be the weekly Shabbat observed in the sin affected creation. That weekly Shabbat will not remain, because eternity is a perpetual Shabbat and not a temporary break in the sin affected weekly rhythm of the present order. Further still, the disobedient generation who did not enter the rest that remains, were weekly Shabbat keepers (as per Sinai and the giving of Torah). Therefore, to claim that the Shabbat being spoken of here is the weekly Shabbat is to diminish the promise and make it worthless.
 
The idea that the Shabbat rest of God that remains is everlasting is consistent with ancient Jewish writings. Qumran’s 4QShirShabba describes the heavenly host celebrating the transcendent heavenly Shabbat. Likewise Mishnah Tamid 7:4 describes the Messianic age as an eternal Shabbat. Neither of which are the weekly Shabbat, which is not more than a shadow of the heavenly Shabbat. Weekly Shabbat keeping is of benefit only if it is observed in freedom out of love and acknowledged as a “sign” between God and the ethnic descendants of Jacob.
 
If you keep the Shabbat out of obligation you have failed to obey the commandment. Obligation is hard work, there is no rest in obligation (Shemot [Exodus] 31:16-17, Galatians 5:1).
 
“for the people of God” In the context of the Book to the Hebrews “the people of God” are the Jewish people, in particular the Messiah following Jews of the first century C.E. (the recipients of this work). The Hebrew descriptor “People of God” alludes to the ethnic descendants of Jacob (Judges 40:2; 2 Samuel 14:13). The Greek “laos” used here in the Book to the Hebrews is used throughout the Septuagint LXX to refer to ethnic Israel, the descendants of Jacob (Exodus 33:13, 16; Deut. 7:6; Hosea 4:6, 8, 12). The most common Biblical application of the phrase “People of God” is to ethnic Israel, the descendants of Jacob.
 
While it’s true that elsewhere in the Brit Chadashah (NT) Gentile followers of Yeshua are grafted into the wider meaning of the descriptor “People of God” (Acts 15:14; 18:10; Romans 9:25; 11; 1 Peter 2:10), it is nonetheless not the case in the present passage.
 
This does not negate an application by extension to all Messiah followers, but it does establish context so as to avoid the zealous overreach of the law keeping rhetoric of certain Messianic Jews and far too many Messianic Gentiles (so called). Those who insist that these verses support the idea that all followers of God must keep the weekly Shabbat, have not read them in context, nor have they properly considered the wider Scriptural imperative regarding the weekly Shabbat.
 
Additionally, being grafted into the Commonwealth of Israel (Rom. 11; Eph. 2) does not make a Gentile person ethnically or spiritually Jewish any more than being a part of the Commonwealth of Great Britain makes an indigenous Cree person (Canadian native) a Briton (tribal, ethnic, of Britain). Those grafted into the Commonwealth of Israel feed from the faith root of the natural olive tree (ethnic Jews/Israelites) but do not fruit the same variety of fruit as the natural tree.
 
As a manager of a garden centre for a number of years (prior to becoming a Spiritual Leader) I noted that the multi-graft olive trees we sold fruited the fruit of their original (wild) plants where they had been grafted to the natural (base stock) plant. In short, a burgundy-brown coloured (Kalamata) olive from a wild tree grafted to the green olive (Castelvetrano) of the natural tree, nonetheless fruited burgundy-brown year after year, likewise a black olive (Bella di Cerignola) from another wild tree, and so on (we sold trees of up to four grafts of wild olives attached to the root stock of the base plant). After all, what is the point of a multi-graft olive tree that bears only the fruit of the natural tree?
 
With regard to the teaching of Romans 11/Ephesians 2, spiritually and ethnically speaking, being grafted in by faith through Yeshua the King Messiah to the root source (that which feeds the tree) does not mean a loss of ethnicity (culture, uniqueness, identity, flavour, colour), nor does it mean appropriation of the mother tree’s ethnicity (culture, uniqueness, identity, flavour, colour).
 
Learn this lesson well Gentile brothers and sisters: God did not make a mistake when He made you of a different ethnicity to that of Israel (Jewish people). Nor does He require you to become Jews. Freedom is in Messiah alone, all else is idolatrous nonsense. Be the Messiah essential you, expressing all that is godly within your own ethnic cultural identity in Yeshua.
 
The Shabbat in question (Heb. 4:9) has clearly not been entered into by the ancient generation of disobedient Israelites (escaping Egypt) who nonetheless had kept the weekly Shabbat since receiving the command at Sinai, and died subsequently after complaining against God. Therefore, the weekly Shabbat cannot possibly be the Shabbat being spoken of here.
 
We are again reminded that added to this is the fact that the audience of the Book to the Hebrews are first century Jewish believers who are already keeping the weekly Shabbat, but are nonetheless being admonished to work to enter Shabbat (v.10-11), why? If they’re already keeping the weekly Shabbat, why would they need to work at entering, unless the Shabbat being spoken of is not the weekly Shabbat. The weekly Shabbat (which the believing Jews were already keeping) is instead used as an example of the transcendent Shabbat of God accessed by those who receive His Son Yeshua in faith and action.
 
10 For the one who has entered His rest has himself also rested, restrained from his own works, as the God did from His. 
 
“the one who has entered His rest” Means that the believing Jew who has already entered God’s rest and will continue to. “The one who has entered” is the believing Jew. The rest being spoken of, called “His rest”, is the transcendent Shabbat of God (the nearest subject) established before the foundation of the world. Therefore, the one who has entered the transcendent Shabbat rest of God in Yeshua may well understand that rest, based on the observance of the weekly Shabbat, however, the weekly Shabbat is not the focus of this passage, rather the eternal Shabbat is.
 
We note that the one who has entered God’s rest has also, that is already through faith, chosen to “rest from his own works” as God rested from His work. In the case of God, His work was “very good” but in the case of the human being his work is sin affected and motivated by the evil inclination (Gen. 6:5). Therefore, the Jew who has entered the eternal Shabbat rest of God through Yeshua has learned to rest from the vanity of his own works. In short, there is no such thing as works based salvation (rest). Salvation unto rest is through Messiah in God alone and not by works, lest anyone should boast (commit idolatry)[Ephesians 2:8-9].
 
“For by grace you are saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any human should boast.” - Ephesians 2:8-9
 
It is to the great shame of many in the Messianic movement and those numerous Gentile Messianic zealots and pseudo Christian cults who do the same, that we have often taught law keeping lies based on the decontextualised teaching of Scripture portions like Hebrews 4:9-10.
 
These verses are not teaching that all believers must keep the weekly Shabbat, but that Jewish believers who keep the weekly Shabbat possess it as a reminder of their position within the eternal Shabbat rest of God. Meaning that the weekly Shabbat commanded to “the children of Israel”[Exodus 31:16-17] (not to all believers but to the ethnic descendants of Jacob) is a shadow cast by the heavenly Shabbat. This is consistent with the wider teaching of the Book to the Hebrews (Heb. 8:4-5).
 
The writer could not be more clear in pointing out that weekly Shabbat observance does not give the observer access to the eternal Shabbat of God. If it did, all those Shabbat keeping Israelites of the disobedient generation (who received and practiced the commandment for some time prior to refusing the message of God sent via Moses and through Joshua and Caleb) would have entered. What’s more, as the Scripture teaches, the weekly Shabbat is first and foremost a “sign” (ot, miraculous banner) between God and the descendants of Jacob alone (Exodus 31:16-17). An ethno-religious, very specific sign pointing to the eternal Shabbat purchased by the ethno-religious Jewish Messiah Yeshua. It is not a sign on the Gentiles (believers or not), nor is it incumbent upon them.
 
The Scriptures refute the false teaching that says the weekly Shabbat is incumbent on Gentile Christians. Rabbinical Judaism agrees and requires that Gentile God fearers need only keep the moral Law of Torah, sometimes referred to as the Noachide laws. Those moral laws predating the giving of the Torah and the ethno-religious sign of Shabbat. In fact, many of the moral laws which predate Torah are evidenced in other ancient moral codes such as the Hammurabi Codex 1755 B.C.E (which predates the Torah 1312 B.C.E by some 400 years) The early Jewish Church fathers also agree, and by the direction of the Holy Spirit gave the Gentile believers a concise form of the Noachide laws to guide them (Acts 15:1-35), laws which excluded the weekly Shabbat commandment.
 
Further still, in response to those who reject Scripture and claim the entire Torah to be incumbent on Gentiles, we ask “Where is it recorded that Adam, Noah, Abraham or even Jacob and his sons observed the weekly Shabbat?”
 
For further clarification please read the following exert from my previous article on the subject:
 
The Weekly Shabbat is Not Incumbent on Gentile Christians
 
“Remember Yom Shabbat, to keep it holy. You are to work six days, and do all your work, but the seventh day is a Shabbat to ADONAI your God. In it you shall not do any work—not you, nor your son, your daughter, your male servant, your female servant, your cattle, nor the outsider that is within your gates.” Exodus 20:8-10 (TLV)
 
Note that this commandment, given specifically to Israel (ethnic, religious, empirical) is to be observed by all Jews but only by foreigners (Gentiles) who live within the Jewish community: specifically among the people of Israel on their way to and within the land of Israel. This does not apply to today’s Christians who worship the God of Israel but live outside of Israel and further still, outside of the Jewish communities within the diaspora. The commandment to keep the weekly Shabbat is specifically a sign on the ethnic, religious chosen people of Israel (Jews):
 
“So Bnei-Yisrael is to keep the Shabbat, to observe the Shabbat throughout their generations as a perpetual covenant. It is a sign between Me and Bnei-Yisrael forever, for in six days ADONAI made heaven and earth, and on the seventh day He ceased from work and rested.’” -Exodus 31:16-17 (TLV)
 
We note that the weekly Shabbat is a sign between God and the ethnic, religious people of Israel (Jews). It is not a sign upon the nations.
 
When Yeshua said:
 
“the Shabbat was made for man and not man for the Shabbat” (Mark 2:23-28)
 
The only “men” present were Jews. Further, He used an example from the Tanakh in which only Jews participated. If we interpret His words to apply to all human beings, we are ignoring the historical and Scriptural context of what He said and impugning His character by suggesting that He contradicted the Torah (Exodus 31:16-17).
 
To the contrary, He is making a drash (comparative teaching) on a commandment given specifically to Israel (ethnic, religious , empirical) and not to the nations. Thus, when He says “man” He means “man” within the context of Israel (Jews) and not humanity in general.
 
If we go further and interpret His words figuratively to apply the Shabbat to all nations, we must by reason of logical progression be speaking of the eternal Shabbat at the end of the age, that is the Olam Haba (world to come) and not to the temporal weekly Shabbat commanded specifically to the Jews. All figurative interpretation must submit to the plain meaning of the text.
 
In the context of Yeshua’s words the command to keep Shabbat is not made incumbent on Gentile Christians, (who did not yet exist at the time Yeshua spoke), rather He was explaining to the Pharisees that the sign of the Shabbat upon Israel’s “men” was one of rest and restoration through the work of God and was not a form of rest purchased by either the restraint or the actions of Jewish “men” (and women).
 
All this is done to keep the Shabbat as a sign on the ethnic, religious Jewish people until the end of the age, when:
 
“‘it will come to pass,
that from one New Moon to another,
and from one Shabbat to another,
all flesh will come to bow down before Me,’
says ADONAI.” -Isaiah 66:23 (TLV)
 
The prophet Isaiah is clearly prophesying a time yet future (it will come), and is not, as some suggest, inferring that all nations should keep the weekly Shabbat in the present age.
 
This is also seen in Zechariah 14:16 where, at the end of the age (not now), the survivors of the defeated nations will repent and go up to Jerusalem to join with ethnic, religious Israel in celebration of the festival (signs) placed on the Jews. Neither passage denotes a requirement for weekly Shabbat observance by Gentile Christians in the present.
 
When Yeshua says “The Son of Man is Lord of the Shabbat” He is alluding to the Messianic title given to the Messiah in the prophecy of Daniel (Dan. 7:13-14) in order that He might be recognised as the Messiah by His disciples and any among the Pharisees who might understand and repent. While it is true that He is the Messiah over all men, we do not glean this understanding from the context of Mark 2:23-28.
 
I remind the reader that the weekly Shabbat is a sign between God and the ethnic, religious people of Israel (Jews). It is not a sign upon the nations.
 
“So Bnei-Yisrael is to keep the Shabbat, to observe the Shabbat throughout their generations as a perpetual covenant. It is a sign between Me and Bnei-Yisrael forever, for in six days ADONAI made heaven and earth, and on the seventh day He ceased from work and rested.’” -Exodus 31:16-17 (TLV)
 
Those who teach that Gentile Christians must keep the weekly Shabbat are in fact teaching Gentile Christians to usurp one of the signs that sets ethnic, religious Israel apart from the nations. Ironically, in doing so, these “Seventh Day Adventists”, “Hebrew roots Christians”, so called “Messianic Gentiles” and sadly far too many Messianic Jews, are literally teaching the practice of “Replacement Theology” (Successionism, Supersessionism, Continuationism etc.), which many of them claim to detest. Thus, they have become the worst kind of hypocrites.
 
I stand in opposition to those movements who seek to place Gentile Christians under bondage to commandments that were never incumbent upon them.
 
This is not to say that Gentile Christians can’t choose to keep the weekly Shabbat as free members of the body of Messiah Yeshua, rather it is to say that the weekly Shabbat is not incumbent upon Gentile Christians.
 
As a Jew and a follower of Yeshua set free for freedom, I don’t keep the weekly Shabbat out of a sense of obligation, but because I have come to understand that in Yeshua every day is Shabbat.
 
11 Therefore let’s be diligently labouring to enter that rest, so that no one will fall according to the same example, pattern of disobedience, apathy.
 
Once again those Jews who receive Yeshua are admonished to walk diligently in Him. Within time and space we are entering His rest so as not to remain in apathetic disobedience.
 
As explained by the text itself and its context, “that rest” is the eternal Shabbat of God established in creation and not the weekly Shabbat.
 
The Shabbat rest spoken of is God’s, as is the labour of entering. So what is the “work/labour of God”?
 
“Yeshua answered, ‘The work of God is this: to believe, trust, be committed in the One He has sent.” - John 6:29
 
We recall that the writer of the Book to the Hebrews has called Yeshua Ha Shaliach (The Sent One) the Apostle (Heb. 3:1).
 
Discipleship begins and continues in Yeshua. It is true that in Yeshua we have been saved. It is further important to realise that we are being saved. A date on a calendar is not proof of redemption, but the fruit of righteousness is evidence of it.
 
“For by one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy.” -Hebrews 10:14 NIV
 
12 For living (zaō[G], chay[H]) and effective (energēs[G]), is the word, essence (ho logos[G], ha’davar[H]) of God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]) and sharper (tomōteros[G]) above (huper[G]) any two-edged (distomos[G]) short sword (machaira[G]), even piercing (diikneomai[G]) so as to divide (merismos[G]) soul life (psuchē[G], nefesh[H])) and spirit (pneuma[G], ruach[H]), of both joints (harmos[G]) and marrow (muelos[G]), and able to discern (kritikos[G]) the thoughts (enthumēsis[G]) and intentions (ennoia[G]) of the heart [inner being, core] (kardia[G], leiv[H]). 
 
12 For living and effective, is the word, essence of God and sharper above any two-edged short sword, even piercing so as to divide soul life and spirit, of both joints and marrow, and able to discern the thoughts and intentions of the heart (inner being, core). 
 
“living and effective, is the word, essence of God and sharper above any two-edged short sword, even piercing so as to divide soul life and spirit, of both joints and marrow,” The couplets of Jewish poetry are present here in order to firmly establish the action of God’s living word essence in the person of Messiah. Soul to joint, spirit to marrow, seemingly indiscernible elements that show God’s intimate work through His living word (davar[H]).
 
The Greek “logos” equivalent to the Hebrew “davar” conveys more than written word (ketvi[H]). The Word (John 1) is present and active participating in the redemption of creation, dividing soul and spirit, joint and marrow, getting to the heart (inner being, core) of the human condition and bringing salvation and rest.
 
“The heart (inner being, core) is deceitful above all things, And desperately wicked; Who can know it?” -Jeremiah 17:9
 
“short sword” The Greek macharia describes an extremely sharp short sword or long dagger (Heb. 11:34, 37) often used by ancient Greeks and Romans as a stabbing weapon in close combat. An intimate weapon used up close. The same word is used to describe the “sword of the Spirit” as the word of God (Eph. 6:17). A surgical precision is inferred.
 
“able to discern the thoughts and intentions of the heart.” A non-Jewish writer, in keeping with the Greco-Roman worldview, might have written “discern the thoughts of the mind and intentions of the heart”. But the Jewish writer shows that he understands the heart in terms of Jewish consciousness, as the convergent centre of being (core). He does not convey God as dividing heart and mind but as the One Who discerns the thoughts and intentions of the inner person (heart, core).
 
13 Neither is there any creature, building, ordinance (ktisis[G]), hidden (aphanēs[G]) from His sight, presence, face (enōpion[G]), but all things (hakol[H]) individually and collectively (pas[G]) are naked (gumnos[G]) and opened (trachēlizō[G]) before the eyes of Him to Whom we must give an account (hemin logos[G]) [alt. diyn lepeneyv[H] to be judged before His face]. 14 Therefore, since we have a great (megas[G]) high priest (archiereus[G], kohen gadol[H]) Who has passed (dierchomai[G]) through the heavens (Ouranos[G], hashamayim[H]), Yeshua[H] (Iesous[G]) the Son (ho uihos[G], ha ben[H]) of the God (ho Theos[G], ha Elohiym[H]), let’s hold fast (krateō[G]) to our profession (homologia[G]). 
 
13 Neither is there any creature, building, ordinance, hidden from His sight, presence, face, but all things individually and collectively are naked and opened before the eyes of Him to Whom we must give an account.
 
Nothing and no one is hidden from The Word of God (Yeshua), Who is the subject of the previous verse. God has committed all judgment to Yeshua (John 5:22; Acts 17:31; Romans 2:16). No one can Hide from God (Psalms 139:7-12).
 
The early Jewish believers are reminded of Yeshua’s intimate presence and their right standing before Hashem in the Messiah. The believer stands as though naked before God in Messiah, thus, we must constantly seek to be aware of Him and the right use of our parts (every element of our soul existence) in Him.
 
“For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Messiah, so that each one may receive compensation for his deeds done through the body, in accordance with what he has done, whether good or bad.” - 2 Corinthians 5:10
 
14 Therefore, since we have a great high priest Who has passed through the heavens, Yeshua the Son of the God, let’s hold fast to our profession. 
 
Yeshua was introduced as Kohen HaGadol at 2:17. The writer now begins an exposition of Psalms 110:4 (Heb. 4:14-7:28), focusing on the role of Messiah Yeshua as Kohen HaGadol of a transcendent priesthood that is superior to that of Aaron. Being that it existed before creation and makes atonement possible for all who believe (1 Peter 1:19-20; Rev. 13:8).
 
Having reminded the Jewish believers of the reality of the present and coming Judgement of God. The writer of Hebrews now reminds them of the present and continued mediation provided by Messiah Yeshua the Son of God and Kohen Gadol “Great High Priest”.
 
Yeshua will one day be our Judge, and is now and unto that day our intercessor and advocate (Heb. 7:25; 1 John 2:1). What’s more, our names are written in His book of life (Rev. 21:27).
 
“Who has passed through” Means that through His death and resurrection, being without sin, Yeshua passed through all realms and offered atonement in the heavenly holy of holies, and is therefore subject to none, but God has made all subject to Him.
 
Because Yeshua has passed through the heavens to atone for us just as the Levitical high priest of Israel made atonement in the holy place (Lev. 16:15, 17) [a shadow of the heavenly things ref. Heb. 8:5; 10:1], we must hold fast together to the profession, testimony, witness of our faith. Not simply a confession, which is an admission of belief, but a profession, and active proclamation of that belief.
 
15 For we do not have a high priest (archiereus[G], kohen gadol[H]) Who is unable to sympathize, have compassion (sumpatheō[G]) with our weaknesses (astheneia[G]), but One who has been tempted, tried, examined, proved (peirazō[G]) in all things just as we are, yet without (chōris[G]) sin [missing the mark set by God’s holiness] (hamartia[G]). 16 Therefore let us come freely (meta[G]) with boldness, confidence (parrhēsia[G]) to the throne (thronos[G]) of grace, unmerited favour, practical love (charis[G], harachamiym[H]), so that we may receive (lambanō[G]) mercy (eleos[G], chaniynah[H]) and find (heuriskō[G]) grace (charis[G], chesed[H]) for help (boētheia[G], la’azar[H]) at the time of our need (eukairos[G]).
 
15 For we do not have a high priest Who is unable to sympathize, have compassion with our weaknesses, but One who has been tempted, tried, examined, proved in all things just as we are, yet without sin [missing the mark set by God’s holiness].
 
Hebrews 2:5-18 explains that Yeshua had a human nature like ours but remained sinless. Therefore, He is able to sympathize with us rather than empathize, because being tempted and tried in every way that it is possible for a human being to be challenged, He nonetheless remained sinless. He understands the pressures of the sin affected world (sympathy) but has not acted on them, or experienced sin (empathy).
 
The three primary forms of human sin are reflected in 1 John 2:15-17:
 
“15 Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. 16 For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world. 17 And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever.” -1 John 2:15-17 KJV
 
1. Lust of the flesh
2. Lust of the eyes
3. Pride of life
 
It was to these three that Adam and Eve succumbed in the Garden of Eden (Gen. 3:1-6).
 
Yeshua on the other hand resisted all three (Matt. 4:1-11).
 
“For God has done what the Torah, weakened by the flesh, could not do. By sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin, he condemned sin in the flesh,” -Romans 8:3
 
That is not to say that the Torah is weak but that our weak flesh is unable to meet the standard it sets. Thus, Yeshua came in the weakness of our flesh in order to overcome that weakness and offer us freedom from it.
 
16 Therefore, let us come freely with boldness, confidence to the throne of grace, unmerited favour, practical love, so that we may receive mercy and find grace for help at the time of our need.
 
We can come freely and with confidence before the throne of God’s grace in Messiah because Messiah approaches with us and in us. He is both Judge and Mediator of the faithful.
 
“Throne of grace” is an unusual title, the more common designation being “throne of glory” (Jer. 14:21; Matt. 19:28). Because the context denotes Yeshua’s judgement seat, it seems likely that the “Throne of grace” refers to Yeshua’s throne. However, this does not negate the unity of God’s throne with Yeshua’s throne. As we have read previously, Yeshua is seated in the right hand of God. Locational earthly distinctions become redundant when seeking to understand the metaphysical realities of the Godhead. The Throne of God is described in 1 Kings 22:19; Isaiah 6:1; Ezekiel 1:26; Daniel 7:9.
 
Jewish tradition identifies multiple thrones, including a throne of God’s judgement and a throne of God’s mercy/grace (Targum in Psalms 29. 10. Talmud Bavliy Avoda Zara, fol. 3. 2. Zohar in Genesis fol. 38. 3. & in Numbers fol. 91. 2. & 93. 2. Megillat Esther, fol. 95. 1. Raziel, fol. 32. 1.)
 
"let my prayer come before Your throne of glory, and let my cry come before Your throne of thy mercy". -Raziel fol. 3. 1.
 
This is consistent with the present text.
 
By the grace of God Yeshua the King Messiah comes to set us free from our human propensity for sin and to walk with us in and toward the eternal Shabbat rest of God, so that we are holding His hand as we approach the throne of judgement and grace. Therefore we walk in terrified security, love engulfed fear, blissful trembling, toward Yeshua the Judge, being in Yeshua the High Priest, knowing that our names are written in the Lamb’s Book of Life. Why then would we ever be less than confident, or more than humble, except by allowing ourselves to be deluded through turning our gaze away from the King Messiah and toward the apathy of unbelief.
 
In our time of greatest need we have need of none other than the King Messiah.
 
Copyright 2021 Yaakov Brown

NB:Accounts of Yeshua’s resurrection appearances: Matthew 28; Mark 16; Luke 24
 
1 Now on the first (heis[G], echad[H]) day of the week Miriyam[H] (rebellion, Mary) of Magdala[A] (a tower) came early in the morning (proi[G], fourth watch: 3am – 6am, ba’boker[H]) while it was still dark (choshekh[H]), to the tomb, grave (mnemeion[G], ha-kaver[H]) and saw (blepo[G]) the stone (lithos[G]) removed (airo[G]) from the tomb, grave (mnemeion[G], ha-kaver[H]). 2 So she ran and came to Shimon[H] (Hears) K’fa[H] (Peter: rock) and to the other disciple (talmid[H]) whom Yeshua[H] loved as a dear friend (phileo[G]), and said to them, “They have taken the Lord (ho kurios[G]. HaAdonai[H]) from the tomb, grave (mnemeion[G], ha-kaver[H]), and I (ana[A] Aramaic is singular. The Greek is plural “we”) don’t know where they’ve placed Him.”
 
“On the first day of the week” means sometime between sundown Saturday (Shabbat) and sundown Sunday (Yom Rishon). This is three days and nights following Yeshua’s crucifixion on the Wednesday (Yom Revi’i), making this the day following the weekly Shabbat and not the Shabbat[H] Megas[G] (High Shabbat: John 19:31) of unleavened bread.
 
“Miriyam of Magdala came early in the morning while it was still dark”. The Greek “proi” refers to the fourth watch of night observed between 3am and 6am. Miriyam had waited until the completion of the Shabbat to come to the tomb. This shows a desperate devotion on the part of Miriyam, a kind of devotion that is sometimes looked down upon in faith communities as being “emotionalism”. It should be noted that Yeshua appears first to a woman, and not just any woman but a woman who had previously been considered of ill repute and out of whom Yeshua had cast sevenfold demonic forces (Luke 8:2).
 
The writer of John’s Gospel has pointed to Yeshua as God with us (Imanu-El) from the beginning and now makes a correlation between the beginning of creation and the beginning of Yeshua’s recreative act of resurrection which will birth a new creation for all who receive Him.
 
“While it was still dark…” Begins the recreation narrative and is to be compared to Genesis 1:2 “And the earth was a formless and desolately empty, and darkness was over the surface of the deep,”
 
Isaiah the prophet also prophecies these events…
 
“For behold, darkness will cover the earth
And deep darkness the peoples;
But the Lord will rise upon you
And His glory will appear upon you.
3 Nations will come to your light,
And kings to the brightness of your rising.” -Isaiah 60:2-3 NASB
 
“So she ran and came to Shimon[H] K’fa[H] and to the other disciple whom Yeshua[H] loved as a dear friend…” Yochanan the unnamed disciple and writer of this gospel is recording what Miriyam of Magdala had testified to.
 
“They have taken the Lord from the tomb, and I don’t know where they’ve placed Him.” The Aramaic “I” seems a better fit with the context, however the other gospels speak of “women” plural going to the grave which is equally likely to be what Miriyam is referring to. Therefore, both “I” and “We” are correct.
 
“They have taken Him” May refer to the Romans, the servants of the chief priests or to any other disgruntled group. Ironically later rabbinical Jewish polemics seeking to deny Yeshua’s resurrection claim that Yeshua’s own disciples took away His body in order to fabricate the resurrection.
 
3 So K’fa[H] (Peter: rock) and the other disciple (talmid[H]) left, and they were going to the tomb, grave (mnemeion[G], ha-kaver[H]). 4 The two were running together; and the other disciple (talmid[H]) swiftly outran K’fa[H] (Peter: rock), and came to the tomb, grave (mnemeion[G], ha-kaver[H]) first; 5 and he stooped down (parakupto[G]) to look (blepo[G]), and saw the linen strips (othonion[G]) lying there; however he did not go in.
 
Here Yochanan, one prone to humility none the less records accurately that he arrived at the tomb first but was hesitant to go in. One of the reasons for this may have been his association with the priesthood and the perceived Torah restrictions regarding priests and dead bodies. Another reason may have been fearful expectation. We can only surmise and conclude conjecture.
 
6 So Shimon[H] (Hears) K’fa[H] (Peter: rock) also came, following him (Yochanan), and he (Peter) entered the tomb (mnemeion[G], ha-kaver[H]); and he examined (theoreo[G])the linen strips (othonion[G]) lying there, 7 and the face-cloth (soudarion[G]) which had been on His head, not lying with the linen strips (othonion[G]) but folded up in a place by itself. 
 
Yochanan records K’fa (Peter) as being as tenacious as ever. It is K’fa who examines the tomb and the specific carved out birth where Yeshua had been laid. He checks the linen burial strips and investigates the folded face cloth.
 
The description of the grave cloths and face cloth is exceptional. The linen strips of grave cloths were lying as if the body had simply left through them without disrupting them, thus leaving them lying flat like the skin of a perforated seed pod. Second, the face cloth had been folded.
 
There is of course prolifically reported pseudo learned nonsense regarding the cloth being likened to a napkin being folded at the end of a Jewish meal. It is nonsense for a number of reasons. First, this is not an all-inclusive custom in Judaism nor can it be well documented as being the custom in the first century. Second, Yeshua was not finishing a meal, He was beginning a re-creation. Third, identifying a ritually defiled burial cloth with a napkin used to wipe the face during a meal is an abhorrent idea that breaks numerous Torah restrictions regarding ritual purity and spiritual cleansing.
 
What is important about the folded face cloth is that it denotes a transcendent and seemingly contradictory reality. Yeshua’s resurrected body moved through the linen strips leaving them lying there without need for folding, while at the same time the facecloth was likely removed by Yeshua and folded. This correlates to the fact that Yeshua will soon be recorded as having walked through walls into a room of locked doors while at the same time being in a corporeal state that allows T’oma to touch His wounds (v.19-28).
 
The message here is that the resurrected body is both corporeal and transcendent, solid and fluid, physical and spiritual and therefore meta-physical, super-natural. Most of all, this shows that time, space and matter are subject to Yeshua’s resurrected body. This affirms the Biblical Jewish belief in the meta-physical resurrection of the dead and directly opposes Gnosticism and its derivative Christian scholarship delusion of a heaven filled with the spirits of human beings devoid of corporeal nature. The promised Olam Haba (World to come) is both illuminated and affirmed by the New Testament accounts.
 
8 So the other disciple (talmid[H]) who had arrived at the tomb, grave (mnemeion[G], ha-kaver[H]) first then also entered, and he saw (eido[G]) and believed, was persuaded, trusted (pisteuo[G], vaya’amein[H]). 9 For they did not yet understand the Writing (Graphe[G], ha-Katuv[H], Scripture), that He must rise from the dead. 10 So the disciples (talmidim[H]) went away again to their own homes.
 
That which had been examined by K’fa was now seen by Yochanan and as a result Yochanan believed, trusted, was persuaded, certain of the reality of Yeshua the risen King Messiah.
At some later point in time Yochanan recalled that the Ketuvim (Writings) [the latter portion of the TaNaKH] had prophesied the Messiah’s resurrection:
 
“For You will not abandon my soul to Sheol;
You will not allow Your Holy One to see decay.” -Tehillim (Psalm) 16:10
 
Ref. Jonah (Ketuvim); Matt. 12:40; Acts 2:24-32 (HaBrit HaChadashah)
 
They returned to their own homes not because they believed Yeshua had been taken and couldn’t be found but rather because they truly believed Yeshua had been resurrected and may have presumed that He had already ascended to the Father God and would therefore not be seen by them again until the fullness of the Kingdom had come on earth as it is in the heavens.
 
11 But Miriyam[H] (rebellion, Mary) was standing outside the tomb, grave (mnemeion[G], ha-kaver[H]) weeping; so as she wept, she stooped down (parakupto[G]) to look (blepo[G]) into the tomb, grave (mnemeion[G], ha-kaver[H]); 12 and she saw clearly (theoreo[G]) two messengers [angels] (malakhim[H]) in brilliant whiteness (leukos[G]) sitting, one at the head and one at the feet, where the body of Yeshua[H] had been lying. 
 
Miriyam did not return to her home as K’fa and Yochanan had done. Behold this desperately hopeful woman who had been forgiven much and clearly had a sense of the transcendent reality that surrounded her. She weeps uncontrollably, sensing something she doesn’t fully understand, torn between grief and hope she stoops down to look into the tomb and sees two divine messengers sitting at each end of the cut out birth within the tomb where Messiah had been laid.
 
What Miriyam was seeing was a symbol of something that would transform earthly worship within time and space until the return of the King Messiah. She was looking at the heavenly reflection of the mercy seat of the Ark of the covenant. A Cheruv (Angel) at each side with wings outstretched to touch one another.
 
At that time in history the Holy of Holies was empty, devoid of the Ark of the Covenant which had been missing for centuries (last historically recorded as present during the inauguration of Solomon’s Temple 2 Chronicles 5, 6, 8; 35:3). How then was Israel to attain mercy through sacrifice? The answer is in Yeshua’s sacrifice and His blood offered on the mercy seat of the heavenly Ark for which the earthly Ark had been a shadow.
 
What Miriyam was seeing was the hope of glory, the mercy offered to all who would receive Yeshua’s saving work. Therefore, Yeshua had made it possible for all to enter the Holy of Holies through His blood. As Kohen HaGadol High Priest of the eternal priesthood (Psalm 110:4, Hebrews 5, 6, 7) Yeshua had made it possible for Miriyam (among others) to become priests of a transcendent “royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for God’s own possession, so that you may proclaim the praises of Him who called you out of darkness into His wonderful light” (1 K’fa 2:9). Based on his writings it seems that K’fa (Peter) came to understand this also.
 
This does not mean that gentile believers are a continuation of or have replaced Israel (ethnic, religious, chosen) but that God has afforded gentile believers a concession through the blood of Messiah that they might become part of the commonwealth of Israel (Ephesians 2:12) as humble members of God’s Kingdom. Gentile believers do well to remember that the New Covenant is given the Israel and Judah (Jeremiah 31:31-40) and that they are privileged to be adopted into God’s family but should maintain a humble respect for Israel considering it a privilege to have been afforded access to salvation through Israel and not in place of her.
 
13 And they said to her, “Dear woman (gune[G], ishah[H]), why are you weeping?” She answered them, “Because they have taken away my Lord (Adoniy[H]), and I do not see (eido[G]) where they placed Him.” 14 When she had said this, she turned around and saw, looked intently on (theoreo[G]) Yeshua[H]  standing there, and she did not see, perceive (eido[G]) that it was Yeshua[H].
 
There are both physical and spiritual reasons for Miriyam’s inability to identify Yeshua straight away.
 
We recall that there is a correlation here with the first creation, now sin affected, and the birth of a sinless new creation through Yeshua. The garden where the tomb was located relates to the garden of Eden and the Malakhim (Messengers, Angels) to the Cherubim of that garden tasked with guarding its entrance following the sin of Adam and Eve. We note that it was Eve who first took the fruit and that Miriyam is representative of Eve in this remez (hint). Eve had become blinded by sin and like her Miriyam was still blinded to some degree. Therefore, spiritually speaking she required Yeshua to free her from her blindness by naming her a redeemed daughter of God’s Kingdom through His death and resurrection.
 
On the other hand, physically speaking the resurrected body is devoid of the wear of human life and the effects of human existence within the fallen world and therefore appears starkly different to that of the temporal body. Some suggest that Yeshua’s beard having been torn may have disfigured His face, and that there may have been scaring from the terrible flogging and beating He had endured. Finally, “it was dark”. However, none of this can account for Miriyam being unable to recognise His voice at first (v.15). It seems that Miriyam’s tearful emotional state had temporarily clouded her judgement.
 
15 Yeshua[H] said to her, “Dear woman (gune[G], ishah[H]), why are you weeping? Whom do you seek?” Thinking that He was the gardener, she said to Him, “Adon[H] (Sir), if you have carried (bastazo[G]) Him away, tell me where you placed Him, and I will lift Him up (airo[G]).” 16 Yeshua[H] said to her, “Miriyam[H]!” She turned and said to Him in a language of the Hebrews, “Rabboniy[A]!” (which means, “my Teacher”) [My Great One].
 
The gardener allusion correlates to the first Adam. Yeshua is the “last Adam” (1 Corinthians 15:45).
 
Yeshua’s simple naming of Miriyam of Magdala brings to mind the words of HaMelekh Sh’lomo (King Solomon):
 
“My beloved speaks and says to me:
‘Arise, my love, my fair one,
    and come away;
11 for now the winter is past,
    the rain is over and gone.’” -Shir HaShirim (Song of songs) 2:10-11 NRSV
 
Simply by saying her name Yeshua frees Miriyam from emotional blindness and gives her super-real sight. Note that she “turns” to Him and sees Him in His resurrected glory and exclaims “Rabboniy” My Great One!
 
It is worth noting that although the New Testament infers that Yeshua was considered a Rabbi by some, it does not explicitly say that Yeshua received any form of rabbinical training. What the New Testament does denote is that He was a hard working labourer alongside His father for much of his life and while being a regular attendee at the synagogue and an observant Biblical Jew was not known to have a teaching and healing ministry until His thirties. We note that Yeshua therefore was qualified as the Rabbi not by human authority but by the authority of God. It is this in part that Miriyam is recognising when she exclaims “Rabboniy”.
 
“Rabbon” is the Aramaic equivalent to “Rabban” (Halichot Olam Tract. 1. c. 3. p. 25.), which is the Hebrew word given to religious teachers and leaders of great renown. In particular it was given to the heads of the central academy of the Sanhedrin. Gamli’el I, who is quoted in Acts 5:34-39, is known to Jewish history as Rabban Gamli’el.
 
It is important to note that the word “Rabbon” transliterated into the Greek text, is not known to have been used of human beings but is used often in the Talmud to call upon God as “Rabbono al olam” (Lord of the World) [Talmud Bavliy Taanit, fol. 20. 1. Sanhedrin, fol. 94. 1. Abot R. Nathan, c. 9. Bereshit Rabba, sect. 8. fol. 6. 4]. It is at least possible therefore, that Miriyam chose to say “Rabboniy” rather than “Rabbaniy” or “Rabbiy” because she had concluded by faith that Yeshua is Imanu-El (With us God), the “Lord of the World”.  
 
Yeshua reminds us that we are to place no others in the ultimate position of “Rabbi, Father , or Teacher”:
 
“But you are not to be called rabbi, for you have one teacher, and you are all students.  9 And call no one your father on earth, for you have one Father—the one in heaven. 10 Nor are you to be called teachers, for you have one teacher, the Messiah.” -Matthew 23:8-10
 
17 Yeshua[H] said to her, “Don’t cling to (haptomai[G]) Me, not yet (Oupo[G]), for I am ascending to the Father (Ho Pater[G], Ha Av[H]); but go to My brothers (achiym[H]) and say to them, ‘I am ascending (anabaino[G]) to My Father (Aviy[H]) and your Father (Aviychem[H]), to My God (Eliy[H]) and your God (Eloheiychem[H]).’” 18 Miriyam[H] (rebellion, Mary) of Magdala[A] (a tower) came and announced to the disciples (ha talmidim[H]), “I have seen with my eyes (horao[G]) the Lord (HaAdon[H]),” and that He had said these things to her.
 
The King James translation “Don’t touch Me” is inaccurate. The Greek “haptomai” means more than simply touching, it means to fasten oneself to another. Therefore, the better translation is “Don’t cling to (haptomai[G]) Me, not yet (Oupo[G])”.
 
Yeshua is not telling Miriyam to take her hands off Him, rather He is gently letting her know that now is not the time for a lengthy reunion because He is briefly ascending to the Father prior to appearing to the disciples over the following forty days before ultimately ascending to the right hand of the Father ten days prior to Shavuot (Pentecost) [Acts 1:9-11].
 
“but go to My brothers and say to them, ‘I am ascending to My Father and your Father, to My God and your God.” Literally this refers to Yeshua’s siblings, and by extension to all His brothers and sisters in God’s family. This is why Miriyam in obedience to His instruction goes and tells the disciples. In the case of His siblings, they had yet to believe in Him.
 
“My Father and your Father, to My God and your God” denotes Yeshua’s resurrection as a corporeal human being who is also God with us. He has made it possible for His brothers to say truly that God is their Father and God, while Yeshua Himself is seen as their brother and continues to submit His humanity to God as Father. Later T’oma will proclaim “My Lord and My God” in response to the reality of Yeshua’s resurrected Person.
 
“I have seen with my eyes (horao[G]) the Lord (HaAdon[H]),” and that He had said these things to her.” Yochanan the gospel writer is careful to note that Miriyam’s testimony is an eye witness account.
 
19 Now when it was evening on that day, the first (heis[G], echad[H]) day of the week, and when the doors were shut, inaccessible, locked (kleio[G]) where the disciples (ha talmidim[H]) were because of their fear of the Jewish religious leaders (Ioudaios[G], Yehudiym[H]), Yeshua[H] came and stood in their midst, and said to them, “Shalom lechem[H] (Peace, wholeness, wellbeing be to youplural).” 
 
“On the that day” Yom Rishon (Sunday), nearing the end of the day (“evening” here clearly refers to late afternoon prior to the completion of the Biblical Jewish day at sundown).
 
The disciples were meeting in secret behind locked doors for fear that the religious authorities who had been opposed to Yeshua might come looking for His disciples. It was not because of “their fear of the Jews” as some English translations foolishly render the text. Context denotes that the disciples who were themselves Jews were afraid of the religious Judeans who opposed Yeshua. Therefore to translate Ioudaios here as “Jews” is not only error, it is an affront to the gospel itself, and to the King Messiah (a Jew).
 
“Yeshua[H] came and stood in their midst, and said to them, “Shalom lechem.” The doors were locked, how did Yeshua come and stand in their midst? The only possibility is that He was able to walk through walls or materialize on the other side of doors. And yet, we know from the proceeding verses that His body was physical, corporeal, because T’oma touched Yeshua’s wounds. Therefore, the resurrected body of Messiah is not subject to the material fallen world. He is King of a new and transcendent creation and He has come into the room to reveal Himself to His faithful followers.
 
Note that Yeshua uses the familiar Hebrew greeting “Shalom lechem” Peace, wholeness and wellbeing be unto all of you. Peace Himself wishes them Peace.
 
20 And when He had said this, He showed them both His hands and His side. The disciples (ha talmidim[H]) then rejoiced when they saw the Lord. 21 So Yeshua[H] said to them again, “Shalom lechem[H] (Peace, wholeness, wellbeing be to you)”; just as the Father (Ho Pater[G], Ha Av[H]) has sent (apostello[G], shalach[H]) Me, I also send you [bid you to carry] (pempo[G], sholeiach[H]).” 
 
Yeshua has been sent as a shaliach by God to bring salvation to the Jewish people and the nations and now He sends His disciples to be Shaliachim (Sent ones) who “carry” the gospel of truth, the message of salvation through Yeshua.
 
The Hebrew shaliach meaning “sent one” is equivalent to the Greek apostello, from which we get the English apostle. Many today in the Church are adopting this title as one that sets them apart from other believers, making it a title of position over others. This could not be more contrary to the meaning of the word “apostle”. In Messiah Yeshua we are all apostles, shaliachim, sent ones, with One Ruler, Yeshua, the Head of the Body of Believers.
 
22 And when He had said this, He breathed (emphusao[G]) on them and said to them, “Take hold of (lambano[G]) the Holy Spirit (Ruach HaKodesh[H]). 23 If you send away, cancel, place an expiry on, forgive (aphiemi[G]) the sins (missing the mark of God’s Holiness, hamartia[G]) of any, their sins have been sent away, cancelled, have expired, are forgiven (aphiemi[G]) them; if a certain one (tis[G]) continues to hold (krateo[G]) his sin then his sin is retained (krateo[G]).”
 
Yeshua’s breathing on the disciples mirrors the creation of the first human being by the breath of God (Genesis 2:7). It is not the fullness of the outpouring of the Holy Spirit which would come some 50 days later but a transcendent symbolic act announcing the inception of the new creation.
 
“then the Lord God formed man from the dust of the ground, and breathed (vayipach[H]) into his nostrils the direct breath (neshamah[H]) of living (chayiym[H]); and the man became a living being (lenefesh chayah[H]).” -Bereishit (Genesis) 2:7 Author’s translation
 
All other animals were created and given both ruach (spirit) and nefesh (soul existence) due to the Spirt of God but only human beings were created by the direct breath neshamah of God. This sets humanity apart within creation. Today when liberalism equates animals and human beings it denies the truth of Scripture and insults God Who has made human beings in His image, likeness.
 
It is interesting to note that the second century Targum speaks of the King Messiah in this way:
 
"the Spirit went from between the wings of the cherubim, v’nesvayah and breathed upon Him (Manasseh) by the decree, or order of the word of the Lord.'' - Targum on 2 Chronicles 33:13
 
NB: Here Manasseh is a figure for the promised Messiah.
 
24 But T’oma[H] (twin), one of the twelve, who was called Didymus[G] (twofold), was not with them when Yeshua[H] came. 25 So the other disciples (talmidim[H]) were saying to him, “We have seen the Lord (HaAdon[H])!” But he said to them, “Unless I see in His hands the imprint of the nails, and put my finger into the nail wholes, and put my hand into His side, I will not believe, be convinced, be persuaded of (pisteuo[G], a’amiyn[H]).”
 
T’oma was no more faithless or disbelieving than any other disciple. He had not witnessed what they had witnessed and therefore, like them, needed to see it with his own eyes. The foolish defaming of his character by far too many Christian scholars is appalling.
 
In fact T’oma is in good company, after all, our rabbis say of Moses:
 
"he did not believe that Israel had sinned, but said, ‘if I do not see, I will not believe’" - Shemot Rabba, sect. 46. fol. 142. 2.
 
T’oma’s need to see for himself gave opportunity for an affirmation of the super-physical nature of Yeshua’s resurrected body.
 
26 And after eight days His disciples (talmidim[H]) were again inside, and T’oma[H] (twin) with them. Yeshua[H] came, the doors having been shut, inaccessible, locked (kleio[G]), and stood in their midst and said, “Shalom lechem[H] (Peace, wholeness, wellbeing be to you).” 27 Then He said to T’oma[H] (twin), “Place your finger here, and see My hands; and take your hand and put it into My side; and do not continue in disbelief, faithlessness, mistrust (apistos[G]), be faithful, trust, believe (pistos[G], ma’amiyn[H]).”
 
By first century Jewish measurement of time and according to Biblical time measurement the first and last days of a period are counted and therefore, “eight days later” means “a week later” in modern English. This is why the Jewish boy is circumcised on the eight day, which is one week from birth in accordance with the first day following the creation week.
 
Once again Yeshua appears in their midst, resurrected, transcendent, meta-physical.
 
Yeshua does not berate T’oma like some of our self-righteous scholars do but instead affords T’oma an opportunity to touch the evidence and encourages T’oma not to continue in disbelief.
 
 28 T’oma[H] (twin) answered and said to Him, “My Lord (Adoniy[H]) and my God (velohay[H])!” 29 Yeshua[H] said to him, “Because you have seen Me, you believe, trust, are persuaded (he’emaneta[H])? Happy (Makarios[G]) are they who did not see (eido[G]), and believe (hama’amiyniym[H]).”
 
T’oma says “Adoniy vElohay!” My Lord and My God! This is either the most heinous of blasphemies or Yeshua is God with us (Imanu-El) as the prophet promises (Isaiah 7:14). In order to determine which of the possibilities is true we must look at the response of Yeshua. Does Yeshua rebuke T’oma for blasphemy? Does Yeshua say, “I am your lord in a sense but I’m not God T’oma, be careful what you say.” NO, no and no! Yeshua says “Because you have seen Me you believe…” Believe what? That Yeshua is Lord and God.
 
Keep in mind what happened to Herod when the crowd later proclaimed concerning him, “This is the voice of God and not of a man!’ Immediately an angel of the Lord struck him, because he didn't give God the glory. He was eaten by worms and died.” (Acts 12:20-23). Therefore, if Yeshua were not God with us would the Angel of the Lord not also have struck Him down?
 
There are many implicit indications that Yeshua is Imanu-El (God with us), here is yet another allusion to Messiah as present manifest deity. Some Messianic Jewish scholars have said we should not be simplistic in calling Yeshua God, and to some degree this is true, He is God with us and is in the Father in Whom all things exist, however, nor should we be so subtle in our identification of Yeshua as God with us that we fail to convey the reality that only a fully God fully man Messiah is capable of fulfilling the promises of the prophets.
 
“Happy are they who did not see, and believe.” What a precious reassurance to all who have believed and all who will believe before He returns. I for one can testify to the happiness of belief in the yet to be seen Messiah Yeshua.
 
30 So then, many other miraculous signs (semeion[G],otot[H]) Yeshua[H] also worked in the presence of the disciples (talmidim[H]), which are not written in this book (baseipher[H]);
 
Yochanan the writer of this gospel makes it clear that his purpose in writing the gospel was not to detail every sign and wonder performed by Yeshua but rather to detail those aspects of Yeshua’s life and ministry which best revealed His eternal nature and redemptive role. Yochanan was aware that others had written more detailed gospels and that these were accessible to his readers.
 
31 but these have been written so that you may believe that Yeshua[H] is the Messiah (HaMashiach[H]), the Son of God (ho uihos ho Theos[G], HaBen HaElohim[H]) ; and that by believing (pisteuo[G], be’emunat’chem[H]) you may have living (chayiym[H]) in His Name (bish’mo[H]).
 
Ultimately Yochanan wrote his gospel “so that you may believe that Yeshua[H] is the Messiah, the Son of God; and that by believing you may have living in His Name.”
 
Some Greek manuscripts say “so that you may continue believing” while others say “so that you may, at a point in time, come to believe”. This has caused needless debate among scholars. Yochanan the Hebrew was thinking as a Hebrew and intended both meanings simultaneously, so that his gospel would continue to speak to both those who were believing and those who would believe. Once again we are afforded the opportunity to be set free from the false choices posed by Greco-Roman Western thinking Christian scholars. We choose “both and” rather than “this or that”. Seeking to know all is for the idolatrous, holding mystery in tension is for the courageous.
 
Copyright 2020 Yaakov Brown

1. What is your take on the cloud of witnesses mentioned in Hebrews 12, can we engage with them?
2. When Yeshua (Jesus) went to sheol (Holding place of the dead), did He preach to the dead or a specific order of captives?
3. It seems there is an emergence of tribal peoples throughout the world who are now claiming to be part of the 12 tribes of Israel. To date DNA testing has proven that these claims are erroneous. In addition, many Messianic believers who are Gentiles, and have no proven evidence of Jewish bloodline are wearing, Jewish Tallitot, Tzit tzit etc. Do you see this as another enemy tactic to dilute the unique ethno-religious identity of the Jewish people?
4. I hear people talking about the 10 lost tribes. Are there lost tribes?
5. I’ve heard it taught that women were uneducated in the first century CE And that this is why they weren’t allowed to teach in the early community of believers, is this true?
6. Could you explain the ancient Jewish Betrothal and Wedding practice?

1. What is your take on the cloud of witnesses mentioned in Hebrews 12, can we engage with them?

The allusion to the cloud of witnesses in Hebrews 12 is referring back to the list of those witnesses to God’s faithfulness who are listed in Hebrews 11, commonly known as the Faith Chapter. These witnesses, as can be seen from Hebrews 11, are the now deceased patriarchs and heroes of the Jewish faith. The writer of Hebrews, a Jew and a Cohen (Priest), knows that the witnesses he is referring to are deceased and that many of them are buried throughout the land of Israel, and that they are therefore uncontactable according to the teaching of Scripture regarding the dead (Hebrews 9:27).

In the parable of Lazarus and the Rich Man (Luke 16) Yeshua explains that while the dead are conscious, they are not able either to traverse the chasm between Gehinnom (torment) and Gan Eden (Paradise) nor (re: Lazarus etc. once they are finally deceased [Hebrews 9:27]) are they able to traverse the distance between Sheol and the present world. In my article on Saul, Samuel and the Witch of Eyndor, I explain why the events of 1 Samuel 28:3-21 are not describing the dead spirit of Samuel called up but rather an evil spirit that fools the witch and is used by God to condemn Saul. For further study please use the following link below:

http://www.bethmelekh.com/yaakovs-blog---14991514148914971493-15131500-1497150615111489/1-samuel-283-21-saul-and-the-witch-of-eyn-dor
​
The writer of the book of Hebrews is using the deceased Jewish witnesses of Hebrews 11 as a figurative example. When he says:

“Therefore, since we have such a great cloud of witnesses lying around us, let us also get rid of every weight and entangling sin. Let us run with endurance the race set before us, focusing on Yeshua, the author and perfecter of faith.” –Hebrews 12:1-2a
He is making a Drash (inquiry/comparative teaching) regarding how we should act in light of the figurative (not literal) cloud of witnesses that are buried throughout the land of Israel. We must remember that the writer is probably writing from the perspective of a priest living in the Land of Israel prior to the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE (AD). He then qualifies this teaching by instructing us, not to focus on the cloud of witnesses, but on Yeshua, the author and perfecter of our faith (The faith that our Jewish forebears shared in the coming Messiah Yeshua).

We cannot engage with this cloud of witnesses because they are deceased and according to Scripture (Hebrews 9:27) they are uncontactable. Those who do seek to speak to the dead are in fact speaking with demonic forces rather than the spirits of dead people (1 Timothy 4:1; 1 Corinthians 10:20-21; 2 Corinthians 11:14-15).

“Let no one be found among you who sacrifices his son or daughter in the fire, who practices divination or sorcery, interprets omens, engages in witchcraft, or casts spells, or who is a medium or spiritist or who consults the dead.” –Deuteronomy 18:10-12

Therefore, not only are we unable to engage with the dead witnesses of Hebrews 11-12, we are also commanded by God not to attempt to speak with the dead.

2. When Yeshua (Jesus) went to Sheol (Holding place of the dead), did He preach to the dead or to a specific order of captives?

The text this question refers to is 1 Peter 3:14-21:

“If you suffer for righteousness' sake, be glad: and don’t be afraid of their terror, neither be troubled; But sanctify (Kiddush) HaShem (Merciful) Elohiym (Judge) in your core being (heart): and be ready always to give an answer to every human being that asks you the reason for the hope that is in you with humility and reverent awe: Having a good conscience; that, whereas they speak evil of you, as of evildoers, they may be ashamed who falsely accuse your good conduct in Messiah. For it’s better if God’s will is that you suffer for doing well than for doing evil. For Messiah also at one time suffered for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, that He might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh but made alive in the Ruach (Spirit). By Whom (The Spirit) He also went and made proclamation to the ruachiym (spirits) in prison (phulake: foo-lak-ay). Who were formerly disobedient, when at one time the longsuffering God waited in the days of Noach (Comfort), while the ark was being prepared, in which a few, that is eight souls (nefesh) were saved by water (mikveh: gathering of water). This figurative likeness being a representation of the immersion (baptism) that now also saves us (not the washing of the flesh but the earnest seeking of a good conscience toward God) by the resurrection of Yeshua (Jesus) Messiah.”
 –1 Peter  3:17-21
 
In the context of Peter’s letter, the community of believers is being encouraged to share their faith with anyone who asks, and not to shy away from suffering if that is what God’s will entails. Peter then offers Yeshua as an example of One Who suffered and shared His message in the Spirit of God. It is explained that Yeshua’s suffering puts to death the sinful practices of the flesh and resurrects each believer in the life giving Spirit of God. It is by this same Spirit that the resurrected Messiah (not in sheol) transcends time and space, and thus traverses time and space by the Spirit, to proclaim His saving work to those spirits of human beings who were still living in the flesh at the time of Noah prior to the flood. The text explains that during the time of Noah only eight imprisoned spirits received Yeshua’s message and were delivered through the figurative tevilah immersion (baptism) of the flood, which the author shows to be a prefigure of the same tevilah immersion (baptism) that believers in Messiah have received unto salvation.

From the p’shat (plain) meaning of the text and the subsequent, remez (hint), drash (comparative) and sod (mystery), we see that it does not place Yeshua in sheol in relation to His proclamation but shows that it is by the Spirit of God following His resurrection that He spoke to the imprisoned spirits of humanity past. This text is not teaching anything even remotely to do with communicating with imprisoned dead people or angelic spirits. To the contrary, it simply teaches that God is just and that all humanity from Adam to the end of days has and will have an opportunity to either reject or receive the message of Messiah. This text shows how in the Spirit (of God), the resurrected Messiah transcends time and space and manifests the supernatural reality that He was both literally and figuratively slain before the foundation of the world (Revelation 13:8).

3. It seems there is an emergence of tribal peoples throughout the world who are now claiming to be part of the 12 tribes of Israel. To date DNA testing has proven that these claims are erroneous. In addition, many Messianic believers who are Gentiles, and have no proven evidence of Jewish bloodline are wearing, Jewish Tallits, Tzit tzit etc. Do you see this as another enemy tactic to dilute the unique ethno-religious identity of the Jewish people?  

Yes I do. Ethnic, empirical, religious Israel, the descendants of Yaakov (Jacob) have a unique role to play in history, past, present and future. The enemy Satan has consistently sought to either wipe out the ethnic identity of the Jewish people and or make her identity generic in a desperate attempt to resist the plans of God. Satan has done this through popular Christian theology, Supersessionism, Continuationism, British Israel, the Lost Tribes myth, to name a few, and is now doing it by utilizing well-meaning so called Messianic Gentiles who have come to believe the lie that their own culture is somehow less important than the Jewish culture.
 
Allow me to offer an example: I love the Maori people, the indigenous people of Aeotearoa (New Zealand), but I don’t have an ancestral Maori tattoo. I don’t have even an ounce of Maori blood in my body. I have Ashkenazi Jewish blood, Italian blood, South American blood, English blood, German blood, but not an ounce of Maori blood. Therefore I will not desecrate the Maori culture by getting a sacred Maori tattoo. The sacred elements of Maori culture belong to the Maori people and are an intrinsic part of their God given unique identity.
 
If you don’t have any Jewish blood, don’t attempt to steel our sacred God given identity. Those who are not Jewish but wear tzit tzit and kippot etc. or claim, erroneously that they are members of the house of Ephraim (their DNA proves otherwise), are doing the very thing they accuse the Replacement and Superssesionist theologians of doing. They are seeking to replace ethnic, empirical, religious Israel. It is sin, don’t become entangled in it! It not only defiles God’s chosen people, it also defiles you and your beautiful, unique ethnic identity.

4. I hear people talking about the 10 lost tribes. Are there lost tribes?  

There are no lost tribes. In approximately 540 BCE after the return of the tribes of Israel from exile in Babylon, all the tribes became united under the remnant of Judah who had remained in the land. Thus all Hebrews regardless of tribe took on the common title Yehudi (Jew), which became a term synonymous with Israel. From this point in time the Jewish people, consisting of the 12 tribes experienced various dispersions, the greatest of which occurred following the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE.
 
The biblical book of Yaakov (James) affirms this understanding when it refers to the “12 tribes scattered throughout the world.” In fact the Biblical book of Yaakov (James) was written specifically to the Jews (the twelve tribes of Israel).
 
There are specific DNA markers in the various groups of dispersed Jews throughout the world that offer irrefutable evidence of the various tribes within the Jewish nation. The terms Israelite and Jew have been synonymous since the sixth century BCE (BC).

5. I’ve heard it taught that Jewish women were uneducated in the first century CE (AD) And that this is why they weren’t allowed to teach in the early community of believers, is this true?  

This is simply not true. This foolish teaching finds very limited supported in the singular works of Ben Sira a Hellenistic Jewish scribe, sage, and allegorist from Jerusalem. His works contradict the wealth of Jewish tradition and teaching regarding women, and are often interpreted out of context. Women have been teachers, prophets and leaders of Israel throughout history. These include, Miriyam the sister of Moses, Ruth, Esther, Miriyam the mother of the Messiah, Devorah the prophetess etc.
 
Many are unaware that the ancient synagogues of Israel had no partitions separating men and women. The 2nd century Synagogue in Capernaum by the Galilee is a replica of the Synagogue that stood beneath it. I’ve stood there and seen for myself the open seating. In fact men and women sat together to listened to the Torah in the synagogues of first century Israel. How then could they have been uneducated?
 
From ancient times the women of Israel have been tasked with the greatest of teaching roles. That of teaching our children the core doctrines and practices of the Jewish faith. I ask then, if they were uneducated, how did they teach the Torah to countless generations of young Jews? How did they pass on the prayer tradition and Halakhah of Israel to subsequent generations?

6. Could you explain the ancient Jewish betrothal and wedding practice?  

There are many localized variations regarding minor themes concerning the ancient Jewish betrothal and marriage customs, however, the primary themes are consistent throughout Jewish history and practice, and continue to find a place of prominence in the modern Jewish wedding ceremony. I will answer this question by explaining the common primary themes of the ancient Jewish betrothal and marriage. They are themes that arise from both Scripture and tradition and have been perpetuated for thousands of years. They are a living allegory for the great mystery of God’s relationship to Israel (empirical, ethnic) and of the relationship between Messiah Yeshua and the Ecclesia (Messianic community of believers). As such, they transcend their temporal function and become a picture of our eternal hope as believers, in love relationship with God.

Much of the information that follows is taken from both Biblical and Talmudic sources. The information from Talmudic sources, while not codified until a much later date, does pass on an oral tradition dating back to a time long before the Messiah’s birth. Many of the Talmudic articles on the subject of marriage affirm the spiritual allegory attributed to Messiah and His bride and are therefore a valid commentary on the events that continue to transpire regarding the second coming of Yeshua our Mashiyach and Chatan (groom).

a.) SHIDUKHIN (ARRANGEMENT)—SELECTION OF THE BRIDE:

From ancient days it has always been the father of the groom who selects his son’s bride. In cases where it is not practical for the father to go to the home of the bride to arrange things, he sends a Shadkhan (arranger/matchmaker). This is exactly what happened in the case of Abraham’s selecting of a bride for his son Isaac:

“Avraham said to his servant (Eli-eytzer/My God is my helper, comforter), the oldest of his household, who had charge of all that he owned, ‘Please place your hand under my thigh, and I will make you swear by HaShem, the God of heaven and the God of earth, that you shall not take a wife for my son from the daughters of the Canaanites, among whom I live, but you will go to my country and to my relatives, and take a wife for my son Yitzchak.” –Genesis 24:2-4

The Scriptures remind us that we were chosen by The Father (God) from before the creation of the world:

“Just as He chose us in Him before the foundation of the world, that we would be holy and blameless before Him.” –Ephesians 1:4

Yeshua reminds us that:

“You did not choose Me but I chose you, and appointed you that you would go and bear fruit.” –Yochanan/John 15:16

b.) THE BRIDE MUST ACCEPT THE PROPOSAL:

In Jewish culture no woman may be forced to marry. Without the prospective brides acceptance of the marriage proposal there can be no marriage.
In Rebekah’s case, she had not seen her husband to be (Yitzchak), but accepted his proposal based on the word of the servant (Eli-eytzer, My God is a helper). This is also true of each of us who have accepted Yeshua’s proposal having had it offered to us at the hands of the Ruach Ha-Kodesh (Holy Spirit/The Helper).

“The servant said to him, ‘Suppose the woman is not willing to follow me to this land; should I take your son back to the land from where you came?’” –Genesis 24:5

“Then they called Rebekah and said to her, ‘Will you go with this man?’ And she said, ‘I will go.’” –Genesis 24:58

We must remember that it is Yeshua as the Jewish bridegroom (Chatan) Who always initiates the love relationship and that it is God Who selects us and not the other way around:

“We love Him because He first loved us.” –1 John 4:19

c.) THE MOHAR—BRIDE PRICE:

rom ancient times brides in Israel were purchased, a bride price (mohar) was paid as a means of showing that the groom valued the woman he was to marry. The price varied depending on the circumstances of those involved. In Yaakov’s (Jacob) case, he worked seven years as the bride price for Leah and Rachel respectively. (Genesis 29:20)
To the modern reader this may seem to denigrate women, treating them as property rather than valued equals, however, in the context of the Biblical society the opposite was true. The pagan nations surrounding Israel were taking women to wife without ceremony or consideration of a woman’s value. When a wife displeased a husband in these communities she was tossed aside and replaced without consequence, often left to fend for herself and in many cases to die without provision because men were the providers of a family’s income and protection.

The value placed upon a Jewish bride was a means of protecting her and valuing her as a person rather than an object of property for men to abuse. The fact that a husband, “owned,” his wife was not demeaning in the least, it was a sign to other men and to the bride, that she was cared for and valued. The Hebrew word for wife, Be’ulah, means, “owned,” and the Hebrew word for husband, Ba’al, means, “master or owner”.

“When Avraham’s servant heard their words, he bowed himself to the ground before HaShem. 53 The servant brought out articles of silver and articles of gold, and garments, and gave them to Rebekah; he also gave precious things to her brother and to her mother.” –Genesis 24:52-53

Yeshua has paid the highest price as a mohar for His bride by dying on the tree:

“You were bought with a price; do not become slaves of men.” –1 Corinthians 7:23

“(Yeshua) Who is given as a pledge of our inheritance, with a view to the redemption of God’s own possession, to the praise of His glory.” –Ephesians 1:14

“Knowing that you were not purchased with perishable things like silver or gold from your futile way of life inherited from your forefathers, 19 but with precious blood, as of a lamb unblemished and spotless, the blood of Messiah.” –1 Peter 1:18-19

“Or do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit Who is in you, Whom you have from God, and that you are not your own? For you have been bought with a mohar (price): therefore glorify God in your body.” –1 Corinthians 6:19-20

d.) KETUBAH (WRITTEN)/ EYRUSIN (BETROTHAL)/ KIDUSHIN (SANCTIFICATION):

Following the shidukhin (arrangement) by the father via his shadkhan (Matchmaker) the acceptance of the proposal by the bride and the offering of the gift by the groom; a binding covenant was entered into and a ketubah (written) document was signed. This process, known as both Eyrusin (betrothal) and kidushin (sanctification from Kadosh [Holy], meaning set apart), was conducted approximately one year prior to the actual marriage ceremony and was considered binding. So much so, that a divorce or get (Hebrew) must be obtained by the husband in order to dissolve the betrothal. It’s important to note that only a husband can initiate a get (divorce) [Deuteronomy 24:1-4].

This is an affirmation of eternal security for the believer. Our security is not dependent on us because we’re not able to break our engagement once we’ve entered into the agreement. Only the groom can break the betrothal and Yeshua has no intention of doing so:

“I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; no one will snatch them out of my hand. My Father, who has given them to me, is greater than all; no one can snatch them out of my Father’s hand. I and the Father are one.” –Yochanan/John 10:28-30

“If we are faithless, He remains faithful; He cannot disown Himself.” –2 Timothy 2:15

e.) MIKVEH (Immersion/Baptism):

Prior to the Eyrusin (Betrothal) rite, both the groom and the bride tevilah totally immerse themselves in a ritual bath (Mayim chayim—living water) of purification called a mikveh (Gathering of water). Yeshua was immersed by the forerunner Yochanan in preparation for His Eyrusin (Betrothal). Likewise as believers we enter into the mikveh of tevilah immersion (baptism) as a sign of our new beginning, identifying with Messiah’s immersion, His death and resurrection.
The mikveh is a symbol of a fresh start, a new beginning, a new family unit which is to be born of the married couple.
Following their tevilah (immersion) in the mikveh (gathering of water) the Eyrusin (Betrothal) ceremony took place under a Chuppah (canopy). In ancient times the Chuppah was a separate room in the groom’s father’s home, later the tradition of a canopy developed.

The Chuppah is a symbol of a new household and of God’s protective covering over the couple and their future progeny. It is also a sukkah (booth) which promises that God will one day Mishkhan (tabernacle, dwell) in the midst of His people for all eternity:

“As a bridegroom coming out of his chamber (Chuppah); rejoicing as a strong man to run his course.” –Tehillim/Psalm 19:5
“Gather the people, sanctify the congregation, assemble the elders, gather the children and the nursing infants. Let the bridegroom come out of his room (Chuppah) and the bride out of her bridal chamber (Chuppah).” –Yo’el/Joel 2:16

f.) THE CUP:

During the Eyrusin (Betrothal) ceremony gifts/rings are exchanged and a cup of wine is shared. The Kiddush (sanctification) cup used in this ceremony is kept to be used again at the wedding ceremony in a years’ time. In ancient times the cup was most likely made of hardened clay: today a thin wine glass is used.

On the night He was betrayed, Yeshua offered His bride to be (Israel—empirical, ethnic and the birthing Ecclesia), a new covenant in blood, a wine cup, a kiddush (sanctifying) cup. This cup, the third cup of the Pesach/Passover Seder, taken after the main meal, is called Kos Ge’ulah (cup of redemption):

“In the same way, after the supper he took the cup, saying, ‘This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you.’” –Luke 22:20

“’For I tell you I will not drink again from the fruit of the vine until the kingdom of God comes.’” –Luke 22:18

Following the Eyrusin (Betrothal) ceremony the couple is considered married in every way except for cohabitation and sexual relations. Both bride and groom live apart for approximately one year. Something similar is seen in the length of time between Rebekah’s acceptance of Isaac’s proposal and their marriage in Canaan sometime later.

The year was used by the groom as a time of preparation. It was traditional in the ancient Middle East for the groom to leave the bride’s home town and return to His father’s house where he would build a room onto his father’s dwelling that would serve as the couple’s chadar (wedding chamber) following their marriage ceremony. The parallels with Yeshua and His bride are obvious. Yeshua has gone to prepare a place for us:

“In My Father’s house are many dwelling places; if it were not so, I would have told you; for I go to prepare a place for you. If I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again and receive you to Myself, that where I am, there you may be also.” –Yochanan/John 14:2-3

Likewise, the bride spends the year in preparation for her groom’s return. She is to be ready at any hour of the day as the year draws to a close. She prepares items for her future home and a pure white dress for the wedding day.
We are reminded in the Scriptures that we should invest our time in those things which are eternal:

 “Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy, and where thieves break in and steal. But store up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys, and where thieves do not break in or steal;” –Mattitiyahu/Matthew 6:19

g.) THE RETURN OF THE GROOM:

Tradition dictates that only the father of the groom may decide on the time for the groom’s return, neither the groom nor the bride know at what hour the groom will return to carry the bride to the wedding feast.

“But of that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but the Father alone.” –Mark 13:32

In many cases, as the year of waiting drew to a close, the bride’s household would wait late into the night, keeping oil lamps lit in case of the groom’s return. This tradition became common among certain groups and is still practised in some communities today. The groom would often return at night.

“But at midnight there was a shout, ‘Behold, the bridegroom! Come out to meet him.’” –Mattitiyahu/Matthew 25:6

The implications for us as believers are clear, we are to prepare ourselves and be constantly ready for our groom’s return.

The groom would return, often late at night, with a procession of family and friends from his father’s household, shouting out, with torches burning and the shofar sounding to herald his coming.

“For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel and with the shofar of G-d, and the dead in Messiah will rise first. Then we who are alive and remain will be carried away (nisuin, to carry) together with them in the cloud (of His presence) to meet the Lord in the fresh air, and so we shall always be with the Lord.” –1 Thessalonians 4:16-17

The groom’s entourage would be carrying an aperion (a seated canopy, carried on the shoulders of men). He would pick up his bride and place her in the aperion thus carrying her away to her new home.

The bride would cover her face with a veil and intermittently along the way the groom would check under her veil to ensure he had carried away the right bride. This tradition is called bedeken and came about due to the problems experienced by Yaakov (Jacob) at the hands of Laban his father in law, when he deceived him on his wedding night by substituting Leah for Rachel.

There is a beautiful modern Hassidic practise among many Charediym (Orthodox/Pious) that combines both the night time arrival of the groom and the peeking behind the veil. It involves two men carrying Havdalah candles as they approach the bride walking arm in arm with the groom. They come with the groom at night and approach the betrothed woman’s home with the multi-wicked candles lit. The bride is veiled and awaiting the groom dressed in pure white. As the community chants traditional Hebrew songs, the groom is led by candle light to meet His bride, who is surrounded by her female attendants. Once the groom is standing before her, he unveils her face and leads her to the place where the wedding ceremony will take place.

h.) NISUIN (TO CARRY) THE CHUPPAH:

The Nisuin (Wedding) ceremony is the last stage of the betrothal and marriage. The Chuppah (canopy) was a specially made embroidered canopy or a tallit (prayer shawl) held up by four poles. It was representative of the bridal chamber.
The groom enters the proceedings first, as the rabbi calls out, “Baruch haba b’shem Adonai,” blessed is he who comes in the name of the L-rd. The groom stands on the left hand side, then the bride enters to the call, “B’rukhah haba’ah b’shem Adonai,” blessed is she who comes in the name of the Lord.

“O HaShem, do save, we beseech You; O HaShem, we beseech You, do send prosperity! Blessed is He who comes in the name of the HaShem; We have blessed you from the house of the HaShem. HaShem is Elohiym, and He has given us light; Bind the festival sacrifice with cords to the horns of the altar.” –Tehillim/Psalm 118:25-27

The bride walks around the groom either three or seven (depending on the local tradition) times as a symbol of her willingness to consecrate herself to her groom. Three times is symbolic of God’s three-fold betrothal to Israel:

“’I will betroth you to Me forever; Yes, I will betroth you to Me in righteousness and in justice (1), In loving kindness (chesed) and in compassion (2), And I will betroth you to Me in faithfulness (3). Then you will know HaShem [YHVH] (Mercy).’” –Hosea 2:19-20

Seven is a symbolic promise of the bridal week and the completeness found in marriage. Mirroring the completeness of the creation week and the Shabbat rest of God.

The bride then stands to the right of her groom.

i.) SHE’VA BRACHOT (Seven blessings):

​The She’va Brachot (seven blessings) are pronounced beginning with the blessing over the Kiddush cup (the same cup used during the Erusiyn betrothal rite), but the cup is not drunk until the blessings are completed. These blessings are also known as Birkat Nisuin (blessings of being carried away):

ברוך אתה ה' אלהינו מלך העולם, בורא פרי הגפן.
Transliteration: Barukh ata Adonai Eloheinu melekh ha olam, bo'rei p'ri hagafen.
Translation: "Blessed are You, HaShem, our God, sovereign of the universe, who creates the fruit of the vine."

ברוך אתה ה' אלהינו מלך העולם, שהכל ברא לכבודו.
Transliteration: Barukh ata Adonai Eloheinu melekh ha olam shehakol bara lichvodo.
Translation: "Blessed are You, HaShem, our God, sovereign of the universe, who created everything for His Glory."

ברוך אתה ה' אלהינו מלך העולם, יוצר האדם.
Transliteration: Barukh ata Adonai Eloheinu melekh ha olam, yotzer haa’dam.
Translation: "Blessed are You, HaShem, our God, sovereign of the universe, who creates man."

ברוך אתה ה' אלהינו מלך העולם, אשר יצר את האדם בצלמו, בצלם דמות תבניתו, והתקין לו ממנו בניין עדי עד. ברוך אתה ה', יוצר האדם.
Transliteration: Barukh ata Adonai Eloheinu melekh ha olam, asher yatzar et ha-adam b’tzalmo, b’tzelem d’mut tavnito, v’hitkin lo mimenu binyan adei ad. Baruch atah Adonai, yotzeir ha-adam.
Translation: "Blessed are You, HaShem, our God, sovereign of the universe, who creates humanity in your image (likeness), fashioning perpetuated life. Blessed are You, HaShem, creator of humanity."

שוש תשיש ותגל העקרה, בקיבוץ בניה לתוכה בשמחה. ברוך אתה ה', משמח ציון בבניה.
Transliteration: Sos tasis v’tageil ha-akara b’kibutz baneha l’tocha b’simcha. Baruch ata Adonai, m’sameach Tzion b’vaneha.
Translation: "May the barren one exult and be glad as her children are joyfully gathered to her. Blessed are You, Hashem, who gladden Zion with her Children."

שמח תשמח רעים האהובים, כשמחך יצירך בגן עדן מקדם. ברוך אתה ה', משמח חתן וכלה.
Transliteration: Sameiach tesamach reiim ha-ahuvim k’sameichacha y’tzircha b’gan eden mikedem. Baruch ata Adonai, m’sameiach chatan v’chalah.
Translation: "Grant perfect joy to these loving companions, as you did your creations in the Garden of Eden. Blessed are You, HaShem, who grants the joy of groom and bride."

ברוך אתה ה' אלהינו מלך העולם, אשר ברא ששון ושמחה, חתן וכלה, גילה רינה, דיצה וחדווה, אהבה ואחווה, ושלום ורעות, מהרה ה' אלקינו ישמע בערי יהודה ובחוצות ירושלים, קול ששון וקול שמחה, קול חתן וקול כלה, קול מצהלות חתנים מחופתם, ונערים ממשתה נגינתם. ברוך אתה ה', משמח חתן עם הכלה.
Transliteration: Baruch ata Adonai Eloheinu melech ha-olam, asher bara sason v’simcha chatan v’kallah, gilah rinah ditzah v’chedvah, ahavah v’achavah v’shalom v’reut. M’hera Adonai Eloheinu yishammah b’arei Yhudah uv-chutzot Y’rushalayim kol sason v’kol simcha, kol chatan v’kol kalah, kol mitzhalot chatanim meichupatam u-n'arim mimishte n’ginatam. Baruch ata Adonai, m’sameiach chatan im hakalah.
Translation: "Blessed are You, Hashem, our God, sovereign of the universe, who created joy and gladness, groom and bride, mirth, song, delight and rejoicing, love and harmony and peace and companionship. Soon, Hashem our God, may there ever be heard in the cities of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem voices of joy and gladness, voices of groom and bride, the jubilant voices of those joined in marriage under the bridal canopy, the voices of young people feasting and singing. Blessed are You, HaShem, who causes the groom to rejoice with his bride."

THE CUP #2:

Following the blessings the Kiddush cup (the same cup used in the Eyrusin ceremony of betrothal) is drunk by both groom and bride and is then wrapped in a napkin and shattered beneath the groom’s foot.

“For I tell you I will not drink again from the fruit of the vine until the kingdom of God comes.” –Luke 22:18

The breaking of the cup is a more recent addition to the ceremony but it holds great significance. Originally the rabbis added the shattering of the cup in order to remind those present that even in joyous times we remember the destruction of the temple and Israel’s suffering. However the symbolism is also powerfully representative of the fact that no one else can ever drink from the cup that the married couple have shared. The covenant of marriage is sacred and sealed forever in the sight of God. This is also the case regarding our marriage to Yeshua.

The marriage is then consummated in the bridal chamber (chadar), following which the groom calls out to the shadkhan (matchmaker) or friend of the groom, letting him know that the marriage has been consummated.

 “And Yeshua said unto them, ‘Can the attendants of the bride chamber mourn as long as the bridegroom is with them? But the days will come when the bridegroom shall be taken from them, and then shall they fast.’” –Mattitiyahu/Matthew 6:15

The couple then celebrates an elaborate wedding feast with their guests. The feast is followed by a seven day period together in seclusion, in order to complete the marriage week.

All of these events remind us of the Messianic community’s coming marriage to Yeshua. We will be carried away, and join with Him in spiritual marriage. He will finally drink again of the Kiddush cup with us and we will celebrate with Him at the wedding feast of the Lamb of God.

“’Let us rejoice and be glad and give the glory to Him, for the marriage of the Lamb has come and His bride has made herself ready.’ It was given to her to clothe herself in fine linen, bright and clean; for the fine linen is the righteous acts of the saints. Then he said to me, ‘Write, “Blessed are those who are invited to the marriage supper of the Lamb.”’ And he said to me, ‘These are true words of God.’” –Revelations 19:7-9

RENEWED COVENANT SCRIPTURES REGARDING BETROTHAL & MARRIAGE:

• Legally free to marry & purposed for fruit
“Therefore, my Jewish brothers and sisters, you also were made to die from the Torah’s perspective (regarding marriage to sin), through the body of Messiah, so that you might be joined to another, to Him who was raised from the dead, in order that we might bear fruit for God.” –Romans 7:4

We are dead to sin through the covenant blood of Messiah Yeshua and are therefore free to remarry. Yeshua is our groom and we marry for the purpose of bearing fruit.

• Shidukin (arrangement, match making)/ Eyrusin (betrothal)/ Ketubah (it is written)
“For I am jealous for you with a godly jealousy; for I have betrothed you to one husband, so that to Messiah I might present you as a pure virgin.” –2 Corinthians 11:2

In this text Shaul/Paul is the Shadkhan (match maker, arranger).

• Nisuin (to carry)/ Kidushin (Sanctification, from kadosh [Holy] set apart)—Marriage

“Wives, be subject to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, as Messiah also is the head of the Messianic Community, He Himself being the Saviour of the body. But as the Messianic Community is subject to Messiah, so also the wives ought to be to their husbands in everything. Husbands, love your wives, just as Messiah also loved the Messianic Community and gave Himself up for her (bride price), so that He might sanctify (Kidushin) her, having cleansed her by the washing of water (Mikveh) with the word, that He might present to Himself the Messianic Community in all her glory, having no spot or wrinkle or blemish; but that she would be holy (Set apart) and blameless. So husbands ought also to love their own wives as their own bodies. He who loves his own wife loves himself; for no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, just as Messiah also does the Messianic Community, because we are members of His body. ‘FOR THIS REASON A MAN SHALL LEAVE HIS FATHER AND MOTHER AND SHALL BE JOINED TO HIS WIFE, AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH.’ (Gen. 2:24) This mystery (sod) is great; but I am speaking with reference to Messiah and the Messianic Community.” –Ephesians 5:22-32

In this text Shaul/Paul uses the example of the Jewish betrothal and marriage (P’shat) to touch (Remez) on a much deeper understanding (Sod) of our relationship (Drash) with Yeshua. This mystery is in part available to all who understand the process of Jewish marriage from betrothal to the wedding chamber.
​
© Yaakov Brown 2017

The trust of Hebrews 11:1 is emunah (אמונה) whereas the trust of Proverbs 3:5-6 is b'tach (בטח). They have similarities but are different forms of trust. Emunah (אמונה) is trust completed outside of time and space, whereas b'tach (בטח) is the trust we apply within time and space in order to recieve the trust (emunah: אמונה) that transcends time and space. B'tach (בטח) is a temporary trust that must be chosen continually, it leads us to the eternal trust (emunah: אמונה) that continually chooses us.

Introduction:
In Rashi’s view the events of Chapter 18 follow directly on from the previous chapter, taking place three days after Avraham’s circumcision. I see no reason for disputing this. Even if understood as a tradition rather than an inspiration, Rashi’s idea adds to our understanding rather than detracting from it. If Rashi is correct, Avraham is now at the most painful stage of the healing process and is sitting, not only due to the heat of the day but also due to his need for rest and recovery.
​
As in the case of the previous events, this Divine encounter (theophany) and its outcome teach us a number of spiritual principles and further illuminate the character of G-d and the nature of humanity. The Holy Name of G-d YHVH, which denotes mercy, is used eleven times in this account (12 if the rabbinical interpretation of Adonai in verse 3 is accepted). This seems unusual given that the latter emphasis of the account is on the coming judgement against S’dom and Amorrah. However, it seems that G-d appears to Avraham as Mercy Himself for the purpose of conveying the idea that mercy triumphs over judgement. Avraham in turn, trusting the heart of G-d, becomes a type for the Messiah, pleading for justice seasoned with mercy, something that G-d intended all along.

With regard to Avraham and Sarah, a stark contrast is drawn between trust and disbelief. We are challenged by both Avraham’s eager hospitality and loving kindness, and by Sarah’s disbelief and denial.

When compared to chapter 19, this noon encounter stands in stark contrast to the night scene in Sodom. In the full light of midday G-d comes to Avraham for an intimate meeting of promise, sustenance, common unity and intercession. This is both a beginning and a counterpoint to the events of chapter 19, where in the darkness of night, an already condemned city establishes its wickedness by seeking to soil G-d’s messengers with acts of moral decay born of a depraved worldview, thus refusing intercession. The resulting destruction answers the loveless squalor of the citizens of S’dom and Amorrah, who have rejected G-d’s mercy outright. There is a correlation to Yeshua’s (Jesus) Revelation to Yochanan (John) here.

Verses 1-5 add nothing to the promises of 17:15. What differentiates the accounts is the intimate setting and the challenge to Sarah’s faith or lack thereof. The final result will be Sarah’s decision to trust G-d for the child, in response to His disciplining of her by way of a gentle challenge:

“By trust even Sarah herself received ability to conceive when she was barren and past the age, since she considered the One who had made the promise to be trustworthy.” – Hebrews 11:11

Gen 18:1 And HaShem (YHVH: Mercy) appeared to him (Avraham) at the trees of Mamrei (strength): and he (Avraham) sat in the tent door in the heat of the day;
 
What is clear from the outset is that HaShem Himself is appearing to Avraham. Regardless of how we interpret what follows, we must not lose sight of this fact. Accepting Rashi’s assertion, I see this scene set with the recovering Avraham seated at midday in the shade of his tent, still in a great deal of pain from having been obedient to G-d’s instruction to circumcise both himself and all the males of his household.
 
Whether we interpret, “the trees” or, “the plain” of Mamrei (strength), the result is the same. Having been obedient to G-d Avraham finds that in his weakness G-d is his strength.
 
“By trusting they conquered kingdoms, administered justice, obtained promises, shut the mouths of lions, quenched the power of fire, escaped the edge of the sword, were made strong out of weakness…” –Hebrews 11:33-34a
 
Gen 18:2 And he lifted up his eyes and looked, and, behold, three men stood by him: and when he saw them, he ran to meet them from the tent door, and prostrated himself on the ground,
 
“Lifted up his eyes” suggests that Avraham was either at rest or in prayerful meditation prior to this theophany (Divine visitation).
 
Avraham’s response to the appearance of the three men, whom he obviously sees as being representatives of The L-rd, is both courageous and reverential. Imagine getting up to run in the 45 degree (Celsius) plus heat of midday only three days after a painful operation on your private parts and then prostrating yourself before your guests, coming to rest on those very same parts in the hot sand. It’s safe to say, Avraham was extremely excited to see The L-rd and His messengers. This action shows the wonderful tension between friendship and awe in his relating to the Holy G-d. Avraham runs toward G-d and His messengers like a giddy school girl and then prostrates himself, an awe inspired servant.
 
It has been popular in Christian circles to try and affix the doctrine of the trinity to this meeting. However, it is clear from the remainder of this account (v.22) and the subsequent arrival of the two messengers at Sodom in 19:1, that at least two of the three men are not G-d.
 
Or HaChaim (Light of Life) suggests that G-d’s visit to Avraham in this instance was intended to demonstrate that Avraham had become a, “Chariot of the Divine Presence” (Bereshit Rabbah 82:6), meaning that Avraham’s physical being became a resting place for the Divine Presence of G-d (John 14:16-18; Romans 8:10, 15; James 4:5).
 
“I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Helper so He may be with you forever-- the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it does not behold Him or know Him. You know Him, because He abides with you and will be in you. I will not abandon you as orphans; I will come to you.” –Yochanan (John) 14:16-18
 
“Or do you think that in vain the Scripture says, ‘He yearns jealously over the Spirit which He made to dwell in us’”? –Yaakov (James) 4:5
 
Traditional rabbinic Judaism considers each of G-d’s angels to serve a specific purpose. Thus each angel (Messenger) is named for his function. The Midrash says, “One angel does not perform two missions”. Gur Aryeh explains Rashi’s view of the three angels, by providing the following names and functions:
 

1. Michael (Who is like G-d) – Function: Proclaims a miracle, informing Avraham that the all sufficient G-d will give Sarah a Son
2. Gavriel (Mighty one of G-d) – Function: Enacting Judgement, overturning Sodom (19:25)
3. Raphael (Healing of G-d) – Function: To Bring Wholeness. He is said to have healed Avraham of his circumcision wound and delivered Lot from Sodom, the two acts being part of making Avraham’s household whole, a single mission of rescue.

 
My personal view is that if we are to accept Rashi/Gur Aryeh’s view, we should swap the functions and order of the Malakhim (Angels) so as to match them to their well-documented Biblical roles and functions. Thus my list would read as follows:
 

1. Gavriel (Mighty one of G-d) – Function: Proclaims a miracle, informing Avraham that the all sufficient G-d will give Sarah a Son
2. Michael (Who is like G-d) – Function: Guardian of Israel, enacting Judgement, overturning Sodom (19:25)
3. Yeshua [Raphael] (Healing of G-d) – Function: To Bring Wholeness. He is said to have healed Avraham of his circumcision wound and delivered Lot from Sodom, the two acts being part of making Avraham’s household whole, a single mission of rescue.

 
Given that we know two of the men (angels) will depart for Sodom (19:1) leaving one angel to remain behind, and adding to this the fact that Avraham speaks to the remaining lord as if he were speaking directly to HaShem; it seems unlikely that the third angel was Raphael (an angel not mentioned directly in Scripture). However, the name Raphael, which is a composite of Rapha (Healing, wholeness, and rescue) and El (G-d), is certainly symbolic of the attribute of healing and wholeness in the G-d head. There is then a healing messenger of G-d Who comes to mind, being represented here as one of the three men, that is Yeshua our Messiah.
 
It is important to note that the Hebrew anashim meaning men is being used here to describe angelic beings. This is an opportunity to remind ourselves that the Hebrew malakh (angel) means, messenger.
 
Gen 18:3 And said, “My L-rd (Adonai: Master), if now I have found favour in Your eyes, please, don’t pass away from your servant:
 
Most rabbinical interpretations of this verse claim that the Hebrew Adonai used here in its standard form refers to YHVH, which is usually pronounced Adonai in respect for the Holy Name HaShem. Based on this view, HaShem: YHVH:Mercy, is referred to directly 12 times in total during this account.
 
Notice that Avraham rushes out to the three men but addresses only one of them, using the singular, “Adonai” (My lord). If he had intended to address all three as lord he would have said “Adonim”.
 
Gen 18:4 Please let a little water be fetched, and wash your feet, and rest yourselves under the tree:
 
The washing of the feet of weary travellers is a common Middle Eastern custom that has been practised by Jews and Arabs alike for thousands of years. It refreshes the entire body and in ancient times was usually performed by the lowliest servant in the household, however, it seems that Avraham’s intention was to wash the feet of the travellers himself, an act reminiscent of the Mashiyach (John 13:3-17).
 
Gen 18:5 And I’ll fetch a morsel of bread, and comfort your hearts; after that go on your way: for it is for this purpose that you’ve come to your servant”. And they said, “So do, as you have said”.
 
“I’ll fetch a morsel of bread” is a hospitable understatement given the feast that Avraham organizes for the three men. This is part of a rhythm of nomadic custom that is still practised today among Arab Bedouin and Mizrahi Jews. The Hebrew idiom, “comfort your hearts” uses lev in the traditional Hebrew sense to convey the centre of the being where all parts of the being converge. Thus the inference is that they might be refreshed in their entire being based on the complete performance of hospitable practice.
 
Notice that, “they” respond. This kind of interchangeable tense is familiar to theophany, as is the case in Jacob’s wrestling with the Angel of Hashem (Gen. 32) and the meeting the Angel of HaShem has with the parents of Samson (Judges 13). We must not lose sight of the fact that we have significant clues within the text (v.22, 19:1) that allow us to deduct which of the three is being called lord and who the remaining two are.
 
Michael (Who is like G-d) is known in Scripture as the arch angel who guards Israel and is representative of G-d’s might. He is a warrior messenger (Daniel 10:13, 21; 12:1, Jude 1:9, Rev. 12:7). It seems that he plays a similar role here (Chapter. 19) in protecting Lot, while Gavriel (Mighty one of G-d), who is known in Scripture as a herald of G-d (Daniel 8:16; 9:21, Luke 1:19, 26) is seen here proclaiming blessing for Avraham and then enforcing G-d’s judgement against the people of S’dom and Amorrah. Notice that in the book of Daniel both angels are associated with G-d’s proclamation of blessing for Israel and His judgement against His enemies.
 
Gen 18:6 And Avraham (Father of a Multitude) hastened into the tent to Sarah (Princess, Noble woman), and said, “Make ready quickly three measures of fine meal, knead it, and make round bread upon the hearth (convex metal surface)”.
 
The first thing we observe is the speed with which Avraham operates in order to care for his guests. Second, we see that Avraham does not instruct Sarah to add yeast to the bread, therefore, this is maztot (unleavened bread). It is from this verse and the subsequent reference in 19:3 that the rabbis’ determine that this was the season of Pesach (Passover) and that Avraham was prophetically observing the future deliverance of his progeny. This text was written down by Moses at Sinai following Israel’s first Pesach. Thus the attention to detail with regard to the type of bread being prepared in this story is intended by the author to draw the reader’s attention to this particular season in the Jewish religious year.
 
The three men, three measures of fine meal and the three days since Avraham’s circumcision all point to an established promise of G-d. The son that is to come has been firmly established and as has the judgement that is to come against the wickedness of S’dom and Amorrah. While the complex unity of G-d is not present in the plain meaning of the text, it is revealed in the remez (hint) of symbolic Biblical numerology. The number three reminding us of the Father (Av), Son (Ben) and Holy Spirit (Ruach Ha-Kodesh).
 
Gen 18:7 And Avraham ran to the herd, and fetched a calf tender and good, and gave it to a young man; and he rushed to prepare it.
 
Avraham is close to 100 years old and still recovering from circumcision, and yet he personally runs to select a calf for his guests. He had any number of servants he could have called upon to perform this act, however, these three men were extremely important to him. In particular, one of the men is G-d with us, the manifest humanoid form of that person of the One G-d we know to be, the Angel of HaShem, The Healer, the Son.
 
“Do not neglect to show hospitality to strangers—for in doing so, some have entertained angels (Messengers) without knowing it.” –Hebrews 13:2
 
“For I was hungry and you gave Me something to eat; I was thirsty and you gave Me something to drink; I was a stranger and you invited Me in;” –Mattitiyahu (Matthew) 25:35 (TLV)
 
Gen 18:8 And he took butter, and milk, and the calf which he had prepared, and set it before them; and he stood by them under the trees, and they ate.
 
The custom of standing by while guests eat their fill is still practiced today in many Middle Eastern homes and among the Arab Bedouin and Mizrahi Jews.
 
They were eating beneath the trees of Mamrei (strength). The strength of G-d had formed a canopy over Avraham in his weakness and his longing for an heir. In his weakness Avraham placed his trust in G-d’s strength.
 
Gen 18:9 And they said to him, “Where is Sarah your wife?” And he said, “Behold, in the tent.”
 
Here, “they” speak, asking after Sarah. However, in the following verse, “He” speaks the promise. G-d knows where Sarah is, He need not ask. He asks, all be it through His Angel, in order to show Avraham His desire for relationship with the entire household, beginning with Sarah.
 
Gen 18:10 And He said, “I will certainly return to you according to the time of life (season); and, behold, Sarah your wife shall have a son.” And Sarah heard from inside the tent door, which was behind him.
 
The, “He” here is clearly not Avraham because the words are being spoken as a promise to Avraham concerning his wife Sarah and the birth of Isaac. Nor is it, “they” speaking together. So who is left? HaShem appeared to Avraham at the beginning of the encounter and has not left. So too the three men arrived and have not left. Therefore the speaker here is one of the three men and is also a manifestation of the person of G-d (18:14). Only one individual in all of Biblical history fits this description, Yeshua the Messiah, Emmanuel (G-d with us).
 
Sarah, being modest, had stayed within the tent according to protocol, but was listening intently to the conversation of the men outside. The man speaking to Avraham has His back to Sarah.
 
Gen 18:11 Now Avraham and Sarah were old and well stricken in age; and it ceased to be with Sarah after the manner of women (She had already experienced menopause).
Gen 18:12 Therefore Sarah laughed within herself, saying, “After I am waxed old shall I have fine skin (a return of fertility), my lord (husband) being old also?”
 
What is clear from Sarah’s response is that either Avraham hadn’t told her of the promise of the child or he had told her and she had maintained disbelief. Either way she responds here in a way that emphasizes her doubt, laughing out of a place of mistrust. Where Avraham laughed in joyous awe asking, “How will this occur?” thus inviting the probability, Sarah laughs in disbelief asking, “Shall it occur?” thus denying the possibility. Notice that Sarah laughs within, her words are thoughts contained in her inner being, no one could have known how she responded unless they could see into her core being. Only G-d is truly capable of this. Picture then the awesome scene that follows when the man responds to Sarah’s inner musings.
 
According to both Radak and Sforno, Sarah believed that such a radical rejuvenation was as impossible a miracle as the raising of the dead. This is interesting given the fact that Isaac, who is later to be offered by Avraham in sacrifice and then saved by the Ram (A type for Messiah: Genesis 22), is spoken of in the book of Hebrews in relationship to trust in the Messiah Yeshua, Who was raised from the dead for our redemption.
 
“He (Avraham) reasoned that God was able to raise him (Isaac) up even from the dead—and in a sense, he did receive him back from the dead.” –Hebrews 11:19
 
Gen 18:13 And HaShem (YHVH: Mercy) said to Avraham, “Why did Sarah laugh, saying, ‘Shall I be certain that I’ll bear a child, when I’m old’?”
Gen 18:14 Is anything too hard for HaShem (YHVH: Mercy)? At the time appointed I will return unto you, according to the time of life (season), and Sarah shall have a son.
 
Avraham is perhaps thinking, “What laughter? I didn’t hear her laugh or say anything?” In turn Sarah is probably thinking, “How is it possible that this man knows my inner thoughts?”
 
We note here that it is HaShem who has heard Sarah and that it is He Who will return in a year’s time at this season (Pesach) to witness the birth of the son.
 
With the words, “Is anything too hard for HaShem” G-d challenges Sarah’s unbelief (mistrust).
 
 Gen 18:15 Then Sarah denied it, saying, “I didn’t laugh”; for she was afraid. And He said, “Not so; you did laugh.”
 
Sarah, now caught in her disbelief and being fearful of G-d, choses to lie rather than confess. However, G-d, Who is present in mercy (YHVH), disciplines Sarah as a beloved child, refuting her lie with the simple statement, “Not so; you did laugh”. Here, “laugh” is synonymous with, “doubt”. Therefore, we can read, “Not so; you did doubt”.
 
Remember that up to this point the man (G-d with us) has had His back turned to Sarah, now He turns to look her in the eye and gently challenge her unbelief.
 
We know that Sarah took HaShem’s challenge to heart because she eventually found trust in HaShem, and considering Him trustworthy, believed she would give birth to the promised child.
 
“By trust even Sarah herself received ability to conceive when she was barren and past the age, since she considered the One who had made the promise to be trustworthy.” – Hebrews 11:11
 
It is also worth noting here the similarities between the birth of Isaac and the later birth of the Messiah. The Ram which delivers Isaac in Genesis 22 is a type for the Messiah and his sacrificial death and His resurrection. Thus, when we see the proclamation to Sarah, we also hear the proclamation to Miriyam (Mary). When we hear of the miraculous birth that is to take place, we’re also reminded of the miraculous birth of our Messiah. When we see the two angels that accompany G-d with us (Emmanuel: the third man), we also think of the angel that visited Miriyam (Mary) and the angel who brought a legion of angels to announce the Messiah’s birth to the shepherds of Israel’s sacrificial flocks.
 
Gen 18:16 And the men rose up from there, and turned their faces toward S’dom (burning): and Avraham walked with them on the way.
 
We know that two of the three men arrived in S’dom, named as messengers (malakhim: angels) 19:1.
 
It seems that Avraham, went with the men for part of their journey as they began to head toward S’dom.
 
Gen 18:17 And HaShem (YHVH: Mercy) said, “Shall I hide from Avraham the thing which I am doing; Gen 18:18 seeing that Avraham shall surely become a great and mighty nation, and all the nations of the earth shall be blessed in him? Gen 18:19 For I know him, that he will command his children and his household after him, and they shall keep the way of HaShem (YHVH: Mercy), to do justice and judgment; that HaShem (YHVH: Mercy) may bring upon Avraham that which He has spoken of him.”
 
This conversation seems to be taking place between HaShem and the men (angels). Given our former deduction regarding Who the third man is, we can suggest that G-d with us (Yeshua), the third man, is conversing with Michael and Gavriel. These two angels already know what G-d has instructed them to do in S’dom, thus, for the reader’s sake the text alludes to a sort of legal tribunal being conducted in line with the attributes of mercy, justice and judgement, which are the attributes G-d is trusting Avraham to pass on to his offspring. This therefore is the reason for the consultation and the subsequent opportunity for Avraham to offer a righteous argument for the consolation of justice and mercy. Not because G-d is unjust or unmerciful but because G-d has imparted His attributes to Avraham a heart of mercy and justice which will be a light to the nations.
 
“Shall I hide” infers a friendship between G-d and Avraham (Isaiah 41:8). Yeshua illuminates the relationship between G-d and His servants when He says:
 
“I am no longer calling you servants, for the servant does not know what his master is doing. Now I have called you friends, because everything I have heard from My Father I have made known to you.” –Yochanan (John) 15:15 (TLV)
 
This friendship is further emphasized by the phrase, “I know him” the Hebrew, “yada” denoting intimate knowledge of a person. In this case it is a knowledge that transcends time and space, an observation of the present eternity spoken into time and space in this conversation between G-d and the angels. In other words, G-d has already seen Avraham’s future righteousness and is speaking it into time and space.
 
Gen 18:20 And HaShem (YHVH: Mercy) said, “Because the cry of S’dom (Burning) and Amorrah (Submersion) is great, and because their sin is very grievous;
 
Ibn Ezra notes that the, “Outcry” is either the outcry of the rebellion of the Sodomites or the outcry of those who had suffered as a result of the evil conduct of the Sodomites. Rambam claims that it is the cry of the oppressed looking for liberation.
 
The opinion of the Jewish sages is that the cruelty of S’dom stemmed from the maxim, “What is mine is mine and what is yours is yours” (Avot 5:10). A similar modern idiom says, “Neither a borrower or a lender be”. Both colloquialisms offer the pretence inherent in worldly wisdom but directly oppose the charitable mission of G-d’s people.
 
Gen 18:21 I will descend, and inspect what they have done according to the outcry, which is come unto me; and if not, I will know (I will be known).”
 
“I will descend” is for the sake of the human audience. G-d uses kinetic terms to convey a sense of His present action within time and space, however, He remains invisible and immutable, existing outside of all things, the eternal G-d.
 
G-d, within Whom all things exist and have their being, need not descend. Additionally, G-d with us (Emmanuel), the angel, will descend. The inspection of S’dom is intended to emphasize the judicial nature of this judgement. S’dom is being given a just and fair trial, her destruction will not be without merit.
 
The phrase, “And if not, I will know (yada)” may mean, “If they repent, I will know (yada) them” or, “I will be known by them”.
 
Gen 18:22 And the men turned their faces from there, and went toward S’dom: but Avraham remained standing before HaShem (YHVH: Mercy).
 
The present reading of verse 22 is according to the Masoretic scribal correction of the text. Possibly intended to avoid conjecture over the position of Avraham in relation to G-d. However, there is a good case for reading the original Hebrew as, “but HaShem remained standing before Avraham”. This reading qualifies the former correlation between the manifestation of G-d in humanoid form and the third man (angel). Regardless, only two men (angels) arrive at S’dom (19:1), leaving the third to remain. Thus it is the L-rd with us (Emmanuel) as the man (angel) Who remains standing before Avraham, or if you like, before Whom Avraham stands.
 
Gen 18:23 And Avraham drew near (nagash: an intimate closeness), and said, “Will You also destroy the righteous with the wicked?”
  
Avraham now draws near, an intimate positioning of himself close to the third man, face to face. This is the intense relational context of the conversation that follows.
 
In the previous chapter Avraham had received his new name and had become the Father of the nations. He takes this role seriously by drawing near to G-d as an intermediary on behalf of the people of S’dom and the surrounding cities who will be destroyed by the ensuing destruction brought about by G-d’s righteous judgement. G-d has placed in him the desire to see justice tempered with mercy. Thus the G-d of mercy is seen at work within the heart of His servant.
 
Avraham had intervened on S’dom’s behalf in the past (Genesis 14:14) for the sake of his nephew Lot. His continued concern and deep connection to his nephew can be heard in his pleading for mercy.
 
Gen 18:24 “What if there were fifty righteous within the midst of the terror (the city): will You also destroy and not spare the place for the fifty righteous that are there?

“So it was, as God destroyed the cities of the surrounding area, that God remembered Abraham, and sent Lot out of the midst of the upheaval, when He demolished the cities where Lot had dwelt.” –Bereishit (Genesis) 19:29 (TLV)
 
Based on Genesis 19:29 Rashi suggests that all five of the cities mentioned in Genesis 14:2 are to be condemned in the judgement against S’dom. Thus the plea for the holding back of judgement on account of 50 righteous ones is in fact a plea for 10 (a quorum for worship/prayer—minion) from each of the five condemned cities. This infers that the number of righteous is related to the potential for their faithful worship of G-d, to have a redemptive effect upon those around them and thus cause the cities to repent and turn away from evil. This is consistent with the continual use of the Holy Name YHVH: mercy, throughout the chapter.
 
Gen 18:25 That be far from You to do after this manner, to slay the righteous with the wicked: and that the righteous should be as the wicked, that be far from You: Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right?”
 
Simply put Avraham is saying, “It is not in Your Character to punish the righteous with the wicked”. In other words, “that be far from You” means, “It’s not Who You are”. Additionally, “Shall not the Judge of all the earth do right?” is rhetorical and best understood to mean, “I know that the Judge of the earth will do what is right”.
 
Gen 18:26 And HaShem (YHVH: Mercy) said, “If I find in S’dom fifty righteous within the city, then I will spare all the place for their sakes.”
 
The key phrase here is, “within the city” which means inside the walls, in the midst of the evil behaviour.
 
Gen 18:27 And Avraham answered and said, “Behold now, I have taken it upon myself to speak unto HaShem (YHVH: Mercy), although I am but dust and ashes: Gen 18:28 If there are five less than fifty righteous: will You destroy all the city for lack of five? And He said, “If I find there forty five, I will not destroy it.”
 
Notice the humility and respect Avraham pays to G-d as he continues to petition Him for mercy. Given the inference in the Holy Name we could read, “I have taken it upon myself to speak unto Mercy”. Rashi notes according to the Midrash that even with five subtracted from the number of the righteous each city would still have nine and G-d would become the tenth member of the quorum for worship and prayer.
 
Gen 18:29 And he spoke to Him yet again, and said, “ If there are forty found there?” And He said, “I will not do it for forty's sake.” Gen 18:30 And he said unto him, “Oh let not my Lord (Adonai) be angry, and I will speak: if there are thirty found there?” And He said, “I will not do it, if I find thirty there.” Gen 18:31 And he said, “Behold now, I have taken upon me to speak unto my Lord (Adonai): If there were twenty found there?” And He said, “I will not destroy it for twenty's sake.” Gen 18:32 And he said, “Oh let not my Lord (Adonai) be angry, and I will speak but once more: if ten are found there?” And He said, “I will not destroy it for ten's sake.
 
We might be tempted to see this dialogue as some sort of haggling over the judgement of the people of S’dom, however, that is not what’s happening. This dialogue between Avraham the advocate and G-d the Merciful Judge is intended to express G-d’s desire to see all come to a saving knowledge of Him (1 Timothy 2:3-5). Avraham is acting as a type for the then future coming of the Messiah, the greatest advocate of all time. One of the key evidences for this being a conversation of friendship, or of Teacher and disciple, is the fact that G-d does not respond with a counter to Avraham’s requests, He simply concedes to each of Avraham’s demands until at last Avraham learns that G-d has shown great mercy already and that the refusal of the wicked to accept G-d’s mercy is the vehicle of their own demise.
 
The petitioning for mercy ends at the number 10, the number for a single complete quorum of worship and prayer or alternatively, 2 people in each of the five condemned cities grouped together with S’dom and Amorrah. It is interesting to note that Yeshua seems to have used the traditional rabbinical requirement for a quorum of ten as a platform for conveying the reality that G-d is present and active even when two are gathered in His Name (Matthew 18:20).
 
Gen 18:33 And HaShem (YHVH: Mercy) went His way (departed), as soon as he had finished communing with Avraham: and Avraham returned unto his place.
 
G-d didn’t leave until Avraham had finished petitioning Him. This, in and of itself is a clear representation of G-d’s merciful character. Because G-d is everywhere in the sense that all things are in Him, He cannot leave or depart from Himself. However, as explained previously, in order for human beings to read relational interaction in this encounter, kinetic language must be used to convey the tangible sense of relationship that Avraham experienced with G-d. Additionally, the third man still had to depart and did not arrive at S’dom in 19:1, therefore G-d with us (Yeshua), the man (angel), departed.
 
Avraham returned to his place because he had previously left with the three men toward S’dom and then stopped at a point on the way where he continued to speak with G-d while the two angels (Michael and Gavriel) went to S’dom. He now returned to his tents at the trees of Mamrei.
 
My daughter’s teachers ask them to put what they term a, “hook” in their essay writing. A repeated phrase, an idea that reconciles each element of the essay. If there is a hook in this theophany, it is this, “Mercy triumphs over judgement”.
 
“So speak and act as those who will be judged according to a Torah that gives freedom. For judgment is merciless to the one who does not show mercy. Mercy triumphs over judgment.” –Yaakov (James) 2:12-13 (TLV)
  
© Yaakov brown 2016