A believer may become tired as a result of the role he plays in ministry, however, he must not become weary. Weariness is not a state of physical, emotional or mental tiredness but a way of thinking about that tiredness. Better to say, “I’m tired as a result of the work, I need to rest” rather than say, “I’m weary of all this, I’m done”. Likewise relaxation can become a counterfeit of rest. Where rest restores, vain relaxation can produce laziness. Introduction & Summary:
The first century Jewish recipients of this work, along with all who receive Messiah, are now encouraged, based on the repentant faith of our forebears (the faithful witnesses listed in Hebrews 11), to turn our backs on the sin that has entangled us and commit ourselves to running the race first set before us regardless of whether the part we personally play involves victorious miracles or life threatening hardships. “For we are his workmanship, created in Messiah Yeshua for good works, which God has prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them.” -Ephesians 2:10 (Author’s translation) We are to focus our vision on Yeshua the King Messiah, Who is both the Originator and Perfecter, the Author and Goal of faith, and follow His example. He looked to the Joy that would result from His finished work and chose to suffer death on a Roman cross, His body exposed and nailed, He had contempt not only for the shame He suffered but also for shame itself, and as a result He returned to His place in the right hand of authority of the God. Based on this example we are encouraged not to lose heart. The writer of Hebrews goes on to admonish us with the sobering observation that we have not yet resisted sin to the point of bloodshed (death), and that we are prone to forget who we are in Messiah. We are sons and daughters who suffer in this temporal life for many reasons, one of which is discipline. If we were not experiencing discipline as part of our journey we would be illegitimate sons and daughters, for God disciplines His children for good, so that we might share in His holiness. While discipline is unpleasant in the moment, it nonetheless produces in those who are trained by it, peace, the fruit of righteousness. The final direction of the first 17 verses involves us strengthening one another. We are told to make straight, clear paths for ourselves and our fellow believers so that those who have been injured might be restored to spiritual health without the added danger of obstacles that litter the path (way) before them, rocks that might cause them to stumble and thus aggravate the injuries they have suffered. In addition to the well-being of the family of Messiah, we are also encouraged to seek peace (as much as it depends on us) with others, and to chase after holiness. Chasing after holiness is the metaphysical fruit of focusing on Yeshua, Who defines holiness in God. We are warned to keep a look out for those things among us that might cause divisions as a result of rebellion and grudge holding. Holding a grudge is evidence of our failure to carry and exhibit the grace of God. We are to mitigate conflict before it reaches the point of causing division. Division of this kind defiles the body of believers. We are not to allow the intentionally sexually immoral person to remain in our midst. Those who perpetuate a sexually immoral lifestyle are synonymous with the godless. Esau’s despising of his birth right (a gift from God) is used as an example of the kind of fruit that is evidence of such people. Esau traded this precious gift for the momentary satisfying of his carnal hunger. The birth right is used here as a metaphor for eternal life. In short, the writer is warning us against turning our back on our birth right in Messiah as a result of focusing on the temporal pleasures of this life. If we sin we are to repent rather than act as Esau did, who wept and regretted but did not repent (initially). Previous verses: 37 They were stoned, they were sawn in two, they were tempted, examined, proved, they were put to death with the sword; they went about in sheepskins, in goatskins, being destitute, afflicted, tormented 38 (people of whom the world was not worthy), wandering in deserts, on mountains, and sheltering in caves and holes in the ground. 39 And all these, having gained a good report upon their faith, did not receive what was promised, messaged, 40 because the God had provided something better for us, so that apart from us they would not be made perfect, complete, consecrated. HEBREWS 12:1-17 (Author’s translation) 1Therefore (based on what I’ve just said and going forward), since we also are surrounded by such a great, numerous cloud, multitude of vapor, of witnesses, martyrs, kiydush HaShem[H] [sanctifiers of the Name YHVH) [the ones I listed, who are interred (buried) all over the land of Israel, their bodies literally surrounding us], let’s rid ourselves of, put off, lay aside every weight, burden, encumbrance, obstacle and the sin, the missing of the mark set by God’s holiness, which so easily entangles us, and let’s run with patient endurance the race that is first, set before us, 2 looking only at, into, on, among Yeshua[H], the Originator, Author, Prince, Captain, Chief, and Perfecter, Completer, Consummator of the faith, trust, ongoing belief. Who for the transcendent joy set before Him endured the cross, despising, looking with distain upon, having contempt for the shame, and has sat down in the right hand of the throne of God. 3 For consider, contemplate, ponder, think on Him who has endured such hostility by sinners, those fading away, against Himself, so that you will not grow weary and faint, exhausted, relaxed, weakened, despondent in your heart, soul, mind, breath, life. 4 You have not yet resisted to the point of shedding blood in your struggle against sin, missing the mark set by God’s holiness; 5 and you have forgotten the exhortation, consolation, entreaty which is addressed to you as sons and daughters, children, “My son, do not despise the discipline, instruction of the Lord, Nor faint, relax, be weakened, become exhausted when you are rebuked by Him; 6 For whom the Lord has all-encompassing love for He disciplines, teaches And He scourges, flogs every son whom He accepts, receives, delights in.” [Prov. 3:11,12 (ref. LXX)] A literal translation of the Hebrew text of Mishlei (Proverbs) 3:11-12:“The discipline of the LORD my son do not despise, don’t be wearied by His correction. For those who are loved by the LORD He proves as a father does the son in whom he delights.” 7 For in as much as you endure the discipline, nurturing, chastening; the God offers it to you as to sons; for what son is there who is not disciplined, taught by his father? 8 But if you are without discipline, nurturing, chastening of which all have become partakers, partners then you are illegitimate children and not sons. 9 Furthermore, additionally, we had earthly fathers (fathers of the flesh) who corrected, instructed, disciplined us, and we respected them; shall we not much more be subject to the Father of spirits, winds, life and continue living? 10 For they disciplined, instructed, taught us for a short time as seemed best to them, but He for better, good, corporate well-being so that we may be partners, partakers in His holiness. 11 Now, all discipline, nurturing, chastening for the present seems not to be joyful, but painful, heavy, grievous; nevertheless afterward, at last it yields, pays, delivers the peaceful fruit of righteousness in those who have been trained by it, 12 Therefore (because you understand the reason for the discipline), lift up the hands that hang down (are growing weary) and strengthen the knees that are feeble, 13 and make straight, upright paths for your feet, so that the limb which is impaired may not be dislocated, but rather be healed, made whole. 14 Pursue peace with all individually and collectively, and the holiness, sanctification without which no one will see the Lord. 15 look diligently, forbid everyone from coming short of the grace of the God; forbid any root of bitterness, poison from springing up to cause trouble, and by it many become defiled; 16 Forbid any sexually immoral or godless person like Esav[H], who sold his own birth-right for a single meal. 17 For you know that even afterward, when he wanted to inherit the blessing, he was rejected, disallowed for he found no place, room, opportunity for repentance, though he sought for it with tears. HEBREWS 12:1-17 (line upon line) 1 Therefore (based on what I’ve just said and going forward), since we also are surrounded (perikeimai[G]) by such a great, numerous (tosoutos[G], hamon[H]) cloud, multitude of vapor (nephos[G]) of witnesses, martyrs, kiydush HaShem[H] [sanctifiers of the Name YHVH) (martus[G], eidiym[H]) [the ones I listed, who are interred (buried) all over the land of Israel, their bodies literally surrounding us], let’s rid ourselves of, put off, lay aside (apotithēmi[G]) every weight, burden, encumbrance, obstacle (ogkos[G]) and the sin, the missing of the mark set by God’s holiness (hamartia[G]) which so easily entangles (euperistatos[G]) us, and let’s run with patient endurance (hupomonē[G]) the race that is first, set before (prokeimai[G], lefaneiynu[H]) us, 1Therefore (based on what I’ve just said and going forward), since we also are surrounded by such a great, numerous cloud, multitude of vapor, of witnesses, martyrs, kiydush HaShem[H] [sanctifiers of the Name YHVH) [the ones I listed, who are interred (buried) all over the land of Israel, their bodies literally surrounding us], let’s rid ourselves of, put off, lay aside every weight, burden, encumbrance, obstacle and the sin, the missing of the mark set by God’s holiness, which so easily entangles us, and let’s run with patient endurance the race that is first, set before us, The allusion to the cloud of witnesses in Hebrews 12 refers us back to the list of those witnesses to God’s faithfulness who are recorded in Hebrews 11. Cloud is a common metaphor for a crowd in ancient Greek literature. Therefore, the modern reader can understand this verse to say “Therefore, since we have such a great crowd of witnesses…” These witnesses, as can be seen from Hebrews 11, are the now deceased patriarchs and heroes of the Jewish faith. The writer of Hebrews, a Jew and a Kohen (Priest), knows that the witnesses he is referring to are deceased and that many of them are buried (interred) throughout the land of Israel, literally surrounding the Jewish recipients of this work, and that they are therefore uncontactable according to his own teaching (inspired by the Holy Spirit) regarding the dead (Hebrews 9:27). In the parable of Lazarus and the Rich Man (Luke 16) Yeshua explains that while the dead are conscious, they are not able either to traverse the chasm between Gehinnom (torment) and Gan Eden (Paradise) nor (re: Lazarus etc. once they are finally deceased [Hebrews 9:27]) are they able to traverse the distance between Sheol and the present world. In my article on Saul, Samuel and the Witch of Eyndor, I explain why the events of 1 Samuel 28:3-21 are not describing the dead spirit of Samuel called up but rather an evil spirit that fools the witch and is used by God to condemn Saul. For further study please use the following link: http://www.bethmelekh.com/yaakovs-blog---14991514148914971493-15131500-1497150615111489/1-samuel-283-21-saul-and-the-witch-of-eyn-dor The writer of the book of Hebrews is using the deceased Jewish witnesses of Hebrews 11 as a figurative example. When he says: “Therefore, since we have such a great cloud of witnesses lying around us, let us also get rid of every weight and entangling sin. Let us run with endurance the race set before us, focusing on Yeshua, the author and perfecter of faith.” –Hebrews 12:1-2a He is making a drash (inquiry/comparative teaching) regarding how we should act in light of the figurative (not literal) cloud of witnesses that are buried (interred) throughout the land of Israel. We are to live the same kind of repentant faith that our forebears lived. We must remember that the writer is probably writing from the perspective of a priest living in the Land of Israel prior to the destruction of the Temple in 70 CE (AD). He further qualifies this teaching by instructing us, not to focus on the cloud of witnesses, but on Yeshua, the Author and Perfecter of faith (The faith that our Jewish forebears shared in the coming Messiah Yeshua). We cannot engage with this cloud of witnesses because they are deceased and according to Scripture (Hebrews 9:27) they are uncontactable. Those who do seek to speak to the dead are in fact speaking with demonic forces rather than the spirits of dead people (1 Timothy 4:1; 1 Corinthians 10:20-21; 2 Corinthians 11:14-15). “Let no one be found among you who sacrifices his son or daughter in the fire, who practices divination or sorcery, interprets omens, engages in witchcraft, or casts spells, or who is a medium or spiritist or who consults the dead.” –Deuteronomy 18:10-12 Therefore, not only are we unable to engage with the dead witnesses of Hebrews 11-12, we are also commanded by God not to attempt to speak with the dead. “let’s rid ourselves of, put off, lay aside every weight, burden, encumbrance, obstacle and the sin, the missing of the mark set by God’s holiness, which so easily entangles us,” Sin is described in the Tanakh as a burden too heavy to bear (Ps. 38:4). Along with the first century Jewish followers of Messiah Yeshua we are admonished to intentionally remove those things in our lives that provoke us to sin. To remove false choices from our lives. To remove divisive conversations over amoral choices. To remove grudges and petty squabbles, and the wilful sins that we continue to return to like dogs to vomit. By all these things we have become easily entangled, confused, misdirected, unfocused, and led astray. Therefore, we are admonished to tishuvah (return) our focus to Yeshua. Repentant faith is great faith. “and let’s run with patient endurance the race that is first, set before us,” We are to return to our first love. The Greek prokeimai combines the meanings “before” and “first” and as a result reflects the prophetic words of Yeshua spoken to Yochanan in the Revelation: “2 I know your deeds, your hard work and your perseverance. I know that you cannot tolerate wicked people, that you have tested those who claim to be apostles but are not, and have found them false. 3 You have persevered and have endured hardships for my name, and have not grown weary. 4 Yet I hold this against you: You have forsaken the love you had at first. 5 Consider how far you have fallen! Repent and do the things you did at first. If you do not repent, I will come to you and remove your lampstand from its place.” -Revelation 2:2-5 (NIV) We note that we are to run the race of our first love with patient endurance, and that the race “is first, set before us,” not “was” but “is”. Once again we are encouraged to see the eternally present reality of the kingdom of God in Yeshua. A number of ancient Judaism’s rabbis used sporting metaphors like this one (Exodus Rabbah 30:24; Genesis Rabbah 22:9). 2 looking only at, into, on, among (eis[G]) Yeshua[H], the Originator, Author, Prince, Captain, Chief (archēgos[G]), and Perfecter, Completer, Consummator (teleiōtēs[G]) of the faith, trust, ongoing belief (pistis[G], emunateinu[H]). Who for the transcendent joy (chara[G], hasimchah[H]) set before Him endured the cross, despising, looking with distain upon, having contempt for (kataphroneō[G]) the shame, and has sat down in the right hand of the throne of God (ho Theos[G], ha Elohiym[H]). 2 looking only at, into, on, among Yeshua[H], the Originator, Author, Prince, Captain, Chief, and Perfecter, Completer, Consummator of the faith, trust, ongoing belief. Who for the transcendent joy set before Him endured the cross, despising, looking with distain upon, having contempt for the shame, and has sat down in the right hand of the throne of God. The writer continues the sporting/running analogy by implying that Yeshua is not only the coach who encourages us at the starting line and awaits us at the finish line, but is also the runner Who went before us. Because Yeshua is the Creator of the track, has already run and won the race, we are not running in order to place in the race, but in order to receive our part in the prize which He has already won. We run a race of trusting endurance. A race that He has run, one that He trains us for, one that He runs with us, a race which begins and finds its goal in Him. He is before us, beside us, within us, awaiting us. Like a young athlete who looks to emulate the performance of his mentor, we look to our Mentor, and with His help, we emulate His performance. Rav Shaul haShaliach (Paul the Apostle) writes: “12 Not that I have already obtained all this, or have already arrived at my goal, but I press on to take hold of that for which Messiah Yeshua took hold of me. 13 Brothers and sisters, I do not consider myself yet to have taken hold of it. But one thing I do: Forgetting what is behind and straining toward what is ahead, 14 I press on toward the goal to win the prize for which God has called me heavenward in Messiah Yeshua.” -Philippians 3:12-14 “looking only at, into, on, among Yeshua” Note that the example of the witnesses of old are to point us to the King Messiah in Whom they had faith. We are not to look to the witnesses for the perfection of our faith, rather we are to look only at, in, on Yeshua. In the walk of the Messiah follower sin manifests only as a result of our having taken our eyes off Yeshua. “the Originator, Author, Prince, Captain, Chief, and Perfecter, Completer, and Consummator of the faith, trust, ongoing belief” Yeshua the all existing Messiah, slain before the creation of the world, is therefore the Originator of the faith, trust, ongoing belief and the Goal, Completer, Consummator of it. Yeshua is the Aleph and Tav, the first and the goal. He is the Author of all things in God and is the Author and essence of the written Torah, and therefore the Author of the instruction that informs our faith, ongoing belief, while also being the Goal of the Torah (Rom. 10:4). He is the Prince, the Chief, Captain and the Head of the faith, Son of God, King of Kings submitted to the King Hashem. He is the Perfector and Completer of the faith through His sacrificial work of consummation, and is therefore the Consummator of faith. We speak in terms of a singular faith because there is but one. Faith, ongoing belief, continued trust in Him is the only means by which we have right relationship in God and eternal life. We note that our faith in Him is not a moment of mental assent to the truth of His work but an ongoing heart trust in Him. “Who for the transcendent joy set before Him endured the cross,” Yeshua exhibited trust in God the Father, being assured that God being faithful would, in Yeshua, bring about the fullness of everlasting Joy born of His saving work resulting in reconciliation. Yeshua looked to the goal and chose to suffer naked on the Roman cross in order to see that goal reached. This is an example to all who believe. “despising, looking with distain upon, having contempt for the shame” He had contempt not only for the shame He suffered but also for shame itself. Through His death on the cross Yeshua put shame to death, so that all who receive Him might walk as He did, showing contempt for the shame associated to persecution and suffering, seeing it as nothing more than a temporal stepping stone to eternal life in Messiah. “and has sat down in the right hand of the throne of God.” Yeshua has returned to the place that symbolizes His authority in the Godhead, the position He has had from before the foundation of the world (Ps. 110:1; 1:3,13; 8:1; 10:12). He allowed Himself to be limited to location (born into time and space in the womb of Miriyam, fully God and fully man), and is now risen from death, trans-locational, transcendent, unbound. 3 For consider, contemplate, ponder, think on (analogizomai[G]) Him who has endured such hostility by sinners, those fading away (hamartōlos[G]), against Himself, so that you will not grow weary and faint, exhausted, relaxed, weakened, despondent (ekluō[G]) in your heart, soul, mind, breath, life (psuchē[G], benafsho[H]). 4 You have not yet resisted [c]to the point of shedding blood (ad hadam[H]) in your struggle (antagōnizomai[G]) against sin, missing the mark set by God’s holiness (hamartia[G], bacheit[H]); 3 For consider, contemplate, ponder, think on Him who has endured such hostility by sinners, those fading away, against Himself, so that you will not grow weary and faint, exhausted, relaxed, weakened, despondent in your heart, soul, mind, breath, life. 4 You have not yet resisted to the point of shedding blood in your struggle against sin, missing the mark set by God’s holiness; The first century Jewish recipients along with all we who have come to believe, having established our focus on Yeshua must now contemplate His life example and His present help. We must remind ourselves that He has suffered in part as an example to us, and that in His suffering, though He was tempted to give up, He nonetheless endured even unto death. Those who first received this teaching had not yet suffered in resisting sin to the point of death (blood shed). Therefore, they are admonished to resist self-pity. Self-pity is an ironic blend of idolatry, self-harm and blasphemy disguised as a justified response to harm. It is the root of a victim mentality that leads to death. It is idolatry because it inevitably concludes that no one has suffered as I have. It is self-harm because it devalues us as created beings and when it becomes our repeated mode of thinking it leads to the dissolution of hope, making us fruitless and leading us into a life full of death. Finally, it is blasphemy because by denying the worth with which we are imbued by the Creator, it impugns God’s character. “so that you don’t grow weary and faint, exhausted, relaxed, weakened, despondent in your heart, mind, soul” Note that by pondering Messiah’s suffering we will avoid the conditions of heart and mind that are listed here. If we see these things manifesting in our lives we are to repent and contemplate Messiah’s example, thus we will be freed from the fruit of self-pity, which is death. A believer may become tired as a result of the role he plays in ministry, however, he must not become weary. Weariness is not a state of physical, emotional or mental tiredness but a way of thinking about that tiredness. Better to say, “I’m tired as a result of the work, I need to rest” rather than say, “I’m weary of all this, I’m done”. Likewise relaxation can become a counterfeit of rest. Where rest restores, vain relaxation can produce laziness. What is the practical discipline needed in order to avoid weariness? To contemplate Messiah’s suffering and the hostility He faced, and take comfort in knowing that Messiah in us faces the hostility that others show toward us. “For we do not have a high priest Who is unable to sympathize, have compassion with our weaknesses, but One who has been tempted, tried, examined, proved in all things just as we are, yet without sin [missing the mark set by God’s holiness].” -Hebrews 4:15 (Author’s translation) “Do you not know? Have you not heard? The Lord is the everlasting God, the Creator of the ends of the earth. He will not grow tired or weary, and his understanding no one can fathom. 29 He gives strength to the weary and increases the power of the weak. 30 Even youths grow tired and weary, and young men stumble and fall; 31 but those who hope in the Lord will renew their strength. They will soar on wings like eagles; they will run and not grow weary, they will walk and not be faint.” -Isaiah 40:28-31 (NIV) “Let us not become weary in doing good, for at the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up.” -Galatians 6:9 (NIV) 5 and you have forgotten the exhortation, consolation, entreaty (paraklēsis[G]) which is addressed to you as sons and daughters, children (uihos[G], kevaniym[H]) “My son (uihos[G]), do not despise (oligōreō[G]) the discipline, instruction (paideia[G]) of the Lord (YHVH[H]), Nor faint, relax, be weakened, become exhausted (ekluō[G]) when you are rebuked (elegchō[G]) by Him; 6 For whom the Lord (YHVH[H]) has all-encompassing love for (agapaō[H]) He disciplines, teaches (paideuō[G]) And He scourges, flogs (mastigoō[G]) every son whom He accepts, receives, delights in (paradechomai[G]).” [Prov. 3:11,12 (ref. LXX)] A literal translation of the Hebrew text of Mishlei (Proverbs) 3:11-12:“The discipline of the LORD my son do not despise, don’t be wearied by His correction. For those who are loved by the LORD He proves as a father does the son in whom he delights.” 5 and you have forgotten the exhortation, consolation, entreaty which is addressed to you as sons and daughters, children, “My son, do not despise the discipline, instruction of the Lord, Nor faint, relax, be weakened, become exhausted when you are rebuked by Him; 6 For whom the Lord has all-encompassing love for He disciplines, teaches And He scourges, flogs every son whom He accepts, receives, delights in.” [Prov. 3:11,12 (ref. LXX)] A literal translation of the Hebrew text of Mishlei (Proverbs) 3:11-12:“The discipline of the LORD my son do not despise, don’t be wearied by His correction. For those who are loved by the LORD He proves as a father does the son in whom he delights.” “and you have forgotten the exhortation, consolation, entreaty which is addressed to you as sons and daughters, children,” In addition to the fact that the recipients of this work have not yet resisted in the struggle against sin unto death, they are now rebuked for forgetting who they are as sons and daughters of God, in particular, sons and daughters of Israel (ethnic, religious, chosen, empirical) to whom the words of Proverbs were given. “My son, do not despise the discipline, instruction of the Lord, Nor faint, relax, be weakened, become exhausted when you are rebuked by Him;” As followers of Messiah we are reminded that we should not respond to the LORD’s discipline by becoming weary or giving up on doing what is right. “For whom the Lord has all-encompassing love for He disciplines, teaches And He scourges, flogs every son whom He accepts, receives, delights in.” The discipline of the LORD is evidence of His love for His children. It is a wicked father who fails to discipline his children. Why does the Greek text use the word “scourged, flogged”? In part this is done by the writer of this work in order to make a kal vechomer (light and heavy) argument using a comparative drash between Yeshua’s suffering under the scourge of Roman oppression and the suffering of the first century Jewish believers. In short the writer is saying, “If Yeshua Who is sinless was nonetheless proved in the flogging He received, how much more should we as sinful people expect flogging (suffering) as a form of discipline that proves (refines) us on our journey of sanctification in faith?” God Who understands the end from the beginning disciplines those who receive Him, whereas those who will refuse Him cannot be understood to be disciplined by Him because discipline results in the proving of a person. Therefore, those destined for destruction endure suffering in vain. Based on this Biblical idea Judaism makes a distinction between “yisurin shel ahavah” meaning “chastisements of love” upon the children of God and “chastisements” in general (Mekhilta Bachodesh 10; Talmud Bavliy Berakot 5a; Talmud Bavliy Sanhedrin 101a; Genesis Rabbah 42:1). It is the former that is being discussed here. 7 For in as much as you endure the discipline, nurturing, chastening (paideia[G]); the God (ho Theos[G], ha Elohiym[H]) offers it (prospherō[G]) to you as to sons (uihos[G], vaniym[H]); for what son is there who is not disciplined, taught (paideuō[G]) by his father (pater[G], av[H])? 8 But if you are without discipline, nurturing, chastening (paideia[G]) of which all have become partakers, partners (metochos[G]) then you are illegitimate children (nothos[G], mamzeriym[H]) and not sons (uihos[G], vaniym[H]). 7 For in as much as you endure the discipline, nurturing, chastening; the God offers it to you as to sons; for what son is there who is not disciplined, taught by his father? Those who experience suffering as a disciplining from God can find comfort in the knowledge that this is evidence that they are sons and daughters of God. 8 But if you are without discipline, nurturing, chastening of which all have become partakers, partners then you are illegitimate children and not sons. All believers are partakers in the chastening against sin which bears the fruit of a repentant lifestyle. Those who are not partners in the disciplining of God are illegitimate children, in Hebrew/Yiddish mamzeriym, equivalent to the English bastard. The analogy relates to seed. The legitimate son is seeded by the faith in Messiah whereas the illegitimate son is seeded by the evil one. All human beings are children of creation, but only those who receive God’s redemptive work through Messiah are given the right to become children of God (John 1:12). According to Scripture legitimate sons become heirs, whereas illegitimate sons do not inherit. In the present instance the inheritance in question is that of eternal life. All this is pretext to the example given in verse 16 of the godless actions of Esau, who failed to inherit, as opposed to Yaakov, who in faith inherited. 9 Furthermore, additionally, we had earthly fathers (avot[H], fathers of the flesh) who corrected, instructed, disciplined (paideutēs[G]) us, and we respected them; shall we not much more be subject to the Father (Av[H]) of spirits, winds, life (pneuma[G], haruchot[H]) and continue living (zaō[G])? 10 For they disciplined, instructed, taught (paideuō[G]) us for a short time as seemed best to them, but He for better, good, corporate well-being (sumpherō[G], letov[H]) so that we may be partners, partakers (metalambanō[G]) in His holiness (bekadosho[H]). 9 Furthermore, additionally, we had earthly fathers (fathers of the flesh) who corrected, instructed, disciplined us, and we respected them; shall we not much more be subject to the Father of spirits, winds, life and continue living? Once again the writer uses kal vechomer. If earthly fathers discipline us to some affect, how much more effective is the discipline of the perfect heavenly Father. 10 For they disciplined, instructed, taught us for a short time as seemed best to them, but He for better, good, corporate well-being so that we may be partners, partakers in His holiness. The discipline of our earthly fathers was imperfect but the discipline of God being perfect is for something better, that is the individual and corporate well-being of all who believe, who through Yeshua and in response to God’s discipline become partakers in His holiness. 11 Now, all discipline, nurturing, chastening (paideia[G]) for the present (pareimi[G]) seems not to be joyful (chara[G], sason[H]), but painful, heavy, grievous (lupē[G]); nevertheless afterward, at last (husteron[G]) it yields, pays, delivers (apodidōmi[G]) the peaceful (eirēnikos[G]) fruit (karpos[G]) of righteousness (dikaiosunē[G], tzedakah[H]) in those who have been trained (gumnazō[G]) by it, 12 Therefore (because you understand the reason for the discipline), lift up (anorthoō[G]) the hands (yadayim[H]) that hang down (are growing weary) and strengthen the knees that are feeble (ameitzu[H]), 11 Now, all discipline, nurturing, chastening for the present seems not to be joyful, but painful, heavy, grievous; nevertheless afterward, at last it yields, pays, delivers the peaceful fruit of righteousness in those who have been trained by it, Prior to the first century C.E. the Greek word karpos (fruit/vegetable) was assimilated into the Hebrew language as karpas (green leafy vegetable, parsley, celery) and became part of the symbolism of the Pesach (Passover) seder (order) meal. This adds significance to the present teaching because it is a familiar connection for first century Jewish Messiah followers and combines the ideas of suffering (salt water) and new life (spring vegetable). The karpas (parsley) is dipped in salt water symbolizing the tears of Israel resulting from ancient Egyptian slavery. Israel’s sojourn in Egypt was a type of proving, a time of discipline which culminated in freedom and a further journey of discipline through the desert which resulted in her entry into the promised land. The message here is that God is present in the discipline, proving, sanctifying and making us ready for the promised future. We are being trained by our momentary struggles so as to exhibit the peaceful fruit of righteousness. 12 Therefore (because you understand the reason for the discipline), lift up the hands that hang down (are growing weary) and strengthen the knees that are feeble, “Lift up the hands that hang down” means to lend help to another whose arms are becoming weary. It is a first century Hebrew idiom related to the actions of Aaron and Hur who helped Moses to keep his hands lifted in praise to God as a symbolic gesture denoting the fact that it was God Who was defeating Israel’s enemies in battle (Exodus 17). As a result of Aaron and Hur acting to strengthen their leader Moses, Joshua the leader of Israel’s army overcame the Amalekite army and God decreed the obliteration of the Amalekites, who represented idolatry and hatred of God and His people. This can be seen as an example to the first century recipients of the Book to the Hebrews, one which we can also apply. When we strengthen one another in Messiah, when we lift up the weary hands of our leaders and our suffering brothers and sisters, we will see the victory of God in Yeshua (Joshua) over the enemy (Satan/Amalekites). 13 and make straight, upright (orthos[G]) paths (trochia[G]) for your feet, so that the limb which is impaired (chōlos[G]) may not be dislocated (ektrepō[G]), but rather be healed, made whole (iaomai[G]). 14 Pursue (diōkō[G]) peace (eirēnē[G], shalom[H]) with all individually and collectively (eirēnē[G], kol adam[H]), and the holiness, sanctification (hagiasmos[G]) without which no one will see the Lord (Kurios[G], YHVH[H]). 15 look diligently (episkopeō[G]), forbid (mē[G]) everyone from coming short of the grace (charis[G], chesed[H]) of the God (ho Theos[G], ha Elohiym[H]); forbid any root (rhiza[G]) of bitterness, poison (pikria[G]) from springing up to cause trouble, and by it many become defiled (miainō[G]); 13 and make straight, upright paths for your feet, so that the limb which is impaired may not be dislocated, but rather be healed, made whole. The wicked rush to do evil (Isa. 59:7) but the righteous bring good news and announce peace (Isa. 52:7). The path of the righteous is made straight by the LORD (Prov. 3:5-6). Practically speaking making straight paths involves removing obstacles and making the paths traversable. Straight, level paths pose less danger in the dark and mean that those walking them are less likely to trip and become injured. A person who is hobbling from a pre-existing injury is unlikely to aggravate the injury further while walking a straight path, and thus can begin the road to full health. The obstacles that need to be cleared are the rocks of sin, bitterness, apostasy. The Word of God is a lamp to the feet and a light to the clear path (Ps. 119:105). Therefore, part of ensuring a safe journey on a straight path is the preparation of God’s Word. Daylight will turn to dusk and night, at which point we require light. 14 Pursue peace with all individually and collectively, and the holiness, sanctification without which no one will see the Lord. To pursue peace is to pursue the Prince of Peace (Yeshua), we are to pursue the peace of Yeshua as individuals and in community of faith, and in peace we are to seek the holiness and sanctification found in Yeshua, without which no one can be reconciled to right relationship in God. “will see the Lord” Meaning, to see God with unveiled face when He manifests His glory in the new heaven and new earth. “If it be possible, as much as it depends on you, live peaceably with all men.” -Romans 12:18 “Depart from evil, and do good; seek peace, and pursue it.” -Psalm 34:14 (15) KJV 15 look diligently, forbid everyone from coming short of the grace of the God; forbid any root of bitterness, poison from springing up to cause trouble, and by it many become defiled; When God through Moses gave the covenant to all Israel (Deut. 29) Moses warned: “So that there will not be among you a man or woman, or family or tribe, whose heart turns away today from the Lord our God, to go to serve the gods of those nations; that there will not be among you a root bearing poisonous fruit and wormwood.” -Deuteronomy 29:18 NASB Believers are admonished to diligently watch the fruit of the individuals that make up the community of faith. They are to expose and root out any root of bitterness and forbid its growth so that it doesn’t poison and divide the community of faith. We note that the bitterness in question results from hearts turning away from God and toward idolatry (Deut.29:18). It is faithlessness that can defile the entire community. The language of defilement relates to unclean things. If unclean practices are allowed to permeate the community of faith the community becomes like an unclean animal that cannot be offered to God. Rav Shaul’s words make a good segue between the subject of bitter apostacy and the practice of pursuing carnal pleasures at the expense of eternal inheritance: “17 Brothers and sisters, join in following my example, and observe those who walk according to the pattern you have in us. 18 For many walk, of whom I often told you, and now tell you even as I weep, that they are the enemies of the cross of Messiah, 19 whose end is destruction, whose god is their appetite, and whose glory is in their shame, who have their minds on earthly things. 20 For our citizenship is in heaven, from which we also eagerly wait for a Saviour, the Lord Yeshua the Messiah; 21 who will transform the body of our lowly condition into conformity with His glorious body, by the exertion of the power that He has even to subject all things to Himself.” -Philippians 3:17-21 16 Forbid (mē[G]) any sexually immoral (pornos[G]) or godless person (bebēlos[G]) like Esav[H] (Esau), who sold his own birth-right for a single meal. 17 For you know that even afterward, when he wanted to inherit the blessing (bechorato[H]), he was rejected, disallowed (apodokimazō[G]) for he found no place, room, opportunity (topos[G], makom[H]) for repentance (metanoia[G], teshuvato[H]), though he sought for it with tears. 16 Forbid any sexually immoral or godless person like Esav[H], who sold his own birth-right for a single meal. 17 For you know that even afterward, when he wanted to inherit the blessing, he was rejected, disallowed for he found no place, room, opportunity for repentance, though he sought for it with tears. Sexually immorality is taken very seriously and is explained as evidence of godlessness. Believers are not just to look down on, but to forbid sexual immorality. Likewise, those who like Esau, despise the eternal birth-right given to those in Messiah Yeshua in favour of pursuing the temporal pleasures of sin in an intentionally sinful lifestyle, are to be forbidden, asked to leave the community. The Scripture teaches that all are invited but only the repentant may remain. Esau’s rejection described here is the rejection of his father Isaac and not the rejection of God relative to Esau’s eternal position. Isaac was unable to bless Esau with the blessing that had already been given, once given the blessing is like a spiritual version of a binding legal document (Gen. 25-27). We note that Esau is said to have been rejected, not because he was upset about what he had chosen to do but because he did not find the capacity to repent of what he had done. This is evidenced in the bitter hatred and vengeful intentions he exhibited toward Jacob following the death of Isaac. This is used as an example which draws a correlation between the birth right and the inheritance of eternal life, and between the pot of red stew and the temporal pleasures of this life (Philippians 3:17-21). Esau’s selling of his birth-right for food is a metaphor for the believer who trades his eternal inheritance for the temporal pleasures of sin. Ultimately, at any point prior to death the repentant can receive forgiveness and enter the inheritance offered by God through Yeshua. “The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering toward us, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.” -2 Peter 3:9 Copyright 2021 Yaakov Brown Great faith is repentant faith. Introduction:
The remainder of this chapter gives us examples of faith in action and affords us an opportunity to apply the principles practiced by our faithful forebears. We see that those who came before were not perfect but were faithful in their imperfection, trusting God for their righteousness and acting in repentant belief through the promise of the King Messiah. In certain cases, their faith proved through trial became a prefigure of the saving work of Yeshua and the redemptive purposes of God for humanity. Previous verses: 17 In faith, trust, assurance, belief Avraham[H], when he was examined, proved, brought up Yitzchak[H] [Isaac], and the one who had received the promises was offering up his only son; 18 it was he to whom it was said, “Through Yitzchak[H] your seed shall be called.” [Gen. 21:12] 19 He considered that the God is able to raise people even from the dead, from which he also received him back as a type, figure, parable. 20 In faith, trust, assurance, belief Yitzchak[H] blessed Yaakov[H] and Esav[H], even regarding things to come. HEBREWS 11:21-40 (Author’s translation) 21 In faith, trust, assurance, belief Yaakov[H] as he was dying, blessed, spoke well over both the sons of Yoseph[H], and worshiped, on the top of his staff. 22 In faith, trust, assurance, belief Yoseph[H], when he was dying, made mention of the exodus of the children of Yisrael[H], and gave commandment concerning his bones. 23 In faith, trust, assurance, belief Moshe[H], when he was born, was hidden for three months by his parents, because they saw he was a beautiful child; and they were not afraid of the Pharoah’s edict. 24 In faith, trust, assurance, belief Moshe[H], when he had grown up, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh’s daughter, 25 choosing rather to endure ill-treatment, undergo suffering and affliction with the people, of the God than to enjoy the pleasures of sin for a season, temporarily, 26 considering the reproach, abusive disapproval levelled at Messiah greater riches than the treasures of Mitzrayim[H]; for he was looking to the reward, wages. 27 In faith, trust, assurance, belief he left Mitzrayim[H], not fearing the wrath of the Pharoah; for he persevered, as though seeing Him who is unseen. 28 In faith, trust, assurance, belief he kept the Pesach[H] and the sprinkling of the blood, so that the destroyer of the firstborn would not touch them. 29 In faith, trust, assurance, belief they passed through the Red Sea as though on dry land; and the Mitzrayim[H], when they attempted it, were swallowed up, devoured, drowned. 30 In faith, trust, assurance, belief the walls of Yeriychoh[H] fell down after the Israelites had marched around them for seven days. 31 In faith, trust, assurance, belief the prostitute, fornicator, idolatress Rachav[H] did not perish along with those who were disobedient, after she had welcomed the spies in peace. 32 And what more shall I say? For time will fail me if I tell of Gid’on[H], Barak[H] Shimshon[H], Yiphtach[H], of David[H] and Shemuel[H] and the prophets, 33 who in faith, trust, assurance, belief conquered kingdoms, performed acts of righteousness, obtained promises, shut the mouths of lions, 34 quenched the power of fire, escaped the edge of the sword, from weakness were made strong, became mighty in war, put foreign armies to flight. 35 Women received back their dead by resurrection; and others were tortured, not accepting their release, so that they might obtain a better resurrection; 36 and others experienced mocking and flogging, and further, chains and imprisonment. 37 They were stoned, they were sawn in two, they were tempted, examined, proved, they were put to death with the sword; they went about in sheepskins, in goatskins, being destitute, afflicted, tormented 38 (people of whom the world was not worthy), wandering in deserts, on mountains, and sheltering in caves and holes in the ground. 39 And all these, having gained a good report upon their faith, did not receive what was promised, messaged, 40 because the God had provided something better for us, so that apart from us they would not be made perfect, complete, consecrated. HEBREWS 11:21-40 (line upon line) 21 In faith, trust, assurance, belief (pistis[G], ba-emunah[H]) Yaakov[H] (Jacob – follower) as he was dying, blessed, spoke well over (eulogeō[G], beirakh[H]) both the sons of Yoseph[H] (Joseph – YHVH adds), and worshiped (proskuneō[G]), on the top of his staff (rhabdos[G]). 22 In faith, trust, assurance, belief (pistis[G], ba-emunah[H]) Yoseph[H], when he was dying, made mention of the exodus of the children of Yisrael[H], and gave commandment (entellomai[G]) concerning his bones. 21 In faith, trust, assurance, belief Yaakov[H] as he was dying, blessed, spoke well over both the sons of Yoseph[H], and worshiped, on the top of his staff. Ref. Genesis 48 The reference to Yaakov worshipping God while leaning on the top of his staff either reflects the Greek Septuagint reading of Genesis 47:31 (the Masoretic text marks the vowels [nikudot] as MiTaH “bed”, but the Hebrew text of the Torah scroll has no such markings and may also be read MaTeH “staff”), or refers to an unrecorded act that followed the blessings portion of the account of Genesis 48. In either case Yaakov/Yisrael is worshipping God while leaning on the head of his staff, the staff denoting authority, support and the head of the staff being a metaphor for the chief authority given Yaakov (over Israel the people). Therefore, Yaakov submits all of Israel to God in worship. The account of Yaakov blessing Yoseph’s sons has many similarities with that of Isaac’s blessing Yaakov and Esav. Yaakov is said to have been blind at this point, just as Isaac had been poor sighted when blessing Yaakov and Esav. Yaakov also crosses his hands in order to bless the younger son over the elder. The text of the Book to the Hebrews illuminates the fact that Yaakov trusted God in faith to fulfil the prophetic blessing he pronounced over the sons of Yoseph. Yaakov believed that those descended from Yoseph’s sons would see the promised land, even though at the time Israel was in the land of Egypt. This begins a progression of faithful ones from Yaakov through Yoseph to Moshe, who among themselves saw the provision of God from the time Israel entered Egypt until the time that the nation was delivered from slavery and brought to the promised land (which the writer of the book to the Hebrews has previously used as a metaphor describing the transcendent location of the land in the Olam Haba [world to come] ref. Heb. 3 - 4). 22 In faith, trust, assurance, belief Yoseph[H], when he was dying, made mention of the exodus of the children of Yisrael[H], and gave commandment concerning his bones. Prior to this Yaakov had requested that Yoseph inter his remains in the cave Avraham had purchased by the field of Machpelah opposite Mamre in Canaan (the land of Israel)[Gen. 50:1:21]. Yoseph, though he lived several hundred years prior to the exodus, firmly believed God would bring Israel out of Egypt into the land of promise. He believed this based on faith passed down from Avraham and was so certain of its taking place that he gave instructions for his mummified remains/bones to be carried with Israel during their exodus and to be brought into the promised land and there be interred [Gen. 50:22-26]. The bones of Yoseph were carried out of Egypt some 400 years after his death: “And Moses took the bones of Joseph with him: for he had directly charged the children of Israel, saying, ‘God will surely visit you; and you shall carry up my bones away hence with you.’” -Shemot (Exodus) 13:19 Upon arriving in the land of promise the children of Israel interred the bones of Yoseph in Shechem on a parcel of land purchased by Yaakov, and so Ephraim and Manasseh inherited that plot of land according to the will of Yaakov their progenitor. “And the bones of Joseph, which the children of Israel brought up out of Egypt, they interred in Shechem, in a parcel of ground which Jacob had purchased off of the sons of Hamor the father of Shechem for a hundred pieces of silver: and it became the inheritance of the children of Joseph.” -Yehoshua (Joshua) 24:32 23 In faith, trust, assurance, belief (pistis[G], ba-emunah[H]) Moshe[H] (drawn out one, resurrected one), when he was born, was hidden for three months by his parents, because they saw he was a beautiful child; and they were not afraid (phobeō[G]) of the Pharoah’s (basileus[G], king’s) edict. 24 In faith, trust, assurance, belief (pistis[G], ba-emunah[H]) Moshe[H], when he had grown up, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh’s daughter, 23 In faith, trust, assurance, belief Moshe[H], when he was born, was hidden for three months by his parents, because they saw he was a beautiful child; and they were not afraid of the Pharoah’s edict. The faith spoken of here is that of Moses’ parents. The Masoretic text records Moses’ mother Yocheved hiding him, while the Septuagint records both parents (Amram & Yocheved Ex. 6:20) hiding him. This is not a contradiction but an illumination. A mother has a special connection to her child that a father does not share in kind, therefore, it was Moses’ mother who led in the decision to hide him in agreement with his father, both loving him equally and uniquely. The phrase “saw that he was beautiful” is first a way of saying, that as is the case with all good parents, Moses was precious in their sight and that they were willing to sacrifice everything in order to protect Moses from death at the hands of an idolatrous Pharoah. Second, it is an indication of Moses’ unique role as deliverer. The text tells us that Moses’ parents were not afraid of Pharoah’s edict (Ex. 1:16, 22) because of their devout faith in God and by inference, His promised Messiah, prefigured in their son Moses. Moses, the drawn out or resurrected one, was placed in a basket in the Nile river where other children had been tossed as sacrifices to the crocodile deity Sebek a.k.a Sobek. Metaphorically Moses was given over to death. However, seeing his basket the daughter of Pharoah drew him out of the water and raised him as her own, a living parable of resurrection. Thus, Moses’ very name (character, history) is prophetic of the death and resurrection of the King Messiah Yeshua. 24 In faith, trust, assurance, belief Moshe[H], when he had grown up, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh’s daughter, When Moses reached the age of understanding (13yrs according to the modern Jewish rite of Bar Mitzvah), he was aware of his lineage and refused to be known as the son of Pharoah’s daughter, not out of disrespect for her but in deference to his own people and his own God. We note that to some degree deity was attached to the royals of Egypt and that part of the need for Moses to make his affiliation to Israel clear was related to severing ties to some of the idolatrous practices of the Pharaohs. On a practical level his conviction of faith saw him leave the palace with its comforts and prestige, temporal sinful pleasures and so on, and instead live among his brothers and sisters, the oppressed Israelite slaves in relative poverty. 25 choosing rather to endure ill-treatment, undergo suffering and affliction (sugkakoucheō[G]) with the people (ho laos[G], am[H]), of the God (ho Theos[G], Elohiym[H]) than to enjoy the pleasures (echō apolausis[G]) of sin for a season, temporarily (proskairos[G]), 26 considering the reproach, abusive disapproval (oneidismos[G]) levelled at Messiah (Christos[G], Mashiach[H]) greater (meizōn[G]) riches than the treasures of Mitzrayim[H] (Egypt – double distress); for he was looking to the reward, wages (misthapodosia[G]). 25 choosing rather to endure ill-treatment, undergo suffering and affliction with the people, of the God than to enjoy the pleasures of sin for a season, temporarily, The context denotes that “the people of the God” is a phrase synonymous with “Israel” (ethnic), the descendants of Jacob. “The pleasures of sin” can refer to sin acts of any kind, and could include the oppression of the Israelites. Moses firmly rejected a lifestyle of sin in favour of a godly calling unto suffering and trial. Moses could have worked behind the scenes provoking political intrigue and positioning himself to direct the ruling class of Egypt toward changing their view of the Israelites. He could have done all this and continued to enjoy the comforts of royal life, but he did not. His faith in God and in the ultimate Deliverer Yeshua meant that compromise was not an option. He both counted and paid the cost of clinging to his God, his people and his calling. He saw the pleasures of this world as temporary and instead chose the unseen and eternal joy of the Olam Haba (world to come), trusting that God Who is faithful, would manifest His promises to Israel at the appointed time. The first century C.E. Jewish recipients of this work were in part faced with a similar choice between living comfortably under the apostate priesthood which was for a time politically aligned with Rome and therefore the Emperor (Pharoah of the day), or being rejected by family and friends and left struggling to make ends meet along with their fellow Messiah following Jewish brothers and sisters. In short, they could relate to Moses and the struggles he faced and could take comfort in the fact that they shared in his faith. We too can take comfort in this knowledge, that we have many faithful examples in the lives of those who have gone before us. Regardless of when a believer lives within the chronology of history, we are all united in the same saving faith in Yeshua our King Messiah. 26 considering the reproach, abusive disapproval levelled at Messiah greater riches than the treasures of Mitzrayim[H]; for he was looking to the reward, wages. Ref. Exodus 2:11-15 To say as so many commentators do, that “Moses’ understanding of the Messiah was very limited”, is utter nonsense born of presumption. If the resurrected Messiah is transcendent and unbound by time and space then He is also trans-locational and able to reveal Himself at any point in the chronology of Israel’s history. First, Moses must have seen Messiah in faith in order for him to consider “the suffering of Messiah of greater riches than the temporal riches of Egypt,” and second, the suffering of Messiah is here connected to the suffering of the Israelites under bondage in Egypt. Moses being a type for the Messiah, the “prophet” like Moses Whom God would send in the future. Moses knew enough to say that “the Word (ha-Davar[H]/logos[G]) is very near you, even in your mouth, and in your heart” (Deut. 30:14), and “The Lord your God will raise up for you a prophet like me…” (Deut. 18:15-22). Yeshua said “For had you believed Moses, you would have believed Me: for he wrote of Me.” (John 5:46). One might say that Moses’ understanding of the King Messiah was markedly greater than that of many modern Christians. So was his understanding limited? Perhaps. But not as limited as the understanding of many of our modern theological scholars. “He was looking to the reward” based on his faith in God through Messiah. It is the reward that is unseen. The Olam Haba (world to come). 27 In faith, trust, assurance, belief (pistis[G], ba-emunah[H]) he left Mitzrayim[H] (Egypt – double distress), not fearing the wrath of the Pharoah (basileus[G], king); for he persevered, as though seeing Him who is unseen. 28 In faith, trust, assurance, belief (pistis[G], ba-emunah[H]) he kept the Pesach[H] (Passover) and the sprinkling of the blood, so that the destroyer of the firstborn would not touch them. 27 In faith, trust, assurance, belief he left Mitzrayim[H], not fearing the wrath of the Pharoah; for he persevered, as though seeing Him who is unseen. Ref. Exodus 2, & 5 through 13 “he left Mitzrayim[H], not fearing the wrath of the Pharoah” can refer to both his fleeing to Midian aged 40 years (Ex. 2) and to his subsequent exodus with Israel following the plagues (Ex. 13). There is no need to debate over the application of this phrase. Moses did not fear the powerful wrath of Pharaoh because he feared the One true God of all creation, El Elohay Yisrael (God the God of Israel). The fear of God is an end to fear. “As though seeing Him who is unseen” is a reference to God the Father, Who is unseen. And makes sense because Moses spoke to the person of Messiah (the Son) face to face. “So the Lord used to speak to Moses face to face, just as a man speaks to his friend. When [a]Moses returned to the camp, his servant Joshua, the son of Nun, a young man, would not depart from the tent.” -Exodus 33:11 (NASB) We know that “the Lord” in this verse is YHVH manifest as the Son Yeshua (resurrected, transcendent, not preincarnate), because in all cases in the Tanakh where a human being sees God it is an encounter with either the Malakh HaShem (Samson's parents) or a the Man [Angel] (Jacob wrestled) that they see and not the unseen Father (albeit He is revealed in the Son). They do not see the unseen Father because: “He further said, “You cannot see My face, for mankind shall not see Me and live!” -Exodus 33:20 (NASB) 28 In faith, trust, assurance, belief he kept the Pesach[H] and the sprinkling of the blood, so that the destroyer of the firstborn would not touch them. Ref. Exodus 12 Moses kept the Passover according to God’s instruction understanding the great cost being paid in order to save the lives of Israel’s first born. Moses’s own firstborn son had come close to being killed by the Destroyer (Angel of the Lord) when he was returning to Egypt with Zipporah following his exile in Midian. God does not abide hypocrisy, if the uncircumcised sons of Egypt were to suffer death as a result of Egypt’s guilt, how much more an uncircumcised son of Israel. Moses had not circumcised his son Gershom in covenant to HaShem according to the covenant of the fathers and was therefore putting his son at risk. An uncircumcised male was not considered a son of Israel. Zipporah Moses’ Midianite wife rushed to circumcise their son, and as a result of her faith in the God of Israel Moses’ son was spared from the Destroyer, Angel of the Lord, the Lord Himself. Zipporah threw the bloody foreskin at the child’s feet signifying that the boy was to walk according to the faith of Israel, and thus his life was spared in a prefigurative prophetic action relating to the final plague that was to come against the firstborn of Egypt. Alternatively, the bloody foreskin was thrown at Moses feet to symbolize the sanctifying and sparing of Moses household wherever they walked. Either way, all of this prefigures the substitutionary death of the only begotten Son of God Yeshua the King Messiah. Finally Zipporah cried out “You’re a Husband of blood to me”. Moses may be the subject of the pronouncement, but given he is likely not the subject of any of the other events pertaining to this exchange, the most likely subject of Zipporah’s pronouncement is the Angel of the Lord (Yeshua, manifest, resurrected, transcendent, not preincarnate). For further study please read my commentary on Exodus 4:24-26 https://www.bethmelekh.com/yaakovs-commentary---15081497151214931513-1497150615111489/zipporahs-flint-knife-a-concise-interpretation-of-shemotexodus-424-26 I believe Moses further understood the symbolic significance of the blood of the Pesach lamb and its prefiguring of the suffering of the Messiah, which he has already been said to have considered of “greater worth than the temporal pleasures of Pharaoh’s palace.” “Purge out therefore the old yeast, that you may be a new lump, for you are unleavened. For it is certain that Messiah our Pesach (lamb) is sacrificed for us:” -1 Corinthians 5:7 29 In faith, trust, assurance, belief (pistis[G], ba-emunah[H]) they passed through the Red Sea as though on dry land; and the Mitzrayim[H] (Egyptians – people of double distress), when they attempted it, were swallowed up, devoured, drowned (katapinō[G]). 30 In faith, trust, assurance, belief (pistis[G], ba-emunah[H]) the walls of Yeriychoh[H] (his moon, Jericho) fell down after the Israelites had marched around them for seven days. 29 In faith, trust, assurance, belief they passed through the Red Sea as though on dry land; and the Mitzrayim[H], when they attempted it, were swallowed up, devoured, drowned. Ref. Exodus 14-15 It is worth noting that “he” (Moses) is said to have kept the Passover, whereas “they” (all Israel) passed through the Red Sea (Sea of Suph, Sea of Reeds). This can be understood as a remez (hint) that points to Messiah. “He” being the Pesach Lamb, the ultimate keeper of Passover, and “They” being those who follow Him through death (Red Sea) into life everlasting (Promised land). The plain meaning of the text denotes both individual and corporate saving faith. We accept Messiah in faith as individuals and our faith is connected to the community of believers. This concludes the references to Moses, the writer having alluded to each 40 year section of Moses’ life. His exile and return from Midian, His leadership of the Israelites under the oppression of Pharoah, and finally, following the journey through the Red Sea, his 40 years of leading Israel in the wilderness toward the promised land. Moses died aged 120 in Moab (Deut. 34:1-7). 30 In faith, trust, assurance, belief the walls of Yeriychoh[H] fell down after the Israelites had marched around them for seven days. Ref. Joshua 6:1-20 The writer now alludes to the corporate faith of Israel under the leadership of Yehoshua (Yeshua, Joshua, Jesus: YHVH is Salvation). Moses led Israel to the promised land and Joshua led Israel into the promised land, crossing the Jordan as they had crossed the Red Sea on dry ground. Once again, the crossing of the waters was a metaphor for death and the entering into the land a metaphor for everlasting life in the promised land of the Olam Haba (world to come). Joshua sharing his name with the future Messiah Yeshua Who would lead us through death and into life, make resurrection unto eternal life possible. This is now the second time that corporate faith is mentioned. The faith of all those among the ancient Israelites who truly trusted in God. The lesson for the first century Jewish believers is that of seeing their personal faith as part of a corporate faith that unites them. Several ancient Jewish commentators: Targum Yonatan, Yarchi, and Kimkhi re. Joshua. vi. 5. Describe the walls of Jericho sinking right down into the ground, and being completely swallowed up. The Septuagint says that the walls fell round about and the Masoretic text describes the walls falling flat (Joshua 6:20). Each of these accounts affirms and illuminates the other. Yarchi and Kimkhi claim that the walls of Jericho fell on the Shabbat, and there is a strong likelihood of this given that the march around the walls is likely to have begun at Havdalah (distinction: the end of Shabbat at sundown) the seven days of the march concluding the following Shabbat when the walls fell. 31 In faith, trust, assurance, belief (pistis[G], ba-emunah[H]) the prostitute, fornicator, idolatress (pornē[G]) Rachav[H] (wide, broad, Rahab) did not perish along with those who were disobedient, after she had welcomed the spies in peace (beshalom[H]). 32 And what more shall I say? For time will fail me if I tell of Gid’on[H] (feller, cutter, hewer, warrior), Barak[H] (lightening flash) Shimshon[H] (like the sun), Yiphtach[H] (he opens), of David[H] (beloved) and Shemuel[H] (hears God, named for God) and the prophets, (nevi’im[H]) 31 In faith, trust, assurance, belief the prostitute, fornicator, idolatress Rachav[H] did not perish along with those who were disobedient, after she had welcomed the spies in peace. Ref. Joshua 2:1-21; 6:21-25; Matt. 1:5-6 “the prostitute Rachav” is a description of the lifestyle of Rachav prior to her entering the faith of Israel. Rachav did not perish because she was repentant and acknowledged the God of Israel as the One true God and deliverer of those who receive righteousness in Him. We know this because she was not among “those who were disobedient…” and instead “welcomed the spies” of Israel in peace. The suggestion by many ancient Jewish scholars and some Christian theologians that Rachav was not a harlot but merely an innkeeper contradicts the Holy Spirit inspired writings of the Book to the Hebrews and the Book of Yaakov (James). The Hebrew “zonah” is from the root “zanah” which describes the act of fornication, adultery, prostitution and leaves no doubt that Rachav was a woman of the night. The use of the word “zonah” is so intrenched in the Hebrew psyche, that it remains a part of modern colloquial Hebrew vernacular, “Ben zonah” meaning, “Son of a whore”, equivalent to the English slang “Son of a bitch”. Regardless of disagreements over Rachav’s occupation, both Jewish and Christian commentators agree that Rachav is a heroine of the faith (Sifre Numbers 78; Talmud Bavliy tractate Megillah 14b; Numbers Rabbah 8.b; Matt. 1:5; Jas. 2:25). Part of Rachav’s journey toward salvation and faith was her decision to welcome and protect the spies of Israel the chosen people of HaShem. To despise God’s chosen people Israel is evidence that a person does not know the saving faith of Yeshua. Many today who claim to be Messiah followers, hate and actively speak out against the Jewish people and the modern state of Israel, proving by the fruit of their mouths to be without true faith. The faith of Rachav is as important as the faith of Avraham. As I have stated previously, great faith is repentant faith. Rachav, a foreigner and an idolater, being repentant, was not only welcomed into the family of Israel and the faith in God, she also become a forebear of the King Messiah Yeshua (Matt. 1:1-16). In teaching that faith is evidenced by action Yaakov (James) writes: “In the same way, is it not true that Rachav the prostitute was considered righteous given what she did when she gave lodging to the spies and sent them off in a different direction? As the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without right action proves to be dead.” -Yaakov (James) 2:25-26 (Author’s translation) 32 And what more shall I say? For time will fail me if I tell of Gid’on[H], Barak[H] Shimshon[H], Yiphtach[H], of David[H] and Shemuel[H] and the prophets, This verse gives a concise account of the generational faith that stretches from the judges of Israel to the kings and prophets, in order to show that faith in God through Messiah is a common thread that runs through the leadership of the Jewish people, both political and religious. Faith among the Judges (intermediary rulers) Gideon (Judges 6-8) Samson (Judges 13-16) Jephthah (Judges 11-12) General of Israel’s army (sub ruler, commander) Barak (Judges 4-5) The Faith of Kingship (rule of the king) David The faith of Prophets (spiritual rule) Samuel (judge – prophets) Prophets (all other prophets of God, not inclusive of false prophets who were faithless) While this list of judges of Israel leaves out Ehud (Judges 3) and Deborah (Judges 4-5) among others (1 Sam. 12:11), those judges absent from the list are nonetheless implicitly included according to their equivalent faith they expressed in through belief in action. a. Gideon (Judges 6-8) Gideon was not perfect, he doubted God at times and at times demanded signs rather than trusting God’s clear direction. However he is perhaps best known for his trusting the Lord by sending away members of his fighting force reducing their number from 32,000 to 300 and then going to battle against a Midianite force of 50,000. b. Samson (Judges 13-16) Samson is known for many acts of strength in the defeat of Israel’s enemies, and for his ungodly lifestyle and lack of relational understanding of God and the role God had given him. However, he is listed here based on his repentant cry to God asking that he might use the last of his strength to tear down the pagan temple of the false god Dagon. c. Barak (Judges 4-5) The mention of Barak is in fact also a reference to the faith of Deborah and Yael. If not for the faith of Deborah, Barak would not have gone out to battle (Judges 4:8-9). And if not for the faith and courage of Yael the Kenite (not Israeli), Sisera the head of the enemy army would not have been captured and killed (Judges 4:16-23). This of course was ordered by God due to the initial doubting of Barak. However, Barak’s faith in the God of Deborah led to his entering saving faith and a personal relationship to God. Therefore, his faith is alluded to here as yet another example of repentant faith. d. Jephthah (Judges 11-12) Jephthah acted in sin by making a foolish vow, and then compounded his sin by acting on the sinful vow he had made. However, his faith in God enabled him and Israel’s armed forces to defeat the Ammonites. He is listed here to show the danger of allowing faithful vision to become clouded following victory. His faith is valid, but his lack of discernment in the aftermath of victory shows that at least for a time he took his eyes off of God and as a result he became responsible for the murder of his daughter. e. David’s life and faith are well documented and what stands out most is his consistent desire to be in intimate relationship with the Lord. Yes, David sinned and there were times when he distanced himself from God relationally by hardening his heart, but he was ever repentant, ever concerned with right relationship in God. David means “Beloved”, and He was one who loved God because God had first loved him. His truly repentant and all-consuming love for God is a wonderful example of true faith. f. Samuel’s life and actions are also well documented and his impeccable integrity unmatched. His faith actions included the slaying of Agag the king of the Amalekites (1 Samuel 15:32-33) in order to honour the instruction of God which Saul had failed to obey. Samuel was grieved according to the heart of God when Israel asked for a king, though they already had the King YHVH. However, even Samuel, one of the greatest of Israel’s prophets failed to raise his sons in righteousness. In fact, the cry of Israel for a king was in part due to the wickedness of Samuel’s sons (1 Sam. 8). Therefore, Samuel, like all those listed here (in one way or another), is listed as both an example and a warning. Those listed here are listed as both an example of true faith and as a warning against becoming distracted in faith. Further, they are listed as an example of the grace and mercy of God Who received these ones through Messiah in their repentance, and has given them access to everlasting life in Him. The warning is “Don’t allow yourself to become distracted in your faith, keep your eyes on Messiah Yeshua unto God, and if you do become distracted, return in faith and receive God’s mercy. 33 who in faith, trust, assurance, belief (pistis[G], ba-emunah[H]) conquered kingdoms, performed acts of righteousness, obtained promises, shut the mouths of lions, 34 quenched the power of fire, escaped the edge of the sword, from weakness were made strong, became mighty in war, put foreign armies to flight. 33 who in faith, trust, assurance, belief conquered kingdoms, performed acts of righteousness, obtained promises, shut the mouths of lions, 34 quenched the power of fire, escaped the edge of the sword, from weakness were made strong, became mighty in war, put foreign armies to flight. These verses affirm the fact that the writer is talking in general terms about the ancient and common faith of both individuals and the collective of Israel and those foreigners who joined with Israel through faith in the God of Israel. The deeds and accomplishments of both those already mentioned and others, who have not been mentioned by name are alluded to here in an effort to point to the One in Whom they have placed their trust, faith, certain belief. They have acted based on their faith, their right actions having come forth from God and being performed as acts of worship. “conquered kingdoms” Moses conquered the kingdoms of Sihon, king of the Amorites, and Og, king of Bashan (Num. 21:21-25). David conquered the kingdoms of Syria, Moab, Ammon, Amalek, Edom, and the Philistines (2 Sam. 8-12). “performed acts of righteousness, obtained promises” All mentioned qualify. “shut the mouths of lions” In response to Daniel’s faith God sent His angel to shut the mouths of the lions (Daniel 6:1-29). “quenched the power of fire” In response to the faith of Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego God quenched the power of fire (Daniel 3:1-30). “escaped the edge of the sword” Among others Elijah and Elisha escaped the edge of the sword (1 Kings 17:8-24; 2 Kings 6:31). “from weakness were made strong” This speaks of recovery from diseases and infirmity, such as was experienced by Hezekiah. It may also refer to the supernatural strength imparted to Samson. “became mighty in war,” Barak, Gideon, David, and many others. “put foreign armies to flight” Numerous pagan nations were put to flight by Joshua, the Judges, David, and others. We note that these victories and miraculous deliverances are followed in the next verses by the suffering, trials and deaths of others who were faithful. 35 Women received back their dead by resurrection (anastasis[G]); and others were tortured, not accepting their release, so that they might obtain a better resurrection (anastasis[G]); 36 and others experienced mocking and flogging, and further, chains and imprisonment. 35 Women received back their dead by resurrection; and others were tortured, not accepting their release, so that they might obtain a better resurrection; 36 and others experienced mocking and flogging, and further, chains and imprisonment. “Women received back their dead by resurrection” The widow of Zarephath and the woman of Shunem received back their dead resurrected by God through the faith of Elijah and Elisha (1 Kings 17:8-24; 2 Kings 4:8-37). Yeshua raised the son of the widow of Nain (Luke 7:11-17), the daughter of Jairus, a synagogue leader (Matthew 9:18-26; Mark 5:21-43), and Lazarus, the brother to Miriyam and Marta (John 11:1-44). “others were tortured, not accepting their release, so that they might obtain a better resurrection;” During the oppression of Israel by Antiochus Epiphanes the principle scribe Eleazer refused to compromise his faith and was executed believing he would obtain a better resurrection (2 Maccabees 6:18-31). The Mother and her seven sons all of whom died for their faith at the hand of the wicked Antiochus Epiphanes, hoped to attain a better resurrection (2 Maccabees 7). “Now when this man was dead also, they tormented and mangled the fourth in like manner. So when he was ready to die he said thus, It is good, being put to death by men, to look for hope from God to be raised up again by him: as for thee, thou shalt have no resurrection to life.” -2 Maccabees 7:13-14 (KJV) “others experienced mocking and flogging, and further, chains and imprisonment.” Many of the aforementioned were also flogged and chained, imprisoned and the like. Joseph was imprisoned (Gen. 39:20). Samson was chained, Micaiah the prophet was stuck (1 Kings 22:24) and Jeremiah imprisoned (Jeremiah 20:2-7; 37:15). John the immerser was imprisoned and died for his faith (Matthew 11:2–7, 14:6–12; Mark 1:14, 6:17–29; Luke 3:19–20, 7:18–25, 9:9; John 3:24; Jewish Antiquities 18. 5. 2.), and Yeshua himself also suffered all these things (John 19:1-3; Mark 15:1-9). 37 They were stoned, they were sawn in two, they were tempted, examined, proved (peirazō[G]), they were put to death with the sword; they went about in sheepskins, in goatskins, being destitute, afflicted, tormented 38 (people of whom the world was not worthy), wandering in deserts, on mountains, and sheltering in caves and holes in the ground. 37 They were stoned, they were sawn in two, they were tempted, examined, proved, they were put to death with the sword; they went about in sheepskins, in goatskins, being destitute, afflicted, tormented 38 (people of whom the world was not worthy), wandering in deserts, on mountains, and sheltering in caves and holes in the ground. “They were stoned” The righteous man Naboth was stoned to death by order of Ahab (1 Kings 21:13). By the command of Joash, Zechariah was stoned to death in the Temple court between the porch and the altar (2 Chron. 24:20-22; Matt. 23:35). Stephen the first Messianic Jewish martyr was stoned to death and died believing he would receive a better resurrection (Acts 7:59-60). “they were sawn in two” Outside of extra-Biblical Jewish tradition there is no record of servants of God being sawn in two. However, the words of Yeshua recorded in the New Testament infer that the punishment of sawing in two was familiar to the first century Jewish community (Matt. 24:50-51). Jewish tradition asserts that Isaiah the prophet was sawn in two at the command of Manasseh king of Judah: “The teachings of Rabbi Eliezer ben Ya’akov measure only a kav but are clean and accurate, and so the halakha is decided in accordance with his opinions. And it was written in it: Manasseh, king of Israel, killed Isaiah the prophet… Isaiah said to himself: I know him, i.e., Manasseh, that he will not accept whatever explanation that I will say to him to resolve my prophecies with the words of the Torah. And even if I say it to him, I will make him into an intentional transgressor since he will kill me anyway. Therefore, in order to escape, he uttered a divine name and was swallowed within a cedar tree. Manasseh’s servants brought the cedar tree and sawed through it in order to kill him. When the saw reached to where his mouth was, Isaiah died. He died specifically as this point due to that which he said: “In the midst of a people of unclean lips, I dwell” (Isaiah 6:5).” -Talmud Bavliy, Yevamot 49b .6 & .8 (The William Davidson Talmud) “they were tempted, examined, proved” All mentioned qualify. “they were put to death with the sword” Daniel 11:33 prophecies that righteous ones of understanding will die by the sword among other methods of executions. the priests at Nob died by the sword according to the order of king Saul (1 Sam. 22:18). The prophets of the Lord died by the sword at the order of Jezebel (Ahab) (1 Kings 18:22), and others suffered the same fate during the occupation of Israel by the forces of Antiochus Epiphanes. In the first century C.E. Yochanan (John) the Immerser (Baptist) was beheaded at the command of Herod the tetrarch (Matt. 14; Mark 6:14-29). “they went about in sheepskins, in goatskins, being destitute, afflicted, tormented 38 (people of whom the world was not worthy), wandering in deserts, on mountains, and sheltering in caves and holes in the ground.” This is an accurate observation of the life of Yochanan the Immerser (John the Baptist)[Matt. 3:4], and of the ancient prophets Elijah and Elisha (1 Kings 17:6, 18:4, 19:13; 2 Kings 2:14), and of the many Jews who fled the persecution of Antiochus Epiphanes (1 Maccabees 2:38). It can also be considered a description of Yeshua, Who had “nowhere to lay his head” (Luke 9:58). “And they kept the eight days with gladness, as in the feast of the tabernacles, remembering that not long afore they had held the feast of the tabernacles, when as they wandered in the mountains and dens like beasts.” -2 Maccabees 10:6 (KJV) 39 And all these, having gained a good report upon their faith (pistis[G], al-emunatam[H]), did not receive what was promised, messaged (epaggelia[G], hahavtachot[H]), 40 because the God (ho Theos[G], ha Elohiym[H]) had provided something better for us, so that apart from us they would not be made perfect, complete, consecrated (teleioō[G]). 39 And all these, having gained a good report upon their faith, did not receive what was promised, messaged, They each died not yet having come into the fullness of the promised eternal land, but seeing it from a distance in faith and being certain in hope of its future fulfilment. 40 because the God had provided something better for us, so that apart from us they would not be made perfect, complete, consecrated. The reason that the kingdom of God is revealed as now and yet to be fully manifest is that with regard to time and space God is allowing the fullness of chronology to reach its goal so that all who have, and all who will live and accept His loving offer of redemption, might share together in the completion, consecration and perfection of the body of Messiah. The “something better” referred to here is the entry into time and space of the King Messiah, Who by living perfectly, dying sacrificially and resurrecting victoriously, makes perfect in holiness all those who receive Him, past, present and future, so that together they become one people in right relationship with God and with one another. “so that apart from us they would not be made perfect” The righteousness of the tzadikim (saints) of the Tanakh (OT) is, like that of those of the time of the writing of this work, and like that of those of us who now receive it, purchased not by our works but by faith through grace, a gift of God made manifest through the saving work of Yeshua the King Messiah (Eph. 2:8-9). In short, no one is perfected except in Yeshua the King Messiah for the glory of God everlasting. Copyright 2021 Yaakov Brown Without doubt faith cannot exist, but for the believer, even our temporal doubts point to faith. Therefore, Messiah in us firmly establishes that which we hope for in Him. The One through Whom the seen things were created reveals to us the unseen reality of everlasting life through Him, in God the Father. Introduction:
It is for good reason that this chapter of the Book to the Hebrews is known as the faith chapter. The word faith is used 24 times and the phrase “in faith” (ba-emunah[H]) 21 times. What is abundantly clear is that faith in God through the King Messiah was, is and until His return, will be the only assurance of the certain hope of everlasting life. Without doubt faith cannot exist, but for the believer, even our temporal doubts point to faith. Therefore, Messiah in us firmly establishes that which we hope for in Him. The One through Whom the seen things were created reveals to us the unseen reality of everlasting life through Him, in God the Father. The writer of this work, inspired by the Ruach HaKodesh, gives numerous examples of the kind of faith he is speaking of, which is seen throughout Israel’s history and from before her inception in the lives of her God fearing forefathers. This is an encouragement to those suffering at the time of the writing of this work, and for we who are presently going through trials as followers of Yeshua, because it is evidence of faith maintained through trials, difficult circumstances, exile, wandering and loss. The first century Jewish followers of Yeshua, and we who are presently receiving Him, are instructed by this work to remember their forebears and hold on to their faith, trusting in God for the promised Olam Haba (world to come) in spite of their ability to see that inheritance with corporeal human sight. Last verses of Hebrews 10: 38 But My righteous one will live by faith; [Hab. 2:4] And if he shrinks back, My soul has no pleasure in him.” [LXX and a summation of Hab. 2:5-20] [Hebrew text of Habakkuk 2:4: “Behold, now, pay attention, he is lifted up (has drawn back through pride) and is not upright in his soul, behold, and the just/righteous, by his faith shall he live.”] 39 But we are not among those who draw back [through pride per Heb. Hab. 2:4] to destruction, damnation, but of those who have faith, trust, belief for obtaining the salvation, preservation of our souls. HEBREWS 11:1-20 (Author’s translation) 1Now the faith, trust, assurance, belief is hope established in the certainty of, that which stands under things that are evidence of what can’t be looked at with corporeal eyes. 2 For in it the elders, ancestors, fathers of old gained a good testimony. 3 In faith, trust, assurance, belief we understand that the worlds have been made, joined, perfected, framed in the spoken Word, essence of God so that what is seen with corporeal eyes, has not been made out of things that are visible. 4 In faith, trust, assurance, belief Hevel[H] [Abel] brought to the God a better sacrifice than Kayin[H] [Cain], through which he gained a good testimony that he was a righteous, just one, God testifying about his gifts, and through faith (it), though he is dead, he still speaks. 5 In faith, trust, assurance, belief Chanok[H] [Enoch] was translated, transferred so that he would not see, know death; and he was not found because God translated, transferred, took away him [Gen.5:24]; for before his translation, transference, he had this testimony that he pleased, was well with the God. 6 And without faith, trust, assurance, belief it is impossible to please, be well with God, for the one who comes near to the God must believe, trust that He exists, and that He proves to be a rewarder of those who diligently seek, search for Him. 7 In faith, trust, assurance, belief Noach[H], being warned by God about things not yet seen with corporeal eyes, in fear prepared an ark, box for the salvation of his household, by which he condemned the wickedness of the world, and became an heir of the righteousness which is according to the faith, trust, assurance, belief. 8 In faith, trust, assurance, belief Avraham[H] (Father of a great people), when he was called, to go to the land which he was to receive for an inheritance, obeyed; and he left, not knowing where he was going. 9 In faith, trust, assurance, belief he sojourned, lived as a foreigner in the land of the promise, message, as if in a foreign land, dwelling in tents with Yitzchak[H] [Isaac] and Yaakov[H] [Jacob], fellow heirs of the same promise, message; 10 for he was looking, expecting, waiting for the city which has foundations, whose architect and builder is the God. 11 In faith, trust, assurance, belief even Sarah[H] herself received strength, ability, miraculous power to conceive, make the foundation of a child being seeded brought forth when she was past age, because she considered Him faithful Who had promised, messaged. 12 Therefore even from one man, and one who was as good as dead, there were birthed descendants who were as the stars of heavens in multitudes, and as the sand by the seashore, uncountable. 13 All these died in faith, trust, assurance, belief, without receiving the promises, but having seen, known, understood from a distance, and were persuaded, had confidence, trusted, and embraced, welcomed, greeted them, having professed that they were strangers and exiles, resident foreigners in the land. 14 For those who say such things make it clear that they are seeking a native land. 15 And certainly if they had been remembering the land which they left, they would have had a season, opportunity, an affinity for returning. 16 But now, they desire a better land, that is, a heavenly one. Therefore the God is not ashamed to be called their God; for He has prepared a city for them. 17 In faith, trust, assurance, belief Avraham[H], when he was examined, proved, brought up Yitzchak[H] [Isaac], and the one who had received the promises was offering up his only son; 18 it was he to whom it was said, “Through Yitzchak[H] your seed shall be called.” [Gen. 21:12] 19 He considered that the God is able to raise people even from the dead, from which he also received him back as a type, figure, parable. 20 In faith, trust, assurance, belief Yitzchak[H] blessed Yaakov[H] and Esav[H], even regarding things to come. HEBREWS 11:1-20 (line upon line) 1Now the faith, trust, assurance, belief (pistis[G], ha-emunah[H]) is hope (elpizo[G]) established in the certainty (hupostasis[G]) of, that which stands under things (pragma[G], devariym[H]) that are evidence (elegchos[G]) of what can’t be looked at with corporeal eyes (blepo[G], niriym[H]). 2 For in it the elders, ancestors, fathers of old (presbuteros[G], ha’avot[H]) gained a good testimony (martureō[G], shehuadah[H]). 3 In faith, trust, assurance, belief (pistis[G], ba-emunah[H]) we understand (noieo[G], naviyn[H]) that the worlds (aion[G], haolamot[H]) have been made, joined, perfected, framed (katartizō[G], na’asu[H]) in the spoken Word, essence (rhema[G], bidvar[H]) of God (Theos[G], ha-Elohiym[H]) so that what is seen with corporeal eyes (blepo[G], hanireh[H]), has not been made out of things that are visible (phainō[G], min-hanelam[H]). 1Now the faith, trust, assurance, belief is hope established in the certainty of, that which stands under things that are evidence of what can’t be looked at with corporeal eyes. The Greek pistis is equivalent to the Hebrew emunah and conveys more than mental assent or belief in an idea. The faith being spoken of here is a committed, ongoing, assurance of belief and trust in God through Yeshua the King Messiah. Faith in Yeshua does not fear doubt but consumes it turning it into fuel for the fire of certainty. Because faith is given to the believer by God it is returned to God in relationship. No one can come to the Father except through Yeshua and no one can receive Yeshua except by the revelation of the Ruach HaKodesh (Holy Spirit) Who is the Spirit of the Father and the Son. We love Him because He first loved us (with an everlasting love), we have faith in Him because He created in us the possibility of faith. Faith, as the text says, is “hope established in certainty”! Certainty is possible only because God exists and has subjugated chaos, a symptom of rebellion, made possible by the need for freewill in order for love to be manifest and reciprocated. Our hope in Messiah is established in the foundation of those things unseen, eternal, of the Creator, things preceding and succeeding or proceeding after the sin affected created order. Faith in God through Yeshua is itself the evidence of the promised inheritance of eternal life in God. This sets the stage for the remainder of this chapter and a good portion of the following chapter. This faith gives the believer the ability to see in spirit what cannot be seen with corporeal human sight. Just as wind is evidence of the existence of unseen air, so faith is evidence of the life giving Spirit of God. Faith is the wind of the new creation, evidence of a form of air so pure that it cannot be polluted. Put simply: Faith, trust, committed belief, is being certain of what we hope for and convinced of what we cannot presently see with corporeal human sight. As proof the writer of the Book to the Hebrews goes on to give examples of this same faith made manifest in the God fearing forefathers of Israel. Showing that the faith in question transcends the boundaries of time and space because the God in Whom this faith is placed is unbound by the sin affected created order. 2 For in it the elders, ancestors, fathers of old gained a good testimony. The faith of the God fearing forefathers of Israel is a good testimony offered to encourage the recipients of this work. The faith of the forefathers, like the saving faith in Messiah Yeshua, is a faith that endures hardship, persecution, even disappointment of not seeing a certain thing come to pass in this temporal life. It is a transcendent faith that will yet see its reward. The faith in question is faith in God through the King Messiah Yeshua. Therefore, when the text says, “For in it (faith) the fathers of old gained good report”, it means that the fathers of Israel had faith in the King Messiah prior to His entry into time and space as the virgin born Son of God. Just one of many instances where systematic dispensationalism falls apart at the seams. The example of the forefathers affirms the teaching of the Book to the Hebrews, which makes a connection between faith and salvation (Heb. 11:7), and between faith and pleasing God (Heb. 11:5-6). It is unwise to say as some do that “faith is the sole base for human merit”. This borders on blasphemy. Human merit results from Messiah’s merit and is made possible through faith, but not by it. We are saved “by grace through faith” (Eph. 2:8-9) and according to that faith we are accredited the righteousness of Messiah, and not our own righteousness. When the Scripture says, “And he (Avraham) believed, trusted in the LORD and he (The Lord) counted it (faith in Messiah) to him for righteousness.” (Gen. 15:6; Rom. 4:3) It is saying that Avraham received God’s redemptive offer in Messiah before Messiah was born and that Avraham therefore received the righteousness of Messiah as a result of that faith. Faith was the vehicle, Messiah’s blood was the means. 3 In faith, trust, assurance, belief we understand that the worlds have been made, joined, perfected, framed in the spoken Word, essence of God so that what is seen with corporeal eyes, has not been made out of things that are visible. “1In the beginning (En arkhay[G] In the Origin, Be’reishit[H] In the head/front/Leader) was the Word, Essence, Substance, Utterance, Manifestation (Logos[G], Davar[H], Memra[RA], Miltha[A]) and the Word was with the God (Ho-Theos[G], Ha-Elohim[H]), and God was that Word. 2 The same was in the beginning with the God.” -John 1:1-2 (Author’s translation) Yochanan firmly anchors his Gospel account in the Torah (Books of Moses) and the wider body of Hebrew Scripture the Tanakh (OT). Both Genesis (Tanakh) and John (NT) begin (no pun intended) with the phrase “In the Beginning”. This is why the Hebrew title of the book of Genesis is Be’reishit, which is the first word of Genesis, a compound word made up of Ba (In the) and Reishit (From Rosh, meaning head, leader, front). It is interesting to note that this theme of beginning influenced the Egyptian Coptic order of the New Testament, which places John at the beginning. The Egyptian Coptic New Testament Gospels book order being John, Matthew, Mark, Luke. With regard to the Hebrew text of both Be’reishit (Genesis) and Yochanan (John), we may read Be’reishit as, “In the Head”, the “Head” of the Universe (All creation) being YHVH, God Himself. Therefore, as in the case of Genesis, John’s Gospel begins in God, the Creator and Head of all things. This is of significance to Messiah followers, who have accepted that Yeshua our King Messiah is the “Head” of the body of believers (Ephesians 5:23). “In the beginning was the Word” (John. 1:1) is synonymous with “In the beginning… Elohim said (spoken Word)” (Gen. 1:1, 3). Thus, John establishes the all existing, uncreated, pre-existent nature of the Word. The Word being the manifest essence of God Himself, anthropomorphically issuing from God’s mouth. The alternative Orthodox Jewish English translation of Genesis 1:1, which reads, “When God began to create…” further establishing the existence of the Word prior to all of the created order. The Hebrew text of Genesis 1:1 reads: “Be’reishit In the beginning (head) bara creating (from nothing), Elohim God (Judge) et (Aleph-Tav, the Alphabet, that which forms all words), ha-shamayim the heavens v’et (and Aleph-Tav) ha-aretz the earth (land).” “I am the Aleph and the Tav, the First and the Last, the Beginning and the goal… I, Yeshua, have sent my messenger to give you this testimony for the believing communities. I am the Root and the Offspring of David, and the bright Morning Star.” - Revelation 22:13, 16 (Author’s translation) Therefore, the remez (hint) found in the “et” (Aleph-Tav) of Genesis 1:1, is a further illumination of the words of Yochanan (John) 1:1, and points us to Yeshua. God is seen throughout the Tanakh (OT) creating, calling, instructing and relating through His Word. Yishayahu (Isaiah) says: “Kiy ka’asher yeireid For as the coming down of hageshem the rain vehasheleg and the snow min-hashamayim from the heavens ve’shamah and there lo yashuv do not return kiy until they hirvah satiate, satisfy the thirst of et-haaretz the earth (land), veholiydah and it brings forth vehitzmiychah and sprouts, venatan and gives zera seed lazoreia to the sower velechem and bread laocheil to the eater, Kein yihyeh So will it come to pass that Devariy My Word asher yeitzei which goes out mipiy from My mouth; lo-yashuv will not return eiliy to Me reiykam void, empty, vainly, kiy for im-asah rather, it will accomplish, make, fashion (asah, from something) that which chafatztiy I delight in, desire, am pleased with, take pleasure in, vehitzliyach and will rush, advance, prosper, succeed in asher that for which shelachtiyv I sent it.” -Isaiah 55:10-11 (Author’s translation) “the Word was with the God, and God was that Word.” The writer is clear, the Word is both with God and at the same time God. Contrary to popular teaching, this was not an entirely alien concept in first century Judaism. The idea of the Word (Logos[G], Davar[H] Memra[RA], Miltha[A]) being intrinsically linked to God was not a foreign concept to first century Judaism. Philo of Alexandria a.k.a Yedideyah Ha-Cohen (Jedidiah the priest), a Jewish philosopher who lived from 20 B.C.E (B.C) to 50 C.E (A.D) wrote: “The most universal of all things is God; and in second place, the word of God.” -Philo of Alexandria Allegorical Interpretation II, 86 The Aramaic Jerusalem Targum, codified in the second century C.E (A.D) renders the text of Genesis 3:8 as: “…they heard the voice of the word of the Lord God walking in the garden… and Adam and his wife hid themselves from before the Lord God among the trees of the garden.” -Jerusalem Targum (Genesis 3:8) Using the Rabbinical Aramaic word Memra in place of the Hebrew Davar in the same Aramaic Targum, the writer renders Genesis 19:24 as: “And the Word (Memra) of the Lord Himself had made to descend upon the people of Sodom and Gomora… fire from before the Lord from the heavens.” -Jerusalem Targum 19:24 The Talmud also understands the Messiah as pre-existent, though not all existing/uncreated: “It was taught that seven things were created before the world was created; they are the Torah, repentance, the Garden of Eden, Gehinnom, the Throne of Glory, the Temple, and the name of the Messiah… The name of the Messiah, as it is written: ‘May his name (Messiah) endure forever, may his name produce issue prior to the sun’ (Psalm 72:17).” -Pesachim 54a, N’darim 39a; and Midrash on Psalm 93:3 The Jewish convert and commentator Onkelos wrote the following paraphrase (110 C.E/A.D) in his commentary on Genesis 28:20: "if the word of the Lord will be my help, and will keep me, the word of the Lord shall be my God:” -Paraphrase Genesis 28:20 Onkelos (35-120 CE/AD) The second century Targums of Yonatan and Yerushalayim paraphrase certain texts as referring to the Memra (Word[RA]): "I will cause the glory of my Shekinah to dwell among you, and my word shall be your God, the Redeemer;” -Targum Yonatan Leviticus 26:12 "out of thee, before me, shall come forth the Messiah, that he may exercise dominion over Israel; whose name is said from eternity, from the days of old.” -Targum Yonatan Micah 5:2 "ye have made the word of the Lord king over you this day, that he may be your God:” -Targum Yerushalayim Deuteronomy 26:17 In stating that “the Word was with the God, and God was that Word” Yochanan is expressing the Hebrew understanding of “both and” rather than the limited Greco-Roman thinking of “either or”. In this respect Yochanan’s Gospel establishes itself in Biblical Hebrew thought from the outset. Therefore, failing to understand Yochanan’s words from a Hebraic mindset will lead to misinterpretation and limited understanding on the part of the student of this Gospel. “He (Yeshua) is wrapped in a garment immersed in blood, and He is called by the name Ho-Logos[G] (Ha-Davar[H]) the Word, Ho-Theos[G] (Ha-Elohim[H]) the God.” -Revelation 19:13 (Author’s translation) Yeshua (YHVH Saves), Ha-Davar (the Word, Essence) Ha-Elohim (the God, Judge, Ruler) Imanu (With us) El (God). For further study see my article on the Gospel according to John Chapter 1: https://www.bethmelekh.com/yaakovs-commentary---15081497151214931513-1497150615111489/yochanan-the-good-news-according-to-john-introduction-chapter-1 so that what is seen with corporeal eyes, has not been made out of things that are visible. God has neither beginning nor end, He is eternal, all existing, not created. Yeshua likewise is all existing, not created. God is one. The things created within the created order have a beginning and must be made from something, matter, substance, something. But God created the natural order from nothing, the Latin ex nihilo describing well the meaning of the action described in Genesis 1:1 “Berieshit bara Elohiym” The writer of the Book to the Hebrews explains that this cannot be understood by any other means than faith in God through Messiah. In other words, science can’t comprehend it, intellectual acumen can’t comprehend it, philosophy can’t comprehend it. Only the faith described here can comprehend the creation. We see the truth of this in the inability of scientists, even first cause scientists, to explain how something can be created out of nothing. They cannot, they will not. God has explained it already. It is an understanding of faith, something that all the intellectual prowess in the world put together could never conceive of. 4 In faith, trust, assurance, belief (pistis[G], ba-emunah[H]) Hevel[H] [Abel] (vapour) brought (prospherō[G]) to the God (ho Theos[G], leiElohiym[H]) a better sacrifice (thusia[G], zevach tov[H]) than Kayin[H] (Cain) (spear), through which he gained a good testimony (martureō[G], l’eidot[H]) that he was (einai[G]) a righteous, just one (dikaios[G], tzadiyk[H]), God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]) testifying (martureō[G], behaiyd[H]) about his gifts (dōron[G], al-minchotayv[H]), and through faith (it), though he is dead (apothnēskō[G], moto[H]), he still speaks (laleō[G], achareiy[H]). 4 In faith, trust, assurance, belief Hevel[H] [Abel] brought to the God a better sacrifice than Kayin[H] [Cain], through which he gained a good testimony that he was a righteous, just one, God testifying about his gifts, and through faith (it), though he is dead, he still speaks. Genesis 4:1-16 gives the account of Cain and Abel. The writer begins his list of faithful servants of God with Abel because he is the first example in Torah, following the fall of humanity, of one who acts in faith according to the redemptive purposes of God. “In faith, trust, assurance, belief Abel brought to the God a better sacrifice than Cain” Abel’s sacrifice was of a first born of his flock and the fat (best) portions, a blood sacrifice for the atonement of sin, meaning that he understood that without the shedding of blood there could be no atonement. Therefore, his sacrifice was better than that of Cain, who brought vegetables, and by implication, not the best of his harvest. Some protest the treatment of Cain, saying, “If all he had to give was fruit, why did the Lord not accept Cain’s offering?” (Gen. 4:4-5)The answer is not in the impugning of God’s character but in the evidence provided in the text concerning the fruit (pun intended) of the faith of Cain verses the fruit of the faith of Abel. The text of the Torah explains that while Cain brought an offering “from the fruit of the ground”, Abel brought an offering “from the firstborn of his flock and from their fat portions.” By implication Cain did not bring the best of his produce whereas not only did Abel bring the best but he also understood by faith that blood atonement was needed. The later instructions of Torah given at Sinai concerning offerings performed by the Levitical priesthood affirm the fact that with the exception of grain offerings, fruit and vegetables are not offered on the altar. The spiritual knowledge Abel possessed could only have come from intimate relationship with God through faith, whereas the actions of Cain show him to be in rebellion against God. Nonetheless, God affords Cain and opportunity for repentance (Gen. 4:6-7), and Cain goes directly out after hearing the instruction from God to act rightly and instead murders his brother Abel (Gen. 4:8). “10 By this the children of God and the children of the devil are obvious: [d]anyone who does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor the one who does not love his brother and sister. 11 For this is the message which you have heard from the beginning, that we are to love one another; 12 not as Cain, who was of the evil one and murdered his brother. And for what reason did he murder him? Because his own deeds were evil, but his brother’s were righteous.” -1 John 3:10-12 (NASB) “God testifying about his gifts” (Gen. 4:4-5) God accepted Abel and his offering but did not accept the offering of unfaithful Cain. “though he is dead, he still speaks.” His faithful actions still speak to us. Additionally, and metaphorically, the blood of Abel still cries out from the ground along with the blood of all those who have suffered death at the hands of the unjust (Gen. 4:10; Matt. 23:35; ). The focus here is on the faith of Abel, and the unspoken counterpoint is that of the faithlessness of Cain. Abel’s faith, trust and belief brought the kind of sacrifice that pointed to the coming of the Messiah and His eternally effective sacrifice. Therefore the good testimony and acceptance Abel received from God was not because of the sacrifice Abel offered, nor his faith but because he received God’s redemptive offer in Messiah before Messiah was born. Abel therefore, received the righteousness of Messiah as a result of his faith. Faith and sacrifice were the response of Abel to the redemptive offer of God, Messiah’s blood was the means of Abel’s reconciliation. Faith in God is reliant on God, whereas faith in and of itself is incapable of producing a reliable result. 5 In faith, trust, assurance, belief (pistis[G], ba-emunah[H]) Chanok[H] [Enoch] (dedicated, inaugurated) was translated, transferred (metatithēmi[G]) so that he would not see, know (eido[G], reoto[H]) death (Thanatos[G], hamavet[H]); and he was not found because God translated, transferred, took away (metatithēmi[G], lakach[H]) him [Gen.5:24]; for before his translation, transference (metathesis[G]), he had this testimony (martureō[G], vehuad[H]) that he pleased, was well with (euaresteō[G]) the God (ho Theos[G], haElohiym[H]). 6 And without faith, trust, assurance, belief (pistis[G], emunah[H]) it is impossible to please, be well with (euaresteō[G]) God, for the one who comes near (proserchomai[G]) to the God (ho Theos[G], haElohiym[H]) must believe, trust (pisteuō[G], sheya’amiyn[H]) that He exists, and that He proves to be a rewarder of those who diligently seek, search for (ekzēteō[G]) Him. 5 In faith, trust, assurance, belief Chanok[H] [Enoch] was translated, transferred so that he would not see, know death; and he was not found because God translated, transferred, took away him [Gen.5:24]; for before his translation, transference, he had this testimony that he pleased, was well with the God. “And walked Chanok with the Elohiym and he was not, for Elohiym took him away” -Bereishit (Genesis) 5:24 The list of faithful ones began with Abel who offered a blood sacrifice acknowledging the need for atonement, and continues with an example of one who based on that atonement is translated so that death is overcome. This is the very essence of the Gospel played out in the historical account of individuals of true faith. Through His blood Messiah has swallowed up death with victory. Chanok, whose name means “dedicated”, was both dedicated to God in relationship (the true definition of love) and is a sign for future believers of God’s dedication to them and His dedicating of a people redeemed through the blood of His son, prefigured in the sacrifice offered by Abel. Many pause here to argue the finer details of Chanok’s translation in order to work out how they too might translate. That is a mistake. Becoming enamoured by the ability to transfer or translate is idolatry. Chanok was not concerned with translating but with God. The supernatural and miraculous signs that God performs upon, within and around the righteous are not the result of the practices of the righteous but of the relationship God has with those righteous ones, who have received righteousness in Messiah and not of their own works. Those who seek to emulate miracles rather than focus on God in Messiah, will eventually, if unrepentant, become like those spoken of by Yeshua: “22 Many will say to Me on that day, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many [a]miracles?’ 23 And then I will declare to them, ‘I never knew you; leave Me, you who practice lawlessness.’” -Matthew 7:22-23 (NASB) Motivation is key because it is the fruit of the heart (core being). A good tree cannot bear bad fruit. With regard to lawlessness, the only thing worse than practicing witchcraft, is using the Scripture as a tool for practice witchcraft and then calling is Christianity. Note that Chanok “was well with God”. This regards his relationship in God. God’s testimony of Chanok has to do with right relationship, not deeds. The Jerusalem Targum (2nd Century Aramaic text) agrees that Chanok was translated by the Word (Yeshua) of God. "and Enoch worshipped in truth before the Lord; and lo, he was not, for he was translated by the Word from before the Lord;'' -Targum Yerushalayim As an aside, it is important to note that Chanok is not said to ascend but to have been “taken away”. Those who claim that he ascended are misreading the Biblical texts. 6 And without faith, trust, assurance, belief it is impossible to please, be well with God, for the one who comes near to the God must believe, trust that He exists, and that He proves to be a rewarder of those who diligently seek, search for Him. “without faith, trust, assurance, belief it is impossible to please, be well with God,” The English word “please” and the phrase “be well with” are synonymous ways of translating the Greek euaresteō. In short, where the writer of this text uses the Greek euaresteō he is denoting right relationship in God rather than a form of pleasing that results from winning approval. In Messiah we are approved and as a result we act in a pleasing way. The reverse is not true. “for the one who comes near to the God must believe, trust that He exists” This is both simple and profound. The child comprehends it but the self-convinced atheist does not. To call Atheism rational is delusional. It is entirely irrational to disregard even the smallest possibility of deity. Few things are as intellectually dishonest as the philosophy of Atheism. Even those who believe in a God or gods have their doubts. Without doubt faith is impossible. On the other hand Atheism claims no doubt, but is absolutely certain that what is possible (God) is impossible. The agnostic may be slightly more honest but is nonetheless equally deluded. To be indefinitely undecided is as intellectually dishonest as being firmly convinced of a lie. We note that belief in the One true God of Israel is being addressed here, and not belief in any other form of deity or first cause or science or philosophy. “and that He proves to be a rewarder of those who diligently seek, search for Him.” Our faith in God through Messiah is never asked of us blindly. We have proof that He rewards those who diligently seek Him. Throughout the history of the Jewish people we have seen God’s faithful acts of love and provision born of His holiness. “He proves to be a rewarder of those who diligently seek Him”. And what is diligence? The practice of those who are committed to love relationship with Him through Messiah. “28 Therefore they said to Him, “What shall we do, make, so that we may be working, trading in, performing the works, tasks, deeds of the God?” 29 Yeshua answered and said to them, “This is the work, task, deed of the God, that you continue to believe, trust, have faith in Him Whom He has sent.” -Habesorah Al Piy Yochanan 6:28-29 (YBY translation) “Therefore” Because Yeshua had offered eternal life above and beyond the miraculous sign they had witnessed of Him. And, because they had some sense of Yeshua’s authority based on His signs and words. “What shall we do, make, so that we may be working, trading in, performing the works, tasks, deeds of the God?” The question shows that they have not understood Yeshua at all. Yeshua is offering redemption, relationship, eternal life, the strength of God at work in them, a gift to be received, but the people are looking for something they can build, accomplish, achieve in their own strength in order to make them right with God. Their focus is on “doing” rather than “being”. They say, “What shall we do, so that we can accomplish the works of God” and Yeshua completely reverses their question and defeats their paradigm with a very simple and eternally profound instruction: “The works of God are this, that you continue to believe in Him Whom He has sent”. In short, “Be in Me, don’t do for Me. Your doing must come from Me.” Objects are for use, persons are for relationship. Many fall from the faith because they do not understand this simple truth. Many more retain faith but become burned out and unfruitful because they don’t understand this simple truth. Yeshua is pointing His hearers back to the Torah and the Word (ha-Davar: John 1:1) of God spoken to their forebears through Moses: “For near to you all is Ha-Davar (The Word), meod, very much so, in your mouth, and in your inner being, so that you might accomplish, do, act accordingly.” -D’variym (Words) Deuteronomy 30:14 Notice that The Word is offered to the inner person and that it is from the strength of The Word in each one that each one works, accomplishes, acts. Yeshua is Ha-Davar, the Word, Essence, Substance of God, with us. It is interesting to note that by summing up the 613 commandments of the Torah with this one phrase “the just shall live by his faith” (Hab.2:4), the Talmud agrees with Yeshua’s assertion that to have faith is the work of God (Talmud Bavliy Makkot, fol. 23. 2. & 24. 1.) “And you will seek Me and find Me when you search for Me with all your heart.” -Jeremiah 29:13 (NASB) 7 In faith, trust, assurance, belief (pistis[G], ba-emunah[H]) Noach[H] (rest), being warned (chrēmatizō[G]) by God about things (devariym[H]) not yet seen with corporeal eyes (blepo[G], niriym[H]), in fear (eulabeomai[G], nizhar[H]) prepared an ark, box (kibōtos[G]) for the salvation (sōtēria[G], l’hatziyl[H]) of his household (oikos[G], beiyto[H]), by which he condemned the wickedness of (katakrinō[G], vayarsha[H]) the world (kosmos[G], haolam[H]), and became an heir of the righteousness (hatz’dakah[H]) which is according to the faith, trust, assurance, belief (pistis[G], ha-emunah[H]). 7 In faith, trust, assurance, belief Noach[H], being warned by God about things not yet seen with corporeal eyes, in fear prepared an ark, box for the salvation of his household, by which he condemned the wickedness of the world, and became an heir of the righteousness which is according to the faith, trust, assurance, belief. God’s warning is evidence of His faithfulness. Noah’s obedience is evidence of his relational faith in God. Noah, living in a landlocked region, nonetheless obeyed God in spite of how foolish his actions may have seemed, even to his own family. Like Noah the faith of the first century Jewish Messiah followers must grapple with the reality that they cannot see with human eyes what the future holds. This is also true of all believers today. We need not hear God’s audible voice or see some vision in order to determine what He is saying. His Word both written and living continues to speak to us. Are we listening and acting? We note that Noah understood the building of the ark as a vehicle for the salvation of his household and that by building it in obedience to God his right action sealed the fate of the wicked. Likewise, those who receive Messiah, by doing so affirm the fate of those who reject Messiah. This is why those who reject Messiah have such great hatred for the believer. Being aware of the emptiness of their own false deities and philosophies, they despise those who live lives of certain hope in Messiah. “The believer in Him is not separated, condemned, put asunder: but the disbeliever, one who has chosen disbelief is separated, condemned, put asunder already, because he has not believed, trusted in, become convinced of the name, identity of the One and only begotten the Son of the God.” -John 3:18 (Author’s translation) Righteous behaviour is an indictment against sin: “Therefore if your enemy hungers, feed him; if he thirsts, give him drink: for by doing so you will heap coals of fire on his head (judgement). Be not overcome with evil, but overcome evil with good.” -Romans 12:20-21 (Author’s translation) It is interesting to note that Jewish tradition records that Noah preached repentance to his generation (Mekhilta Shirah 5; Sifre Num. 23; Talmud Bavliy Sanhedrin 108a - b; Pirke R. El. 22.) Noah is the first person that the Torah calls “righteous” (Gen. 6:9). Like Enoch, Noah “walked with God”, a phrase denoting right relationship. We note that in one sense the ark or box built by Noah reflects a coffin and that Noah and his family passed through the waters (a symbol of the domain of the departed – Sheol) and into life. The history of Noah and the flood is one of the many immersions (baptisms) throughout Scripture that allude to death and resurrection, and point to the redemptive work of Yeshua the King Messiah. 8 In faith, trust, assurance, belief (pistis[G], ba-emunah[H]) Avraham[H] (Father of a great people), when he was called (kaleō[G], nikra[H]), to go to the land (ha’aretz[H]) which he was to receive for an inheritance, obeyed (hupakouō[G]); and he left, not knowing where he was going. 9 In faith, trust, assurance, belief (pistis[G], ba-emunah[H]) he sojourned, lived as a foreigner (paroikeō[G]) in the land (be’eretz[H]) of the promise, message (epaggelia[G], hahavtachah[H]), as if in a foreign land (allotrios[G]), dwelling (katoikeō[G], vayishev[H]) in tents (skēnē[G], beohaliym[H]) with Yitzchak[H] [Isaac] (he laughs) and Yaakov[H] [Jacob] (follower), fellow heirs of the same promise, message (epaggelia[G], hahavtachah[H]); 8 In faith, trust, assurance, belief Avraham[H] (Father of a great people), when he was called, to go to the land which he was to receive for an inheritance, obeyed; and he left, not knowing where he was going. The prophet Nehemiah (Neh. 9:7-8) extols the faith of Avraham and shows that God’s promise of land as an inheritance is connected to that faith. In the context of the present text that inheritance is an everlasting land, the Ha Aretz of the new creation and the Olam Haba (world to come). Avraham stepped out in faith, having already experienced the faithfulness of God, to go somewhere he wasn’t even sure existed, but trusted God for its existence. Therefore, our faith in God through Yeshua concerning the world to come is no different. Avraham’s faithful obedience: “Now the LORD said to Abram, “Go from your country and your kindred and your father's house to the land that I will show you. And I will make of you a great nation, and I will bless you and make your name great, so that you will be a blessing. I will bless those who bless you, and him who dishonours you I will curse, and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.” So Abram went, as the LORD had told him, and Lot went with him. Abram was seventy-five years old when he departed from Haran.” -Genesis 12:1-4 Avraham, father of faith (Romans 4; Galatians 3) 9 In faith, trust, assurance, belief he sojourned, lived as a foreigner in the land of the promise, message, as if in a foreign land, dwelling in tents with Yitzchak[H] [Isaac] and Yaakov[H] [Jacob], fellow heirs of the same promise, message; Avraham is used as the ultimate example of true faith in the Jewish tradition (Sirach 44:19-21; 1 Macc. 2:52; Genesis Rabah 43; Mekhilta Mishpatim 18). When Avraham arrived in Canaan God said, "I will give this land to your seed" (Gen. 12:7). Soon after God said, "I will give it to you and your seed forever" (Gen. 13:15). God’s promise to give the ethnic-religious people of Israel the land of Israel is both for the present world and for the world to come. At the judgement, all the liberal Christian whining concerning the modern state of Israel will be silenced by this transcendent reality, when they discover that God invented Zionism (in the truest sense), and intends to perpetuate it in the world to come. The text of Hebrews emphasises the future orientation of Avraham’s faith in God by highlighting his response to God’s call for Avraham to walk toward the unseen. Just as the Shabbat and the land of Israel are earlier used as metaphors for the world to come (Heb. 3 - 4), so too here Avraham’s faith journey is used as a metaphor for all believers, first the Jew and also the nations. Avraham lived as a guest in the land that was to belong to his descendants, as did Isaac and Jacob, fellow heirs to that same promise. This text affirms the passing on of the covenant made with Avraham to Isaac and Jacob and therefore, Israel. It also emphasises the fact that the fullness of the promise is yet to be realised. Therefore, like Avraham the first century Jewish followers of Messiah are living as guests in the land of Israel which will one day be theirs forever. Likewise, all believers are living as guests in a sin affected world that will one day be translated, a new creation, in which all believers will dwell forever in God through Messiah Yeshua. Many are forcefully displaced, but Avraham, in faith chose to be displaced according to God’s promise of a better place. “Yet he gave him no inheritance in it, not even a foot's length, but promised to give it to him as a possession and to his offspring after him, though he had no child.” -Acts 7:5 (ESV) How can God fulfil His promise to Avraham if Avraham is dead? “And as for the resurrection of the dead, have you not read what was said to you by God: ‘I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob’? He is not the God of the dead, but of the living.” -Matthew 22:31-32 10 for he was looking, expecting, waiting (ekdechomai[G], chikah[H]) for the city (polis [G], laiyr[H]) which has foundations (themelios[G], yesudatah[H]), whose architect (technitēs[G]) and builder (dēmiourgos[G]) is the God (ho Theos[G], haElohiym[H]). 11 In faith, trust, assurance, belief (pistis[G], ba-emunah[H]) even Sarah[H] (princess, noble woman, woman ruler) herself received strength, ability, miraculous power (dunamis[G], koach[H]) to conceive, make the foundation of a child (katabolē[G]) being seeded (sperma[G], lehazriya[H]) brought forth (tiktō[G], vateiled[H]) when she was past age, because she considered (hēgeomai[G]) Him faithful (pistos[G], lene’eman[H]) Who had promised, messaged (epaggellō[G], hamavtiyach[H]). 10 for he was looking, expecting, waiting for the city which has foundations, whose architect and builder is the God. The writer of the Book to the Hebrews inspired by the Ruach HaKodesh is thinking here as a Jew. He is acknowledging the p’shat (plain meaning) both as Avraham understood the promise to apply to the physical land and as the text explains that same promise. But he also sees a remez (hint) at a sod (mystery) that he believes Avraham also saw. That is, the promised transcendent city of God (the New Jerusalem [Heb. 12:22; 13:14; Rev. 21]) and the land it would inhabit in the Olam Haba (world to come). Therefore, Avraham’s faith in God and His promise meant that Avraham saw the future physical fulfilment as well as the future and eternal metaphysical fulfilment. And, in order for this to be true Avraham must also have seen and received the King Messiah Yeshua through Whom the future fulfilment is made possible. Yeshua Himself confirms that this is so: “Your father Avraham was overjoyed that he would see My day, and he saw it and rejoiced.” So the Judean (leaders) said to Him, “You are not yet fifty years old, and You have seen Avraham?” Yeshua said to them, “B’emet, b’emet, amein, amein, it is certainly true, I say to you, before Avraham was born, I AM.” -John 8:56-58 (Author’s translation) 11 In faith, trust, assurance, belief even Sarah[H] herself received strength, ability, miraculous power to conceive, make the foundation of a child being seeded brought forth when she was past age, because she considered Him faithful Who had promised, messaged. Ref. Genesis 18:9-15; 21:1-8 Although Sarah’s first response to the promised child was one of doubt, the Genesis account implies repentance on her part, a turning toward God in faith following her initial doubt. When challenged concerning her disbelief Sarah responded with integrity and chose faith. In many ways she is as great an example of faith as Avraham, for no one can be reconciled to God except in repentance. Great faith is repentant faith. Here the faith of Sarah is attested to as being of the nature of Avraham’s faith. In faith Sarah received the ability to conceive. “she considered Him (God) faithful Who had promised…” Avraham physically seeded the egg in Sarah’s womb, but it was God Who made the pregnancy possible (though she had already gone through menopause) and Sarah accepted the possibility because she trusted God. If not for Sarah’s faith in God Avraham’s faith in God would not have seen it’s hope made certain. “received strength” In Hebrew Scripture “strength” can be a euphemism for “seed/sperm” (ex. Prov. 31:3). Therefore, Sarah received the seed (sperm) of Avraham because she believed, trusted, had faith in God to do the miraculous. Notice then that it is the combined faith of Avraham and Sarah that God seeds the promised progeny (child). The birth of Isaac is evidence of the promise yet to be fulfilled. It is foolish to argue as some do in favour of the present verse referring to Avraham’s faith (based on the vulgate and oriental translations – neither of which are original Scripture texts) because the authoritative text specifically says,“she considered Him (God) faithful Who had promised…”. It’s the worst kind of misogynistic foolishness to seek to rob Sarah of honour concerning her faith in HaShem. The promises of God are manifest in Adam and Eve, Avraham and Sarah, Joseph and Miriyam. Man is humanity, “So God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.” -Genesis 1:27 (NASB) Those who promote man over woman misrepresent God’s image and fail to properly understand the order and glory of creation. 12 Therefore even from one man (mei’echad[H]), and one who was as good as dead (nekroō[G], lamavet[H]), there were birthed (gennaō[G]) descendants who were as the stars of heavens (ouranos[G], hashamayim[H]) in multitudes (plēthos[G]), and as the sand (ammos[G]) by the seashore (al sefat hayam[H]), uncountable (anarithmētos[G]). 12 Therefore even from one man, and one who was as good as dead, there were birthed descendants who were as the stars of heavens in multitudes, and as the sand by the seashore, uncountable. This verse implies that Avraham (as good as dead being a euphemism for low sperm count, impotence) was delivering sperm that could not seed an egg. But God miraculously strengthened Avraham’s sperm in order for Sarah to conceive. From the union of an impotent man and a barren woman God birthed the father of a nation that still exists to this day (Rom. 4:19). This example is used as evidence that God has, does and will do the impossible, just as the early Jewish believers had seen and heard with regard to the miracles of Yeshua. 13 All these died (apothnēskō[G], meitu[H]) in faith, trust, assurance, belief (pistis[G], ba-emunah[H]), without receiving the promises (epaggelia[G], hahavtachot[H]), but having seen, known, understood (eidō[G]) from a distance, and were persuaded, had confidence, trusted (peithō[G]), and embraced, welcomed, greeted (aspazomai[G]) them, having professed (homologeō[G]) that they were strangers (xenos[G]) and exiles, resident foreigners (parepidēmos[G]) in the land (ho gē[G], ba’aretz[H]). 14 For those who say such things make it clear that they are seeking a native land (patris[G], eretz[H]). 13 All these died in faith, trust, assurance, belief, without receiving the promises, but having seen, known, understood from a distance, and were persuaded, had confidence, trusted, and embraced, welcomed, greeted them, having professed that they were strangers and exiles, resident foreigners in the land. “And Jacob said to Pharaoh, “The days of the years of my dwelling and working as a foreigner are 130 years. Few and evil have been the days of the years of my life, and they have not attained to the days of the years of the life of my fathers in the days of their dwelling and working as a foreigners.” -Genesis 47:9 (Author’s translation) All those mentioned and those yet to be mentioned died being assured in their faith in God that the promises they had not yet seen fulfilled would be fulfilled. This and the fact that it is appointed to all human beings to die once and then the judgement (Heb. 9:27), means that Enoch will one day die, as will Elijah (Rev. 11:7-14). Therefore, they died believing in the resurrection and the world to come (Olam Haba). They understood, that having received God’s promised salvation from sin and everlasting death through the King Messiah Yeshua Who was yet to be born into time and space, that they would live eternally in God through Messiah in a world devoid of sin. Therefore, being in a sin affected world they were by nature of their relationship in God no longer sons and daughters of sin affected creation but had become sons and daughters of the Creator whose new creation is promised to all who believe. They were strangers on this land, this earth because they had turned away from the nature of this place and had been translated through Messiah, thus changing their nature. In Messiah we have already passed from death into life (John 5:24). We are foreigners on this land, this earth. We are inheritors of the world everlasting. 14 For those who say such things make it clear that they are seeking a native land. This is in reference to their belief in the fulfilment of the giving of the promised land of Israel to the Jewish people and in its metaphysical fulfilment in the Olam Haba. Remember, that when Avraham arrived in Canaan God said, "I will give this land to your seed" (Gen. 12:7). Soon after God said, "I will give it to you and your seed forever" (Gen. 13:15). God’s promise to give the ethnic-religious people of Israel the land of Israel is both for the present world and for the world to come. 15 And certainly if they had been remembering (mnēmoneuō[G]) the land (ha’aretz[H]) which they left, they would have had a season, opportunity, an affinity (kairos[G]) for returning (anakamptō[G], lashuv[H]). 16 But now (nuni[G]), they desire a better (tovah[H]) land, that is, a heavenly one (epouranios[G], vishmeiy[H]). Therefore the God (ho Theos[G], ha-Elohiym[H]) is not ashamed to be called their God (Theos[G], Eloheiyhem[H]); for He has prepared a city (polis[G], iyr shamah[H]) for them. 15 And certainly if they had been remembering the land which they left, they would have had a season, opportunity, an affinity for returning. If they had kept thinking on and focusing their attention on where they had come from (out of lands of idolatry, slavery, paganism), they might have returned to that place and failed to receive the promise. In this is a lesson for all believers. We are not to pine away for the past life of sin or focus on those things that we have left behind, rather we are to maintain our commitment to God in Messiah and keep our eyes on Him in Whom we will receive our everlasting inheritance. 16 But now, they desire a better land, that is, a heavenly one. Therefore the God is not ashamed to be called their God; for He has prepared a city for them. In Messiah God the Father (Creator) has adopted children of God from among the children of creation. Land and heavens are seen as convergent concepts here. This indicates a future convergence of heaven and earth, a new heavens and a new earth which are recreated when the sin affected creation is consumed by the purifying fire of God and made new having been ignited by that same fire. The fire of God will purge all evil and purify the redeemed (Rev. 8:8; 9:18; 14:10, 18; 16:8; 17:16; 18:8; 19:20; 20:9-15; 21). The promised land and city that await the faithful in the heavenlies are promised to descend (Rev. 21:2). Throughout, the writer makes “city” and “land” or “country” interchangeable terms in order to convey a holistic Hebraic understanding of convergent things. These things are distinct and one (echad). “He has prepared a city for them” Note “has” before they existed “prepared a city for them”. The New Jerusalem, like the world to come, was prepared in Messiah Yeshua before the foundation of the world. God’s mercy precedes His judgement and is the result of it. 17 In faith, trust, assurance, belief (pistis[G], ba-emunah[H]) Avraham[H] (Father of a great people), when he was examined, proved (peirazō[G]), brought up (prospherō[G]) Yitzchak[H] [Isaac] (he laughs), and the one who had received the promises (epaggelia[G], hahavtachot[H]) was offering up (prospherō[G]) his only son (monogenēs[G]); 18 it was he to whom it was said, “Through Yitzchak[H] (Isaac) your seed (sperma[G], zara[H]) shall be called.” [Gen. 21:12] 17 In faith, trust, assurance, belief Avraham[H], when he was examined, proved, brought up Yitzchak[H] [Isaac], and the one who had received the promises was offering up his only son; 18 it was he to whom it was said, “Through Yitzchak[H] your seed shall be called.” [Gen. 21:12] First, God does not test in order to discover, He is all knowing. Rather He proves, examines, in order that we might discover who we are in Him. Please consider reading my commentary on Genesis 22 concerning Ha-Akeidah (the Binding) to gain a greater understanding of the present text. https://www.bethmelekh.com/yaakovs-commentary---15081497151214931513-1497150615111489/november-11th-2016 The actions of Avraham regarding the offering up of his son Isaac are the ultimate prefigure of God’s offering up of His only begotten Son Yeshua. We note that in both cases the sons are willing participants in the offering, both being adult men at the time of their calling to sacrifice, and both allowing themselves to be bound and offered. Pirqe Rabbi Eliezer draws a connection between the Akeidah and resurrection which is also found in the High Holy Days liturgy of rabbinical Judaism. 19 He considered that the God (ho Theos[G], ha-Elohiym[H]) is able to raise people even from the dead (ho nekros[G], hamavet[H]), from which he also received him back as a type, figure, parable (parabolē[G], lemofeit[H], alt. mashal[H]). 20 In faith, trust, assurance, belief (pistis[G], ba-emunah[H]) Yitzchak[H] [Isaac] (he laughs) blessed Yaakov[H] [Jacob] (follower) and Esav[H] [Esau] (hairy, rough), even regarding things to come. 19 He considered that the God is able to raise people even from the dead, from which he also received him back as a type, figure, parable. Both Avraham and Isaac believed that God could raise the dead. This is clear, based on the fact that both Avraham and Isaac were aware of God’s promise to Avraham’s descendants and His assurance that those descendants would come through Isaac, who had been miraculously conceived. God had shown through physical blessing the reality of His miraculous power to fulfil His promises. Therefore, an adult Isaac (37 years old, Sarah being 90 at his birth and on hearing the news that Avraham was taking Isaac to sacrifice him [re. rabbinic trad.] she died soon after aged 127), willingly allowed Avraham to bind him and offer him because Isaac believed God could raise the dead. And, Avraham bound and offered Isaac, his only true heir, because he believed that God could raise the dead. "when he saw the sword over his neck, his breath fled from him, and came to the place of the soul, ‘as if he was at the point of giving up the ghost’.'' - Pirke Rabbi Eliezer, c. 31. This entire historical account being a prophetic prefigure of what was to come in Yeshua the King Messiah. Therefore, as the text says, “from which he (Avraham) received him (Isaac) back as a parable (teaching story)”. This is a parable that is also an historical event. Avraham received Isaac back because a Ram of God took Isaac’s place, and thus Jacob (Israel) who was at the time still in Isaac’s loins, was also delivered from death by the Ram of God that took his place. In the same way Yeshua took the place of all who would receive Him, He being both the Ram and the Lamb of God slain before the foundation of the world (1 Peter 1:19-20; Rev. 13:8). 20 In faith, trust, assurance, belief Yitzchak[H] blessed Yaakov[H] and Esav[H], even regarding things to come. Ref. Gen 27:1-40 Isaac continued to have faith in God for the promises yet to be fulfilled even in his old age with his vision waning. He blessed his sons though he could not see who he was blessing, and trusted God to bless according to His will rather than according to the will of Isaac’s flesh. As a result Jacob received the blessing and God conferred that blessing onto the 12 sons of Jacob the people of Israel through whom the King Messiah Yeshua was born into time and space in order to redeem human beings from the just punishment of sin, continually first for the Jews and also continually for the nations. Copyright 2021 Yaakov Brown If a hand chooses to leave the body it will no longer be governed by the brain through the nervous system and will fail to receive blood from the heart to maintain its muscles, sinews, and operation. In a short time it will become a rotting piece of dead and decaying flesh. Sadly, this is what becomes of “believers” who refuse to gather regularly with other believers. What’s more the body is now short of a hand. The believer that wilfully refuses to meet regularly with other believers robs both himself and the body of Messiah. Introduction:
The second half of chapter 10 uses the former establishment of eternal atonement and the eternal security of those who receive Yeshua as a foundation for confidence in relationship to God. Yeshua has not only made all believers, regardless of tribe or ethnicity, priests (1 Peter 2:9), He has also given every believer access to the Holiest place (the heavenly holy of holies) in the eternal present, not locationally in the same sense that Yeshua is seated at the right hand of God, but spiritually, in the sense that God dwells in and with us through Yeshua and by His Spirit. To understand this locationally is error, it leads to many heretical teachings, whereas to understand it transcendently (trans-locationally) is righteousness, a faith that accepts the future descent of the heavenly glory and the manifest dwelling of God on the new earth. We do not bring heaven down, God does. We do not affect the second coming, God does. To say otherwise if abhorrent blasphemy, idolatry of the worst kind. Because we are secure in God through Messiah we are to hold on to and proliferate the profession of our faith, and intentionally look for ways that we can inspire and spur one another on to good works. We are not to cease meeting together in the flesh, but are instead admonished to continue to encourage one another in our faith as the day of judgement approaches. We are to turn from willful sin relying on Messiah’s strength in us because there is no further sacrifice, His sacrifice is it. We are admonished to remember our free obligation to be faithful to Yeshua and not become guilty of perpetual lawlessness, given that the rejection of the perfect Messiah and His covenant is far worse than the failure to keep the Torah of Moses. The writer then reminds his fellow Jewish brothers and sisters in Messiah of the former days (prior to 60 C.E.) when they first came to faith in Yeshua and were persecuted alongside others who professed faith in the King Messiah. The early Jewish believers are encouraged to continue to endure with joy (transcendent), just as they did in the beginning, and to disregard earthly possessions and temporary accomplishments, instead keeping their eyes on the eternal possession, their inheritance, that which Yeshua has purchased for them. Their confidence in Messiah comes with a great reward. Finally, the writer quotes Isaiah 26:20 and Hab. 2:3 as both a warning and an encouragement. The latter clause concerning “drawing back” (turning away from God) is redeemed by the words, “But we do not belong to those who shrink back to destruction, but are of those who have faith and are saved.” Previous verses (Heb. 10:16-18): 16 “This is the covenant which I will make with them After those days, declares the Lord: I will put My laws upon their hearts, And write them on their mind,” He then says, 17 “And their sins and their lawless deeds I will no longer remember.” 18 Now where there is forgiveness of these things, an offering for sin is no longer required. BOOK TO THE HEBREWS Chapter 10:19-39 (Author’s translation) 19 Therefore, fellow Jewish brothers and sisters, since we have free, plain, confidence, boldness, security to enter into the holiest place by the blood of the Messiah Yeshua 20 by a new, recently slaughtered, freshly killed and living way which He inaugurated, renewed, consecrated, dedicated for us through the veil, that is, through His flesh, body, 21 also a great high priest over, on, in, among the house of God, 22 let’s approach with/in a true, whole, well-constructed heart, inner person, centre of being in full assurance of faith, trust, belief that is innocent having our hearts, inner persons, centre of our being sprinkled, washed, purified from a wicked, delusional, spiritually evil conscience, consciousness, moral perception and our bodies washed with pure water. 23 Let’s hold firmly, keep, possess the profession [projected testimony], in the knowledge of our faith, hope without wavering, for He who promised is faithful; 24 and let’s consider how to provoke, incite, irritate, rouse one another, brothers and sisters in all-encompassing love and good deeds, 25 not abandoning, forsaking assembling ourselves together as is the habit, manner, way, moral practice, modus operandi, custom, perpetual intention of some people, but comforting, encouraging, exhorting, desiring one another; and all the more as you see the day drawing near. 26 For if we continue to sin, wilfully, in malice after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there remains no further blood sacrifice upon sins, 27 but a terrifying expectation, a constant phobia of judgment and “the fiery zealous indignation which will consume the adversaries/oppressors” [Num. 16:35 LXX “kai puros zelos”]. 28 Anyone who has despised, rejected, violated the Torah[H] of Moshe[H] died without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses. 29 How much more severe a punishment do you think that one will deserve who has trampled underfoot the Son of God, and has regarded, makes as unclean, unholy, common the blood of the covenant by which that one was sanctified, and has insulted the Spirit of grace, kindness, charity, practical love? 30 For we see, perceive, understand, know Him who said, “Vengeance is Mine, I will repay.” [Deut. 32:35] And again, “The Lord (YHVH) will judge His people.” [Deut. 32:36; Psalms 135:14] 31 It is a terrifying, fearful thing [a constant phobia] to fall into the hands of the living God. 32 But remember the former, first days, when, after being enlightened, you endured, your eyes have seen a great fight, struggle, contest of sufferings, tortures, 33 partly by your being made a public spectacle through insults and distress, and partly by becoming companions, fellow participants with those who were so treated. 34 For you showed sympathy to me in my bonds [alt. to the prisoners] and accepted joyfully the seizure, spoiling, extorting of your possessions, knowing, having learned in your souls that you have for yourselves [alt. have in heaven] a better and lasting substance. 35 Therefore, do not throw away your free, plain, bold, confidence, which has a great reward. 36 For you have need of patient endurance, so that when you have done the will, desire of God, you may receive what was promised. 37 “For yet in a very little while, He who is coming will come, and will not delay. [Isaiah 26:20; Hab. 2:3 LXX] [Hebrew text Habakkuk 2:3: “For yet a vision to an appointed time and it shall speak, blow, to the end/goal and it will not lie though it waits, wait for it, coming it has come, it will not hesitate.”] 38 But My righteous one will live by faith; [Hab. 2:4] And if he shrinks back, My soul has no pleasure in him.” [LXX and a summation of Hab. 2:5-20] [Hebrew text of Habakkuk 2:4: “Behold, now, pay attention, he is lifted up (has drawn back through pride) and is not upright in his soul, behold, and the just/righteous, by his faith shall he live.”] 39 But we are not among those who draw back [through pride per Heb. Hab. 2:4] to destruction, damnation, but of those who have faith, trust, belief for obtaining the salvation, preservation of our souls. HEBREWS 10:19-39 (line upon line) 19 Therefore, fellow Jewish brothers and sisters (adelphos[G], echay/achiym[H]), since we have free, plain, confidence, boldness, security (parrhesia[G], bihyot[H]) to enter into the holiest place (ho hagion[G], haKodesh[H]) by the blood (aima[G], bedam[H]) of the Messiah Yeshua[H] (Ho Christos[G], Ha-Mashiach[H], Iesous[G], YHVH [Mercy] Saves) 20 by a new, recently slaughtered, freshly killed (prosphatos[G], chadash[H]) and living (zao[G], chay[H]) way (hodos[G], derekh[H]) which He inaugurated, renewed, consecrated, dedicated (egkainizo[G], chideish[H]) for us through the veil (ho katapetasma[G], baparochet[H]), that is, through His (hautou[G]) flesh, body (sarx[G], vesaro[H]), 19 Therefore, fellow Jewish brothers and sisters, since we have free, plain, confidence, boldness, security to enter into the holiest place by the blood of the Messiah Yeshua[H] “Therefore, fellow Jewish brothers and sisters,” With few exceptions, when a Jewish New Covenant writer uses the Greek “adelphos” (brother, or the pl. brothers, by implication brothers and sisters), equivalent to the Hebrew “echay” or “achiym”, the writer intends it to be understood to refer to his ethnic Jewish brothers and sisters. While the teaching (spiritual principles) pursuant to the familial noun can be received and applied by all believers, this is nonetheless a secondary application. “since we have free, confidence, security to enter into the holiest place by the blood of the Messiah Yeshua” Our confidence, security, freedom as believers is in Messiah through His eternal blood atonement. Therefore, we have been given continuing access to enter into the holiest place of intimacy with God. The holy of holies of the earthly hamishkan (Tent of meeting) and hamikdash (temple) are a sign that point to the holiest place in the heavens where Messiah is now seated in the right hand of the Father, while we remain on earth. However, Messiah in us as the Holy Spirit of the Father and the Son, has brought the yet future manifestation of the holiest place (re. residing in the new Jerusalem that descends Rev. 21:22-23) to us according to His transcendent nature as resurrected King. He is both locationally seated in the right hand of God and trans-locationally present in us. The resurrected Messiah is not bound by matter, time, space or location. We do not ascend to the heavens in order to access the holiest place, to the contrary, the message of Scripture is that God’s manifest presence and person descend to dwell with and in us. Those who seek to ascend have failed to understand the access that believers have been given in Messiah to a holiest place that is unbound by the locational limitations set by the human mind as it perceives this sin affected temporal world. Neither matter, nor time, nor space, nor any other created thing can impede the access of the believer to the holiest place through the blood of Messiah. This is why Yeshua said, “But the hour comes and now is, when the true worshipers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth; for the Father seeks such to worship Him.” -Yochanan (John) 4:23 Therefore, locational worship, while significant as a sign pointing to the holiest place of intimacy with God, is nonetheless preceded and succeeded, or proceeded from, in the trans-locational worship found in God through Messiah Yeshua. Put simply, we don’t need to ascend to the “holiest place” because our great High Priest Yeshua Who resides there also resides in us by the Holy Spirit (Spirit of the Father and the Son). It is foolish then, to claim (as some do) that we can ascend into the heavenly holy of holies through certain practices, prayers, invocations and processes. This is the modus operandi of witchcraft. To the contrary, in Messiah the trans-locational manifest presence of God is eternally present with us. We await the fullness of that manifestation at the return of the King Messiah and following the judgement (haDin-the Day of Judgement), when the new Jerusalem will descend from the heavens and God will dwell with humanity, the city being devoid of a temple because God Himself and the Lamb Yeshua will be its temple and its perpetual light (Rev. 21:22-23). Those who practice locational faith (a companion to emotional faith) will find to their detriment that there are locations that offer no inspiration. Whereas those who practice transcendent faith in Messiah Yeshua will find that their faith is trans-locational. ***FOR ADDITIONAL STUDY*** or skip to next verse… For further study the following commentary on Hebrews 9:27 refutes the false teaching that believers can travel trans-dimensionally into the heavens (an occult teaching akin to astral travel) that misunderstands the words of Rav Shaul (Paul) recorded in 2 Corinthians 12:1-5: “And just as it is appointed for people to die once, and after this, the judgment,” -Hebrews 9:27 This verse puts death to the false claims of those who say they have died and literally been to heaven and have come back to shared their experiences. While according to Scripture (2 Cor. 12:2-4) one can claim to have experienced a vision of paradise (Gan Eden, Bosom of Abraham ref. Luke 16:19-31) as convergent with the third heaven (not heaven but a part of Sheol), one cannot legitimately claim to have actually, physically or metaphysically entered the heaven of heavens (John 3:13; Heb. 9:27; Luke 23:43)[note that Elijah was taken into “hashamayim” the heavens pl. and not into the heaven of heavens in particular (2 Kings 2). Also in the case of Enoch who “was not”, heaven is not mentioned (Gen 5:24). The Scripture does not say “it is appointed to human beings to die and spend time in heaven and then come back for a while and die again etc…” But, “It is appointed to human beings to die once and then the judgement”, not “and then some other things and then the judgement”, but “and then the judgement” which by necessity precedes what Christians mistakenly call “heaven”, but is actually the Olam haba (world to come). Only following the judgement do we dwell forever in the Olam Haba (World to come), prior to that the redeemed await the judgement in Paradise (Bosom of Abraham, Gan Eden). Those Scriptures used to support the counterfeit experiences of those who have “passed” and been revived, when examined closely, affirm the present text rather than being divergent in their meaning. This verse also puts to death the false idea of the ghosts of human souls, which in reality are demonic spirits (false elohim [gods]) masquerading as departed human souls. This is extremely important in light of the many foolish misinterpretations of Hebrews 12:1 and 1 Samuel 28:3-21. According to this verse there are two steps between the present temporal life and the Olam Haba (world to come) [mis referred to by Christians as “heaven”]: 1. The death of the human being as a result of the sin affected world 2. Judgement. There are no intermediary stages mentioned, nor does the wealth of Scripture support such stages. Those who teach otherwise teach apostasy. An explanation of the verses commonly used in an attempt to circumvent the truth of Hebrews 9:27. My commentary on 1 Samuel 28:3-21 https://www.bethmelekh.com/yaakovs-commentary---15081497151214931513-1497150615111489/1-samuel-283-21-saul-and-the-witch-of-eyn-dor Hebrews 12:1 The allusion to the cloud of witnesses in Hebrews 12 is referring back to the list of those witnesses to God’s faithfulness who are listed in Hebrews 11, commonly known as the Faith Chapter. These witnesses, as can be seen from Hebrews 11, are the now deceased patriarchs and heroes of the Jewish faith. The writer of Hebrews, a Jew and a Kohen (Priest), knows that the witnesses he is referring to are deceased and that many of them are buried throughout the land of Israel, and that they are therefore uncontactable according to the teaching of Scripture regarding the dead (Hebrews 9:27). In the parable of Lazarus and the Rich Man (Luke 16) Yeshua explains that while the dead are conscious, they are not able either to traverse the chasm between Gehinnom (torment) and Gan Eden (Paradise) nor (re: Lazarus etc. once they are finally deceased [Hebrews 9:27]) are they able to traverse the distance between Sheol and the present world. In my article on Saul, Samuel and the Witch of Eyndor, I explain why the events of 1 Samuel 28:3-21 are not describing the dead spirit of Samuel called up but rather an evil spirit that fools both the witch and Saul, and is subsequently used by God to condemn Saul (ref. see link above). The writer of the book of Hebrews is using the deceased Jewish witnesses of Hebrews 11 as a figurative example. When he says: “Therefore, since we have such a great cloud of witnesses lying around us, let us also get rid of every weight and entangling sin. Let us run with endurance the race set before us, focusing on Yeshua, the author and perfecter of faith.” –Hebrews 12:1-2a He is making a drash (inquiry/comparative teaching) regarding how we should act in light of the figurative (not literal) cloud of witnesses that are buried throughout the land of Israel. We must remember that the writer is probably writing from the perspective of a priest living in the Land of Israel prior to the destruction of the Temple in 70 C.E (A.D). He then qualifies this teaching by instructing us, not to focus on the cloud of witnesses, but on Yeshua, the author and perfecter of our faith (The faith that our Jewish forebears shared in the coming Messiah Yeshua). We cannot engage with this cloud of witnesses because they are deceased and according to Scripture (Hebrews 9:27) they are uncontactable. Those who do seek to speak to the dead are in fact speaking with demonic forces rather than the spirits of dead people (1 Timothy 4:1; 1 Corinthians 10:20-21; 2 Corinthians 11:14-15). “Let no one be found among you who sacrifices his son or daughter in the fire, who practices divination or sorcery, interprets omens, engages in witchcraft, or casts spells, or who is a medium or spiritist or who consults the dead.” –Deuteronomy 18:10-12 Therefore, not only are we unable to engage with the dead witnesses of Hebrews 11-12, we are also commanded by God not to attempt to speak with the dead. 1 Peter 3:14-21 “If you suffer for righteousness' sake, be glad: and don’t be afraid of their terror, neither be troubled; But sanctify (Kiddush) HaShem (Merciful) Elohiym (Judge) in your core being (heart): and be ready always to give an answer to every human being that asks you the reason for the hope that is in you with humility and reverent awe: Having a good conscience; that, whereas they speak evil of you, as of evildoers, they may be ashamed who falsely accuse your good conduct in Messiah. For it’s better if God’s will is that you suffer for doing well than for doing evil. For Messiah also at one time suffered for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, that He might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh but made alive in the Ruach (Spirit). By Whom (The Spirit) He also went and made proclamation to the ruachiym (spirits) in prison (phulake: foo-lak-ay). Who were formerly disobedient, when at one time the longsuffering God waited in the days of Noach (Comfort), while the ark was being prepared, in which a few, that is eight souls (nefesh) were saved by water (mikveh: gathering of water). This figurative likeness being a representation of the immersion (baptism) that now also saves us (not the washing of the flesh but the earnest seeking of a good conscience toward God) by the resurrection of Yeshua (Jesus) Messiah.” –1 Peter 3:17-21 In the context of Peter’s letter, the community of believers is being encouraged to share their faith with anyone who asks, and not to shy away from suffering if that is what God’s will entails. Peter then offers Yeshua as an example of One Who suffered and shared His message in the Spirit of God. It is explained that Yeshua’s suffering puts to death the sinful practices of the flesh and resurrects each believer in the life giving Spirit of God. It is by this same Spirit that the resurrected Messiah (not in Sheol) transcends time and space, and thus traverses time and space by the Spirit, to proclaim His saving work to those spirits of human beings who were still living in the flesh at the time of Noah prior to the flood. The text explains that during the time of Noah only eight imprisoned spirits heard Yeshua’s message received it and were delivered through the figurative tevilah immersion (baptism) of the flood, which the author shows to be a prefigure of the same tevilah immersion (baptism) that believers in Messiah have received unto salvation. From the p’shat (plain) meaning of the text and the subsequent, remez (hint), drash (comparative) and sod (mystery), we see that it does not place Yeshua in Sheol in relation to His proclamation but shows that it is by the Spirit of God following His resurrection that He spoke to the imprisoned spirits of humanity past. This text is not teaching anything even remotely to do with communicating with imprisoned dead people or angelic spirits. To the contrary, it simply teaches that God is just and that all humanity from Adam to the end of days has and will have an opportunity to either reject or receive the message of Messiah. This text shows how in the Spirit (of God), the resurrected Messiah transcends time and space and manifests the supernatural reality that He was both literally and figuratively slain before the foundation of the world (Revelation 13:8). 2 Corinthians 12:1-5 Boasting is necessary, though it is not beneficial; but I will go on to visions and revelations [a]of the Lord. 2 I know a man in Christ, who fourteen years ago—whether in the body I do not know, or out of the body I do not know, God knows—such a man was caught up to the third heaven. 3 And I know how such a man—whether in the body or apart from the body I do not know, God knows— 4 was caught up into Paradise and heard inexpressible words, which a man is not permitted to speak. -2 Corinthians 12:1-4 NASB V.1 Boasting is necessary, though it is not beneficial; but I will go on to visions and revelations [a]of the Lord. What Rav Shaul (Paul) is about to speak of is a “vision”, a “revelation” and not a physical or metaphysical event. Therefore, based on the very nature of either a vision or a revelation, the events described are already presumed unreal, not actual, neither physical nor metaphysical, but instead, something seen in the imagination, mind’s eye or spirit. V2. I know a man in Christ, who fourteen years ago—whether in the body I do not know, or out of the body I do not know, God knows—such a man was caught up to the third heaven. Rav Shaul is possibly speaking of himself in the guise of apologetic self-promoting rhetoric like that employed elsewhere in his works. Alternatively he is relaying the vision experience of a trusted fellow believer, perhaps one of his brothers among the Jewish Church fathers. He states clearly “whether in the body I don’t know, or out of the body I don’t know, God knows…” He is describing the experience of a vision. Those who experience visions have all kinds of feelings and sensory adventures but are not literally in the places they are visioning. Rav Shaul is not espousing “out of body experience”, which is an occult practice connected with Gnosticism, transcendental meditation and other false religious beliefs. To the contrary, Biblical Judaism abhors this idea viewing it as a form of witchcraft. Instead, Rav Shaul is alluding to the difference between experiencing a vision as if it were inside us verses experiencing a vision as if we are looking outwardly at it (both occurring within the mind’s eye or consciousness but neither occurring outside the body). In neither case does the spirit leave the body. Biblical Judaism teaches that the human soul (Body, mind, spirit etc.) is a unity unseparated until death when the spirit leaves and goes to Sheol. The Greek harpaso is poorly translated here by the NASB. In the context of this vision it means “caught away” and not caught up. Rav Shaul is right to give the interpretation to God, saying “God Knows”. Yes, God does know, in fact, so as to avoid confusion God has authored His word to say, “No one has ascended into heaven, except He who descended from heaven: the Son of Man.” (John 3:13), and “it is appointed for people to die once, and after this, the judgment…” (Heb. 9:27). V.3 And I know how such a man—whether in the body or apart from the body I do not know, God knows..” He repeats, “whether in the body I don’t know, or out of the body I don’t know, God knows…” because he is bewildered by the vision experience he is referring to and rightly understands that it was not a tangible, literal experience. Neither a physical or metaphysical reality. In Biblical Hebrew thought and interpretation something repeated is firmly established. Therefore, Rav Shaul has firmly established that he doesn’t know where the “man” was. As explained, the Scripture tells us where he was not. V.4 was caught up into Paradise and heard inexpressible words, which a man is not permitted to speak. The Greek harpaso is again poorly translated here by the NASB. In the context of this vision it means “caught away” and not caught up. We know this because the Jewish writer refers to paradise (Gan Eden, the Bosom of Abraham), which is a part of Sheol, meaning that the qualification of heaven, written as “third heaven” refers to the convergent presence of the Messiah in both the heavens and paradise simultaneously, following His resurrection. Following His resurrection the King Messiah being unbound by time, space, situational and locational being etc. In short, regardless of the issue of traversing the heavens as believers, this text is referring to a convergent form of paradise (in Sheol) and not to the heaven of heavens. Therefore, the text of 2 Corinthians 12:1-4 does not teach that a person (perhaps Paul) ascended to the heaven of heavens, something that would contradict the words of Yeshua and the teaching of Hebrews 9:27. Regarding the Resurrections of Lazarus, the Son of the widow of Nain etc. All (those temporally resurrected) had not yet passed into Sheol but were in transition sleep. Meaning unconscious but the spirit had not left the body according to ancient Jewish tradition (3 to 4 day period of unconscious sleep, the first stage of death/passing). This means that the person cannot communicate with the living, nor are they yet in Sheol (When Yeshua says "Today you will be with me in paradise" to the thief on the cross (Luke 23:43) I believe the word "today" is used in an eternally present sense. Alternatively, some pass over more quickly than others, although with regard to time and space how could we even begin to determine the measure by which we could access such a process?) In all these cases of temporal resurrections (they are exceptions, and include Elijah raising the woman's son) the resurrected are resurrected within four days of death, and their spirits have not entered death finally with regard to entering Sheol. "Appointed unto man once to die" regards the spirit's entry into Sheol and not the transition period of soul sleep (a euphemism used by Yeshua [John 11:11]). No one in transition sleep (first stage of separation) can communicate to the living. Therefore, the point I made regarding ghosts being demons remains the same, ghosts are not wandering human spirits. HEBREWS 10 COMMENTARY CONTINUES HERE: 20 by a new, recently slaughtered, freshly killed and living way which He inaugurated, renewed, consecrated, dedicated for us through the veil, that is, through His flesh, body, “recently slaughtered” For the first century Jewish recipients of this scroll the death and resurrection of Yeshua had occurred less than 30 years prior to the writing of this work. Yeshua’s recent sacrifice is being called to mind in order to inspire those who have already become weary in the faith. The writer reminds his believing Jewish brothers and sisters that they have been witness to the sacrificial death of Yeshua that has inaugurated a new way of living strengthened by the Spirit of God, purchased by the body of Messiah. “through the veil, that is, through His flesh, body” The torn body of Messiah Yeshua is here compared to the torn parochet veil which guarded access to the holy of holies of the temple (tent of meeting). Just as the physical veil was torn allowing the priests to see past it into the holy of holies and by extension giving them access to that place, so the body of Messiah was torn in order to give access to the holiest place of intimacy with God to the priesthood of believers over whom He is the Great High Priest. 21 also (kai[G]) a great high (megas[G]) priest (hiereus[G], Kohen Gadol[H]) over, on, in, among (epi[G], al[H]) the house (ho oikos[G], habeiyt[H]) of God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]), 22 let’s approach (proserchomai[G]) with/in a true, whole, well-constructed (alethinos[G], shaleim[H]) heart, inner person, centre of being (kardia[G], beleivav[H]) in full assurance (plerophoris[G]) of faith, trust, belief that is innocent (pistis[G], uve’emunah temiymah[H]) having our hearts, inner persons, centre of our being (kardia[G], levaveinu[H]) sprinkled, washed, purified (rhantizo[G], urechutzeiy[H]) from a wicked, delusional, spiritually evil (poneros[G], metohariym behazayat levaveinu meiruach ra’ah[H]) conscience, consciousness, moral perception (suneidesis[G]) and our bodies (soma[G], habasar[H]) washed (louo[G]) with pure (katharos[G]) water (hudor[G], bemayim tehoriym[H]). 21 also a great high priest over, on, in, among the house of God, 22 let’s approach with/in a true, whole, well-constructed heart, inner person, centre of being in full assurance of faith, trust, belief that is innocent having our hearts, inner persons, centre of our being sprinkled, washed, purified from a wicked, delusional, spiritually evil conscience, consciousness, moral perception and our bodies washed with pure water. “among the house of God” Both ha-beiyt (the house) and har-beiyt (mountain house) are euphemistic Hebrew names for the Temple in Jerusalem. The idea is being used here to point to the house of God that is built of living stones (1 Peter 2:5). “let’s approach with/in a true, whole, well-constructed heart, inner person” As the phrasing explains, we approach in a true, transformed, well-constructed centre of being. This is a spiritual approach which is symbolised by the physical signs of the temple and its processes. We are not physically ascending into the holiest place in the heavens. “in full assurance of faith” We need not concern ourselves with personal doubts and failures because it is the faith imparted by God that indwells us. In a very real sense we have faith because He first gave us faith. Therefore, having received Him, our faith is reliant on Him and is not subject to our doubts, without which faith cannot exist. “purified from a wicked, delusional, spiritually evil conscience” Note that the conscience of a fallen human being is by nature “poneros” (wicked), in and of itself unable to discern properly between right and wrong because its inclination is to call right that which is wrong. “our bodies washed with pure water.” With regard to ritual washing, tevilah bamikveh (immersion in the waters): mayim chayim (living waters) from a fresh living source are used (underground spring, mountain water, pool etc.). However, with regard to the purification through which the believer enters the holiest place in Yeshua, the living waters of the sin affected creation cannot cleanse the inner person. This is why the writer uses the Greek “katharos hudor” (pure water) and why the Hebrew translation reads “bemayim tehoriym” (waters that purify). The water spoken of here is not the physical waters of immersion but the transcendent water of the Holy Spirit, the same prophetic outpouring of water Israel eagerly anticipated each Sukkot in the kinetic prayer of the water libation right (Isaiah 12:3-5). Note: In approximately 32 C.E. (A.D.) Israel celebrated Sukkot the feast of Shelters. For seven days they watched the High Priest pour out water upon the altar inside the Temple grounds. They prayed for rain and that God will send the promised Messiah to deliver them from Roman oppression. On the final day of the feast called Hoshanah Rabbah – ‘The Great Salvation’, a Rabbi stands up among them and yells out at the top of His voice… “If anyone thirsts, let him come to me and drink. Whoever believes in me, as the Scripture has said, ‘Out of his heart will flow rivers of living water.’” –Yochanan (John) 7:37 The water that had just been poured on the altar had been taken from the pool of Shiloach (Sent), where Yeshua had healed a blind man only days before. (John 5) The priests of Israel were required to wash themselves completely before entering the temple (Exodus 30:19-21; Leviticus 8:6; Mishnah Yoma c. 3. sect. 3.). This too was a sign pointing to the need for those who become priests in Messiah to be purified with a better purification, one that is of everlasting effect. “Then will I sprinkle pure water upon you, and you shall be clean: from all your filthiness, and from all your idols, I will cleanse you.” -Ezekiel 36:25 23 Let’s hold firmly, keep, possess (katecho[G], nachaziykah[H]) the profession [projected testimony], in the knowledge (homologia[G], behoda’at[H]) of our faith, hope (elpis[G], Hatikvah[H]) without wavering (aklines[G]), for He who promised (epaggello[G]) is faithful (pistos[G], ne’eman hamavtiyach[H]); 24 and let’s consider (katanoeo[G]) how to provoke, incite, irritate, rouse (paroxsusmos[G], leoreir[H]) one another, brothers and sisters (allelon[G], iysh al-achiyn[H]) in all-encompassing love (agape[G], ahavah[H]) and good deeds (kalos ergon[G], ulma’asiym toviym[H]), 25 not abandoning, forsaking (egkataleipo[G], al-na’azov[H]) assembling ourselves together (episunagoge heautou[G], et-keneisyateinu[H]) as is the habit, manner, way, moral practice, modus operandi, custom, perpetual intention (ethos[G], kederekh[H]) of some people, but comforting, encouraging, exhorting, desiring (parakaleo[G]) one another; and all the more as you see (blepo[G], birotechem[H]) the day (ho hemera[G], hayom[H]) drawing near (eggizo[G]). 23 Let’s hold firmly, keep, possess the profession [projected testimony], in the knowledge of our faith, hope, without wavering, for He who promised is faithful; Both the first century Jewish believers and all subsequent believers are admonished to hold firmly to profession (continued pronouncement) of the Good News of Yeshua based on the faith we have due to His immutable faithfulness. In practical terms believers are being warned not to allow their grip on the foundational doctrines of faith to be loosened through weariness, disillusionment, or by the secular and false religious worldviews that surround all human beings. We are to guard the projected testimony of the Gospel of Yeshua in us, individually and corporately. As we have previously discussed the first century Jewish believers living in approximately 60 C.E. were under tremendous pressure from their families and the wider body of ethnic-religious Jews, many of whom had come to despise the Jewish sect HaDerekh (the Way). Therefore, the writer of Hebrews is tasked with prodding them and waking them from the slumber of disillusionment, reminding them that the One Who called them is faithful. 24 and let’s consider how to provoke, incite, irritate, rouse one another, brothers and sisters in all-encompassing love and good deeds, Notice the depth of meaning in the text of the original languages. Our provocation of one another toward good deeds is to be multifaceted. Notice that the word “encourage” is not employed yet, certainly not in the modern sense of the word. Rather at times inspiring good deeds in fellow believers will require us to incite, provoke, even irritate other believers in all-encompassing love, both through our good deeds and in order to prompt good deeds in them. This is not the trite “encouragement” of the secular world or of modern emotionalism born of a pervasive victim mentality, rather it is the raw provocation of a loving God. We are to provoke others through and unto good deeds in the same way the prophets of old did. If you choose to walk in this, as Messiah did, expect to upset people. This is not an instruction for the faint hearted. Thank God He is the strength of our hearts. 25 not abandoning, forsaking assembling ourselves together as is the habit, manner, way, moral practice, modus operandi, custom, perpetual intention of some people, but comforting, encouraging, exhorting, desiring one another; and all the more as you see the day drawing near. The Greek text literally reads “not neglecting to synagogue (assemble in a specified place) ourselves together.” The great rabbi Hillel says: “Do not separate yourself from the community.” -Avot 2:4 “assembling ourselves together” While it is true that meeting online via various media platforms and interactive computer software is in some way beneficial, it is not what is meant here. Not in context, not in principle. “assembling ourselves together” means in physical proximity, engaged in all aspects of godly relationship. Online meetings alone are not a sufficient example of obedience to this instruction. We may submit to governing bodies in this regard for a time, however, if the meeting together of believers were to become illegal as a general and ongoing point of secular law, the writer of the Scroll to the Hebrews, inspired by the Holy Spirit, affords us the mandate to refuse that law. Any secular law that contradicts the Law of God is by nature a law of rebellion and should be refused. Re. covid-19 protocols. While the separation of infectious members of the community is mandated by Scripture (Torah) for a period of time, in order to protect the wider community, there is no Scriptural mandate for “locking down” or imprisoning the entire community in their separate households or otherwise, for any length of time. In short, Scripture teaches a reasoned approach to combating infectious illness that does not shut down the necessary interactions of societal life. The current overreach of world governments in an attempt to control the covid-9 outbreak is in direct opposition to the instruction of Hebrews 10:25. A godly response to a health crisis like the one we are currently faced with is to act discerningly, holistically, intentionally but not through fear mongering and the suppression of Biblically moral human rights. We are admonished to meet together in person. And so at some point in the near future we will. “The day” refers to Yom HaDin (the day of judgement) [Isaiah 2:12; Joel 1:15, 3:14; Zechariah 14:1; Thessalonians 5:4; 2 Peter 3:12; Rev 16:14]. “not abandoning, forsaking assembling ourselves together as is the habit, manner, way, moral practice, modus operandi, custom, perpetual intention of some people,” It has become fashionable among many believers today to criticise those leaders and members of our communities who speak rebuke to those who are failing to meet the godly standards set for the believing community. If a community leader dares to decry the actions of those who are disobeying God’s Word, that leader immediately receives criticism from self-righteous Christians, who, having been convicted by the word spoken, choose to respond by challenging the “negative” attitude of the speaker. And yet, here in this verse we have a father of the faith rebuking those who have ceased meeting with other believers, and who have made it their habit not to meet with other believers. Jewish tradition states that among those that go down to Gehenna and perish, and have no part in the world to come, are those "who separate from the ways of the congregation (community of faith)" -Talmud Bavliy Rosh Hashanah, 17. 1. Why? Because outside of the faith community, individuals lose sight of sound doctrine, being without fellow believers to correct their errors (something every human being needs), they descend into disbelief. The Proverb “Bad company corrupts good character” applies both corporately and individually. If I am outside of the community of faith I have already disobeyed the command of God to remain in the community. I myself have therefore become the bad company that corrupts my character. I am weary of hearing believers say “I’m a Messiah follower but I don’t like the Church”, and “I’m a Christian but modern Churches are all off the rails, so I don’t go”. There are two errors in this thinking: first, ecclesia (body of believers, Church) is the gathering “assembling together” of believers, therefore, a person cannot go to Church, so saying “I don’t” or “I won’t go to Church” is redundant, we are Church; second, in order to remain a healthy member of the body of Messiah one must gather, assemble together with other believers. If a hand chooses to leave the body it will no longer be governed by the brain through the nervous system and will fail to receive blood from the heart to maintain its muscles, sinews, and operation. In a short time it will become a rotting piece of dead and decaying flesh. Sadly, this is what becomes of “believers” who refuse to gather regularly with other believers. What’s more the body is now short of a hand. The believer that wilfully refuses to meet regularly with other believers robs both himself and the body of Messiah. Additionally, the context of Hebrews 10:25 denotes a local, even specific kehilah (community). It is an admonishment to remain committed in an ongoing way to a specific community and is therefore also a rebuke against those who go from community to community to serve their own spiritual needs rather than committing to and serving a specific community. In this context failing to meet together with other believers on a regular basis is synonymous with failing to commit to a specific kehilah (congregation). “Living stones” (1 Peter 2:5) are not put in place so as to remove themselves whenever they feel like it and seek out another building. This is an act of sabotage. The removal of even one stone can weaken and eventually topple a building. Refusing to meet with other believers not only robs the community, it also robs those unbelievers outside the community of faith of the opportunity to witness the Gospel through the love we have for one another: “A new commandment I give to you all collectively and individually, that you love one another; as I have loved you, that you all collectively and individually also love one another. By this all people will know, come to understand that you all collectively and individually are my disciples, if you have love one to another.” -Yeshua recorded in Yochanan (John) 13:34-35 Scripture for further study: 1 John 3:10-11, 14, 18; 4:7-8 Some may have genuinely experienced harm in the community of faith and have deep hurts, but the answer is not to shun the family of Messiah. If and uncle molests a child unbeknownst to the family, does that make the entire wider family guilty? Of course not. But healing and restoration is needed, something that cannot take place outside the family. The answer is in the following clause. “but comforting, encouraging, exhorting, desiring one another; and all the more as you see the day drawing near.” We are to comfort one another. In hurts, in conflict, in loss, in repentance, in holiness, love justice, reconciliation. And this we must do more and more, because with every breath the day of judgement draws nearer. We are admonished with love and awe to remember God’s holiness and work out our faith in fear and trembling. If we do so we will see the death of the false teachings of hyper-grace and hyper-law, and will be participants in a community of faith that goes from strength to strength in Messiah Yeshua. 26 For if we continue to sin, [sin perpetually] (hamartano[G], im-necheta[H]) wilfully, in malice (hekousios[G], vezadon[H]) after receiving (lambano[G]) the knowledge (ho epignosis[G], yediyat[H]) of the truth (ho aletheia[G], haemet[H]), there remains no further (ouketi[G], lo-yisaeir od[H]) blood sacrifice (thusia[G], zevach[H]) upon sins (hamartano[G], al-hachataiym[H]), 27 but a terrifying expectation, a constant phobia (tis phoberos echdoche[G]) of judgment (krisis[G], hadiyn[H]) and “the fiery (puros[G], eish[H]) zealous indignation (zelos[G], kinah[H]) which will consume (esthio[G], tochul[H])” the adversaries/oppressors (hupenantios[G], et hatzorariym[H]) [Num. 16:35 LXX “kai puros zelos”]. 26 For if we continue to sin, wilfully, in malice after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there remains no further blood sacrifice upon sins, “For if we continue to sin wilfully* after receiving the knowledge of the truth” This refers to a lifestyle of intentional sin lived according to the evil inclination or fallen nature. It does not refer to individual sins that believers commit from time to time as they continue to undergo sanctification in this world. It should be understood as “For if we continue to intentionally live a lifestyle of sin…” *The Torah distinguishes between wilful and unwitting sins (Leviticus 4:1-5:13; Numbers 15:22-31 “there remains no further blood sacrifice upon sins” In short, the sacrifice of Yeshua is the only means of redemption from sin and salvation from eternal punishment. There is “no further sacrifice” other than the sacrifice of Messiah. The text does not say “there is no sacrifice” but, “there is no further sacrifice”. This text is not saying that those who receive Messiah and then turn their back on Him cannot be saved, rather it is saying that Messiah’s sacrifice is their only means of salvation. Nor does it teach that those who genuinely receive Yeshua can lose their salvation. Fools and heretics teach this verse as proof that a believer can lose salvation, and that a believer who continues to sin is doomed to damnation. We should ask, “Is there any believer who does not sin?” The answer is of course “No!” But we are being sanctified. If it is true that a person can lose salvation then Messiah’s ability to save is weak and our receipt of it relies on our efforts to perpetuate it and not His. This is blasphemous idolatry, it is anti-Christ, anti-Biblical, anti-Gospel, anti-metanarrative of Scripture. Without fail and consistently Scripture teaches that there is always an opportunity for salvation up until death and judgement. What’s more, Yeshua teaches that those who genuinely receive Him have already passed from death into life everlasting (John 5:24; 1 John 3:14), and that our salvation is entirely reliant on Yeshua, our role in it being to receive Him, and His work in us being to sanctify us unto the judgement and the world to come. “For through one sacrifice He (Yeshua) has made perfect forever (not temporally) those who are being sanctified (made holy within time and space)…” -Hebrews 10:14 Author’s translation and explanation “Therefore there is now no condemnation to them who are in Messiah Yeshua, who walk not after the flesh (sinful nature), but after the Spirit (of God). For the Torah of the Spirit of life in Messiah Yeshua has constructed me free from the Torah of sin and death (indictment).” -Romans 8:1-2 Author’s translation and explanation 27 but a terrifying expectation, a constant phobia of judgment and “the fiery zealous indignation which will consume the adversaries/oppressors” [Num. 16:35 LXX “kai puros zelos”]. “The fiery zealous indignation” (kai puros zelos) The writer is quoting the Septuagint version of Numbers 16:35. The adversaries in the account of Numbers 16 are Korah and his rebellious retinue, who had questioned both Moses and the Lord regarding the appointment of Moses and Aaron as spiritual leaders of Israel. The writer of Hebrews is warning the Jewish recipients of his work that rebellion against Yeshua, God’s ultimate anointed One (appointed leader over all Israel and the nations) will be met with a fiery wrath like (but not the same as) the punishment that consumed those who rebelled against God’s appointed leaders following the escape from Egypt. The escape from Egypt symbolic of escape from bondage to sin and therefore a poignant reminder concerning the redemptive work of Yeshua in God. Thus, aside from Yeshua’s sacrifice “there is no further sacrifice”. Those who rebel against Yeshua must repent before Yeshua in order to return to right relationship with God. 28 Anyone who despised, rejected, violated (atheteo[G], yafeir[H]) the Torah[H] (nomos[G]) of Moshe[H] (Moses, drawn out, resurrected) died (apothnesko[G], mot[H]) without mercy (oiktirmos[G], yamut beliy chemlah[H]) on the testimony of two or three witnesses (martus[G], eidiym[H]). 29 How much more severe (cherion[G]) a punishment (timoria[G], haonesh[H]) do you think that one will deserve who has trampled underfoot (katapateo[G], sheromeis beragelo[H]) the Son (Ho Uihos[G], et-Ben[H]) of God (Theos[G], Ha-Elohiym[H]), and has regarded, makes (hegeomai[G], veoseh[H]) as unclean, unholy, common (koinos[G]) the blood (ho aima[G], et-dam[H]) of the covenant (ho diatheke[G], ha-briyt[H]) by which that one was sanctified (hagiazo[G], mekudash[H]), and has insulted the Spirit (Pneuma[G], Ruach[H]) of grace, kindness, charity, practical love (charis[G], ha-chesed[H])? 28 Anyone who despised, rejected, violated the Torah[H] of Moshe[H] died without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses. Nomos[G] & Torah[H] here refer specifically to the five books of Moses. “Rejected the Torah” This does not mean “refused it once or twice” but is in reference to wilful and ongoing law breaking. In short, an intentional and perpetual lifestyle of sin. Hence, “without mercy” because mercy is offered to all alongside forgiveness, but only the repentant receive it. This corresponds to the reference to “wilful sin” in verse 26. “died without mercy” In the case of the rebellion of Korah this concerns a corporeal death. This is a physical sign pointing to the second death of those who reject the King Messiah Yeshua (Rev. 20:14). It is interesting by way of prophetic symbolism, to note that given the meaning of Moses name (Moshe - drawn out/resurrected one), we could read, “Anyone who rejected the instruction of the drawn out/resurrected one, died on the testimony of two or three witnesses.” This too is a prophetic sign pointing to Yeshua. “two or three witnesses” Devarim (Deuteronomy) 17:6, 19:15. 29 How much more severe a punishment do you think that one will deserve who has trampled underfoot the Son of God, and has regarded, makes as unclean, unholy, common the blood of the covenant by which that one was sanctified, and has insulted the Spirit of grace, kindness, charity, practical love? “How much more” is the second clause of a rabbinical form of argument called “kal v’chomer” (lit. easy and substantial). Some call this method “light and heavy”, and it is close in practice to fortiori, a Latin phrase which literally means "from the stronger (argument)", a technique employed in legal arguments. We know that the Torah of Moses and its sacrificial system cannot atone for sin: “For whosoever shall keep the whole Torah, and yet breaks it in one point, that one is guilty of breaking it all.” -Yaakov (James) 2:10 If then one who despised the Torah that could not atone eternally was put to death (corporeal), how much more will the one who despises the eternally effective sacrificial blood of Messiah Yeshua, suffer a death that is incorporeal, eternal. The blood of Yeshua atones eternally, and the refusal of it denotes eternal condemnation for the refuser. “who has trampled underfoot the Son of God” This is the stronger descriptor (portion) that completes a kal v’chomer argument begun in Hebrews 6:4-6, where we read: “4 For it is impotent, weak in the case of those who have once been enlightened, illuminated, seen the light [alt. have already lifted up their eyes to the light: alt. #2 have descended to immersion[A]], and have tasted, eaten of the heavenly gift and have been made partakers, partners of the Holy Spirit, 5 and have tasted, eaten the good breathed word of God and the powers, miracles of the world to come, 6 If they also then fall away, to renew them again to repentance, returning, because they again crucify to themselves the Son of God and put Him to public shame. Rejection of Messiah Yeshua’s sacrificial blood shed during His death on the cross is worse than crucifying Him again (metaphorically speaking) [Heb.6:4-6], because it denies even the effectiveness of the crucifixion. “the blood of the covenant” refers specifically to the blood of the new (better) covenant in Messiah Yeshua’s blood (ref. Heb. 9:20, 13:20; Ex. 24:8;Matt. 26:28; Mk. 14:24). 30 For we see, perceive, understand, know (eido[G], yada’enu[H]) Him who said (ha-omeir[H]), “Vengeance is Mine (Liy nakam[H]), I will repay (ashaleim[H]).” [Deut. 32:35] And again, “The Lord (YHVH) will judge (yadiyn[H]) His people (amo[H]).” [Deut. 32:36; Psalms 135:14] 31 It is a terrifying, fearful (phoberos[G], mah-nora[H]) thing [a constant phobia] to fall into the hands (cheir[G], beyad[H]) of the living God (zao Theos[G], Elohiym chayiym[H]). 32 But remember (anamimnesko[G], zichru na[H]) the former, first (proteron[G], harishoniym[H]) days (hemera[G], et hayamiym[H]), when, after being enlightened (photizo[G], oru[H]), you endured, your eyes have seen (hupomeno[G], eiyneiychem[H]) a great (polus[G], rabiym[H]) fight, struggle, contest (athlesis[G], neshatem[H]) of sufferings, tortures (pathema[G], inuyim[H]), 30 For we see, perceive, understand, know Him who said, “Vengeance is Mine, I will repay.” [Deut. 32:35] And again, “The Lord (YHVH) will judge His people.” [Deut. 32:36; Psalms 135:14] 31 It is a terrifying, fearful thing [a constant phobia] to fall into the hands of the living God. 32 But remember the former, first days, when, after being enlightened, you endured, your eyes have seen a great fight, struggle, contest of sufferings, tortures, “It is a terrifying, fearful thing [a constant phobia] to fall into the hands of the living God.” For the faithful follower of Yeshua, having become a child of God it is an awesome and secure thing to fall into the hands of the Father, but for the one who rejects God’s loving sacrificial offer of redemption, reconciliation and life in relationship with Him (v.29), it is a constant phobia, a terrifying reality, to fall into the hands of the Judge of the universe without blood atonement to speak in his defence. “remember the former, first days” Both the writer and many of his recipients are first century Levites, priests, many of whom came to faith very early in the development of the body of Messiah. “And the Word of God increased; and the number of the disciples multiplied in Jerusalem greatly, and a great company of the priests were obedient to the faith.” -Acts 6:7 KJV “you endured, your eyes have seen a great fight, struggle, contest of sufferings, tortures,” Sadly the persecution and suffering being referred to here was that of their own Jewish brothers and sisters. The early persecutions suffered by Messiah following Jews were perpetrated by the illegitimate religious leaders of the first century C.E. and are highlighted in the early accounts of Shaul’s (Paul the apostle’s) actions against his fellow Jewish brothers and sisters who were Messiah believing and therefore considered apostate by many of the first century C.E. Jewish religious ruling class. We know that Jewish persecution of Messianic Jews is being addressed here because the scroll was written no later than 70 C.E. and while the persecution of both Jewish and Gentile Messiah followers did begin to increase at that time, empire-wide persecution of all Messiah followers regardless of ethnic or religious associations did not occur on mass until 250-51 C.E. (A.D.) 33 partly (pa’am[H]) by your being made a public spectacle (theatrizo[G]) through insults and distress, and partly by becoming companions, fellow participants (koinonos[G]) with those who were so treated. 34 For you showed sympathy (sumpatheo[G], hitzta’aretem[H]) to me in my bonds (desmon[G]) [alt. to the prisoners] and accepted joyfully (meta chara[G], besimchah[H]) the seizure, spoiling, extorting (harpage[G]) of your possessions (huparchonta[G]), knowing, having learned (ginosko[G], midatechem[H]) in your souls (benafshechem[H]) that you have for yourselves [alt. have in heaven] a better (kreitton[G], kinyan tov[H]) and lasting (meno[G], vekayam[H]), substance (huparxis[G]). 33 partly by your being made a public spectacle through insults and distress, and partly by becoming companions, fellow participants with those who were so treated. 34 For you showed sympathy to me in my bonds [alt. to the prisoners] and accepted joyfully the seizure, spoiling, extorting of your possessions, knowing, having learned in your souls that you have for yourselves [alt. have in heaven] a better and lasting substance. “you showed sympathy to me in my bonds [alt. to the prisoners]” In the case of the singular reading the writer (probably Barnabas, almost certainly a Levite) was imprisoned because of his faith. In the case of the plural reading it refers to numerous Jewish believers imprisoned for their faith in the early days of the growth of the body of Messiah. “accepted joyfully the seizure, spoiling, extorting of your possessions, knowing, having learned in your souls that you have for yourselves [alt. have in heaven] a better and lasting substance.” All believers have a better substance an eternal possession that transcends the temporal possessions of this world (11:10, 13-16, 26, 35; 13:14; Matt. 5:11-12; 6:19-21; Rom. 8:18). “I consider that our present sufferings are not worth comparing with the glory that will be revealed in us.” -Romans 8:18 NIV “Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moths and vermin destroy, and where thieves break in and steal. 20 But store up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where moths and vermin do not destroy, and where thieves do not break in and steal. 21 For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.” -Matthew 6:19-21 NIV 35 Therefore, do not throw away your free, plain, bold, confidence (parrhesia[G]), which has a great (megas[G]) reward (misthapodosia[G], sachar rav[H]). 36 For you have need of patient endurance (hupomone[G], lesavlanut[H]), so that when you have done the will, desire (thelema[G], retzon[H]) of God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]), you may receive (kolumbao[G]) what was promised (epaggelia[G], et-hahavtachah[H]). 35 Therefore, do not throw away your free, plain, bold, confidence, which has a great reward. 36 For you have need of patient endurance, so that when you have done the will, desire of God, you may receive what was promised. The first century Jewish believers are admonished not to give up on their faith in Yeshua the King Messiah, but to instead endure by keeping their eyes on Him and remembering the promise given to them by God, that of an everlasting inheritance. “Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.” -Matthew 5:11-12 NIV “So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen, since what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal.” 2 Corinthians 4:18 NIV 37 “For yet in a very little while, He who is coming will come, and will not delay. [Isaiah 26:20; Hab. 2:3 LXX] [Hebrew text Habakkuk 2:3: Kiy od chazon lamoeid veyafeiach lakeitz velo yechazeiv im-yitmahemah chakeih-lo kiy-bo yavo lo yeachar “For yet a vision to an appointed time and it shall speak, blow, to the end/goal and it will not lie though it waits, wait for it, coming it has come, it will not hesitate.”] 38 But My righteous one will live by faith; [Hab. 2:4] And if he shrinks back, My soul has no pleasure in him.” [LXX and a summation of Hab. 2:5-20] [Hebrew text of Habakkuk 2:4: Hineih upelah lo-yasherah nafsho bo vetzadiyk be’emunato yichyah “Behold, now, pay attention, he is lifted up (has drawn back through pride) and is not upright in his soul, behold, and the just/righteous, by his faith shall he live.”] 37 “For yet in a very little while, He who is coming will come, and will not delay. [Isaiah 26:20; Hab. 2:3 LXX] [Hebrew text Habakkuk 2:3: “For yet a vision to an appointed time and it shall speak, blow, to the end/goal and it will not lie though it waits, wait for it, coming it has come, it will not hesitate.”] The sense of the Hebrew texts of both Habakkuk and Isaiah is that of an urgent coming. The language is conveying the eternally present, now and yet fully aspect of the redemptive work of God (“coming it has come”). Messiah and judgement will speedily come upon all. Therefore, to become focussed on this temporary existence to the degree that we lose sight of the urgent expectancy of Yeshua’s return and the coming judgement and world to come, is one of the greatest threats to the spiritual condition of a believer in any generation. We often hear of people desperate to predict the second coming, the judgement etc. They ask, “Do you believe the day is near? When do you believe He will return?” For all intents and purposes the response of the Scripture to every believer in every generation is “He will return now, He will return in a thousand years, do not ask when He will come but rather, ask ‘When He comes, will He find me faithful’?” 38 But My righteous one will live by faith; [Hab. 2:4] And if he shrinks back, My soul has no pleasure in him.” [LXX and a summation of Hab. 2:5-20] [Hebrew text of Habakkuk 2:4: “Behold, now, pay attention, he is lifted up (has drawn back through pride) and is not upright in his soul, behold, and the just/righteous, by his faith shall he live.”] “See, the enemy (Babylonians, spec. the king of Babylon) is puffed up; his desires are not upright-- but the righteous person will live by his faith, trust.” -Habakkuk 2:4 The writer reminds the Jewish recipients of his work that their ancestors were once faced with a seemingly insurmountable enemy, the Babylonian Empire of ancient times, yet God eventually reduced that empire to nothing as punishment for its pride and idolatry. He further reminds them that throughout the oppression of Israel by the Babylonians there were a righteous remnant of Jews who lived by faith in God and were kept set apart for deliverance. Thus, the difficulties faced by the early Messiah following Jewish recipients of the Scroll to the Hebrews (approx. 60 C.E.) are being likened to Israel’s past sufferings in order to encourage the first century Messiah followers toward the certain promise of the glory (deliverance from their enemies) to come. “Be patient therefore, Jewish brothers and sisters, regarding the coming of the Lord. Behold, the vine dresser waits for the precious fruit of the earth, and has longsuffering patience for it, until He receives the early and latter rain. So also you be patient; establish, brace your hearts, inner being, centre: for the coming of the Lord draws near.” -Yaakov (James) 5:7-8 “And if he shrinks back, My soul has no pleasure in him.” This is a paraphrase based on the Septuagint. However, it is also a summation that pretexts the woes to the wicked recorded in Habakkuk 2:5-20. This phrasing is not included in the Hebrew text of Habakkuk 2:4 and should be understood as an added warning against “Shrinking back”, which means “denying the faith”(v.39). 39 But we are not among those who draw back [through pride per Heb. Hab. 2:4] (hupostole[G], min-hansogiym[H]) to destruction, damnation (apoleia[G]), but of those who have faith, trust, belief (pistis[G], hama’amiyniym[H]) for obtaining the preservation, salvation (peripoiesis[G], lehatziyl[H]) of our souls (psuche[G], nafsheinu[H]). 39 But we are not among those who draw back [through pride per Heb. Hab. 2:4] to destruction, damnation, but of those who have faith, trust, belief for obtaining the salvation, preservation of our souls. “Draw back and be destroyed” is the counterpoint to “Repent (turn toward), Believe and be saved”. The writer is aware that he is by and large addressing true followers of Messiah who need to be encouraged through the use of both warnings and affirmations. To paraphrase: “We are not among those who turn their backs on God and suffer the torment they have chosen over relationship with Him, but we are those who trust, believe, have faith in His holy and pure character, and in Messiah obtain the salvation of our entire being, the preservation and perpetuation of life everlasting.” Copyright 2021 Yaakov Brown “by one offering He has perfected for all time those who are being sanctified” (v.14). Introduction:
The key theme of this chapter or section of the Book to the Hebrews is Messiah’s once for all time substitutionary, sacrificial, atoning death. The writer prefaces his explanation of Messiah’s superior singular sacrifice by reiterating the ineffectual nature of the repeated animal sacrifices and ritual washings that are not more than copies of the heavenly things and therefore, unable to save those who serve according to the requirements of the Torah. By logical extension the writer proves the Levitical system to be ineffectual concerning the complete purging of sin, given the evidence present in the lives of those serving, who continue to be aware of their continued sinful state even after offering the blood of animals. The repetition of the sacrifices being proof in itself of the ineffectiveness of the practices. The Yom Kippur sacrifices are said to be a yearly reminder of sins, which cannot take away sins. The words of Psalms 40:6-8 are attributed to the King Messiah Yeshua, and used in a Midrashic (comparative) sense to show that the blood of animals was never sufficient but that God had always intended the sacrificial system of Torah to point to the Goal of Torah Yeshua (Rom. 10:4). Thus, Yeshua takes away the replica (first order of sacrifices) and establishes the second, the new covenant. Yeshua’s body being offered once for all time, past, present, and future. We note that what Yeshua removes are those aspects of Torah concerning sin, and in this context the sacrifices relating to the ritual atonement for sin. Sin will not exist in the Olam Haba (world to come). Therefore we understand that He does not remove or do away with the eternally present aspects of Torah concerning righteousness in Him. The fact that Messiah now (from our view within time and space and according to the chronology of this sin affected world) sits at the right hand of God, signifies that His work is finished and there is no need for further sacrifices. Thus, in fulfilling His role as Great High Priest, Messiah now (from our view within time and space and according to the chronology of this sin affected world) awaits the subjection of His enemies beneath His footstool as Melekh HaY’hudiym (King of the Jews), Melekh HaOlam, King of the universe (under HaShem the Father). A key understanding of the presently eternal condition of those redeemed in Messiah is spoken, “by one offering He has perfected for all time those who are being sanctified” (v.14). In this we understand both eternal security in Messiah’s finished work concerning our perfect condition in Him outside of time and space, and at the same time are reminded that within time and space we are still being sanctified (made holy) as we become more like Yeshua in every moment, intentionally addressing sin by the guidance of the Holy Spirit and being refined through the process of keeping a short account with God. The writer again attributes the prophecy of Jeremiah 31:31-34 to the Holy Spirit and uses it as a reminder to the redeemed of the fact that by His Spirit in them He has written the eternal Torah of Messiah on their inner person/soul centre. This being evidence which affirms the promise that God will no longer bring to mind perpetually the sins of the redeemed. Therefore, where all the sins of the repentant have been atoned for eternally there is no need for further sacrifices. As is the case with all Scripture (scrolls of the original texts), there are no chapter breaks or verse markers (or punctuation for that matter) in the scroll of the Book to the Hebrews. It’s important to see the text of this chapter as a continuation of the previous chapter, the last verses of chapter 9 being: 27 And just as it is appointed for people to die once, and after this, the judgment, 28 so Messiah also, having been offered once to bear, carry the sins of many, will appear a second time for salvation without reference to, separation from sin, to those who look for, eagerly await Him. BOOK TO THE HEBREWS Chapter 10:1-18 (Author’s translation) 1 For the Torah[H] Law, Instruction having a shadow of the good, beneficial things to come and not the same form, image, figure, likeness, face of those things, can never, with the same sacrifices which they offer continually every year, make those who approach perfect, fully filled, consecrated, whole. 2 Otherwise, wouldn’t they have stopped being offered, because those serving, having once been purged, would no longer have had consciousness of sins? 3 But in those sacrifices there is a recollection, a reminder, a remembrance of sins [missing the mark of God’s holiness] every year. 4 For it is impossible for the blood [in the blood] of bulls and goats to take away, remove, cut off sins [missing the mark of God’s holiness]. 5 Therefore, when He comes into this world, He says, “You have not desired sacrifice and offering, But You have prepared a body for Me; 6 You have not taken pleasure in whole burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin. 7 Then I said, ‘Behold, now, pay attention I am come [It is written of Me in the scroll of the book] To do Your will, O God. [Psalms 40:6-8 LXX]’” 8 After saying above, “Sacrifices and offerings and whole burnt offerings and offerings for sin You have not desired nor have You taken pleasure in them” (which are offered according to the Torah[H]), 9 then He said, “Behold, now, pay attention I have come to do Your will.” He kills, slays, puts to death, takes away the first in order to establish, set firmly in place the second. 10 By this will, we are being sanctified, made holy through the offering of the body, soul of Yeshua[H] HaMashiyach[H] once for all. 11 Every priest individually and collectively, stands daily serving and offering time after time the same sacrifices, which can never take away, remove, atone for sins; 12 but He, having offered one, first agreeable sacrifice for sins forever, sat down in the right hand of God [ Psalms 110:1, 5; Matt.22:44, 26:64; Mark. 12:36, 14:62, 16:19; Luke. 20:42, 22:69; Acts. 2:25, 34, 7:55-56Rom. 8:34; Eph. 1:20; Col. 3:1; Heb. 1:3, 8:1, 10:12, 12:2] 13 From that time onward expectant until His enemies are made a footstool for His feet [Psalms 110:1]. 14 For by one, first agreeable offering He has perfected, made whole forever those who are being sanctified, made holy. 15 The Holy Spirit also witnesses to us; for after saying, 16 “this is the covenant which I will make with them After those days, declares the Lord: And I will write My Instructions (Toratiy[H]) on their minds, understanding, inward parts,” He then says, 17 “And their sins, and their iniquities, perversions I will no longer bring to mind, perpetually.” [Jeremiah 31:31-34]” 18 Now where there is forgiveness, remission, liberty, deliverance of these things, an offering for sin is no longer required. HEBREWS 10:1-18 (line upon line) 1 For the Torah[H] Law, Instruction (nomos[G]) having a shadow (skia[G], tzeil[H]) of the good, beneficial things (agathos[G], tovot[H]) to come and not the same (autos[G]) form, image, figure, likeness, face (eikōn[G], peneiy[H]) of those things, can never, with the same sacrifices (thusia[G]) which they offer (prospherō[G]) continually every year (shanah veshanah[H]), make those who approach perfect, fully filled, consecrated, whole (teleioō[G], shalem[H]). 2 Otherwise, wouldn’t they have stopped being offered (prospherō[G], yechdelu[H]), because those serving (latreuō[G], haovediym[H]), having once (hapax[G], achat[H]) been purged (kathairō[G]), would no longer have had consciousness (suneidēsis[G], machshevet[H]) of sins [missing the mark of God’s holiness] (hamartia[G], hacheite[H])? 1 For the Torah[H] Law, Instruction having a shadow of the good, beneficial things to come and not the same form, image, figure, likeness, face of those things, can never, with the same sacrifices which they offer continually every year, make those who approach perfect, fully filled, consecrated, whole. “For the Torah having a shadow of the good things to come and not the same form, image, likeness, face of those things,” [cf. Heb. 8:5] The Torah is a shadow that replicates but is not the same as the image of the good things of God. A shadow is cast by light shining against an object or person, but if that same light converges with the object or person the shadow disappears. It’s the same with the Torah of Moses. At the end of the age when the Messiah returns and God dwells with humanity in the new creation, the manifest light of God will have become convergent with creation and thus, the shadow of temporal Torah will disappear while the Torah of the Messiah [Gal. 6:2; Rom. 8:2] will remain. A shadow cannot illuminate someone trapped in darkness. Only the light that cast it can do that. “can never, with the same sacrifices which they offer continually every year, make those who approach perfect, fully filled, consecrated, whole.”[cf. Heb. 7:18-19, 28; 9:25] The sacrifices of Torah can never purify the inner person because the blood of its atonement rite is the temporary blood of animals. What is needed is a blood transfusion given by One Who has everlasting blood and is compatible with the recipient. One cannot transfuse a human being with animal blood, nor can incompatible blood types be cross transfused, rather, if you desire to transfuse a number of different blood types using only one donor, you will require a universal donor. In the case of Messiah, His blood is not sin affected and therefore is able to redeem all Who receive His transfused life. “Year after year” or “year and year” shanah veshanah, meaning by implication, from one Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement) to the next. 2 Otherwise, wouldn’t they have stopped being offered, because those serving, having once been purged, would no longer have had consciousness of sins? The logic is sound. If the sacrifices actually removed sin, they would have ceased. Interestingly, following the ultimate sacrifice for sin made by the King Messiah in the first century C.E. the sacrifices did cease (70 C.E.). As a result those Jews who didn’t receive Yeshua the promised Messiah had to reinvent Judaism devoid of the practice of the sacrificial system. Only now millennia after the destruction of the second temple, is there a reasonable expectation of the re-establishment of the temple cult, and even when that happens [Isaiah 2:2-3; 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4; Rev. 11:1-2] the same truth remains, that the Torah and the temple cult, with its temporal animal sacrifices, “can never, with the same sacrifices which they offer continually every year, make those who approach perfect, fully filled, consecrated, whole.”[cf. Heb. 7:18-19, 28; 9:25] The evidence of the effectiveness of the sacrifices would have been seen in both the clear conscience of the one who offered the sacrifice and in his living according to the freedom afforded him. This was not the case, nor is it the case that sacrifices of any kind other than that of the Messiah, can perfect any human being. Many in the body of believers make noble sacrifices in accordance with reflecting Yeshua’s life to others, however this is not done to earn favour but as a result of having been shown favour. Others make sacrifices believing they are somehow atoning for their own sinful acts, they are not, Yeshua is enough, there is no need for further sacrifice of any kind in order to make a human being right before God. Many claim that the good news concerning the King Messiah Yeshua is too simple. In my experience it is the simple things that put to shame the so called “higher” understanding of the intellectual elite. 3 But in those sacrifices (bakarbanot[H]) there is a recollection, a reminder, a remembrance (anamnēsis[G], yesh zeicher[H]) of sins [missing the mark of God’s holiness] (hamartia[G], lachataiym[H]) every year (shanah veshanah[H]). 4 For it is impossible (adunatos[G]) for the blood [in the blood] (ho aima[G], bedam[H]) of bulls (tauros[G], pariym[H]) and goats (tragos[G], ushiyriym[H]) to take away, remove, cut off (aphaireō[G]) sins [missing the mark of God’s holiness] (hamartia[G], chataiym [H]). 3 But in those sacrifices there is a recollection, a reminder, a remembrance of sins [missing the mark of God’s holiness] every year. I’ve been asked by some of our yeshivah students, “Why were the sacrifices given at all if they could never remove sin?” While there are many reasons, the present verse gives just one, the sacrifices are given as a constant reminder of sin. The sacrifices themselves are an indictment against sin and a reminder of the need for something better by way of effectual atonement. “Every year” ultimately refers to Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement) [Lev. 16]. As we approach the High Holy Days again this year we are reminded of sin and the need for blood atonement. In short, the yearly Yom Kippur sacrifices remind all Israel individually and collectively of our sin and our need for something better than animal sacrifices to atone for it. In spite of the fact that Judaism reinvented itself at Yavneh (located west of Jerusalem on the coast next to the Mediterranean ocean) [90 C.E.] following the destruction of the temple (70 C.E.), and in spite of the fact that we no longer have animal sacrifices as a reminder, we nonetheless have prayers (selichot) and protocols during the High Holy Days that cause us to think again about the requirement of blood atonement and the fact that we cannot save ourselves but are reliant on the saving work of God for the forgiveness of sin, right standing before Him and receipt of eternal life in the Olam Haba (world to come), an assurance that our names are written in HaShem’s book of life [Ex. 32:31-33; Dan. 12:2; Mal. 3:16; Ps. 56:8, 69:27-28, 139:16; Lk. 10:20; Philippians 4:3; Heb. 12:22-23; Rev 3:5, 13:8, 17:8, 20:15, 21:27]. Our daily prayers and liturgies remind us of the sacrifices of old (Sacharit [the morning prayer service] includes portions regarding the sacrifices), and of our sinful condition and our need for forgiveness (Amidah [standing] prayer, Tachanuniym [supplications]). Even devoid of a physical temple and in spite of our rabbis’ attempts to refocus us on halakhah (applied law) rather than sacrificial atonement, we are nonetheless constantly reminded of our sinful condition and our need for atonement, forgiveness and redemption. On his death bed one of rabbinic Judaism’s greatest rabbis, the convener of the council of Yavneh (90 C.E.) Rabbi Yochanan Ben-Zakkai says: "Now I am being led before the supreme King of Kings, the Holy One, blessed be He, who lives and endures forever and ever. If He is angry with me, He is angry forever. If He imprisons me, He imprisons me forever. If He puts me to death, He puts me to death forever. I can't persuade Him with words or bribe Him with money. Moreover, there are two ways ahead of me: one leads to Gan-Eden [Paradise] and the other to Gey-Hinnom [Torment], and I do not know which one will take me. How can I do anything but weep?" (B'rakhot 28b) -Rabbi Yochanan Ben-Zakkai (Convener of the Council of Yavneh) Awareness of unatoned sin is a constant and condemning reminder to all who reject the once and for all atoning sacrifice of the King Messiah Yeshua. In Messiah we are offered freedom from the uncertainty of the final judgement because in Messiah our names are inscribed in the book of life, written in the immovable and unchanging blood of Yeshua, Who is Imanu-El God with us. Therefore, we both tremble in awe before HaShem (YHVH) and are immutably secure in Him, utterly terrified and completely safe in the arms of our Father, the Creator of all things through Yeshua the King Messiah. Unlike Rav Yochanan Ben Zakkai, we do know which path will take us, that is the path to Gan-Eden (Paradise), the path to Olam Haba (the world to come), and everlasting life. In fact, we are already walking that path in Messiah. “Amen and amen, in established truth I tell you, whoever hears my word and trusts Him who sent me already has eternal living and will not be condemned but has crossed over from death to living.” -John 5:24 (Author’s paraphrase) 4 For it is impossible for the blood [in the blood] of bulls and goats to take away, remove, cut off sins [missing the mark of God’s holiness]. The reference to bulls and goats implies the Yom Kippur rites (Lev. 16). Once again the actions of the High Priest are brought to mind. “Will I eat the flesh of bulls, or drink the blood of goats?” -Psalms 50:13 KJV HaShem has no need of the blood of animals, He is not like pagan deities who require feeding, rather the sacrificial system of the Torah of Moses is a symbol for Israel and humanity, revealing the spiritual condition of our inner being and showing the great cost of redemption from that condition. Like prayer, the sacrifices of Torah are for our benefit, they do not benefit God, as if He needs anything. 5 Therefore, when He comes into this world (ho kosmos[G], ha olam[H]), He says, “You have not desired sacrifice (thusia[G]) and offering (prosphora[G]), But You have prepared a body (sōma[G]) for Me; 6 You have not taken pleasure in whole burnt offerings (holokautōma[G]) and sacrifices for sin (hamartia[G], chataiym [H]). 7 Then I said, ‘Behold, now, pay attention (hineih[H]) I am come [(hēkō[G]) (It is written of Me in the scroll (kephalis[G]) of the book (biblion[G])] To do Your will (thelēma[G]), O God (Theos[G]). [Psalms 40:6-8 LXX]’” 5 Therefore, when He comes into this world, He says, “You have not desired sacrifice and offering, But You have prepared a body for Me; 6 You have not taken pleasure in whole burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin. 7 Then I said, ‘Behold, now, pay attention I am come [It is written of Me in the scroll of the book] To do Your will, O God. [Psalms 40:6-8 LXX]’” The writer of the Book to the Hebrews is using Psalms 40:6-8 [7-9] in the form of a drash. A mode of teaching prolific among ancient Jewish scholars. “When He comes into the world” This is a Jewish expression denoting birth (Mishnah Rosh Hashanah 1:2; Sifre Deut. 312) and in this context is a reference to the promised King Messiah, Who is understood to be the speaker of the words of Psalms 40:6-8 (LXX) by way of drash (comparative teaching). The full portion from the Hebrew text of Psalms 40:7-9 illuminates further the deeper meaning. The Hebrew text of Psalms 40:7-9 (equivalent to LXX 40:6-8) translates: “7 (6) Blood sacrifice (zevach[H]) and offering (uminchah[H]) have You not desired (lo-chapatzta[H]) ears (aznayim[H]) opened, dug up for me (kariyt liy[H]), whole burnt offerings (olah[H]) and sin offerings (vachata’ah[H]) You did not enquire after (lo sha’alta[H]). 8 (7) Then (az[H]) I said (amartiy[H]), ‘Behold, now, pay attention (Hineih[H]), in/of Me (vatiy[H]) in the scroll of the book (bimgilat-sefer[H]) is written upon/concerning Me (katuv alay[H]). 9 (8) To do Your will [what You want] (la’asot-retzonecha[H]) God (Elohay[H]) delights Me (chapatztiy[H]) and Your instructions/Torah (vetorahtecha[H]) are in the midst (betoch[H]) of My inner being, gut, emotion (meiay[H]). “But You have prepared a body for me” This Septuagint translation differs dramatically from the Masoretic Hebrew text but within the wider context essentially means the same thing. The Hebrew text reads “have You not desired ears opened, dug up for me?” Which is a Hebrew idiom meaning “willing ears, listening and obedient ears, resurrected ears that hear, understand and obey”. This same meaning is conveyed in the Septuagint where the context denotes that God has “prepared a body” for Messiah, and goes on to say that the purpose of His body is “to do” God’s “will.” Ultimately the two texts are saying the same thing in two different but consistent ways. Read convergently they say, “You have prepared a body for me with ears to hear and obey so that I am ready to do Your will…” “I am come [It is written of Me in the scroll of the book] To do Your will, O God.” Again the Hebrew version reads differently as “To do Your will [what You want] God delights Me and Your instructions/Torah are in the midst of My inner being, gut, emotion.” Therefore, the Goal of the Torah, Who is Yeshua the King Messiah, also has the Torah within Him in the sense that He is the Author of it. Thus, “it is written of Me in the Scroll (Torah [kephalis[G]]) of the Book [biblion[G]] (Tanakh)” and “Your Torah is in My inner being”. Both are true, both convey the greater meaning of the text and redemptive purposes of God. There is no contradiction, only convergence. As alluded to, “The Scroll of the Book” refers to the Torah being within the wider Jewish Canon (Tanakh) [ref. Targum and Kimchi on Psalms 40:7]. 8 After saying above, “Sacrifices (thusia[G], zevach[H]) and offerings (prosphora[G], uminchah[H]) and whole burnt offerings (holokautōma[G], (holokautōma[G])and offerings for sin (vachata’ah[H]) You have not desired (thusia[G], lo-chapatzta[H]) nor have You taken pleasure in them” (which are offered according to the Torah[H] [nomos[G]]), 9 then He said, “Behold, now, pay attention (Hineih[H]) I have come to do Your will (thelēma[G], la’asot-retzonecha[H]).” He kills, slays, puts to death, takes away (anaireō[G]) the first (ho protos[G], harishonah[H]) in order to establish, set firmly in place (histēmi[G]) the second (deuteros[G], hasheniyah[H]). 8 After saying above, “Sacrifices and offerings and whole burnt offerings and offerings for sin You have not desired nor have You taken pleasure in them” (which are offered according to the Torah[H]), “Which are offered according to Torah” This clarification emphasises the fact that even sacrifices and offerings offered precisely according to Torah requirements are not ultimately what God provides in order to perfect His children. 9 then He said, “Behold, now, pay attention I have come to do Your will.” He kills, slays, puts to death, takes away the first in order to establish, set firmly in place the second. “I have come to do Your will” These words of the King Messiah and the sacrifice they denote affirm the fact that Yeshua has killed the first order (not the Torah as a whole but the blood covenant, specifically the sacrificial system as it pertains to sin) and set firmly in place the second. So we see that Yeshua’s blood atonement atones for the first covenant and based on the vicarious death experienced by Israel and her Torah in Yeshua, Israel are established in the new covenant through His death which has already been explained in the previous chapter concerning the effectiveness of a covenant being established according to the death of the one who enters it. In short, those who receive Yeshua’s death on their behalf have died vicariously in Him. “He kills, slays, puts to death, takes away the first in order to establish, set firmly in place the second.” This is speaking of the covenants established by Moses and Yeshua respectively and not of Torah as a whole. The first covenant and ritual sacrificial system is killed in order to establish the second. Messiah puts death to death, meaning that He takes away those aspects of Torah concerning the sacrificial system as it relates to sin but does not take away the eternal aspects of Torah which transcend the present sin affected world. This is one of the reasons it is important to qualify what is meant by Torah in any given context. Notice that as Author of the Torah (in God) and its sacrificial signs (Yeshua is the Davar HaEmet [Word essence of the Truth]: John 1:1) Yeshua “kills the first (sacrifices)”, that is, Aharon the High Priest kills the temporal sacrifices based on Yeshua’s (the Word) Instruction in order to point to the manifest sacrifice of Yeshua’s Own soul, which establishes the “better” covenant in eternal blood. 10 By this will (thelēma[G], uvaratzon[H]), we are being (semen[G]) sanctified, made holy (hagiazō[G], mitkadoshiym[H]) through the offering (prosphora[G], bekarban[H]) of the body, soul (sōma[G], nefesh[H]) of Yeshua[H] (Iesous[G], YHVH is Salvation) HaMashiyach[H] (Christos[G], Anointed One) once for all (ephapax[G], echad[H]). 11 Every priest (pas hiereus[G], kol kohen[H]) individually and collectively, stands daily (kata hemera[G], yom yom[H]) serving (leitourgeō[G]) and offering (prospherō[G], ulhakeriyv[H]) time after time (pollakis[G]) the same sacrifices (thusia[G], et-hazvachiym[H]), which can never (oudepote[G], eiyn meiolam[H]) take away, remove, atone for (periaireō[G], lechapeir[H]) sins [missing the mark of God’s holiness] (hamartia[G], chataiym [H]); 12 but He (aval hu[H]), having offered (prospherō[G], hikriyv[H]) one, first agreeable (mia[G], echad[H]) sacrifice (thusia[G], zevach[H]) for sins [missing the mark of God’s holiness] (hamartia[G], chataiym [H]) forever (eis diēnekes[G], ad olam[H]), sat down (kathizō[G], vayeishev[H]) in the right hand (dexios[G], liymiyn[H]) of God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]) [ Psalms 110:1, 5; Matt.22:44, 26:64; Mark. 12:36, 14:62, 16:19; Luke. 20:42, 22:69; Acts. 2:25, 34, 7:55-56; Rom. 8:34; Eph. 1:20; Col. 3:1; Heb. 1:3, 8:1, 10:12, 12:2] 10 By this will, we are being sanctified, made holy through the offering of the body, soul of Yeshua[H] HaMashiyach[H] once for all. “By this will” refers to the substitutionary sacrificial death of Yeshua the King Messiah, the “will” of God to “cause Him to suffer”. “Yet it pleased Adonai to bruise Him. He caused Him to suffer. If He makes His soul a guilt offering, He will see His offspring, He will prolong His days, and the will of Adonai will succeed by His hand.” -Isaiah 53:10 TLV 11 Every priest individually and collectively, stands daily serving and offering time after time the same sacrifices, which can never take away, remove, atone for sins; “Time after time” means every day of every year (Exodus 29:38). As stated previously, the temporary blood of animal sacrifices could never do anything more than provide a symbol in an ineffectual atonement pointing to an effective atonement. As the text says, the sacrifices offered continually could “never atone for sins.” 12 but He, having offered one, first agreeable sacrifice for sins forever, sat down in the right hand of God [ Psalms 110:1, 5; Matt.22:44, 26:64; Mark. 12:36, 14:62, 16:19; Luke. 20:42, 22:69; Acts. 2:25, 34, 7:55-56; Rom. 8:34; Eph. 1:20; Col. 3:1; Heb. 1:3, 8:1, 10:12, 12:2] We note that Messiah’s sacrifice is offered once and first, that is both at His first coming and before the foundation of the world. Put concisely, the sacrifice for the redemption of sin preceded the entry of sin into the world. This sacrifice effective eternally and having affected all who receive Him. Therefore, He takes His place in the right hand of God, the place He has always held (John 17:5), as a symbol of His complete victory over sin and death, a victory He won before the world was created (1 Peter 1:19-20; Rev. 13:8). 13 From that time onward expectant (ekdechomai[G]) until His enemies (echthros[G]) are made a footstool (hupopodion[G]) for His feet (leragelayv[H]) [Psalms 110:1]. 14 For by one, first agreeable (mia[G], echad[H]) offering (prosphora[G], vekarban[H]) He has perfected, made whole (teleioō[G], hishliym[H]) forever (eis diēnekes[G], ad-olam[H]) those who are being sanctified, made holy (hagiazō[G], et-hamkudashiym[H]). 13 From that time onward expectant until His enemies are made a footstool for His feet [Psalms 110:1]. The victory over sin and death won, Messiah awaits (according to our view from within time and space) the subjection of Satan and his minions and all the enemies of God, His King Messiah and His chosen people. This being promised by the Psalm (110:1), established in God [ref. Heb. 1:13]. 14 For by one, first agreeable offering He has perfected, made whole forever those who are being sanctified, made holy. Hebrews 7:11 pointed us here, to the one sacrifice which can bring perfection where the sacrifices and practices of the Levitical priesthood could not. The presently eternal condition of those redeemed in the Messiah is spoken: “by one offering He has perfected for all time those who are being sanctified” (v.14). In this we understand both eternal security in Messiah’s finished work concerning our perfect condition in Him outside of time and space, and at the same time are reminded that within time and space we are still being sanctified (made holy) as we become more like Yeshua in every moment, intentionally addressing sin by the guidance of the Holy Spirit and being refined through the process of keeping a short account with Him. 15 The Holy Spirit (Ho hagios pneuma[G], Ruach HaKodesh[H]) also witnesses (martureō[G], yaed[H]) to us; for after saying, 16 “this (zot[H]) is the covenant (ho diathēkē[G], habriyt[H]) which I will make with them After those days (hēmera[G], hayamiym[H]), declares the Lord (Ho Kurios[G], YHVH[H]): (kardia[G], lebam[H]) And I will write My Instructions (Toratiy[H]) on their minds, understanding, inward parts, (dianoia[G], bekirbam[H]),” He then says, 15 The Holy Spirit also witnesses to us; for after saying, 16 “this is the covenant which I will make with them After those days, declares the Lord: And I will write My Instructions (Toratiy[H]) on their minds, understanding, inward parts,” He then says, “By two or three witnesses every word is established” [Deut. 17:6; 2 Cor. 13:1]. The Witnesses: 1.The Son (Heb. 10:7; Psalm 40:6-8) 2.The Father (Heb. 10:12; Psalm 110:1) 3.The Holy spirit (Heb. 10:16-17; Jeremiah 31:31-34) Therefore, the Holy Spirit also witnesses to the fulness of Messiah’s atonement speaking through the prophet Jeremiah the promised everlasting Torah of Messiah written on the core being of those who receive Him. 17 “And their sins (hamartia[G], ulchatatam[H]) [missing the mark set by God’s holiness], and their iniquities, perversions (anomia[G]) I will no longer bring to mind, perpetually (mnaomai[G], ezkar-od[H]).” [Jeremiah 31:31-34; Hebrews 8:10]” 18 Now where there is forgiveness, remission, liberty, deliverance (aphesis[G]) of these things, an offering (prosphora[G]) for sin [missing the mark of God’s holiness] (hamartia[G], al-hacheite [H]) is no longer required. 17 “And their sins, and their iniquities, perversions I will no longer bring to mind, perpetually.” [Jeremiah 31:31-34; Hebrews 8:10]” 18 Now where there is forgiveness, remission, liberty, deliverance of these things, an offering for sin is no longer required. When we properly understand that Yeshua’s singular sacrifice is sufficient and covers all infringements against Torah, we are truly free to live according to God’s strength, in His Spirit and to allow Messiah in us to outwork righteousness in the way we walk. We no longer seek approval because we have been approved in Messiah. We no longer seek to do for God (an act of idolatry) but instead being in Messiah and having Messiah in us we do from God (righteousness). How is this possible? It is made possible through Messiah’s sacrifice, it is possible because there is now no longer a need for further sacrifice. The text reads literally, “an offering for sin is no longer!” Some of the greatest of our non-Messianic rabbis agree with the writing of the Book to the Hebrews: "in the time to come (the Messianic age) all offerings shall cease, except the sacrifice of praise.'' -Vayikra Rabbah, sect. 9. fol. 153. 1. When, "the King Messiah, the son of David, shall reign, there will be no need of kaparah (an atonement), nor of deliverance, or prosperity, for all these things will be had;'' -Rav Abendana Not. in Miclol Yophi in Psal. lxxii. 20. Yeshua is enough, His sacrifice is enough, those who require more teach apostacy. Copyright 2021 Yaakov Brown Through His shed blood Yeshua gives defiled human beings access to undefiled heavenly things. Introduction:
Hebrews 9:1-14 reminds the reader of the Mishkan (Tent of Meeting) it’s serving priests and its articles, showing them to be replicas that point to the original Mishkan in the heavens. The mercy seat of the heavens being the place where Yeshua the Great High Priest has sprinkled His blood in order to affect eternal atonement for all who receive Him and His saving work. The writer points out that if the blood of goats and bulls (Num. 16), and the ashes of the heifer could affect temporary outward cleansing of the body, then how much more can the blood of Messiah (which is everlasting) purge the soul of a human being, removing the decaying deeds of the sinful nature (yetzer hara). The “goats and bulls” relate to the High Priest’s duties on Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement) relating to both his cleansing and the cleansing of the community of Israel from sin. The ashes of the red heifer mixed with water and applied with hyssop relate to the ritual cleansing of one who has touched a dead body. In both cases death, which is the fruit of sin, is associated to the rites. The writer of Hebrews is intentionally using these examples in order to solidify his point that the physical practices of the earthly sacrificial system cannot save the inner person from the just consequences of sin. With regard to the ashes of the red heifer it is worth noting that the ashes mixed with water for the ritual cleansing of those who touch the dead (a metaphor for touching the fruit of sin), is called “water of separation” (Num. 19:13) because it cleanses ritually cleanses the person from that which “separates” them from God. The writer of the Book to the Hebrews inspired by the Holy Spirit uses this temporal earthly example to point to the fact that Yeshua’s sacrificial death and the sprinkling of His blood (ashes) mixed with water (life) truly and eternally cleanse the inner person of those who receive Him. This has been accomplished and is now offered to all until His return, at which time “separation from sin” (Heb. 9:28) will not be the subject of His coming but to reign in fullness over Judah, Israel and all the nations (those who have received Him). In our previous study we noted that the ark of the covenant (Aron Ha-Briyt) was not present in the holy of holies during the earthly ministry of Messiah in the first century C.E. And that Yeshua never entered the holy of holies on earth but the holy of holies, or the holiest place in the heavens. We also learned that the book of Revelation tells us where the original Aron Ha-Briyt of God is located and that the vein pursuit of the earthly ark that can never affect redemption is an act of idolatry. “Then the Temple of God in heaven was opened, and the Ark of His Covenant appeared in His Temple. And there were flashes of lightning and rumblings and clashes of thunder and an earthquake and heavy hail.” -Revelation 11:19 TLV previous verses: 13 For if the blood of goats and bulls, and the ashes of a heifer sprinkled on those who have become defiled, unclean, sanctify as a means of purifying, cleansing the carnal form, flesh, body, 14 how much more will the blood of the Messiah, Who through the eternal Spirit offered, presented, sacrificed His soul without blemish, mark, spot to God; purge, cleanse, purify your conscience, moral consciousness, heart, core being, inner person from dead, necrotic works, deeds, doing, in order to serve the living God? Before we continue we note again that while Yeshua’s unique priesthood is “like” that of Melki Tzedek (the mortal king and priest of ancient Salem), Yeshua’s practice of atonement is likened to that of the high priest of the Levitical priesthood. Therefore, as previously stated, Yeshua’s priesthood over all peoples presents a convergent likeness that combines elements of both earthly temporal priesthoods. We thus glean understanding from both. BOOK TO THE HEBREWS Chapter 9:15-28 (Author’s translation) 15 And through this He is the mediator, reconciler, go between, messenger advocate of a new covenant, so that, by means of His death we are found redeemed, atoned, purged of the violations that were committed under the first covenant, so that those who have been called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance. [alt. Hebrew text translates as, “that the elect might receive the promised eternal land.”] 16 For where there is a covenant, the death of the one who made it is necessary. 17 For a covenant is valid upon death, because it has no strength while the one who made it lives. 18 Nor was the first covenant consecrated, dedicated without blood. 19 For when Moshe[H] (drawn out, resurrected one) had spoken every commandment to all the people individually and collectively according to the Torah, Instruction, Law, he received/took the blood of the calves and the goats, with water and scarlet wool and hyssop, and sprinkled both the Scroll itself and all the people individually and collectively, 20 saying, “This is the blood of the covenant which God commanded you.” 21 Likewise he sprinkled, threw the blood on both the Tent of Meeting and all the vessels, utensils, implements of the service. 22 And with few exceptions all things individually and collectively are purged, cleansed, purified with blood, according to the Torah, Instruction, Law, and without the shedding of blood there is no remission, liberty, forgiveness, freedom. 23 Therefore it was necessary, right for the copies, patterns, warnings of the things in the heavens to be purged, cleansed, purified with these things, but the heavenly things themselves with better, more excellent sacrifices than these. 24 For the Messiah did not enter a holy place/sanctuary made by human hands, a copy, representation, figure of the true one, but into heaven itself, now to appear before the face of God for us; 25 nor must He offer His soul often, repeatedly, many times like the high priest who enters the Holy place, sanctuary year after year with blood of others. 26 Otherwise, He would have needed to suffer often since the beginning, foundation, conception of the world; but now once at the goal of the ages, generations, the world, forever He has been revealed, manifest to put away, cancel, abolish sin [missing the mark set by God’s holiness] by the sacrifice of His soul. 27 And just as it is appointed for people to die once, and after this, the judgment, 28 so Messiah also, having been offered once to bear, carry the sins of many, will appear a second time for salvation without reference to, separation from sin, to those who look for, eagerly await Him. HEBREWS 9:15-28 (line upon line) 15 And through this (dia touto[G], zot[H]) He is the mediator, reconciler, go between, messenger advocate (mesitēs[G], malakh meiliytz[H]) of a new covenant (kainos diathēkē[G], labriyt hachadashah[H]), so that, by means of His death (Thanatos[G], umoto[H]) we are (nimtza[H]) found redeemed, atoned, purged (apolutrōsis[G], lechaparat[H]) of the violations (parabasis[G], haposhiym tachat[H]) that were committed under the first covenant (protos diathēkē[G], habriyt harishonah[H]), so that those who have been called (kaleō[G]) may receive (lambanō[G]) the promise (epaggelia[G], et-havtachat[H]) of the eternal (aiōnios[G], olam[H]) inheritance (klēronomia[G], nachalat[H]). [alt. Hebrew text translates as, “that the elect might receive the promised eternal land.”] 15 And through this He is the mediator, reconciler, go between, messenger advocate of a new covenant, so that, by means of His death we are found redeemed, atoned, purged of the violations that were committed under the first covenant, so that those who have been called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance. [alt. Hebrew text translates as, “that the elect might receive the promised eternal land.”] “And through this…” Through His blood, the sacrifice of His unblemished soul, the eternal Spirit of God (v. 14). “He is the mediator of a new covenant” In one sense Moses was mediator of the former covenant, but ultimately Yeshua is mediator of both covenants. However, only Yeshua could mediate the new covenant because it is a covenant that requires eternal blood atonement, something that Moses could never have provided. The Greek diathēkē is equivalent to the Hebrew briyt. However, while the Greek diathēkē can mean “covenant” or “testament”, the Hebrew briyt does not carry both meanings in the same sense. There are other Hebrew words like edut (witness, testimony) that better convey the Greco-Roman idea of “testament”. This being said, one of the names of the ark of the covenant is Aron Edut “Ark of Testimony” (Ex. 25:22). Therefore, both meanings are valid. However, the context of the present text denotes a covenant purchased by blood atonement and not a “will” or “testament” signed in anticipation of the death of the other party. Rav Shaul (Paul the Apostle) makes a similar drash in his writing to the Galatian believers (Gal. 3:15-18). The Jewish recipients of the Book to the Hebrews understand “covenant” and not “testament” as in “last will and testament”. Sadly the majority of Christian scholars and commentators (and some Messianics) miss the point entirely by reading into the text a Greco-Roman or modern western understanding of the word diathēkē, seeing it (in spite of the context) as referring to “last will and testament” rather than “Blood Covenant”. Which, based on context, is the intended meaning of the Hebrew writer of this work. Messiah Yeshua is Mediator of the new covenant: “For there is one God, and one mediator between God and people, the man Messiah Yeshua; Who gave himself as a ransom for all, this has now been witnessed to at the proper time.” -1 Timothy 2:5-6 (Author’s Translation) NB: These verses and many others refute the modern scholarship lie that says Messiah’s sacrifice is not a substitution. It clearly is, one who pays with his life a ransom for someone else, is by definition a substitute. Messiah Yeshua’s blood inaugurated and perpetuates the new covenant: “For this is my blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.” -Matthew 26:28 (Author’s Translation) Messiah Yeshua’s sacrificial, substitutionary death purges those who believe from all that the Mosaic covenant could not: “Let it be known unto all of you therefore, both people, and Jewish brothers and sisters, that through this man (Yeshua) is preached unto all of you the forgiveness of sins: And by Him (Yeshua) all that believe are justified from all things, from which you could not be justified by the Torah of Moses.” -Acts 13:38-39 (Author’s Translation) “so that those who have been called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance.” In order to properly understand the impact of this statement we must understand the Biblical historic weight of it. The Hebrew translation of this same statement reads: “that the elect (chosen) might receive the promised eternal land”. While it is true that all who believe both of the Jews and the nations, are given access to the eternal promise of inheritance in the family of God, it is nonetheless a secondary understanding. First and foremost, as understood by the first century Jewish recipients of this work, the “promise of eternal inheritance” relates to the fulfilment of the covenant promise made by God to Avraham and conferred upon Isaac and Jacob and thus the descendants of Jacob, Israel, the Jewish people. That eternal promise being for the inheritance of the land. The word "inherit" (leishtah[H] [to inherit], from the root yarash, yaresh)is first used in the Tanakh (OT) in connection with the promise concerning the land: “He also said to him, “I am the Lord, who brought you out of Ur of the Chaldeans to give you this land to inherit (leishtah[H]).” -Genesis 15:7 The covenant for the land was made by God while Avram (soon to be Avraham) was unconscious. Therefore, the fulfilment of the promise for the land is entirely incumbent upon God, Who in faithfulness will bring about its eternal outworking. “As the sun was setting, Abram fell into a deep sleep, and a thick and dreadful darkness came over him… When the sun had set and darkness had fallen, a smoking fire pot with a blazing torch appeared and passed between the pieces. 18 On that day the Lord made a covenant with Abram and said, “To your descendants I give this land,” -Genesis 15”12, 17-18 NIV The fact that God’s giving of the land to Israel (through Avraham) is eternal is testified to by Scripture: “The whole land of Canaan, where you now reside as a foreigner, I will give as an everlasting possession to you and your descendants after you; and I will be their God.” -Genesis 17:8 NIV Therefore, reading the present text (Heb. 9:15b) as a first century Jewish believer, we understand the meaning as “that the elect (descendants of Jacob who are in right standing with God through faith) might receive the promised eternal land”. We must keep in mind that the terms “elect” and “chosen” when used by the new covenant Jewish writers, are understood to be speaking first and foremost of the chosen people Israel (ethnic, religious, empirical, chosen). This is not an act of pride on the part of the writers but a matter of Biblical fact. While it remains true that all regardless of ethnicity are welcomed into the eternal inheritance of God through Messiah Yeshua, that is not what is first being said here. It is often the case that our election and stubbornness as Jews is used by God to protect us from apostasy, as is alluded to by Messiah in Matthew 24:24. Rabbi Shaul’s (Paul) letter to the Galatian believers (Galatians 3-4), both Jewish and Gentile, is a superb commentary on Torah, election and faith as observed through the lens of the writer of the Book to the Hebrews. It illuminates the application of these ethno-religious promises to all believers providing the order of the promises are respected and access to them is understood as a privilege in Messiah Yeshua and not an opportunity to do away with the chosen (elect) descendants of Jacob to whom they were first given and continue to be first offered (Rom. 1:16). 16 For where there is a covenant (diathēkē[G], briyt[H]), the death (thanatos[G], mot[H]) of the one who made it (diatithemai[G]) is necessary (anagkē[G]). 17 For a covenant (diathēkē[G], briyt[H]) is valid upon death (epi nekros[G], hamavet[H]), because it has no strength (ischuō mepote[G]) while the one who made it (diatithemai[G]) lives (zaō[G], bechayeiy[H]). 18 Nor was the first covenant (protos diathēkē[G], habriyt harishonah[H]) consecrated, dedicated (egkainizō[G], chanukat[H]) without blood (aima[G], dam[H]). 16 For where there is a covenant, the death of the one who made it is necessary. “For where there is a covenant, the death of the one who made it is necessary.” The death of the one who made it refers to the death purchased on behalf of the one who made it. There is no instance in the Torah where a person entering a covenant with God is required to give their own blood (life) in order to affect that covenant. Even Isaac received a substitutionary reprieve (Gen 22). The covenants of the Tanakh (OT) with few exceptions (and then by inference) are ratified in blood. The blood shed is shed on behalf of the life of the one who is entering the covenant. Therefore, “where there is a covenant, the death of the one who made it is necessary”, means, the vicarious death of another (an animal) on behalf of the one (a human being) entering the covenant. This verse does not refer to a “last will and testament” or covenant in the sense of “Testament” as so many conclude in error. It cannot, because the preceding and proceeding verses speak specifically of a blood covenant ratified according to the practices outlined in Torah and according to those covenants entered into by our forebears from Adam to Noah, to Abraham, to Jacob, to Israel. To misunderstand this covenant as referring to a last will and testament is to entirely misunderstand the meaning of the text. 17 For a covenant is valid upon death, because it has no strength while the one who made it lives. “a covenant is valid upon death” The death of a substitutionary animal is required in order for a covenant to be ratified (Gen. 8:20; 9:9; 15:9, 17-18; 17:11; Ex. 24:1-8). That animal dies on behalf of the one entering the covenant. Therefore, it is as if that one has died. In the case of the new covenant Messiah Yeshua is the substitutionary sacrifice, and His blood causes the one who enters this new covenant to become dead to sin and alive in Messiah. “For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that makes an atonement for the soul.” -Leviticus 17:11 “it has no strength while the one who made it lives.” No covenant is binding without a substitutionary sacrifice of blood made on behalf of the one entering it. It is the vicarious death of another that gives a covenant strength (according to Torah). 18 Nor was the first covenant consecrated, dedicated without blood. This verse shows that a Biblical covenant is being referred to by the writer and not a Greco-Roman “last will and testament”. The “first covenant” refers to the Mosaic covenant, which was, like the new covenant, ratified with blood. Did Moses die in order for the Mosaic covenant to become of affect? Of course not. Was it the blood of the people of Israel that was shed in order for the Mosaic covenant to be ratified? Of course not. But it was the blood of animals that was shed in their place, so that the covenant might be ratified through the vicarious death of animals representing the death of the people who entered the covenant (Exodus 24:1-8). Therefore, the same is true of the new covenant which is established through the substitutionary sacrifice of Yeshua, whose blood is of everlasting affect. 19 For when Moshe[H] (drawn out, resurrected one) had spoken every commandment (entolē[G], mitzvah[H]) to all the people individually and collectively (pas ho laos[G], kol ha’am[H]) according to the Torah, Instruction, Law (ho nomos[G], haTorah[H]), he received/took (lambanō[G]) the blood (ho aima[G], hadam[H]) of the calves (moschos[G], va’agaliym[H]) and the goats (tragos[G], se’iyriym[H]), with water (hudōr[G]) and scarlet (Kokkinos[G]) wool (erion[G]) and hyssop (hussōpos[G]), and sprinkled (rhantizō[G]) both the Scroll (biblion[G]) itself and all the people individually and collectively (pas ho laos[G], kol ha’am[H]), 20 saying, “This is the blood (ho aima[G], hadam[H]) of the covenant (ho diathēkē[G], habriyt[H]) which God (Theos[G], Elohiym[G]) commanded (entellomai[G], tzivah[H]) you.” 19 For when Moshe[H] (drawn out, resurrected one) had spoken every commandment to all the people individually and collectively according to the Torah, Instruction, Law, he received/took the blood of the calves and the goats, with water and scarlet wool and hyssop, and sprinkled both the Scroll itself and all the people individually and collectively, 20 saying, “This is the blood of the covenant which God commanded you.” “3 So Moses came and told the people all the words of Adonai as well as all the ordinances. All the people answered with one voice and said, “All the words which Adonai has spoken, we will do.” 4 So Moses wrote down all the words of Adonai, then rose up early in the morning, and built an altar below the mountain, along with twelve pillars for the twelve tribes of Israel. 5 He then sent out young men of Bnei-Yisrael, who sacrificed burnt offerings and fellowship offerings of oxen to Adonai. 6 Then Moses took half of the blood and put it in basins and the other half he poured out against the altar. 7 He took the Scroll of the Covenant and read it in the hearing of the people. Again they said, “All that Adonai has spoken, we will do and obey.” 8 Then Moses took the blood, sprinkled it on the people, and said, “Behold the blood of the covenant, which Adonai has cut with you, in agreement with all these words.” -Exodus 24:3-8 TLV Moses sprinkled the scroll of the Torah in order to acknowledge its requirement for blood atonement (Lev. 17:11). He sprinkled blood on the people to show that blood had been shed on their behalf so that they had died symbolically according to the vicarious blood of the animal sacrifices. We note that the blood is of the covenant, meaning that blood shed is an intrinsic and necessary part of binding covenant. This is attested to throughout the Tanakh (OT). While it is not mentioned elsewhere in Scripture that Moses sprinkled the Torah scroll, it is nonetheless mentioned here. Objections to the truth of the present text are a rejection of its inspiration and therefore a rejection of God’s Word. 21 Likewise (homoiōs[G]) he sprinkled, threw the blood (ho aima[G], hadam[H]) on (rhantizō[G], zarak[H]) both the Tent of Meeting (skēnē[G], ha-Mishkan[H]) and all the vessels, utensils, implements (skeuos[G], keleiy hashareit[H]) of the service (leitourgia[G]). 22 And with few exceptions (schedon[G]) all things (hakol[H]) individually and collectively (pas[G]) are purged, cleansed, purified (katharizō[G], yithar[H]) with blood (aima[G], badam[H]), according to the Torah, Instruction, Law (ho nomos[G], haTorah[H]), and without the shedding of blood (aima[G], dam[H]) there is no remission, liberty, forgiveness, freedom (aphesis[G], eiyn slichah[H]). 23 Therefore it was necessary, right (anagkē[G], nachom[H]) for the copies, patterns, warnings (hupodeigma[G]) of the things in the heavens (ho Ouranos[G], hashamayim[H]) to be purged, cleansed, purified (katharizō[G], letaheir[H]) with these things, but the heavenly (epouranios[G]) things themselves with better, more excellent sacrifices (thusia[G], toviym mei’eileh[H]) than these. 21 Likewise he sprinkled, threw the blood on both the Tent of Meeting and all the vessels, utensils, implements of the service. While it is not mentioned elsewhere in Scripture that Moses sprinkled the Mishkan (Tent of Meeting), Leviticus 18:15, 19 speak of sprinkling blood on both the altar and Aaron the high priest, and thus infer the sprinkling of the Tent and utensils. Additionally Josephus the first century C.E. historian writes that consecration was made upon “the Tent and the vessels which belonged to it, both with oil that had first been incensed, and with the blood of bulls and rams." (Antiquities of the Jews 3:8:6) 22 And with few exceptions all things individually and collectively are purged, cleansed, purified with blood, according to the Torah, Instruction, Law, and without the shedding of blood there is no remission, liberty, forgiveness, freedom. “And with few exceptions” Some things were purged by water and some by fire (Numbers 31:23). The exceptions relate to ritual uncleanness and not to the atonement of sin committed either in ignorance or by wilful intention. Therefore, the exceptions do not relate to the remission of sin. This is why the writer makes clear that without the shedding of blood there can be no remission (forgiveness) of sin (Exodus 29-30; Leviticus 1-9, 14-17). “all things individually and collectively are purged, cleansed, purified with blood, according to the Torah, Instruction, Law” The Torah states explicitly, “For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that makes an atonement for the soul.” -Leviticus 17:11 “without the shedding of blood there is no remission, liberty, forgiveness, freedom.” The life is in the blood, whereas sin entered the world and brought death with it. In order to remove death, life is required. But the blood of animals could never do more than temporarily and symbolically cover sin. What is needed is not a temporary picture of redemption through blood but an eternal blood transfusion of the life blood of God. Sin cannot be removed any other way. There is no forgiveness or the freedom it brings without the shedding of blood. Jewish tradition agrees, saying “eiyn kaparah alay badam” (no atonement except that made in blood) [Talmud Bavliy Yoma, fol. 5. 1. Zebachim, fol. 6. 1. & Menachot, fol. 93. 2.]. “Does the placing of hands atone for one’s sins? Isn’t atonement accomplished only by the sprinkling of the blood, as it is stated: “For it is the blood that makes atonement by reason of the life” (Leviticus 17:11)?” -Talmud Bavliy Yoma 5a. 2. Sefaria translation In light of modern medical research the transfusion analogy is poignant. It has been observed that in cases where leukaemia patients receive bone marrow transplants, that their blood DNA changes to replicate the donor’s blood DNA. In the case of Messiah we receive a spiritual transfusion in His blood that purges our DNA of sin and causes us to take on, in a spiritual and transcendent sense, His genomic DNA, thus, becoming brothers and sisters who share in His sinless humanity. 23 Therefore it was necessary, right for the copies, patterns, warnings of the things in the heavens to be purged, cleansed, purified with these things, but the heavenly things themselves with better, more excellent sacrifices than these. The earthly copies of the heavenly things required cleansing, but the heavenly things themselves are made accessible to sin affected humanity by more excellent sacrifices than those of animals. "and thou shalt take the anointing oil, and thou shalt anoint the tabernacle, and all that is in it; and thou shall sanctify it, because of the crown of the kingdom of the house of Judah, and the King Messiah, who shall redeem Israel in the latter days.'' -Targum Yonatan Exodus 40:9 The heavenly things did not need purging or purifying, rather through His shed blood Yeshua gives defiled human beings access to undefiled heavenly things. 24 For the Messiah (Christos[G], ha-Mashiyach[H]) did not enter a holy place/sanctuary (hagion[G]) made by human hands (cheiropoiētos[G], biydeiy adam[H]), a copy, representation, figure (antitupon[G]) of the true one (ho alēthinos[G]), but into heaven itself (ouranos[G], hashamayim[H]), now (nun[G]) to appear before the face (prosōpon[G], peneiy[H]) of God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]) for us; 25 nor must (hina[G]) He offer (prospherō[G], lehak’riyv[H]) His soul (et nafsho[H]) often, repeatedly, many times (pollakis[G]) like the high priest (ho archiereus[G], Kohen hagadol[H]) who enters the Holy place, sanctuary (ho hagion[G], el-hakodesh[H]) year after year with blood (aima[G], dam[H]) of others (allotrios[G], acheiriym[H]). 24 For the Messiah did not enter a holy place/sanctuary made by human hands, a copy, representation, figure of the true one, but into heaven itself, now to appear before the face of God for us; “Messiah did not enter a holy place/sanctuary made by human hands” Yeshua never entered the holy of holies of the second temple. Rather He entered the Holiest Place of which the earthly Mishkan (Tent) and Mikdash (Temple) were temporal replicas. “now to appear before the face of God for us” Yeshua is “now” before the face of God for us. This is an eternally present statement that gives us assurance of everlasting security in Him. This statement was true for the first century C.E. recipients and remains true for all who receive Yeshua. “My children, I am writing these things to you so that you will not sin. But if anyone does sin, we have an Intercessor with the Father—the righteous Messiah Yeshua. 2 He is the atonement for our sins, and not only for our sins but also for the whole world.” -1 John 2:1-12 TLV 25 nor must He offer His soul often, repeatedly, many times like the high priest who enters the Holy place, sanctuary year after year with blood of others. Messiah’s sacrifice is of eternal affect. Unlike the high priests of the Levitical priesthood He need not offer sacrifices for Himself because He is sinless, without blemish. Therefore, He has died once for all and stands perpetually before the face of God to intercede on behalf of those who have received His vicarious sacrifice. 26 Otherwise, He would have needed to suffer (paschō[G]) often since the beginning, foundation, conception (katabolē[G], meireishiyt[H]) of the world (kosmos[G], haolam[H]); but now (nun[G]) once (hapax[G], echat[H]) at the goal (sunteleia[G]) of the ages, generations, the world, forever (aiōn[G], hadorot[H]) He has been revealed, manifest (phaneroō[G]) to put away, cancel, abolish (eis athetēsis[G]) sin (hamartia[G], et hacheite[H]) [missing the mark set by God’s holiness] by the sacrifice (thusia[G], bezevach[H]) of His soul (nafsho[H]). 27 And just as it is appointed (apokeimai[G]) for people (beneiy adam[H]) to die (apothnēskō[G], lamot[H]) once (hapax[G], echat[H]), and after this, the judgment (krisis[G], hamishpat[H]), 28 so Messiah (Christos[G], ha-Mashiyach[H]) also, having been offered (prospherō[G]) once (hapax[G], echat[H]) to bear, carry (anapherō[G]) the sins (hamartia[G], cheite[H]) of many, will appear (optanomai[G]) a second (deuteros[G], sheiniyt[H]) time for salvation (sōtēria[G], liyeshuah[H]) without reference to, separation from (chōris[G]) sin (hamartia[G], cheite[H]), to those who look for, eagerly await (apekdechomai[G], yeiraeh[H]) Him. 26 Otherwise, He would have needed to suffer often since the beginning, foundation, conception of the world; but now once at the goal of the ages, generations, the world, forever He has been revealed, manifest to put away, cancel, abolish sin [missing the mark set by God’s holiness] by the sacrifice of His soul. Because of His perfect sacrifice Messiah need not die many times, over and over again. Nor has He need of somehow retrospectively atoning for the righteous ones of our past. Yeshua the Messiah is resurrected and transcendent unbound by time and space and is therefore able to save all (from Adam to the last human born into time and space) through His blood. “19 but with precious blood like that of a lamb without defect or spot, the blood of Messiah. 20 He was chosen before the foundation of the world, but was revealed in these last times for your sake.” - 1 Peter 1:19-20 TLV “8 All inhabitants of the earth will worship the beast—all whose names have not been written in the Lamb’s book of life, the Lamb who was slain from the creation of the world.” -Revelation 13:8 NIV “but now once at the goal of the ages, He has been revealed, to abolish sin by the sacrifice of His soul.” Now (in the first century C.E.) and now (in the present), Yeshua is manifest as the Goal of the Torah (Rom. 10:4), the mediator of a better covenant in His blood, one that brings eternal atonement and everlasting life for all who receive Him. So that both those who “now” received Him in the first century C.E. and those who “now” receive Him in our time, have already passed from death into His eternal life. Our spiritual DNA has changed. 27 And just as it is appointed for people to die once, and after this, the judgment, This verse puts death to the false claims of those who say they have died and literally been to heaven and have come back to shared their experiences. While according to Scripture (2 Cor. 12:2-4) one can claim to have experienced a vision of paradise (Gan Eden, Bosom of Abraham ref. Luke 16:19-31) as convergent with the third heaven (not heaven but a part of Sheol), one cannot legitimately claim to have actually, physically or metaphysically entered the heaven of heavens (John 3:13; Heb. 9:27; Luke 23:43)[note that Elijah was taken into “hashamayim” the heavens pl. and not into the heaven of heavens in particular (2 Kings 2). Also in the case of Enoch who “was not”, heaven is not mentioned (Gen 5:24). The Scripture does not say “it is appointed to human beings to die and spend time in heaven and then come back for a while and die again etc…” But, “It is appointed to human beings to die once and then the judgement”, not “and then some other things and then the judgement”, but “and then the judgement” which by necessity precedes what Christians mistakenly call “heaven”, but is actually the Olam haba (world to come). Only following the judgement do we dwell forever in the Olam Haba (World to come), prior to that the redeemed await the judgement in Paradise (Bosom of Abraham, Gan Eden). Those Scriptures used to support the counterfeit experiences of those who have “passed” and been revived, when examined closely, affirm the present text rather than being divergent in their meaning. This verse also puts to death the false idea of the ghosts of human souls, which in reality are demonic spirits (false elohim [gods]) masquerading as departed human souls. This is extremely important in light of the many foolish misinterpretations of Hebrews 12:1 and 1 Samuel 28:3-21. According to this verse there are two steps between the present temporal life and the Olam Haba (world to come) [mis referred to by Christians as “heaven”]: 1. The death of the human being as a result of the sin affected world 2. Judgement. There are no intermediary stages mentioned, nor does the wealth of Scripture support such stages. Those who teach otherwise teach apostasy. ***For Additional Study*** An explanation of the verses commonly used in an attempt to circumvent the truth of Hebrews 9:27. My commentary on 1 Samuel 28:3-21 https://www.bethmelekh.com/yaakovs-commentary---15081497151214931513-1497150615111489/1-samuel-283-21-saul-and-the-witch-of-eyn-dor Hebrews 12:1 The allusion to the cloud of witnesses in Hebrews 12 is referring back to the list of those witnesses to God’s faithfulness who are listed in Hebrews 11, commonly known as the Faith Chapter. These witnesses, as can be seen from Hebrews 11, are the now deceased patriarchs and heroes of the Jewish faith. The writer of Hebrews, a Jew and a Kohen (Priest), knows that the witnesses he is referring to are deceased and that many of them are buried throughout the land of Israel, and that they are therefore uncontactable according to the teaching of Scripture regarding the dead (Hebrews 9:27). In the parable of Lazarus and the Rich Man (Luke 16) Yeshua explains that while the dead are conscious, they are not able either to traverse the chasm between Gehinnom (torment) and Gan Eden (Paradise) nor (re: Lazarus etc. once they are finally deceased [Hebrews 9:27]) are they able to traverse the distance between Sheol and the present world. In my article on Saul, Samuel and the Witch of Eyndor, I explain why the events of 1 Samuel 28:3-21 are not describing the dead spirit of Samuel called up but rather an evil spirit that fools both the witch and Saul, and is subsequently used by God to condemn Saul (ref. see link above). The writer of the book of Hebrews is using the deceased Jewish witnesses of Hebrews 11 as a figurative example. When he says: “Therefore, since we have such a great cloud of witnesses lying around us, let us also get rid of every weight and entangling sin. Let us run with endurance the race set before us, focusing on Yeshua, the author and perfecter of faith.” –Hebrews 12:1-2a He is making a drash (inquiry/comparative teaching) regarding how we should act in light of the figurative (not literal) cloud of witnesses that are buried throughout the land of Israel. We must remember that the writer is probably writing from the perspective of a priest living in the Land of Israel prior to the destruction of the Temple in 70 C.E (A.D). He then qualifies this teaching by instructing us, not to focus on the cloud of witnesses, but on Yeshua, the author and perfecter of our faith (The faith that our Jewish forebears shared in the coming Messiah Yeshua). We cannot engage with this cloud of witnesses because they are deceased and according to Scripture (Hebrews 9:27) they are uncontactable. Those who do seek to speak to the dead are in fact speaking with demonic forces rather than the spirits of dead people (1 Timothy 4:1; 1 Corinthians 10:20-21; 2 Corinthians 11:14-15). “Let no one be found among you who sacrifices his son or daughter in the fire, who practices divination or sorcery, interprets omens, engages in witchcraft, or casts spells, or who is a medium or spiritist or who consults the dead.” –Deuteronomy 18:10-12 Therefore, not only are we unable to engage with the dead witnesses of Hebrews 11-12, we are also commanded by God not to attempt to speak with the dead. 1 Peter 3:14-21 “If you suffer for righteousness' sake, be glad: and don’t be afraid of their terror, neither be troubled; But sanctify (Kiddush) HaShem (Merciful) Elohiym (Judge) in your core being (heart): and be ready always to give an answer to every human being that asks you the reason for the hope that is in you with humility and reverent awe: Having a good conscience; that, whereas they speak evil of you, as of evildoers, they may be ashamed who falsely accuse your good conduct in Messiah. For it’s better if God’s will is that you suffer for doing well than for doing evil. For Messiah also at one time suffered for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, that He might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh but made alive in the Ruach (Spirit). By Whom (The Spirit) He also went and made proclamation to the ruachiym (spirits) in prison (phulake: foo-lak-ay). Who were formerly disobedient, when at one time the longsuffering God waited in the days of Noach (Comfort), while the ark was being prepared, in which a few, that is eight souls (nefesh) were saved by water (mikveh: gathering of water). This figurative likeness being a representation of the immersion (baptism) that now also saves us (not the washing of the flesh but the earnest seeking of a good conscience toward God) by the resurrection of Yeshua (Jesus) Messiah.” –1 Peter 3:17-21 In the context of Peter’s letter, the community of believers is being encouraged to share their faith with anyone who asks, and not to shy away from suffering if that is what God’s will entails. Peter then offers Yeshua as an example of One Who suffered and shared His message in the Spirit of God. It is explained that Yeshua’s suffering puts to death the sinful practices of the flesh and resurrects each believer in the life giving Spirit of God. It is by this same Spirit that the resurrected Messiah (not in Sheol) transcends time and space, and thus traverses time and space by the Spirit, to proclaim His saving work to those spirits of human beings who were still living in the flesh at the time of Noah prior to the flood. The text explains that during the time of Noah only eight imprisoned spirits heard Yeshua’s message received it and were delivered through the figurative tevilah immersion (baptism) of the flood, which the author shows to be a prefigure of the same tevilah immersion (baptism) that believers in Messiah have received unto salvation. From the p’shat (plain) meaning of the text and the subsequent, remez (hint), drash (comparative) and sod (mystery), we see that it does not place Yeshua in Sheol in relation to His proclamation but shows that it is by the Spirit of God following His resurrection that He spoke to the imprisoned spirits of humanity past. This text is not teaching anything even remotely to do with communicating with imprisoned dead people or angelic spirits. To the contrary, it simply teaches that God is just and that all humanity from Adam to the end of days has and will have an opportunity to either reject or receive the message of Messiah. This text shows how in the Spirit (of God), the resurrected Messiah transcends time and space and manifests the supernatural reality that He was both literally and figuratively slain before the foundation of the world (Revelation 13:8). 2 Corinthians 12:1-5 Boasting is necessary, though it is not beneficial; but I will go on to visions and revelations [a]of the Lord. 2 I know a man in Christ, who fourteen years ago—whether in the body I do not know, or out of the body I do not know, God knows—such a man was caught up to the third heaven. 3 And I know how such a man—whether in the body or apart from the body I do not know, God knows— 4 was caught up into Paradise and heard inexpressible words, which a man is not permitted to speak. -2 Corinthians 12:1-4 NASB V.1 Boasting is necessary, though it is not beneficial; but I will go on to visions and revelations [a]of the Lord. What Rav Shaul (Paul) is about to speak of is a “vision”, a “revelation” and not a physical or metaphysical event. Therefore, based on the very nature of either a vision or a revelation, the events described are already presumed unreal, not actual, neither physical nor metaphysical, but instead, something seen in the imagination, mind’s eye or spirit. V2. I know a man in Christ, who fourteen years ago—whether in the body I do not know, or out of the body I do not know, God knows—such a man was caught up to the third heaven. Rav Shaul is possibly speaking of himself in the guise of apologetic self-promoting rhetoric like that employed elsewhere in his works. Alternatively he is relaying the vision experience of a trusted fellow believer, perhaps one of his brothers among the Jewish Church fathers. He states clearly “whether in the body I don’t know, or out of the body I don’t know, God knows…” He is describing the experience of a vision. Those who experience visions have all kinds of feelings and sensory adventures but are not literally in the places they are visioning. Rav Shaul is not espousing “out of body experience”, which is an occult practice connected with Gnosticism, transcendental meditation and other false religious beliefs. To the contrary, Biblical Judaism abhors this idea viewing it as a form of witchcraft. Instead, Rav Shaul is alluding to the difference between experiencing a vision as if it were inside us verses experiencing a vision as if we are looking outwardly at it (both occurring within the mind’s eye or consciousness but neither occurring outside the body). In neither case does the spirit leave the body. Biblical Judaism teaches that the human soul (Body, mind, spirit etc.) is a unity unseparated until death when the spirit leaves and goes to Sheol. The Greek harpaso is poorly translated here by the NASB. In the context of this vision it means “caught away” and not caught up. Rav Shaul is right to give the interpretation to God, saying “God Knows”. Yes, God does know, in fact, so as to avoid confusion God has authored His word to say, “No one has ascended into heaven, except He who descended from heaven: the Son of Man.” (John 3:13), and “it is appointed for people to die once, and after this, the judgment…” (Heb. 9:27). V.3 And I know how such a man—whether in the body or apart from the body I do not know, God knows..” He repeats, “whether in the body I don’t know, or out of the body I don’t know, God knows…” because he is bewildered by the vision experience he is referring to and rightly understands that it was not a tangible, literal experience. Neither a physical or metaphysical reality. In Biblical Hebrew thought and interpretation something repeated is firmly established. Therefore, Rav Shaul has firmly established that he doesn’t know where the “man” was. As explained, the Scripture tells us where he was not. V.4 was caught up into Paradise and heard inexpressible words, which a man is not permitted to speak. The Greek harpaso is again poorly translated here by the NASB. In the context of this vision it means “caught away” and not caught up. We know this because the Jewish writer refers to paradise (Gan Eden, the Bosom of Abraham), which is a part of Sheol, meaning that the qualification of heaven, written as “third heaven” refers to the convergent presence of the Messiah in both the heavens and paradise simultaneously, following His resurrection. Following His resurrection the King Messiah being unbound by time, space, situational and locational being etc. In short, regardless of the issue of traversing the heavens as believers, this text is referring to a convergent form of paradise (in Sheol) and not to the heaven of heavens. Therefore, the text of 2 Corinthians 12:1-4 does not teach that a person (perhaps Paul) ascended to the heaven of heavens, something that would contradict the words of Yeshua and the teaching of Hebrews 9:27. Regarding the Resurrections of Lazarus, the Son of the widow of Nain etc. All (those temporally resurrected) had not yet passed into Sheol but were in transition sleep. Meaning unconscious but the spirit had not left the body according to ancient Jewish tradition (3 to 4 day period of unconscious sleep, the first stage of death/passing). This means that the person cannot communicate with the living, nor are they yet in Sheol (When Yeshua says "Today you will be with me in paradise" to the thief on the cross (Luke 23:43) I believe the word "today" is used in an eternally present sense. Alternatively, some pass over more quickly than others, although with regard to time and space how could we even begin to determine the measure by which we could access such a process?) In all these cases of temporal resurrections (they are exceptions, and include Elijah raising the woman's son) the resurrected are resurrected within four days of death, and their spirits have not entered death finally with regard to entering Sheol. "Appointed unto man once to die" regards the spirit's entry into Sheol and not the transition period of soul sleep (a euphemism used by Yeshua [John 11:11]). No one in transition sleep (first stage of separation) can communicate to the living. Therefore, the point I made regarding ghosts being demons remains the same, ghosts are not wandering human spirits. Additionally, Hebrews 9:27 makes both Karma and Reincarnation untenable concepts: Hebrews 9:27 of course also refutes the false beliefs of karma and reincarnation. Those who claim “sowing and reaping” to be the same concept as “karma” do so by ignoring the Scriptures that qualify sowing and reaping. Sowing and reaping applies to the temporal actions and outcomes of this life and to the cumulative actions of this life and their eternal outcome following judgement. It does not seek to solve the problem of injustice by perpetuating injustice, as is the case with karma and reincarnation. Karma attempts to provide a solution for evil by offering a cycle of lives that provide an opportunity to act rightly in order to become perfect, divine. The flaw in this delusion is that an inherently sinful person can never act perfectly, not in any life, nor can an evil act which has already been done, be undone by a good act. Ample evidence against the delusion of karma is recorded throughout human history for all to see. What’s more, karma says that a suffering destitute person (of a lower class) should be left to suffer in order to perfect their karma for a better reincarnation, this in direct opposition to the teaching of Scripture, which admonishes us to help the destitute and suffering. There is no justice in karma. It offers nothing more than a perpetual prison of impossible restitution and the false promise of (counterfeit) divinity. Whereas the God of justice has made restitution on behalf of all who will receive His loving sacrifice through Yeshua, and promises eternal life in Him (the Divine One). 28 so Messiah also, having been offered once to bear, carry the sins of many, will appear a second time for salvation without reference to, separation from sin [ref. Num. 19:13], to those who look for, eagerly await Him. “Messiah also, having been offered once” Just as the life of a human being ends in death (of the body) once, so too the death of Messiah occurs once in order to carry upon Himself the sin and death of many, and produces eternal life as a result. “to carry the sins of many” This is a quote from Isaiah 53:12, and is part of a Messianic prophecy spanning Isaiah 52:13-53:12. It is also alluded to in Mark 10:45 and a different portion of it is quoted in Acts 8:32-35. Notice that Messiah carries the sins of many, not all. God Who is all-knowing seeing the end from the beginning, sent Messiah to atone for all who would receive Him. The sins of the willfully unrepentant remain unatoned and thus, they will suffer the just punishment for their sins eternally as the antithesis to eternal living (Hebrews 6:2; Daniel 12:2; Mark 9:44-48; John 5:29; Matthew 25:41, 46; 2 Thessalonians 1:9; Revelation 20:10). “will appear a second time for salvation without reference to, separation from sin [ref. Num. 19:13],” His second coming does not address the issue of sin, which has already been solved in His death and resurrection. Rather His second coming brings the fullness of the promise of eternal life made manifest in the new heavens and new earth for all who have received Him and been reconciled to God in right relationship. That Messiah will return is certain (Mark 13:24-27; 2 Timothy 4:8; Titus 2:13; 1 Thessalonians 4:13-17). “to those who look for, eagerly await Him.” With regard to the first century Jewish believers who are the recipients of this work, they are to await Yeshua just as the people of Israel awaited the return of the high priest from the holy of holies on Yom Kippur. The distinction of “those who look for and eagerly await Him” is important. The writer has already addressed the issue of disobedience and those Israelites who failed to enter God’s rest (Heb. 4), now he gives a gentle reminder to his hearers, admonishing them to remain focussed on Yeshua and His promised return. Rav Shaul teaches rightly that not all ethnic-religious Jews are truly Jewish in soul, that is, not all ethnic-religious Jews have chosen to receive Yeshua’s redemptive work (Romans 9:6). Rav Shaul’s writing on this matter specifically refers to Jews (ethnic) and does not refer to the spiritual condition of non-Jews (as some foolishly misinterpret). As I’ve said on many occasions, the context of Romans 9 relates to Jews who are Messiah followers (true Israelites), and Jews who are ethnically Israel but are not Messiah followers. All examples given in Romans 9 relate to Jews, Gentiles are not mentioned in relation to the inward spiritual condition of a Jew. Therefore, it is utter nonsense for a Gentile to call himself a “spiritual Jew”. The only “Spiritual Jew” is an “ethnic Jew”, given that “Jew”, and “Israel” are ethnic nouns describing the descendants of Jacob (they are never used in Scripture to describe Gentiles, physically, spiritually or otherwise). As I have said many times, a Gentile calling himself a “Spiritual Jew” is comparable to a Briton calling himself a “Spiritual Navajo”. The same applies to a Church that claims to be Spiritual Israel. That Church is apostate. By way of Hebrews 9:28 being applied as a universal principle, applicable to all who truly believe: as disciples of Yeshua our faith is an ongoing walk of looking to Him, hoping in Him, eagerly awaiting Him. He is present and returning, and in Him we have returned to the eternal present. Copyright 2021 Yaakov Brown Messiah has appeared within time and space to Israel as the transcendent High Priest of a more perfect Sanctuary (the heavenly original Mishkan) and of the good things having already come that are yet to be fully arrived. Introduction:
There are numerous doctrinal ideas and spiritual principals alluded to in this chapter that apply to all believers regardless of ethnicity. However, it is important to continue to remember that the recipients of this work are first century Jewish believers and not Gentile believers. Therefore, words and phrases like “covenant, called, elect, eternal land” etc. are ethno-religious phrases that have a certain meaning to Torah observant Jews and in particular first century Jews. For both the ancient and modern Gentile reader there are fewer obstacles in the way of understanding the eternal atonement of Yeshua because for the most part the Gentile audience does not understand the temporal (present age) sacrificial system of Torah as a primary, even intrinsic part of cultural religious practice (of course this is now also true of rabbinical Judaism to some extent). The first century C.E. Messiah following Jew on the other hand is wrestling with how the then functional temple cult converges with a belief that Yeshua is the singular ultimate sacrifice Who fulfills and is the goal of all the sacrificial requirements of Torah, to the point of revealing the heavenly Tent of Meeting (Mishkan) and the origin of the redemptive work of God. To view this text only through the revisionist lens of universal application is to misunderstand it. With this in mind we must be intentional in seeking to understand how the Jewish recipients of this work in the first century C.E. are viewing this teaching and what it might have meant for them by way of application (halakhah). The Book to the Hebrews 9:1-10:18 explains that the new covenant is of eternal effect and is better than the former covenant of the Mosaic Torah because Yeshua the Great High Priest offers His eternal Spirit infused blood before the face of God in the original Holy of holies of the heavenly realm, thus, He atones once for all who will receive Him and need not offer sacrifices for Himself and others daily because He remains without sin, having died to secure the covenant and having been raised to life everlasting in order to apply it to all who believe. Therefore, Yeshua gives access to the heavenly Holy of holies to all who believe. NB: The section of the Talmud Bavliy called Seder Kodashiym (Order of Holies) addresses the many aspects of the Mosaic sacrificial system and the daily Temple practices of the first century C.E. as a reflection of Mishnaic Law. As is the case with all Scripture (scrolls of the original texts), there are no chapter breaks or verse markers (or punctuation for that matter) in the scroll of the Book to the Hebrews. It’s important to see the text of this chapter as a continuation of the previous chapter, the last verses of chapter 8 being: 12 For I will be merciful, forgiving toward their unrighteousness, iniquity, perversion, And their sins [missing the mark set by God’s holiness], and their iniquities, perversions I will no longer bring to mind, perpetually.” [Jeremiah 31:31-34 LXX] 13 When He said, “new covenant,” He has indicated that the first is old, decaying. Now whatever is decaying and growing old is about to disappear, be destroyed. BOOK TO THE HEBREWS Chapter 9:1-14 (Author’s translation) 1Now truly, indeed, the first covenant had regulations, judgements, righteousness for divine service and the earthly sanctuary, [a holy place in the land]. 2 For the first tent of meeting was prepared, built, ordained in which was the menorah[H] and, the table, and the exposed bread, bread before the face; this is called the Holy Place. 3 And after the second curtain there was a habitation which is called the Holy of holies alt. The Hebrew text reads, “and from the house to behind the second parochet (curtain) of the mishkan, is called holy of the holies [umibeiyt laparochet hasheiniyt mishkan hanikra kodesh hakadoshiym]. 4 having a golden censer of incense and the ark of the covenant covered on all sides with gold, in which was a golden pot holding the mãn[H] [What is it?], Aaron’s rod which budded, and the tablets of the covenant; 5 and over it the cherubiym of glory overshadowing the mercy seat, atoning cover; but about these things we can’t now speak in intricate detail. 6 Now when these things are (present tense) prepared, built, ordained the priests are (present tense) continually entering the first section of the sanctuary, performing the divine service, 7 but into the second [behind the parochet into the holy of holies], only the high priest enters once a year, not without taking blood which he offers for his soul and for the errors of the people committed in ignorance. 8 The Holy Spirit in this is showing, that the way into the holiest place of all was not yet revealed, appeared, manifest while the first sanctuary was still standing [referring to the Mishkan (Tent of meeting) constructed by Moses in the desert.], 9 which is a figure, parable, symbol for the present time. Accordingly both gifts and sacrifices are (presently) offered which cannot perfect, make whole the moral condition, conscience, heart, core being, inner person of those serving, worshipping, 10 since they are only food, drink, and various washings/immersions, and carnal, flesh, bodily regulations, judgements, ordinances imposed, laid out until a time of reforming.11 But when Messiah appeared as a high priest of the good things having come, He entered through the greater and more perfect, full, excellent Sanctuary, not made by human hands, because it is not of this creation; 12 and not through the blood of goats and calves, but through the blood of His own soul, He entered the holiest place once for all time, having obtained eternal redemption. 13 For if the blood of goats and bulls, and the ashes of a heifer sprinkled on those who have become defiled, unclean, sanctify as a means of purifying, cleansing the carnal form, flesh, body, 14 how much more will the blood of the Messiah, Who through the eternal Spirit offered, presented, sacrificed His soul without blemish, mark, spot to God; purge, cleanse, purify your conscience, moral consciousness, heart, core being, inner person from dead, necrotic works, deeds, doing, in order to serve the living God? HEBREWS 9:1-14 (line upon line) 1Now truly, indeed, (men[G], b’emet[H]) the first (protos[G], harishonah[H]) covenant (habriyt[H]) had regulations, judgements, righteousness (dikaiōma[G], hayu diyneiy[H]) for divine service (avodah[H], latreia[G]) and the earthly sanctuary, [a holy place in the land] (kosmikos hagion[G], umikdash ba’aretz[H]). 2 For the first (protos[G]) tent of meeting (skēnē[G], Mishkan[H]) was prepared, built, ordained (kataskeuazō[G]) in which was the menorah[H] (luchnia[G]) and, the table (trapeza[G], shulkhan[H]), and the exposed bread, bread before the face (prothesis artos[G], lechem hapaniym[H] alt. uma’arechet halechem[H]); this is called the Holy Place (hagion[G], kodesh[H]). 3 And after (meta[G]) the second (deuteros[G]) curtain (katapetasma[G]) there was a habitation (skēnē[G]) which is called the Holy of holies (hagion hagion[G]) alt. The Hebrew text reads, “and from the house to behind the second parochet (curtain) of the mishkan, is called holy of the holies [umibeiyt laparochet hasheiniyt mishkan hanikra kodesh hakadoshiym]. 1Now truly, indeed, the first covenant had regulations, judgements, righteousness for divine service and the earthly sanctuary, [a holy place in the land]. Having already been told that the earthly sanctuary was a copy of the original heavenly Sanctuary, it is now pointed out that the covenant connected to that same earthly replica had certain regulations that were carefully followed out of holy awe for the God Who commanded them through Moses His servant. We are also told that the purpose of these regulations was to direct Israel, through her priests, in “Divine service”. 2 For the first tent of meeting was prepared, built, ordained in which was the menorah[H] and, the table, and the exposed bread, bread before the face; this is called the Holy Place. By way of pretext, both the Mishkan (Tent of Meeting) and the Mikdash/Heiykhal (Temple) consisted of an outer court (which is not mentioned in this passage), a holy place, and the Holy of holies (Exodus 25-31, 35-40). Mishkan (Tent of meeting) being related to both shakhen (neighbour) and Sh'khinah (Talmudic Hebrew describing the manifest feminine presence of God [related to Hak’vod HaShem, the manifest Glory of God)]). Mikdash (Temple) is used in Exodus 25:8 to describe the Mishkan and is therefore synonymous with both the Mishkan and the later temples. Etymologically it is a composite word made up of “mi” (from) and “kadash” (sanctify), thus, from God comes the means of sanctification through blood atonement which makes reconciliation to and permanent dwelling (right relationship) with God possible. Heiykhal (Temple) is the most commonly used noun for the temple and can mean, “temple, palace, hall, sanctuary” etc. It is thought to be derived from the root yakol meaning, “to prevail, overcome, endure, have strength”. Thus, we overcome in God (the meaning of the ethnic noun Israel). The Holy Place: The articles described here were all situated in the holy place of the Tent of Meeting and were still in use in the holy place of the second temple at the time of the writing of this Book to the Hebrews (though at the time of the second temple they were replicas of the original articles). Menorah – (7 branched golden lampstand) The Menorah is described in detail in Exodus 25:31-40. It stood on the south side of the holy place (Exodus 40:24), and was kept burning day and night. The Talmud Bavliy Menachot 28b, a tractate of Seder Kadoshiym states that the menorah stood 18 handbreadths/palm widths (three common cubits) high, or approximately 1.62 metres (5.3 ft). Menorah is probably derived from the words nir (flame, light), nahar (stream, river), nahara (light, daylight), thus, the composite form minhara meaning “Place of light river” becomes menorah. The symbolism of the menorah is almost uncontainable, and considering the God it points to, not surprisingly so. Being a complex unity of seven connected branches, seven flames fed by pure olive oil and kept perpetually lit, the menorah (place of light river) is a representation of the manifest light presence of God, Hak’vod HaShem (Biblical Hebrew) or Shekhinah (Talmudic Hebrew). The oil used to fuel it is representative of the Ruach HaKodesh (Holy Spirit). Therefore, it is a symbol of the sevenfold attributes of God (Isaiah 6:1-5) and is also connected to the seven days of creation through the all existing light from which creation begins (Genesis 1). There are many other figurative meanings that are too prolific to note here. Shulkhan – (Table) The Table of the exposed bread stood on the north side of the holy place (Exodus 40:22) [approx. 0.8m H x 1m W x 0.5m D]. Shulkhan is from the root shalakh meaning “send, extend, direct, spread out” and with regard to shulkhan by implication, means to spread out a meal. The symbolism of the table is also rich. The essential meaning relating to its firm construction of Acacia wood is connected to the shoot of human offspring. Acacia wood is hardy and grows in the Sinai desert among other places. The gold covering symbolizing royalty, and ultimately deity. Thus, the table on which the bread before the face is placed can represent the King Messiah Yeshua, the root out of dry ground (Isa. 53:2) crowned in glory as Divine King (John 1:1; 10:30-33; 20:28, Rev. 1:8, Matt. 28:20; John 2:24-25; Phil. 2:6-11; 3:21). Messiah carries on His shoulders the hope and redemption of the twelve tribes of Israel, which are ever before the face of God. Lechem Hapaniym – (The Bread before the Face) The recipe and presentation of the showbread and its use is detailed in Leviticus 24:5-9. Two rows of six unleavened loaves (matzot) were placed side by side representing the twelve tribes of Israel. These loaves were to be eaten by the high priest Aaron and his sons. The loaves were made from ingredients offered to God by the tribes of Israel and were to sit exposed on the north side of the holy place and before the curtain of entry to the holy of holies. The loaves were placed at the beginning of each Shabbat. The incense censer was used to sprinkle incense on top of the bread before the face. The same incense was burned on the incense altar (Lev. 24:7; Num. 7:14). 3 And after the second curtain there was a habitation which is called the Holy of holies alt. The Hebrew text reads, “and from the house to behind the second parochet (curtain) of the mishkan, is called holy of the holies [umibeiyt laparochet hasheiniyt mishkan hanikra kodesh hakadoshiym]. The writer makes a clear distinction here between the holy place (v.2) and the holy of holies where the ark of the covenant once resided (v.3). The “second curtain” may refer to the Tent of Meeting having an entry curtain (first) and the second curtain parochet to the holy of holies. Alternatively, it may refer to the dual curtains before the holy of holies during the second temple period as attested to by the Mishnah and Talmud (Mishnah Shekaliym, c. 8. sect. 5. Maimonides on Hamikdash, c. 7. sect. 16: Talmud Bavliy Yoma, fol. 54. 1. & Ketubot, fol. 106. 1. Vid. Philo de Vita Mosis, l. 3. p. 667.) “he walked in the temple till he came between sh’neiy haparochot (the two vails), which divide between the holy, and holy of holies, and there was the space of a cubit between them.” - Mishnah Yoma, c. 5. sect. 1. 4 having a golden (chruseos[G], hazahav[H]) censer of incense (thumiastērion[G], mizbach[H]) and the ark (kibōtos[G], aron[H]) of the covenant (ho diathēkē[G], habriyt[H]) covered on all sides with gold (chruseos[G], zahav[H]), in which was a golden (chrusion[G], zahav[H]) pot (stamnos[G]) holding the mãn[H] [What is it?] (manna[G], haman[H]), Aaron’s (Aharon[H], mountainous, light bringer) rod (rhabdos[G], mateih[H]) which budded (blastanō[G], parach[H]), and the tablets (plax[G], veluchot[H]) of the covenant (ho diathēkē[G], habriyt[H]); 5 and over (huperanō[G]) it the cherubiym (cheroubim[G], cheruveiy[H] guardian, mighty-approacher, blessing bringer) of glory (doxa[G], hakavod[H]) overshadowing (kataskiazō[G]) the mercy seat, atoning cover (hilastērion[G], hakaporet[H]); but about these things we can’t now speak in intricate detail (kata meros[G]). 4 having a golden censer of incense and the ark of the covenant covered on all sides with gold, in which was a golden pot holding the mãn[H] [What is it?], Aaron’s rod which budded, and the tablets of the covenant; The items mentioned here all relate to the holy of holies, and all but the censer reside within the holy of holies. “Golden Censer of incense” The word “altar” is not in the Greek (oldest) text. There is good reason for this, the writer is about to thematically connect the offering of the incense on Yom Kippur when the incense is taken beyond the parochet (curtain) and into the holy of holies, to the fragrant path of Yeshua’s entry into the Holiest place in the heavenlies. Therefore, because the writer is describing items that have their place inside the holy of holies (the incense altar being outside the holy of holies in the holy place) he thus speaks of the censer that carries the incense from the incense altar into the holy of holies once a year and for that reason does not name the incense altar itself. Once again the gold of the incense censer denotes royalty and glory. While the Torah does not stipulate that this censer be golden (Lev. 16:12-14), the first century Jewish historian Josephus does (Antiquities. l. 3. c. 8. sect. 3.) and the Mishnah (Yoma, c. 4. sect. 4.) tells us that there were various censers used by the priests in the daily service, but the one being described here was unique and was used by the high priest on Yom Kippur (the day of atonement). The high priest used a silver censer on other occasions, but on the Yom Kippur (the day of atonement) he used this specific golden one, and with it he entered into the holy of holies. Revelation 8:3 affirms that the heavenly censer replicated in the earthly temple service is in fact golden. “The Ark of the covenant” The ark is so named because it contains the two tablets of the covenant [ten commandments] (Exodus 16:33-34; 25:10-16; Num. 10:33; 17:8-10). It was housed inside the holy of holies (Exodus 40:21). NB: Exodus 25 says “It is to be 21⁄2 cubits in length, 1 1⁄2 in breadth, and 1 1⁄2 in height (approximately 131×79×79 cm or 52×31×31 in).” A relatively small rectangular box. The ark was symbolic of the throne and manifest presence of God and is therefore the holiest of the articles of the service within the Tent of Meeting/Temple. The Mishkan was erected to house the ark and not the other way around. The ark was the first article constructed after God instructed Moses to build the Tent of Meeting (Exodus 25:8-10). The manifest glory of God dwelt between the cherubiym atop the mercy seat in the form of a cloud by day and a pillar of fire by night, the cloud being the daylight expression of the fire’s effect and the fire being more visible at night (Exodus 40:34-38; Psalm 80:1). The ark was known by several names: a. Numbers 10:33 calls it Aron Habriyt (Ark of the covenant) due to the tablets of the covenant residing within as a warning against sin. b. Exodus 25:22 calls it Aron Edut (Ark of the testimony), edut being from the root ed (witness). In other words, the ark of the testimony of the witness. c. 1 Samuel 3:3 calls it Aron Elohiym (Ark of God), denoting God as Judge and the contents of the Ark as an indictment against sin. d. 1 Kings 2:26 calls it Aron Adonay YHVH (Ark of the Lord YHVH Mercy), denoting its symbolic representation of God’s Kingship and His mercy. e. 2 Chronicles 35:3 calls it Aron HaKodesh (The Holy Ark), denoting God’s holiness and invoking awe. It is this name that our rabbis adopted in reference to the ark that houses the Torah situated behind a parochet (curtain) at the front or centre of the modern synagogue beneath the nir tamid (perpetual flame/light) which symbolises the ancient menorah. f. Psalms 132:8 calls it Aron uzachei (Ark of Your Strength), denoting the redemptive immutable strength of God. Our rabbis made this phrase part of the Torah service. As we return the Torah to the ark we say, “When the ark rested Moshe would say ‘Return O Lord to the host of Israel’s families. Arise O Lord to Your resting place, you and Aron uzachei the ark of Your strength…’” When the Mishkan was erected in the desert the Aron Habriyt ark of the covenant was housed in the holy of holies which was beyond the parochet (curtain) of entry seen from the holy place. It is worth noting that following the inauguration of Solomon’s temple the ark of the covenant is not heard of again in Scripture. Numerous Jewish commentators and sources affirm this (Talmud Bavliy Menachot, fol. 27. 2. & Yoma, fol. 21. 2. Menasseh ben Israel Koncil. in Gen. qu. 41. Kimkhi in Hagg. i. 8.). The location of the ark of the covenant is unknown, and there is little agreement among Jewish commentators on who took it, when, and where it now resides. some say, it was carried away by Nebuchadnezzar into Babylon, as one of the beautiful vessels of the house of the Lord, 2 Chronicles 36:10 (Talmud Bavliy Yoma, fol. 53. 2. Seder Olam Rabba, c. 25. T. Hieros. Shekalim, fol. 49. 3.) others, that Jeremiah the prophet took it and hid it in a cave on Mount Nebo (Joseph ben Gorion, l. 1. c. 17. 2 Maccabees. ii. 4, 5. ). The most common supposition is that it was hidden by King Josiah in some unknown deep place, which king Solomon had built for that purpose underground, knowing, that the temple would be destroyed (T. Hieros. Sota, fol. 22. 3. T. Bab. Ceritot, fol. 5. 2. Maimon. Beth Habbechira, c. 4. sect. 1.); numerous Jewish commentators claim that it was hidden under the pavement of a room in the temple, called "the wood room" (Mishnah Shekaliym, c. 6. sect. 1, 2. T. Hieros. Shekaliym, fol. 49. 3. Talmud Bavliy Yoma, fol. 54. 1.). Many have proposed theories on where the ark now resides. From Jerusalem beneath the temple mount, or under mount Nebo, to Rome, Egypt, Scotland, Ethiopia and the list goes on. Many continue to search it out and develop new theories, allowing their lives to be enveloped by the need to discover it, and it may well be discovered or will at least be recreated for use in the third temple, regardless, as Messiah followers we must have a different focus, not earthbound but heavenly. In Messiah Yeshua we have come to understand that the ark of the covenant being an earthly replica of its heavenly counterpart, is no longer necessary. Therefore, foolishly chasing after the hidden location of the ark on earth is not only a waste of time but has also become a practice of idolatry among many, both Jewish and Christian. As followers of Messiah and readers of the inspired Scriptures we know where the true, original ark of the covenant resides: “Then the Temple of God in heaven was opened, and the Ark of His Covenant appeared in His Temple. And there were flashes of lightning and rumblings and clashes of thunder and an earthquake and heavy hail.” -Revelation 11:19 TLV In fact, at the time of Yeshua’s earthly ministry and therefore, prior to the destruction of the second temple during the time of the writing of the Book to the Hebrews, the holy of holies was empty. Ha-even (the foundation stone) exposed at the centre of floor of the holy of holies. Therefore, the blood sprinkled yearly by the high priests of Israel on Yom Kippur, was being sprinkled on “The Stone that the builders rejected” (Yeshua the King Messiah). The ark of the covenant, like the table of the bread before the face, was made of acacia wood signifying Messiah’s humanity and was covered inside and out with gold representing His sinless nature, eternal deity and Kingship. It is worth noting that just as the ark of the covenant was on earth (Exodus 16:33-34; 25:10-16), so too was Yeshua “the root from dry ground” (Isa. 53:2), and just as the ark of the covenant is now depicted in the heavens (Rev. 11:19), so too Yeshua is seated in the right hand of the Father God in the heavens. The contents of the Ark of the covenant: Some suggest a contradiction between Hebrews 9:4 and 1 Kings 8:9, but this is nonsense. Hebrews 9:4 records the original contents of the ark, while 1 Kings 8:9 records the contents of the ark at the time of Solomon’s temple, meaning that by that time the staff of Aaron had been removed, possibly during the time that the ark spent outside of Israel’s possession (1 Samuel 4 – 2 Samuel 7). “The golden pot containing manna” The manna contained in the pot was miraculous in the sense that it was a portion of the manna that if left for a day would be maggot ridden (except on the Shabbat) [Exodus 16:19-20, 22]. Therefore, this portion of manna which God commanded to be put inside the ark (Ex. 16:33) as a remembrance of His provision of food for the wandering Israelites, was like the manna that deteriorated, but not the same. This is just one of many figures pointing to the nature of Yeshua, Who said of Himself, “I am the manna from the heavens” (John 6:41-51). The Hebrew man (Exodus 16:15) transliterated into English as manna, is a contracted form of the phrase “Mah zeh?” (What is it)? This is because when the Israelites first saw it they were dumbfounded as to its nature and exclaimed “What is it?” For approximately a thousand years we Jews asked this question, and when the King Messiah Yeshua entered time and space born of a virgin, and came of age to teach, He spoke to us a teaching that effectively said, “You’ve been asking the wrong question, instead of asking ‘Mah zeh?’ (What is it)? you should be asking ‘Miy Hu’? (Who is He)?” Manna is also known by three other names: “lechem min-hashamayim (bread from the heavens)” (Ex. 16:4), “lechem abiyriym (bread of mighty ones/angels)” (Psalms. 78:25), and as described by the complaining Israelites “balechem hakelokel (bread that is light, swift, a trifle)” (Num. 21:5). The Manna prefigured Messiah in many ways: Rav Shaul (Paul) called it “spiritual food” (1 Cor. 10:3) because of its supernatural origin (Ex. 16:4). The whiteness of the manna denotes the purity of Messiah (Ex. 16:31; 1 Peter 1:19). The manna was placed inside the ark (Ex. 16:33) as a symbol of Messiah’s tomb and His coming before the throne of God on our behalf (Heb. 9:23-24). Messiah through His messenger announces that He has “hidden manna” to give to those who overcome in the community of first century Pergamum (Rev. 2:17) etc. “The rod of Aaron that had budded” The historical record of the budding of Aaron’s staff is found in Numbers 16-17. Korah, Dathan, and Abiram gathered 250 leaders from the twelve tribes in order to challenge the leadership of Moses and Aaron. God caused the ground to open up and swallow Korah and all who stood with him in rebellion against Moses and Aaron (leaders appointed by God) [Num. 16:32]. The 250 leaders who rebelled against Moses and Aaron were destroyed by God with fire/lightening from the heavens (Num. 16:35). The following day the people of Israel accused Moses of killing his fellow Israelites. God provided further proof of Aaron’s right to be high priest when He instructed Moses to gather a representative from each tribe to bring an almond rod with the his name engraved on the rod representing his tribe, Aaron’s name being engraved on the rod for the tribe of Leviy (Num. 17:3). The rod of the man God had chosen as high priest would blossom. All twelve rods were placed in the Mishkan before the “testimony” (ark of the covenant), the next morning Aaron’s rod had not only budded, it had blossomed and yielded almonds (Num. 17:8). Aaron’s rod was placed in the ark as a warning against rebellion and as evidence that God alone appoints the true high priests of Israel. The budding, blossoming, and fruiting of the rod of Aaron was a figure for the resurrection of the King Messiah and Great High Priest Yeshua. “The tablets of the covenant” These were the second set of two tablets of the covenant engraved by God on stone that Moses had hewn (Exodus 34:1). The first set had been hewn by God and engraved by His finger (Exodus 24:12), but had been broken by Moses upon his witnessing Israel’s idolatrous worship of the golden calf (Exodus 32:19). The second set of tablets were placed into the ark as a witness, a testimony (Deut. 10:2). When Moses had finished writing the Torah (not just the tablets but the 5 books of Moses) it was placed beside the ark as a witness (an indictment) against the rebellious children of Israel (Deut. 31:25-27). Talmudic scholars claim that the book/scroll of the Torah (the five books of Moses) was placed inside the ark (Baba Batra 14), but the Targum Yonatan states that it was placed in a box and kept at the right side of the ark. The Targum is consistent with Scripture, the Talmudic claim is not. The tablets too are figurative. Messiah the Living Word sent by God was broken for us. Like the second set of tablets Messiah is of the earth by his human lineage according to the line of David, and is seeded of the Holy Spirit as God with us, just as the tablets hewn from the earth were made a unity by the written word of the finger of God. Messiah was made under the Torah (Gal. 4:4). The Torah was within His inner being (heart) and He fulfilled the letter of the Torah concerning what was written about Him (Ps. 40:8; Heb. 10:7-9). He did not come to destroy the Torah but to fully fill it (Matt. 5:17). He bore the curse of the Torah by being made a curse for us (Gal. 3:13). “For Messiah is the goal of the Torah for righteousness to everyone who believes, trusts.” -Romans 10:4 (Author’s translation) 5 and over it the cherubiym of glory overshadowing the mercy seat, atoning cover; but about these things we can’t now speak in intricate detail. NB: Of the four cherubiym of Solomon’s Temple, two are fashioned into the lid of the ark of the covenant as guardians of the mercy seat and two are made to stand as guardians of the Inner Sanctuary [Holy of holies] (Exodus 25:18-22; 37:7-9; 1 Kings 6:23-28; 1 Chronicles 3:10-14). The Hebrew word cherub has no known root, however etymologists link its meaning to an Assyrian word used to name similar creatures, and theorize that the ancient Hebrew root probably had similar meaning. The best guess at its meaning is: mighty-approacher, or blessing bringer. Unlike certain other messengers of HaShem who sometimes appear in humanoid form, the cherubiym are always winged and have an appearance that mirrors specific animals, such as eagles and lions. It was between the two cherubiym atop the ark that the manifest glory of God appeared (Exodus 25:17-22; Lev. 16:2; Num. 7:89; Psalm 80:1). Several ancient Jewish commentators say that the two cherubiym atop the ark reflect the two cherubiym placed by God in the garden of Eden (Gen. 3:24) [Targum Yonatan &. Hieros. in Gen. iii. 24.). “the atoning cover” Kaporet (Num. 7:89) This was a slab of solid gold that fit precisely over the top of the ark (box). It was on this cover that the blood of the Yom Kippur sacrifice was sprinkled each year by the high priest (Lev. 16:14-15). “but about these things we can’t now speak in intricate detail.” The intricate details are not needed in order for the writer to properly convey the teaching of the Holy Spirit on the subject of Yeshua’s superiority to the earthly things. What’s more, the first century Jewish audience, at very least the devote among them, already knew the details concerning the temple service and the great significance of each article used in the practice of the priesthood. 6 Now when these things are (present tense) prepared, built, ordained (kataskeuazō[G]) the priests (ho hiereus[G], hakoheniym[H]) are (present tense) continually (diapantos[G]) entering the first section of the (protos[G]) sanctuary (skēnē[G], mishkan[H]), performing the divine service (avodah[H], latreia[G]), 7 but into the second (deuteros[G]) [behind the parochet into the holy of holies], only the high priest (archiereus[G], kohen hagadol[H]) enters once a year, not without taking blood (aima[G], dam[H]) which he offers (prospherō[G]) for his soul (nafsho[H]) and for the errors (agnoēma[G]) of the people (ho laos[G], ha’am[H]) committed in ignorance. 6 Now when these things are (present tense) prepared, built, ordained the priests are (present tense) continually entering the first section of the sanctuary, performing the divine service, The items mentioned in verse 2 already indicate the service associated with them. The duties of the kohaniym included keeping the menorah lit continually (Ex. 27:20-22; Lev. 24:1-4), placing fresh loaves before the face on the table of showbread (Lev. 24:5-9) and burning incense on the incense altar (Ex. 30:7-9), which is something Zechariah the father of Yochanan (John the Immerser) performed during his period of priestly service (Luke 1:9-11). These acts of priestly service “are” being performed at the time of the writing of this work. Therefore, the work was written prior to the destruction of the temple in 70 C.E. The writer makes a point of distinguishing the holy place (first section of the sanctuary/temple). He is combining the figures of Mishkan (tent of meeting) and Mikdash/Heiykhal (temple), and is making a clear distinction between the holy place and the holy of holies, both of which are part of the tent/temple. 7 but into the second [behind the parochet into the holy of holies], only the high priest enters once a year, not without taking blood which he offers for his soul and for the errors of the people committed in ignorance. The holy of holies is now referred to and the need for the Levitical high priest to offer the blood of animals, in particular, with regard to Yom Kippur (tenth day of the seventh [shabbat] month Tishrei), a bull and subsequently a goat (the goat for HaShem), thus offering blood for both himself and his household and then for the people of Israel (Lev. 16). This blood, like all atonement, covers sin repented of, therefore, committed in ignorance. Covering is not affected for the wilfully unrepentant. “For the life of the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it to you on the altar to make atonement for your souls; for it is the blood by reason of the life that makes atonement.” -Leviticus 17:11 NASB The writer confirms the ineffective service of the Levitical priesthood pertaining to its inability to provide eternal atonement, given that the high priest of the Levitical priesthood himself needs to be regularly atoned for. 8 The Holy Spirit (Hagios Pneuma[G], Ruach Hakodesh[H]) in this is showing (dēloō[G]), that the way (hodos[G], haderekh[H]) into the holiest place of all (ho hagion[G], el-hakodesh kol[H]) was not yet revealed, appeared, manifest (phaneroō[G]) while the first (protos[G]) sanctuary (skēnē[G], mishkan[H]) was still standing [referring to the then standing second Temple approx.. 60 C.E.], 9 which is a figure, parable, symbol (parabolē[G], mashal[H]) for the present time (lazman[H]). Accordingly both gifts (dōron[G], minatot[H]) and sacrifices (thusia[H], uzvachiym[H]) are (presently) offered which cannot perfect, make whole (teleioō[G], lehashliym[H]) the moral consciousness, conscience, heart, core being, inner person (suneidēsis[G], levav[H]) of those serving, worshipping (latreuō[G], haoveid[H]), 8 The Holy Spirit in this is showing, that the way into the holiest place of all was not yet revealed, appeared, manifest while the first sanctuary was still standing [referring to the Mishkan (Tent of meeting) constructed by Moses in the desert.], The Holy Spirit is linked to the spoken and written word of God as the wind of God’s voice, or the wind of His davar[H] (logos[G]), essence, word (Yeshua). The writer of the Book to the Hebrews refers to the Holy Spirit in a similar way in 3:7. “The holiest place of all” does not refer to the earthly holy of holies but alludes to the heavenly holy of holies yet to be manifest, as qualified by what follows (the Greek text does not repeat hagion [the Greek way of saying holy of holies] but reads ho hagion “the Holiest”, and the literal translation of the Hebrew reads “the holiest place of all”). In short the Holy Spirit is showing through the symbolism of the earthly Tent of Meeting/Temple system, that the holiest place of all in the heavens is yet to be fully manifest on earth, yet to be understood properly in relation to Messiah’s sacrificial death and the sprinkling of His blood on the heavenly mercy seat as an eternal atonement for all who receive Him, continually first for the Jew and also for the nations. The Holy Spirit is showing that while the Tent of Meeting was standing (and by inference the second temple) the way to the holiest place in the heavens had not yet been revealed but was symbolised in the earthly replica. The writer is building up to and explanation of the fullness of the revelation of Yeshua’s redemptive work in entering into the heavenly holiest (holy of holies). Something the writer has already alluded to (Heb. 4:14). This is also an allusion to the fact that it was only ever the high priest who could enter the earthly holy of holies and then once a year, but in Yeshua God would manifest the means by which all who believe are able to enter beyond the parochet (veil), not of the earthly holy of holies but that of the heavens, that holiest place that will come down with the new Jerusalem (a city which has no temple because God Himself and the Lamb are its temple [Rev. 21:22]). The way to the holiest place in the heavens has been revealed in Yeshua to those who believe by faith through grace, but the fullness of this revelation will come at the end of the age 9 which is a figure, parable, symbol for the present time. Accordingly both gifts and sacrifices are (presently) offered which cannot perfect, make whole the moral condition, conscience, heart, core being, inner person of those serving, worshipping, “which is a figure, parable, symbol for the present time” The temple (extension of the Mishkan) is (in approx. 60 C.E.) a present parable teaching the deeper truth of the original Mishkan in the heavens and the service of the King Messiah as the Great High Priest in redeeming all who will believe and giving them access to God in right relationship. It is again emphasised that the then functioning temple cult and its offerings and sacrifices were not able to purge and purify the inner person, in particular those priests (including the Levitical high priest, albeit at that time an apostate appointee) who were performing the rites. 10 since they are only food (brōma[G], habasar[H]), drink (poma[G], hama’acholot[H]), and various washings/immersions (baptismos[G], hateviylot[H]), and carnal, flesh, bodily (sarx[G]) regulations, judgements, ordinances (dikaiōma[G]) imposed, laid out (epikeimai[G]) until a time (kairos[G], ad-et[H]) of reforming (diorthōsis[G], hatikon[H]).11 But when Messiah (Christos[G], Mashiyach[H]) appeared as a high priest (archiereus[G], kohen gadol[H]) of the good things (agathos[G], latovah ha’atiydot[H]) having come, He entered through the greater (meizōn[G], bigdulah[H]) and more perfect, full, excellent (teleios[G], hameulleh[H]) Sanctuary (skene[G], hamishkan[H]), not made by human hands (cheiropoiētos[G], b’yad adam[H]), because it is not of this creation (ktisis[G], meihabriyah hazot[H]); 10 since they are only food, drink, and various washings/immersions, and carnal, flesh, bodily regulations, judgements, ordinances imposed, laid out until a time of reforming. The food and drink offered in various rites was just that, temporal fuel offered as part of a system that was passing away. With regard to immersions, washings etc. see my commentary on Hebrews 6:2. “bodily regulations, judgements, ordinances imposed, laid out until a time of reforming.” The writer explains according to the Holy Spirit, that all these regulations concerning the flesh, that is the decaying body of human beings and its outward ritual cleansing, are all symbols pointing to a time of reformation. That time having come in Messiah Yeshua and yet to be fully revealed in the world to come. The new covenant is the reforming of the first covenant. Notice “reform” and not “disregard”. The first covenant is to be regarded as a parable teaching the new covenant which is the original and transcendent perfection of that which the first covenant points to. 11 But when Messiah appeared as a high priest of the good things having come, He entered through the greater and more perfect, full, excellent Sanctuary, not made by human hands, because it is not of this creation; The writer has spoken extensively of the practicalities of the Mosaic covenant and sacrificial system and has exposed its inability to affect a purging of the soul. It is likely that his Jewish brothers and sisters, the recipients of this work, were still allowing the temple cult to occupy the larger portion of their faith focus, something that, if left unaddressed could lead to their turning away from true faith in the King Messiah Yeshua. Therefore, the writer shifts focus to Yeshua the Great High Priest of the original, transcendent, and eternal Sanctuary of God. Now Messiah is come and the way into the holiest place (heavenly holy of holies) is manifest, revealed (v.8). The Mishkan of the desert was at the time of this revelation, no longer functioning while the temple was functioning but soon to be destroyed. Messiah has appeared within time and space to Israel as the transcendent High Priest of a more perfect Sanctuary (the heavenly original Mishkan) and of the good things having already come that are yet to be fully arrived. He has opened to Israel and the nations the way to right relationship in God’s intimate person, an opportunity to dwell in Him eternally. This He did by sprinkling His everlasting blood upon the heavenly mercy seat of the heavenly Sanctuary, which is neither made by human hands nor subject to this creation, but exists perpetually within the all existing God of Israel YHVH. “48 However, the Most High does not dwell in houses made by human hands; as the prophet says: 49 ‘Heaven is My throne, And the earth is the footstool of My feet; What kind of house will you build for Me?’ says the Lord, ‘Or what place is there for My rest? 50 Was it not My hand that made all these things?’” -Acts 7:48-50 (Isaiah 66:1,2) NASB [Ref. Acts 17:24] 12 and not through the blood (aima[G], bedam[H]) of goats (tragos[G], se’iyriym[H]) and calves (moschos[G], va’agaliym[H]), but through the blood of His own soul (aima[G], bedam-nafsho[H]), He entered the holiest place (ho hagion[G], el-hakodesh[H]) once for all time, having obtained (heuriskō[G]) eternal redemption (geulat olam[H]). 13 For if the blood (aima[G], im-dam[H]) of goats (tragos[G], se’iyriym[H]) and bulls (tauros[G], hapariym[H]), and the ashes (spodos[G], eifer[H]) of a heifer (damalis[G], haparah[H]) sprinkled (rhantizō[G]) on those who have become defiled, unclean (koinoō[G], al-hatmei’iym[H]), sanctify (hagiazō[G], yekadoshiym[H]) as a means of purifying, cleansing (katharotēs[G], letaheir[H]) the carnal form, flesh, body (sarx[G], besa’ar[H]), 12 and not through the blood of goats and calves, but through the blood of His own soul, He entered the holiest place once for all time, having obtained eternal redemption. As has already been explained “both gifts and sacrifices are (presently) offered which cannot perfect, make whole the moral condition, conscience, heart, core being, inner person of those serving, worshipping,” (v.9). In particular the reference to “the blood of goats and calves” regards Yom Kippur (Lev. 16), when the Levitical high priest would enter behind the parochet into the holy of holies. Therefore, Yeshua offered the blood of His own soul. Yeshua’s blood (life) being that substance which is a convergence of deity and sinless human physiology. Put simply, His blood, like the covenant it inaugurated, is everlasting, and as a result its atonement is of eternal effect. The writer uses ho hagion[G] “the holiest place” for good reason. While he is likening the heavenly place Messiah entered to the earthly replica, he is none the less distinguishing the heavenly holy of holies as the “holiest”, so as not to confuse the two. Messiah did not enter the earthly holy of holies, he need not, the earthly holy of holies (first century C.E.) did not contain the ark or the mercy seat. Therefore, Yeshua entered the heavenly holy of holies, the original, the holiest place, and made atonement upon the heavenly mercy seat which is upon the heavenly ark in the heavenly Mishkan. Thus, as I have stated, the redemption He obtained for all who would receive Him is of eternal effect. The Targum Yonatan points us toward the redemptive work of God in Yeshua, saying: “Jacob said, when he saw Gideon the son of Joash, and Samson the son of Manoah, who should be redeemers; ‘not for the redemption of Gideon am I waiting, nor for the redemption of Samson am I looking, for their redemption is a temporal redemption; but for thy redemption am I waiting and looking, O Lord, because thy redemption is an everlasting redemption.’'' -Targum Yonatan Ben Uzziel (2nd Century C.E.) Genesis 49:18 13 For if the blood of goats and bulls, and the ashes of a heifer sprinkled on those who have become defiled, unclean, sanctify as a means of purifying, cleansing the carnal form, flesh, body, Once again the reference to “the blood of goats and bulls” regards Yom Kippur (Lev. 16), when the Levitical high priest would enter behind the parochet into the holy of holies. Only this time the use of the word “bull” specifically refers to the Levitical high priest’s need to sacrifice a bull for himself and his family, something Yeshua being sinless did not need to do. “and the ashes of a heifer sprinkled on those who have become defiled” The ashes of the heifer were used as a ritual cleansing of those who had become ceremonially unclean through contact with a dead body (Num. 19). As this verse rightly acknowledges, the sacrificial practices and the sprinkling of the water made from heifer ashes were not more than ritual cleansing of the physical body. None of these practices affected purity of the entire being. 14 how much more will the blood (aima[G], hadam[H]) of the Messiah (Christos[G], ha-Mashiyach[H]) Who through the eternal (aiōnios[G], olam[H]) Spirit (pneuma[G], beruach[H]) offered, presented, sacrificed (prospherō[G], hikriyv[H]) His soul (nafsho[H]) without blemish, mark, spot (amōmos[G], bivliy-mum[H]) to God (Theos[G], l’Elohiym[H]); purge, cleanse, purify (katharizō[G], yetaheir[H]) your conscience, moral consciousness, heart, core being, inner person (suneidēsis[G], et libchem[H]) from dead, necrotic (nekros[G], mavet[H]) works, deeds, doing (ergon[G], asiym[H]) in order to serve (latreuō[G], la’avod[H]) the living God (zaō Theos[G], et Elohiym chayiym[H])? 15 And through this (dia touto[G], zot[H]) He is the mediator, reconciler, go between, messenger advocate (mesitēs[G], malakh meiliytz[H]) of a new covenant (kainos diathēkē[G], labriyt hachadashah[H]), so that, by means of His death (Thanatos[G], umoto[H]) we are (nimtza[H]) found redeemed, atoned, purged (apolutrōsis[G], lechaparat[H]) of the violations (parabasis[G], haposhiym tachat[H]) that were committed under the first covenant (protos diathēkē[G], habriyt harishonah[H]), those who have been called (kaleō[G]) may receive (lambanō[G]) the promise (epaggelia[G], et-havtachat[H]) of the eternal (aiōnios[G], olam[H]) inheritance (klēronomia[G], nachalat[H]). [alt. Hebrew text translates as, “that the elect might receive the promised eternal land.”] 14 how much more will the blood of the Messiah, Who through the eternal Spirit offered, presented, sacrificed His soul without blemish, mark, spot to God, purge, cleanse, purify your conscience, moral consciousness, heart, core being, inner person from dead, necrotic works, deeds, doing in order to serve the living God? “How much more” is a kal vachomer (lenient and strict/lesser and greater) rabbinical form of teaching common to Talmudic literature and practiced for many centuries prior to the codification of the Talmud. This type of argument is similar but not the same as fortiori (a Latin word meaning “from the stronger”). Essentially the writer is saying, “if the temporary blood of the copy is able to ritually cleanse the body, how much more so the eternal blood of the Creator in Whom the original exists and from Whom the temporary signpost pointing to the original was gifted”. “without blemish” Sacrificial animals were required to be without blemish. In the case of Messiah this refers to His sinless life (Heb. 4:15). “the blood of the Messiah” As previously stated, Yeshua’s blood (life) being that substance which is a convergence of deity and sinless human physiology. Put simply, His blood, like the covenant it inaugurated, is everlasting, and as a result its atonement is of eternal effect. Therefore, He alone is able to purge us of “necrotic works/deeds”. We note the stark contrast between the delusional life of necrotic deeds and the authentic eternal life in Messiah. The wording is poignant. To live according to the sinful nature is like a man living with necrotizing fasciitis, a form of bacteria resistant to human medicine. Yeshua comes to that same man and offers to cleanse his entire being inside and out, and as a result the cause and the symptoms of the infection are removed entirely. What the human doctors (a poor replica of healing) cannot do, the Creator of humanity has already done. Copyright 2021 Yaakov Brown Those who make Torah the goal, miss the Goal of Torah (Ref. Rom. 10:4). Introduction:
By way of introduction, we must remind ourselves that the first century Messiah following Jewish recipients of this book continue to work out their faith in the shadow of the yet to be silenced temple and its decaying sacrificial system (the Book to the Hebrews being written prior to the destruction of the temple as evidenced by the present tense verbs used concerning the sacrificial practices of the Levites). At the time (approx. 60 C.E.) both the observant Messiah following Jews of the diaspora and those in the land (Roman occupied Israel) are yet to fully understand how Messiah has revealed the original heavenly temple, proving the earthly copy to be a passing picture of a greater atonement. The writer of the Book to the Hebrews, inspired by the Holy Spirit, uses the words of Jeremiah (31:31-34) to show that the Torah written on the hearts (inner being) of those redeemed by the New Covenant (a better covenant), is that part of Torah that is everlasting, while those parts of Torah concerning the temporal sacrificial system and the physical earthly tent of meeting are “decaying, becoming old, soon to disappear/be destroyed” (v.13). Becoming, meaning not yet obsolete. As we have already understood, the Torah remains as an indictment against sin until the end of the age, following which only the eternal parts of Torah remain. This is affirmed by the teaching of the King Messiah Yeshua. Those who manipulate or mis-qualify the meaning of nomos[G]/Torah[H] in the present chapter do so in a desperate attempt to hold on to those parts of Torah which the text clearly says are, “decaying, becoming old, soon to disappear/be destroyed”. In doing so they deceive themselves and their hearers, turning the gaze of Messiah followers away from Yeshua and toward the misuse of Torah, making the written Instruction an object of idolatry. Torah is good and the mitzvot (commandments) holy (Rom. 7:12), but the misuse of it is wickedness (Gal. 3:10-11). “So then, the Torah is holy, and the commandment is holy and righteous and good.” -Romans 7:12 TLV “For Messiah is the goal of the Torah, the means of righteousness for all who believe.” -Romans 10:4 (YBYP) “10 …all who rely on the works of Torah instruction are under a curse—for the Scriptures say, “Cursed is everyone who does not keep doing everything written in the scroll of the Torah.” 11 It is plain to see that no one is justified before God by Torah, for ‘the righteous shall live by faith, trust, belief.’” -Galatians 3:10-11 (Author’s translation) Those under curse seek to keep Torah, while those set free from curse in Messiah are kept by “the Torah of the Spirit of life in Messiah Yeshua.” The former covenant made weak by our sin, nonetheless points to the goal Yeshua and a better covenant that cannot be weakened by sin because the outworking of it is entirely reliant on Yeshua, Who was tempted and put on trial in every way that we are but remained sinless (Heb. 4:15), and Who, having conquered death is now seated in the right hand of God the Father ministering as our Great all existing, and everlasting High Priest. As is the case with all Scripture (scrolls of the original texts), there are no chapter breaks or verse markers (or punctuation for that matter) in the scroll of the Book to the Hebrews. It’s important to see the text of this chapter as a continuation of the previous chapter, the last verses of chapter 7 being: 27 Who does not need to offer sacrifices daily, like those high priests, first for His own sins [missing the mark set by God’s holiness] and then for the sins of the people, because He did this once for all when He offered up His soul. 28 For the Torah[H] appoints men as high priests who are infirm, weak, but the word, essence, substance of the oath, which came after the Torah[H], appoints a Son, who has been made consecrated forever. BOOK TO THE HEBREWS Chapter 8 (Author’s translation) 1 Now concerning the things we have spoken of this is the sum, the primary principal, goal: we have such a high priest, Who sits among, in, at the right hand of the throne of the Majesty, Royal Glory in the heavens, 2 a minister, servant in the sanctuary, holy of holies and in the true, original tent of meeting, which the Lord pitched, fastened together, not humanity, man, mankind, a man. 3 For every high priest individually and collectively, is appointed to offer gifts, both freewill offerings and sacrifices; so it is necessary that this one (Yeshua) also have something to bring, offer. 4 Now if He were on earth, in the land, He would not be a priest at all, since there are those who offer the gifts according to the Torah; 5 who serve an imitation, copy, pattern, warning and shadow, shade of the heavenly things, just as Moshe[H] (drawn out one, resurrected one) was warned when he was about to make the Tent of Meeting; for, “See, heed, perceive,” He says, “that you make all things, individually and collectively by the pattern, shape, print, manner, fashion, figure which was shown to you on the mountain.” [Exodus 25:40] 6 Yet now He has obtained a more excellent ministry, service to the extent that He is also the mediator, go between, reconciler of a better covenant, which has been enacted, made law, established on better promises. 7 For if that first covenant had been free of grounds for fault, defect, blame no place would have been sought for a second. 8 For in finding fault with the people, He says, “Behold, now, pay attention days are coming, says the Lord, When I will bring about, make, fully fill, bring to its goal a new covenant With the house of Yisrael[H] and the house of Y’hudah[H], [Jeremiah 31:31] 9 Not like, according to the covenant which I made with their fathers on the day I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; For they did not continue in My covenant, And I did not regard them [alt. Hebrew Masoretic text reads “I was their Husband”], says the Lord. [Jeremiah 31:32] 10 For this is the covenant which I will make with the house of Yisrael[H] (overcomes in God) After those days, declares the Lord: I will put My instructions into their minds, understanding, inward parts, And write, inscribe them on their hearts, core being, inner person. And I will be their God, And they shall be to Me a people. [Jeremiah 31:33] 11 And they will not teach, each one his neighbour, And each one his brother, saying, ‘Know, understand, learn, comprehend the Lord,’ For they will all, individually and collectively know, see, perceive Me, From the least to the greatest of them. [Jeremiah 31:34a] 12 For I will be merciful, forgiving toward their unrighteousness, iniquity, perversion, And their sins [missing the mark set by God’s holiness], and their iniquities, perversions I will no longer bring to mind, perpetually.” [Jeremiah 31:31-34 LXX] 13 When He said, “new covenant,” He has indicated that the first is old, decaying. Now whatever is decaying and growing old is about to disappear, be destroyed. HEBREWS 8 (line upon line) 1 Now (de[G]) concerning the things we have spoken (lego[G]) of (epi[G]) this is the sum, the primary principal, goal (kephalaion[G], sof davar hakol nishma[H]): we have (echo[G], yesh lanu[H]) such a high priest (archiereus[G], Kohen gadol[H]), Who sits (kathizō[G]) among, in, at (en[G]) the right (dexios[G], hakavod[H]) hand of the throne (thronos[G]) of the Majesty, Royal Glory (megalōsunē[G], hag’dulah[H]) in the heavens (ho ouranos[G], bashamayiym[H]), 2 a minister, servant (leitourgos[G], meshareit[H]) in the sanctuary, holy of holies (hagion[G], bakodesh[H]) and in the true, original (alēthinos[G], emet[H]) tent of meeting (skēnē[G], uv’mishkan[H]), which the Lord (Ho Kurios[G], YHVH[H]) pitched, fastened together (pēgnumi[G]), not (ou[G], ve’lo[H]) humanity, man, mankind, a man (anthrōpos[G], adam[H]). 1 Now concerning the things we have spoken of this is the sum, the primary principal, goal: we have such a high priest, Who sits among, in, at the right hand of the throne of the Majesty, Royal Glory in the heavens, “Now concerning the things we have spoken of this is the goal” This refers to all the former things alluded to including Yeshua’s superiority to Moses, the Torah, the Levitical priesthood, and Melkiy Tzedek. All of the temporary things that have been expounded on are signs pointing to the goal (Rom. 10:4). “we have such a high priest, Who sits among, in, at the right hand of the throne of the Majesty, in the heavens” The Hebrew euphemism “hag’dulah[H]” describes YHVH. (Psalms 110:1; Heb. 1:3, 13; 10:11-14). There are many thrones (Col. 1:16), but only one “throne of the Majesty”. The book of the Acts of the Shlichiym (Sent Ones, Apostles) records Yeshua standing at the right hand of God at the point of the Jewish martyr Stephen’s death (Acts 7:55-56). This does not mean that Yeshua is always standing (positionally speaking), rather it indicates His continued concern for and participation in the lives of His followers. Yeshua understood Stephen’s faithfulness unto death, stood to honour Stephen and subsequently (transcendently) met Stephen in Gan Eden (the bosom of Abraham/Paradise). The resurrected King Messiah is transcendent and unbound by time and space, everlasting just as He was from the beginning. 2 a minister, servant in the sanctuary, holy of holies and in the true, original tent of meeting, which the Lord pitched, fastened together, not humanity, man, mankind, a man. “a minister, servant in the sanctuary, holy of holies” The Greek text uses the plural form for “holy” and thus, conveys the heavenly holy of holies that is the original for the temporary shadow of the earthly holy of holies into which the Levitical high priest would enter once a year during Yom Kippur (the Day of Atonement). “in the true, original tent of meeting,” The Mishkan (Tent of Meeting) which Moses was instructed to erect (Exodus 25-31, 35-39), was a copy of the true, authentic, original heavenly Mishkan. Therefore, for the Messiah following Jew of the first century to place his focus on the temporary copy (at that time being the second temple, still in use) is for him to miss the point of that sanctuary (holy signpost) entirely. The Messiah follower is admonished to look to Yeshua and the heavenly Mishkan (Rev. 15:5) which the earthly sanctuary points to. Some seven hundred years prior Isaiah the prophet had a vision of the heavenly temple and prophesied it to Israel (Isaiah 6). Sadly, the orthodox Jewish focus on rebuilding the temple today, though in line with fulfilment of prophecy regarding the latter days, is nonetheless a practice of focusing on that which is passing away. Either knowingly or unwittingly those Jews today who place their hope in the re-establishment of the temple and sacrificial practices, are in fact hoping in vain. Messiah Yeshua is the means of our redemption and not the temporary blood of animals which were always a sign of the greater atonement of HaShem in Messiah. “For by one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy.” -Hebrews 10:14 NIV “which the Lord pitched, fastened together, not humanity.” The temporary Mishkan erected in the desert long before there was a temple in Jerusalem, was a visual and kinetic reminder of God’s desire to dwell with His people in perpetuity. Mishkan (Tent of meeting) being related to both shakhen (neighbour) and Sh'khinah (Talmudic Hebrew describing the manifest feminine presence of God [related to Hak’vod HaShem, the manifest Glory of God)])," The emphasis here is on the fact that God is the One Who has created and established all things, and He alone is able to save. It is God Who pitched the heavenly Mishkan and God Who instructed Moses to build a copy as a sign pointing to it and its redemptive purpose. Human beings cannot claim to have constructed the holy place, nor can any human being claim to have the ability to save himself. This is especially important when addressing those first century Jewish followers of Yeshua who were returning their focus to the keeping of Torah (Instruction) rather than focusing on Yeshua the King Messiah and allowing God’s Spirit to outwork the Torah (Instruction) of Yeshua in them. While this is addressed to the Messiah following Jews of the first century, it is nonetheless a teaching applicable to all who believe. The Gospel imperative is self-evident. It is God Who saves through Yeshua and not human beings who save themselves. We receive Yeshua’s finished work and in doing so we acknowledge that our salvation is entirely reliant upon Him. Any gospel that teaches good works as the means of either faith or salvation is in direct contradiction to the Scriptures which teach that good works are the fruit of faith (being in Him precedes doing of Him). “7 in order that in the coming ages He might show the incomparable riches of His grace, practical love, unmerited favour, expressed in His kindness to us in Messiah Yeshua. 8 For it is by grace, practical love, unmerited favour, that you have been saved, through faith, trust, belief—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God— 9 not by works, so that no one can boast.” -Ephessians 2:7-9 (Author’s translation) 3 For every (pas[G]) high priest (archiereus[G], Kohen gadol[H]) individually and collectively, is appointed (kathistēmi[G]) to offer gifts, both freewill offerings (dōron[G]) and sacrifices (thusia[G]); so it is necessary that this one (Yeshua) also have something to bring, offer (prospherō[G]). 4 Now if He were on earth, in the land (epi ge[G], ba’aretz[H]), He would not be a priest (hiereus[G], kohein[H]) at all, since there are those who offer the gifts according to the Torah (ho nomos[G]); 3 For every high priest individually and collectively, is appointed to offer gifts, both freewill offerings and sacrifices; so it is necessary that this one (Yeshua) also have something to bring, offer. Those who claim that “Torah[H]” or “nomos[G]” in and of itself, simply means the specific instructions given to the priests must explain why the text reads “ho nomos[G]” (The Torah), “katorah[H]” (because of, according to The Torah). The instruction the priests follow is part of the Torah. Therefore, when the writer later refers to the Torah as “growing old, passing away”, he is not referring only to those aspects related to the priesthood, but to all of the temporal aspects of Torah. To say otherwise is to misunderstand the text both linguistically and contextually. As I have stated previously, this does not negate the eternal aspects of Torah, rather it means that our explanation of Torah must be qualified to meet the reality of its application. A myopic singular definition of Torah only serves to show how great our lack of understanding is, both as Jews and “Messianics”. As High Priest Yeshua ministers as the original reconciler reflected in the temporal earthly priesthood but offering a better sacrifice (Himself). 4 Now if He were on earth, in the land, He would not be a priest at all, since there are those who offer the gifts according to the Torah; “Now if He were on earth, in the land,” At the time of the writing of this work Yeshua had ascended to the right hand of the Father (position of authority). He was not on earth, in the Roman occupied land of Israel. Also, when He was on earth He was not of Leviy and therefore not able to minister before the earthly altar. Simply put, the writer is saying, “If Yeshua were here right now (approx. 60 C.E.) He wouldn’t be offering Torah prescribed gifts because the Levitical priests (albeit some were apostate at that time) are offering those sacrifices and gifts as we speak…” Those who claim an original date of writing post destruction of the temple (70 C.E.) are left with an untenable argument based on the present tense reference to those who continue to offer the prescribed gifts and sacrifices of the Torah. Meaning, the temple sacrifices were still being performed by the Levitical priesthood (albeit partly apostate) at the time of the writing of this work. As I explained in my commentary on Hebrews chapter 5 the Aaronic priesthood was conferred onto Yeshua by Yochanan the Immerser. Another way of saying this is that through the immersion of Yeshua the priesthood of Aaron is translated into the priesthood of Yeshua, which is like that of Melkiy Tzedek. Also, as stated in my commentary on Hebrews 7: The writer of the Book to the Hebrews is not at any point suggesting that because Messiah Yeshua’s priesthood is in the order or type of that of Melkiy Tzedek (the mortal priest and king of Salem), that the priesthood of Aaron is redundant (this is clearly not the case given that the very acts of Messiah’s life and sacrificial practice, along with the function of intercession before God in the heavenly holy of holies as Kohen Gadol, reflect the Levitical priesthood which unlike Melkiy Tzedek’s priesthood, had the Mishkan [Tent of Meeting] and the Temple as shadows of the heavenlies, in which to approach God according to the order of the universe as He has set it in place). Therefore, Messiah’s Priesthood is reflected in both the priesthood of Melkiy Tzedek and the priesthood of Aaron (Levitical), and, without the sacrificial death of Messiah, foreshadowed in the Pesach of Israel and the Yom Kippur sacrifice of the Aaronic priesthood, there would be no possibility of another priest like Melkiy Tzedek arising. We note that there is a convergent nature to the priesthood of Yeshua. He unifies the two priesthoods of Melkiy Tzedek and Aaron, which are both in fact everlasting in Him. Given that Pinchas the grandson of Aaron was promised an everlasting priesthood: “And he (Pinchas) shall have it (the priesthood), and his seed after him, the covenant of an everlasting priesthood; because he was zealous for his God, and made an atonement for the children of Israel.” -Numbers 25:13 KJV 5 who serve (latreuō[G]) an imitation, copy, pattern, warning (hupodeigma[G]) and shadow, shade (skia[G]) of the heavenly things (epouranios[G]), just as Moshe[H] (drawn out one, resurrected one) was warned (chrēmatizō[G]) when he was about to make (epiteleō[G]) the Tent of Meeting (skēnē[G], hamishkan[H]); for, “See, heed, perceive (horaō[G], re’eih[H]),” He says, “that you make (va’aseih[H]) all things, individually and collectively (pas[G], kol[H]) by the pattern, shape, print, manner, fashion, figure (tupos[G]) which was shown (deiknuō[G], mare’eh[H]) to you on the mountain (ho oros[G], bahar[H]).” [Exodus 25:40] 5 who serve an imitation, copy, pattern, warning and shadow, shade of the heavenly things, just as Moshe[H] (drawn out one, resurrected one) was warned when he was about to make the Tent of Meeting; for, “See, heed, perceive,” He says, “that you make all things, individually and collectively by the pattern, shape, print, manner, fashion, figure which was shown to you on the mountain.” [Exodus 25:9, 40] “who serve an imitation, copy, pattern, warning and shadow, shade of the heavenly things,” The writer stresses the point that the Levitical priests served, and at that time continued to serve at a sanctuary that was a copy reflecting the true heavenly Sanctuary. Reverent awe and respect for the holiness of the original is the reason Moses was commanded to be careful to precisely render that which God had instructed him to erect as a temporal sign pointing to the original. It was important that the Mishkan (Tent of Meeting) and the sacrificial practices point to the heavenly fullness of God’s redemptive purpose in reconciling humanity to Himself in Messiah Yeshua. 6 Yet now (nuni[G]) He has obtained (tugchanō[G]) a more excellent (diaphoros[G]) ministry, service (leitourgia[G]) to the extent that He is also the mediator, go between, reconciler (mesitēs[G]) of a better (kreittōn[G]) covenant (diathēkē[G], habriyt[H]), which has been enacted, made law, established (nomotheteō[G]) on better (kreittōn[G]) promises (epaggelia[G]). 7 For if that first (prōtos[G], harishonah[H]) covenant had been free of grounds for fault, defect, blame (amemptos[G]) no place (topos[G], makom[H]) would have been sought for a second (deuteros[G]). 6 Yet now He has obtained a more excellent ministry, service to the extent that He is also the mediator, go between, reconciler of a better covenant, which has been enacted, made law, established on better promises. The emphasis here is on qualifying the differences and not promoting the latter at the expense of the former. As explained, Messiah’s ministry does not supersede in the sense of doing away with the former, but is superior. It is crucial that the reader understand the continuity of Torah and new covenant in a way that does not do away with or alienate the former things that point to it. Some of those former things remain eternally while others are passing away. Overly simplistic interpretation of these verses has led to numerous false theological constructs at both extremes of the ecclesiastical debate (an unnecessary debate at that). We note that Messiah’s reconciliation through “a better covenant” has been made Torah (law, instruction), established on better promises, oaths which God vowed against His Own soul (Heb. 6:13). Yeshua’s mediation of the new covenant is better because it does what the temporary blood of animals could not. It is better because it is established on the oaths of God and not reliant on the ability of human beings to keep godly instruction. Those Messianic Jewish commentators who claim that the Torah of the new covenant spoken of in Jeremiah 31:31-34 is identical to that of Moses are in grave error. How can a Torah that indicts sin be established eternally (the new covenant is an everlasting covenant [Heb. 13:20])? If as the writer of the Book to the Hebrews says the former covenant is aging “old, decaying” and “soon to pass away” [v.13] (which is not a mistranslation as some falsely claim), how can it be eternal? Messianic Jewish zealots who follow the rabbinical misteaching that Torah (the books of Moses) is eternal in its entirety are with heart-breaking irony, submitting the Torah of the Spirit of Life to the false doctrines of men (Rom. 8:2). As I have said previously, there is no need for an indictment against sin in a world (olam haba, world to come, eternal life) devoid of sin. Therefore, the Torah of Messiah that is eternal will not (following the judgment) include those parts of the Torah of Moses which are now passing away “old, decaying” (v.13). Those who claim to be “Shomeir Torah” keeper of Torah, must consider these questions: 1.How are you keeping the mitzvot concerning the sacrificial system? 2.Are you bringing animals for blood atonement concerning your every sinful thought? 3.If you were able to do these things, are you certain that having atoned for every sin with the blood of animals, you will not have a sinful thought at any given point prior to death and therefore be separated from God’s holiness regardless of all your efforts? If one answers “I’m not able to” or, “no” to any of the above (the only possible answers of a human being speaking truthfully), then for that person to claim to be “Shomeir Torah” a keeper of Torah, is to lie (thus, breaking the command and proving that they are not Shomeir Torah). 7 For if that first covenant had been free of grounds for fault, defect, blame no place would have been sought for a second. This does not mean that the Torah (which Rav Shaul calls good and its mitzvot righteous and holy Romans 7:12) is at fault, but that fault was found in humanity’s inability to satisfy the requirements of Torah. This is qualified in the following verse. In both the Greek and Hebrew texts the word “place” is used in reference to the second and better covenant. This is important to the Jewish audience of this work. HaMakom (the Place), is a Hebrew euphemism describing the Temple Mount. The writer is alluding to the fact that the new, better covenant was always intended to be made, not on the temple mount but in that heavenly place (makom) for which the temple mount is an earthly shadow. Therefore, because the temporal sacrificial system of Torah would never fully atone for sin, and because fault was found in humanity’s inability to satisfy the requirements of Torah, another “place” makom (the heavenly holy of holies) was sought upon which to offer the eternal blood atonement of God Himself manifest as Imanu-El (with us God), the King Messiah Yeshua (our Great High Priest). With relation to HaMakom (the place), our forefather Jacob was given the revelation of Yeshua’s work of reconciliation in “HaMakum” the place, while his head lay on “HaEven” the stone (foundation, stone, location of the binding of Isaac, location of King David’s angelic revelation, and so on). Thus, long before the establishment of the temple, Jacob saw that in order for humanity to be reconciled to God (Jacob’s stairway, stairway from and to the heavens) there was need for atonement to be made in another “place” by a descendant of Jacob, that place being in the heavenlies, and that descendant being Yeshua the King Messiah, our Great High Priest. For further study regarding HaMakom (the place) please see my commentary on Genesis 28: https://www.bethmelekh.com/yaakovs-commentary---15081497151214931513-1497150615111489/god-is-in-this-place-genesis-28 8 For in finding fault (memphomai[G]) with the people, He says, “Behold, now, pay attention (idou[G], hineih[H]) days (hēmera[G], yamiym[H]) are coming (erchomai[G]), says the Lord (Ho Kurios[G], YHVH[H]), When I will bring about, make, fully fill, bring to its goal (sunteleō[G]) a new covenant (kainos diathēkē[G], briyt chadashah[H]) With the house (oikos[G], beiyt[H]) of Yisrael[H] (overcomes in God) and the house (oikos[G], beiyt[H]) of Y’hudah[H] (praise), [Jeremiah 31:31] 8 For in finding fault with the people, He says, “Behold, now, pay attention days are coming, says the Lord, When I will bring about, make, fully fill, bring to its goal a new covenant With the house of Yisrael[H] and the house of Y’hudah[H], [Jeremiah 31:31] This begins the writers exposition of Jeremiah 31:31-34 Some Jewish commentators claim that the context of Jeremiah’s prophecy denotes a return to Torah observance following the Babylonian exile, and while this may have happened in part through Ezra and Nehemiah, it did not happen to the extent prophesied by Jeremiah. In fact quite the opposite, the returning Jews did not continue in their initial devotion to Torah observance, and subsequently Israel once again fell short of God’s moral standard. Therefore, given our history as a people and the cyclical nature of Hebrew prophecy (multiple fulfilments), it is at best delusional and at worst desperate to claim that Jeremiah’s prophecy was fulfilled following the Babylonian exile, it certainly was not. In fact, Jeremiah’s prophecy is being outworked in the hearts of all who turn to God through Yeshua by faith through grace, perpetually first in the Jew and also continually for the nations. The ultimate expression of this prophecy finding its fullness in the now and yet fully manifest Kingdom of God (Olam Haba). “For in finding fault with the people” The grounds for fault with the first covenant was the fault of the people and not any fault of the Torah or the participation of God in that covenant. We must remember that a covenant is entered into by two parties. This is why in the previous verse the more general Greek word amemptos[G] is used, while in the present case the middle voice memphomai[G] points directly at the ones in whom fault was found with regard to their inability to keep the former covenant. “When I will bring to its goal a new covenant” Like the pattern for the Priesthood of Yeshua, the new covenant precedes the Mosaic covenant, or why is the new covenant being brought to its goal? “With the house of Yisrael[H] and the house of Y’hudah[H]” We note that the new covenant, like the former covenant, is made with chosen, ethnic, religious, empirical Israel (descendants of Jacob), with all Israel and in the house of Judah through the King Messiah, the Greater Son of David. This covenant is accessible to all through the Jew Yeshua, however, it is made with Israel (the descendants of Jacob) and with Judah (both ethnic designations reflecting the continued redemptive purposes of God regarding His chosen people). 9 Not (ou[G], lo[H]) like, according to (kata[G]) the covenant (ho diathēkē[G], khabriyt[H]) which I made with their fathers (patēr[G], avotam[H]) On the day (hēmera[G], bayom[H]) I took them by the hand (cheir[G], veyadam[H]) To lead (exagō[G]) them out of the land (ho ge[G], me’eretz[H]) of Egypt (Aiguptos[G], Mitzrayim[H]); For they did not continue (emmenō[G]) in My (mou[G], et[H]) covenant (diathēkē[G], be’riytiy[H]), And I did not regard them (ameleo[G]) [alt. Hebrew Masoretic text reads “I was their Husband”], says the Lord (Ho Kurios[G], YHVH[H]). [Jeremiah 31:32] 9 Not like, according to the covenant which I made with their fathers On the day I took them by the hand To lead them out of the land of Egypt; For they did not continue in My covenant, And I did not regard them [alt. Hebrew Masoretic text reads “I was their Husband”], says the Lord. [Jeremiah 31:32] The Mosaic covenant gives grounds for finding fault in those who were tasked with obeying it because it is an indictment against sin that is impossible for a human being devoid of God’s strength, to keep. The new covenant which the former covenant points to is different because it is reliant on God’s strength of will and not on the weak will of human beings. This is why the LORD qualifies Israel’s inability to keep the former covenant by saying “they did not continue in My covenant.” The differences in the Septuagint and Masoretic texts need not be contentious. If the Septuagint (which predates the Masoretic text) is the better rendering then it is consistent with God turning His face away from those who wilfully reject Him (Isaiah 59:2). On the other hand, if the Masoretic text is the better reading, then the allusion is to the broken heart of God as spurned Husband. Both understandings are consistent with one another. Therefore, it is a false choice that asks as to choose between the two. They are convergent and true, inspired by the Holy Spirit, to Whom all language submits. 10 For this is the covenant (ho diathēkē[G], habriyt[H]) which I will make with the house (oikos[G], beiyt[H]) of Yisrael[H] (overcomes in God) After those days (hēmera[G], yamiym[H]), declares the Lord (Ho Kurios[G], YHVH[H]): I will put My instructions (nomos[G], toratiy[H]) into their minds, understanding, inward parts, (dianoia[G], bekirbam[H]) And write, inscribe (epigraphō[G], ekh’tavenah[H]) them on their hearts, core being, inner person (kardia[G], lebam[H]). And I will be their God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]), And they shall be to Me a people (laos[G], liy le’am[H]). [Jeremiah 31:33] 10 For this is the covenant which I will make with the house of Yisrael[H] (overcomes in God) After those days, declares the Lord: I will put My instructions into their minds, understanding, inward parts, And write, inscribe them on their hearts, core being, inner person. And I will be their God, And they shall be to Me a people. [Jeremiah 31:33] “This covenant which I will make with the house of Israel” Having promised to make the new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, which is how Israel as a whole went into Babylonian captivity (as a divided people), God now confirms the reunification of all the tribes subsequent to the exile. The new covenant will be made at some point following the return of all the tribes to the land of Israel. This of course happened in the first century C.E. when Yeshua initiated the new covenant through His sacrificial death and resurrection, being that with few exceptions (and then symbolically) a covenant (related to cutting) is made through blood. The Hebrew text of Jeremiah 31:33 does not say, “I will put My Torah” in the sense of the entire Torah of Moses but, “I will put toratiy my instructions”. If Jeremiah had intended us to understand “the Torah” (Books of Moses) as a whole he would have written “Ha Torah sheliy” or simply “Ha Torah”. This is significant because the instructions of God written on the core being of the one who receives the new covenant are everlasting (Heb. 13:20) but the Torah of Moses in its entirety is not. “Now may the God of peace, who through the blood of the eternal covenant brought back from the dead our Lord Yeshua, that great Shepherd of the sheep,” -Hebrews 13:20 (Author’s translation) To say otherwise (as many “Messianics” are so fond of) is to misrepresent the text of both Jeremiah and the Book to the Hebrews, and the very nature of the Gospel itself (it is Good News because it solves the problem of the bad news). Even if Jeremiah 31:31-34 teaches that the new covenant puts the entire Torah of Moses on the inner being of believers, it must teach it with the knowledge that only those parts of Torah that are eternal will remain following the judgement. Once again, properly understanding Torah (a feminine word meaning instruction) requires us to properly qualify its use, contextualise its use and confirm its intended meaning in light of the wealth of Scripture. A myopic Torah of Moses view of the word Torah and its implications shows a tragic disregard toward both its ancient Biblical and modern rabbinical usage. Torah can mean: a. Books of Moses b. A specific instruction or set of instructions within the Books of Moses c. The entire Hebrew Bible d. All Jewish teaching including Mishnah, Gemara, Talmud, Zohar, Shulchan Arukh. And with regard to the New Testament, Torah (nomos[G]) is qualified using words like “spirit”, “sin and death” and so on. “the Torah of the Spirit of life has set you free in Messiah Yeshua from the Torah of sin and death.” [Rav Shaul's letter to the Roman Believers 8:2] In Messiah through one sacrifice we have been made perfect (outside of time and space: the eternal aspects of Torah) and are being made holy (within time and space until the judgement: the temporary passing instructions of the Torah indictment against sin) [Heb.10:14]. Ultimately the Torah of the Spirit of life points us to a return to knowing only good, just as Adam and Eve did prior to taking and eating the knowledge of good and evil. One who knows only good need not be instructed to do good, because good is inherent in that one’s nature and is the fruit of every action. Therefore, all parts of the Torah of Moses that concern indictment against sin or admonishment to good deeds will be redundant in the Olam Haba (world to come: a world devoid of sin), and as the text of this chapter goes on to say, “the first covenant is old, decaying” (v.13). Thus, the Torah of the Spirit of Life in Messiah Yeshua carries the eternal aspects of the Torah of Moses (authored by Yeshua) but does not carry the indictment against sin included in the Torah of Moses beyond the judgement seat of Messiah in God. Those who make Torah the goal, miss the Goal of Torah (Rom. 10:4). 11 And they will not teach (ve’lo yelamdu[H]), each one his neighbour (plēsion[G], rei’eihu[H]), And each one his brother (adelphos[G], achiyv[H]), saying, ‘Know, understand, learn, comprehend (ginōskō[G], de’u[H]) the Lord (Ho Kurios[G], YHVH[H]),’ For they will all, individually and collectively (pas[G], kolam[H]) know, see, perceive (eidō[G], yedu[H]) Me, From the least (mikros[G], lemiktanam[H]) to the greatest (megas[G], gedolam[H]) of them. [Jeremiah 31:34a] 11 And they will not teach, each one his neighbour, And each one his brother, saying, ‘Know, understand, learn, comprehend the Lord,’ For they will all, individually and collectively know, see, perceive Me, From the least to the greatest of them. [Jeremiah 31:34a] This refers to those who enter into the new covenant, and, in context, refers to the redemption of the entire remnant of ethnic-religious Israel (the descendants of Jacob) [Romans 11:25-32]. The order of the giving of the new covenant is important. It is given to the house of Israel and Judah, to all Jews through the Jew Yeshua and the nations have access to it only through the Jew Yeshua. It follows that if the Torah (Instruction) of God is written on the centre of our being in Messiah Yeshua, that we will have no need of exterior Torah instruction from other new covenant receiving human beings in order to know what is right and wrong, or how we should outwork our faith in Him (Halakhah). This makes the ludicrous arguments entered into by so called “Messianic” over which parts of Torah should be kept and by whom and which festivals are obligatory and which aren’t, and whether it’s evil to worship God on Sunday or should all believers keep the Shabbat, and do Gentiles have to keep kosher and bla, bla, bla… utterly foolish spiritual masturbation! The text itself is an indictment against such nonsense, it says “And they will not teach, each one his neighbour, And each one his brother, saying, ‘Know, understand, learn, comprehend the Lord,’!!!!!” On the other hand, this does not apply to non-believers who have either not yet heard or have wilfully rejected the new covenant. The context denotes those who have had past tense, the new covenant Torah written on the centre of their being. 12 For I will be merciful, forgiving (hileōs[G], eslach[H]) toward their unrighteousness, iniquity, perversion (adikia[G], la’avonam[H]), And their sins (hamartia[G], ulchatatam[H]) [missing the mark set by God’s holiness], and their iniquities, perversions (anomia[G]) I will no longer bring to mind, perpetually (mnaomai[G], ezkar-od[H]).” [Jeremiah 31:31-34] 13 When He said, “new covenant, (kainos[G], briyt chadashah[H])” He has indicated that the first is old, decaying (palaioō[G]). Now (de[G]) whatever is decaying (palaioō[G]) and growing old (gēraskō[G]) is about to (eggus[G], karuv[H]) disappear, pass away, be destroyed (aphanismos[G], kitzah[H]). 12 For I will be merciful, forgiving toward their unrighteousness, iniquity, perversion, And their sins [missing the mark set by God’s holiness], and their iniquities, perversions I will no longer bring to mind, perpetually.” [Jeremiah 31:31-34] Because the blood of animals could not perpetually atone for sin, the sins of Israel were always before God (brought to mind). With regard to the new covenant however, the blood of the King Messiah Yeshua the Son of God atones for sin once for all eternity. Therefore, what God has utterly removed He no longer brings to mind, and this, in Messiah, means we are perpetually right with God in perfect love relationship. 13 When He said, “new covenant,” He has indicated that the first is old, decaying. Now whatever is decaying and growing old is about to disappear, pass away, be destroyed. Many “Messianics” try to manipulate this text, jumping through semantic hoops they seek to make the text say what it does not. They do what the Scripture warns against, changing the meaning of words to reflect their opposites, teaching the doctrines of men as if they were the Torah of God. All in a desperate attempt to defend a Torah that needs no defence and pursue a shadow that is “old, decaying” and “about to disappear”. As the Scripture clearly teaches and as I have consistently affirmed, the Torah of Moses, authored by Yeshua in God, serves as an indictment against sin in the present age: it is a sign pointing to its Goal, Yeshua, the King Messiah and Great High Priest of Israel and all peoples. Those parts of it that address the fallen world will cease at the judgement according to the words of Yeshua Himself: “18 Amen, amen, in truth, in truth, I tell you, until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter or mark shall by no means pass away from the Torah until all things come to pass.” -Matthew 5:18 TLV The key to understanding this correctly is the word “until”, which means that these things will happen and the Torah (that part of it which indicts against sin) will pass away (just as the Book to the Hebrews teaches). Heaven and earth will pass away, and all things will come to pass (Isa. 34:4; Matt. 24:35; Luke 21:33; Rev. 6:14; 20:11; 21:1). Therefore, Yeshua is saying that the Torah indictment against sin will remain only until the judgement, after which, in the sinless world to come, there will be no need for it. Ironically many use this same verse to promote a focus on law keeping, when what it actually teaches is that… “10 …all who rely on the works of Torah instruction are under a curse—for the Scriptures say, “Cursed is everyone who does not keep doing everything written in the scroll of the Torah.” 11 It is plain to see that no one is justified before God by Torah, for ‘the righteous shall live by faith, trust, belief.’” -Galatians 3:10-11 (Author’s translation) In Messiah we are set free from the curse of the indictment. Rather than seeking to earn God’s love through Torah observance we are gifted the new covenant in Messiah’s blood which brings us into the eternal security of God’s love through God’s redemptive work. Thus, Messiah in us outworks His Torah. We no longer seek vainly to do for God, rather we walk in Messiah and our doing comes from God. For further study and deeper understanding please read my book Do Less, Be More: https://www.amazon.com/Do-Less-Be-More-Verses-ebook/dp/B07J2NFDQ7/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=Do+Less+Be+More+Yaakov+Ben+Yehoshua&qid=1628215161&sr=8-1 Copyright 2021 Yaakov Brown “for the Torah[H] made nothing perfect” Because the purpose of Torah is to point to the perfector Yeshua the King Messiah. The Torah indicts against sin, Messiah delivers from sin. The Torah continues to serve its purpose until the end of the age, and Messiah continues to purpose salvation unto everlasting life. The Torah is not eternal, how could it be? There will be no need for an indictment against sin in the sinless Olam Haba (world to come). Only the knowledge of good will remain, we will therefore, have no need of instruction against evil. If there is an eternal Torah, it is devoid of the confines of mitzvot (commands). Freedom has no need of fences. One who knows only to do good need not be told to do it, everything he does is good. Introduction:
Before continuing to study the writer’s exposition of Psalms 110, and the comparative teaching concerning the priesthood of Melkiy Tzedek as it reflects the type of priesthood ordered by the Messiah, which is over all peoples regardless of ethnicity, we first need to understand that many of the Jewish Messiah followers of the latter first century still found the idea that Gentiles could be collectively saved or atoned for before the God of Israel, untenable. While they held that the righteous among the nations could be part of the Olam Haba (world to come), they did not necessarily believe that the redemptive purposes of God for the nations were equivalent to His purposes for Israel, and in part they were correct, but only in part. The writer of the Book to the Hebrews knows that many of those who would receive his Holy Spirit inspired words still considered Messiah Yeshua relevant predominantly and or only to Jews (descendants of Jacob). Therefore, he is writing (inspired by the Holy Spirit) in such a way as to shake them loose from their spiritual bigotry. He is most certainly not writing in order to rob them of their unique ethno-religious identity as Jews chosen by God. Nor is he at any point suggesting that because Messiah Yeshua’s priesthood is in the order or type of that of Melkiy Tzedek (the mortal priest and king of Salem), that the priesthood of Aaron is redundant (this is clearly not the case given that the very acts of Messiah’s life and sacrificial practice, along with the function of intercession before God in the heavenly holy of holies as Kohen Gadol, reflect the Levitical priesthood which unlike Melkiy Tzedek’s priesthood, had the Mishkan [Tent of Meeting] and the Temple as shadows of the heavenlies, in which to approach God according to the order of the universe as He has set it in place). Therefore, Messiah’s Priesthood is reflected in both the priesthood of Melkiy Tzedek and the priesthood of Aaron (Levitical), and, without the sacrificial death of Messiah, foreshadowed in the Pesach of Israel and the Yom Kippur sacrifice of the Aaronic priesthood, there would be no possibility of another priest like Melkiy Tzedek arising. Additionally, Messiah’s Priesthood, which is like Melkiy Tzedek’s priesthood, is not Melkiy Tzedek’s priesthood. It is Yeshua’s priesthood. It is of fundamental importance that this is understood. The writer makes this clear but the interpretation of numerous theologians through the centuries has muddied the waters for many. As is the case with all Scripture (scrolls of the original texts), there are no chapter breaks or verse markers (or punctuation for that matter) in the scroll of the Book to the Hebrews. It’s important to see the text of this chapter as a continuation of the previous chapter, the last verses of chapter 6 being: 19 This hope we have as an anchor of the soul, a hope both certain, loyal and forceful, reliable and one which enters into the house (Temple), the inner veil parochet[H] [the veil hung before the holy of holies], 20 where Yeshua has entered as a forerunner for us, having become a high priest forever according to the word, order, type, style, arrangement of Melkiy Tzedek. BOOK TO THE HEBREWS Chapter 7 (Author’s translation) 1For this Melkiy Tzedek[H], king of Shalem[H], priest of El Elyon[H] God Most High, who met Avraham[H] (Father of many peoples) as he was returning from the slaughter, cutting to pieces of the kings and blessed [spoke blessing over] him, [Gen. 14:18-20] 2 to whom also Avraham[H] apportioned a tenth of all, was first of all, by interpretation, king of righteousness, and then also king of Shalem[H], which is king of peace. 3 Without father, without mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, but was a copy, a model passed off as, a facsimile, a foreshadow of the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually. 4 Now observe how great this man was to whom Avraham[H], the patriarch, founder of the tribe, progenitor, head of the fathers gave a tenth of the spoils, off the top of the heap. 5 And indeed those of the sons of Leviy[H] (joined to) who receive the office of priest have a commandment, precept to collect a tenth from the people according to the Torah[H] (Instruction), that is, from their brothers/people, although they come from the loins Avraham[H]. 6 But he whose genealogy, family is not counted from them, collected a tenth from Avraham[H] and spoke a blessing over him who has been given the promises. 7 And beyond all dispute the lesser is blessed by the greater. 8 In this case mortal men receive tithes, but there he of whom it is recorded that he lives. 9 And, so I could say, through Avraham[H] even Leviy[H], who received tithes, has paid tithes, 10 for he was still in the loins of his forefather when Melkiy Tzedek[H] met him. 11 If therefore, perfecting, completing, fulfilling was through the Levitical priesthood, [for on the basis of it the people received the Torah[H]], what further need was there for another priest to arise according to the order, arrangement, type, style of Melkiy Tzedek[H], and not be designated according to the order, arrangement, type, style of Aharon[H]? 12 For when the priesthood is translated, it is necessary that there takes place a translation of Torah[H] also. 13 For the one about whom these things are said belongs to another tribe, from which no one has officiated at the altar. 14 For it is evident that our Lord is descended from Yehudah[H], a tribe with reference to which Moshe[H] said nothing concerning priesthood. 15 And this is clearer still, if another priest arises according to the likeness of Melkiy Tzedek[H], 16 who has become a priest not on the basis of a law of physical (ethnic) requirement, but according to the miraculous power of an indestructible, endless, insoluble life. 17 For it is attested of Him, “You are a priest forever According to the order, arrangement, fashion, style of Melkiy-tzedek[H].” [Ps. 110:4 (109:4 LXX)] 18 For, on the one hand, there is putting away of a former commandment because of its weakness and unprofitableness 19 (for the Torah[H] made nothing perfect); but the introducing of a better hope, through which we draw near to God. 20 And accordingly not without an oath 21 (for they indeed became priests without an oath, but He with an oath through the One who said to Him, “HaShem (YHVH: Mercy) has sworn And will not change His mind, ‘You are a priest forever’”; 22 by the same extent Yeshua[H] also has become the guarantee of a better covenant. 23 The former priests, on the one hand, existed in greater numbers because they were prevented by death from continuing; 24 Yeshua[H], on the other hand, because He continues, abides, dwells, remains forever, has an immutable, unchanging priesthood. 25 Therefore, He is also able to save to the full end, perfectly, forever those who come to God through Him, since He always lives to make intercession for them. 26 For it was fitting for us to have such a high priest, holy, innocent, undefiled, separated from sinners, and made higher than the heavens; 27 who does not need to offer sacrifices daily, like those high priests, first for His own sins [missing the mark set by God’s holiness] and then for the sins of the people, because He did this once for all when He offered up His soul. 28 For the Torah[H] appoints men as high priests who are infirm, weak, but the word, essence, substance of the oath, which came after the Torah[H], appoints a Son, who has been made consecrated forever. HEBREWS 7 (line upon line) 1For this Melkiy Tzedek[H] (My king of Righteousness), king of Shalem[H] (Peace, wholeness, well-being), priest of El Elyon[H] God Most High, who met Avraham[H] (Father of many peoples) as he was returning from the slaughter, cutting to pieces (kopē[G]) of the kings, (basileus[G], hamelakhiym[H]) and blessed [spoke blessing over] (eulogeō[G], yivar’cheihu[H]) him, [Gen. 14:18-20] 2 to whom also Avraham[H] apportioned a tenth (dekatē[G]) of all, was first (prōton[G]) of all, by interpretation (hermēneuō[G]), king of righteousness (basileus dikaiosunē[G]), and then also king of Shalem[H], which is king of peace (basileus eirēnē[G], melekh hashalom[H]). 1For this Melkiy Tzedek[H], king of Shalem[H], priest of El Elyon[H] God Most High, who met Avraham[H] (Father of many peoples) as he was returning from the slaughter, cutting to pieces of the kings, and blessed [spoke blessing over] him, [Gen. 14:18-20] This is a paraphrase of the historical narrative recorded in Genesis 14. The writer of the Book to the Hebrews touches on the elements of the story that best convey his drash (comparative teaching). He is by no means expounding the finer details of the historical narrative. This is a drash on, and not a literal interpretation of Genesis 14. We note that Melkiy Tzedek was both a king and a priest, roles that were distinct and separate in Israelite history, and that he did not know God as YHVH but as El Elyon (God above all Gods, Supreme God). Additionally Melkiy Tzedek approached Avraham, and not the other way around. All of this is a picture or foreshadow, a prefigure of Messiah and His ministry, but does not mean Melkiy Tzedek the mortal king-priest was Yeshua. To the contrary, it means that he was not. Shalem (Jerusalem), from which Melkiy Tzedek had come was most likely named for the Canaanite deity Shalim. Shalim (evening star deity) and Shahar (morning star deity) were Canaanite mountain gods of dusk and dawn. This is one of the reasons it is important that Melkiy Tzedek is clearly identified as worshipping El Elyon (God most high), Whom the Canaanites would have understood as the Supreme God of their pantheon. Once again, with these things in mind, it is blasphemous to say that Melkiy Tzedek and Yeshua are one in the same. The nature of Melkiy Tzedek’s religious environment make the idea abhorrent. Melkiy Tzedek is a mortal type, used as a foreshadow, nothing more. NB: Regarding the Genesis 14 account, it’s worth noting for the purpose of context, that the plunder of the five defeated kings and the plunder of the four previously defeated kings made up a total spoil gleaned from nine kings, Avraham being the tenth king/ruler. We note that Avraham (then Avram) returned the captive people of Sodom and took nothing of the spoils of Sodom except that which was rightfully owed to his men for the work they had performed on behalf of the defeated king of Sodom. Avraham, as the tenth king (king of fullness) then offered a tithe (10) of fullness to the then priestly representative of El Elyon (God most high). A tenth of his personal wealth. 2 to whom also Avraham[H] apportioned a tenth of all, was first of all, by interpretation, king of righteousness, and then also king of Shalem[H], which is king of peace. The writer explains the interpretation of the Hebrew name of the ancient kingly priest Melkiy Tzedek as part of the midrashic process and not in order to explain the Hebrew language to the believing Jewish recipients or because he is addressing non-Jews who lack Hebrew understanding. Given that the recipients of the work are believing Jews, we should understand the pretext to these words as being “You know this story, you know Melkiy Tzedek’s name means ‘King of Righteousness’ and that Shalem is an old name for Jerusalem the city where peace is outpoured”. The writer is using the meaning of Melkiy Tzedek’s name to teach a remez (hint) at an allegory/comparison. This was common rabbinical practice from prior to the first century C.E. and beyond, Yeshua Himself employed this type of teaching method, known as PaRDeS (p’shat [plain], remez [hint], drash [comparative], sod [mystery]). Knowing this (alongside numerous other textual and historical indicators) puts death to the foolish idea that the writer of the Book to the Hebrews is saying that Melkiy Tzedek and Yeshua are one in the same. They are not. It saddens me greatly that this has to be emphasised so emphatically due to the proliferation of false interpretation at the present time. An explanation of Yeshua’s use of the teaching method PaRDeS: Is there any implicit support for the rabbinical method PaRDeS within the texts of the Bible? The P’shat or plain meaning is self-explanatory. There is no need to explain to a reader that the book means what it says. Therefore, there is no need to show evidence from the Bible that God intends for us to take it at face value relative to context: linguistic, cultural, historical, geographical, figurative, poetic and metaphorical. The first mention of the practice of examining the Scriptures in an exegetical way is in the book of Ezra the scribe. “For Ezra had set his heart to l’drosh inquire of the Torah of Adonai, to observe and to teach its statues and ordinances in Israel.” –Ezra 7:10 The root “darash (drash)” is used specifically in relation to the Torah and therefore describes a practice of interpretation and an intention to walk according to that interpretation and teach it to others. This is the perfect example of what it means to make a drash, or comparative teaching. As Jews who follow Yeshua, we should look to Him and His disciples for evidence of the use of rabbinical interpretive method. If He doesn’t teach using the PaRDeS method, then why would we? Let’s take a look at just a few of the many Brit HaChadashah (New Testament) examples of PaRDeS found in the book of Matthew. As stated earlier, every part of Scripture has a plain meaning, therefore P’shat (the plain interpretation) is the basis for the subsequent methods of interpretation. Remez (Hint) Matthew 2:15 - "Out of Egypt I called my son." This is a quote from Hosea 11:1 and is being applied to Yeshua by Matthew. If we read it to refer to the p’shat (plain meaning) of Hosea 11:1, we must interpret it to refer to Israel (collectively). However, Matthew, the disciple of Yeshua, divinely inspired by God, interprets it as a remez (hint) which is alluding to the Messiah King as God’s Son. This is just one of many examples of Matthew’s use of remez. D'rash (Inquire) Matthew 18:18 - "... Whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven." This verse taken literally and out of context is often used by Christians to demand that spiritual powers submit to them. However, within the context of Matthew 18:14-18 the p’shat (plain meaning) refers to the practical application of principals concerning those who are sinning within the body of believers. Thus the plain meaning indicates a d'rash (comparative teaching) concerning the binding and loosing of our own actions according to Halakhah the way we walk (Yet another rabbinical method of teaching practice that Yeshua and His disciples applied to daily life). Sod (Mystery) Matthew 26:28 - "Then He took the cup, gave thanks and offered it to them saying, ‘Drink from it all of you, This is my blood’ ..." If the figurative language here were taken literally it would not only violate the Torah commandment against consuming blood, but along with other verses concerning the eating of Yeshua's flesh (John 6:51-56), could be understood as teaching cannibalism. Yeshua explains to His disciples that it is the Spirit that produces the deeper understanding (John 6:63), and that His words are spirit and life. This is evidence of a sod (mystery) that cannot be gleaned from the p’shat (plain meaning) of the text. A concept that is illuminated through spiritual revelation alone and by no other means. This particular sod (Mystery) would be fully revealed following His death and resurrection. So what can we conclude? a. There is no explicit schematic for Bible interpretation within Scripture. b. PaRDeS is implicit in Scripture. Both Messiah and His disciples employ it. c. It is arrogant and even misleading to use Greco-Roman techniques and post enlightenment textual criticism as tools for Scriptural interpretation while excluding the rabbinical interpretive tradition based on the hypocritical assumption that it is not divinely appointed. Therefore, with regard to Hebrews 7, the point of the writer’s drash is not to show how mystical and awesome Melkiy Tzedek is but how Superior and all existing Yeshua is. Focussing on Melkiy Tzedek (the mortal) misses the point entirely and worse, becomes soil for a seed of idolatry. 3 Without father (apator[G], belo-av[H]), without mother (ametor[G], belo-eim[H]), without genealogy, having neither beginning (archē[G]) of days nor end (telos[G]) of life (zoe[G], hachayiym[H]), but was a copy, a model passed off as, a facsimile, a foreshadow (aphomoioō[G]) of the Son of God (uihos Theos[G], Le-ven ha-Elohiym[H]), he remains (menō[G]) a priest perpetually (diēnekes[G], kohen leolam[H]). 4 Now observe how great this man was to whom Avraham[H] (Father of many peoples), the patriarch, founder of the tribe, progenitor, head of the fathers (patriarchēs[G], rosh ha’avot[H]) gave (didōmi[G], natan[H]) a tenth (dekatē[G]) of the spoils, off the top of the heap (akrothinion[G]). 3 Without father, without mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, but was a copy, a model passed off as, a facsimile, a foreshadow of the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually. “Without father…” His father is not recorded in the genealogies because the genealogies concern the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the focus of the Torah being to point to God’s redemptive work through the choosing of a certain people set apart unto Himself (the descendants of Jacob/Israel, the Jews). Melkiy Tzedek had a human father, his father is simply not recorded. Jews of the first century understood this to be a fact. At no time were they confused over the identity of Melkiy Tzedek. Nor did they believe that Melkiy Tzedek was in any way an eternal being. This is affirmed by the qualifying phrase “without genealogy” which is understood by those who received this work as “his genealogy is not recorded” and not to mean “he had no genealogy”. We know this because verse 6 of this same chapter says “But he whose genealogy, family is not counted from them...” Meaning, he had a genealogy but it’s neither counted according to Leviy nor recorded in the Torah. The Syriac version of the New Testament Book to the Hebrews reads "whose father and mother are not written in the genealogies". “he remains a priest perpetually” In the mind of the reader of the Torah, the man Melkiy Tzedek remains a priest because his genealogy is not recorded, nor is his appointment or any record of succession to his priesthood. This does not mean he wasn’t appointed or that there was not another priest of El Elyon who succeeded Melkiy Tzedek as priest in the then predominantly pagan city of Shalem, rather it simply means that the Torah was not concerned with keeping genealogical records of Gentiles. NB: Jewish tradition teaches that Melkiy Tzedek and Shem the son of Noach (Noah) are one in the same [Nedarim 32b]. However, this is not tenable given the generational gap between Abraham and Shem, and that Abraham himself is a descendant of Shem and of Ur of Chaldee, which bears no geographical correlation to Salem (Jerusalem). “Rabbi Zekharya said in the name of Rabbi Yishmael: The Holy One, Blessed be He, wanted the priesthood to emerge from Shem, so that his children would be priests, as it is stated: “And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine; and he was priest of God the Most High” (Gen. 14:18). Once Melchizedek, traditionally identified as Shem, placed the blessing of Abraham before the blessing of the Omnipresent, He had the priesthood emerge from Abraham in particular, and not from any other descendant of Shem.” -Nedarim 32b In later rabbinic literature Melkiy Tzedek bestows the priesthood on Avraham, who then becomes priest forever (Talmud Bavliy Ned. 32b; Lev. Rab. 25:6). This seems most likely to be a polemic written against the teaching of the Book to the Hebrews. The point being that both pre and post Messianic rabbinic thought understood Melkiy Tzedek to be a mortal king and not a transcendent being. The apocryphal book (mythos) 2 Chanoch (Enoch) 71-72 (71.29, 32), which claims that Melkiy Tzedek was miraculously born of his dead mother Nir, the wife of Noah’s brother and was kept safe through the flood (contrary to what the Torah teaches), in order to be a priest in the post flood generation, may well be one of many reasons for the increasing misteaching among pseudo learned Christians, that he is Yeshua preincarnate. It is sickening to think that non-inspired books full of occult ideology and syncretised Hellenistic mythos such as the books of Enoch, are being used as source material for the spread of pseudo Christian lies throughout the modern Christian community. Rav Shaul warns against Jewish mythos and vain genealogical arguments. We do well to heed his warning: “3 As I urged you, when I was leaving for Macedonia, stay in Ephesus to direct certain people not to pass on different instruction, 4 or to pay attention to myths and endless genealogies. These give rise to useless speculations rather than God’s training which is in faithfulness. 5 Now the goal of this command is love from of a pure heart and a clear conscience and a genuine faith. 6 Some, having missed the mark, have turned away to fruitless discussion— 7 wanting to be teachers of Torah, even though they do not understand what they keep saying or what they so dogmatically assert. 8 But we know that the Torah is good if one uses it legitimately, 9 knowing that the Torah is not given for a tzaddik but for the lawless and rebellious, for the ungodly and sinful, for the unholy and worldly, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers, 10 the sexually immoral, homosexuals, slave-traders, liars, perjurers, and for anything else that opposes sound teaching— 11 in keeping with what was entrusted to me, the glorious Good News of the blessed God.” -1 Timothy 1:3-11 TLV 4 Now observe how great this man was to whom Avraham[H], the patriarch, founder of the tribe, progenitor, head of the fathers gave a tenth of the spoils, off the top of the heap. The writer is using Melkiy Tzedek’s greatness as an example of the Superiority of Yeshua’s priesthood over that of Aaron (Levitical). The Superiority of Yeshua being one of the primary themes of the Book to the Hebrews. Hebrews 7:4-11 allude to five ways that Melkiy Tzedek is great: 1. He received a tithe of the plunder of battle from Avraham, even though Avraham was the Progenitor, father of all the Jews and what’s more, is the father of faith to all who believe. Nor did Melkiy Tzedek have a family connection to Avraham (despite the false assertions of certain Jewish traditions), and therefore, did not have the right that the Levitical priests had to receive tithes from their own brothers. In fact Melkiy Tzedek is not recorded by the Torah as being entitled to receive tithes from anyone, whereas the Levitical priests are commanded recieve a tenth of the income of the people of Israel (Heb. 7:4-6). 2. Melkiy Tzedek blessed Avraham, implying that Melkiy Tzedek was greater than Avraham (Heb. 7:6-7). 3. The Levitical priests receive tithes even though they die, whereas Melkiy Tzedek is recorded without genealogy and from a Midrashic view considered to be living, because the Tanakh doesn’t record his death (Heb. 7:8). 4. In order of greatness Melkiy Tzedek is placed above Avraham from whom he received a tenth and Avraham above Leviy, his progeny, who received a tenth from the people of Israel through the Levitical priesthood. This order seen as being subject to the fact that Avraham presented his tenth to Melkiy Tzedek while Leviy was still in his seed as a great grandson (Heb. 7:9-10). 5. The Jewish people were given the Torah in which contained a sacrificial system that required mediation via the priesthood of Leviy. But this system was temporary and could not facilitate eternal atonement. This indicates the need for another, different kind of priest, who is compared with Melkiy Tzedek, a priest, who according to the writer’s drash (comparative teaching) is superior to the greatest of the Levitical high priests, Aharon. The Tenth, Tithe, and Godly Giving (A Supplementary Teaching) Many within the community of faith see the giving of a tenth of their income as an obligation. Or worse, are encouraged to give money they don’t have to fund building projects and programmes that have little eternal value. This is an unfortunate consequence of a theological view point that seeks to utilize the financial elements of Israel’s priesthood to generate income for extra-biblical projects, while ignoring the far greater obligations of Israel’s commonwealth and her Temple centric worship system. It seems ludicrous that a community which so fervently professes the faith of Avraham through Messiah Yeshua (Jesus) [that is the Body of Believers, Church, Ecclesia of Messiah], should completely neglect the actions of Avraham in the matter of tithing/giving. The first person to present a tenth to HaShem is Avram that is Avraham before he became Avraham. This tenth is of great figurative significance to us as Jews. It is not merely an obligation, it is a symbol of all that is complete in us. To separate our financial wealth from our spirituality is as alien a concept to the observant Jew as the idea of separating soul and spirit. We cannot separate the inseparable. We are not spirits in a material world, we are souls (Nefesh), physical, mental, spiritual, emotional: we are complex and unified beings. We are Souls living in God. It is Hashem in Whom we dwell, He Who has made us echad (one). Therefore, if we are obligated to give a tenth we are also obligated to practise all of the instructions of the priesthood. However, if we are free to give, we have a High Priest Yeshua, Who, devoid of sin, is able to complete and perfect in us the fullness of all that His priesthood requires. Even ten (fullness) by ten (fullness) by ten (fullness) l’olam va’ed (for worlds eternal). Gen. 14:18 And Melkiy Tzedek (My King of righteousness) king of Shalem (Peace, wholeness, well-being) brought forth bread (lechem) and wine (yayin); and he was priest of El-Elyon (God the most high). Gen. 14:19 And He blessed him (Avram), and said: “Blessed be Avram (Father of a people) of El-Elyon (God the most high), Maker of heaven and earth; Gen. 14:20 and blessed be El-Elyon (God the most high), Who has delivered your enemies into your hand.” And he (Avram) gave him (Melkiy Tzedek) a tenth of all (Hebrews 7:4). –Berieshit (Genesis) 14:18-20 Figuratively speaking, the King of righteousness, Who is also the King of peace and the Great High Priest on behalf of all peoples brought bread and wine to the father of trust, which is faith. As High Priest of the Highest God, He spoke the blessing of God over the father of trust saying, “All blessing has come to you from God, father of a nation: the God above all gods has delivered your enemies and their wealth into your hands.” After the King had spoken these words the father of a nation responded to the King of righteousness, the King of Peace and Wholeness, the Great High Priest, by giving to him a tenth of all that he possessed, both that which had always been his and that which he had plundered from the nations. This tenth symbolized everything that the father of a nation was, and everything that belonged to him. Ten is a symbol of wholeness and completion, of a promise fulfilled and sustained. Therefore, Avram, father of a great people, prior to becoming Avraham, the father of many peoples, offered a symbol of all that he was and was to become, all that he possessed and was to possess. He offered this from the riches of his own household and from the households of the nations he had plundered. Therefore, it is a practice that can be entered into by both Israel and the nations. He offered the tenth freely to a Priest Who held position before the priesthood of Aaron, and Who was a type, a facsimile, a foreshadow for the Messiah, Who is the Kohen Ha-Gadol Rabah (Great High Priest). Therefore, this free-will tithe holds authority over the obligatory tithe of the temple service and the priesthood of Aaron. All the tithes and offerings of Israel are presented to God through the mediation of the priesthood of Aaron. Thus, the Kohen Gadol (High Priest) becomes the symbolic head of that priesthood. These tithes and offerings are intended to feed and clothe the priests of God and provide for the service of worship which is to be perpetuated generationally. Messiah did not cancel out the less effective priesthood of Aaron, rather He perfected it, translated it (as the Greek text of Hebrews renders) because He was before it. The Great High Priest Yeshua is now the mediator of the tithes and offerings of HaShem, only rather than making them an obligation He has turned them into an opportunity to respond to the freedom He has purchased on our behalf. This is why Melkiy Tzedek brings bread and wine to Avram. They’re symbols of both provision and redemption. Redemption through the sacrificial blood of Messiah’s death and provision through the life giving blood of His resurrection. Therefore, our tithing and giving are to be offered as a response to this freedom, in the same way that Avram offered his tenth in order to acknowledge the freedom and provision of God. The giving of our tenth, like Avram’s tenth, is a symbolic gesture which acknowledges that everything we are and all that we have belongs to God through Messiah Yeshua. Mark 12:41 He (Yeshua) sat down opposite the treasury and began watching how the people were putting money into the offering box. Many rich people were putting in a lot. Mark 12:42 Then a poor widow came and put in two small copper coins, worth less than a 50 cents. Mark 12:43 Calling His disciples over, He said to them, “Amen, it is certain, I tell you, this poor widow has put in more than all those contributing to the box! Mark 12:44 For they all put in from their surplus; but she, out of her poverty, put in everything she had, her whole living.” –Mark 12:41-44 In this historical account, Yeshua observes a poor widow and illuminates her actions as being the actions of someone who has decided to offer all to God in the practice of worshipping Him. Avram’s tenth was also a foreshadowing of the widow’s offering. He did not give it to cover a debt or as an obligatory tithe but as a symbolic gesture which said, “All that I have and am belong to you HaShem”. This teaches us that the value of that which we give is measured by the intention of the heart of the giver. A believer may never tithe to an organized community of faith, instead, he may open his home to strangers, spending more than a tenth on providing for them and caring for their wellbeing. He may be in the practice of giving to fellow believers when they’re in need or lending his possessions to be used by others in the community. By doing this he shows that all that he has belongs to HaShem. Thus, he gives to God in all circumstances, surpassing the requirement of the Torah. The number ten is a symbol of all that we are and all that we have. “The point is this: whoever sows sparingly shall also reap sparingly, and whoever sows bountifully shall also reap bountifully.” -2 Corinthians 9:6 When we look at tithing and giving as loosing, or sacrificing something we are missing the point. A wise farmer keeps aside a portion of the grain in order to seed the soil for the next season’s crop. He doesn’t consider this to be a loss or a sacrifice, rather he considers it a necessary part of the process of sowing and reaping. If he fails to plant enough seed he will also fail to reap a good crop. However, when he practices effective sowing he also reaps the benefit. The giving Rav Shaul is describing in 2 Corinthians is one or reciprocity. God owns all, therefore, He supplies us with all things and allows us to manage that supply. Additionally, rather than keeping the harvest for Himself and hoarding its benefits like a human land owner would do, God gives the fruit of the harvest back to the grower and leaves the grower to decide what he will offer as a token of his gratefulness to God. Today, there are those who misuse the principal of sowing and reaping to illicit funds from people who have nothing more to give. They encourage believers to mortgage houses and take out loans in order to, “reap” a greater reward. In doing so they bring poverty to the community of believers while they build worthless icons in memory of their so called ministries. This is a grievous sin against the body of Messiah that should not be tolerated. God does not ask us to give from what we don’t have but from what we have. The Scripture says, “My God shall supply all my needs according to His riches and glory” not, “I shall supply God’s needs according to my loans and lack of finances.” Those wolves among us, who steal from the poor in order to prosper themselves, may well have turned to the widow whom Yeshua spoke of and said, “If you’ve got a house you should mortgage it, two little coins will not reap the harvest God desires for your life, if you keep sowing so sparingly you’ll become even more accursed by God.” These liars, despicable leeches, false teachers, are condemned men. “2 Co. 9:7 Let each one give as he has decided in his heart, not grudgingly or under compulsion—for God loves a cheerful giver. 2 Co. 9:8 And God is able to make all grace overflow to you, so that by always having enough of everything, you may overflow in every good work. 2 Co. 9:9 As it is written, “He scattered widely, He gave to the poor; His righteousness endures forever.” 2Co 9:10 Now the One who supplies seed to the sower and bread for food will supply and multiply your seed and increase the harvest of your righteousness.” -2 Corinthians 9:7-10 Rav Shaul (Paul) explains that it is the heart (leiv) intention (the intention of the core being, not the intention of the emotion) that determines the value of the gift. Remember, it already belongs to God. He is a debtor to no one. If we give grudgingly it is as if we hadn’t given at all. Of course, due to the nature of sowing and reaping, we will also fail to benefit from an abundant crop. This is not a punitive action on God’s part, rather it is the natural result of our own actions. “2 Co. 9:11 You will be enriched in everything for all generosity, which through us brings about thanksgiving to God. 2 Co. 9:12 For this service of giving is not only supplying the needs of the kedoshiym (holy, set apart ones), but is also overflowing with many thanksgivings to God.” -2 Corinthians 9:11-12 When we give from an understanding of God’s goodness toward us we see God’s provision in all things and are grateful. This in turn inspires us to give to others from the overflow of our own spiritual and physical wealth. Rav Shaul calls this act a “service”, meaning an act of temple worship, a service of the priesthood of all believers. Thus, in Messiah, the Great High Priest, we act as priests under His authority. The result is not only blessing and thanks giving among the holy ones (believers), but also an overflow to those around us. This overflow draws people to Messiah, Who reconciles them to God. Thus giving is one of the ways that the Gospel is perpetuated. “Because of the evidence of this service, they praise God for the obedience of your affirmation of the Good News of Messiah and for the generosity of your contribution to them and to everyone.” -2 Corinthians 9:13 As a result of our giving other believers praise God and give Him the glory due His Name. Our giving affirms our certain hope in the Gospel of the Messiah. “2 Co. 9:14 And in their prayer for you, they long for you because of the surpassing grace of God upon you. 2 Co. 9:15 Thanks be to God for His indescribable gift!” -2 Corinthians 9:14-15 TLV Our giving is the fruit of the surpassing chesed (practical love) of God which is upon us. It is an act of worship that gives voice to the eternal truth that God’s greatest gift, the gift of His Son, has produced a great harvest of souls. Thus, we praise Him and give thanks to Him. Conclusion: 1. The number ten (Tithe) reminds us that all that we are and all that we have, belong to God in Messiah Yeshua. 2. The free-will tithe of Avram holds authority over the obligatory tithe of the temple service and the priesthood of Aaron. 3. God asks us to give of what we have, not from what we don’t have. Anyone who suggests that the widow in the story of the widow’s offering should mortgage her home because she didn’t give enough in order to reap abundantly, is misunderstanding the principal of sowing and reaping and worse, is committing a grievous sin against the body of Yeshua 4. We are not obligated to give, nor are we free not to give. Like trust and action (faith and works) freedom and giving go hand in hand, they are intrinsically linked, a complex unity 5. The purpose of our giving is to facilitate the perpetuation of the worship of God in our generation and to seed the Gospel work of God's people, so that others will be redeemed into His kingdom and enjoy the prosperity of God, which is both within and beyond the material world 6. Godly giving transforms the seed of temporary wealth into the fruit of eternal peace. 5 And indeed (amein[H]) those of the sons (uihos[G], b’naiy[H]) of Leviy[H] (joined to) who receive (lambanō[G]) the office of priest (hierateia[G], hakehunah[H]) have a commandment, precept (entolē[G]) to collect a tenth (apodekatoō[G], ma’aseir[H]) from the people according to the Torah[H] (Instruction), that is, from their brothers/people (adelphos[G], ha’am[H]), although they come from the loins (osphus[G]) of Avraham[H]. 6 But he whose genealogy, family (genealogeō[G], lemishpechotam[H]) is not counted from them, collected a tenth (apodekatoō[G], ma’aseir[H]) from Avraham[H] and spoke a blessing (eulogeō[G], beirakh[H]) over him who has been given (echō[G], netunah[H]) the promises (ho epaggelia[G], hahavtachah[H]). 5 And indeed those of the sons of Leviy[H] (joined to) who receive the office of priest have a commandment, precept to collect a tenth from the people according to the Torah[H] (Instruction), that is, from their brothers/people, although they come from the loins of Avraham[H]. “The office of priest” refers specifically to the office of High Priest. Although all Levites are considered priests, different subgroups played different roles. There was one priesthood but many facets. “But the priests the Levites, the sons of Zadok, that kept the charge of my sanctuary when the children of Israel went astray from me, they shall come near to me to minister unto me, and they shall stand before me to offer unto me the fat and the blood, saith the Lord GOD:” -Ezekiel 44:15 KJV “have a commandment, precept to collect a tenth from the people according to the Torah…” “20 The Lord said to Aaron, “You will have no inheritance in their land, nor will you have any share among them; I am your share and your inheritance among the Israelites. 21 “I give to the Levites all the tithes in Israel as their inheritance in return for the work they do while serving at the tent of meeting… 26 “Speak to the Levites and say to them: ‘When you receive from the Israelites the tithe I give you as your inheritance, you must present a tenth of that tithe as the Lord’s offering.” -Numbers 18:20-21, 26 NIV 6 But he whose genealogy, family is not counted from them, collected a tenth from Avraham[H] and spoke a blessing over him who has been given the promises. “He whose genealogy is not counted from them collected the tenth” Shows clearly that the one being spoken of has a genealogy, albeit unrecorded in the Torah. Avraham is the one who has been given the promises, and Melkiy Tzedek spoke a blessing over Avraham. All blessing having its origin in God. 7 And beyond all dispute (antilogia[G], vedavar yadua[H]) the lesser (katan[H]) is blessed (eulogeō[G], yevorakh[H]) by the greater (hagadol[H]). 8 In this case mortal men (anthrōpos[G], anashiym b’naiy temutah[H]) receive tithes (dekatē[G], ma’aseir[H]), but there (ekei[G]) he of whom it is recorded (martureō[G]) that he lives (zaō[G]). 9 And, so I could say (hos epos epos[G]), through Avraham[H] even Leviy[H], who received tithes (dekatē[G], ma’aseir[H]), has paid tithes (dekatē[G], ma’aseir[H]), 10 for he was still in the loins (osphus[G]) of his forefather (patēr[G], aviyo[H]) when Melkiy Tzedek[H] met him. 7 And beyond all dispute the lesser is blessed by the greater. It’s not true as some Jewish commentators suggest, that the greater does not always bless the lesser. Their reasoning is that Melkiy Tzedek blessed God, but at the same time, those who make this claim understand that all blessing comes from God and that as Jews when we say “Barukh Atah Adonay” We understand “All blessing is of You Adonay”. Therefore, Melkiy Tzedek “blessed God” (acknowledged that all blessing) comes from God. This is an example of God (the Greater) bestowing the ability to bless on Melkiy Tzedek (the lesser), and Melkiy Tzedek offering that blessing back to God so that it might be imparted to Avraham. This is “beyond all dispute” because all blessing comes from God, Who is the Creator of all and in Whom all things exist and have their being. Therefore, the idea that any created thing could bless anyone without that blessing being first supplied by God is ludicrous. 8 In this case mortal men receive tithes, but there he of whom it is recorded that he lives. The priests of Leviy all die, but through the remez hinted at in the historical record of Melkiy Tzedek we see that the Greatest High Priest Yeshua continues forever (Psalms 110:4; Heb. 7:24). 9 And, so I could say, through Avraham[H] even Leviy[H], who received tithes, has paid tithes, 10 for he was still in the loins of his forefather when Melkiy Tzedek[H] met him. “So I could say” follows the style of Midrashic rabbinical rhetoric. It indicates an allegorical or comparative use of the plain meaning of the text but does not seek to make a claim that the comparison is the literal meaning. Therefore, the fact that Melkiy Tzedek’s genealogy is not recorded is used as a figure foreshadowing a living priesthood that doesn’t die, is not mortal. The writer is not saying that Melkiy Tzedek is immortal. This teaching is based on a historical figure but is literary, not literal. 11 If therefore, perfecting, completing, fulfilling (teleiōsis[G]) was through the Levitical (Leuitikos[G], bikunat b’naiy leviy[H]) priesthood (hierōsunē[G]), [for on (epi[G]) the basis of it the people received the Torah[H] (nomotheteō[G])], what further (eti[G]) need was there for another priest (hiereus[G], kohen[H]) to arise according to the order, arrangement, type (taxis[G]) of Melkiy Tzedek[H], and not be designated according to the order, arrangement, type (taxis[G]) of Aharon[H]? 12 For when the priesthood (hierōsunē[G], hakehunah[H]) is translated (metatithēmi[G]), it is necessary that there takes place a translation (metatithēmi[G]) of Torah[H] also. 11 If therefore, perfecting, completing, fulfilling was through the Levitical priesthood, [for on the basis of it the people received the Torah[H]], what further need was there for another priest to arise according to the order, arrangement, type of Melkiy Tzedek[H], and not be designated according to the order, arrangement, type of Aharon[H]? “If therefore, perfecting, completing, fulfilling was through the Levitical priesthood, [for on the basis of it the people received the Torah[H]]…” The priesthood which the Torah instructs as mediator of temporal sacrificial symbols offered in the blood of animals, could not perfect sin affected people because the indictment of Torah served to point out humanity’s inability to keep its instruction. Therefore, neither the Torah nor the Levitical priesthood it commanded could bring humanity into a perfect relationship with our Creator, Whom we have sinned against. Our sin separating us from Him. “But your iniquities have separated you from your God; And your sins have hidden His face from you, So that He will not hear.” -Isaiah 59:2 NKJV “what further need was there for another priest to arise according to the order, arrangement, type of Melkiy Tzedek?” This indicates that Yeshua is not Melkiy Tzedek, rather He is “another priest to arise according to the type of Melkiy Tzedek”. Where the Torah was made weak in application by our sinfulness, Messiah Yeshua overcame in sinless perfection, arising as the perfector and finisher of faith. The Superior High Priest. 12 For when the priesthood is translated, it is necessary that there takes place a translation of Torah[H] also. “When the priesthood is translated, it is necessary that there takes place a translation of the Torah also.” The immutable aspects of Torah never change, while the aspects of Torah governing indictment against sin will pass away in the Olam Haba (world to come) where there will be no sin and therefore, no need for indictment. Thus, the priesthood of Messiah Yeshua which is like the priesthood of Melkiy Tzedek, translates the Torah into the language of eternity, making an end to temporal things and imparting everlasting things. As I explained in my commentary on chapter 5 the Aaronic priesthood was conferred onto Yeshua by Yochanan the Immerser. Another way of saying this is that through the immersion of Yeshua the priesthood of Aaron is translated into the priesthood of Yeshua, which is like that of Melkiy Tzedek. We note that there is a convergent nature to the priesthood of Yeshua. He unifies the two priesthoods of Melkiy Tzedek and Aaron, which are both in fact everlasting in Him. Given that Pinchas the grandson of Aaron was promised an everlasting priesthood: “And he (Pinchas) shall have it (the priesthood), and his seed after him, the covenant of an everlasting priesthood; because he was zealous for his God, and made an atonement for the children of Israel.” -Numbers 25:13 KJV This is why we must understand “change” metatithēmi[G] in the sense of translation from one form to another rather than an end to the one by the other. 13 For the one about whom these things are said belongs (metechō[G]) to another tribe (phulē[G]), from which no one has officiated at the altar (thusiastērion[G], hamizbeakh[H]). 14 For it is evident that our Lord (kurios[G], Adoneiynu[H]) is descended from Yehudah[H] (praise), a tribe with reference to which Moshe[H] (drawn our one) said nothing concerning priesthood (hierōsunē[G], hakehunah[H]). 13 For the one about whom these things are said belongs to another tribe, from which no one has officiated at the altar. 14 For it is evident that our Lord is descended from Yehudah[H], a tribe with reference to which Moshe[H] said nothing concerning priesthood. “The one about whom these things are said” refers to Yeshua, Who is the One that the writer’s drash (comparative teaching) is pointing to. The nearest subject in relation to perpetual priesthood is “another priest to arise” (v.11), a reference to Yeshua. “Belongs to another tribe” Is not a Levite. Yeshua is descended of Judah, of David (Gen. 49:10). There is nothing explicitly commanded by Moses concerning anyone from Judah serving as a priest. However, as explained in my commentary on Hebrews 5, Yochanan the Immerser does confer the priesthood of Aaron upon Yeshua at His immersion (baptism). 15 And this is clearer still (katadēlos[G]), if another priest (hiereus[G] kohen[H]) arises according to the likeness (homoiotēs[G]) of Melkiy Tzedek[H], 16 who has become a priest not on the basis of a law (nomos[G]) of physical (ethnic) requirement (sarkikos[G]), but according to the miraculous power (dunamis[G]) of an indestructible, endless, insoluble life (akatalutos zoe[G], lechayeiy eiyn sof[H]). 17 For it is attested of Him, “You are a priest (hiereus[G], Kohen[H]) forever (eis aion [G], leolam[H]) According (kata[G]) to the order, arrangement, fashion, style (taxis[G]) of Melkiy-tzedek[H] (My king of righteousness).” [Ps. 110:4 (109:4 LXX)] 15 And this is clearer still, if another priest arises according to the likeness of Melkiy Tzedek[H], 16 who has become a priest not on the basis of a law of physical (ethnic) requirement, but according to the miraculous power of an indestructible, endless, insoluble life. 17 For it is attested of Him, “You are a priest forever According to the order, arrangement, fashion, style of Melkiy-tzedek[H].” [Ps. 110:4 (109:4 LXX)] The subject is Yeshua, Who is “another priest” (like but not Melkiy Tzedek). Yeshua has become priest not on the basis of the Torah requirement of Levitical lineage but based on the fact that He is all existing, of God, affirmed by oath (and His miraculous indestructible life as the Father with us). Thus, “a Priest forever”. 18 For, on the one hand, there is putting away (athetēsis[G]) of a former commandment (entolē[G]) because of its weakness (asthenēs[G]) and unprofitableness (anōpheles[G]) 19 (for the Torah[H] [namusa[A]: instruction] made nothing perfect [teleioō[G]]); but the introducing of a better (kreittōn[G]) hope, Good news (elpis[G], tikvah[H], sebar[A]), through which we draw near (eggizō[G]) to God. (Theos[G], HaElohiym[H]) 20 And accordingly not without an oath 18 For, on the one hand, there is putting away of a former commandment because of its weakness and unprofitableness 19 (for the Torah[H] made nothing perfect); but the introducing of a better hope, through which we draw near to God. 20 And accordingly not without an oath “there is putting away of a former commandment because of its weakness…” The commandment concerning the mortal priesthood and its symbolic sacrificial system is made weak by the evil inclination of humanity. In short, our inability to perfect it makes it weak. The commandment itself serves its purpose by exposing our sinful weakness. “for the Torah[H] made nothing perfect” Because the purpose of Torah is to point to the perfector Yeshua the King Messiah. The Torah indicts against sin, Messiah delivers from sin. The Torah continues to serve its purpose until the end of the age, and Messiah continues to purpose salvation unto everlasting life. The Torah is not eternal, how could it be? There will be no need for an indictment against sin in the sinless Olam Haba (world to come). Only the knowledge of good will remain, we will therefore, have no need of instruction against evil. If there is an eternal Torah, it is devoid of the confines of mitzvot (commands). Freedom has no need of fences. One who knows only to do good need not be told to do it, everything he does is good. “For what the Torah was powerless to do because it was weakened by the flesh, God did by sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh to be a sin offering. And so he condemned sin in the flesh,” -Romans 8:3 It’s important to affirm the goodness and holiness of Torah. The Brit HaChadashah (New Testament) writers honour the place of Torah as that which is (not was) holy and good and points to the King Messiah, its goal. “So then, the Torah is holy, and the commandment is holy and righteous and good.” -Romans 7:12 TLV “For Messiah is the goal of the Torah, the means of righteousness for all who believe.” -Romans 10:4 (YBYP) Ultimately, it is a mistake to focus on Torah observance. Torah is a sign pointing to Messiah, Who authored it, and is the goal of it [Rom. 10:4]. If Messiah lives in you, then His work is manifest in your actions by the power of God's Spirit. One who lives by the Spirit need not debate the keeping of Torah, because “the Torah of the Spirit of life has set you free in Messiah Yeshua from the Torah of sin and death.” [Rav Shaul's letter to the Roman Believers 8:2] 21 for they indeed became priests (hiereus[G], lekoheniym[H]) without an oath (horkōmosia[G]), but He with an oath through the One who said to Him, “HaShem (YHVH: Mercy) has sworn And will not change His mind, ‘You are a priest (Kohen[H]) forever (leolam[H])’”; 22 by the same extent Yeshua[H] also has become the guarantee (egguos[G]) of a better covenant (diathēkē[G], labrit hatovah[H]), . 23 The former priests (hiereus[G], koheniym[H]), on the one hand, existed in greater numbers because they were prevented by death (thanatos[G], hamavet[H]) from continuing; 24 Yeshua[H], on the other hand, because He continues, abides, dwells, remains (menō[G]) forever, has an immutable, unchanging (aparabatos[G]) priesthood (hierōsunē[G], kehunato[H]). 21 (for they indeed became priests without an oath, but He with an oath through the One who said to Him, “HaShem (YHVH: Mercy) has sworn And will not change His mind, ‘You are a priest forever’”); The priesthood of Aaron was instructed whereas the priesthood of Yeshua is bound by an everlasting oath which God made by His Own Soul. “Will not change His mind” translates as “will not turn His mind” in another direction. This must be understood in accordance with the best commentary that can be made on Biblical text, that being Biblical text: “15 Brothers and sisters, I speak after the manner of human beings; Though it be but a man's covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man voids it, or adds to it. 16 Now to Abraham and his seed the promises were made. He does not say, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Messiah. 17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Messiah, was four hundred and thirty years after the Torah, which cannot void it, that it should make the promise of none effect. 18 For if the inheritance be of the Torah, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.” -Galatians 3:15-18 “13 For when God made a promise to Avraham, since He could swear an oath by no one greater, He swore by Himself, on His own soul, 14 saying, “indeed, for blessing I will bless you and multiplying I will multiply you [your seed/progeny].” [ Gen. 22:17] 15 And so, having patiently waited in his spirit, he obtained the promise. 16 For indeed people swear an oath by one greater, and taking an oath serves as confirmation to them, an end of all strife, dispute, contradiction between them. 17 In the same way God, desiring more abundantly to demonstrate to the heirs of the promise the fact that His purpose is immutable, unchangeable, confirmed it with an oath, 18 so that by two immutable, unchangeable things in which it is impossible for God to lie, we might have strong comfort who have fled for refuge to take hold of the hope set before us. 19 This hope we have as an anchor of the soul, a hope both certain, loyal and forceful, reliable and one which enters into the house the parochet inner veil [the veil hung before the holy of holies], 20 where Yeshua has entered as a forerunner for us, having become a high priest forever according to the word, order, type, style, arrangement of Melkiy Tzedek.” -Hebrews 6:13-20 (Author’s translation) 22 by the same extent Yeshua[H] also has become the guarantee of a better covenant. “better covenant” The Brit HaChadashah, New Covenant in Yeshua is better because it atones forever, saving unto eternal life those who enter into it, unlike the temporary blood of animals which cannot fully purge sin from the human soul. We note that the better covenant is made with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, the ethnic religious descendants of Jacob and is accessible to the nations through the Jew Yeshua Who is also God with us. Failing to understand the Brit HaChadashah, New Covenant in these terms leads to the satanic teaching of Replacement Theologies which the modern Christian Church continues to proliferate under various pseudonyms such as “Supersessionism, Continuationism, Successionism” etc. “‘The days are coming,’ declares the Lord, ‘when I will make a new covenant with the people of Israel and with the people of Judah.’” -Jeremiah 31:31 NIV This covenant promised by God through Jeremiah does not do away with the former covenant but fully fills it. Just as it is wrong to say Torah observance is obligatory for the Messiah follower, it is also wrong to say that Torah is now obsolete. Torah remains to indict against sin until the end of the age. 23 The former priests, on the one hand, existed in greater numbers because they were prevented by death from continuing; 24 Yeshua[H], on the other hand, because He continues, abides, dwells, remains forever, has an immutable, unchanging priesthood. Notice that this all concerns Yeshua’s priesthood which has always existed in God. And that His priesthood, while likened to that of the mortal Melkiy Tzedek, is nonetheless distinguished from it as being superior to it. Immutable, unchanging. 25 Therefore, He is also able (dunamai[G]) to save to the full end, perfectly, forever (pantelēs[G], lehushiya teshuat[H]) those who come to God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]) through Him, since He always lives (zao[G], chay[H]) to make intercession (entugchanō[G]) for them. 26 For it was fitting for us to have such a high priest (archiereus[G], Kohen Gadol[H]), holy (hosios[G], kadosh[H]), innocent (akakos[G]), undefiled (amiantos[G]), separated (chōrizō[G]) from sinners (hamartōlos[G]), and made (ginomai[G]) higher (hupsēlos[G]) than the heavens (Ouranos[G], hashamayim[H]); 25 Therefore, He is also able to save to the full end, perfectly, forever those who come to God through Him, since He always lives to make intercession for them. “Therefore will I divide Him a portion with the great, and He shall divide the spoil with the strong; because He has poured out His soul unto death: and He was numbered with the transgressors; and He bare the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.” -Isaiah 53:12 26 For it was fitting for us to have such a high priest, holy, innocent, undefiled, separated from sinners, and made higher than the heavens; “He who descended is the very one who ascended higher than all the heavens, in order to fill the whole universe.” -Ephesians 4:10 NIV “For what the Torah could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:” -Romans 8:3 27 who does not need to offer sacrifices daily (kata hēmera[G], yom yom[H]), like those high priests (archiereus[G], koheniym gedoliym[H]), first for His own sins [missing the mark set by God’s holiness] (hamartia[G]) and then for the sins of the people (laos[G], ha’am[H]), because He did this once for all (ephapax[G]) when He offered up (anapherō[G]) His soul (nafsho[H]). 28 For the Torah[H] appoints men as high priests (archiereus[G], koheniym gedoliym[H]) who are infirm, weak (astheneia[G]), but the word, essence, substance (logos[G], devar[H]) of the oath (horkōmosia[G]), which came after the Torah[H], appoints a Son (uihos[G], haben[H]), who has been made consecrated (teleioō[G], na’aleh[H]) forever (eis aion[G], bishleimot netzakh[H]). 27 who does not need to offer sacrifices daily, like those high priests, first for His own sins [missing the mark set by God’s holiness] and then for the sins of the people, because He did this once for all when He offered up His soul. “15 For we do not have a high priest Who is unable to sympathize, have compassion with our weaknesses, but One who has been tempted, tried, examined, proved in all things just as we are, yet without sin [missing the mark set by God’s holiness].” -Hebrews 4:15 (Author’s translation) 28 For the Torah[H] appoints men as high priests who are infirm, weak, but the word, essence, substance of the oath, which came after the Torah[H], appoints a Son, who has been made consecrated forever. The oath in Psalms 110:4 was spoken by David in the Holy Spirit centuries after the giving of the Torah at Sinay, and appoints a Son who has been consecrated as an everlasting Priest. The Word (logos[G]/Davar[H]) of the oath and the Son appointed are one and the same. The Word Who came after the Torah in chronology (time and space) is also the Author of the Torah. He is all existing. NB: For an explanation of the order of Melkiy Tzedek’s priesthood and why Melkiy Tzedek is not Yeshua, please read my commentary on Hebrews 5. Copyright 2021 Yaakov Brown Verses 4 to 6 are often used in support of the false idea that one can lose salvation. That is not the case. If it were, salvation, reliant on Yeshua, would be unreliable, thus impugning God’s character. In fact, what verses 4 to 6 teach, is that experiential faith is not true faith. Introduction:
Yeshua was introduced as Kohen HaGadol at 2:17 and the writer of Hebrews has explained Yeshua’s role in likeness to that of Melkiy Tzedek the ancient priest of Salem in a drash (comparative teaching) begun in chapter 4 and expanded in chapter 5. In preparation for further explanation regarding the priesthood of Messiah as it relates to the priesthood of Melkiy Tzedek, the writer now continues this exposition of Psalms 110:4 (Heb. 4:14-7:28) in chapter 6, first with a warning against experiential faith and then explaining God’s immutably reliable promise and oath to Abraham as an example of His trustworthiness in relationship to salvation through Yeshua the Great High Priest of an everlasting atonement. It’s important to understand that what is taught in this chapter regarding those who have experienced the gifts of God’s redemptive purpose and even partnered with the Holy Spirit, but have nonetheless failed to enter regenerative faith (are not true disciples) in Yeshua, is taught as a warning and not as a foregone conclusion. As is the case with all Scripture (scrolls of the original texts), there are no chapter breaks or verse markers (or punctuation for that matter) in the scroll of the Book to the Hebrews. It’s important to see the text of this chapter as a continuation of the previous chapter, the last verses of chapter 5 being: 13 For everyone individually and collectively who partakes of milk is unskilful, inexperienced, ignorant, has no knowledge in the word, essence of righteousness, for that one is an infant. [cf. Isa. 7:15; re. Messiah to the contrary: His spiritual maturity exceeded His physical growth] 14 But strong food, oiled bread [fat bread] is for the mature, who by reason have their senses, perception vigorously trained, exercised, their hearts, core being, inner person, examined to distinguish, discern between good and evil. BOOK TO THE HEBREWS Chapter 6 (Author’s translation) 1Therefore, upon what’s been said, leaving, turning from the beginning, cornerstones, foundation stones of the word, essences, instructions of the Messiah, let us bring, go up to maturity, not laying, returning again (to) a foundation of repentance, turning around, change of mind, from dead corpse-like works and of faith, belief, assurance, trust toward, on God, 2 of instructions, doctrines, taught things about immersions, washings, baptisms and laying on of hands, and about the resurrection of the dead and judgment, damnation, condemnation everlasting, in perpetual world. 3 And this we will do, if God allows, permits, gives licence. 4 For it is impotent, weak in the case of those who have once been enlightened, illuminated, seen the light [alt. have already lifted up their eyes to the light: alt. #2 have descended to immersion[A]], and have tasted, eaten of the heavenly gift and have been made partakers, partners of the Holy Spirit, 5 and have tasted, eaten the good breathed word of God and the powers, miracles of the world to come, 6 If they also then fall away, to renew them again to repentance, returning, because they again crucify to themselves the Son of God and put Him to public shame. 7 For the land that drinks the rain which often falls on it, and produces herbs/vegetation of good seed useful to those who farm it, receives a spoken blessing from God; 8 but if it bears thorns and thistles, it is castaway, worthless, rejected and very close to being cursed, and its end is in being burned. 9 But now, dear ones/beloved, we are persuaded, convinced, trusting of better things regarding you, and things possessed in salvation, even though we must speak in this way. 10 For God is not unjust, unrighteous so as to forget your work and labour of charitable holistic love which you have shown toward His Name, in that you have served, ministered to the holy [set apart] ones and continue to serve today. 11 And we desire that every one of you show the same diligence, forwardness, urgency so as to realize the full confidence of faith, trust, hope until the goal, 12 so that you will not be dull, stupid, sluggish, lazy but followers, imitators, walking in the way of those who through faith, belief, assurance, fidelity, trust and patience, endurance, perseverance, in their spirit inherit the promises. 13 For when God made a promise to Avraham, since He could swear an oath by no one greater, He swore by Himself, on His own soul, 14 saying, “indeed, for blessing I will bless you and multiplying I will multiply you [your seed/progeny].” [ Gen. 22:17] 15 And so, having patiently waited in his spirit, he obtained the promise. 16 For indeed people swear an oath by one greater, and taking an oath serves as confirmation to them, an end of all strife, dispute, contradiction between them. 17 In the same way God, desiring more abundantly to demonstrate to the heirs of the promise the fact that His purpose is immutable, unchangeable, confirmed it with an oath, 18 so that by two immutable, unchangeable things in which it is impossible for God to lie, we might have strong comfort who have fled for refuge to take hold of the hope set before us. 19 This hope we have as an anchor of the soul, a hope both certain, loyal and forceful, reliable and one which enters into the house the parochet inner veil [the veil hung before the holy of holies], 20 where Yeshua has entered as a forerunner for us, having become a high priest forever according to the word, order, type, style, arrangement of Melkiy Tzedek. HEBREWS 6 (line upon line) 1Therefore, upon what’s been said (al kein[H]) leaving, turning from (aphiēmi[G], mei’avneiy pinah[H]) the beginning, cornerstones, foundation stones (arche[G]) of the word, essences, instructions (logos[G], davar[H], alt. betorat[H]) of the Messiah (Christos[G], ha-Mashiyach[H]), let us bring, go up (pherō̄[G], vena’aleh[H]) to maturity (teleiotēs[G], ad-tachliyta[H]), not (velo[H]) laying, returning (kataballō[G], nashuv[H]) again (to) a foundation (themelios[G], et-hatsod[H]) of repentance, turning around, change of mind (metanoia[G], liteshuvah[H]), from dead corpse-like (nekros[G]) works (ergon[G], min-ma’asiym asher mavet[H]) and of faith, belief, assurance, trust (pistis[G], emunat[H]) toward, on (epi[G]) God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]), 2 of instructions, doctrines, taught things (didachē[G], diyn[H]) about immersions, washings, baptisms (baptismos[G], hateviylot[H]) and laying on (epithesis[G], smiychat[H]) of hands (cheir[G], yadayim[H]), and about the resurrection (anastasis[G], utekumat[H]) of the dead (nekros[G], hameitiym[H]) and judgment, damnation, condemnation (krima[G], umishpat[H]) everlasting, in perpetual world (aiōnios[G], olam[H]). 3 And this we will do, if God allows, permits, gives, licences (Theos epitrepō[G], birtzot haEl[H]). Within the first two verses of this chapter, six foundational doctrines are alluded to: 1.Repentance – turning away from sin and toward God 2.Faith in God – the receipt of God and His sacrificial love in Yeshua by grace 3.Immersions – full immersion in the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, the consecration of the body of believers, individually and corporately as priests under the Great High Priest Yeshua 4.Laying on of hands – the conferring and imparting of authority in Messiah, of God 5.Resurrection of the dead – the resurrection of all who have passed at the end of the present sin affected world/age 6.Eternal Judgement/Punishment – the destiny of all who refuse God’s offer of redemptive, vicarious, sacrificial love The foundational doctrines of our faith community, which are for both Jewish believers and are given via Jewish believers to Gentiles (so that all believers have access to them), are established not in the writings of so called Gentile “Church Fathers”, but in the writings of the true fathers of the body of believers (Jews), appointed by God and inspired by the Holy Spirit. We do not base our core beliefs and doctrines on the Nicene creeds of Christendom but on the Scriptures (Genesis to Revelation). As I have stated many times, prior to the Hellenization of the known world (323-33 B.C.E) there was no word in the Hebrew language for “theology”. In short, Biblical Judaism teaches faith in action, it is not creedal but functional (to our shame as Jews, post temple Rabbinical Judaism eventually developed into a creedal religion in a polemic attempt to stem the influence of Christianity). 1Therefore, upon what’s been said, leaving, turning from the beginning, cornerstones, foundation stones of the word, essences, instructions of the Messiah, let us bring, go up to maturity, not laying, returning again (to) a foundation of repentance, turning around, change of mind, from dead corpse-like works and of faith, belief, assurance, trust toward, on God, This verse sets up the context for the subsequent verses of admonishment regarding experiential faith (v.4 – 8). The writer is essentially saying that there is no need for someone who has genuinely received Yeshua and is living according to repentance to return to a fundamental understanding of salvation because that person already has the understanding required to form a foundation for maturity. “Therefore” Because the ability to distinguish between good and evil requires a believer to walk in the discipline of maturity (5:13-14). “leaving foundational instruction of the Messiah” Moving forward, not leaving behind. Note that it is, teaching concerning the Messiah that is at the heart of maturity. Therefore, the milk is important, and a beginning, but must be added to with strong food unto maturity. “let us go up” Is from the Hebrew translation and denotes making Aliyah, going up to Jerusalem for one of the regaliym (three aliyot, or going up moediym appointed times/festivals: Pesach, Shavuot, and Sukkot)[The three “P”s: Passover, Pentecost and Pup-tents]. In short, rather than returning to a base understanding of what it means to be part of the believing community, let’s instead celebrate the festivals of the mature, delighting in the learning gleaned from a rhythm of righteous action set out and fuelled by God for our good. “not laying again a foundation of repentance” If we have truly repented and are walking in repentance, what need do we have of repenting? Except if we are not truly saved. Therefore, the writer is speaking a warning to those among the believing Jewish community who walk in pretentious experiential faith (some being self-deluded and in need of a wakeup call, others wilfully rebellious and in need of the life changing regeneration of Yeshua’s saving work). “and of faith on God” Faith is a living and ongoing relational journey and not a time trapped decision or benign act of mental assent. 2 of instructions, doctrines, taught things about immersions, washings, baptisms and laying on of hands, and about the resurrection of the dead and judgment, damnation, condemnation everlasting, in perpetual world. “Immersions, washings” This refers to the ritual washing of tevilah ba’mikveh (immersion in the ritual washing pool or other living water source), the washing of priests through ritual consecration in preparation for offerings made before the face of God, the immersion of Yochanan the Immerser (John the Baptist), the immersion of Yeshua’s disciples, the immersion of the Holy Spirit, which began at Shavuot[H] (Pentecost[G]), and the trifold immersion commanded by Yeshua, which unites all immersions from the mikveh (gathering of waters) at creation, to the mikveh of Noah (saved through the flood waters), to the mikveh of the Red Sea (Israel’s immersion unto freedom), to the mikveh of the Jordan (Israel’s immersion unto the promised land: a shadow of the eternal land), to all the aforementioned mikvot and unto the fullness of their prophetic goal in Messiah’s life, death and resurrection. The fullness of Yeshua’s mikvot (immersions, washings) are understood as foundational to true faith. Therefore, the mikveh (immersion) of Yeshua incorporates all immersions and consecrates the believer as a priest under Yeshua immersed in the Godhead (1 Peter 2:9 [note that in the context of 1 Peter 2:9 Peter is speaking to Jewish believers, just as the writer of the book to the Hebrews is here]). “Laying on of hands” is a Hebraic (Jewish) idiom that denotes the appointing or passing on of authority. It is seen in action in relation to immersion and the gift of the Holy Spirit (Acts 8:16-17; 19:5-6), where the laying of hands is symbolic, while the Spirit is given of God. It is important to note that the one who lays hands is not giving the gift of the Holy Spirit (a blasphemous notion) but that the laying of hands is a symbol of the conferring of authority. Thus, a child of God is given the Holy Spirit as a sign of authority in Messiah unto God. Laying on of hands is seen in the commissioning and ordaining of kingdom workers (Acts 6:6; 13:3; 1 Tim. 4:14; 5:22; 2 Tim. 1:6), in the healing of the sick (Mk. 6:5; 16:18; Lk. 4:40; Acts 28:8), and in the imparting of blessing (Matt. 19:13-15). On all of these occasions the conferring or imparting of authority is the primary meaning, which is then outworked by the power of God in the life of the believer. “resurrection of the dead” Yeshua, the Perushiym (Pharisees) [Mishnah Sot. 9:15; Mishnah San. 10:1], and the first century Messianic Jews all accepted the resurrection of the dead at the end of the age unto judgement, as foundational doctrine. There is no need to relearn immutable things. They are firmly established. “judgement/punishment everlasting” Eternal punishment is not to be questioned. Those who question its reality prove themselves unbelievers and apostate. This is a harsh indictment on the first century Jewish believing community but it is an even harsher indictment on the modern western church, which has become saturated in the false doctrines of “Temporal punishment”, “salvation after death”, “annihilationism” and numerous other satanic lies. Eternal judgement (meaning that the consequences of Gods final judgement are eternal both with regard to life and to death) was a commonly accepted doctrine of Biblical and first century Judaism, and remains so in the true remnant among Messianic Jews (Isa. 66:22-24; Ezek. 34:17-22; Dan. 7:26; 12:1-2; Ezra. 7:33-44; Matt. 218:6-9; 5:31-46; Mark. 9:42-48; Rom. 2:7; 2 Thess. 1:5-10; Jude 7; 13; Rev. 14:9-11; 20:10, 14-15). Eternal punishment is not the same as the temporal punishment of Gehenna (Mishnah Qidd. 14:4; Mishnah Ed. 2:10; Mishnah Avot 1:5; 5:19-20). Gehenna is that part of sheol (holding place of the departed) where the wicked await the final resurrection and judgement, after which they are thrown into the lake of perpetual fire prepared for the Devil and his angels (Rev. 20:10, 14-15). The confusion many have with regard to eternal punishment is based on a misunderstanding between temporal punishment (Gehenna) and eternal punishment (lake of fire), both of which are taught in Scripture, the latter being the ultimate destination of the unsaved. 3 And this we will do, if God allows, permits, gives licence. Our maturity is entirely reliant on God. We receive it and in His strength walk in it. Immaturity is the product of both the misbelief that we can earn God’s favour, and its counterpart, the misbelief that we have no need of God’s favour. Both are idolatry. What Verses 4 to 6 Teach: Verses 4 to 6 are often used in support of the false idea that one can lose salvation. That is not the case. If it were, salvation, reliant on Yeshua, would be unreliable, thus impugning God’s character. In fact, what verses 4 to 6 teach, is that experiential faith is not true faith. That those who may have appeared to have been true disciples can at times be proven to be pretenders (knowingly or unknowingly [self-deluded]). The warning of these verses is subsequent to and based on the warning connected to the disbelieving generation of Israelites alluded to in Hebrews 3:7- 4:13. It is a warning to those who profess faith but whose apostacy proves they have no such faith (cf. 1 John 2:19). If one has turned against the light he has supposedly received he has convinced himself that the light was false. Anyone, who having met Yeshua the Light of the world can at a later date say that Yeshua is not God with us, has by the evidence of his admission, not received Yeshua, and therefore, has never been a true disciple. In other words, the Light they claim to have received they have never known. Allowing one’s self to be temporarily influenced by faith in Yeshua is not the same as entering an eternal faith relationship in Yeshua. The former attaches faith to a fallen human lifestyle, like a fashion accessory that is purchased to match a certain outfit, and is subsequently tossed away when the outfit is no longer fashionable. The latter submits the human soul to God in Yeshua, recognising His rule over every part of existence. What is clear is that these verses warn any among the body of first century Jewish believers who are not genuine disciples, of the danger facing them if they do not repent and walk in true faith. The cutting off of such apostates reflects the ancient Jewish “karet” (cut off) punishment where certain violations of Torah such as idolatry, incest etc. result in exclusion from the community (Ex. 12:15, 19; Lev. 18:29; 20:3; 23:29). There is a similar halakhah taught by Rav Shaul and based on the Torah is conveyed to all believers, with regard to the incestuous sexually immoral brother: “Cut off the evil person from among yourselves!” -1 Corinthians 5:13 (Deut. 13:5; 17:7; 19:19; 21:21; 22:21,24; 24:7) Rav Shaul speaks in a similar way in his first letter to Timothy: “19 holding on to faith and a good conscience, which some have rejected and so have suffered shipwreck with regard to the faith. 20 Among them are Hymenaeus and Alexander, whom I have handed over to Satan to be taught not to blaspheme.” -1 Timothy 1:19-20 In the case of the Messianic community “karet” is intended to produce suffering unto repentance. “The Lord disciplines the ones He loves” (Psa. 94:12, 118:18; Prov. 3:12; Jer. 30:11, 46:28; Heb. 12:6). 4 For it is impotent, weak (adunatos[G]) in the case of those who have once been enlightened, illuminated, seen the light [alt. have already lifted up their eyes to the light: alt. #2 have descended to immersion[A]] (phōtizō[G], oru eiyneiyhem[H]), and have tasted, eaten (geuomai[G]) of the heavenly (ho epouranios[G], shamayim[H]) gift (dōrea[G], matan[H]) and have been made (ginomai[G]) partakers, partners (metochos[G]) of the Holy (hagios[G]) Spirit (pneuma[G], Ruach HaKodesh[H]), 5 and have tasted, eaten (geuomai[G]) the good (kalos[G], hatov[H]) breathed word (rhema[G], et devar[H]) of God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]) and the powers, miracles (dunamis[G], nifleot[H]) of the world to come (aiōn mellō[G], haolam heatiyd[H]), 4 For it is impotent, weak in the case of those who have once been enlightened, illuminated, seen the light [alt. have already lifted up their eyes to the light: alt. #2 have descended to immersion[A]], and have tasted, eaten of the heavenly gift and have been made partakers, partners of the Holy Spirit, 5 and have tasted, eaten the good breathed word of God and the powers, miracles of the world to come, “Impossible” (NASB) is a poor, even misleading translation of the Greek adunatos. In the context of Hebrews 4 through 5, weak, infantile faith is being challenged. Therefore, “weak, impotent” both valid translations, better convey the contextual meaning of adunatos. Notice that those being spoken of have “seen the light, tasted, eaten, partaken, partnered” but have not continued. Nowhere here is it said that these ones have become disciples or appliers of the faith. Nor have their experiences of God caused them to practice faith. In reality this denotes a person who, like those alluded to in the mashal (parable) of the sower, has failed to grow, mature, fruit, and produce progeny (Matthew 13:1–23, Mark 4:1–20, Luke 8:4–15). Hearing, knowing (in an intellectual sense), tasting, consuming, even temporarily partnering with the Holy Spirit, are all experiential things. Even in the case of the Holy Spirit, one can experience His presence and manifest power and still decide not to continue to partner with Him. Feeling the Holy Spirit is not the same as the Holy Spirit indwelling a person. The Tanakh speaks of the Holy Spirit coming upon even faithless people like king Saul. Experiential or emotional faith is of no value in times of trouble, nor does it manifest lasting change. Essentially, the writer of the Book to the Hebrews, inspired by the Holy Spirit, is teaching that experiential faith (as it is manifest in the temporal sin affected world) is not true faith. Any modern believer who has experienced goosebumps at a corporate worship music event and on a separate occasion during a secular rock concert, has the common sense to realise that goosebumps are no more evidence of the Holy Spirit than a man’s physiological response to a woman’s body is evidence of love. Experience may be a part of faith but it is not synonymous with true faith. 6 If they also (kai[G]) then fall away (parapiptō[G]), to renew (anakainizō[G]) them again (palin[G]) to repentance, returning (metanoia[G], velashuv[H]), because (kiy[H]) they again crucify (anastauroō[G], hitzliyvu[H]) to themselves the Son of God (uihos Theos[G], Ben Elohiym[H]) and put Him to public shame (paradeigmatizō[G]). 7 For the land (gē[G], ha’aretz[H]) that drinks (pinō[G], hashotah[H]) the rain (huetos[G], et hageshem[H]) which often falls on it, and produces herbs/vegetation (botanē[G]) of good seed (zera tov[H]) useful to those who farm it (geōrgeō[G]), receives (metalambanō[G]) a spoken blessing (eulogia[G], verachah[H]) from God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]); 6 If they also then fall away, to renew them again to repentance, returning, because they again crucify to themselves the Son of God and put Him to public shame. It would be wrong to understand the present text as teaching loss of salvation. Note the qualifying phrase “If they also then fall away”, which is a warning and not a forgone conclusion. In reality it is teaching that those who have not repented genuinely in the first place, cannot return to repentance because they have entirely misunderstood what repentance is. By definition, if one needs to return to repentance he has clearly not repented (because true repentance is to turn and continue in the right direction) but considers he has (is self-deluded), how then can he repent (return)? “Because they again crucify to themselves the Son of God” This shows that they did not understand the work of Messiah’s crucifixion in the first place. The crucifixion of Messiah meant Him becoming a sin sacrifice on our behalf, having taken on Himself the sin (past, present and future) of the repentant. To fall away is to prove that our faith was based on nothing more than a shallow understanding, seeded in soil devoid of depth. 7 For the land that drinks the rain which often falls on it, and produces herbs/vegetation of good seed useful to those who farm it, receives a spoken blessing from God; Good seed produces good fruit. The rain represents the Word Yeshua, the Gospel, the Holy Spirit. The land represents the hearts of human beings (in the present context specifically Jews). The good seed here is not the Gospel as it is in Yeshua’s parable, rather it represents the truly regenerated Messiah follower. 8 but if it bears thorns (akantha[G]) and thistles (tribolos[G]), it is castaway, worthless, rejected (adokimos[G]) and very close (eggus[G]) to being cursed (katara[G]), and its end (telos[G]) is in being burned (kausis[G], l’vaeir[H]). 9 But now (de[G]), dear ones/beloved (agapētos[G], yediydiym[H]), we are persuaded, convinced, trusting (peithō[G]) of better things (kreittōn[G], devariym toviym[H]) regarding (peri[G]) you, and things possessed (echō[G]) in salvation (sōtēria[G], yeshuah[H]), even though we must speak (laleō[G]) in this way (houtō[G]). 8 but if it bears thorns and thistles, it is castaway, worthless, rejected and very close to being cursed, and its end is in being burned. Note that thorns and thistles are of different seed. The point here is that anyone who produces thorns and thistles is proven by their fruit to have never received the seed of faith in Yeshua in the first place. This therefore, does not teach loss of salvation but is proof of a lack of genuine salvation, which is received and walked in rather than agreed to and disregarded. The teaching of these verses identifies those who have had every opportunity to receive salvation through genuine faith but have instead merely pretended (sometimes even deluding themselves) to have entered into true faith. Thus, the seed of the sinful nature has not been replaced by the seed of faith in Messiah. These verses convey the teaching of Messiah: “If anyone does not remain in Me, he is like a branch that is thrown away and dries up; such branches are picked up and thrown into the fire and burned.” -Yochanan (John) 15:6 Notice the qualifying phrase “If anyone does not remain in Me”, which correlates to “if they also then fall away”. 9 But now, dear ones/beloved, we are persuaded, convinced, trusting of better things regarding you, and things possessed in salvation, even though we must speak in this way. These words affirm that the writer and those who lead the wider Jewish believing community with him, are aware that the majority among them are faithful disciples and that the warning is needed only for the few who have yet to show true repentance and the fruit of ongoing faith. 10 For God (Theos[G], Ha-Elohiym[H]) is not unjust, unrighteous (adikos[G]) so as to forget (epilanthanomai[G], yishkach[H]) your work (ergon[G]) and labour (kopos[G], amal[H]) of charitable holistic love (agapē[G], ahavatchem[H]) which you have shown toward His Name (onoma[G], lishmo[H]), in that you have served, ministered (diakoneō[G]) to the holy [set apart] ones (hagios[G], likdoshayv[H]) and continue to serve today (diakoneō[G], gam hayom[H]). 11 And we desire (epithumeō[G]) that every one of you (hekastos[G], iysh iysh[H]) show (endeiknumi[G]) the same diligence, forwardness, urgency (spoudē[G]) so as to realize the full confidence (plērophoria[G], ne’emanah[H]) of faith, trust, hope (elpis[G], tikvato[H]) until the goal (telos[G], ad haeitz[H]), 10 For God is not unjust, unrighteous so as to forget your work and labour of charitable holistic love which you have shown toward His Name, in that you have served, ministered to the holy [set apart] ones and continue to serve today. God’s nature is described as the foundation of the security of those who in true faith continue to minister in Yeshua. These ones are not those who are rebuked for experiential faith but are those who are true disciples. Notice the meaning of the now entirely misunderstood English word “saints”. Where many modern denominations venerate only certain individuals as “saints” (the greatest offenders being the Roman Catholic Church), Biblical Judaism understands “saints” as kedoshiym (holy, set apart ones). Throughout the Tanakh (OT) the phrase “My holy ones” has always referred to the righteous remnant of Israel (the ethnic descendants of Jacob). 11 And we desire that every one of you show the same diligence, forwardness, urgency so as to realize the full confidence of faith, trust, hope until the goal, “we desire” Reaffirms that the writer of the Book to the Hebrews is one of a group of Messianic Jewish leaders who are in agreement over the teaching of this work, and its application to the wider body of Jewish Messiah followers of the first century C.E. We note that the faithful are admonished to show diligent forward momentum in acting out their faith because that same living faith assures them of the certain hope they have in Messiah unto the goal of eternal life made manifest in the full revelation of the world to come (Olam haba). True faith could be likened to a hybrid vehicle, following the ignition of the fuel by the battery the motion of the vehicle recharges the battery and produces additional power in order to sustain travel to the destination. 12 so that you will not be dull, stupid, sluggish, lazy (nōthros[G]) but followers, imitators, walking in the way (mimētēs[G], im teilchun[H]) of those who through faith, belief, assurance, fidelity, trust (pistis[G], be’emunatam[H]) and patience, endurance, perseverance (makrothumia[G], veorekh[H]) in their spirit (rucham[H]) inherit (klēronomeō[G]) the promises (epaggelia[G], et hahavtachot[H]).13 For when God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]) made a promise (epaggellō[G], hivtiyach[H]) to Avraham[H] (Father of many peoples), since He could swear (omnuō[G], lehishavah[H]) an oath by no one greater (meizōn[G], eiyn gadol[H]), He swore (omnuō[G]) by Himself, on His own soul (heautou[G], nishba benafsho[H]), 12 so that you will not be dull, stupid, sluggish, lazy but followers, imitators, walking in the way of those who through faith, belief, assurance, fidelity, trust and patience, endurance, perseverance, in their spirit inherit the promises. Chapter 11 lists numerous examples of those who have lived lives of faith that reflect the faith being alluded to by the writer of the Book to the Hebrews. In the context of the Book to the Hebrews, the promises (plural) are those made to the Jewish people in and through Abraham, reaffirmed and conferred onto Isaac and Jacob. These promises include progeny, the land of Israel and eternal covenant (unto life everlasting) [Gen. 12:2-3; 15:5; 17:5]. The promises of God in Yeshua, like those made to the faithful ones of the past, are established for those who maintain faith in His strength. We note that affirmation of the promises (plural) precede the singling out of the promise of progeny used as an example in the next verse. 13 For when God made a promise to Avraham, since He could swear an oath by no one greater, He swore by Himself, on His own soul, As Creator of all, nothing and no one is superior to God. Thus, with regard to the human practice of swearing to one greater, God must be described as having sworn by Himself, because there is none greater. 14 saying (legō[G], vayomeir[H]), “indeed, for (e men[G], kiy[H]) blessing (eulogeō[G], bareikh[H]) I will bless (eulogeō[G], avarechecha[H]) you and multiplying (plēthunō[G], veharbah[H]) I will multiply (plēthunō[G], harbeh[H]) you [your seed/progeny].” [ Gen. 22:17] 15 And so, having patiently waited in his spirit (makrothumeō[G], rucho[H]), he obtained (epitugchanō[G]) the promise (epaggelia[G], et hahavtachah[H]). 16 For indeed (men[G], kiy amnam[H]) people (anthrōpos[G], anashiym[H]) swear (omnuō[G], hashvua[H]) an oath by one greater (meizōn[G], begadol[H]), and taking an oath serves as confirmation (bebaiōsis[G]) to them, an end (peras[G], yaviy keitz[H]) of all (pas[G], lekhol[H]) strife, dispute, contradiction (antilogia[G], riyv[H]) between them (beiyneiyhem[H]). 14 saying, “indeed, for blessing I will bless you and multiplying I will multiply you [your seed/progeny].” [ Gen. 22:17] 15 And so, having patiently waited in his spirit, he obtained the promise. 16 For indeed people swear an oath by one greater, and taking an oath serves as confirmation to them, an end of all strife, dispute, contradiction between them. “Indeed blessing I will bless you, and multiplying I will multiply your seed as the stars of the heavens and as the sand, which is on the seashore; and your seed shall possess the gate [place of governance] of their enemies.” -Bereishit (Genesis) 22:17 (Author’s translation from Hebrew text) This blessing spoken over Abraham is a beginning of blessings (plural) and must not be understood to be a reference to the limited blessing of progeny alone. 15 And so, having patiently waited in his spirit, he obtained the promise. With regard to the specific blessing of progeny Abraham waited 25 years to receive the promise (Gen. 12:3-4; 17:2; 18:10; 21:5). Thus, he “obtained” the promise of progeny through Isaac, whom Messiah redeemed, as prefigured in the Ram (Gen. 22). Thus, Jacob is redeemed by Messiah (the Ram of God) in the loins of Isaac. And with regard to the eternal covenant and the world to come Abraham died still holding on in faith to the yet to be seen reality of “a city which has foundations, whose builder and maker is God” (Heb. 11:10). Abraham exemplifies faithful trust in God, even faith unto death, a faith that prefigures that of Messiah chronologically speaking, and is established in Messiah before the foundation of the world, outside of time and space. 17 In the same way God (Theos[G], ha-Elohiym[H]), desiring (boulomai[G]) more abundantly (perissoteron[G]) to demonstrate (epideiknumi[G]) to the heirs (klēronomos[G], et yoresheiy[H]) of the promise (epaggelia[G], hahavtachah[H]) the fact that His purpose is immutable, unchangeable (ametathetos[G]), confirmed (mesiteuō[G]) it with an oath (horkos[G], bishvuato[H]), 18 so that by two immutable, unchangeable (ametathetos[G]) things in which it is impossible (adunatos[G]) for God (Theos[G], Ha-Elohiym[H]) to lie (pseudomai[G], lechazeiv[H]), we might have strong (ischuros[G], lehachaziyk[H]) comfort (paraklēsis[G]) who have fled for refuge (katapheugō[G]) to take hold (krateō[G]) of the hope (elpis[G], batikvah[H]) set before us (prokeimai[G]). 17 In the same way God, desiring more abundantly to demonstrate to the heirs of the promise the fact that His purpose is immutable, unchangeable, confirmed it with an oath, It’s important to note that the first century Jewish audience understands the heirs of the promise made to Abraham as being the Israelites, given that the promises made to Abraham were ratified through Isaac and Jacob and are seen to have been passed on to Jacob’s descendants in perpetuity. This does not mean that Gentiles have no access, but that Gentiles have access through Yeshua the Jew, just as Jews receive the fullness of the promises through Yeshua. 18 so that by two immutable, unchangeable things in which it is impossible for God to lie, we might have strong comfort who have fled for refuge to take hold of the hope set before us. Based on His nature God cannot lie. Therefore, the two things concerning Abraham a. the promise b. the oath, are immutable, unchangeable. These afford the faithful Jewish believers comfort, knowing that having fled the sinful ways of humanity, and the hypocrisy of vain religion, they have taken hold of a hope as certain as that of Abraham. 19 This hope we have as an anchor (agkura[G]) of the soul (psuchē[G], lenefesh[H]), a hope both certain, loyal (asphalēs[G], ne’eman[H]) and forceful, reliable (bebaios[G], vechazak[H]) and one which enters (eiserchomai[G]) into (eis[G]) the house (el mibeiyt[H]) the inner (esōteros[G]) veil [the veil hung before the holy of holies] (katapetasma[G], laparochet[H]), 20 where Yeshua[H] (Iēsous[G], Joshua, YHVH saves) has entered (eiserchomai[G]) as a forerunner (prodromos[G]) for us, having become a high priest (archiereus[G], lekohen gadol[H]) forever (eis aiōn[G], leolam[H]) according to the word, order, type, style, arrangement (taxis[G], al divratiy[H]) of Melkiy Tzedek[H] (My king of righteousness). 19 This hope we have as an anchor of the soul, a hope both certain, loyal and forceful, reliable and one which enters into the house the inner veil parochet[H] [the veil hung before the holy of holies], 20 where Yeshua has entered as a forerunner for us, having become a high priest forever according to the word, order, type, style, arrangement of Melkiy Tzedek. The hope that the believer has in Messiah Yeshua is like a strong anchor that holds a boat sure and secure in the midst of a storm. However, while a ship’s anchor is anchored in the rock of the sea floor, which will one day pass away, the anchor of our hope in Messiah finds purchase in the heavens upon the mercy seat of God (Who is the Rock of Israel) Who is immutable, unchanging. It is a certain hope that enters the Temple (house) and in Yeshua the Great High Priest (Lev. 16:2; Heb. 9:3) has access to the holy of holies beyond the parochet (curtain)[Ex. 26:31-35; Mk 15:38], because through His death and resurrection He has sprinkled His eternal blood upon the mercy seat of the heavenly ark and as God with us His Priesthood has made eternal atonement for those who have received Him. This being prefigured in the type of priesthood practiced by the ancient priest of Salem Melkiy Tzedek. “And Yeshua cried out again with a loud voice and yielded up His spirit. And behold, the parochet (curtain) of the temple was torn in two, from top to bottom…” -Matthew 27:50-51 Note that Yeshua’s Priesthood is likened in type to that of Melkiy Tzedek, but His practice is prefigured in the practice of the high priests of the Aaronic (Levitical) priesthood. Melkiy Tzedek the priest of Salem had no such temple or parochet (curtain). The temple, the curtain, and the holy of holies, are given to Israel as a shadow of the heavenly things. While it is clearly of great importance to understand Yeshua’s Priesthood as being over all people of faith regardless of ethnicity, it is nonetheless equally important to understand that the shadows pointing to His redemptive work are given to the chosen, ethnic, religious people of Israel the descendants of Jacob. I’m told, with some derision, that I am a zealot. Sobeit, I am zealous for HaShem in Yeshua, for His Scriptures, for my people Israel, and for the Gospel of freedom. It’s better to have angered the unteachable than to have said nothing and in so doing, stolen from the teachable. NB: For an explanation of the order of Melkiy Tzedek’s priesthood and why Melkiy Tzedek is not Yeshua, please read my commentary on Hebrews 5. Copyright 2021 Yaakov Brown |
Yaakov BrownFounder of the Beth Melekh International Messiah Following Jewish Community, Archives
February 2024
|