An Introduction to Amos & Study of Amos Chapter 1

Amos was a lay person and a manual labourer who prophesied in obedience to the call of Hashem. This encourages us to ask, “Have I allowed myself to be defined by my work, or am I owning my identity as a child of God, understanding that my vocation is the outworking of His redemptive purposes?” There is no such thing as an unqualified child of God.

Author (Human Writer):
 
According to the first verse of the scroll of Amos, Amos whose name means “Burden, load, carry”, prophesied over Israel during the reigns of Uziyah (My strength is YHVH) [king of Judah 792-740 BCE, a.k.a Azariyah 2 Kings 15:1] and Yeroboam II (People of contention) [king of the northern tribes 793-753 BCE].
 
The text tells us that Amos was a resident of Tekoa (Trumpet blast), a small town situated in the allotment of the tribal land of Judah 15 kilometers south of Beit-Lechem (House of Bread) [Bethlehem], and 27 kilometers from Yerushalaiym (Flood of Peace) [Jerusalem].
 
Amos, unlike his contemporaries, was not a professional prophet. Answering Amatziyahu the qualified (by way of appointment among the northern tribes), albeit apostate priest of Beiyt-El, Amos says:
 
“I wasn’t a prophet or the son of a prophet, but I was a sheep herder, and I also took care of fig trees. But Adonay (YHVH) took me from following the flock and said to me, ‘Go, prophesy to my people Israel.’” -Amos 7:14b-15 (Author’s translation)
 
Amos was a lay person and a manual labourer who prophesied in obedience to the call of Hashem. This encourages us to ask, “Have I allowed myself to be defined by my work, or am I owning my identity as a child of God, understanding that my vocation is the outworking of His redemptive purposes?” There is no such thing as an unqualified child of God.
 
Note that Adonay took Amos from following the flock (literal sheep) and positioned him to direct the flock (metaphorical sheep) of Israel.
 
Ministry:
 
The main part of the ministry of Amos is presumed by some to have taken place between 760 and 750 BCE, only 30 years before the Assyrian captivity of the northern kingdom (722-721 BCE). Amos, whose contemporaries were Hoshea (He saves) [Hosea], Yonah (Dove) [Jonah], and Yishayahu (YHVH, He has saved) [Isaiah], ministered to Israel at a time when both kingdoms were enjoying prosperity (2 Kings 14:23-15:7; 2 Chronicles 26). A time when both the northern tribes and, Y’hudah (Praise) [inclusive of Benyamin (Son of my right hand)] were practicing idolatry, immorality, injustice and oppression of the poor.
 
Rav Avraham Zacut*, and Rav David Ganz**, suggest that the ministry of Amos followed on from that of Hosea, and was prior to that of Isaiah. They say that Amos received (was taught) the Torah from Hosea, and Isaiah received (was taught) the Torah from Amos.
 
*Yuchasin, fol. 12. 1. **Tzemach David, fol. 13. 1. 2.
 
Although Amos was from Judah, he was sent by God to pronounce judgement on the northern kingdom (10 tribes) of Israel, and is likely to have ministered primarily out of Beit-El (House of God, Judge) [Bethel] (7:10-13 ref. Genesis 12:8). One of the main centers of apostate worship in the north.
 
It's interesting to note that three of Israel’s latter prophets, Joel, Jeremiah and Haggai all quote the prophet Amos (Amos 1:2-Joel 3:16; Amos 4:9-Jeremiah 25:30; Amos 9:13-Haggai 2:17 & Joel 3:18).
 
The Scroll:
 
The scroll of Amos is set during the period of divided monarchy when Bethel was used by the northern kingdom as a central location for cultic worship in direct contradiction to God’s instruction (the instruction to center all worship of Adonay in Jerusalem is found in Deut. 12:10).
 
The illegitimate worship rites conducted at Bethel are condemned by God through Amos. Thus, the primacy of Jerusalem is implied. Israel’s unique relationship to God and her position among the nations is emphasized (2:6-3:2; 9:7), and as is the case with numerous prophetic works of the Nevi’im (Prophets of Israel), moral living is given primacy over the offering of vain sacrifices.
 
With regard to modern rabbinical practice as it relates to the yearly Torah cycle, it’s worth noting that Amos 2:6-3:8 is the haftarah (completion/fulfilment of instruction) read alongside parashah (portion) Va-yeshev [And dwelt Jacob] (Gen. 37:1-40:23), and in Ashkenazi tradition Amos 9:7-15 is read as haftarah for parashah Acharei Mot [After the deaths] (Lev. 16:1-18:30). The former passage tells of Joseph being sold into slavery and the latter of the events following the deaths of Aron’s two sons after they had offered foreign fire before the Lord, that is fire of human origin or fire used for idolatrous worship. Both Torah portions have significant thematic connections to the scroll of Amos. However, a comparative study of the portions in question is beyond the scope of this introduction.
 
As is always the case we remember that the scrolls of Scripture in their original languages do not have chapter and verse divisions. While for scholarship reasons and ease of locational referencing, chapter and verse distinctions are of some value, and while we ourselves have chosen to teach the text using the commonly used divisions, it is nonetheless of great importance that we view the scroll of Amos as a whole document and do not become guilty of de-contextualizing it in order to promote preconceived modern notions based on the use of secular scholarship practices.
 
One modern example of a popular false conclusion adopted from the scroll of Amos relates to an oversimplification of justice by those who promote secular “social justice”, using it as a means for political gain. This form of “social justice” is based on a misreading and de-contextualizing of chapter 5 verse 24.
 
Such is the influence of the secular counterfeit of social justice upon both contemporary Jewish and Christian scholars, that some introductions to the book of Amos, citing 5:24 go so far as to say that “social justice” is the primary theme of this work. Frankly, that’s utter nonsense! Amos 5:24 does not diminish justice by confining it to one part of its whole (social justice), rather, within the context of the scroll of Amos justice in its fullness as an attribute of God is being taught. Thus, we read “Let justice roll on like a river…” and not, “Let social justice roll on like a river…” When we qualify the text of Scripture by insisting that it placate our modern political leanings, we disqualify ourselves as teachers of sound doctrine.
 
Themes:
 
Justice is one of the primary themes of the scroll of Amos, alongside repentance, righteousness and reconciliation.
 
The scroll begins with the pronouncement of God’s judgement against the nations, the last of whom are Judah and Israel God’s chosen people. Through Amos God calls for repentance and warns of the Day of the Lord. However, as is the case with many of the prophetic writings, a rhythm of blessing, rebuke, punishment, repentance and restoration once again shows that God’s mercy both precedes and is the result of His judgement. Thus, the scroll of Amos begins with blessing in the form of a warning (1:1-2) and ends with the promise of Israel’s redemption, reconciliation and restoration (9:11-15).
 
Names and Their Meanings:
 
It’s important to note that the people named in the text are historical figures and the towns and cities are historical locations, likewise the peoples named are historical peoples. In addition to this each proper noun has a meaning that denotes the prophetic outcomes being discussed. From before the beginning God saw the end of these people, peoples and places and forenamed them accordingly. God’s foresight does not negate human freewill. Human sight is limited to time and space while God’s sight is unlimited.
 
Amos 1 (Author’s translation)
 
1 Words of Amos, who was among the sheep herders from Tekoa, which he saw, perceived, beheld, prophesied upon Israel in the days of UziYah king of Y’hudah, and in the days of Yeroboam son of Yoash, king of Yisrael, two years before the shaking. 2 And he said, “The Lord from Zion will roar, and from Yerushalayim has set in place His voice; and there is mourning in the pastures of the shepherds’, and the head of Ha-Carmel withers, dries up.” 3 Thus, says the Lord: “Upon three rebellions of  Damascus, and upon four, I will not turn away, upon the threshing in the sledges of the iron specifically Ha-Gilead. 4 And I will send My fire into the house of Hazael and it will devour the citadels of Ben Hadad. 5  I will break the bar of Damascus, and I will cut off the inhabitant from the Valley of Aven, and he who holds a sceptre, from Beiyt Eden; and they will go into captivity, the people of Aram to Kiyrah,” says the Lord. 6 Thus, says the Lord: “Upon three rebellions of Gaza, and upon four, I will not turn away, upon them is the removal into captivity of those dwelling in peace to imprisonment to Edom. 7 And I will send My fire on the wall of Gaza and it will devour the citadels. 8 And I will cut off the inhabitant from Ashdod, and he who holds a sceptre, from Ashkelon; and I will turn My hand upon Ekron, and the remnant of the Philistines will perish,” says Adonay the LORD. 9 Thus, says the Lord: “Upon three rebellions of Tyre, and upon four, I will not turn away, upon the imprisonment of captivity of those dwelling in peace to Edom, and he did not remember a covenant of brothers. 10 And I will send My fire on the wall of Tyre, and it will devour the citadels.” 11 Thus, says the Lord: “Upon three rebellions of Edom, and upon four, I will not turn away, upon his pursuit of his brother with the sword and destroying his compassion; his anger also tears apart continually, and his wrath is guarded, kept maintained perpetually. 12 And I will send My fire on Teman and it will devour the citadels of Botzrah.” 13 Thus, says the Lord: “Upon three rebellions of the children of Amon, and upon four, I will not turn away, upon their ripping open the pregnant women of Gilead, in order to enlarge their territories. 14 And I will kindle My fire on the wall of Rabbah, and it will devour the citadels amid soundings of alarm on the day of battle, in a raging storm on the day of gale force winds. 15  Their king will go into captivity, he and his princes together,” says the Lord.
 
Amos 1. Line Upon Line:
 
1 Divreiy Words, essences, substances of Amos (Burden, load, carry), who was among va-nokediym the sheep herders (Heb. root. nakod: speckled, marked sheep & goats) from Tekoa (Trumpet blast), which he chazah saw, perceived, beheld, prophesied al upon Israel in the days of UziYah (My strength is YHVH) [Uzziah] king of Y’hudah (Praise) [Judah], and in the days of Yeroboam (People of contention) Jeroboam son of Yoash (YHVH’s fire) [Joash], king of Yisrael (overcome in Elohim/Judge/God) Israel, two years before ha-ra’ash the shaking (earthquake).
 
1 Words of Amos, who was among the sheep herders from Tekoa, which he saw, perceived, beheld, prophesied upon Israel in the days of UziYah king of Y’hudah, and in the days of Yeroboam son of Yoash, king of Yisrael, two years before the shaking (earthquake).
 
“Words of Amos”
 
A number of Jewish commentators suggest that Amos was named “Burden” due to an impediment of the tongue. His tongue being burdened, he stammered*. There are of course other prophetic characters of Scripture who suffered speech difficulties. Moses refers to himself as aral sefatayim “I am a man of impeded lips” (Ex. 6:12), and some of those who despised Rav Shaul (Paul the Apostle) said of him “His letters are weighty and strong, but in person he is unimpressive and his speech contemptible” (2 Cor. 10:10).
 
However, in seeking to understand the name of the prophet Amos we look to the context of his scroll which infers that his name relates to the “burden” of the LORD, a weight of God’s living words (divreiy)v.1. Words he could not keep from coming forth, like the fire in the belly of Jeremiah (Jer. 20:9).
 
*Vayikra Rabbah, sect. 10. fol. 153. 3. Abarbinel Praefat. in Ezek. fol. 253. 3.
 
“who was among the sheep herders from Tekoa”
 
Unlike the prophet Yishayahu (YHVH He is my Salvation) [Isaiah] who was a member of the royal court, and the prophet Yeremiyahu (Exalted by YHVH) [Jeremiah] who was a priest, Amos was a lowly herdsman (noked [sheep raiser 1:1, from nakod: speckled, marked], a boker [cattle herdsman 7:14, from bakar: enquire, seek, consider]) and an orchardist (a tender of figs)7:14.
 
It's possible that Amos was a wealthy man. The Hebrew noked is elsewhere translated “Sheep Master” (2 Kings 3:4), however, its meaning is elevated in 2 Kings by the fact that the person being spoken of is himself a king, Mesha the king of Moab.
 
Needless to say, Amos was a hardworking member of the am ha’aretz (common people of the land). Amos was called to prophecy, but it was not his profession. Among his contemporaries he was the country hick at the prophets’ guild meetings.
 
The home town of Amos, Tekoa shares its root (taka, “blow, sound”) with the verb tekiyah, the long blast sounded at the beginning and end of the shofar liturgy of Rosh Hashanah. This is a blast of the shofar that calls Israel to listen, hear, and gain understanding from God, and is followed by shevarim the wailing blasts of repentance. Teruah the 9 staccato blasts of alarm are next and precede the final blast of judgement tekiah gedolah (great long blast). Thus, the first tekiah blast points to the tekiah gedolah (great long blast) and final judgement. It is significant that the name of the home town of Amos denotes the calling and judgement of God announced by the tekiyah blast of the shofar. Amos is called of God to proclaim judgement against the nations, and against Judah and Israel. Following the rebuke to the nations he continues his scroll with a detailed rebuke of Israel and a call to repentance. He announces the judgement of God and concludes with a promise of future redemption and restoration.
 
It's worth noting that the Mishnah mentions Tekoa the home town of Amos as being famous for its olive oil production (Mishnah Menachot, c. 8. sect. 3.). Thus, there is a symbolic connection to the Ruach HaKodesh (Holy Spirit).
 
“He saw, perceived, beheld, prophesied upon Israel”
 
What Amos perceived of the Ruach HaKodesh (Holy Spirit) is prophesied “upon” Israel as an indictment that must be addressed. The “burden” or weight of the words of Amos will be heavy upon the people of Israel if they remain unrepentant, whereas in repentance the burden becomes light (9:11-15 ref. Matt. 11:28-30).
 
We note that although the scroll begins by pointing out that these words are spoken upon Israel, the prophet nonetheless starts by pronouncing judgement on the neighbouring nations. Ultimately God is concerned with the redemption of all peoples.
 
“Israel in the days of UziYah king of Y’hudah, and in the days of Yeroboam son of Yoash, king of Yisrael,”
 
At the time of his prophesying Jeroboam II (called Jeroboam son of Joash in order to distinguish him from Jeroboam son of Nebat) the northern king had been victorious in conquest and successful in accumulating riches. Thus, those over whom he reigned enjoyed prosperity and as a result of their comfort became inclined toward idolatry and depravity.
 
Both the kingdom of Judah under Uziyah (a.k.a Azariyah 2 Kings 15:1) and the northern kingdom under Yeroboam II, were idolatrous, prideful, rebellious, complacent, gluttonous, unjust and forgetful people. Through Amos God threatens discipline if they do not repent. In fact, knowing that they won’t repent God promises discipline and as a result of His sacrificial love, deliverance and restoration.
 
“two years before the shaking (earthquake).”
 
This earthquake was a memorable one and therefore anchors the prophecy to a certain period in Israel’s history prior to the captivity of the northern kingdom. Zechariah speaks of it many years later (520 BCE), explaining that the earthquake occurred in the days of Uziyah (Zechariah 14:5). Based on the chronology of the kings (2 Kings 14:23; 15:1), the earthquake would have had to have taken place in the earlier half of Uziyah’s reign and not as some suggest in the latter part of his reign when he attempted to enter the Temple and was struck with leprosy.
 
Interestingly Amos 9:1-6 can be understood as describing an earthquake. Throughout Scripture there is a connection between the shaking of the earth and the judgement of God (Exodus 19:18, Judges 5:4, 2 Samuel 22:8, Psalm 18:7, Psalm 68:8, Isaiah 14:16, Habakkuk 3:6, Matthew 27:51, Hebrews 12:26).
 
2 And he said, “YHVH (Mercy) The Lord mitziyon from Zion will roar, umiyerushalayim and from Jerusalem yitein has set in place kolu His voice; ve’avelu and there is mourning in the pastures of ha’roiym the shepherds’, and the rosh head (summit) of ha-carmel (garden, orchard) the Carmel veyaveish withers, dries up.” 3 Thus, says YHVH (Mercy) the Lord: “Al Upon sheloshah three pisheiy rebellions of Damesek (Silent sackcloth weaver) Damascus, ve'al and upon arba’ah four, lo ashiyvenu I will not turn away, al-dusham upon the threshing bacharutzot in the sledges habarzel of the iron et ha-gilead (Witness heap, memorial) specifically the Gilead.
 
2 And he said, “The Lord from Zion will roar, and from Jerusalem has set in place His voice; and there is mourning in the pastures of the shepherds’, and the head of the Carmel withers, dries up.” 3 Thus, says the Lord: “Upon three rebellions of  Damascus, and upon four, I will not turn away, upon the threshing in the sledges of the iron specifically the Gilead.
 
“The Lord from Zion will roar, and from Jerusalem has set in place His voice”
 
The judgement of God is seen by the nations and the tribes of Israel as being spoken forth from the place where God has made His Name to dwell (Deut. 12:5-12; Josh. 21:41-43). God has firmly established His voice in Jerusalem the eternal capital of Israel God’s people. This reads as an instant rebuke to both the neighbouring nations who seek to conquer Jerusalem and to the northern tribes who have turned their backs on the Temple in Jerusalem and have set up apostate worship practices in Samaria, in Dan, and in Bethel.
 
The roaring imagery may reflect the coming earthquake described in the first verse (Iben Ezra).
 
We note that the nations mentioned are neighbours Israel rather than distant enemies. Assyria and Egypt for example are not mentioned. The nations are indicted for breaking universally moral law (Noachide), whereas, in the next chapter following the rebuke of Moab, Judah and Israel are charged against the breaking of God’s covenant of distinction specifically made with Israel. This remains the modus operandi of God’s judgement as it is outworked throughout history to this very day. In terms of human allegory, the blood born son is held to a higher standard because it is his example that reflects upon the Father’s character.
 
“and there is mourning in the pastures of the shepherds’”
 
Amos is a shepherd but the text of the first chapter uses the Hebrew noked (sheep herder) in referring to his vocation whereas the Hebrew roiym (plural of ra’ah) is used when the Lord’s voice first speaks His judgement against the shepherds of the nations, and of Judah and Israel.
 
The mourning within the pastures, that is the habitations of the shepherds has obvious significance. Mourning occurs following absence or death. Thus, the absence and death of the shepherds is the intended meaning of the mourning pastures. Additionally, mourning denotes repentance. To use a mashal (parable) In light of the deaths of false shepherds the sheep repent.
 
“the head of the Carmel withers, dries up”
 
Carmel simply means “fruitful” and therefore is a fruitful mountain in the land of Israel. There were at least two mountains by this name at that time, one in the tribe of Judah, near where Nabal lived (1 Sam. 25:2), and the more well-known one in the tribe of Asher, near Akko north-west of Tekoa on the west coast of Israel. Some think the former is meant, because it is nearer Tekoa, and therefore more familiar to Amos. However, this seems unlikely given that first of all the Hebrew does not read as “carmel” but as “ha-carmel”, which denotes the primacy of the mountain in question and its significance to all Israel, and secondly because the message of Amos is primarily given to the northern tribes and is meant to indict Israel from top to bottom. The rosh “head” or top of the mountain is said to wither and dry up and thus, signifies the demise of the northern kingdom. 
 
“Upon three rebellions of  Damascus, and upon four, I will not turn away,”
 
We note that the root action that proceeds from idolatry and informs all sin behaviours, pesha from pasha, rebellion is emphasised here. What follows is an indictment against the surrounding nations and ultimately against Israel God’s chosen. The threefold repetition “Upon three rebellions” which points to the wilful and perpetual nature of the sins of the nations is sealed with the fourth indictment “and upon four” which makes their coming punishment a forgone conclusion.
 
God, Who sees all things and the end from the beginning, Who exists outside of time and space and in Whom all things exist and have their being, speaks into time and space through His servant Amos the things that have already occurred from God’s perspective.
 
This does not mean that the freewill of the nation’s unto repentance has been revoked, rather, it means that God has already seen the outcome of the chosen actions of the nations.
 
Put concisely God is saying “I will not allow wonton rebellion to go unpunished!” We should remember with fear and trembling that those who enable the sin of the unrepentant become participants in that sin, and those who have it in their power to punish the unrepentant and fail to do so are guilty of compounding the suffering of their victims. The practice of neglecting justice under the guise of practicing social justice, which has become all too popular in the modern church, is abhorrent to God. “For three examples of rebellion… even for a fourth”, He will not withhold discipline, how much more so against the global rebellions of the modern church.
 
The indictment begins with Damascus the then capital of Aram (modern Syria), and her continuing attacks against Ramot Gilead in the tribal land of Manasseh. The Jewish commentator Kimkhi understands “Upon three rebellions of  Damascus, and upon four”, to refer to specific seasons in which the Arameans (Syrians) oppressed the people of Israel: first in the times of Baasha, then in the times of Ahab, a third time in the days of Jehoahaz the son of Jehu, and the fourth in the times of Ahaz. Thus, the head of Aram (Syria), Damascus, will not escape the certain punishment of God.
 
“upon the threshing in the sledges of the iron specifically the Gilead.”
 
This is a description of the threshing of grain which used to be threshed out by iron teeth protruding from a wooden block, the top of which was filled with stones to weight it down. It was drawn over the sheaves in order to beat and separate out the grain on the threshing floor. This is a metaphor for the way Hazael of Aram (Syria) treated the Reubenites and Gadites and the half tribe of Manasseh (2 Kings 7:12; 10:32).
 
4 Veshilachtiy And I will send My eish fire bebeiyt into the house Chazaeil of Hazael (Sees, perceives – God, the Judge) ve’achelah and it will devour armenot the citadels (mountain top fortresses) of Ben (Son of) Hadad (mighty, proper noun of a false deity).
 
4 And I will send My fire into the house of Hazael and it will devour the citadels of Ben Hadad.
 
“I will send My fire into the house of Hazael and it will devour the citadels of Ben Hadad.”
 
As is so often the case in Scripture, the fire of God’s wrath is not pictured here as a warm campfire but as a blazing inferno of wrath. Those within the modern church context who foolishly ask God to consume them with His fire would be wise to repent before the fire comes.
 
Hazael and Ben Hadad are kings of Aram (Syria) [2 Kings 8:7-15; 13:22-25]. Aram being the nation indicted in the previous verse. The fire of God will destroy the house and kingly succession of Hazael’s progeny and will devour the legacy built by Ben Hadad.
 
5 Ve’sharvartiy I will break beriyach the bar (of the gate) of Damesek (Silent sackcloth weaver) Damascus, vehichratiy and I will cut off yosheiv the inhabitant mibikat-aven from the Valley of Aven (vanity), vetomeich and he who holds sheivet a sceptre (staff), from Beiyt (House of) Eden (Pleasantness, delight, luxury); vegalu and they will go into captivity, am-Aram (Exalted, fortress) the people of Aram (Syria) to Kiyrah (Wall, a fortress of Moab),” says YHVH (Mercy) the Lord.
 
5  I will break the bar of Damascus, and I will cut off the inhabitant from the Valley of Aven, and he who holds a sceptre, from Beiyt Eden; and they will go into captivity, the people of Aram to Kiyrah,” says the Lord.
 
“I will break the bar of Damascus”
 
This refers to the bar that both locks and strengthens the main gate of the city as protection against invaders.
 
The gods of the Arameans were gods of the valleys (1 Kings 20:23), thus, Aven may refer to a specific deity.
 
The wordplay in the Hebrew names Aven (vanity, delusion) and Beiyt Eden (house of pleasantness) is clear. Those within Aram who dwell in the vanity and delusion of idolatry will be cut off and the ruler (sceptre) who enjoys the luxury born of the house of pleasantness (pointing to the east and toward kiyrah the place the Arameans came from) will go into captivity. The Assyrians exiled the Arameans to Kiyrah after they had put an end to the kingdom of Aram (2 Kings 16:9).
 
6 Thus, says YHVH (Mercy) the Lord: “Al Upon sheloshah three pisheiy rebellions of Aza (Strong) Gaza, ve'al and upon arba’ah four, lo ashiyvenu I will not turn away, al upon them is haglotam the removal galut into captivity shelemah of those dwelling in peace lehasgiyr to imprisonment le-Edom (Red, of Esau, opposed to Jacob [Israel]) to Edom. 7 And I will send My eish fire bechomat on the wall of Aza (Gaza) ve’achelah and it will devour armenotayah the citadels (high fortresses).
 
6 Thus, says the Lord: “Upon three rebellions of Gaza, and upon four, I will not turn away, upon them is the removal into captivity of those dwelling in peace to imprisonment to Edom. 7 And I will send My fire on the wall of Gaza and it will devour the citadels.
 
Gaza here is mentioned as the head over all the Philistine cities of that time. The three others mentioned by name are Ashdod, Ashkelon and Ekron. Just as judgement was coming against all of Aram, so too it was coming against all of the Philistines. These same Philistine cities are mentioned in the same order in Zephaniah 2:4
 
“upon them is the removal into captivity of those dwelling in peace to imprisonment to Edom.”
 
This refers to the Philistines carrying away all the wealth of the house of Jehoram king of Judah, along with his sons and his wives, leaving behind only one son, the youngest, Jehoahaz, as recorded in 2 Chronicles 21:17.
 
“7 And I will send My fire on the wall of Gaza and it will devour the citadels.”
 
The fire of God’s judgement is sent upon “the walls”, that is to tear down the defences of Gaza. This prophecy has multiple historical fulfilments from Uziyah (2 Chronicles 26:5), to Hezekiah (2 Kings 18:8), and on to the secular tyrant Alexander the Great, who, after he had taken Tyre, besieged Gaza.

8 Vehichratiy and I will cut off yosheiv the inhabitant maashdod from Ashdod (Powerful destroyer), vetomeich and he who holds sheivet a sceptre (staff), maashkelon from Ashkelon (Fire weighed out); vahashivotiy and I will turn yadiy My hand al upon Ekron (Torn up by the roots), veavedu she’eiriyt Pelishtiym and the remnant of the Philistines (Immigrants) will perish,” says Adonay YHVH (Mercy) the Lord, the Unpronounceable Name (Mercy).
 
8 And I will cut off the inhabitant from Ashdod, and he who holds a sceptre, from Ashkelon; and I will turn My hand upon Ekron, and the remnant of the Philistines will perish,” says Adonay the Lord.
 
Ultimately the remnant of the ancient Philistines was wiped out leaving no connection to a modern people group. Some think that this was finally accomplished during the time of the Maccabees (1 Maccabees 10) [167-37 BCE].
 
9 Thus, says YHVH (Mercy) the Lord: “Al Upon sheloshah three pisheiy rebellions of Tzor (Flint rock) Tyre, ve'al and upon arba’ah four, lo ashiyvenu I will not turn away, al upon hasgiyram the imprisonment of galut captivity shelemah of those dwelling in peace le-Edom (Red, of Esau, opposed to Jacob [Israel]) to Edom, velo and he did not zacheru remember beriyt a covenant of achiym brothers.
 
9 Thus, says the Lord: “Upon three rebellions of Tyre, and upon four, I will not turn away, upon the imprisonment of captivity of those dwelling in peace to Edom, and he did not remember a covenant of brothers.
 
Tyre is the ancient coastal Phoenician merchant Island city that was allied to Israel by a treaty “of brotherhood” during the reign of King David (1 Kings 5:1). This relationship continued through the reigns of Solomon (1 Kings 5:12) and Ahab, whose father in law ruled Tyre and Sidon (1 Kings 16:30-31).
 
The specific sin of the Phoenicians was that they took captives of the northern tribes and sold them to Edom. However, the greater sin was that they had broken a covenant of brotherhood with Israel that had been long established. With regard to covenant, this indictment reflects the indictment that God brings against Israel and Judah.

10 And I will send My eish fire bechomat on the wall of Tzor (Flint rock) Tyre, ve’achelah and it will devour armenotayah the citadels (high fortresses).”
 
10 And I will send My fire on the wall of Tyre, and it will devour the citadels.”
 
Tyre was an Island port that was extremely difficult to conquer, and yet God promises to destroy by fire her walls and devour (dismantle) her citadels. Alexander the Great conquered Tyre in 332 BCE by constructing a causeway between the mainland and the Island.
 
11 Thus, says YHVH (Mercy) the Lord: “Al Upon sheloshah three pisheiy rebellions of Edom (Red, of Esau, opposed to Jacob [Israel]), ve'al and upon arba’ah four, lo ashiyvenu I will not turn away, al upon radefo his pursuit of his brother va’cherev achiyv with the sword veshichet and destroying rachamayv his compassion; vayitrof la’ad-apo his anger also tears apart continually, ve’evrato and his wrath shemara is guarded, kept netzach maintained perpetually.
 
11 Thus, says YHVH (Mercy) the Lord: “Upon three rebellions of Edom, and upon four, I will not turn away, upon his pursuit of his brother with the sword and destroying his compassion; his anger also tears apart continually, and his wrath is guarded, kept maintained perpetually.
 
Edom, the nation descended from Esau (Gen. 25:23-30; 27:39-40; 36) was a brother to Israel (Jacob). In spite of Jacob’s reconciliatory actions toward Esau, Esau never truly forgave Jacob*, nor did his descendants. The nation of Edom was a perpetual thorn in the side of Israel. Thus, God commands punishment against Edom for her unrelenting persecution of His chosen people Israel.
 
*For further study read my article on Genesis 33: https://www.bethmelekh.com/yaakovs-commentary/genesis-33-jacob-goes-out-to-meet-esau

12 And I will send My eish fire beteiyman on Teman (Southward) ve’achelah and it will devour armenotayah the citadels (high fortresses) of Botzrah (enclosure, sheepfold).”
 
12 And I will send My fire on Teman (Southward) and it will devour the citadels of Botzrah.”
 
This denotes a purging fire throughout the kingdom of Edom from the then capital Teman to Botzrah.
 
13 Thus, says YHVH (Mercy) the Lord: “Al Upon sheloshah three pisheiy rebellions of benay the children of Amon (Peoples), ve'al and upon arba’ah four, lo ashiyvenu I will not turn away, al upon bikam their ripping open harot the pregnant women of Gilad (Witness heap, memorial) Gilead, lima’an in order to harchiyv enlarge et-gevulam their territories.
 
13 Thus, says the Lord: “Upon three rebellions of the children of Amon, and upon four, I will not turn away, upon their ripping open the pregnant women of Gilead, in order to enlarge their territories.
 
Notice that benay “children” are added to the indictment against Amon. The Hebrew benay is not used in the previous indictments against other nations nor in the indictments that follow.
 
The murder of unborn children was a means for enlarging territory for a period of at least two generations. It was a heinous premeditation, which is why in the “rebellions” three and fourfold the “children” of Amon are added to the indictment. God’s justice meted out against the sin of a single generation of those mentioned previously, will be meted out twofold against the twofold generational sin of Amon. This due to the exalted depravity of the actions of the people of Amon.

14 And I will ve’hitzatiy kindle My eish fire bechomat on the wall of Rabbah (Great) [Rabbah-Ammon], and it will devour armenotayah the citadels (high fortresses) amid bitruah (in teruah) soundings of alarm beyom on the day milchamah of battle, besa’ar in a raging storm beyom on the day of gale force winds. 15 Ve’halach malkam Their king bagolah will go into captivity, hu vesarayv he and his princes yachdav together,” says YHVH (Mercy) the Lord.
 
14 And I will kindle My fire on the wall of Rabbah, and it will devour the citadels amid soundings of alarm on the day of battle, in a raging storm on the day of gale force winds. 15  Their king will go into captivity, he and his princes together,” says YHVH (Mercy) the Lord.
 
Rabbah Ammon (2 Sam. 12:26) was the capital of the kingdom of the Ammonites and therefore symbolises the destruction of their rulers, and subsequently the entire kingdom (Jeremiah 49:2).
 
The use of the Hebrew yatzat “kindle” here in relation to the fire of God’s wrath, rather than the previously used shalach “send”, denotes an act of destruction by fire that the Lord is kindling in their midst as opposed to sending via His hand. This kindling may refer to the raising up of Nebuchadnezzar, who is referred to by Jeremiah as God’s servant (Jeremiah 25:9; 27:6; 43:10).
 
The Hebrew bit’ruah a contraction meaning “in sounding”, refers specifically to the shofar sound denoting alarm (9 staccato blasts), which is used to draw connection between the prophet’s hometown (Tekoa), and his calling and role*.
 
*See notes on verse 1.
 
15  Their king will go into captivity, he and his princes together,” says YHVH (Mercy) the Lord.
 
This refers to Baalis the last king of Ammon, who was an accessary to the murder of Gedaliah, (Jer. 40:14) whom the king of Babylon had set over the remnant of the Jews left in Judea. This provoked the king of Babylon to send Nebuzaradan his general against Baalis, putting Ammon to fire and sword, destroying the capital city Rabbah Ammon, and carrying Baalis and his nobles into captivity (cf. Jer. 49:3).
 
Copyright 2022 Yaakov Brown