Introduction:
 
Before continuing to study the writer’s exposition of Psalms 110, and the comparative teaching concerning the priesthood of Melkiy Tzedek as it reflects the type of priesthood ordered by the Messiah, which is over all peoples regardless of ethnicity, we first need to understand that many of the Jewish Messiah followers of the latter first century still found the idea that Gentiles could be collectively saved or atoned for before the God of Israel, untenable. While they held that the righteous among the nations could be part of the Olam Haba (world to come), they did not necessarily believe that the redemptive purposes of God for the nations were equivalent to His purposes for Israel, and in part they were correct, but only in part. The writer of the Book to the Hebrews knows that many of those who would receive his Holy Spirit inspired words still considered Messiah Yeshua relevant predominantly and or only to Jews (descendants of Jacob).
 
Therefore, he is writing (inspired by the Holy Spirit) in such a way as to shake them loose from their spiritual bigotry. He is most certainly not writing in order to rob them of their unique ethno-religious identity as Jews chosen by God. Nor is he at any point suggesting that because Messiah Yeshua’s priesthood is in the order or type of that of Melkiy Tzedek (the mortal priest and king of Salem), that the priesthood of Aaron is redundant (this is clearly not the case given that the very acts of Messiah’s life and sacrificial practice, along with the function of intercession before God in the heavenly holy of holies as Kohen Gadol, reflect the Levitical priesthood which unlike Melkiy Tzedek’s priesthood, had the Mishkan [Tent of Meeting] and the Temple as shadows of the heavenlies, in which to approach God according to the order of the universe as He has set it in place).
 
Therefore, Messiah’s Priesthood is reflected in both the priesthood of Melkiy Tzedek and the priesthood of Aaron (Levitical), and, without the sacrificial death of Messiah, foreshadowed in the Pesach of Israel and the Yom Kippur sacrifice of the Aaronic priesthood, there would be no possibility of another priest like Melkiy Tzedek arising.
 
Additionally, Messiah’s Priesthood, which is like Melkiy Tzedek’s priesthood, is not Melkiy Tzedek’s priesthood. It is Yeshua’s priesthood. It is of fundamental importance that this is understood. The writer makes this clear but the interpretation of numerous theologians through the centuries has muddied the waters for many.
 
As is the case with all Scripture (scrolls of the original texts), there are no chapter breaks or verse markers (or punctuation for that matter) in the scroll of the Book to the Hebrews. It’s important to see the text of this chapter as a continuation of the previous chapter, the last verses of chapter 6 being:
 
19 This hope we have as an anchor of the soul, a hope both certain, loyal and forceful, reliable and one which enters into the house (Temple), the inner veil parochet[H] [the veil hung before the holy of holies], 20 where Yeshua has entered as a forerunner for us, having become a high priest forever according to the word, order, type, style, arrangement of Melkiy Tzedek.
 
BOOK TO THE HEBREWS Chapter 7 (Author’s translation)
 
1For this Melkiy Tzedek[H], king of Shalem[H], priest of El Elyon[H] God Most High, who met Avraham[H] (Father of many peoples) as he was returning from the slaughter, cutting to pieces of the kings and blessed [spoke blessing over] him, [Gen. 14:18-20] 2 to whom also Avraham[H] apportioned a tenth of all, was first of all, by interpretation, king of righteousness, and then also king of Shalem[H], which is king of peace. 3 Without father, without mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, but was a copy, a model passed off as, a facsimile, a foreshadow of the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually. 4 Now observe how great this man was to whom Avraham[H], the patriarch, founder of the tribe, progenitor, head of the fathers gave a tenth of the spoils, off the top of the heap. 5 And indeed those of the sons of Leviy[H] (joined to) who receive the office of priest have a commandment, precept to collect a tenth from the people according to the Torah[H] (Instruction), that is, from their brothers/people, although they come from the loins Avraham[H]. 6 But he whose genealogy, family is not counted from them, collected a tenth from Avraham[H] and spoke a blessing over him who has been given the promises. 7 And beyond all dispute the lesser is blessed by the greater. 8 In this case mortal men  receive tithes, but there he of whom it is recorded that he lives. 9 And, so I could say, through Avraham[H] even Leviy[H], who received tithes, has paid tithes, 10 for he was still in the loins of his forefather when Melkiy Tzedek[H] met him. 11 If therefore, perfecting, completing, fulfilling was through the Levitical priesthood, [for on the basis of it the people received the Torah[H]], what further need was there for another priest to arise according to the order, arrangement, type, style of Melkiy Tzedek[H], and not be designated according to the order, arrangement, type, style of Aharon[H]? 12 For when the priesthood is translated, it is necessary that there takes place a translation of Torah[H] also. 13 For the one about whom these things are said belongs to another tribe, from which no one has officiated at the altar. 14 For it is evident that our Lord is descended from Yehudah[H], a tribe with reference to which Moshe[H] said nothing concerning priesthood. 15 And this is clearer still, if another priest arises according to the likeness of Melkiy Tzedek[H], 16 who has become a priest not on the basis of a law of physical (ethnic) requirement, but according to the miraculous power of an indestructible, endless, insoluble life. 17 For it is attested of Him, “You are a priest  forever According to the order, arrangement, fashion, style of Melkiy-tzedek[H].” [Ps. 110:4 (109:4 LXX)] 18 For, on the one hand, there is putting away of a former commandment because of its weakness and unprofitableness 19 (for the Torah[H] made nothing perfect); but the introducing of a better hope, through which we draw near to God. 20 And accordingly not without an oath 21 (for they indeed became priests without an oath, but He with an oath through the One who said to Him, “HaShem (YHVH: Mercy) has sworn And will not change His mind, ‘You are a priest forever’”; 22 by the same extent Yeshua[H] also has become the guarantee of a better covenant. 23 The former priests, on the one hand, existed in greater numbers because they were prevented by death from continuing; 24 Yeshua[H], on the other hand, because He continues, abides, dwells, remains forever, has an immutable, unchanging priesthood. 25 Therefore, He is also able to save to the full end, perfectly, forever those who come to God through Him, since He always lives to make intercession for them. 26 For it was fitting for us to have such a high priest, holy, innocent, undefiled, separated from sinners, and made higher  than the heavens; 27 who does not need to offer sacrifices daily, like those high priests, first for His own sins [missing the mark set by God’s holiness] and then for the sins of the people, because He did this once for all when He offered up His soul. 28 For the Torah[H] appoints men as high priests who are infirm, weak, but the word, essence, substance of the oath, which came after the Torah[H], appoints a Son, who has been made consecrated forever.
 
HEBREWS 7 (line upon line)
 
1For this Melkiy Tzedek[H] (My king of Righteousness), king of Shalem[H] (Peace, wholeness, well-being), priest of El Elyon[H] God Most High, who met Avraham[H] (Father of many peoples) as he was returning from the slaughter, cutting to pieces (kopē[G]) of the kings, (basileus[G], hamelakhiym[H]) and blessed [spoke blessing over] (eulogeō[G], yivar’cheihu[H]) him, [Gen. 14:18-20] 2 to whom also Avraham[H] apportioned a tenth (dekatē[G]) of all, was first (prōton[G]) of all, by interpretation (hermēneuō[G]), king of righteousness (basileus dikaiosunē[G]), and then also king of Shalem[H], which is king of peace (basileus eirēnē[G], melekh hashalom[H]).
 
1For this Melkiy Tzedek[H], king of Shalem[H], priest of El Elyon[H] God Most High, who met Avraham[H] (Father of many peoples) as he was returning from the slaughter, cutting to pieces of the kings, and blessed [spoke blessing over] him, [Gen. 14:18-20] 
 
This is a paraphrase of the historical narrative recorded in Genesis 14. The writer of the Book to the Hebrews touches on the elements of the story that best convey his drash (comparative teaching). He is by no means expounding the finer details of the historical narrative. This is a drash on, and not a literal interpretation of Genesis 14.
 
We note that Melkiy Tzedek was both a king and a priest, roles that were distinct and separate in Israelite history, and that he did not know God as YHVH but as El Elyon (God above all Gods, Supreme God). Additionally Melkiy Tzedek approached Avraham, and not the other way around. All of this is a picture or foreshadow, a prefigure of Messiah and His ministry, but does not mean Melkiy Tzedek the mortal king-priest was Yeshua. To the contrary, it means that he was not.
 
Shalem (Jerusalem), from which Melkiy Tzedek had come was most likely named for the Canaanite deity Shalim. Shalim (evening star deity) and Shahar (morning star deity) were Canaanite mountain gods of dusk and dawn. This is one of the reasons it is important that Melkiy Tzedek is clearly identified as worshipping El Elyon (God most high), Whom the Canaanites would have understood as the Supreme God of their pantheon. Once again, with these things in mind, it is blasphemous to say that Melkiy Tzedek and Yeshua are one in the same. The nature of Melkiy Tzedek’s religious environment make the idea abhorrent. Melkiy Tzedek is a mortal type, used as a foreshadow, nothing more.
 
NB: Regarding the Genesis 14 account, it’s worth noting for the purpose of context, that the plunder of the five defeated kings and the plunder of the four previously defeated kings made up a total spoil gleaned from nine kings, Avraham being the tenth king/ruler. We note that Avraham (then Avram) returned the captive people of Sodom and took nothing of the spoils of Sodom except that which was rightfully owed to his men for the work they had performed on behalf of the defeated king of Sodom. Avraham, as the tenth king (king of fullness) then offered a tithe (10) of fullness to the then priestly representative of El Elyon (God most high). A tenth of his personal wealth.
 
2 to whom also Avraham[H] apportioned a tenth of all, was first of all, by interpretation, king of righteousness, and then also king of Shalem[H], which is king of peace.
 
The writer explains the interpretation of the Hebrew name of the ancient kingly priest Melkiy Tzedek as part of the midrashic process and not in order to explain the Hebrew language to the believing Jewish recipients or because he is addressing non-Jews who lack Hebrew understanding. Given that the recipients of the work are believing Jews, we should understand the pretext to these words as being “You know this story, you know Melkiy Tzedek’s name means ‘King of Righteousness’ and that Shalem is an old name for Jerusalem the city where peace is outpoured”.
 
The writer is using the meaning of Melkiy Tzedek’s name to teach a remez (hint) at an allegory/comparison. This was common rabbinical practice from prior to the first century C.E. and beyond, Yeshua Himself employed this type of teaching method, known as PaRDeS (p’shat [plain], remez [hint], drash [comparative], sod [mystery]). Knowing this (alongside numerous other textual and historical indicators) puts death to the foolish idea that the writer of the Book to the Hebrews is saying that Melkiy Tzedek and Yeshua are one in the same. They are not. It saddens me greatly that this has to be emphasised so emphatically due to the proliferation of false interpretation at the present time.
 
An explanation of Yeshua’s use of the teaching method PaRDeS:
 
Is there any implicit support for the rabbinical method PaRDeS within the texts of the Bible?
 
The P’shat or plain meaning is self-explanatory. There is no need to explain to a reader that the book means what it says. Therefore, there is no need to show evidence from the Bible that God intends for us to take it at face value relative to context: linguistic, cultural, historical, geographical, figurative, poetic and metaphorical.
 
The first mention of the practice of examining the Scriptures in an exegetical way is in the book of Ezra the scribe.
 
“For Ezra had set his heart to l’drosh inquire of the Torah of Adonai, to observe and to teach its statues and ordinances in Israel.” –Ezra 7:10
 
The root “darash (drash)” is used specifically in relation to the Torah and therefore describes a practice of interpretation and an intention to walk according to that interpretation and teach it to others. This is the perfect example of what it means to make a drash, or comparative teaching.
 
As Jews who follow Yeshua, we should look to Him and His disciples for evidence of the use of rabbinical interpretive method. If He doesn’t teach using the PaRDeS method, then why would we?
 
Let’s take a look at just a few of the many Brit HaChadashah (New Testament) examples of PaRDeS found in the book of Matthew.
 
As stated earlier, every part of Scripture has a plain meaning, therefore P’shat (the plain interpretation) is the basis for the subsequent methods of interpretation.
 
Remez (Hint)
Matthew 2:15 - "Out of Egypt I called my son." This is a quote from Hosea 11:1 and is being applied to Yeshua by Matthew. If we read it to refer to the p’shat (plain meaning) of Hosea 11:1, we must interpret it to refer to Israel (collectively). However, Matthew, the disciple of Yeshua, divinely inspired by God, interprets it as a remez (hint) which is alluding to the Messiah King as God’s Son. This is just one of many examples of Matthew’s use of remez.
 
D'rash (Inquire)
Matthew 18:18 - "... Whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven." This verse taken literally and out of context is often used by Christians to demand that spiritual powers submit to them. However, within the context of Matthew 18:14-18 the p’shat (plain meaning) refers to the practical application of principals concerning those who are sinning within the body of believers. Thus the plain meaning indicates a d'rash (comparative teaching) concerning the binding and loosing of our own actions according to Halakhah the way we walk (Yet another rabbinical method of teaching practice that Yeshua and His disciples applied to daily life).
 
Sod (Mystery)
Matthew 26:28 - "Then He took the cup, gave thanks and offered it to them saying, ‘Drink from it all of you, This is my blood’ ..." If the figurative language here were taken literally it would not only violate the Torah commandment against consuming blood, but along with other verses concerning the eating of Yeshua's flesh (John 6:51-56), could be understood as teaching cannibalism. Yeshua explains to His disciples that it is the Spirit that produces the deeper understanding (John 6:63), and that His words are spirit and life. This is evidence of a sod (mystery) that cannot be gleaned from the p’shat (plain meaning) of the text. A concept that is illuminated through spiritual revelation alone and by no other means. This particular sod (Mystery) would be fully revealed following His death and resurrection.
 
So what can we conclude?
 
a.     There is no explicit schematic for Bible interpretation within Scripture.
b.     PaRDeS is implicit in Scripture. Both Messiah and His disciples employ it.
c.     It is arrogant and even misleading to use Greco-Roman techniques and post enlightenment textual criticism as tools for Scriptural interpretation while excluding the rabbinical interpretive tradition based on the hypocritical assumption that it is not divinely appointed.
 
Therefore, with regard to Hebrews 7, the point of the writer’s drash is not to show how mystical and awesome Melkiy Tzedek is but how Superior and all existing Yeshua is. Focussing on Melkiy Tzedek (the mortal) misses the point entirely and worse, becomes soil for a seed of idolatry.
 
3 Without father (apator[G], belo-av[H]), without mother (ametor[G], belo-eim[H]), without genealogy, having neither beginning (archē[G]) of days nor end (telos[G]) of life (zoe[G], hachayiym[H]), but was a copy, a model passed off as, a facsimile, a foreshadow (aphomoioō[G]) of the Son of God (uihos Theos[G], Le-ven ha-Elohiym[H]), he remains (menō[G]) a priest perpetually (diēnekes[G], kohen leolam[H]). 4 Now observe how great this man was to whom Avraham[H] (Father of many peoples), the patriarch, founder of the tribe, progenitor, head of the fathers (patriarchēs[G], rosh ha’avot[H]) gave (didōmi[G], natan[H]) a tenth (dekatē[G]) of the spoils, off the top of the heap (akrothinion[G]).
 
3 Without father, without mother, without genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, but was a copy, a model passed off as, a facsimile, a foreshadow of the Son of God, he remains a priest perpetually.
 
“Without father…” His father is not recorded in the genealogies because the genealogies concern the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the focus of the Torah being to point to God’s redemptive work through the choosing of a certain people set apart unto Himself (the descendants of Jacob/Israel, the Jews). Melkiy Tzedek had a human father, his father is simply not recorded. Jews of the first century understood this to be a fact. At no time were they confused over the identity of Melkiy Tzedek. Nor did they believe that Melkiy Tzedek was in any way an eternal being. This is affirmed by the qualifying phrase “without genealogy” which is understood by those who received this work as “his genealogy is not recorded” and not to mean “he had no genealogy”. We know this because verse 6 of this same chapter says “But he whose genealogy, family is not counted from them...” Meaning, he had a genealogy but it’s neither counted according to Leviy nor recorded in the Torah.
 
The Syriac version of the New Testament Book to the Hebrews reads "whose father and mother are not written in the genealogies".
 
“he remains a priest perpetually” In the mind of the reader of the Torah, the man Melkiy Tzedek remains a priest because his genealogy is not recorded, nor is his appointment or any record of succession to his priesthood. This does not mean he wasn’t appointed or that there was not another priest of El Elyon who succeeded Melkiy Tzedek as priest in the then predominantly pagan city of Shalem, rather it simply means that the Torah was not concerned with keeping genealogical records of Gentiles.
 
NB: Jewish tradition teaches that Melkiy Tzedek and Shem the son of Noach (Noah) are one in the same [Nedarim 32b]. However, this is not tenable given the generational gap between Abraham and Shem, and that Abraham himself is a descendant of Shem and of Ur of Chaldee, which bears no geographical correlation to Salem (Jerusalem).
 
“Rabbi Zekharya said in the name of Rabbi Yishmael: The Holy One, Blessed be He, wanted the priesthood to emerge from Shem, so that his children would be priests, as it is stated: “And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine; and he was priest of God the Most High” (Gen. 14:18). Once Melchizedek, traditionally identified as Shem, placed the blessing of Abraham before the blessing of the Omnipresent, He had the priesthood emerge from Abraham in particular, and not from any other descendant of Shem.” -Nedarim 32b
 
In later rabbinic literature Melkiy Tzedek bestows the priesthood on Avraham, who then becomes priest forever (Talmud Bavliy Ned. 32b; Lev. Rab. 25:6). This seems most likely to be a polemic written against the teaching of the Book to the Hebrews.
 
The point being that both pre and post Messianic rabbinic thought understood Melkiy Tzedek to be a mortal king and not a transcendent being.
 
The apocryphal book (mythos) 2 Chanoch (Enoch) 71-72 (71.29, 32), which claims that Melkiy Tzedek was miraculously born of his dead mother Nir, the wife of Noah’s brother and was kept safe through the flood (contrary to what the Torah teaches), in order to be a priest in the post flood generation, may well be one of many reasons for the increasing misteaching among pseudo learned Christians, that he is Yeshua preincarnate. It is sickening to think that non-inspired books full of occult ideology and syncretised Hellenistic mythos such as the books of Enoch, are being used as source material for the spread of pseudo Christian lies throughout the modern Christian community. Rav Shaul warns against Jewish mythos and vain genealogical arguments. We do well to heed his warning:
 
“3 As I urged you, when I was leaving for Macedonia, stay in Ephesus to direct certain people not to pass on different instruction, 4 or to pay attention to myths and endless genealogies. These give rise to useless speculations rather than God’s training which is in faithfulness. 5 Now the goal of this command is love from of a pure heart and a clear conscience and a genuine faith. 6 Some, having missed the mark, have turned away to fruitless discussion— 7 wanting to be teachers of Torah, even though they do not understand what they keep saying or what they so dogmatically assert. 8 But we know that the Torah is good if one uses it legitimately, 9 knowing that the Torah is not given for a tzaddik but for the lawless and rebellious, for the ungodly and sinful, for the unholy and worldly, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers, 10 the sexually immoral, homosexuals, slave-traders, liars, perjurers, and for anything else that opposes sound teaching— 11 in keeping with what was entrusted to me, the glorious Good News of the blessed God.” -1 Timothy 1:3-11 TLV
 
4 Now observe how great this man was to whom Avraham[H], the patriarch, founder of the tribe, progenitor, head of the fathers gave a tenth of the spoils, off the top of the heap.
 
The writer is using Melkiy Tzedek’s greatness as an example of the Superiority of Yeshua’s priesthood over that of Aaron (Levitical). The Superiority of Yeshua being one of the primary themes of the Book to the Hebrews.
 
Hebrews 7:4-11 allude to five ways that Melkiy Tzedek is great:
 
1.     He received a tithe of the plunder of battle from Avraham, even though Avraham was the Progenitor, father of all the Jews and what’s more, is the father of faith to all who believe. Nor did Melkiy Tzedek have a family connection to Avraham (despite the false assertions of certain Jewish traditions), and therefore, did not have the right that the Levitical priests had to receive tithes from their own brothers. In fact Melkiy Tzedek is not recorded by the Torah as being entitled to receive tithes from anyone, whereas the Levitical priests are commanded recieve a tenth of the income of the people of Israel (Heb. 7:4-6).
 
2.     Melkiy Tzedek blessed Avraham, implying that Melkiy Tzedek was greater than Avraham (Heb. 7:6-7).
 
3.     The Levitical priests receive tithes even though they die, whereas Melkiy Tzedek is recorded without genealogy and from a Midrashic view considered to be living, because the Tanakh doesn’t record his death (Heb. 7:8).
 
4.     In order of greatness Melkiy Tzedek is placed above Avraham from whom he received a tenth and Avraham above Leviy, his progeny, who received a tenth from the people of Israel through the Levitical priesthood. This order seen as being subject to the fact that Avraham presented his tenth to Melkiy Tzedek while Leviy was still in his seed as a great grandson (Heb. 7:9-10).
 
5.     The Jewish people were given the Torah in which contained a sacrificial system that required mediation via the priesthood of Leviy. But this system was temporary and could not facilitate eternal atonement. This indicates the need for another, different kind of priest, who is compared with Melkiy Tzedek, a priest, who according to the writer’s drash (comparative teaching) is superior to the greatest of the Levitical high priests, Aharon.
 
The Tenth, Tithe, and Godly Giving (A Supplementary Teaching)
 
Many within the community of faith see the giving of a tenth of their income as an obligation. Or worse, are encouraged to give money they don’t have to fund building projects and programmes that have little eternal value. This is an unfortunate consequence of a theological view point that seeks to utilize the financial elements of Israel’s priesthood to generate income for extra-biblical projects, while ignoring the far greater obligations of Israel’s commonwealth and her Temple centric worship system.
 
It seems ludicrous that a community which so fervently professes the faith of Avraham through Messiah Yeshua (Jesus) [that is the Body of Believers, Church, Ecclesia of Messiah], should completely neglect the actions of Avraham in the matter of tithing/giving.
 
The first person to present a tenth to HaShem is Avram that is Avraham before he became Avraham. This tenth is of great figurative significance to us as Jews. It is not merely an obligation, it is a symbol of all that is complete in us. To separate our financial wealth from our spirituality is as alien a concept to the observant Jew as the idea of separating soul and spirit. We cannot separate the inseparable. We are not spirits in a material world, we are souls (Nefesh), physical, mental, spiritual, emotional: we are complex and unified beings. We are Souls living in God. It is Hashem in Whom we dwell, He Who has made us echad (one).
 
Therefore, if we are obligated to give a tenth we are also obligated to practise all of the instructions of the priesthood. However, if we are free to give, we have a High Priest Yeshua, Who, devoid of sin, is able to complete and perfect in us the fullness of all that His priesthood requires. Even ten (fullness) by ten (fullness) by ten (fullness) l’olam va’ed (for worlds eternal).
 
Gen. 14:18 And Melkiy Tzedek (My King of righteousness) king of Shalem (Peace, wholeness, well-being) brought forth bread (lechem) and wine (yayin); and he was priest of El-Elyon (God the most high). Gen. 14:19 And He blessed him (Avram), and said: “Blessed be Avram (Father of a people) of El-Elyon (God the most high), Maker of heaven and earth; Gen. 14:20 and blessed be El-Elyon (God the most high), Who has delivered your enemies into your hand.” And he (Avram) gave him (Melkiy Tzedek) a tenth of all (Hebrews 7:4). –Berieshit (Genesis) 14:18-20
 
Figuratively speaking, the King of righteousness, Who is also the King of peace and the Great High Priest on behalf of all peoples brought bread and wine to the father of trust, which is faith. As High Priest of the Highest God, He spoke the blessing of God over the father of trust saying, “All blessing has come to you from God, father of a nation: the God above all gods has delivered your enemies and their wealth into your hands.” After the King had spoken these words the father of a nation responded to the King of righteousness, the King of Peace and Wholeness, the Great High Priest, by giving to him a tenth of all that he possessed, both that which had always been his and that which he had plundered from the nations. This tenth symbolized everything that the father of a nation was, and everything that belonged to him. Ten is a symbol of wholeness and completion, of a promise fulfilled and sustained.
 
Therefore, Avram, father of a great people, prior to becoming Avraham, the father of many peoples, offered a symbol of all that he was and was to become, all that he possessed and was to possess. He offered this from the riches of his own household and from the households of the nations he had plundered. Therefore, it is a practice that can be entered into by both Israel and the nations. He offered the tenth freely to a Priest Who held position before the priesthood of Aaron, and Who was a type, a facsimile, a foreshadow for the Messiah, Who is the Kohen Ha-Gadol Rabah (Great High Priest). Therefore, this free-will tithe holds authority over the obligatory tithe of the temple service and the priesthood of Aaron.
 
All the tithes and offerings of Israel are presented to God through the mediation of the priesthood of Aaron. Thus, the Kohen Gadol (High Priest) becomes the symbolic head of that priesthood. These tithes and offerings are intended to feed and clothe the priests of God and provide for the service of worship which is to be perpetuated generationally.
 
Messiah did not cancel out the less effective priesthood of Aaron, rather He perfected it, translated it (as the Greek text of Hebrews renders) because He was before it. The Great High Priest Yeshua is now the mediator of the tithes and offerings of HaShem, only rather than making them an obligation He has turned them into an opportunity to respond to the freedom He has purchased on our behalf. This is why Melkiy Tzedek brings bread and wine to Avram. They’re symbols of both provision and redemption. Redemption through the sacrificial blood of Messiah’s death and provision through the life giving blood of His resurrection. Therefore, our tithing and giving are to be offered as a response to this freedom, in the same way that Avram offered his tenth in order to acknowledge the freedom and provision of God. The giving of our tenth, like Avram’s tenth, is a symbolic gesture which acknowledges that everything we are and all that we have belongs to God through Messiah Yeshua.
 
Mark 12:41 He (Yeshua) sat down opposite the treasury and began watching how the people were putting money into the offering box. Many rich people were putting in a lot. Mark 12:42 Then a poor widow came and put in two small copper coins, worth less than a 50 cents. Mark 12:43 Calling His disciples over, He said to them, “Amen, it is certain, I tell you, this poor widow has put in more than all those contributing to the box! Mark 12:44  For they all put in from their surplus; but she, out of her poverty, put in everything she had, her whole living.” –Mark 12:41-44
 
In this historical account, Yeshua observes a poor widow and illuminates her actions as being the actions of someone who has decided to offer all to God in the practice of worshipping Him.
 
Avram’s tenth was also a foreshadowing of the widow’s offering. He did not give it to cover a debt or as an obligatory tithe but as a symbolic gesture which said, “All that I have and am belong to you HaShem”.
 
This teaches us that the value of that which we give is measured by the intention of the heart of the giver. A believer may never tithe to an organized community of faith, instead, he may open his home to strangers, spending more than a tenth on providing for them and caring for their wellbeing. He may be in the practice of giving to fellow believers when they’re in need or lending his possessions to be used by others in the community. By doing this he shows that all that he has belongs to HaShem. Thus, he gives to God in all circumstances, surpassing the requirement of the Torah.
 
The number ten is a symbol of all that we are and all that we have.
 
“The point is this: whoever sows sparingly shall also reap sparingly, and whoever sows bountifully shall also reap bountifully.” -2 Corinthians 9:6  
 
When we look at tithing and giving as loosing, or sacrificing something we are missing the point. A wise farmer keeps aside a portion of the grain in order to seed the soil for the next season’s crop. He doesn’t consider this to be a loss or a sacrifice, rather he considers it a necessary part of the process of sowing and reaping. If he fails to plant enough seed he will also fail to reap a good crop. However, when he practices effective sowing he also reaps the benefit. The giving Rav Shaul is describing in 2 Corinthians is one or reciprocity. God owns all, therefore, He supplies us with all things and allows us to manage that supply. Additionally, rather than keeping the harvest for Himself and hoarding its benefits like a human land owner would do, God gives the fruit of the harvest back to the grower and leaves the grower to decide what he will offer as a token of his gratefulness to God.
 
Today, there are those who misuse the principal of sowing and reaping to illicit funds from people who have nothing more to give. They encourage believers to mortgage houses and take out loans in order to, “reap” a greater reward. In doing so they bring poverty to the community of believers while they build worthless icons in memory of their so called ministries. This is a grievous sin against the body of Messiah that should not be tolerated. God does not ask us to give from what we don’t have but from what we have.
 
The Scripture says, “My God shall supply all my needs according to His riches and glory” not, “I shall supply God’s needs according to my loans and lack of finances.” Those wolves among us, who steal from the poor in order to prosper themselves, may well have turned to the widow whom Yeshua spoke of and said, “If you’ve got a house you should mortgage it, two little coins will not reap the harvest God desires for your life, if you keep sowing so sparingly you’ll become even more accursed by God.” These liars, despicable leeches, false teachers, are condemned men.
 
“2 Co. 9:7 Let each one give as he has decided in his heart, not grudgingly or under compulsion—for God loves a cheerful giver. 2 Co. 9:8 And God is able to make all grace overflow to you, so that by always having enough of everything, you may overflow in every good work. 2 Co. 9:9  As it is written, “He scattered widely, He gave to the poor; His righteousness endures forever.” 2Co 9:10  Now the One who supplies seed to the sower and bread for food will supply and multiply your seed and increase the harvest of your righteousness.” -2 Corinthians 9:7-10
 
Rav Shaul (Paul) explains that it is the heart (leiv) intention (the intention of the core being, not the intention of the emotion) that determines the value of the gift. Remember, it already belongs to God. He is a debtor to no one. If we give grudgingly it is as if we hadn’t given at all. Of course, due to the nature of sowing and reaping, we will also fail to benefit from an abundant crop. This is not a punitive action on God’s part, rather it is the natural result of our own actions.
 
“2 Co. 9:11  You will be enriched in everything for all generosity, which through us brings about thanksgiving to God. 2 Co. 9:12  For this service of giving is not only supplying the needs of the kedoshiym (holy, set apart ones), but is also overflowing with many thanksgivings to God.” -2 Corinthians 9:11-12
 
When we give from an understanding of God’s goodness toward us we see God’s provision in all things and are grateful. This in turn inspires us to give to others from the overflow of our own spiritual and physical wealth. Rav Shaul calls this act a “service”, meaning an act of temple worship, a service of the priesthood of all believers. Thus, in Messiah, the Great High Priest, we act as priests under His authority. The result is not only blessing and thanks giving among the holy ones (believers), but also an overflow to those around us. This overflow draws people to Messiah, Who reconciles them to God. Thus giving is one of the ways that the Gospel is perpetuated.
 
“Because of the evidence of this service, they praise God for the obedience of your affirmation of the Good News of Messiah and for the generosity of your contribution to them and to everyone.” -2 Corinthians 9:13 
 
As a result of our giving other believers praise God and give Him the glory due His Name. Our giving affirms our certain hope in the Gospel of the Messiah.
 
“2 Co. 9:14  And in their prayer for you, they long for you because of the surpassing grace of God upon you. 2 Co. 9:15  Thanks be to God for His indescribable gift!” -2 Corinthians 9:14-15 TLV
 
Our giving is the fruit of the surpassing chesed (practical love) of God which is upon us. It is an act of worship that gives voice to the eternal truth that God’s greatest gift, the gift of His Son, has produced a great harvest of souls. Thus, we praise Him and give thanks to Him.
 
Conclusion:
 
1.     The number ten (Tithe) reminds us that all that we are and all that we have, belong to God in Messiah Yeshua.
2.     The free-will tithe of Avram holds authority over the obligatory tithe of the temple service and the priesthood of Aaron.
3.     God asks us to give of what we have, not from what we don’t have. Anyone who suggests that the widow in the story of the widow’s offering should mortgage her home because she didn’t give enough in order to reap abundantly, is misunderstanding the principal of sowing and reaping and worse, is committing a grievous sin against the body of Yeshua
4.     We are not obligated to give, nor are we free not to give. Like trust and action (faith and works) freedom and giving go hand in hand, they are intrinsically linked, a complex unity
5.     The purpose of our giving is to facilitate the perpetuation of the worship of God in our generation and to seed the Gospel work of God's people, so that others will be redeemed into His kingdom and enjoy the prosperity of God, which is both within and beyond the material world
6.     Godly giving transforms the seed of temporary wealth into the fruit of eternal peace.
 
5 And indeed (amein[H]) those of the sons (uihos[G], b’naiy[H]) of Leviy[H] (joined to) who receive (lambanō[G]) the office of priest (hierateia[G], hakehunah[H]) have a commandment, precept (entolē[G]) to collect a tenth (apodekatoō[G], ma’aseir[H]) from the people according to the Torah[H] (Instruction), that is, from their brothers/people (adelphos[G], ha’am[H]), although they come from the loins (osphus[G]) of Avraham[H]. 6 But he whose genealogy, family (genealogeō[G], lemishpechotam[H]) is not counted from them, collected a tenth (apodekatoō[G], ma’aseir[H]) from Avraham[H] and spoke a blessing (eulogeō[G], beirakh[H]) over him who has been given (echō[G], netunah[H]) the promises (ho epaggelia[G], hahavtachah[H]).
 
5 And indeed those of the sons of Leviy[H] (joined to) who receive the office of priest have a commandment, precept to collect a tenth from the people according to the Torah[H] (Instruction), that is, from their brothers/people, although they come from the loins of Avraham[H]. 
 
“The office of priest” refers specifically to the office of High Priest. Although all Levites are considered priests, different subgroups played different roles. There was one priesthood but many facets.
 
“But the priests the Levites, the sons of Zadok, that kept the charge of my sanctuary when the children of Israel went astray from me, they shall come near to me to minister unto me, and they shall stand before me to offer unto me the fat and the blood, saith the Lord GOD:” -Ezekiel 44:15 KJV
 
“have a commandment, precept to collect a tenth from the people according to the Torah…”
 
“20 The Lord said to Aaron, “You will have no inheritance in their land, nor will you have any share among them; I am your share and your inheritance among the Israelites. 21 “I give to the Levites all the tithes in Israel as their inheritance in return for the work they do while serving at the tent of meeting… 26 “Speak to the Levites and say to them: ‘When you receive from the Israelites the tithe I give you as your inheritance, you must present a tenth of that tithe as the Lord’s offering.” -Numbers 18:20-21, 26 NIV
 
6 But he whose genealogy, family is not counted from them, collected a tenth from Avraham[H] and spoke a blessing over him who has been given the promises.
 
“He whose genealogy is not counted from them collected the tenth” Shows clearly that the one being spoken of has a genealogy, albeit unrecorded in the Torah.
 
Avraham is the one who has been given the promises, and Melkiy Tzedek spoke a blessing over Avraham. All blessing having its origin in God.
 
7 And beyond all dispute (antilogia[G], vedavar yadua[H]) the lesser (katan[H]) is blessed (eulogeō[G], yevorakh[H]) by the greater (hagadol[H]). 8 In this case mortal men (anthrōpos[G], anashiym b’naiy temutah[H]) receive tithes (dekatē[G], ma’aseir[H]), but there (ekei[G]) he of whom it is recorded (martureō[G]) that he lives (zaō[G]). 9 And, so I could say (hos epos epos[G]), through Avraham[H] even Leviy[H], who received tithes (dekatē[G], ma’aseir[H]), has paid tithes (dekatē[G], ma’aseir[H]), 10 for he was still in the loins (osphus[G]) of his forefather (patēr[G], aviyo[H]) when Melkiy Tzedek[H] met him.
 
7 And beyond all dispute the lesser is blessed by the greater. 
 
It’s not true as some Jewish commentators suggest, that the greater does not always bless the lesser. Their reasoning is that Melkiy Tzedek blessed God, but at the same time, those who make this claim understand that all blessing comes from God and that as Jews when we say “Barukh Atah Adonay” We understand “All blessing is of You Adonay”. Therefore, Melkiy Tzedek “blessed God” (acknowledged that all blessing) comes from God. This is an example of God (the Greater) bestowing the ability to bless on Melkiy Tzedek (the lesser), and Melkiy Tzedek offering that blessing back to God so that it might be imparted to Avraham.
 
This is “beyond all dispute” because all blessing comes from God, Who is the Creator of all and in Whom all things exist and have their being. Therefore, the idea that any created thing could bless anyone without that blessing being first supplied by God is ludicrous.
 
8 In this case mortal men receive tithes, but there he of whom it is recorded that he lives.
 
The priests of Leviy all die, but through the remez hinted at in the historical record of Melkiy Tzedek we see that the Greatest High Priest Yeshua continues forever (Psalms 110:4; Heb. 7:24).
 
9 And, so I could say, through Avraham[H] even Leviy[H], who received tithes, has paid tithes, 10 for he was still in the loins of his forefather when Melkiy Tzedek[H] met him.
 
“So I could say” follows the style of Midrashic rabbinical rhetoric. It indicates an allegorical or comparative use of the plain meaning of the text but does not seek to make a claim that the comparison is the literal meaning. Therefore, the fact that Melkiy Tzedek’s genealogy is not recorded is used as a figure foreshadowing a living priesthood that doesn’t die, is not mortal. The writer is not saying that Melkiy Tzedek is immortal. This teaching is based on a historical figure but is literary, not literal.
 
11 If therefore, perfecting, completing, fulfilling (teleiōsis[G]) was through the Levitical (Leuitikos[G], bikunat b’naiy leviy[H]) priesthood (hierōsunē[G]), [for on (epi[G]) the basis of it the people received the Torah[H] (nomotheteō[G])], what further (eti[G]) need was there for another priest (hiereus[G], kohen[H]) to arise according to the order, arrangement, type (taxis[G]) of Melkiy Tzedek[H], and not be designated according to the order, arrangement, type (taxis[G]) of Aharon[H]? 12 For when the priesthood (hierōsunē[G], hakehunah[H]) is translated (metatithēmi[G]), it is necessary that there takes place a translation (metatithēmi[G]) of Torah[H] also.
 
11 If therefore, perfecting, completing, fulfilling was through the Levitical priesthood, [for on the basis of it the people received the Torah[H]], what further need was there for another priest to arise according to the order, arrangement, type of Melkiy Tzedek[H], and not be designated according to the order, arrangement, type of Aharon[H]?
 
“If therefore, perfecting, completing, fulfilling was through the Levitical priesthood, [for on the basis of it the people received the Torah[H]]…” The priesthood which the Torah instructs as mediator of temporal sacrificial symbols offered in the blood of animals, could not perfect sin affected people because the indictment of Torah served to point out humanity’s inability to keep its instruction. Therefore, neither the Torah nor the Levitical priesthood it commanded could bring humanity into a perfect relationship with our Creator, Whom we have sinned against. Our sin separating us from Him.
 
“But your iniquities have separated you from your God; And your sins have hidden His face from you, So that He will not hear.” -Isaiah 59:2 NKJV
 
“what further need was there for another priest to arise according to the order, arrangement, type of Melkiy Tzedek?” This indicates that Yeshua is not Melkiy Tzedek, rather He is “another priest to arise according to the type of Melkiy Tzedek”.
 
Where the Torah was made weak in application by our sinfulness, Messiah Yeshua overcame in sinless perfection, arising as the perfector and finisher of faith. The Superior High Priest.
 
12 For when the priesthood is translated, it is necessary that there takes place a translation of Torah[H] also.
 
“When the priesthood is translated, it is necessary that there takes place a translation of the Torah also.” The immutable aspects of Torah never change, while the aspects of Torah governing indictment against sin will pass away in the Olam Haba (world to come) where there will be no sin and therefore, no need for indictment. Thus, the priesthood of Messiah Yeshua which is like the priesthood of Melkiy Tzedek, translates the Torah into the language of eternity, making an end to temporal things and imparting everlasting things.
 
As I explained in my commentary on chapter 5 the Aaronic priesthood was conferred onto Yeshua by Yochanan the Immerser. Another way of saying this is that through the immersion of Yeshua the priesthood of Aaron is translated into the priesthood of Yeshua, which is like that of Melkiy Tzedek.
 
We note that there is a convergent nature to the priesthood of Yeshua. He unifies the two priesthoods of Melkiy Tzedek and Aaron, which are both in fact everlasting in Him. Given that Pinchas the grandson of Aaron was promised an everlasting priesthood:
 
“And he (Pinchas) shall have it (the priesthood), and his seed after him, the covenant of an everlasting priesthood; because he was zealous for his God, and made an atonement for the children of Israel.” -Numbers 25:13 KJV
 
This is why we must understand “change” metatithēmi[G] in the sense of translation from one form to another rather than an end to the one by the other.
 
13 For the one about whom these things are said belongs (metechō[G]) to another tribe (phulē[G]), from which no one has officiated at the altar (thusiastērion[G], hamizbeakh[H]). 14 For it is evident that our Lord (kurios[G], Adoneiynu[H]) is descended from Yehudah[H] (praise), a tribe with reference to which Moshe[H] (drawn our one) said nothing concerning priesthood (hierōsunē[G], hakehunah[H]).
 
13 For the one about whom these things are said belongs to another tribe, from which no one has officiated at the altar. 14 For it is evident that our Lord is descended from Yehudah[H], a tribe with reference to which Moshe[H] said nothing concerning priesthood.
 
“The one about whom these things are said” refers to Yeshua, Who is the One that the writer’s drash (comparative teaching) is pointing to. The nearest subject in relation to perpetual priesthood is “another priest to arise” (v.11), a reference to Yeshua.
 
“Belongs to another tribe” Is not a Levite. Yeshua is descended of Judah, of David (Gen. 49:10). There is nothing explicitly commanded by Moses concerning anyone from Judah serving as a priest. However, as explained in my commentary on Hebrews 5, Yochanan the Immerser does confer the priesthood of Aaron upon Yeshua at His immersion (baptism).
 
15 And this is clearer still (katadēlos[G]), if another priest (hiereus[G] kohen[H]) arises according to the likeness (homoiotēs[G]) of Melkiy Tzedek[H], 16 who has become a priest not on the basis of a law (nomos[G]) of physical (ethnic) requirement (sarkikos[G]), but according to the miraculous power (dunamis[G]) of an indestructible, endless, insoluble life (akatalutos zoe[G], lechayeiy eiyn sof[H]). 17 For it is attested of Him, “You are a priest (hiereus[G], Kohen[H])  forever (eis aion [G], leolam[H]) According (kata[G]) to the order, arrangement, fashion, style (taxis[G]) of Melkiy-tzedek[H] (My king of righteousness).” [Ps. 110:4 (109:4 LXX)]
 
15 And this is clearer still, if another priest arises according to the likeness of Melkiy Tzedek[H], 16 who has become a priest not on the basis of a law of physical (ethnic) requirement, but according to the miraculous power of an indestructible, endless, insoluble life. 17 For it is attested of Him, “You are a priest  forever According to the order, arrangement, fashion, style of Melkiy-tzedek[H].” [Ps. 110:4 (109:4 LXX)]
 
The subject is Yeshua, Who is “another priest” (like but not Melkiy Tzedek). Yeshua has become priest not on the basis of the Torah requirement of Levitical lineage but based on the fact that He is all existing, of God, affirmed by oath (and His miraculous indestructible life as the Father with us). Thus, “a Priest forever”.
 
18 For, on the one hand, there is putting away (athetēsis[G]) of a former commandment (entolē[G]) because of its weakness (asthenēs[G]) and unprofitableness (anōpheles[G]) 19 (for the Torah[H] [namusa[A]: instruction] made nothing perfect [teleioō[G]]); but the introducing of a better (kreittōn[G]) hope, Good news (elpis[G], tikvah[H], sebar[A]), through which we draw near (eggizō[G]) to God. (Theos[G], HaElohiym[H]) 20 And accordingly not without an oath
 
18 For, on the one hand, there is putting away of a former commandment because of its weakness and unprofitableness 19 (for the Torah[H] made nothing perfect); but the introducing of a better hope, through which we draw near to God. 20 And accordingly not without an oath
 
“there is putting away of a former commandment because of its weakness…” The commandment concerning the mortal priesthood and its symbolic sacrificial system is made weak by the evil inclination of humanity. In short, our inability to perfect it makes it weak. The commandment itself serves its purpose by exposing our sinful weakness.
 
“for the Torah[H] made nothing perfect” Because the purpose of Torah is to point to the perfector Yeshua the King Messiah. The Torah indicts against sin, Messiah delivers from sin. The Torah continues to serve its purpose until the end of the age, and Messiah continues to purpose salvation unto everlasting life. The Torah is not eternal, how could it be? There will be no need for an indictment against sin in the sinless Olam Haba (world to come). Only the knowledge of good will remain, we will therefore, have no need of instruction against evil. If there is an eternal Torah, it is devoid of the confines of mitzvot (commands). Freedom has no need of fences. One who knows only to do good need not be told to do it, everything he does is good.
 
“For what the Torah was powerless to do because it was weakened by the flesh, God did by sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh to be a sin offering. And so he condemned sin in the flesh,” -Romans 8:3
 
It’s important to affirm the goodness and holiness of Torah. The Brit HaChadashah (New Testament) writers honour the place of Torah as that which is (not was) holy and good and points to the King Messiah, its goal.
 
“So then, the Torah is holy, and the commandment is holy and righteous and good.” -Romans 7:12 TLV
 
“For Messiah is the goal of the Torah, the means of righteousness for all who believe.” -Romans 10:4 (YBYP)
 
Ultimately, it is a mistake to focus on Torah observance. Torah is a sign pointing to Messiah, Who authored it, and is the goal of it [Rom. 10:4]. If Messiah lives in you, then His work is manifest in your actions by the power of God's Spirit. One who lives by the Spirit need not debate the keeping of Torah, because “the Torah of the Spirit of life has set you free in Messiah Yeshua from the Torah of sin and death.” [Rav Shaul's letter to the Roman Believers 8:2]
 
21 for they indeed became priests (hiereus[G], lekoheniym[H]) without an oath (horkōmosia[G]), but He with an oath through the One who said to Him, “HaShem (YHVH: Mercy) has sworn And will not change His mind, ‘You are a priest (Kohen[H]) forever (leolam[H])’”; 22 by the same extent Yeshua[H] also has become the guarantee (egguos[G]) of a better covenant (diathēkē[G], labrit hatovah[H]), . 23 The former priests (hiereus[G], koheniym[H]), on the one hand, existed in greater numbers because they were prevented by death (thanatos[G], hamavet[H]) from continuing; 24 Yeshua[H], on the other hand, because He continues, abides, dwells, remains (menō[G]) forever, has an immutable, unchanging (aparabatos[G]) priesthood (hierōsunē[G], kehunato[H]).
 
21 (for they indeed became priests without an oath, but He with an oath through the One who said to Him, “HaShem (YHVH: Mercy) has sworn And will not change His mind, ‘You are a priest forever’”);
 
The priesthood of Aaron was instructed whereas the priesthood of Yeshua is bound by an everlasting oath which God made by His Own Soul.
 
“Will not change His mind” translates as “will not turn His mind” in another direction.
 
This must be understood in accordance with the best commentary that can be made on Biblical text, that being Biblical text:
 
“15 Brothers and sisters, I speak after the manner of human beings; Though it be but a man's covenant, yet if it be confirmed, no man voids it, or adds to it. 16 Now to Abraham and his seed the promises were made. He does not say, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Messiah. 17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Messiah, was four hundred and thirty years after the Torah, which cannot void it, that it should make the promise of none effect. 18 For if the inheritance be of the Torah, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.” -Galatians 3:15-18
 
“13 For when God made a promise to Avraham, since He could swear an oath by no one greater, He swore by Himself, on His own soul, 14 saying, “indeed, for blessing I will bless you and multiplying I will multiply you [your seed/progeny].” [ Gen. 22:17] 15 And so, having patiently waited in his spirit, he obtained the promise. 16 For indeed people swear an oath by one greater, and taking an oath serves as confirmation to them, an end of all strife, dispute, contradiction between them. 17 In the same way God, desiring more abundantly to demonstrate to the heirs of the promise the fact that His purpose is immutable, unchangeable, confirmed it with an oath, 18 so that by two immutable, unchangeable things in which it is impossible for God to lie, we might have strong comfort who have fled for refuge to take hold of the hope set before us. 19 This hope we have as an anchor of the soul, a hope both certain, loyal and forceful, reliable and one which enters into the house the parochet inner veil [the veil hung before the holy of holies], 20 where Yeshua has entered as a forerunner for us, having become a high priest forever according to the word, order, type, style, arrangement of Melkiy Tzedek.” -Hebrews 6:13-20 (Author’s translation)
 
22 by the same extent Yeshua[H] also has become the guarantee of a better covenant.
 
“better covenant” The Brit HaChadashah, New Covenant in Yeshua is better because it atones forever, saving unto eternal life those who enter into it, unlike the temporary blood of animals which cannot fully purge sin from the human soul.
 
We note that the better covenant is made with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, the ethnic religious descendants of Jacob and is accessible to the nations through the Jew Yeshua Who is also God with us. Failing to understand the Brit HaChadashah, New Covenant in these terms leads to the satanic teaching of Replacement Theologies which the modern Christian Church continues to proliferate under various pseudonyms such as “Supersessionism, Continuationism, Successionism” etc.
 
“‘The days are coming,’ declares the Lord, ‘when I will make a new covenant with the people of Israel and with the people of Judah.’” -Jeremiah 31:31 NIV
 
This covenant promised by God through Jeremiah does not do away with the former covenant but fully fills it. Just as it is wrong to say Torah observance is obligatory for the Messiah follower, it is also wrong to say that Torah is now obsolete. Torah remains to indict against sin until the end of the age.
 
23 The former priests, on the one hand, existed in greater numbers because they were prevented by death from continuing; 24 Yeshua[H], on the other hand, because He continues, abides, dwells, remains forever, has an immutable, unchanging priesthood.
 
Notice that this all concerns Yeshua’s priesthood which has always existed in God. And that His priesthood, while likened to that of the mortal Melkiy Tzedek, is nonetheless distinguished from it as being superior to it. Immutable, unchanging.
 
25 Therefore, He is also able (dunamai[G]) to save to the full end, perfectly, forever (pantelēs[G], lehushiya teshuat[H]) those who come to God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]) through Him, since He always lives (zao[G], chay[H]) to make intercession (entugchanō[G]) for them. 26 For it was fitting for us to have such a high priest (archiereus[G], Kohen Gadol[H]), holy (hosios[G], kadosh[H]), innocent (akakos[G]), undefiled (amiantos[G]), separated (chōrizō[G]) from sinners (hamartōlos[G]), and made (ginomai[G]) higher (hupsēlos[G]) than the heavens (Ouranos[G], hashamayim[H]);
 
25 Therefore, He is also able to save to the full end, perfectly, forever those who come to God through Him, since He always lives to make intercession for them.
 
“Therefore will I divide Him a portion with the great, and He shall divide the spoil with the strong; because He has poured out His soul unto death: and He was numbered with the transgressors; and He bare the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.” -Isaiah 53:12
 
26 For it was fitting for us to have such a high priest, holy, innocent, undefiled, separated from sinners, and made higher than the heavens;
 
“He who descended is the very one who ascended higher than all the heavens, in order to fill the whole universe.” -Ephesians 4:10 NIV
 
“For what the Torah could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh:” -Romans 8:3
 
27 who does not need to offer sacrifices daily (kata hēmera[G], yom yom[H]), like those high priests (archiereus[G], koheniym gedoliym[H]), first for His own sins [missing the mark set by God’s holiness] (hamartia[G]) and then for the sins of the people (laos[G], ha’am[H]), because He did this once for all (ephapax[G]) when He offered up (anapherō[G]) His soul (nafsho[H]). 28 For the Torah[H] appoints men as high priests (archiereus[G], koheniym gedoliym[H]) who are infirm, weak (astheneia[G]), but the word, essence, substance (logos[G], devar[H]) of the oath (horkōmosia[G]), which came after the Torah[H], appoints a Son (uihos[G], haben[H]), who has been made consecrated (teleioō[G], na’aleh[H]) forever (eis aion[G], bishleimot netzakh[H]).
 
27 who does not need to offer sacrifices daily, like those high priests, first for His own sins [missing the mark set by God’s holiness] and then for the sins of the people, because He did this once for all when He offered up His soul. 
 
“15 For we do not have a high priest Who is unable to sympathize, have compassion with our weaknesses, but One who has been tempted, tried, examined, proved in all things just as we are, yet without sin [missing the mark set by God’s holiness].” -Hebrews 4:15 (Author’s translation)
 
28 For the Torah[H] appoints men as high priests who are infirm, weak, but the word, essence, substance of the oath, which came after the Torah[H], appoints a Son, who has been made consecrated forever.
 
The oath in Psalms 110:4 was spoken by David in the Holy Spirit centuries after the giving of the Torah at Sinay, and appoints a Son who has been consecrated as an everlasting Priest.
 
The Word (logos[G]/Davar[H]) of the oath and the Son appointed are one and the same. The Word Who came after the Torah in chronology (time and space) is also the Author of the Torah. He is all existing.
 
NB: For an explanation of the order of Melkiy Tzedek’s priesthood and why Melkiy Tzedek is not Yeshua, please read my commentary on Hebrews 5.
 
Copyright 2021 Yaakov Brown

Introduction:
 
Yeshua was introduced as Kohen HaGadol at 2:17 and the writer of Hebrews has explained Yeshua’s role in likeness to that of Melkiy Tzedek the ancient priest of Salem in a drash (comparative teaching) begun in chapter 4 and expanded in chapter 5. In preparation for further explanation regarding the priesthood of Messiah as it relates to the priesthood of Melkiy Tzedek, the writer now continues this exposition of Psalms 110:4 (Heb. 4:14-7:28) in chapter 6, first with a warning against experiential faith and then explaining God’s immutably reliable promise and oath to Abraham as an example of His trustworthiness in relationship to salvation through Yeshua the Great High Priest of an everlasting atonement.
 
It’s important to understand that what is taught in this chapter regarding those who have experienced the gifts of God’s redemptive purpose and even partnered with the Holy Spirit, but have nonetheless failed to enter regenerative faith (are not true disciples) in Yeshua, is taught as a warning and not as a foregone conclusion.
 
As is the case with all Scripture (scrolls of the original texts), there are no chapter breaks or verse markers (or punctuation for that matter) in the scroll of the Book to the Hebrews. It’s important to see the text of this chapter as a continuation of the previous chapter, the last verses of chapter 5 being:
 
13 For everyone individually and collectively who partakes of milk is unskilful, inexperienced, ignorant, has no knowledge in the word, essence of righteousness, for that one is an infant. [cf. Isa. 7:15; re. Messiah to the contrary: His spiritual maturity exceeded His physical growth] 14 But strong food, oiled bread [fat bread] is for the mature, who by reason have their senses, perception vigorously trained, exercised, their hearts, core being, inner person, examined to distinguish, discern between good and evil.
 
BOOK TO THE HEBREWS Chapter 6 (Author’s translation)
 
1Therefore, upon what’s been said, leaving, turning from the beginning, cornerstones, foundation stones of the word, essences, instructions of the Messiah, let us bring, go up to maturity, not laying, returning again (to) a foundation of repentance, turning around, change of mind, from dead corpse-like works and of faith, belief, assurance, trust toward, on God, 
2 of instructions, doctrines, taught things about immersions, washings, baptisms and laying on of hands, and about the resurrection of the dead and judgment, damnation, condemnation everlasting, in perpetual world. 
3 And this we will do, if God allows, permits, gives licence.
4 For it is impotent, weak in the case of those who have once been enlightened, illuminated, seen the light [alt. have already lifted up their eyes to the light: alt. #2 have descended to immersion[A]], and have tasted, eaten of the heavenly gift and have been made partakers, partners of the Holy Spirit, 
5 and have tasted, eaten the good breathed word of God and the powers, miracles of the world to come,
6 If they also then fall away, to renew them again to repentance, returning, because they again crucify to themselves the Son of God and put Him to public shame. 
7 For the land that drinks the rain which often falls on it, and produces herbs/vegetation of good seed useful to those who farm it, receives a spoken blessing from God;
8 but if it bears thorns and thistles, it is castaway, worthless, rejected and very close to being cursed, and its end is in being burned.
9 But now, dear ones/beloved, we are persuaded, convinced, trusting of better things regarding you, and things possessed in salvation, even though we must speak in this way.
10 For God is not unjust, unrighteous so as to forget your work and labour of charitable holistic love which you have shown toward His Name, in that you have served, ministered to the holy [set apart] ones and continue to serve today. 
11 And we desire that every one of you show the same diligence, forwardness, urgency so as to realize the full confidence of faith, trust, hope until the goal,
12 so that you will not be dull, stupid, sluggish, lazy but followers, imitators, walking in the way of those who through faith, belief, assurance, fidelity, trust and patience, endurance, perseverance, in their spirit inherit the promises.
13 For when God made a promise to Avraham, since He could swear an oath by no one greater, He swore by Himself, on His own soul,
14 saying, “indeed, for blessing I will bless you and multiplying I will multiply you [your seed/progeny].” [ Gen. 22:17] 
15 And so, having patiently waited in his spirit, he obtained the promise. 
16 For indeed people swear an oath by one greater, and taking an oath serves as confirmation to them, an end of all strife, dispute, contradiction between them.
17 In the same way God, desiring more abundantly to demonstrate to the heirs of the promise the fact that His purpose is immutable, unchangeable, confirmed it with an oath, 
18 so that by two immutable, unchangeable things in which it is impossible for God to lie, we might have strong comfort who have fled for refuge to take hold of the hope set before us.
19 This hope we have as an anchor of the soul, a hope both certain, loyal and forceful, reliable and one which enters into the house the parochet inner veil [the veil hung before the holy of holies], 
20 where Yeshua has entered as a forerunner for us, having become a high priest forever according to the word, order, type, style, arrangement of Melkiy Tzedek.
 
HEBREWS 6 (line upon line)
 
1Therefore, upon what’s been said (al kein[H]) leaving, turning from (aphiēmi[G], mei’avneiy pinah[H]) the beginning, cornerstones, foundation stones (arche[G]) of the word, essences, instructions (logos[G], davar[H], alt. betorat[H]) of the Messiah (Christos[G], ha-Mashiyach[H]), let us bring, go up (pherō̄[G], vena’aleh[H]) to maturity (teleiotēs[G], ad-tachliyta[H]), not (velo[H]) laying, returning (kataballō[G], nashuv[H]) again (to) a foundation (themelios[G], et-hatsod[H]) of repentance, turning around, change of mind (metanoia[G], liteshuvah[H]), from dead corpse-like (nekros[G]) works (ergon[G], min-ma’asiym asher mavet[H]) and of faith, belief, assurance, trust (pistis[G], emunat[H]) toward, on (epi[G]) God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]), 2 of instructions, doctrines, taught things (didachē[G], diyn[H]) about immersions, washings, baptisms (baptismos[G], hateviylot[H]) and laying on (epithesis[G], smiychat[H]) of hands (cheir[G], yadayim[H]), and about the resurrection (anastasis[G], utekumat[H]) of the dead (nekros[G], hameitiym[H]) and judgment, damnation, condemnation (krima[G], umishpat[H]) everlasting, in perpetual world (aiōnios[G], olam[H]). 3 And this we will do, if God allows, permits, gives, licences (Theos epitrepō[G], birtzot haEl[H]).
 
Within the first two verses of this chapter, six foundational doctrines are alluded to:
 
1.Repentance – turning away from sin and toward God
2.Faith in God – the receipt of God and His sacrificial love in Yeshua by grace
3.Immersions – full immersion in the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, the consecration of the body of believers, individually and corporately as priests under the Great High Priest Yeshua
4.Laying on of hands – the conferring and imparting of authority in Messiah, of God
5.Resurrection of the dead – the resurrection of all who have passed at the end of the present sin affected world/age
6.Eternal Judgement/Punishment – the destiny of all who refuse God’s offer of redemptive, vicarious, sacrificial love
 
The foundational doctrines of our faith community, which are for both Jewish believers and are given via Jewish believers to Gentiles (so that all believers have access to them), are established not in the writings of so called Gentile “Church Fathers”, but in the writings of the true fathers of the body of believers (Jews), appointed by God and inspired by the Holy Spirit.
 
We do not base our core beliefs and doctrines on the Nicene creeds of Christendom but on the Scriptures (Genesis to Revelation).
 
As I have stated many times, prior to the Hellenization of the known world (323-33 B.C.E) there was no word in the Hebrew language for “theology”. In short, Biblical Judaism teaches faith in action, it is not creedal but functional (to our shame as Jews, post temple Rabbinical Judaism eventually developed into a creedal religion in a polemic attempt to stem the influence of Christianity).
 
1Therefore, upon what’s been said, leaving, turning from the beginning, cornerstones, foundation stones of the word, essences, instructions of the Messiah, let us bring, go up to maturity, not laying, returning again (to) a foundation of repentance, turning around, change of mind, from dead corpse-like works and of faith, belief, assurance, trust toward, on God,
 
This verse sets up the context for the subsequent verses of admonishment regarding experiential faith (v.4 – 8). The writer is essentially saying that there is no need for someone who has genuinely received Yeshua and is living according to repentance to return to a fundamental understanding of salvation because that person already has the understanding required to form a foundation for maturity.
 
“Therefore” Because the ability to distinguish between good and evil requires a believer to walk in the discipline of maturity (5:13-14).
 
“leaving foundational instruction of the Messiah” Moving forward, not leaving behind. Note that it is, teaching concerning the Messiah that is at the heart of maturity. Therefore, the milk is important, and a beginning, but must be added to with strong food unto maturity.
 
“let us go up” Is from the Hebrew translation and denotes making Aliyah, going up to Jerusalem for one of the regaliym (three aliyot, or going up moediym appointed times/festivals: Pesach, Shavuot, and Sukkot)[The three “P”s: Passover, Pentecost and Pup-tents]. In short, rather than returning to a base understanding of what it means to be part of the believing community, let’s instead celebrate the festivals of the mature, delighting in the learning gleaned from a rhythm of righteous action set out and fuelled by God for our good.
 
“not laying again a foundation of repentance” If we have truly repented and are walking in repentance, what need do we have of repenting? Except if we are not truly saved. Therefore, the writer is speaking a warning to those among the believing Jewish community who walk in pretentious experiential faith (some being self-deluded and in need of a wakeup call, others wilfully rebellious and in need of the life changing regeneration of Yeshua’s saving work).
 
“and of faith on God” Faith is a living and ongoing relational journey and not a time trapped decision or benign act of mental assent.
 
2 of instructions, doctrines, taught things about immersions, washings, baptisms and laying on of hands, and about the resurrection of the dead and judgment, damnation, condemnation everlasting, in perpetual world.
 
“Immersions, washings” This refers to the ritual washing of tevilah ba’mikveh (immersion in the ritual washing pool or other living water source), the washing of priests through ritual consecration in preparation for offerings made before the face of God, the immersion of Yochanan the Immerser (John the Baptist), the immersion of Yeshua’s disciples, the immersion of the Holy Spirit, which began at Shavuot[H] (Pentecost[G]), and the trifold immersion commanded by Yeshua, which unites all immersions from the mikveh (gathering of waters) at creation, to the mikveh of Noah (saved through the flood waters), to the mikveh of the Red Sea (Israel’s immersion unto freedom), to the mikveh of the Jordan (Israel’s immersion unto the promised land: a shadow of the eternal land), to all the aforementioned mikvot and unto the fullness of their prophetic goal in Messiah’s life, death and resurrection.
 
The fullness of Yeshua’s mikvot (immersions, washings) are understood as foundational to true faith. Therefore, the mikveh (immersion) of Yeshua incorporates all immersions and consecrates the believer as a priest under Yeshua immersed in the Godhead (1 Peter 2:9 [note that in the context of 1 Peter 2:9 Peter is speaking to Jewish believers, just as the writer of the book to the Hebrews is here]).
 
“Laying on of hands” is a Hebraic (Jewish) idiom that denotes the appointing or passing on of authority. It is seen in action in relation to immersion and the gift of the Holy Spirit (Acts 8:16-17; 19:5-6), where the laying of hands is symbolic, while the Spirit is given of God. It is important to note that the one who lays hands is not giving the gift of the Holy Spirit (a blasphemous notion) but that the laying of hands is a symbol of the conferring of authority. Thus, a child of God is given the Holy Spirit as a sign of authority in Messiah unto God.
 
Laying on of hands is seen in the commissioning and ordaining of kingdom workers (Acts 6:6; 13:3; 1 Tim. 4:14; 5:22; 2 Tim. 1:6), in the healing of the sick (Mk. 6:5; 16:18; Lk. 4:40; Acts 28:8), and in the imparting of blessing (Matt. 19:13-15). On all of these occasions the conferring or imparting of authority is the primary meaning, which is then outworked by the power of God in the life of the believer.
 
“resurrection of the dead” Yeshua, the Perushiym (Pharisees) [Mishnah Sot. 9:15; Mishnah San. 10:1], and the first century Messianic Jews all accepted the resurrection of the dead at the end of the age unto judgement, as foundational doctrine. There is no need to relearn immutable things. They are firmly established.
 
“judgement/punishment everlasting” Eternal punishment is not to be questioned. Those who question its reality prove themselves unbelievers and apostate. This is a harsh indictment on the first century Jewish believing community but it is an even harsher indictment on the modern western church, which has become saturated in the false doctrines of “Temporal punishment”, “salvation after death”, “annihilationism” and numerous other satanic lies.
 
Eternal judgement (meaning that the consequences of Gods final judgement are eternal both with regard to life and to death) was a commonly accepted doctrine of Biblical and first century Judaism, and remains so in the true remnant among Messianic Jews (Isa. 66:22-24; Ezek. 34:17-22; Dan. 7:26; 12:1-2; Ezra. 7:33-44; Matt. 218:6-9; 5:31-46; Mark. 9:42-48; Rom. 2:7; 2 Thess. 1:5-10; Jude 7; 13; Rev. 14:9-11; 20:10, 14-15).
 
Eternal punishment is not the same as the temporal punishment of Gehenna (Mishnah Qidd. 14:4; Mishnah Ed. 2:10; Mishnah Avot 1:5; 5:19-20). Gehenna is that part of sheol (holding place of the departed) where the wicked await the final resurrection and judgement, after which they are thrown into the lake of perpetual fire prepared for the Devil and his angels (Rev. 20:10, 14-15). The confusion many have with regard to eternal punishment is based on a misunderstanding between temporal punishment (Gehenna) and eternal punishment (lake of fire), both of which are taught in Scripture, the latter being the ultimate destination of the unsaved.
 
3 And this we will do, if God allows, permits, gives licence.
 
Our maturity is entirely reliant on God. We receive it and in His strength walk in it. Immaturity is the product of both the misbelief that we can earn God’s favour, and its counterpart, the misbelief that we have no need of God’s favour. Both are idolatry.
 
What Verses 4 to 6 Teach:
 
Verses 4 to 6 are often used in support of the false idea that one can lose salvation. That is not the case. If it were, salvation, reliant on Yeshua, would be unreliable, thus impugning God’s character. In fact, what verses 4 to 6 teach, is that experiential faith is not true faith. That those who may have appeared to have been true disciples can at times be proven to be pretenders (knowingly or unknowingly [self-deluded]). The warning of these verses is subsequent to and based on the warning connected to the disbelieving generation of Israelites alluded to in Hebrews 3:7- 4:13. It is a warning to those who profess faith but whose apostacy proves they have no such faith (cf. 1 John 2:19).
 
If one has turned against the light he has supposedly received he has convinced himself that the light was false. Anyone, who having met Yeshua the Light of the world can at a later date say that Yeshua is not God with us, has by the evidence of his admission, not received Yeshua, and therefore, has never been a true disciple. In other words, the Light they claim to have received they have never known.
 
Allowing one’s self to be temporarily influenced by faith in Yeshua is not the same as entering an eternal faith relationship in Yeshua. The former attaches faith to a fallen human lifestyle, like a fashion accessory that is purchased to match a certain outfit, and is subsequently tossed away when the outfit is no longer fashionable. The latter submits the human soul to God in Yeshua, recognising His rule over every part of existence.
 
What is clear is that these verses warn any among the body of first century Jewish believers who are not genuine disciples, of the danger facing them if they do not repent and walk in true faith. The cutting off of such apostates reflects the ancient Jewish “karet” (cut off) punishment where certain violations of Torah such as idolatry, incest etc. result in exclusion from the community (Ex. 12:15, 19; Lev. 18:29; 20:3; 23:29).
 
There is a similar halakhah taught by Rav Shaul and based on the Torah is conveyed to all believers, with regard to the incestuous sexually immoral brother:
 
“Cut off the evil person from among yourselves!” -1 Corinthians 5:13 (Deut. 13:5; 17:7; 19:19; 21:21; 22:21,24; 24:7)
 
Rav Shaul speaks in a similar way in his first letter to Timothy:
 
“19 holding on to faith and a good conscience, which some have rejected and so have suffered shipwreck with regard to the faith. 20 Among them are Hymenaeus and Alexander, whom I have handed over to Satan to be taught not to blaspheme.” -1 Timothy 1:19-20
 
In the case of the Messianic community “karet” is intended to produce suffering unto repentance. “The Lord disciplines the ones He loves” (Psa. 94:12, 118:18; Prov. 3:12; Jer. 30:11, 46:28; Heb. 12:6).
 
4 For it is impotent, weak (adunatos[G]) in the case of those who have once been enlightened, illuminated, seen the light [alt. have already lifted up their eyes to the light: alt. #2 have descended to immersion[A]] (phōtizō[G], oru eiyneiyhem[H]), and have tasted, eaten (geuomai[G]) of the heavenly (ho epouranios[G], shamayim[H]) gift (dōrea[G], matan[H]) and have been made (ginomai[G]) partakers, partners (metochos[G]) of the Holy (hagios[G]) Spirit (pneuma[G], Ruach HaKodesh[H]), 5 and have tasted, eaten (geuomai[G]) the good (kalos[G], hatov[H]) breathed word (rhema[G], et devar[H]) of God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]) and the powers, miracles (dunamis[G], nifleot[H]) of the world to come (aiōn mellō[G], haolam heatiyd[H]),
 
4 For it is impotent, weak in the case of those who have once been enlightened, illuminated, seen the light [alt. have already lifted up their eyes to the light: alt. #2 have descended to immersion[A]], and have tasted, eaten of the heavenly gift and have been made partakers, partners of the Holy Spirit, 5 and have tasted, eaten the good breathed word of God and the powers, miracles of the world to come,
 
“Impossible” (NASB) is a poor, even misleading translation of the Greek adunatos. In the context of Hebrews 4 through 5, weak, infantile faith is being challenged. Therefore, “weak, impotent” both valid translations, better convey the contextual meaning of adunatos.
 
Notice that those being spoken of have “seen the light, tasted, eaten, partaken, partnered” but have not continued. Nowhere here is it said that these ones have become disciples or appliers of the faith. Nor have their experiences of God caused them to practice faith. In reality this denotes a person who, like those alluded to in the mashal (parable) of the sower, has failed to grow, mature, fruit, and produce progeny (Matthew 13:1–23, Mark 4:1–20, Luke 8:4–15).
 
Hearing, knowing (in an intellectual sense), tasting, consuming, even temporarily partnering with the Holy Spirit, are all experiential things. Even in the case of the Holy Spirit, one can experience His presence and manifest power and still decide not to continue to partner with Him. Feeling the Holy Spirit is not the same as the Holy Spirit indwelling a person. The Tanakh speaks of the Holy Spirit coming upon even faithless people like king Saul.
 
Experiential or emotional faith is of no value in times of trouble, nor does it manifest lasting change. Essentially, the writer of the Book to the Hebrews, inspired by the Holy Spirit, is teaching that experiential faith (as it is manifest in the temporal sin affected world) is not true faith.
 
Any modern believer who has experienced goosebumps at a corporate worship music event and on a separate occasion during a secular rock concert, has the common sense to realise that goosebumps are no more evidence of the Holy Spirit than a man’s physiological response to a woman’s body is evidence of love. Experience may be a part of faith but it is not synonymous with true faith.
 
6 If they also (kai[G]) then fall away (parapiptō[G]), to renew (anakainizō[G]) them again (palin[G]) to repentance, returning (metanoia[G], velashuv[H]), because (kiy[H]) they again crucify (anastauroō[G], hitzliyvu[H]) to themselves the Son of God (uihos Theos[G], Ben Elohiym[H]) and put Him to public shame (paradeigmatizō[G]). 7 For the land (gē[G], ha’aretz[H]) that drinks (pinō[G], hashotah[H]) the rain (huetos[G], et hageshem[H]) which often falls on it, and produces herbs/vegetation (botanē[G]) of good seed (zera tov[H]) useful to those who farm it (geōrgeō[G]), receives (metalambanō[G]) a spoken blessing (eulogia[G], verachah[H]) from God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]);
 
6 If they also then fall away, to renew them again to repentance, returning, because they again crucify to themselves the Son of God and put Him to public shame.
 
It would be wrong to understand the present text as teaching loss of salvation. Note the qualifying phrase “If they also then fall away”, which is a warning and not a forgone conclusion. In reality it is teaching that those who have not repented genuinely in the first place, cannot return to repentance because they have entirely misunderstood what repentance is. By definition, if one needs to return to repentance he has clearly not repented (because true repentance is to turn and continue in the right direction) but considers he has (is self-deluded), how then can he repent (return)?
 
“Because they again crucify to themselves the Son of God” This shows that they did not understand the work of Messiah’s crucifixion in the first place. The crucifixion of Messiah meant Him becoming a sin sacrifice on our behalf, having taken on Himself the sin (past, present and future) of the repentant. To fall away is to prove that our faith was based on nothing more than a shallow understanding, seeded in soil devoid of depth.
 
7 For the land that drinks the rain which often falls on it, and produces herbs/vegetation of good seed useful to those who farm it, receives a spoken blessing from God;
 
Good seed produces good fruit. The rain represents the Word Yeshua, the Gospel, the Holy Spirit. The land represents the hearts of human beings (in the present context specifically Jews). The good seed here is not the Gospel as it is in Yeshua’s parable, rather it represents the truly regenerated Messiah follower.
​
8 but if it bears thorns (akantha[G]) and thistles (tribolos[G]), it is castaway, worthless, rejected (adokimos[G]) and very close (eggus[G]) to being cursed (katara[G]), and its end (telos[G]) is in being burned (kausis[G], l’vaeir[H]). 9 But now (de[G]), dear ones/beloved (agapētos[G], yediydiym[H]), we are persuaded, convinced, trusting (peithō[G]) of better things (kreittōn[G], devariym toviym[H]) regarding (peri[G]) you, and things possessed (echō[G]) in salvation (sōtēria[G], yeshuah[H]), even though we must speak (laleō[G]) in this way (houtō[G]).

8 but if it bears thorns and thistles, it is castaway, worthless, rejected and very close to being cursed, and its end is in being burned.
 
Note that thorns and thistles are of different seed. The point here is that anyone who produces thorns and thistles is proven by their fruit to have never received the seed of faith in Yeshua in the first place. This therefore, does not teach loss of salvation but is proof of a lack of genuine salvation, which is received and walked in rather than agreed to and disregarded.
 
The teaching of these verses identifies those who have had every opportunity to receive salvation through genuine faith but have instead merely pretended (sometimes even deluding themselves) to have entered into true faith. Thus, the seed of the sinful nature has not been replaced by the seed of faith in Messiah.
 
These verses convey the teaching of Messiah:
 
“If anyone does not remain in Me, he is like a branch that is  thrown away and dries up; such branches are picked up and thrown into the fire and burned.” -Yochanan (John) 15:6
 
Notice the qualifying phrase “If anyone does not remain in Me”, which correlates to “if they also then fall away”.
 
9 But now, dear ones/beloved, we are persuaded, convinced, trusting of better things regarding you, and things possessed in salvation, even though we must speak in this way.
 
These words affirm that the writer and those who lead the wider Jewish believing community with him, are aware that the majority among them are faithful disciples and that the warning is needed only for the few who have yet to show true repentance and the fruit of ongoing faith.
 
10 For God (Theos[G], Ha-Elohiym[H]) is not unjust, unrighteous (adikos[G]) so as to forget (epilanthanomai[G], yishkach[H]) your work (ergon[G]) and labour (kopos[G], amal[H]) of charitable holistic love (agapē[G], ahavatchem[H]) which you have shown toward His Name (onoma[G], lishmo[H]), in that you have served, ministered (diakoneō[G]) to the holy [set apart] ones (hagios[G], likdoshayv[H]) and continue to serve today (diakoneō[G], gam hayom[H]). 11 And we desire (epithumeō[G]) that every one of you (hekastos[G], iysh iysh[H]) show (endeiknumi[G]) the same diligence, forwardness, urgency (spoudē[G]) so as to realize the full confidence (plērophoria[G], ne’emanah[H]) of faith, trust, hope (elpis[G], tikvato[H]) until the goal (telos[G], ad haeitz[H]),
 
10 For God is not unjust, unrighteous so as to forget your work and labour of charitable holistic love which you have shown toward His Name, in that you have served, ministered to the holy [set apart] ones and continue to serve today. 
 
God’s nature is described as the foundation of the security of those who in true faith continue to minister in Yeshua. These ones are not those who are rebuked for experiential faith but are those who are true disciples.
 
Notice the meaning of the now entirely misunderstood English word “saints”. Where many modern denominations venerate only certain individuals as “saints” (the greatest offenders being the Roman Catholic Church), Biblical Judaism understands “saints” as kedoshiym (holy, set apart ones). Throughout the Tanakh (OT) the phrase “My holy ones” has always referred to the righteous remnant of Israel (the ethnic descendants of Jacob).
 
11 And we desire that every one of you show the same diligence, forwardness, urgency so as to realize the full confidence of faith, trust, hope until the goal,
 
“we desire” Reaffirms that the writer of the Book to the Hebrews is one of a group of Messianic Jewish leaders who are in agreement over the teaching of this work, and its application to the wider body of Jewish Messiah followers of the first century C.E.
 
We note that the faithful are admonished to show diligent forward momentum in acting out their faith because that same living faith assures them of the certain hope they have in Messiah unto the goal of eternal life made manifest in the full revelation of the world to come (Olam haba). True faith could be likened to a hybrid vehicle, following the ignition of the fuel by the battery the motion of the vehicle recharges the battery and produces additional power in order to sustain travel to the destination.
 
12 so that you will not be dull, stupid, sluggish, lazy (nōthros[G]) but followers, imitators, walking in the way (mimētēs[G], im teilchun[H]) of those who through faith, belief, assurance, fidelity, trust (pistis[G], be’emunatam[H]) and patience, endurance, perseverance (makrothumia[G], veorekh[H]) in their spirit (rucham[H]) inherit (klēronomeō[G]) the promises (epaggelia[G], et hahavtachot[H]).13 For when God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]) made a promise (epaggellō[G], hivtiyach[H]) to Avraham[H] (Father of many peoples), since He could swear (omnuō[G], lehishavah[H]) an oath by no one greater (meizōn[G], eiyn gadol[H]), He swore (omnuō[G]) by Himself, on His own soul (heautou[G], nishba benafsho[H]),
 
12 so that you will not be dull, stupid, sluggish, lazy but followers, imitators, walking in the way of those who through faith, belief, assurance, fidelity, trust and patience, endurance, perseverance, in their spirit inherit the promises.
 
Chapter 11 lists numerous examples of those who have lived lives of faith that reflect the faith being alluded to by the writer of the Book to the Hebrews.
 
In the context of the Book to the Hebrews, the promises (plural) are those made to the Jewish people in and through Abraham, reaffirmed and conferred onto Isaac and Jacob. These promises include progeny, the land of Israel and eternal covenant (unto life everlasting) [Gen. 12:2-3; 15:5; 17:5].
 
The promises of God in Yeshua, like those made to the faithful ones of the past, are established for those who maintain faith in His strength.
 
We note that affirmation of the promises (plural) precede the singling out of the promise of progeny used as an example in the next verse.
 
13 For when God made a promise to Avraham, since He could swear an oath by no one greater, He swore by Himself, on His own soul,
 
As Creator of all, nothing and no one is superior to God. Thus, with regard to the human practice of swearing to one greater, God must be described as having sworn by Himself, because there is none greater.
 
14 saying (legō[G], vayomeir[H]), “indeed, for (e men[G], kiy[H]) blessing (eulogeō[G], bareikh[H]) I will bless (eulogeō[G], avarechecha[H]) you and multiplying (plēthunō[G], veharbah[H]) I will multiply (plēthunō[G], harbeh[H]) you [your seed/progeny].” [ Gen. 22:17] 15 And so, having patiently waited in his spirit (makrothumeō[G], rucho[H]), he obtained (epitugchanō[G]) the promise (epaggelia[G], et hahavtachah[H]). 16 For indeed (men[G], kiy amnam[H]) people (anthrōpos[G], anashiym[H]) swear (omnuō[G], hashvua[H]) an oath by one greater (meizōn[G], begadol[H]), and taking an oath serves as confirmation (bebaiōsis[G]) to them, an end (peras[G], yaviy keitz[H]) of all (pas[G], lekhol[H]) strife, dispute, contradiction (antilogia[G], riyv[H]) between them (beiyneiyhem[H]).
 
14 saying, “indeed, for blessing I will bless you and multiplying I will multiply you [your seed/progeny].” [ Gen. 22:17] 15 And so, having patiently waited in his spirit, he obtained the promise. 16 For indeed people swear an oath by one greater, and taking an oath serves as confirmation to them, an end of all strife, dispute, contradiction between them.
 
“Indeed blessing I will bless you, and multiplying I will multiply your seed as the stars of the heavens and as the sand, which is on the seashore; and your seed shall possess the gate [place of governance] of their enemies.” -Bereishit (Genesis) 22:17 (Author’s translation from Hebrew text)
 
This blessing spoken over Abraham is a beginning of blessings (plural) and must not be understood to be a reference to the limited blessing of progeny alone.
 
15 And so, having patiently waited in his spirit, he obtained the promise. 
 
With regard to the specific blessing of progeny Abraham waited 25 years to receive the promise (Gen. 12:3-4; 17:2; 18:10; 21:5). Thus, he “obtained” the promise of progeny through Isaac, whom Messiah redeemed, as prefigured in the Ram (Gen. 22). Thus, Jacob is redeemed by Messiah (the Ram of God) in the loins of Isaac.
 
And with regard to the eternal covenant and the world to come Abraham died still holding on in faith to the yet to be seen reality of “a city which has foundations, whose builder and maker is God” (Heb. 11:10). Abraham exemplifies faithful trust in God, even faith unto death, a faith that prefigures that of Messiah chronologically speaking, and is established in Messiah before the foundation of the world, outside of time and space.
 
17 In the same way God (Theos[G], ha-Elohiym[H]), desiring (boulomai[G]) more abundantly (perissoteron[G]) to demonstrate (epideiknumi[G]) to the heirs (klēronomos[G], et yoresheiy[H]) of the promise (epaggelia[G], hahavtachah[H]) the fact that His purpose is immutable, unchangeable (ametathetos[G]), confirmed (mesiteuō[G]) it with an oath (horkos[G], bishvuato[H]), 18 so that by two immutable, unchangeable (ametathetos[G]) things in which it is impossible (adunatos[G]) for God (Theos[G], Ha-Elohiym[H]) to lie (pseudomai[G], lechazeiv[H]), we might have strong (ischuros[G], lehachaziyk[H]) comfort (paraklēsis[G]) who have fled for refuge (katapheugō[G]) to take hold (krateō[G]) of the hope (elpis[G], batikvah[H]) set before us (prokeimai[G]).
 
17 In the same way God, desiring more abundantly to demonstrate to the heirs of the promise the fact that His purpose is immutable, unchangeable, confirmed it with an oath,
 
It’s important to note that the first century Jewish audience understands the heirs of the promise made to Abraham as being the Israelites, given that the promises made to Abraham were ratified through Isaac and Jacob and are seen to have been passed on to Jacob’s descendants in perpetuity. This does not mean that Gentiles have no access, but that Gentiles have access through Yeshua the Jew, just as Jews receive the fullness of the promises through Yeshua.
 
18 so that by two immutable, unchangeable things in which it is impossible for God to lie, we might have strong comfort who have fled for refuge to take hold of the hope set before us.
 
Based on His nature God cannot lie. Therefore, the two things concerning Abraham a. the promise b. the oath, are immutable, unchangeable. These afford the faithful Jewish believers comfort, knowing that having fled the sinful ways of humanity, and the hypocrisy of vain religion, they have taken hold of a hope as certain as that of Abraham.
 
19 This hope we have as an anchor (agkura[G]) of the soul (psuchē[G], lenefesh[H]), a hope both certain, loyal (asphalēs[G], ne’eman[H]) and forceful, reliable (bebaios[G], vechazak[H]) and one which enters (eiserchomai[G]) into (eis[G]) the house (el mibeiyt[H]) the inner (esōteros[G]) veil [the veil hung before the holy of holies] (katapetasma[G], laparochet[H]), 20 where Yeshua[H] (Iēsous[G], Joshua, YHVH saves) has entered (eiserchomai[G]) as a forerunner (prodromos[G]) for us, having become a high priest (archiereus[G], lekohen gadol[H]) forever (eis aiōn[G], leolam[H]) according to the word, order, type, style, arrangement (taxis[G], al divratiy[H]) of Melkiy Tzedek[H] (My king of righteousness).
 
19 This hope we have as an anchor of the soul, a hope both certain, loyal and forceful, reliable and one which enters into the house the inner veil parochet[H] [the veil hung before the holy of holies], 20 where Yeshua has entered as a forerunner for us, having become a high priest forever according to the word, order, type, style, arrangement of Melkiy Tzedek.
 
The hope that the believer has in Messiah Yeshua is like a strong anchor that holds a boat sure and secure in the midst of a storm. However, while a ship’s anchor is anchored in the rock of the sea floor, which will one day pass away, the anchor of our hope in Messiah finds purchase in the heavens upon the mercy seat of God (Who is the Rock of Israel) Who is immutable, unchanging. It is a certain hope that enters the Temple (house) and in Yeshua the Great High Priest (Lev. 16:2; Heb. 9:3) has access to the holy of holies beyond the parochet (curtain)[Ex. 26:31-35; Mk 15:38], because through His death and resurrection He has sprinkled His eternal blood upon the mercy seat of the heavenly ark and as God with us His Priesthood has made eternal atonement for those who have received Him. This being prefigured in the type of priesthood practiced by the ancient priest of Salem Melkiy Tzedek.
 
“And Yeshua cried out again with a loud voice and yielded up His spirit. And behold, the parochet (curtain) of the temple was torn in two, from top to bottom…” -Matthew 27:50-51
 
Note that Yeshua’s Priesthood is likened in type to that of Melkiy Tzedek, but His practice is prefigured in the practice of the high priests of the Aaronic (Levitical) priesthood. Melkiy Tzedek the priest of Salem had no such temple or parochet (curtain). The temple, the curtain, and the holy of holies, are given to Israel as a shadow of the heavenly things. While it is clearly of great importance to understand Yeshua’s Priesthood as being over all people of faith regardless of ethnicity, it is nonetheless equally important to understand that the shadows pointing to His redemptive work are given to the chosen, ethnic, religious people of Israel the descendants of Jacob.
 
I’m told, with some derision, that I am a zealot. Sobeit, I am zealous for HaShem in Yeshua, for His Scriptures, for my people Israel, and for the Gospel of freedom. It’s better to have angered the unteachable than to have said nothing and in so doing, stolen from the teachable.
 
NB: For an explanation of the order of Melkiy Tzedek’s priesthood and why Melkiy Tzedek is not Yeshua, please read my commentary on Hebrews 5.
 
Copyright 2021 Yaakov Brown

​Introduction:
 
Yeshua was introduced as Kohen HaGadol at 2:17. The writer now continues an exposition of Psalms 110:4 (Heb. 4:14-7:28), focusing on the role of Messiah Yeshua as Kohen HaGadol of a transcendent priesthood that is superior to that of both Aaron & Melkiy Tzedek (whose priesthood is a type ordered by Yeshua as a prophetic marker pointing to Yeshua’s Priesthood. Being that Yeshua’s Priesthood existed before creation and makes atonement possible for all who believe [1 Peter 1:19-20; Rev. 13:8]).
 
As is the case with all Scripture (scrolls of the original texts), there are no chapter breaks or verse markers (or punctuation for that matter) in the scroll of the Book to the Hebrews. It’s important to see the text of this chapter as a continuation of the previous chapter, the last verses of chapter 4 being:
 
14 Therefore, since we have a great high priest Who has passed through the heavens, Yeshua the Son of the God, let’s hold fast to our profession. 15 For we do not have a high priest Who is unable to sympathize, have compassion with our weaknesses, but One who has been tempted, tried, examined, proved in all things just as we are, yet without sin [missing the mark set by God’s holiness]. 16 Therefore let us come freely with boldness, confidently to the throne of grace, unmerited favour, practical love, so that we may receive mercy and find grace for help at the time of our need.
 
BOOK TO THE HEBREWS Chapter 5 (Author’s translation)
 
1For every [individually and collectively] high priest taken from among men [in the children of man] receives by appointment on behalf of people the things brought before the face of God [Ex. 28:1], so that he might offer both gifts, and sacrifices upon sins [missing the mark set by God’s holiness]; 2 So he is able to have compassion on those who lack knowledge and are misguided, deceived, gone astray, seduced, since he in his soul also is clothed from head to foot in weakness; 
3 also because of this he is bound, obligated to offer sacrifices for sins [missing the mark set by God’s holiness] for his soul [Lev. 9:7; 16:6], as well as for the people. 4 also no one takes, receives the honour, price, upon his soul, but receives it when he is called by the God, just as Aharon[H] also was [Num. 16:40; 18:7; 2 Chr. 26:18].
5 So too Messiah did not glorify His soul in becoming a high priest, but the One Who glorified Him was He who said to Him, “You are My Son, Today I have fathered [begotten] You” [Ps. 2:7; cf. Phil. 2:3-11]; 6 just as He also says in another place, “You are a priest forever According to the order, arrangement, fashion, style of Melkiy-tzedek[H].” [Ps. 110:4 (109:4 LXX)]
7 Who in the days of His flesh, offered up both prayers and supplications/an olive branch with powerful outcry and tears before the face of He Who was able to save Him out of death, and He was heard because He feared, held God in awe. 8 Although He was a Son, He learned, understood obedience by the things which He suffered.
9 Also having been perfected, consecrated, fulfilled He became the Author, cause, source of eternal [worlds of] salvation for all those who obey Him, 10 being called among, under, by the God as High Priest according to, upon the words of the order, arrangement, fashion, style of Melkiy-tzedek[H]. [Ps. 110:4 (109:4 LXX)]11 Concerning Him [Yeshua] we have much to say, and  difficult, heavy to explain, since you have become dull, lazy, slow, poor listeners, deaf eared.
12 For though by this time you ought to be teachers, have a master’s degree, possess a doctorate, you nonetheless need to again have someone teach you to return to the first, beginning, elementary, primary principles, rudiments, elements, cornerstones of the oracles, utterances, words, essences, instructions of the God, and you have come to need milk, baby food and not strong food, oiled bread [fat bread].
13 For everyone individually and collectively who partakes of milk is unskilful, inexperienced, ignorant, has no knowledge in the word, essence of righteousness, for that one is an infant. [cf. Isa. 7:15; re. Messiah to the contrary: His spiritual maturity exceeded His physical growth] 14 But strong food, oiled bread [fat bread] is for the mature, who by reason have their senses, perception vigorously trained, exercised, their hearts, core being, inner person, examined to distinguish, discern between good and evil.
 
HEBREWS 5 (line upon line)
 
1For every [individually and collectively] (pas[G], kol[H]) high priest (archiereus[G], kohen gadol[H]) taken from among men [in the children of man] (anthropos [G], mibeneiy adam [H]) receives (lambanō [G]) by appointment (kathistēmi [G]) on behalf (huper [G]) of people (anthropos [G], beneiy adam[H]) the things brought before the face of (pros[G], lifneiy[H]) God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]) [Ex. 28:1], so that he might offer (prospherō [G]) both gifts (dōron [G]), and sacrifices (thusia [G]) upon (al[H]) sins [missing the mark set by God’s holiness] (hamartia[G], chatotam[H]); 2 So he is able (dunamai [G]) to have compassion on (metriopatheō [G]) those who lack knowledge (agnoeō [G]) and are misguided, deceived, gone astray, seduced (planaō [G]) since he in his soul (nafsho[H]) also is clothed (perikeimai [G]) from head to foot (mikaf-regel v’ad rosh [H]) in weakness (astheneia [G]); 
 
1For every [individually and collectively] high priest taken from among men [in the children of man] receives by appointment on behalf of people the things brought before the face of God [Ex. 28:1], so that he might offer both gifts, and sacrifices upon sins [missing the mark set by God’s holiness];
 
“For every [individually and collectively] high priest taken from among men” The first century Jewish audience understood this to refer to the Levitical priesthood alone. The qualification “among men” is understood as “human being”, however, in particular, from the Jewish perspective the only human beings qualified to be high priest (being of the Levitical priesthood) were Levites of the line of Aaron via Zadok, appointed by God to intercede on behalf of all Israel. The later allusion to Melkiy Tzedek is used as a type explaining the order or blueprint for the priesthood of the King Messiah, which both precedes and proceeds the temporal priesthoods, Levitical and pre-Levitical (Melkiy Tzedek).
 
“receives by appointment on behalf of people the things brought before the face of God [Ex. 28:1]” God alone appointed the true Levitical high priests of Israel. Their role appointed by God and received in humility. The high priest was tasked with bringing the offerings and sacrifices of the people before the face of God with consecrated ritual, fear and trembling. He was responsible for the blood of the goat sacrificed (Messiah) to allow the escaping goat (Israel) to go free. This blood was brought into the holy of holies, once a year at Yom Kippur (Day of Atonement, purging, covering).
 
“so that he might offer both gifts, and sacrifices upon sins [missing the mark set by God’s holiness];” The high priest was tasked with carrying both the freewill gifts (love offerings) and the sacrifices upon sin (symbols of the need for blood atonement) before the face of God, His manifest Divine presence.
 
From the earliest days of Biblical Judaism it was understood that sin separates humanity from right relationship in God and must be atoned for through the shedding of blood. The Hebrew word mizbeach (altar) is from the root zabach (kill, slaughter, sacrifice). In fact it is a contracted form of the words mi (from) and zabach (slaughter). Therefore, everywhere in Scripture, from the earliest occurrence (Cain and Abel [inferred] Gen. 4; Noah Gen 8:20) to the last mention (Rev. 16:1), the word altar means “from slaughter/blood”. Only when it is otherwise qualified e.g. “incense altar”, does it refer to a non-slaughter altar, and even then the cost of sacrifice is connected to the application of the incense upon that specific altar.
 
2 So he is able to have compassion on those who lack knowledge and are misguided, deceived, gone astray, seduced, since he in his soul also is clothed from head to foot in weakness; 
 
The high priest in question is the sin affected human Levitical high priest (descended from Aaron). A priest who must first offer sacrifices for his own sin and that of his family before offering them on behalf of others (Lev. 6:9-13; 16:5-22). Therefore, being a sin affected human being he can relate to other sin affected human beings and is profoundly aware of his own need for atonement by blood. The Hebrew translation of the present text is beautiful, as it identifies the first (head) and final (foot) parts of the priest’s body which were consecrated by blood to symbolize the need for atonement over every part of the human soul (Ex. 29:20; Lev. 8:23-24; 14:14-28). Blood on the right ear symbolizing the need for atonement over the faculty of hearing and perception. Blood on the right thumb denoting atonement over the strength and actions. Blood on the big toe of the right foot to represent atonement over the path and direction of the soul person.
 
“those who lack knowledge and are misguided, deceived, astray, seduced” This does not refer to the wilfully unrepentant for whom there is no atonement. Forgiveness is offered to all but received only by the repentant through blood. This distinction is made clear by the Scriptures, which regard unintentional sin (Lev. 4; Num. 15:27-29; Isa. 53:6) as being different to defiant rebellion against God (Num. 15:30-31; cf. Heb. 6:4-6; 10:26-31).
 
“clothed from head to foot in weakness;” This is an allusion to the human condition. We are weak/vulnerable to sin because we live in a sin affected world, and are prone to act on the yetzer hara (evil inclination).
 
With regard to “weakness” the Mishnah Yoma 1.4, 7 recommends actions that should be practiced by the high priest in order to avoid falling asleep before the offering of the sacrifice at Yom Kippur. Weakness in and of itself is not the problem, rather giving in to temptation and using weakness as an excuse is.
 
Zechariah 3:3 describes the then (6th Century B.C.E.) high priest Yehoshua (Joshua, Yeshua) as being clothed in filthy rags (sin soiled weakness). This Joshua (Zech. 3:3), like the first Adam, was sin affected and needed to offer the temporary symbolic atonement made through animal blood in order to minister before the LORD. The Joshua (Yeshua the Messiah) Who existed before that Joshua (Zech. 3:3) and comes after him, is also clothed from head to foot in humanity, but His garments are not filthy due to sin because He remained sinless. To fit the type, Yeshua wore the unsoiled rags of humanity, whereas Joshua the high priest (Zech. 3:3) wore the soiled rags of humanity. The rags of the redeemed are of greater value than the soiled garments of kings. Joshua the high priest was of the line of Aaron, whereas Yeshua is begotten of God and born of the tribe of Judah in the line of David (king). Alternatively, Joshua the high priest dressed in filthy rags can symbolize the fact that Yeshua the Great High Priest has taken upon Himself the just punishment due for the sins of humanity.
 
Like the Levitical high priests Yeshua shared in the frailty of humanity, but unlike them He remained sinless, He did not give in to the temptation of sin (Heb. 4:15). Because sin entered the world and death with it, death comes to all who sin. A person dead in sin cannot therefore offer himself on behalf of another because a living sacrifice is required (the life is in the pumping blood). This is why it was absolutely necessary for Yeshua to remain “Living” (devoid of sin and death). So that He could offer Himself for us as a Living Sacrifice Holy and Pleasing to God. Without sacrifice Love cannot exist because in order for love to be possible the One Who offers it must risk the possibility of it being unreciprocated.
 
3 also (kai[G]) because of this (zot[H]) he is bound, obligated (opheilō[G]) to offer (prospherō[G]) sacrifices for sins [missing the mark set by God’s holiness] (hamartia[G], chatat[H]) for his soul (heautou[G], nafsho[H]) [Lev. 9:7; 16:6], as well as for the people (laos[G], ha’am[H]). 4 also (kai[G]) no one (iysh[H]) takes, receives (lambanō[G], yikach[H]) the honour, price (timē[G], et-hakavod[H]), upon his soul (heautou[G], lenafsho[H]), but receives it when he is called (kaleō[G]) by the God (ho Theos[G], Elohiym[H]), just as Aharon[H] (le’aharon[H]: Mountain, Light Bringer) also was [Num. 16:40; 18:7; 2 Chr. 26:18].
 
3 also because of this he is bound, obligated to offer sacrifices for sins [missing the mark set by God’s holiness] for his soul [Lev. 9:7; 16:6], as well as for the people.
 
The Levitical high priest must offer sacrifices for his own sin and that of his family in order to be ritually consecrated to offer sacrifices on behalf of the community (Lev. 6:9-13; 16:5-22).
 
In short, the Levitical high priesthood is revealed to be imperfect in application because of the imperfect human beings responsible for filling the role.
 
4 also no one takes, receives the honour, price, upon his soul, but receives it when he is called by the God, just as Aharon[H] also was [Num. 16:40; 18:7; 2 Chr. 26:18].
 
Aaron is mentioned because he was the first Levitical high priest appointed by God. The rosh (head, first, beginning) of the earthly Levitical priests (Ex. 28:1; Lev. 8:1-2; Num. 17:5; 18:1; Psalms 105:26). The Aaronic lineage carried on through the descendants of Zadok (2 Sam. 8:17; 1 Kings 2:27, 35) during the time of the kings. Zadok was a descendant of Phineas, son of Eleazer the son of Aaron (Ezra7:1-5).
 
During the monarchy the high priest’s role was secondary to that of the king. At that time the high priest’s authority was limited to the religious sphere. However, during the Persian period and into the Hellenistic period the high priest’s authority extended to the political realm. Thus, the Maccabees [Hasmoneans] (2nd Century B.C.E) did not receive their authority from God through genealogy (they were “bnai Hashmonay” [sons of Hashmonay], not sons of Aaron, Eleazer, Phineas, Ezra etc.) but by political self-appointment. This established precedent for the subsequent appointment of high priests. Herod the Great (72 B.C.E – 4 C.E) appointed six high priests during his reign over Judea. Therefore, like the kingship of the northern tribes (Israel/Ephraim), the apostate priesthood would come to an end.
 
We should note therefore, that the priesthood of the first century was apostate, as were its high priests. The Levitical lineage had been compromised and those acting as high priests were religious-political appointments and not God appointed.
 
As a result Jewish sects such as the Essenes, based on what they saw as an apostate (non-Scriptural) priesthood, developed their own eschatological theology regarding the kingship and priesthood of Israel. Some of the Qumran texts speak of two Messiahs, one kingly and one priestly (1QS 9:11 “the anointed one of Aaron”). Therefore, the idea of Messiah uniting the kingship and priesthood of Israel was already circulating during the first century among certain Jewish sects prior to Yeshua being revealed as King and High Priest.
 
The position of high priest was respected by Messiah Yeshua during His earthly ministry but He did not accept the first century priesthood as legitimate. In fact, the legitimate Levitical priestly line is most likely to have been that of Zechariah and Elisheva the father and mother  of Yochanan the Immerser (John the Baptist)[Luke 1:5-13; 3:2].
 
John the Immerser as a God Appointed High Priest in the Line of Aaron:
 
“5 In the days of Herod, king of Judea, there was a priest named Zechariah, of the division of Aviyah; and he had a wife from the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elisheva.” -Luke 1:5
 
Herod the Great reigned from 37 to 4 B.C.E. Long before that, during the time of King David, the priests of Israel had been arranged into 24 divisions; Aviyah (My father is YHVH) the forefather of Zechariah (John’s father) was a family head of the eighth division and a descendant of Aaron. (Nehemiah 12:12, 17; 1 Chronicles 24:1-19).
 
The meaning of Zechariah’s name (YHVH remembers) reveals that HaShem remembered His promise to bring about a new covenant, a new creation, One Who will say, “Avi-Yah,” my father is YHVH. This One (Son of God) will be heralded by the son born to Elisheva (by the oath of God), that is Yochanan (one who is favoured by God) the Immerser, who in turn will symbolically confer the priesthood of Aaron upon Messiah in submission to the High priesthood of Messiah, which is manifest in time and space in the order of Melkiy Tzedek (my king of righteousness).
 
It’s important to note that both Zechariah (1 Chronicles 24:1-19) and Elisheva (Luke 1:5) were of the line of Aaron the Kohen Gadol (The great High Priest) of Israel. Through the symbolic immersion that Yeshua received from Yochanan (John) we are able to see that Messiah unifies both the Priesthood and Kingship of Israel. The Priesthood of Aaron is symbolically submitted to the order of Melkiy Tzedek (My King of Righteousness), which is a type for the High Priesthood of Yeshua, and the position of King over Israel and the nations is something Yeshua is born to through His mother’s lineage (and symbolically through His earthly father’s lineage). Of course, ultimately Yeshua is appointed in and by God the Father.
 
All this is important because Messiah is come to reveal a greater priesthood, an eternal priesthood that has existed in Him before the foundation of the world (Psalm 110:4; Hebrews 7:17). This greater priesthood must transition within time and space from the Aaronic priesthood of Israel as it submits to Melkiy Tzedek through Abraham (Heb. 7:1-10), not so as to make the Levitical priesthood redundant but so as to cause the Levitical priesthood to fully fill its purpose and reveal the Kohen HaGadol (High Priest) Messiah Yeshua as the ultimate intermediary. 
 
Yochanan the Immerser (John the Baptist) the Son of Zechariah was a true Levite and a legitimate priest, unlike the illegitimate (political puppet) priests Annas and Caiaphas.
 
For all intents and purposes Yochanan the Immerser (John the Baptist) was a rightful heir to the priesthood of Israel. Therefore, Yochanan the Immerser was given authority by God to transfer the priesthood of Aaron onto the King Messiah. Only in this way could the roles of King of Judah (in the line of David) and High Priest be combined in One Man. The act of conferring was symbolically performed by Yochanan the Immerser at the tevilah (immersion/baptism) of Yeshua.
 
All High Priests of Israel throughout the generations must prepare themselves by washing in order to approach the Lord God to make atonement for the sins of Israel. Yeshua Who is sinless need not be immersed (baptised) for repentance, washing clean, or for any other sin related reason, thus when Yeshua said of His immersion (baptism) “Let it happen now, for in this way it is fitting for us to fulfil all righteousness.” (Matt 3:15), what He meant by “All righteousness” was for Yochanan the heir to the Aaronic High Priesthood to ritually wash Yeshua as Priest of priests, the heavenly Kohen HaGadol and make way for His sacrificial death and life giving resurrection and the means by which all who receive Him can be made righteous through His blood. This symbolic act of washing (baptism) revealed Yeshua as rightful and eternal Kohen HaGadol (High Priest) and Melekh HaY’hudiym (King of the Jews), Melekh Hamelekhiym (King of kings). Thus, Yeshua united the priesthood and kingship of Israel and showed Himself to be the King Messiah.
 
Therefore, the writer of the Book to the Hebrews is making a point of alluding to the God appointed high priest Aaron and his descendants, who received the honour of being appointed from God unlike the apostate high priests of the first century Annas and Caiaphas, who were proxies for religious political forces both Greco-Roman (Hellenistic) and Jewish.
 
5 So too Messiah did not glorify His soul (nafsho[H]) in becoming a high priest (archiereus[G], kohen gadol[H]), but He who said to Him, “You are My Son (su ei mou uhios[G]), Today (sēmeron[G]) I have fathered/begotten (gennaō[G]) You” [Ps. 2:7]; 6 just as He also says (lego[G]) in another place, “You are a priest (hiereus[G], Kohen[H])  forever (eis aion [G], leolam[H]) According (kata[G]) to the order, arrangement, fashion, style (taxis[G]) of Melkiy-tzedek[H] (My king of righteousness).” [Ps. 110:4 (109:4 LXX)]
 
5 So too Messiah did not glorify His soul in becoming a high priest, but the One Who glorified Him was He who said to Him, “You are My Son, Today I have fathered [begotten] You” [Ps. 2:7];
 
Yeshua did not name or appoint Himself High Priest (like those of the apostate priesthood of the first century C.E.), but was, like Aaron, appointed by God. However, unlike Aaron, Yeshua qualified as the transcendent High Priest (not Levitical) due to His being fathered directly by God. In short, Yeshua’s Deity as progeny of the Father and His being born as a human being within time and space mean He is able to make intercession for all humanity and to provide the eternal blood of God as atonement for sin in place of the temporary symbolic blood of animals, which could never effectively atone for sin.
 
6 just as He also says in another place, “You are a priest forever According to the order, arrangement, fashion, style of Melkiy-tzedek[H].” [Ps. 110:4 (109:4 LXX)]
 
The Priesthood of Yeshua precedes and proceeds the priesthoods of Levi and Melkiy Tzedek. Yeshua’s Priesthood is symbolised in the type of priesthood held by Melkiy Tzedek (a Gentile), meaning that Yeshua’s Priesthood is over all peoples: first, because Yeshua is God with us, and in Him all things exist and have their being, second, because He is a Jew and High Priest over the descendants of Jacob (Jews) and finally, because His priesthood is like that of Melkiy Tzedek, He is qualified to be High Priest over all other peoples (ethnicities).
 
NB: Some Jewish commentators agree with the writer of the Book to the Hebrews and interpret Psalms 110:4 as alluding to the King Messiah (Moses Hadarsan apud Galatin. l. 10. c. 6. Abot R. Nathan, c. 34.)
 
We note that Melkiy Tzedek the historical figure, is a type, a temporal pattern, a shadow for the Messiah, but is not the Messiah.
 
The Scripture states:

"And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine: and he was the priest of the most high God." -Genesis 14:18

"The LORD has sworn, and will not turn, You are a priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek." -Psalm 110:4
 
“where Yeshua has entered as a forerunner for us, having become a high priest forever according to the order of Melchizedek.” -Hebrews 6:20
 
“This Melchizedek was king of Salem and priest of God Most High. He met Abraham returning from the defeat of the kings and blessed him, 2 and Abraham gave him a tenth of everything. First, the interpretation of the name Melchizedek means “king of righteousness”; then also, “king of Salem” means “king of peace.” 3 Without father or mother, without genealogy, without beginning of days or end of life, resembling the Son of God, he remains a priest continually.” -Hebrew 7:1-3

First, Melkiy Tzedek is an historical human king of Salem (the then capital of Jebus [a pagan name for Jerusalem associated to a false deity]). While we are not told his lineage we do know he was not a descended of Abram (Abraham). At that time in history numerous false deities were worshipped on the mount in Jerusalem (Jebus), none of whom were YHVH. Therefore, the Hebrew text specifies that Melkiy Tzedek did not know the God of Israel as YHVH, but by a generic title El Elyon (God most high, or the God above all gods). Has there ever been a point at which Yeshua has not known God as YHVH? The answer is absolutely not. Thus, Melkiy Tzedek the historical figure is not Yeshua.

Second, both the psalmist and the kohen (priest) who authored the Book to the Hebrews state clearly that Yeshua the King Messiah is a priest after THE ORDER of (Like) Melkiy Tzedek (the historical human priest who ministered to Abram), and not literally Melkiy Tzedek. If the Holy Spirit had intended us to understand Yeshua to literally be Melkiy Tzedek He would have authored the words "priest, who is the same as Melkiy Tzedek" or “Yeshua is Melkiy Tzedek…” or something likewise definitive. He did not.

Third, the kohen (priest) that authored the book to the Hebrews makes it clear that he is using the historical human king Melkiy Tzedek to teach a drash (comparative teaching), a figurative comparison. He writes “the interpretation of the name Melkiy Tzedek”, using the meaning of the name as a spiritual mystery expounding the character of the King Messiah, Who is “My King of Righteousness” by nature, but is not the literal historical person Melkiy Tzedek the king of Salem in Jebus. As an example, “the interpretation of” my daughter AzarYah’s name is “My Helper is YHVH” this points to YHVH as our Helper (the Holy Spirit), but it does not make my daughter the Holy Spirit.
 
Fourth, Messiah is never "pre incarnate" in the Hebrew Scriptures. He appears resurrected, transcendent and unbound by time and space as "the Angel of the presence" (to Abram, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, Joshua, Manoah etc.) but is never represented as a specific historical personage (this excludes Melkiy Tzedek the historical figure from being a transcendent incarnation of Yeshua).

Fifth, the historical figure Melkiy Tzedek was not a Jew. The King Messiah Who reigns as High Priest over all peoples must first be a Jew (of Judah, as the writer of Hebrews specifies [Heb. Chpts 6 & 7]) or He is no High Priest at all. This fact alone makes it impossible for Melkiy Tzedek the historical king of Salem (a non-Jew) to be the Messiah Yeshua “pre incarnate” or otherwise. The priesthood of Yeshua unifies the kingship and priesthood of Israel, subjecting the priesthood of Israel to the priesthood after the order of Melkiy Tzedek. An order established before Melkiy Tzedek was born by Yeshua in YHVH.
 
Sixth, when the text of the Book to the Hebrews says “Without father or mother, without genealogy” it does not mean that Melkiy Tzedek the historical person was literally without these things but that the Torah does not record his genealogy because he is not part of the genealogical record that points to the historical/religious progression of the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the Jewish people (Israel).
 
The wider context of Scripture, the context of the text of the Book to the Hebrews and the poetic language of the Psalmist, all explain clearly that Yeshua the King Messiah will be “like” but not the same person as Melkiy Tzedek the historical figure (Genesis 14).

The Scripture does not teach that Yeshua is Melkiy Tzedek, but that His priesthood is after the order of  Melkiy Tzedek because Yeshua's priesthood which is like that of Melkiy Tzedek is a priesthood over all ethnicities and like the priesthood of Melkiy Tzedek, which appears to continue perpetually, Yeshua’s priesthood is everlasting.

As I have stated previously, to say that the historical figure Melkiy Tzedek of the Tanakh (OT) and Yeshua the King Messiah are one in the same is blasphemous (idolatry) and those that teach it do so at their peril.
 
7 Who in the days (hēmera[G], biymeiy[H]) of His flesh (sarx[G], bivsaro[H]), offered up (prospherō[G]) both prayers (deēsis[G], tefilot[H]) and supplications/an olive branch (hiketēria[G]) with powerful (ischuros[G]) outcry (kraugē[G]) and tears (dakru[G]) before the face of (lifneiy[H]) He Who is able (dunamai[G]) to save (sōzō[G]) Him (autos[G]) out of (ex[G]) death (thanatos[G], mavet[H]), and He was heard (eisakouō[G]) because (apo[G]) He feared, held God in awe (eulabeia[G]). 8 Although (kaiper[G]) He was a Son (uihos[G], vein[H]), He learned, understood (manthanō[G], lumad[H]) obedience (hupakoē[G]) by the things which He suffered (paschō[G]).
 
7 Who in the days of His flesh, offered up both prayers and supplications/an olive branch with powerful outcry and tears before the face of He Who is able to save Him out of death, and He was heard because He feared, held God in awe.
 
Yeshua is the nearest subject as High Priest “after the order of” Melkiy Tzedek.
 
Yeshua during the days of His fragile flesh, living in a sin affected creation, prayed and pleaded with God through tears for the redemption of human beings, knowing that God was able to deliver Him from death and make salvation available to all who would believe (Luke 22:39-44).
 
The Greek hiketēria refers to the use of a wool covered olive branch as a symbol of suing for peace. Yeshua sues for peace on our behalf.
 
8 Although He was a Son, He learned, understood obedience by the things which He suffered.
 
Although Yeshua, being the Son of God and the manifest person of God with us, could have invoked His right as Son in order to avoid suffering, He nonetheless humbled Himself in living as a frail human being and ultimately unto death on a Roman cross. He willingly learned obedience to the Father through His earthly ministry (Philippians 2:3-11). Therefore, He became an example to all who would receive Him and be reconciled to God through Him, that we might live as He does.
 
9 Also having been perfected, consecrated, fulfilled (teleioō[G], shalem[H]) He became the Author, cause, source (aitios[G]) of eternal [worlds of] (aiōnios[G], olamiym[H]) salvation (sōtēria[G], teshuat[H]) for all those who obey (hupakouō[G]) Him, 10 being called (prosagoreuō[G]) among, under, by (hupo[G]) the God (ho Theos[G], Elohiym[H]) as High Priest (archiereus[G], kohen gadol[H]) according to, upon the words of (al-divratiy[H]) the order, arrangement, fashion, style (taxis[G]) of Melkiy-tzedek[H] (My king of righteousness). [Ps. 110:4 (109:4 LXX)]11 Concerning Him [Yeshua] we have (yesh lanu[H]) much to say (ladabeir[H]), and  difficult, heavy (dusermēneutos[G], kaveid[H]) to explain (lego[G]), since you have become dull, lazy, slow, poor listeners, deaf eared (akoē[G], arley-ozen[H]).
 
9 Also having been perfected, consecrated, fulfilled He became the Author, cause, source of eternal [worlds of] salvation for all those who obey Him,
 
Eternal salvation is unique to Yeshua’s work. Temporal salvation may be seen in the outworking of the Levitical priesthood, but eternal salvation can only be purchased by God Himself in His Son Yeshua the King Messiah. Through His obedience Yeshua fully realised His position as Author [source] of salvation for all who would receive Him in obedience. In short, His obedience to God brings salvation to those who will be obedient to Him. Only in humbling Himself as a human being could Yeshua fully fill this role.
 
10 being called among, under, by the God as High Priest according to, upon the words of the order, arrangement, fashion, style of Melkiy-tzedek[H]. [Ps. 110:4 (109:4 LXX)]
 
Notice that Yeshua is called from within, among, under God. He is Imanu (with us) El (God). Once again, He is called according to the type, order of Melkiy Tzedek. His priesthood, like that of the earth born priest Melkiy Tzedek, is to all who share in the faith of Abraham, for the Jew perpetually first and also for the nations.
 
11 Concerning Him [Yeshua] we have much to say, and  difficult, heavy to explain, since you have become dull, lazy, slow, poor listeners, deaf eared.
 
Yeshua is the nearest subject. Melkiy Tzedek is the qualifying type for Yeshua, not the subject, Who is Yeshua Himself. Therefore, the first century Jewish audience is not being challenged concerning its knowledge of Melkiy Tzedek (an individual they already had extensive knowledge of), but concerning their laziness regarding their understanding of Yeshua’s role and identity.
 
12 For though by this time you ought to be teachers, have  a master’s degree, possess a doctorate (didaskalos[G], moriym[H]), you nonetheless need to again have someone to teach (didaskō[G]) you to return to (lashuv[H])the first, beginning, elementary, primary (archē[G]) principles, rudiments, elements, cornerstones (stoicheion[G], avneiy pinah[H]) of the oracles, utterances, words, essences, instructions (logion[G], betorat[H]) of the God (ho Theos[G], Elohiym[H]), and you have come to need milk, baby food (gala[G], lechalav[H]) and not strong food, oiled bread [fat bread] (stereos trophe[G], lelechem shamein[H]).
 
12 For though by this time you ought to be teachers, have a master’s degree, possess a doctorate, you nonetheless need to again have someone teach you to return to the first, beginning, elementary, primary principles, rudiments, elements, cornerstones of the oracles, utterances, words, essences, instructions of the God, and you have come to need milk, baby food and not strong food, oiled bread [fat bread].
 
The writer’s incredulity is palpable. He is rebuking the first century Jewish believers for their lack of maturity regarding their faith in God through Yeshua. Given generations of Torah observance and participation in the Temple cult which was passed on to them, and having now been believers in Yeshua the promised King Messiah for many years (this was written approx. 30 years after Yeshua’s ascension, about 60-65 C.E.), they are still only able to understand the basic concepts of faith through Yeshua, and this because they have been slow to hear, deaf, dull etc.
 
The Hebrew translation reads “nonetheless (you) need to again have someone teach you to return to the first, beginning, elementary cornerstones betorat in the instructions (plural of Torah)  of the God, and you have come to need milk, baby food and not lelechem shamein oiled bread/fat bread.”
 
We note that the teachings of Yeshua and His talmidiym (disciples) are likened to Torah in that they are birthed in the fundamental torat (instructions) of God. The Hebrew lelechem shamein denotes bread of the fatness of the land, full of health, prosperity, and strength. This is the bread they are missing out on because they have not conditioned their spiritual appetite to feed on anything more than the milk of a nursing child. The writer likens them to preteens who still suck at their mother’s breast. Milk does not sustain a harvester for the day’s work, the strength needed for the harvest is found in the complex carbohydrates of oiled bread/fat bread. The Jewish believers of the first century have need of solid spiritual bread in order to work in the harvest of God’s Kingdom.
 
13 For everyone individually and collectively (pas[G]) who partakes (metechō[G]) of milk (chalav[H]) is unskilful, inexperienced, ignorant, has no knowledge (apeiros[G], eiyn lo deiah[H]) in the word, essence (logos[G], bedivreiy[H]) of righteousness (dikaiosunē[G], tzedek[H]), for that one is an infant (nēpios[G]). [cf. Isa. 7:15; re. Messiah to the contrary: His spiritual maturity exceeded His physical growth] 14 But strong food, oiled bread [fat bread] (stereos trophe[G], lelechem shamein[H]) is for the mature, who by reason (dia[G]) of practice (hexis[G]) have their senses, perception (aisthētērion[G]) vigorously trained, exercised (gumnazō[G]), their hearts, core being, inner person examined (biv’chiynat lebotam[H]) to distinguish, discern (diakrisis[G], lehavdiyl[H]) between good (kalos[G], tov[H]) and evil (kakos[G], ra[H]).
 
13 For everyone individually and collectively who partakes of milk is unskilful, inexperienced, ignorant, has no knowledge in the word, essence of righteousness, for that one is an infant. [cf. Isa. 7:15; re. Messiah to the contrary: His spiritual maturity exceeded His physical growth] 
 
Nursing infants are described in Scripture by an idiom referring to their inability to distinguish between right and wrong (Jonah 4:11). Note that being able to distinguish between right and wrong is not the same as being aware of right and wrong. Right and wrong are always present in the sin affected world. Distinguishing between them is a mark of maturity.
 
Faith in Yeshua and the outworking of it goes beyond the acceptance of Him and His atoning sacrifice. Dwelling on the basic concept of salvation through blood atonement without listening to the teaching that leads to maturity, leaves a believer without knowledge of the greater implications of the outworking of righteousness.
 
14 But strong food, oiled bread [fat bread] is for the mature, who by reason have their senses, perception vigorously trained, exercised, their hearts, core being, inner person, examined to distinguish, discern between good and evil.
 
The strengthening bread of the mature is eaten by those who actively listen to and implement the Word of God through Yeshua. This involves vigorous training, gymnao[G] lit. “naked exercise”, the exercising of right action, opening the inner person to the transforming work of God’s Spirit, so that, by the work of Yeshua in us we might discern between good and evil. We are naked before God in Yeshua, devoid of so called “secret sin” because nothing is hidden from Him. All human beings have the knowledge of good and evil based on the sin of Adam and eve, and our personal individual and corporate decision to perpetuate that sin. However, only the intentional disciple of Yeshua has, by the righteousness of Yeshua within him, the true ability to discern between good and evil.
 
The danger to the believer who continues on milk alone, is that he may fail to distinguish between good and evil due to his lack of maturity and may therefore, turn aside to ungodly practice which leads to death.
 
An infant is born for the purpose of maturing. Those who grow in size but not in maturity will find themselves swayed by every ill wind in the adult world. A mother will not put up with the foolishness of an adult child who continues to demand milk from her breasts. This image goes beyond childishness to express the perversion of infantile faith.
 
Copyright 2021 Yaakov Brown

​Introduction:
 
Chapter 4 continues the exposition of Psalm 95:7-11, and makes a drash (comparative teaching) using the term “rest” as a simile for “Shabbat”, with the purpose of revealing the present, ongoing, and coming eternal rest (Shabbat) of God, which has been established from the beginning of creation. That rest being present in the Kingdom of God manifest within time and space unto the goal and the convergence of the Olam Haba [world to come] (what many Christians often refer to as Heaven: a misnomer given Rev. 21:1-3).
 
The Shabbat in question is that Shabbat which is both established in the seventh day of the creation week and proceeds the cosmic week that follows the week of creation. The weekly Shabbat observed by the people of Israel (descendants of Jacob) is a shadow of the eternal Shabbat, in the same way that the earthly Temple is a shadow of heavenly things (Heb. 8:4-5).
 
Shabbat, from the Hebrew root sheva (7, blessing, rest, sit), and related to the Hebrew word shevet (sit, dwell, settle) reflects the fullness of the attributes of God’s nature, His rest and blessing (Isaiah 6:1-5). Therefore, In God through Messiah the eternal Shabbat (rest) has existed from the foundation of the world and thus, from our view within time and space, the temporal rest of the promised land which Joshua lead Israel into (Joshua 1:13) is preceded and superseded by the eternal rest of God through Yeshua. This is consistent with the theme of Messiah’s superiority, His all-existing nature. Yeshua is Lord of the Shabbat (not just the temporal weekly Shabbat but also of the transcendent Shabbat reflected in it.
 
This teaching does not do away with the observance of the weekly Shabbat by the Jewish believer (ethnic descendant of Jacob), rather it illuminates the weekly Shabbat as a reminder of the rest experienced by creation in the beginning, and acts as a foretaste of the eternal Shabbat which already exists and will swallow up the present sin affected creation with fire (judgement) and renewal (2 Peter 3:10).
 
It’s important at this point to remind the reader that the audience of this work are late first century Jewish followers of Yeshua the King Messiah, and that their understanding sees all that is being taught in relationship to God’s continued redemptive purposes and His immutable promises to Israel, the blood descendants of Jacob. They are faced with properly understanding the nature of the passing earthly shadows of the heavens (the role of Torah, priesthood, sacrificial system, priestly practice, and Shabbat). Note that the earthly shadows are passing, neither obligatory nor permanent.
 
As is the case with all Scripture (scrolls of the original texts), there are no chapter breaks or verse markers (or punctuation for that matter) in the scroll of the Book to the Hebrews. It’s important to see the text of this chapter as a continuation of the previous chapter, the last verses of chapter 3 being:
 
18 And to whom did He swear that they would not enter His rest, but to those who were disobedient, apathetic? 19 And we see that they were not able to enter because of unbelief.
 
Which rest did the disobedient among the generation leaving Egypt not enter?
 
““Remember the command that Moses the servant of the Lord gave you after he said, ‘The Lord your God will give you rest by giving you this land.’” -Joshua 1:13 NIV
 
The rest being used as an example is the rest obtained by God’s gift of the promised land Eretz Yisrael.
 
If we fail to keep this in mind we will fail to understand the remainder of the teaching.
 
BOOK TO THE HEBREWS Chapter 4 (Author’s translation)
 
1 Fear therefore, lest while a promise remains [is to come] of entering into His rest, any one of you [souls] may seem [be thought to have] come short, fallen behind. 
2 For, indeed we have had good news preached to us, just as they also did; but the word, essence they heard did not benefit them, because they were not united, mixed, tempered together with those who in faith  heard, listened, received, understood.
3 For we who have believed, trusted, committed, enter His rest, just as He has said, “As I swore in My anger, flaring nostril, ‘They certainly shall not enter My rest.’” [Psalm 95:10-11 LXX] although His works were finished from the foundation of the world, earth and heavens. 
4 For He has said somewhere about the seventh day: “And God rested, sat down on the seventh day from all His works” [Gen. 2:2]; 
5 and again in this place, “‘They certainly shall not enter My rest.’” [Psalms 95:11] 
6 Because therefore, it remains for some to enter it, and those who before had good news preached to them failed to enter because of disobedience, apathy,
7 He again determined a certain day, “Today,” saying through David after so long a time just as has been said before, “Today if you hear His voice, Do not harden your hearts.” [Psalms 95:7-8]
8 For if Yehoshua (son of Nun) had given them rest, he would not have spoken of another day after that.
9 Consequently, there remains a Shabbat (rest, sitting, blessing) for the people of God. 
10 For the one who has entered His rest has himself also rested, restrained from his works, as the God did from His. 
11 Therefore let’s be diligently labouring to enter that rest, so that no one will fall according to the same example, pattern of disobedience, apathy.
12 For living and effective, is the word, essence of God and sharper above any two-edged short sword, even piercing so as to divide soul life and spirit, of both joints and marrow, and able to discern the thoughts and intentions of the heart (inner being, core).
13 Neither is there any creature, building, ordinance, hidden from His sight, presence, face, but all things individually and collectively are naked and opened before the eyes of Him to Whom we must give an account.
14 Therefore, since we have a great high priest Who has passed through the heavens, Yeshua the Son of the God, let’s hold fast to our profession. 
15 For we do not have a high priest Who is unable to sympathize, have compassion with our weaknesses, but One who has been tempted, tried, examined, proved in all things just as we are, yet without sin [missing the mark set by God’s holiness]. 
16 Therefore let us come freely with boldness, confidently to the throne of grace, unmerited favour, practical love, so that we may receive mercy and find grace for help at the time of our need.
 
HEBREWS 4 (line upon line)
 
1 Fear (phobeō[G]) therefore (oun[G]), lest while a promise (epaggelia[G], ha’havtacha[H]) remains [is to come] (lavo[H]) of entering (eiserchomai[G]) into (eis[G]) His (autos[G]) rest (katapausis[G], menuchato[H]), any one of you [souls](lenafsheinu[H]) may seem [be thought] (dokeō[G]) to have come short, fallen behind (hustereō[G]). 2 For (kai[G]), indeed (gar[G]) we have had good news preached (euaggelizō[G], vesra tovah[H]) to us, just as they also did; but the word, essence (logos[G], hadavar[H]) they heard (sham’u hem[H]) did not benefit (ōpheleō[G]) them, because they were not united, mixed, tempered together (sugkerannumi[G]) with those who in faith (pistis[G], be’emunat[H]) heard, listened, received, understood (akouō[G]). 
 
1 Fear therefore, lest while a promise remains [is to come] of entering into His rest, any one of you [souls] may seem [be thought to] have come short, fallen behind. 
 
“Fear therefore” The Jewish believers of the first century are admonished to have holy fear of God because the generation of their ancestors who disobeyed God in the desert “were not able to enter because of unbelief.” In short, “fear God and avoid unbelief”.
 
“lest while a promise remains of entering into His rest, any one of you [souls] may seem to have come short, fallen behind.” While the promise of entering His (God’s) rest remains, continues to be accessible to the Jewish believers (meaning unto the goal of time and space), we must be careful not to fall short of it through unbelief.
 
While the original temporal rest of the promised land offered by God through Joshua (Joshua 1:13) had been entered into by some (Joshua, Caleb and their families along with the subsequent generation born of the disobedient), even some of those who received this Book to the Hebrews (Jewish believers still living in the land of Israel prior to 70 C.E), it was nonetheless always to be a temporal shadow of the eternal land promised to Israel (part of the world to come), entry to which continues to be offered to the descendants of Jacob through the final Joshua, Yeshua the King Messiah.
 
The writer of the Book to the Hebrews, understanding that in the context of Psalms 95, the rest being entered into was the promised land (eretz Yisrael) [ref. Joshua 1:13], now makes a comparative drash alluding to the eternal rest of God as having been established from the beginning of creation (Gen.2:2). He makes clear that the eternal rest of God was always offered to Israel through Yeshua the King Messiah, and that the temporal rest offered in the land has always been a shadow of the eternal rest that exists outside of time and space. Not that Israel will fail to possess the land promised to her by God as an everlasting possession (Gen. 15), but that she will possess that land renewed, recreated, everlasting, in the Olam Haba (world to come).
 
“Remember the command that Moses the servant of the Lord gave you after he said, ‘The Lord your God will give you rest by giving you this land.’” -Joshua 1:13 NIV
 
Therefore, the temporary, earthly rest gained under the leadership of Joshua at God’s instruction was pointing to the transcendent and eternal, metaphysical, spiritual, rest of God established in creation and fully filled in the renewed creation.
 
2 For, indeed we have had good news preached to us, just as they also did; but the word, essence they heard did not benefit them, because they were not united, mixed, tempered together with those who in faith  heard, listened, received, understood.
 
“For, indeed we have had good news preached to us, just as they also did;” The good news/Gospel (euaggelizō[G], vesra tovah[H]) the generation escaping Egypt had received was in historical context, the news of the promised rest of God in the promised land of Israel (Joshua 1:13). However, it was also the transcendent good news of Messiah, Who, resurrected and unbound by time and space has made salvation available to all, regardless of their position within the limitations of chronology. That Good News made evident in the delivering of the snake bitten through gazing upon the defeated snake held up on a bronse stake by Moses the drawn out one (Num. 21).
 
Therefore, “we have had good news preached to us, just as they also did;” makes the Good News/Gospel of Yeshua the King Messiah available to every generation. Anything else denies God’s justice and impugns His character, for in a certain place Messiah has said “No one comes to the Father (God) except through Me” (John 14:6). From the first man Adam until the last human to be born prior to the goal (end) of the present created order, all are offered an opportunity of redemption and eternal life by the just God of creation through the Last Adam (Yeshua) [1 Cor. 15:45].
 
“The word they heard did not benefit them because they were not united, together with those who in faith heard, listened” Not because they were entirely devoid of faith of any kind, but because they were not united in faith with those who truly listened to the voice of God (specifically Joshua & Caleb: Num. 13:30-14:10). In short, faith alone is not enough, faith grows in relationship and is proved in action (Yaakov [James] 2:14-25). The emphasis is on the need for each believer to be strengthened by the community of faith. This is pretext to the explicit allusion to the same idea recorded later in the Book to the Hebrews.
 
“And let us consider how we may spur one another on toward love and good deeds, 25 not giving up meeting together, as some are in the habit of doing, but encouraging one another—and all the more as you see the Day approaching.” -Hebrews 10:24-25 NIV
 
3 For we who have believed, trusted, committed (pisteuō[G], hama’amiyniym[H]) enter (eiserchomai[G]) His rest (katapausis[G], menuchato[H]), just as He has said, “As I swore (omnuō[G], nishbatiy[H]) in My anger, flaring nostril (orgē[G], veafiy[H]), ‘They certainly shall not enter (eiserchomai[G], im-yevoun[H]) My rest (katapausis ego[G], el-menuchatiy[H]).’” [Psalm 95:10-11 LXX] although His works (ergon[G]) were finished from the foundation (katabolē[G], behivaseid[H]) of the world, earth and heavens (kosmos[G], eretz veshamayim[H]). 4 For He has said (ereō[G]) somewhere about (peri[G]) the seventh day (hebdomos[G], al yom hashviyiy[H]): “And God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]) rested, sat down (katapauō[G], vayishbot[H]) on the seventh day (bayom hashviyiy[H]) from all (mekol[H]) His works (ergon[G], melachto[H])” [Gen. 2:2]; 
 
3 For we who have believed, trusted, committed, enter His rest, just as He has said, “As I swore in My anger, flaring nostril, ‘They certainly shall not enter My rest.’” [Psalm 95:10-11 LXX] although His works were finished from the foundation of the world, earth and heavens. 
 
Psalms 95, requoted here, was sung during the weekly Shabbat services in the Temple and remains part of the weekly Shabbat liturgy in the synagogue to this day. The writer’s Jewish audience understand the intrinsic connection between this Psalm and the weekly Shabbat.
 
In the same way that entering into the physical rest of the land of Canaan demanded faith in God’s promise, so too entry into the eternal rest through salvation in Messiah demands faith as an ongoing commitment to walking with Yeshua in God.
 
“we who have believed, trusted, committed, enter His rest…” Those of us who believe and are committed to Yeshua in God have begun and are continuing to “enter His rest”. The text is in the present continuous sense, meaning that it is an ongoing process.
 
It’s important to remember that belief (faith, trust) births action and action is the reciprocating child of belief. One who believes that action is incumbent upon him is in bondage to himself, but the one whose actions are born of his belief is free. Nothing free ever comes from obligation.
 
“His works were finished from the foundation of the world, earth and heavens.” The eternal Shabbat established in God has been present and offered to humanity from the foundation of creation. His rest is already a reality for those willing to receive it. “His rest” means that the rest in question belongs to and is in God. It is made available to humanity (always first for the Jew and also always for the Gentile ref. Rom. 1:16) through Yeshua the King Messiah. The rest God calls us to is not “our rest” but “His rest”.
 
The rest in question is present in the receipt of salvation, discipleship, future Messianic age and the Olam Haba (world to come) as a complex unity. It is all these and no single separated part of the sum.
 
Rav Kattina teaches that the six millennia of world history will be followed by a millennium of Shabbat, the Messianic age (Sanhedrin 97a). In Biblical Hebrew thought 1000 is symbolic of eternity or perpetuity. Therefore, Jewish tradition affirms the eternal nature of the Shabbat rest of the Olam Haba (world to come).
 
4 For He has said somewhere about the seventh day: “And God rested, sat down on the seventh day from all His works” [Gen. 2:2]; 
 
Once again the writer does not quote chapter and verse. Rather he alludes to a text that is well known and presumes the audience will be familiar with it. The Hebrew text of Genesis 2:2 literally says that God “sat down on the seventh day”. In very simple and profound terms, to receive the good news of Yeshua is to sit in immutable rest and security with God (the YHVH Merciful Elohiym Judge).
 
5 and again in this place (uvamakom hazeh[H]), “‘They certainly shall not enter (eiserchomai[G], im-yevoun[H]) My rest (katapausis ego[G], el-menuchatiy[H]).’” [Psalms 95:11] 6 Because (epei[G]) therefore (oun[G]), it remains (apoleipō[G]) for some to enter (eiserchomai[G]) it, and those who before (proteron[G]) had good news preached (euaggelizō[G], vesra tovah[H]) to them failed to enter (eiserchomai[G]) because of disobedience, apathy, (apeitheia[G]) 
 
5 and again in this place, “‘They certainly shall not enter My rest.’” [Psalms 95:11] 6 Because therefore, it remains for some to enter it, and those who before had good news preached to them failed to enter because of disobedience, apathy,
 
“Those who before” Are those of the generation that came out of Egypt. Therefore, the generation that escaped Egypt also were given the euaggelizo Good News (as previously explained) but with the exception of Joshua and Caleb and their families, that generation rejected the Good News through disobedience and apathy. The generation escaping Egypt was given the Torah at Sinai and with it the weekly Shabbat sign of distinction commanded to ethnic Israelites (Exodus 31:16-17). Following this, while numerous acts of disobedience contributed, nonetheless one single act of disobedience prevented the disbelieving of that generation from entering the rest of the promised land (Joshua 1:13). It was their refusal of the euaggelizo Good News/Gospel spoken by Joshua (& Caleb) concerning the promised land. Joshua being a type in both name and action for the future King Messiah Who would lead Israel into the eternal promised land (Olam Haba). Note that the disobedient who failed to enter the rest were weekly Shabbat keepers.
 
Once again, the writer of the Book to the Hebrews, understanding that in the context of Psalms 95, the rest being entered into was the promised land (Eretz Yisrael), now makes a comparative drash alluding to the eternal rest of God as having been established from the beginning of creation (Gen.2:2). He makes clear that the eternal rest of God was always offered to Israel through Yeshua the King Messiah, and that the rest offered in the land has always been a shadow of the eternal rest that exists outside of time and space, albeit in the eternal land (Israel [chosen, ethnic] will have the promised land Ertez Yisrael in the world to come, but it will be renewed/recreated undefiled).
 
“Remember the command that Moses the servant of the Lord gave you after he said, ‘The Lord your God will give you rest by giving you this land.’” -Joshua 1:13 NIV
 
Therefore, the temporary, earthly rest gained under the leadership of Joshua son of Nun, at God’s instruction, was pointing to the transcendent and eternal, metaphysical, spiritual rest of God established in creation. This is evidenced by the continuing invitation of Psalms 95:7-8.
 
7 He again (palin[G]) determined (horizo[G]) a certain (tis[G]) day (hemera[G]), “Today,” (sēmeron[G], hayom[H]) saying (lego[G]) through David[H] (Beloved) after (meta[G]) so long (tosoutos[G]) a time (chronos[G]) just as has been said before, “Today (sēmeron[G], hayom[H]) if (ean[G], im[H]) you hear (akouō[G], tishmau[H]) His voice (phone[G], bekolo[H]), Do not (me[G]) harden (sklērunō[G]) your hearts.” [Psalms 95:7-8] 8 For if Yeshua/Yehoshua[H] (Iesous[G] Joshua: YHVH Saves) had given them rest (katapauō[G]), he would not have spoken of another (allos[G]) day (hemera[G]) after that. 
 
7 He again determined a certain day, “Today,” saying through David after so long a time just as has been said before, “Today if you hear His voice, Do not harden your hearts.” [Psalms 95:7-8]
 
“Today” Meaning both David’s time and the time of the writing of the Book to the Hebrews.
 
King David lived centuries after Joshua. Therefore, the settlement of Canaan by Joshua, Caleb and the generation following those who were disobedient, did not fully fill the promise of rest. That promise being one of eternal rest in the recreated promised land within the Olam Haba (world to come).
 
The everlasting nature of the Shabbat rest of God is further illuminated by Yeshua the King Messiah:
 
“And as for the resurrection of the dead, have you not read what was said to you by God: ‘I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob’? He is not God of the dead, but of the living.” -Matthew 22:31-32 ESV
 
“if you hear His voice” Does not mean “if the message is spoken to you” but “if, once the message has been spoken to you, you choose to hear, listen, receive, understand…”
 
“Do not harden your hearts” These words are spoken to soft hearts as a warning against hardening.
 
“Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi went to the Messiah. He said to the Messiah: Greetings to you, my rabbi and my teacher. The Messiah said to him: Greetings to you, bar Leva’i. Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said to him: When will the Master come? The Messiah said to him: Today. Sometime later, Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi came to Elijah. Elijah said to him: What did the Messiah say to you? He said to Elijah that the Messiah said: Greetings [shalom] to you, bar Leva’i. Elijah said to him: He thereby guaranteed that you and your father will enter the World-to-Come, as he greeted you with shalom. Rabbi Yehoshua ben Levi said to Elijah: The Messiah lied to me, as he said to me: I am coming today, and he did not come. Elijah said to him that this is what he said to you: He said that he will come “today, if you will listen to his voice” (Psalms 95:7).” -Talmud Bavliy Sanhedrin 98a 17
 
8 For if Yehoshua (son of Nun) had given them rest, he would not have spoken of another day after that. 
 
The Greek Iesous meaning Yeshua is used here to refer to Joshua son of Nun and not to Yeshua the Messiah. Yehoshua or its shortened form Yeshua was a common name among Jews of every period, being that Joshua is a hero of Biblical Jewish faith whose name means YHVH is salvation. Because the writer of Hebrews was writing to first century Jewish believers he need not clarify which Yeshua he is speaking of. Those who received this work understood the context of the Scripture which the writer was expounding. Where the King Messiah is meant a qualifying title or description is included, as is the case later in this chapter, where He is called Yeshua the Son of God (v.14).
 
If those of the generation of Joshua had entered the rest being spoken of, David would not have had to speak of another day called “today”.
 
9 Consequently, there remains (apoleipō[G]) a Shabbat[H] [rest, sitting, blessing] (sabbatismos[G]) for the people (laos[G], le’am[H]) of God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]). 10 For the one who has entered (eiserchomai[G]) His rest (katapausis[G], menuchato[H]) has himself also rested, restrained (katapauō[G]) from his own (autos[G]) works (ergon[G]), as the God (ho Theos[G], Elohiym[H]) did from His. 11 Therefore let’s be diligently labouring (spoudazō[G]) to enter (eiserchomai[G]) that rest (katapausis[G]), so that no one will fall (piptō[G]) according to the same example, pattern (hupodeigma[G]) of disobedience, apathy, (apeitheia[G]). 
 
9 Consequently, there remains a Shabbat (rest, sitting, blessing) for the people of God.
 
“there remains a Shabbat” First, this verse speaks of “a Shabbat” and not “the Shabbat (weekly)”. Shabbat can refer to the weekly Shabbat, or to any of the high days of the Biblical festivals. Thus, Israel has many Shabbatot (sabbaths). What’s more, Shabbat literally means “rest” (those foolish Messianics who claim the word “rest” is not present in the text of Heb. 4:9, clearly don’t understand the Hebrew language, Biblical or otherwise).
 
Had the writer intended to convey the weekly Shabbat as being the Shabbat that remains he would have used the definite article and called it “the Shabbat”. The Shabbat that remains cannot be the weekly Shabbat observed in the sin affected creation. That weekly Shabbat will not remain, because eternity is a perpetual Shabbat and not a temporary break in the sin affected weekly rhythm of the present order. Further still, the disobedient generation who did not enter the rest that remains, were weekly Shabbat keepers (as per Sinai and the giving of Torah). Therefore, to claim that the Shabbat being spoken of here is the weekly Shabbat is to diminish the promise and make it worthless.
 
The idea that the Shabbat rest of God that remains is everlasting is consistent with ancient Jewish writings. Qumran’s 4QShirShabba describes the heavenly host celebrating the transcendent heavenly Shabbat. Likewise Mishnah Tamid 7:4 describes the Messianic age as an eternal Shabbat. Neither of which are the weekly Shabbat, which is not more than a shadow of the heavenly Shabbat. Weekly Shabbat keeping is of benefit only if it is observed in freedom out of love and acknowledged as a “sign” between God and the ethnic descendants of Jacob.
 
If you keep the Shabbat out of obligation you have failed to obey the commandment. Obligation is hard work, there is no rest in obligation (Shemot [Exodus] 31:16-17, Galatians 5:1).
 
“for the people of God” In the context of the Book to the Hebrews “the people of God” are the Jewish people, in particular the Messiah following Jews of the first century C.E. (the recipients of this work). The Hebrew descriptor “People of God” alludes to the ethnic descendants of Jacob (Judges 40:2; 2 Samuel 14:13). The Greek “laos” used here in the Book to the Hebrews is used throughout the Septuagint LXX to refer to ethnic Israel, the descendants of Jacob (Exodus 33:13, 16; Deut. 7:6; Hosea 4:6, 8, 12). The most common Biblical application of the phrase “People of God” is to ethnic Israel, the descendants of Jacob.
 
While it’s true that elsewhere in the Brit Chadashah (NT) Gentile followers of Yeshua are grafted into the wider meaning of the descriptor “People of God” (Acts 15:14; 18:10; Romans 9:25; 11; 1 Peter 2:10), it is nonetheless not the case in the present passage.
 
This does not negate an application by extension to all Messiah followers, but it does establish context so as to avoid the zealous overreach of the law keeping rhetoric of certain Messianic Jews and far too many Messianic Gentiles (so called). Those who insist that these verses support the idea that all followers of God must keep the weekly Shabbat, have not read them in context, nor have they properly considered the wider Scriptural imperative regarding the weekly Shabbat.
 
Additionally, being grafted into the Commonwealth of Israel (Rom. 11; Eph. 2) does not make a Gentile person ethnically or spiritually Jewish any more than being a part of the Commonwealth of Great Britain makes an indigenous Cree person (Canadian native) a Briton (tribal, ethnic, of Britain). Those grafted into the Commonwealth of Israel feed from the faith root of the natural olive tree (ethnic Jews/Israelites) but do not fruit the same variety of fruit as the natural tree.
 
As a manager of a garden centre for a number of years (prior to becoming a Spiritual Leader) I noted that the multi-graft olive trees we sold fruited the fruit of their original (wild) plants where they had been grafted to the natural (base stock) plant. In short, a burgundy-brown coloured (Kalamata) olive from a wild tree grafted to the green olive (Castelvetrano) of the natural tree, nonetheless fruited burgundy-brown year after year, likewise a black olive (Bella di Cerignola) from another wild tree, and so on (we sold trees of up to four grafts of wild olives attached to the root stock of the base plant). After all, what is the point of a multi-graft olive tree that bears only the fruit of the natural tree?
 
With regard to the teaching of Romans 11/Ephesians 2, spiritually and ethnically speaking, being grafted in by faith through Yeshua the King Messiah to the root source (that which feeds the tree) does not mean a loss of ethnicity (culture, uniqueness, identity, flavour, colour), nor does it mean appropriation of the mother tree’s ethnicity (culture, uniqueness, identity, flavour, colour).
 
Learn this lesson well Gentile brothers and sisters: God did not make a mistake when He made you of a different ethnicity to that of Israel (Jewish people). Nor does He require you to become Jews. Freedom is in Messiah alone, all else is idolatrous nonsense. Be the Messiah essential you, expressing all that is godly within your own ethnic cultural identity in Yeshua.
 
The Shabbat in question (Heb. 4:9) has clearly not been entered into by the ancient generation of disobedient Israelites (escaping Egypt) who nonetheless had kept the weekly Shabbat since receiving the command at Sinai, and died subsequently after complaining against God. Therefore, the weekly Shabbat cannot possibly be the Shabbat being spoken of here.
 
We are again reminded that added to this is the fact that the audience of the Book to the Hebrews are first century Jewish believers who are already keeping the weekly Shabbat, but are nonetheless being admonished to work to enter Shabbat (v.10-11), why? If they’re already keeping the weekly Shabbat, why would they need to work at entering, unless the Shabbat being spoken of is not the weekly Shabbat. The weekly Shabbat (which the believing Jews were already keeping) is instead used as an example of the transcendent Shabbat of God accessed by those who receive His Son Yeshua in faith and action.
 
10 For the one who has entered His rest has himself also rested, restrained from his own works, as the God did from His. 
 
“the one who has entered His rest” Means that the believing Jew who has already entered God’s rest and will continue to. “The one who has entered” is the believing Jew. The rest being spoken of, called “His rest”, is the transcendent Shabbat of God (the nearest subject) established before the foundation of the world. Therefore, the one who has entered the transcendent Shabbat rest of God in Yeshua may well understand that rest, based on the observance of the weekly Shabbat, however, the weekly Shabbat is not the focus of this passage, rather the eternal Shabbat is.
 
We note that the one who has entered God’s rest has also, that is already through faith, chosen to “rest from his own works” as God rested from His work. In the case of God, His work was “very good” but in the case of the human being his work is sin affected and motivated by the evil inclination (Gen. 6:5). Therefore, the Jew who has entered the eternal Shabbat rest of God through Yeshua has learned to rest from the vanity of his own works. In short, there is no such thing as works based salvation (rest). Salvation unto rest is through Messiah in God alone and not by works, lest anyone should boast (commit idolatry)[Ephesians 2:8-9].
 
“For by grace you are saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: Not of works, lest any human should boast.” - Ephesians 2:8-9
 
It is to the great shame of many in the Messianic movement and those numerous Gentile Messianic zealots and pseudo Christian cults who do the same, that we have often taught law keeping lies based on the decontextualised teaching of Scripture portions like Hebrews 4:9-10.
 
These verses are not teaching that all believers must keep the weekly Shabbat, but that Jewish believers who keep the weekly Shabbat possess it as a reminder of their position within the eternal Shabbat rest of God. Meaning that the weekly Shabbat commanded to “the children of Israel”[Exodus 31:16-17] (not to all believers but to the ethnic descendants of Jacob) is a shadow cast by the heavenly Shabbat. This is consistent with the wider teaching of the Book to the Hebrews (Heb. 8:4-5).
 
The writer could not be more clear in pointing out that weekly Shabbat observance does not give the observer access to the eternal Shabbat of God. If it did, all those Shabbat keeping Israelites of the disobedient generation (who received and practiced the commandment for some time prior to refusing the message of God sent via Moses and through Joshua and Caleb) would have entered. What’s more, as the Scripture teaches, the weekly Shabbat is first and foremost a “sign” (ot, miraculous banner) between God and the descendants of Jacob alone (Exodus 31:16-17). An ethno-religious, very specific sign pointing to the eternal Shabbat purchased by the ethno-religious Jewish Messiah Yeshua. It is not a sign on the Gentiles (believers or not), nor is it incumbent upon them.
 
The Scriptures refute the false teaching that says the weekly Shabbat is incumbent on Gentile Christians. Rabbinical Judaism agrees and requires that Gentile God fearers need only keep the moral Law of Torah, sometimes referred to as the Noachide laws. Those moral laws predating the giving of the Torah and the ethno-religious sign of Shabbat. In fact, many of the moral laws which predate Torah are evidenced in other ancient moral codes such as the Hammurabi Codex 1755 B.C.E (which predates the Torah 1312 B.C.E by some 400 years) The early Jewish Church fathers also agree, and by the direction of the Holy Spirit gave the Gentile believers a concise form of the Noachide laws to guide them (Acts 15:1-35), laws which excluded the weekly Shabbat commandment.
 
Further still, in response to those who reject Scripture and claim the entire Torah to be incumbent on Gentiles, we ask “Where is it recorded that Adam, Noah, Abraham or even Jacob and his sons observed the weekly Shabbat?”
 
For further clarification please read the following exert from my previous article on the subject:
 
The Weekly Shabbat is Not Incumbent on Gentile Christians
 
“Remember Yom Shabbat, to keep it holy. You are to work six days, and do all your work, but the seventh day is a Shabbat to ADONAI your God. In it you shall not do any work—not you, nor your son, your daughter, your male servant, your female servant, your cattle, nor the outsider that is within your gates.” Exodus 20:8-10 (TLV)
 
Note that this commandment, given specifically to Israel (ethnic, religious, empirical) is to be observed by all Jews but only by foreigners (Gentiles) who live within the Jewish community: specifically among the people of Israel on their way to and within the land of Israel. This does not apply to today’s Christians who worship the God of Israel but live outside of Israel and further still, outside of the Jewish communities within the diaspora. The commandment to keep the weekly Shabbat is specifically a sign on the ethnic, religious chosen people of Israel (Jews):
 
“So Bnei-Yisrael is to keep the Shabbat, to observe the Shabbat throughout their generations as a perpetual covenant. It is a sign between Me and Bnei-Yisrael forever, for in six days ADONAI made heaven and earth, and on the seventh day He ceased from work and rested.’” -Exodus 31:16-17 (TLV)
 
We note that the weekly Shabbat is a sign between God and the ethnic, religious people of Israel (Jews). It is not a sign upon the nations.
 
When Yeshua said:
 
“the Shabbat was made for man and not man for the Shabbat” (Mark 2:23-28)
 
The only “men” present were Jews. Further, He used an example from the Tanakh in which only Jews participated. If we interpret His words to apply to all human beings, we are ignoring the historical and Scriptural context of what He said and impugning His character by suggesting that He contradicted the Torah (Exodus 31:16-17).
 
To the contrary, He is making a drash (comparative teaching) on a commandment given specifically to Israel (ethnic, religious , empirical) and not to the nations. Thus, when He says “man” He means “man” within the context of Israel (Jews) and not humanity in general.
 
If we go further and interpret His words figuratively to apply the Shabbat to all nations, we must by reason of logical progression be speaking of the eternal Shabbat at the end of the age, that is the Olam Haba (world to come) and not to the temporal weekly Shabbat commanded specifically to the Jews. All figurative interpretation must submit to the plain meaning of the text.
 
In the context of Yeshua’s words the command to keep Shabbat is not made incumbent on Gentile Christians, (who did not yet exist at the time Yeshua spoke), rather He was explaining to the Pharisees that the sign of the Shabbat upon Israel’s “men” was one of rest and restoration through the work of God and was not a form of rest purchased by either the restraint or the actions of Jewish “men” (and women).
 
All this is done to keep the Shabbat as a sign on the ethnic, religious Jewish people until the end of the age, when:
 
“‘it will come to pass,
that from one New Moon to another,
and from one Shabbat to another,
all flesh will come to bow down before Me,’
says ADONAI.” -Isaiah 66:23 (TLV)
 
The prophet Isaiah is clearly prophesying a time yet future (it will come), and is not, as some suggest, inferring that all nations should keep the weekly Shabbat in the present age.
 
This is also seen in Zechariah 14:16 where, at the end of the age (not now), the survivors of the defeated nations will repent and go up to Jerusalem to join with ethnic, religious Israel in celebration of the festival (signs) placed on the Jews. Neither passage denotes a requirement for weekly Shabbat observance by Gentile Christians in the present.
 
When Yeshua says “The Son of Man is Lord of the Shabbat” He is alluding to the Messianic title given to the Messiah in the prophecy of Daniel (Dan. 7:13-14) in order that He might be recognised as the Messiah by His disciples and any among the Pharisees who might understand and repent. While it is true that He is the Messiah over all men, we do not glean this understanding from the context of Mark 2:23-28.
 
I remind the reader that the weekly Shabbat is a sign between God and the ethnic, religious people of Israel (Jews). It is not a sign upon the nations.
 
“So Bnei-Yisrael is to keep the Shabbat, to observe the Shabbat throughout their generations as a perpetual covenant. It is a sign between Me and Bnei-Yisrael forever, for in six days ADONAI made heaven and earth, and on the seventh day He ceased from work and rested.’” -Exodus 31:16-17 (TLV)
 
Those who teach that Gentile Christians must keep the weekly Shabbat are in fact teaching Gentile Christians to usurp one of the signs that sets ethnic, religious Israel apart from the nations. Ironically, in doing so, these “Seventh Day Adventists”, “Hebrew roots Christians”, so called “Messianic Gentiles” and sadly far too many Messianic Jews, are literally teaching the practice of “Replacement Theology” (Successionism, Supersessionism, Continuationism etc.), which many of them claim to detest. Thus, they have become the worst kind of hypocrites.
 
I stand in opposition to those movements who seek to place Gentile Christians under bondage to commandments that were never incumbent upon them.
 
This is not to say that Gentile Christians can’t choose to keep the weekly Shabbat as free members of the body of Messiah Yeshua, rather it is to say that the weekly Shabbat is not incumbent upon Gentile Christians.
 
As a Jew and a follower of Yeshua set free for freedom, I don’t keep the weekly Shabbat out of a sense of obligation, but because I have come to understand that in Yeshua every day is Shabbat.
 
11 Therefore let’s be diligently labouring to enter that rest, so that no one will fall according to the same example, pattern of disobedience, apathy.
 
Once again those Jews who receive Yeshua are admonished to walk diligently in Him. Within time and space we are entering His rest so as not to remain in apathetic disobedience.
 
As explained by the text itself and its context, “that rest” is the eternal Shabbat of God established in creation and not the weekly Shabbat.
 
The Shabbat rest spoken of is God’s, as is the labour of entering. So what is the “work/labour of God”?
 
“Yeshua answered, ‘The work of God is this: to believe, trust, be committed in the One He has sent.” - John 6:29
 
We recall that the writer of the Book to the Hebrews has called Yeshua Ha Shaliach (The Sent One) the Apostle (Heb. 3:1).
 
Discipleship begins and continues in Yeshua. It is true that in Yeshua we have been saved. It is further important to realise that we are being saved. A date on a calendar is not proof of redemption, but the fruit of righteousness is evidence of it.
 
“For by one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy.” -Hebrews 10:14 NIV
 
12 For living (zaō[G], chay[H]) and effective (energēs[G]), is the word, essence (ho logos[G], ha’davar[H]) of God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]) and sharper (tomōteros[G]) above (huper[G]) any two-edged (distomos[G]) short sword (machaira[G]), even piercing (diikneomai[G]) so as to divide (merismos[G]) soul life (psuchē[G], nefesh[H])) and spirit (pneuma[G], ruach[H]), of both joints (harmos[G]) and marrow (muelos[G]), and able to discern (kritikos[G]) the thoughts (enthumēsis[G]) and intentions (ennoia[G]) of the heart [inner being, core] (kardia[G], leiv[H]). 
 
12 For living and effective, is the word, essence of God and sharper above any two-edged short sword, even piercing so as to divide soul life and spirit, of both joints and marrow, and able to discern the thoughts and intentions of the heart (inner being, core). 
 
“living and effective, is the word, essence of God and sharper above any two-edged short sword, even piercing so as to divide soul life and spirit, of both joints and marrow,” The couplets of Jewish poetry are present here in order to firmly establish the action of God’s living word essence in the person of Messiah. Soul to joint, spirit to marrow, seemingly indiscernible elements that show God’s intimate work through His living word (davar[H]).
 
The Greek “logos” equivalent to the Hebrew “davar” conveys more than written word (ketvi[H]). The Word (John 1) is present and active participating in the redemption of creation, dividing soul and spirit, joint and marrow, getting to the heart (inner being, core) of the human condition and bringing salvation and rest.
 
“The heart (inner being, core) is deceitful above all things, And desperately wicked; Who can know it?” -Jeremiah 17:9
 
“short sword” The Greek macharia describes an extremely sharp short sword or long dagger (Heb. 11:34, 37) often used by ancient Greeks and Romans as a stabbing weapon in close combat. An intimate weapon used up close. The same word is used to describe the “sword of the Spirit” as the word of God (Eph. 6:17). A surgical precision is inferred.
 
“able to discern the thoughts and intentions of the heart.” A non-Jewish writer, in keeping with the Greco-Roman worldview, might have written “discern the thoughts of the mind and intentions of the heart”. But the Jewish writer shows that he understands the heart in terms of Jewish consciousness, as the convergent centre of being (core). He does not convey God as dividing heart and mind but as the One Who discerns the thoughts and intentions of the inner person (heart, core).
 
13 Neither is there any creature, building, ordinance (ktisis[G]), hidden (aphanēs[G]) from His sight, presence, face (enōpion[G]), but all things (hakol[H]) individually and collectively (pas[G]) are naked (gumnos[G]) and opened (trachēlizō[G]) before the eyes of Him to Whom we must give an account (hemin logos[G]) [alt. diyn lepeneyv[H] to be judged before His face]. 14 Therefore, since we have a great (megas[G]) high priest (archiereus[G], kohen gadol[H]) Who has passed (dierchomai[G]) through the heavens (Ouranos[G], hashamayim[H]), Yeshua[H] (Iesous[G]) the Son (ho uihos[G], ha ben[H]) of the God (ho Theos[G], ha Elohiym[H]), let’s hold fast (krateō[G]) to our profession (homologia[G]). 
 
13 Neither is there any creature, building, ordinance, hidden from His sight, presence, face, but all things individually and collectively are naked and opened before the eyes of Him to Whom we must give an account.
 
Nothing and no one is hidden from The Word of God (Yeshua), Who is the subject of the previous verse. God has committed all judgment to Yeshua (John 5:22; Acts 17:31; Romans 2:16). No one can Hide from God (Psalms 139:7-12).
 
The early Jewish believers are reminded of Yeshua’s intimate presence and their right standing before Hashem in the Messiah. The believer stands as though naked before God in Messiah, thus, we must constantly seek to be aware of Him and the right use of our parts (every element of our soul existence) in Him.
 
“For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Messiah, so that each one may receive compensation for his deeds done through the body, in accordance with what he has done, whether good or bad.” - 2 Corinthians 5:10
 
14 Therefore, since we have a great high priest Who has passed through the heavens, Yeshua the Son of the God, let’s hold fast to our profession. 
 
Yeshua was introduced as Kohen HaGadol at 2:17. The writer now begins an exposition of Psalms 110:4 (Heb. 4:14-7:28), focusing on the role of Messiah Yeshua as Kohen HaGadol of a transcendent priesthood that is superior to that of Aaron. Being that it existed before creation and makes atonement possible for all who believe (1 Peter 1:19-20; Rev. 13:8).
 
Having reminded the Jewish believers of the reality of the present and coming Judgement of God. The writer of Hebrews now reminds them of the present and continued mediation provided by Messiah Yeshua the Son of God and Kohen Gadol “Great High Priest”.
 
Yeshua will one day be our Judge, and is now and unto that day our intercessor and advocate (Heb. 7:25; 1 John 2:1). What’s more, our names are written in His book of life (Rev. 21:27).
 
“Who has passed through” Means that through His death and resurrection, being without sin, Yeshua passed through all realms and offered atonement in the heavenly holy of holies, and is therefore subject to none, but God has made all subject to Him.
 
Because Yeshua has passed through the heavens to atone for us just as the Levitical high priest of Israel made atonement in the holy place (Lev. 16:15, 17) [a shadow of the heavenly things ref. Heb. 8:5; 10:1], we must hold fast together to the profession, testimony, witness of our faith. Not simply a confession, which is an admission of belief, but a profession, and active proclamation of that belief.
 
15 For we do not have a high priest (archiereus[G], kohen gadol[H]) Who is unable to sympathize, have compassion (sumpatheō[G]) with our weaknesses (astheneia[G]), but One who has been tempted, tried, examined, proved (peirazō[G]) in all things just as we are, yet without (chōris[G]) sin [missing the mark set by God’s holiness] (hamartia[G]). 16 Therefore let us come freely (meta[G]) with boldness, confidence (parrhēsia[G]) to the throne (thronos[G]) of grace, unmerited favour, practical love (charis[G], harachamiym[H]), so that we may receive (lambanō[G]) mercy (eleos[G], chaniynah[H]) and find (heuriskō[G]) grace (charis[G], chesed[H]) for help (boētheia[G], la’azar[H]) at the time of our need (eukairos[G]).
 
15 For we do not have a high priest Who is unable to sympathize, have compassion with our weaknesses, but One who has been tempted, tried, examined, proved in all things just as we are, yet without sin [missing the mark set by God’s holiness].
 
Hebrews 2:5-18 explains that Yeshua had a human nature like ours but remained sinless. Therefore, He is able to sympathize with us rather than empathize, because being tempted and tried in every way that it is possible for a human being to be challenged, He nonetheless remained sinless. He understands the pressures of the sin affected world (sympathy) but has not acted on them, or experienced sin (empathy).
 
The three primary forms of human sin are reflected in 1 John 2:15-17:
 
“15 Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. 16 For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world. 17 And the world passeth away, and the lust thereof: but he that doeth the will of God abideth for ever.” -1 John 2:15-17 KJV
 
1. Lust of the flesh
2. Lust of the eyes
3. Pride of life
 
It was to these three that Adam and Eve succumbed in the Garden of Eden (Gen. 3:1-6).
 
Yeshua on the other hand resisted all three (Matt. 4:1-11).
 
“For God has done what the Torah, weakened by the flesh, could not do. By sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin, he condemned sin in the flesh,” -Romans 8:3
 
That is not to say that the Torah is weak but that our weak flesh is unable to meet the standard it sets. Thus, Yeshua came in the weakness of our flesh in order to overcome that weakness and offer us freedom from it.
 
16 Therefore, let us come freely with boldness, confidence to the throne of grace, unmerited favour, practical love, so that we may receive mercy and find grace for help at the time of our need.
 
We can come freely and with confidence before the throne of God’s grace in Messiah because Messiah approaches with us and in us. He is both Judge and Mediator of the faithful.
 
“Throne of grace” is an unusual title, the more common designation being “throne of glory” (Jer. 14:21; Matt. 19:28). Because the context denotes Yeshua’s judgement seat, it seems likely that the “Throne of grace” refers to Yeshua’s throne. However, this does not negate the unity of God’s throne with Yeshua’s throne. As we have read previously, Yeshua is seated in the right hand of God. Locational earthly distinctions become redundant when seeking to understand the metaphysical realities of the Godhead. The Throne of God is described in 1 Kings 22:19; Isaiah 6:1; Ezekiel 1:26; Daniel 7:9.
 
Jewish tradition identifies multiple thrones, including a throne of God’s judgement and a throne of God’s mercy/grace (Targum in Psalms 29. 10. Talmud Bavliy Avoda Zara, fol. 3. 2. Zohar in Genesis fol. 38. 3. & in Numbers fol. 91. 2. & 93. 2. Megillat Esther, fol. 95. 1. Raziel, fol. 32. 1.)
 
"let my prayer come before Your throne of glory, and let my cry come before Your throne of thy mercy". -Raziel fol. 3. 1.
 
This is consistent with the present text.
 
By the grace of God Yeshua the King Messiah comes to set us free from our human propensity for sin and to walk with us in and toward the eternal Shabbat rest of God, so that we are holding His hand as we approach the throne of judgement and grace. Therefore we walk in terrified security, love engulfed fear, blissful trembling, toward Yeshua the Judge, being in Yeshua the High Priest, knowing that our names are written in the Lamb’s Book of Life. Why then would we ever be less than confident, or more than humble, except by allowing ourselves to be deluded through turning our gaze away from the King Messiah and toward the apathy of unbelief.
 
In our time of greatest need we have need of none other than the King Messiah.
 
Copyright 2021 Yaakov Brown