The Book of Yaakov (James) Chapter 2

Concerning faith and right action: what God has made one, let no man separate.

Yaakov 2:1-26 (Author’s convergent translation from Greek, Aramaic and Hebrew)
 
1 My brothers and sisters, fellow Jews [see 1:1], do not in partiality, favouritism, respect of persons hold the faith, belief, persuasion, trust in the Lord Yeshua Messiah the glory. 2 For if a person enters your synagogue wearing a gold ring, dressed in white, clean clothes, and a poor person, a beggar in shabby, dirty clothes also comes in, 3 and you gaze at the face of the one who is wearing the white, clean clothes, and say, “You sit here it’s a good spot,” and you say to the poor person, beggar, “You stand over there, or sit down by my footstool,” 4 Are you not then making separations, showing partiality among yourselves, and making yourselves judges with thoughts of evil, intentional harm? 5 Listen, hear, comprehend, understand my completely loved brothers and sisters, fellow Jews: did the God not select the poor, beggar of this world to be rich in faith, trust, persuasion, belief and heirs of the kingdom which He announced, promised to those who love Him completely, fully? 6 But you have despised, dishonoured the poor person. Is it not the rich who oppress, exercise harsh control over you and drag you before judgement seats? 7 Do they not blaspheme, speak evil of the good Name by which you have been called? 8 If, however, you are being filled with, the Kingly Torat/specific law/instruction according to the Writings/Scripture, “You shall love your neighbour as yourself, [Lev. 19:18]” you are doing good. 9 But if you show partiality, favouritism, you are committing sin, missing the mark set by God’s holiness and are rebuked, convicted by the Torah/Law as Torah/law breakers. 10 For whoever keeps, guards the entire Torah[H]/Law, yet stumbles, falls, offends in one, has become guilty, subject of all, individually and collectively. 11 For He who said, “Do not commit adultery,” also said, “Do not murder.” Now if you do not commit adultery, but do murder, you have made yourself a breaker of the Torah[H]/Law. 12 So speak, and so do, as those who are to be judged by the Torah[H]/law of freedom, liberty. 13 For judgment devoid of  mercy will be shown to one who has shown no mercy; the mercy rejoices against, is glorious over, triumphs over, perpetually boasts against the judgment. 14 What does it profit, my brothers and sisters, fellow Jews if someone says he has faith, trust, belief, persuasion, but he has no works, actions? Can faith, trust, belief, persuasion save him? 15 If a brother or sister is naked and lacks daily food, bread 16 and any one of you says to them, “Go in peace, wholeness, wellbeing, be warmed and be filled,” yet you don’t give them the things they need for their body, what use is that? 17 In the same way, faith, trust, belief, persuasion also, if it has no works, actions, deeds is dead, necrotic being alone, separate, apart. 18 But someone might say, “You have faith and I have works, actions; show me your faith without the works, actions, and I will show you my faith by my works, actions.” 19 You believe that the God is one, well done; the demons also believe, and shudder, tremble, stiffen, are horrified. 20 Now are you willing to know, act on the knowledge, you vain, empty person, that faith, trust, belief, persuasion without works, actions is barren, dead, necrotic? 21 Was our father Avraham not justified by works, actions when he bore, led, offered up his son Yitzchak (Isaac) on the altar? 22 You see that faith, trust, belief, persuasion together with his works, actions, and as a result of the works, actions, faith, trust, belief, persuasion was made perfect, fully filled, made whole, well-constructed. 23 and the Scripture, TaNaKh, Hebrew Bible was fulfilled which says, “And Avraham believed, agreed with God, and it was counted to him as righteousness, charity, practical love, [Gen. 15:6]” and he was called a friend of God. 24 You see, perceive therefore, now truly that a person is justified by works, actions and not by faith alone. 25 In the same way, was Rachav the prostitute not justified by works, actions also when she allowed entry to the messengers, angels and sent them out by another way? 26 For just as the body without the spirit is dead, so also faith without works, actions is dead.
 
Yaakov 2:1-26 (Line upon line)
 
1 My brothers and sisters, fellow Jews[see 1:1] (adelphos mou[G], achay[H]), do not (me[G]) in partiality, favouritism, respect of persons (prosōpolēpsias[G]) hold (echo[G]) the faith, belief, persuasion, trust (ho pistis[G], be’emunat[H]) in the Lord (ho kurios[G], Adoneinu[H]) Yeshua[H] (Iesous[G], Joshua, Jesus: YHVH Saves) Messiah (Christos[G], HaMashiyach[H], Anointed One) the glory (ho doxa[G]).
 
1 My brothers and sisters, fellow Jews [see 1:1], do not in partiality, favouritism, respect of persons hold the faith, belief, persuasion, trust in the Lord Yeshua[H] Messiah the glory.
 
Put simply, “As Jews and followers of Yeshua, Who is God with us (Imanu El), the glory of God in us, don’t practice favouritism. In particular, show no favouritism when new people, Jews and Gentiles alike, come into your Messianic Jewish Synagogue.” (v.2-3)
 
Yaakov continues to address the Messianic Jewish community of the first century Diaspora. He begins this portion with a reminder that halakhah (the way we walk) in Messiah is lit with Yeshua’s Glory. Therefore we are to walk as people who are aware of our own identity.
​
We are Talmidim (students) of our Glorious Messiah, having been shown favour we are to reject the practice of favouritism. The key to right action, that is, present halakhah, is the very nature of Messiah Himself. The Jewish writer of the Book to the Hebrews gives us a beautiful glimpse into the vast glory of the Mashiyach (Messiah) when he writes:

“Ha-Ben (the Son) is the radiance of HaShem’s (YHVH’s) glory and the exact representation of His being, sustaining all things by His powerful Davar (Word, Essence, Substance).” – Book to the Hebrews 1:3 (Author’s Translation)
 
We further notice that the previous (1:17-18, 23-25) metaphor promoting reflected glory is alluded to by way of inference in the latter part of the first verse of the present chapter “Messiah the glory”.
 
Yaakov is writing to Messiah following Jews living in Jewish communities throughout the known world. At this time (approx. 40 – 50 C.E.) they continued to worship in synagogues which were attended by a believing Jewish majority and by Gentile God fearers who prior to the coming of Yeshua and the Messianic Jewish faith were allowed to attend synagogue meetings only as standing guests at the open entry way to the synagogue. They could listen to and observe proceedings, but could not enter and sit among Jewish worshippers.
 
Also at this time Jewish believers were still struggling with the idea that Gentiles could be included in the redemptive work of God (Acts 10:28). Therefore, riches and poverty were just one aspect of the problem of partiality (favouritism). In part there was a righteous motivation for excluding Gentiles, who were perceived to be pagans practicing lifestyles contrary to the Torah and therefore were a danger to the spiritual health of the Jewish community. However, Biblical Judaism has always taught Israel not to act with partiality.
 
“17 You are not to recognize faces with partiality in judgment; you shall hear the small and the great alike. You are not to be afraid of any person, for the judgment is God’s…” -D’varim/Deuteronomy 1:17
 
2 For if a person (anēr[G], iysh[H]) enters your synagogue (synagoge[G], l’veiyt hakeneset[H]) wearing a gold ring (chrusodaktulios[G], zahav al yado[H]), dressed in white, clean (lampros[G]) clothes, and a poor person, a beggar (ptōchos[G]) in shabby, dirty (rhuparos[G]) clothes also comes in, 3 and you gaze at the face of (epiblepō[G], poniym[H]) the one who is wearing the white, clean (lampros[G]) clothes, and say, “You sit here it’s a good (kalōs[G], tava’at[H]) spot,” and you say to the poor person, beggar (ptōchos[G]), “You stand (histēmi[G]) over there, or sit down (kathēmai[G]) by my footstool (hupopodion[G], rag’lay[H]),”
 
2 For if a person enters your synagogue wearing a gold ring, dressed in white, clean clothes, and a poor person, a beggar in shabby, dirty clothes also comes in, 3 and you gaze at the face of the one who is wearing the white, clean clothes, and say, “You sit here it’s a good spot,” and you say to the poor person, beggar, “You stand over there, or sit down by my footstool,”
 
The Greek synagoge appears 57 times in the HaBriyt HaChadashah “New Testament” and is only once used to describe a non-Jewish assembly (Rev. 2:9). It is therefore unacceptable that the majority of English translations of the present text render synagoge[G] as “assembly, gathering, meeting” etc. This clouds the meaning and is at its core an antisemitic translational choice.
 
Translators have attempted to make this very Jewish book of Yaakov sound more universal by hiding Jewish specific terms beneath generic terminology. It is important to understand that this letter was being written to functioning Messianic synagogues throughout the Diaspora sometime between 40 and 50 C.E. That means that the Messiah following Jewish communities in question were predominantly Messianic Jews joined by a small number of Gentiles (unconverted observers of 1st Century Judaism), and that the Jewish majority continued to worship as Jews in a traditional Jewish way within the revelation of Messiah Yeshua.
 
We note that in this scenario the beggar in shabby clothing is being assigned either a standing position at or outside the door to the synagogue, or a seat on the floor. The former was once reserved for the “God fearing” Gentile (unconverted observer of 1st Century Judaism) and the latter for the lower class of Jew. However, In Messiah not only were the lower class Jews elevated, the Gentiles were now welcome to enter and be seated within the believing Jewish community.
 
Ancient Jewish law concerning the equal treatment of rich and poor alike in judiciary matters is sighted by Maimonides:
 
"Two adversaries (in a dispute with each other), if one of them is clothed with precious garments, goodly apparel, and the other is clothed with, vile clothing, (the judge) says to the honorable (wealthy) person, ‘either clothe him (the poor person) as you are clothed, while you contend with him, or be clothed as he is, so that you may be alike, on an equal footing.’'' -Maimonides on Hilchot Sanhedrin, c. 21. sect. 2.
 
Further, with regard to social position as it applied to matters of law Maimonides sites the Talmud Bavliy:
 
"One shall not sit, and another stand, but both shall stand; but if the Sanhedrin, or court, are pleased to let them sit, they sit; but one does not sit above, and the other below; but one by the side of the other.'' - Maimonides ib. sect. 3. vid. Talmud Bavliy Shebuot, fol. 30. 1.
 
4 Are you not then making separations, showing partiality (diakrinō[G]) among yourselves, and making (ginomai[G]) yourselves judges (kritēs[G], shoftiym[H]) with thoughts (dialogismos[G]) of evil, intentional harm (ponēros[G], resha[H])? 5 Listen, hear, comprehend, understand (shimu[H]) my completely loved brothers and sisters, fellow Jews (adelphos agapētos[G], achay ahuvay[H]): did the God (ho Theos[G], Elohiym[H]) not select (eklegomai[G]) the poor, beggar (ptōchos[G]) of this world (kosmos toutou[G], haolam[H]) to be rich (plousios[G]) in faith, trust, persuasion, belief (pistis[G], Emunah[H]) and heirs (klēronomos[G]) of the kingdom (ho basileia[G], hamalchut[H]) which He announced, promised (epaggellō[G], hivtiyach[H]) to those who love Him completely, fully (ha agapaō autos[G], leohavayv[H])? 
 
4 Are you not then making separations, showing partiality among yourselves, and making yourselves judges with thoughts of evil, intentional harm? 5 Listen, hear, comprehend, understand my completely loved brothers and sisters, fellow Jews: did the God not select the poor, beggar of this world to be rich in faith, trust, persuasion, belief and heirs of the kingdom which He announced, promised to those who love Him completely, fully?
 
We note that it is not distinctions but separations among the Jewish believing community that are being addressed. The primary issue is wrong motivations (yetzer hara) and the passing of judgement based on outward appearances. Yeshua had commanded His disciples to stop judging by mere appearances and make right judgements (John 7:24). Yaakov is not instructing the Jewish believers not to judge but instead not to make false judgements. When we judge by appearances we are submitting our judgement to the sin affected reality of this temporary world, whereas when we judge according to God’s Spirit we are distinguishing between the temporal and the eternal and choosing the eternal (2 Cor. 4:18).
 
Yaakov is reminding his fellow Messiah following dispersed countrymen that their understanding of what obedience to the Torah (Instruction) requires had always included just treatment of all people within the Jewish community. This is not a foreign practice to his readers, it had simply become a neglected one within the Jewish communities of the Diaspora. Why? Because they had adopted, or syncretised pagan Hellenistic practices.

“Do not pervert justice or show partiality—undue favour for one over another. Do not accept a bribe, for a bribe blinds the eyes of the wise and twists the words of the innocent.” -D’varim/Deuteronomy 16:19

The real issue being addressed here is the motive of the human core (heart) that is the point from which all the parts of our being emanate rather than the heart in opposition to the mind. Perhaps money was needed for the running of the synagogue, the purchase of Torah scrolls etc.? Whatever the reason for showing favouritism, the Torah clearly instructs against the practice.
 
“did the God not select the poor, beggar of this world to be rich in faith, trust, persuasion, belief…” We note that the text does not say “God chose the poor to be rich”, but “God chose the poor to be rich in faith.” The false Prosperity Gospel misses the point. What good are temporal riches that dull the faith of a person? God wills prosperity for the believer in Himself, but He does not will our temporal material prosperity except that it be utilised in the furthering of His Kingdom. “What good does it do a person to gain the entire world but loose his soul?” (Mk. 8:36; Matt. 16:26)
 
The materially poor are rich in faith because they are devoid of the distraction of temporal riches. Those who are materially poor are inclined toward trusting God because they have nothing and no one but God to place their trust in. Therefore, material poverty can act as a vehicle for spiritual prosperity.
 
“The meek will inherit the land and enjoy peace and prosperity.” - Tehillim/Psalm 37:11

“Blessing comes from God for the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of Heaven.” – Mattitiyahu/Matthew 5:3
 
As I have said, Yaakov admonishes his hearers to “Look not to what is seen but to what is unseen, for what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is everlasting” (2 Cor. 4:18).
 
In particular Yaakov is using phrasing that speaks to the 1st Century Jewish view of the Gentiles. He is employing specific terminology. For example ancient Jewish commentary refers to aniy Yisrael “the poor of Israel” as being distinct from aniy olam “the poor of the world”*. The “world” was seen as synonymous with “goyim” nations, pagans. Therefore, in one sense “the poor of this world” is understood by Yaakov’s hearers as referring to the Gentiles who are both poor in respect to physical wealth and in respect to spiritual health. This makes the teaching somewhat offensive to the early Jewish believers which is why Yaakov has prepared them by saying “Be quick to listen and slow to anger” (1:19-20).
 
*Talmud Bavliy. Gittin, fol. 30. 1. & Bava Batra, fol. 10. 2.
 
“The Kingdom which He promised to those who love Him fully.” The receiving of the Kingdom is simple, it is given to those who love Him fully. Do you love Him (God) fully, in Messiah? Then the Kingdom is given to you. Devoid of Messiah Yeshua we are all poor, lacking, dressed in filth.
 
6 But you have despised, dishonoured (atimazō[G]) the poor person (ptōchos[G]). Is it not the rich (plousios[G]) who oppress, exercise harsh control over (katadunasteuō[G]) you and drag (helkuō[G]) you before (eis[G]) judgement seats (kritērion[H], levateiy mishpat[H])? 7 Do they not blaspheme, speak evil of (blasphēmeō[G]) the good (kalos[G], hatovah[H]) name (onoma[G], HaShem[H]) by which you have been called (epikaleomai[G], hanikra aleiychem[H])?
 
6 But you have despised, dishonoured the poor person. Is it not the rich who oppress, exercise harsh control over you and drag you before judgement seats? 7 Do they not blaspheme, speak evil of the good name by which you have been called?
 
Put concisely, don’t do to fellow believers of any ethnicity what is being done to you by non-believers.
 
The foolish false choice posed by various Christian theologians, Hebrew Roots and Messianic writers asking “To Whom does ‘the good name’ refer?” is ludicrous. First because God is One and second because nothing could be further from Hebraic practice than a refusal to accept both interpretations as valid. Ultimatums are contrary to Biblical Hebrew thought. Scripture shines a light on cause and effect and God speaks clearly concerning action and consequence, practice and outcomes, whereas ultimatums are the domain of fallen humanity.
 
The early Jewish believers were being taken to court on false charges by both rich Gentiles who hated them because of their association to YHVH, El Elohay Yisrael (the God of Israel v.5) and by rich rabbinical Jews who hated them due to their association with Yeshua HaMashiyach (Jesus the King Messiah v.1).
 
So, in response to the false choice posed by Christian and Messianic Scholars alike “Which Name is being referred to, YHVH or Jesus?” we respond, “Yes!”
 
 “The good Name” is YHVH (v.5), Yeshua (v.1), Elohiym, El Elyon, El Shaddai, El Gibor, Adonay Yireh, Adonay Shalom, Sar shalom, Imanu-El… Adonay Eloheinu Adonay echad (God is One)!
 
8 If, however, you are being filled with (teleō[G]), the Kingly (basilikos[G], hamalchut[H]) Torat[H]/specific law/instruction (nomos[G]) according to the Writings/Scripture (graphe[G], Ketuvim/kakatuv[H]), “You shall love your neighbour as yourself, [Lev. 19:18]” you are doing good (kalōs[G], heiytavtem[H]). 9 But if you show partiality, favouritism (prosōpolēpteō[G]), you are committing (ergazomai[G]) sin, missing the mark set by God’s holiness (hamartia[G]) and are rebuked, convicted (elegchō[G]) by the Torah[H]/Law (ho nomos[G], haTorah[H]) as Torah/law breakers (parabatēs[G]). 
 
8 If, however, you are being filled with, the Kingly Torat/specific law/instruction according to the Writings/Scripture, “You shall love your neighbour as yourself, [Lev. 19:18]” you are doing good. 9 But if you show partiality, favouritism, you are committing sin, missing the mark set by God’s holiness and are rebuked, convicted by the Torah/Law as Torah/law breakers. 
 
“If, however, you are being filled with, the Kingly Torat/specific law/instruction according to the Writings/Scripture” We must first take note of the specificity of Yaakov’s language regarding “law”. In this verse he speaks of a particular “Kingly” or “Royal” nomos[G]/torat[H] that is found in the fullness of the TaNaKh, or Ketuvim (Writings, Hebrew Bible). By quoting the very specific law (torat, a part of the Torah) “You shall love your neighbour as yourself” (Le. 19:18), Yaakov is passing on the teaching of His brother Yeshua the Messiah, Who summed up the Torah of Moses and the Prophets this way:
 
36 “Teacher, which is the great commandment in the Torah?” 37 And He said to him, “‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.’ 38 This is the head and great commandment. 39 The second is like it, ‘You shall love your neighbour as yourself.’ 40 Upon these two commandments hang the entire Torah and hanevi’im.”
 
-Mattitiyahu (Matthew) 22:36-40
 
Yaakov calls the summation of Yeshua’s teaching on the Torah and the Prophets the “Kingly Torah”, as distinct from the Torah of Moses. As I have explained previously, while aspects of the Torah of Moses are present as part of the whole of the “Kingly Torah, Torah Perfected, Torah of Freedom”, the clear distinctions made by both Yaakov and Rav Shaul, based on the teaching of Yeshua, mean that we cannot simplistically understand Torah in these verses to refer to the Torah of Moses except when it is clearly qualified as it is in verse 9 where the Greek reads “ho nomos” the Torah.
 
In verses 8-9 Yaakov speaks to those Jews called in Yeshua to act in accordance with the Kingly Torah of Yeshua and to recognize their hypocrisy in the face of both the Kingly Torah and the Torah of Moses. Parts of the Torah of Moses will pass away, but nothing of the Kingly Torah of Yeshua will ever pass away.
 
Yaakov’s audience is Jewish, when they hear “torat” they understand a singular aspect of the Torah, and when they hear the words “ha Torah” at the end of verse 9 they recognize the Torah of Moses. Yaakov then, is linking the Kingly Torah of God’s Messiah with the Torah of Moses while making a clear distinction between the two. Therefore the Kingly Torah as understood through the lens of the pivotal verse, “Love your neighbour as yourself,” thus creating a unity of belief and action born in the freedom of Messiah’s teaching. The point being that Yaakov is not inventing a new kind of Torah, he is revealing the Torah filled with Messiah and driven by the Ruach ha-Kodesh (Holy Spirit). As I have explained, there are parts of the Torah of Moses which will become obsolete at the point of final judgment and our entry into the Olam Haba (world to come), but as Messiah himself has said, “I tell you truly, until heaven and earth pass away not one minor or major mark will disappear from the Torah until all things are accomplished.” – Mattitiyahu/Matthew 5:18

“Zayit Ra’anan says… ‘The Holy One, blessed be He, says, “you sin in this world because the yetzer hara (evil inclination) governs you; but in the Olam haba (world to come), I will take it (yetzer ha-ra) away from you;” as it is said in Ezekiel 36:26 “I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh and give you a heart of flesh.”’” – Midrash Yalkut Shim’oni (medieval)

When we abide in the Kingly Torah within Messiah we do well, recognizing the discipline and instruction of God. On the other hand, when we give in to the yetzer ha-ra “fallen inclination”, we cloud our ability to see the Kingly Torah (which brings liberty). When we wilfully break the Torah we deceive ourselves and are in danger of believing the lie that we are no longer secure. The irony here is that in showing favouritism we are endanger of believing that at some point we could lose God’s favour. Therefore, we must show others the favour that God has shown us in Messiah.
 
“You shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of your people (Israel), and you shall love your neighbour as yourself: I am YHVH.” -Leviticus 19:18
 
We note that “You shall love your neighbour as yourself” is the second clause in the commandment being quoted by Yaakov. The commandment begins by saying “You shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of your people (Israel)”. Therefore, Yaakov is addressing the problem of early Jewish believers discriminating not only against the poor and bedraggled but also against Gentile believers.
 
“Owe no person anything, but to love one another: for those who love one another have fully filled the Torah.” -Rav shaul: Letter to the Roman Believers 13:8
 
Those who are focused on the Messiah and as a result love others as themselves are fully filling the Torah of Moses, whereas those focused on attempting to fully observe the Torah of Moses are continually failing to do so. With regard to Torah there is no “try”, there is only “Do” and “Do not”. How much better then to request that God manifest Himself in me through Yeshua, than to seek to reach Him through the delusional claim of Torah observance.
 
10 For whoever keeps, guards (tēreō[G]) the entire (holos[G]) Torah[H]/Law (nomos[G]), yet stumbles, falls, offends (ptaiō[G]) in one (heis[G]), has become guilty, subject (enochos[G]) of all, individually and collectively (pas[G]). 11 For He who said, “Do not commit adultery,” also said, “Do not murder.” Now if you do not commit adultery, but do murder, you have made yourself (ginomai[G]) a breaker (parabatēs[G]) of the Torah[H]/Law (nomos[G]). 
 
10 For whoever keeps, guards the entire Torah[H]/Law, yet stumbles, falls, offends in one, has become guilty, subject of all, individually and collectively. 11 For He who said, “Do not commit adultery,” also said, “Do not murder.” Now if you do not commit adultery, but do murder, you have made yourself a breaker of the Torah[H]/Law.
 
Given the context this teaching says, “If you’re keeping most of the laws of the Torah but are breaking the Kingly law to love your neighbour as yourself, then the Torah exposes your guilt and you come under the judgement of the entire Torah.”
 
Those who claim that Yaakov teaches Torah Observance are delusional. He is in fact teaching that Torah Observance (with the exception of Yeshua) is impossible. This is consistent with what Yaakov says in Acts 15. The early Jewish Fathers of the Body of believers agreed that Torah Observance was not incumbent on the Gentile believers. Those demanding that Gentile believers be circumcised were silenced by Rav Shaul (Paul), Yaakov, and Kefa (Peter).
 
It is important to note that the two commandments mentioned here by Yaakov are to do with the love of one’s neighbour. It is often the case that as we journey with God we begin to become complacent. On a historical level the physical separation of the Messianic Jews in the Diaspora from the Jews of Israel was a living metaphor for their journey away from right action. When we become complacent in our faith we can fall into the trap of considering some commandments more important than others, thus we justify sinful action based on a sort of sin hierarchy where murder is bad but lusting after my neighbour’s wife is just what men are prone to do. Yaakov reminds his Jewish brothers and sisters that when we say to God, “I’ll keep most of your commandments but I don’t agree with this one, so I’ll just ignore it,” we are already guilty.
 
As I have already stated, in more general terms Yaakov is teaching the one who says, “I am a Torah keeper” that such a statement is lie and thus breaks Torah. With the exception of Yeshua no one can claim to be a Torah keeper.
 
I am obligated to add a further warning concerning a grave mis-teaching within the modern Messianic movement which makes Torah Observance an object of worship:
 
Those who teach the lie "Obeying Torah is the fruit of salvation" mis-qualify both Torah and salvation. "Messiah is the goal of Torah" unto works of righteousness. Torah observance is not the goal, end, or fruit of Messiah. If it were, Messiah would be subject to Torah, but instead He is the Author and Goal of it.
 
It is not Torah observance that is the fruit of the redeemed but right action. Ezekiel 36:26-27 explains that by the Spirit of Life (Holy Spirit) in Messiah Yeshua (Rom.8:2), we are empowered to act according to His (YHVH) prescribed (בְּקִרְבְּכֶם) way of living and according to His judgements (מִשְׁפָּטַי). Torah is not mentioned. Why? Because observance of the Torah of Moses is not the goal, end, or fruit. Thus we are "set free from the Torah of sin and death (the result of a failure to observe the unkeepable Mosaic Torah)" [Rom.8:2].
 
Peter (Rav Kefa) explains that no one can "bear" the "burden" of Torah observance (Acts 15:10). Yaakov (James) and the early Jewish Fathers of the body of faith along with Peter, agreed that therefore Gentile believers should not be taught Torah observance but to simply refrain from all forms of idolatry in accordance with the universally moral commandments of God (10 commandments minus Shabbat, which is a sign on ethnic Israel, the Jews [Ex.31:16-17]) Peter said this as a Spirit filled Messiah follower, not as an unsaved pre-Messianic Jew. Therefore, Peter and the early Jewish Fathers of the Body of believers agree that Torah observance is not the fruit of salvation.
 
We add to this the teaching of Yeshua, Rav Shaul, and the Kohen (probably Barnabas) who wrote the Book to the Hebrews:
 
Rom. 3:20; 4:14; 4:15; 5:20; 6:14; 7:1-13; 8:2-3, 1 Cor. 15:56, 2 Cor. 3:7; 3:9; 3:10; 3:12; 3:14-17, Gal. 2:16; 2:19; 2:21; 3:1;3:10; 3:11-12; 3:13; 3:16 & 19, (ref. Matt. 11:12-13, Luke 16:16), Gal. 3:21; 3:23; 4:24; Eph. 2:15, Phlp. 3:4-8; 1 Tim. 1:8 (Torah was made for the unrighteous, not for the righteous.) 1 Tim. 1:9-10; Heb. 7:18-19; 8:7-8; 8:13; 10:1.
 
It is wrong to say that “Torah is done away with”, it is equally wrong to say that “Torah observance is the goal, end, fruit” or otherwise. When using "Torah" as a proper noun we speak in general terms that lack the nuisance of the wider definition. This is why the writers of the HaBrit HaChadashah (NT) often use qualifying terms in relationship to Torah (Instruction).
 
"because through Messiah Yeshua the Torah* of the Spirit of life (Torah of Messiah) has set you free from the Torah* of sin and death. (Result of the failure to keep the unkeepable Torah of Moses)" -Romans 8:2
 
So called "Messianics" need to stop arguing over the keeping of days and the obeying of laws and return to the Person of Messiah Yeshua in God. No one will stand at the judgement and be able to use Torah observance as a means of redemption.
 
If we claim to be Torah observant we make ourselves to be liars. As I have said, with regard to Torah there is no "try", there is “do” and “do not”. No human being (with the exception of the King Messiah) can keep the Torah perfectly. I do not keep the Torah, rather the Torah perfected of the Spirit of life keeps me in Messiah Yeshua. Those in the so called "Messianic" movement who claim to be Torah observant are lying. They are idolaters of the worst kind because in focusing on Torah they have turned their backs on the Author of it. It is for freedom that Messiah has set us free!
 
*The word Torah must be qualified
 
12 So speak (laleō[G], davru[H]), and so do (poieō[G]), as those who are to be judged (krino[G]) by the Torah[H]/law (nomos[G], Torah[H]) of freedom, liberty (eleutheria[G], shel cheirut[H]). 13 For judgment (krisis[G], badiyn[H]) devoid of  mercy (me eleos[G], eiyn rachamiym[H]) will be shown to one who has shown no mercy (me eleos[G], nahag rachamiym[H]); the mercy (eleos[G], harachamiym[H]) rejoices against, is glorious over, triumphs over, perpetually boasts against (katakauchaomai[G]) the judgment (krisis[G], hadiyn[H]). 14 What does it profit (ophelos[G]), my brothers and sisters, fellow Jews (mou adelphos[G], achay[H]) if someone says he has faith, trust, belief, persuasion (pistis[G], emunah[H]), but he has no works, actions (me ergon[G])? Can faith, trust, belief, persuasion (pistis[G], emunah[H]) save (sōzō[G], lehoshiyo[H]) him? 
 
12 So speak, and so do, as those who are to be judged by the Torah[H]/law of freedom, liberty. 13 For judgment devoid of  mercy will be shown to one who has shown no mercy; the mercy rejoices against, is glorious over, triumphs over, perpetually boasts against the judgment. 14 What does it profit, my brothers and sisters, fellow Jews if someone says he has faith, trust, belief, persuasion, but he has no works, actions? Can faith, trust, belief, persuasion save him?
 
Yaakov admonishes his Jewish brothers and sisters who follow Messiah Yeshua to speak and act as those being judged, not by the Torah of Moses but by the Torah of Liberty.
 
The wonderful result of accepting God’s mercy is that we will in turn show mercy to others, thus “Mercy triumphs over judgment” (that is mercy triumphs over a judgment of condemnation). Mercy triumphs in the judgment that brings discipline and freedom, thus we have the Torah of Messiah that brings Liberty.
 
There are those who are uncomfortable with the plain Greek text saying “can faith save him?” They add to it translating “can that faith save him”. There is no need to add “that” to the text. One who is convinced that his faith need not be acted on does not accept the saving faith of Yeshua and therefore cannot be saved by faith. More to the point, faith cannot save, rather the Messiah Yeshua in Whom we place true faith, He is the Saviour. Thus Messiah in us outworks faith through us. We act righteously because we have received the nature of Messiah.
 
Here Yaakov is speaking of a divisive faith, a faith that compartmentalizes life. The action of a pumping heart is the proof that a man is alive, when the heart ceases its action the body is dead. The predisposition of the Holy Spirit Who lives in us, is to help those in need, in order to fail to help the destitute we must first resist the Ruach ha-Kodesh, for a believer this is known as grieving (not blaspheming) the Spirit. The conclusion then is this, isolated faith is dead. In a believer however, the failure to act causes conviction of spirit and therefore revives the body. It is as if the heart has lost its rhythm temporarily for lack of vigour and then the Spirit pulls out the shock panels and gives us a jump start.
 
15 If a brother (adelphos[G], ach[H]) or sister (adelphē[G], achot[H]) is naked (gumnos[G]) and lacks (leipō[G]) daily (ephēmeros[G]) food, bread (lechem[H]) 16 and any one (tis[G]) of you says to them, “Go (hupagō[G]) in peace, wholeness, wellbeing (eirēnē[G], leshalom[H]), be warmed (thermainō[G]) and be filled (chortazō[G]),” yet you don’t give (didōmi[G]) them the things they need (epitēdeios[G]) for their body (sōma[G]), what use is that (ophelos[G], mah hoaltem[H])? 
 
15 If a brother or sister is naked and lacks daily food, bread 16 and any one of you says to them, “Go in peace, wholeness, wellbeing, be warmed and be filled,” yet you don’t give them the things they need for their body, what use is that?
 
“is naked and lacks daily bread” “Give us today our daily bread” is part of the formula of Tefilat haTalmidim “The Disciples Prayer” taught by Yeshua the King Messiah (Matt. 6:9-13). Here Yaakov reminds his hearers that in relationship through Messiah they are to participate in godly acts of provision. What fool, having prayed “Give us today our daily bread”, then sends his believing brother or sister away without bread for the day?
 
“Go in peace, wholeness, wellbeing, be warmed and be filled,” yet you don’t give them the things they need for their body, what use is that? To wish a fellow believer, in this case a fellow Jewish believer “Peace, wholeness, and wellbeing”, knowing that they are distressed, incomplete, unwell, and having the means to give them peace, wholeness and wellbeing, is an abhorrent act of rebellion against the specific Kingly Torah command “You shall love your neighbour as yourself!”
 
17 In the same way, faith, trust, belief, persuasion (pistis[G], ha’emunah[H]) also, if it has no works, actions, deeds (ergon[G]) is dead, necrotic (nekros[G], meitah[H]) being alone, separate, apart (kata heautou[G], ). 18 But someone might say, “You have faith (pistis[G], emunah[H]) and I have works, actions (ergon[G], ma’asiym[H]); show me your faith (pistis[G], emunah[H]) without the works, actions (ergon[G]), and I will show you my faith (pistis[G], emunah[H]) by my works, actions (ergon[G]).” 
 
17 In the same way, faith, trust, belief, persuasion also, if it has no works, actions, deeds is dead, necrotic being alone, separate, apart. 18 But someone might say, “You have faith and I have works, actions; show me your faith without the works, actions and I will show you my faith by my works, actions.” 
 
Yaakov is not saying “I will show you my faith by my Torah observance”, a curse on that idea! The works, actions in question are right actions, otherwise known as righteousness. Yaakov is saying “The evidence of my faith is in the right actions that proceed from it”. It is not Torah observance that produces Yaakov’s right actions but faith in Messiah that produces them. This is a foundational doctrine of the Messianic Faith that has been abused by far too many so called “Messianic” teachers who promote the false doctrine of “Torah Observance” in contradiction of the teaching of Yaakov, Yochanan and Rav Shaul.
 
The Hebraic back and forth of Yaakov’s work is a reflection of Yeshua’s teaching style, and is in turn reflected in Rav Shaul’s works. It was and remains a strong rabbinical technique that acts to expose flawed or self-defeating thinking (circular logic).
 
Like a heart that doesn’t pump blood, faith without action is dead. The words, “faith by itself without right action is dead,” are a precursor to the final words of this portion of Yaakov. It is important to note that faith in unity with right action is life. The blood, the heart and the oxygen are all required in order to unify the living body. It’s as if Yaakov were saying “Show me life in a heart that doesn’t beat and I will show you life in my beating heart!”
 
“Really?” Says Yaakov, with incredulity. “You’re able to exhibit faith without acting righteously? Okay, but I will exhibit faith by acting in unity with the Holy Spirit.”
 
Faith, being unseen cannot be seen except in action. Therefore, the one who fails to act proves himself faithless.
 
Faith devoid of right action is not only a corpse, it is a necrotic, stinking corpse. Ironically, faith without the evidence of right action produces a spiritual stench in the nostrils of the faithful.
 
19 You believe (pisteuō[G]) that the God (ho Theos[G], haElohiym[H]) is one (heis[G], echad[H]) well done (poieō kalōs[G]); the demons (ho daimonion[G], hasheidiym[H]) also believe (pisteuō[G]), and shudder, tremble, stiffen, are horrified (phrissō[G]). 20 Now (de[G]) are you willing to know, act on the knowledge (ginōskō[G]), you vain, empty (kenos[G]) person (anthrōpos[G], iysh[H]), that faith, trust, belief, persuasion (pistis[G], emunah[H]) without works, actions (ergon[G], ma’asiym[H]) is barren, dead, necrotic (nekros[G], akarah[H])? 
 
19 You believe that the God is one well done; the demons also believe, and shudder, tremble, stiffen, are horrified. 20 Now are you willing to know, act on the knowledge, you vain, empty person, that faith, trust, belief, persuasion without works, actions is barren, dead, necrotic?
 
Many, lacking knowledge of ancient Biblical Jewish practice, and indeed of Jewish practice in general, fail to understand just how harsh these words of Yaakov are, even beyond their apparent abruptness.
 
Yaakov is pulling out the big guns. One can see why prior to this he had instructed his hearers to be quick to listen and slow to anger (1:19-20). Yaakov is quite literally quoting the Shema in the present verse.
 
“You say, ‘Shema (hear, listen, perceive and understand), Oh Israel, the LORD our God, the LORD is Echad (One, a unity).’ Be’seder, okay, good for you, so you recite the Shema three times a day, mazel tov (Congratulations)! The demons know the words of the Shema also, they believe that God is One, and it scares the crap out of them. You see, belief is subject to inclination. If your inclination is evil (yetzer ha-ra) then your belief is redundant.
 
Further to the insult, the Greek kenos (empty, vain) interprets the Hebrew/Aramaic Raka, Reyka used in Matthew 5:22. This is yet another example of how context and motivation affect the interpretation and application of Scripture. Yeshua teaches that no one should call another by the term Raka from a motivation of willing death on them. However, in the context of Yaakov’s writing, describing a foolish person as a fool is a valid application of Biblical doctrine.

21 Was our father (Avinu[H]) Avraham[H] not justified (dikaioō[G]) by works, actions (ergon[G], ma’asiym[H]) when he bore, lead, offered (anapherō[G]) up his son Yitzchak[H] (Isaac) on the altar (thusiastērion[G], haMizbeach[H])? 22 You see that faith, trust, belief, persuasion (pistis[G], haemunah[H]) together (sunergeō[G]) with his works, actions (ergon[G], ma’asiym[H]), and as a result of the works, actions (ergon[G], ma’asiym[H]), faith, trust, belief, persuasion (pistis[G], emunah[H]) was made perfect, fully filled, made whole, well-constructed (teleioō[G], hush’lemah[H]). 
 
21 Was our father Avraham not justified by works, actions when he bore, led, offered up his son Yitzchak (Isaac) on the altar? 22 You see that faith, trust, belief, persuasion together with his works, actions, and as a result of the works, actions, faith, trust, belief, persuasion was made perfect, fully filled, made whole, well-constructed. 
 
Yaakov is not saying that Avraham was justified by actions alone but that his right actions were evidence of his faith and thus he was justified. This is affirmed by verse 22.
 
Notice that Avraham’s actions were born of faith. Right action is the fruit of faith, the evidence of healthy roots, and just as a fruit tree is imperfect without fruit, so faith without right action is barren. Yaakov uses the word complete/full/perfect, here in unity with the word One/echad from the previous verses. He is showing that God, Who is One, Completes or makes One, faith and action.
 
“In faith, trust, assurance, belief Avraham, when he was examined, proved, brought up Yitzchak [Isaac], and the one who had received the promises was offering up his only son;” -Hebrews 11:17 (Author’s translation)
 
23 and the Scripture, TaNaKh (Torah, Prophets, Writings), [Hebrew Bible] (ho graphē[G], hakatuv[H]) was fulfilled (plēroō[G]) which says, “And Avraham believed, agreed with (pisteuō[G], vayamein[H]) God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]), and it was counted (logizomai[G]) to him as righteousness, charity, practical love (dikaiosunē[G], tzedakah[H]), [Gen. 15:6]” and he was called a friend (philos[G]) of God (Theos[G], Elohiym[H]). 24 You see, perceive (horaō[G]) therefore, now truly (toinun[G]) that a person is justified (dikaioō[G]) by works, actions (ergon[G], ma’asiym[H]) and not by faith (pistis[G], emunah[H]) alone (monon[G]). 
 
23 and the Scripture, TaNaKh, Hebrew Bible was fulfilled which says, “And Avraham believed, agreed with God, and it was counted to him as righteousness, charity, practical love, [Gen. 15:6]” and he was called a friend of God. 24 You see, perceive therefore, now truly that a person is justified by works, actions and not by faith alone. 
 
So, Avraham’s faith/belief/trust, was credited to him as right action. Now we see right action as the recompense/payment/credit/reward of right faith/trust/belief. The declaration of a man’s righteousness is made by those who observe his right action, while the right action itself is the declaration of right faith.
 
25 In the same way, was Rachav[H] the prostitute (pornē[G]) not justified (dikaioō[G]) by works, actions (ergon[G], ma’asiym[H]) also when she allowed entry to (hupodechomai[G]) the messengers, angels (aggelos[G], malakhiym[H]) and sent them out by another way? 26 For just as the body (sōma[G], shehaguf[H]) without the spirit (pneuma[G], ruach[H]) is dead (nekros[G], meit[H]), so also faith (pistis[G], emunah[H]) without works, actions (ergon[G], ma’asiym[H]) is dead (nekros[G], meitah[H]).
 
25 In the same way, was Rachav the prostitute not justified by works, actions also when she allowed entry to the messengers, angels and sent them out by another way? 26 For just as the body without the spirit is dead, so also faith without works, actions is dead.
 
“And Joshua the son of Nun sent out of Shittim two men to spy secretly, saying, Go view the land, even Jericho. And they went, and came into an harlot's house, named Rahab, and lodged there.” -Joshua 2:1
 
“By faith the harlot Rahab perished not with them that believed not, when she had received the spies with peace.” -Hebrews 11:31
 
It was Rahab’s faith in the God of Israel that motivated her to act to save her children and protect her family. She rightly believed that God was able to destroy the city of Jericho. Therefore her genuine faith bore the fruit of right action.

Finally, “Just as the body without the spirit is dead, so to faith without right action is dead.” The spirit and faith correlate to one another and the body and action are also a pair. From this we can conclude that both these combinations (faith and works as well as spirit and body) become unclean when separated. To a Jew a dead body (according to the Torah) is unclean, so Yaakov is making a startling, even defiling insinuation. “If your faith lacks right action you are spiritually unclean and if your actions lack true faith then your actions are unclean. I know you’ve been living in the Diaspora among Greeks for some time now but don’t be misled by Greek philosophy,” says Yaakov, “they seek to divide and conquer, or have you forgotten that we Jews understand life as a unity, a functioning being of many parts, all interconnected. ‘Shema Yisrael, Adonai, Elohaynu, Adonai echad!’”
 
“the body without the spirit is dead.” This is a known Jewish saying, recorded in Ohel Moed, fol. 15. 1.
 
“Therefore we conclude that a person is justified by faith without the works of the Torah.” -Romans 3:28
 
When we place this teaching of Yaakov alongside that of Rav Shaul we see that Yaakov is emphasising the right action born of faith as being “works”. He is not saying that Torah observance is the right action but that right action is evidence of the Kingly Torah taught by Messiah, which is at work in the believer.
 
Torah observance is motivated by human effort whereas right action results from relationship, that relationship being offered by God and received by the believer. Thus, Avraham first believed God and subsequently offered up his son Isaac. Note that the Torah was yet to be given to Israel at the point of Avraham’s belief and right action. Therefore, Avraham was not seeking to observe Torah but rather to respond to God in righteousness, thus Avraham’s unified faith in action was credited to him as righteousness.

In Messiah Yeshua there is no separation of faith and works. There are faith-works and there is working-faith. When Shaul/Paul says, “You are saved by faith alone, and not by works, that no one might boast,” he is rebuking boasting (which is work without faith). We are better to understand Paul this way, “It is by faith unified that you are saved and not by works (deeds devoid of faith) so that no one should boast about having earned their own right standing with God.” Shaul is definitely not contradicting Yaakov, a man whose authority he both submitted to and respected. On the contrary, Shaul affirms Yaakov’s teaching. Of course
this should come as no surprise, given that the Ruach ha-Kodesh inspired the words of both men.

I will conclude this way, concerning faith and right action: what God has made one, let no man separate.

© 2022 Yaakov Brown